<human>: This is not a big deal, I am just more curious than anything. Youtube is not my job. I had a video on Youtube I made that demonstrated two flaws in the way McGraw Hill's website worked. They actually sent students the answers to questions WITH the question, they just didn't display it on the webpage. I showed people how to open the page source code and read the answer MGH sent them. I was fairly clear about how I did not intend the video to promote cheating, I was focusing on how bad design and not obscuring words (they literally had a line in the code that was labelled "Password:"). They stand on copyright grounds because (I assume) I showed images of their test questions and the inside of their book (about 4 pages, only a bit of text visible at a time, hardly worth trying to read). I did not claim to be from MGH, use their images, or any audio created by them. Would "fair use" cover me in this kind of situation? I do not intend to dispute the claim, they have more money than me and I just don't care. I am more curious if I really did something wrong or not. Thank you kindly for taking the time to read.

Can you condense the text into a few key points?
<bot>: My Youtube video showed the inside of a textbook and some test questions/answers. Did I really commit a crime?