sentence-transformers How to use MaxNoichl/bge-m3-philosophy-triplets_v1 with sentence-transformers:
from sentence_transformers import SentenceTransformer
model = SentenceTransformer("MaxNoichl/bge-m3-philosophy-triplets_v1")
sentences = [
"philosophical. It is a schematic, bare-bones biography devoting only minimal attention to the significance of Marx's thought. It makes no attempt at textual exegesis beyond citations of a few \" classic\" passages, let alone at critical evaluation or interpretation of Marx's ideas. Yet its extremely readable style, richness of detail and highly useful manner of viewing Marx's life against the political history of his era, makes this book a service to the general public if not to the philosopher or Marxologist. (It should hardly need saying that Rubel is himself one of the world's eminent practicioners of the latter art.) Each chapter is devoted to six or seven years of Marx's life. Preceding each, the authors have included very valuable chronological tables listing major political events in Europe, the Americas and Asia, scientific and technological advances, and important works published (including notation as to whether Marx is known to have read them). The short biographies of various persons important to the life story of Marx and bibliographies of Marx's works and of works on Marx are also helpful. Rubel and Manale's understanding of Marx's intellectual development, as a unity originating in the mid1840s carried through consistently for the remainder of his life, is well documented, with due emphasis given the manuscripts of 1857-58 (the \"Grundrisse\") documenting the link between the Paris manuscripts of 1844 and Capital so often disputed by Marxist-Leninist apologists. Because of its greater interest to philosophers, I shall devote the rest of this review to Axelos'",
"equations\" relative to ECF+, provable in H. Similarly, we obtain from MUC and the recursive density theorem for ECF the corresponding results for ECF+; the proof of QF-AC from the recursive density theorem also holds good for ECF+ [T1, 2.6.20]. So far, we have shown these basic facts about ECF+ to be provable in H, i.e. in EL + AC-NF; but we have to show that they can be established in EL + QF-AC. To complete the proof, we note that (10) EL + AC-NF is conservative over EL + QF-AC for formulae of Fo [T1, 3.6.18(i)] where Fo is defined as in [T1, 3.6.3]. (20) Almost negative predicates are transformed by the elimination translation r into almost negative predicates (by an induction on logical complexity), and therefore W+, I' are almost negative predicates; using this fact one then verifies that all basic properties of ECF+ needed can be expressed by means of formulae of F0. 2.2. REMARK. The method for constructing ECF+ as described here can also be used to construct a model ECFK of HA' + AC-NF in which the tape-2 objects are exactly the elements of K, and such that all the relevant closure conditions can be established in IDB,. ?3. The models for E-HA' + MUC. 3.1. Preliminaries. In discussing the term models for E-HA' + MUC, we find it actually more convenient to take as our starting point E-HA' + MUC*, where MUC* is the strengthening of MUC which states in addition to MUC",
"s work. As Bruzina points out in his Introduction (xxvi), Axelos' s work on Marx is part of a trilogy entitled Le deploiement de I'errance, which attempts to investigate the three alleged critical stages of Western thought: its beginnings, in Heraclite et la philosophie: La premiire saisie de Vetre en devenir de la totality; its culmination, in the present book, the original title of which is Marx, penseur de la technique: De I'alienation de Vhomme a la conquete du monde; and the transcending passage to a new way of thought, Vers la pensee planetaire: Le devenir-pensee du monde et le devenir-monde de la pensee. We are thus thrown into a study situating Marx as the culmination of Western, and particularly modern Western, thought. The interpretation of the tradition, and of Marx's place in it, is essentially Heideggerian; after Heraclitus's and Parmenides's attempts to think Being as logos and physis, Western thought began its fall into the confusion of Being with particular types of entities (Plato: idea; Aristotle: entelechyenergeia; Christianity: Being as God or ens increatum, ens perfectissimum; Descartes: man's mind as subject, all other entities as objects; and post-Cartesian thought, culminating in Hegel, Marx, and Nietzsche: human subjectivity as will which subdues and desolates the earth). Thus it can be seen at a glance that Axelos' s Marx is going to be neither the Marx of Marxism-Leninism (Heaven forbid!) nor of contemporary Marxology, i.e., the Marx of the Int J Phil Rel 12:59-64 (1981) 0020-7047/81/0121-0059 $00.90. ©1981 Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, The",
"is accordingly neither confined to, nor ought it to be judged merely by its relative success on, the historical plane. There is, further, a particular methodological angle which deserves our attention. In this post-Freudian age, psychobiography has come to the fore. Seigel is profoundly interested in Eric Erickson's psychohistorical approach, in terms of which he believes it possible to construct a dialectical analysis. It is well known that Marx's thought was deeply influenced by Hegel's. In this regard, following his psychohistorical inclination, Seigel makes the unusual suggestion that the little known Hegelian concept of inversion can function as a central thread with which to elucidate three specific incidents, so far unexplained in Marx's biography: Marx's passage to Hegelianism; as a guiding thread in his interpretation of Greek philosophy in his dissertation; and as a central element in Capital, whose unfinished status remained the great tragedy of Marx's life. On the abstract level, this strategy has considerable intrinsic interest. Transcending any mere assemblage of the documented or documentable facts about Marx's life, the interest here is clearly to tie together little understood events early and late in terms of a single explanatory principle which is intended to shed light on supposedly dark corners of Marx's life and thought. Rather than appealing to such frequently employed techniques as the patient collection of data, or the careful reassessment of the known events of Marx's life, or even the critical reinterpretation of his writings, a"
]
embeddings = model.encode(sentences)
similarities = model.similarity(embeddings, embeddings)
print(similarities.shape)
# [4, 4] 
