<human>: Last year when my wife and I got a dog we began regularly going to the local dog park. One of the first people we met there was "Steve." Steve is a nice guy and talkative so we both got to know him. He's sort of dumb and has terrible taste but it's good having someone nice to talk to instead of sitting at the park silently. Anyway Chip mentioned a few times that he was on parole. I assumed it was for multiple DUIs because he mentioned a few of them but after hearing him make a lot of comments about women and once mentioning he wasn't allowed to have a Facebook account I looked up his record online. He was convicted of solicitation of a minor while in a position of authority. If I remember right it had an age range of something like 12-15. 

Eventually he and I kind of talked about it. He claimed without much detail that a girl said he touched her but that it was bullshit and a shitty lawyer convinced him to plead guilty.

I realize this is already way too long so I'll try to be succinct. He uses his mother's Facebook account to use Facebook and runs a Facebook page for the dog park. He just put a status update asking why a particular dog has been absent from the park lately. This dog is brought to the park by a young attractive high school girl. 

Steve has mentioned to me several times how he misses her and the dog. And one time when he and I were leaving the park and he saw her in the distance approaching he went back to the park to spend time with her.

Can you summarize the given text in a few sentences?
<bot>: Do I report a convicted sex offender acquaintance for violating his parole by using Facebook to contact and socially interact with an underage girl even if it is on a public page and I question if he is guilty of the crime he was convicted of?