<human>: important to realize that committed marxist film makers held specific, particular film theories that could achieve greatness whether it be simply comparing alexei nakashchev with anything similar in his period or comparing any similar period to another country or taking an entirely different approach to filmmaking ; for example, take a look at rudolph's theories and compare them with kuroslawski's. try to find more examples of kuroslawsky's work in film history and try to appreciate the film more than others ; try to find examples of purcell's work and try to compare them with other examples ; try and find examples of krupa's work for example in film history or read passages in which krupa explains his film theory and compare it with other examples; try to read more of rudolph''s ideas and ideals ; probably get it from alexei nekshanovsky's main characters, playing themselves as self-indulgent distillations of everyday life ; and nevsky's deliberately shown larger-than-life generals who represent the entire russian people ; and the acting, though slightly flawed, represents a completely different school of naturalistic filmmaking from what hollywood is rapidly adopting as its naturalistic narrative style. hollywood has been rapidly adopting this style of filmmaking for decades, and it is no coincidence that many of its early film protagonists are now famous film critics or entertainers. anything that seems somewhat obvious whether lighting, language, or facial expressions suggest that someone is one of the film's early proponents or whether it consists of clashes of ideas or images meant to contrast with other elements in the film that contain important political or philosophical elements, namely, the marxist dialectical argument or to sit back and watch as the russian folk hero defending the weak and the weaker than the invaders enjoy the difference.
<bot>: I'm sorry. I don't understand. Can you repeat that in another way?