<human>: The only time I have control of my binge-eating is the morning. Eating makes me want to eat, so in the morning, when I haven't eaten for hours, I have control. It's the only time in my entire day that I don't feel like I will explode if I don't stuff my face. And if I don't eat breakfast, I can then essentially fast for most of the day because my desire to eat just isn't there. But once I *do* eat "breakfast"--even if it's at 5pm--the seal is broken & I can't stop.

I *know* breakfast is important, & I *know* not eating it isn't good. That isn't the question. The question is which is the better of two evils: Stuffing my face from breakfast till bed, or fasting through the afternoon & then stuffing my face from the afternoon till bed. I can only see that helping, as it would enable me to eat probably around 2300 less calories per day, given how much I eat. Yet everyone seems to say that you should never, *ever* skip breakfast, and that doing so--even if you cut your calorie intake to just a third of what it is normally--will make you gain weight.

Once again, I reiterate that I'm not asking whether it's a *good* idea, but whether it's *less bad* than what I do normally. Or, more simply, will I lose weight doing this, or is breakfast so important that I will still gain weight?

Provide a brief overview of the text.
<bot>: The actual question... Which is less-bad: Eating a normal (normal for weight-loss) 1500 calories/day but missing breakfast, or eating 3800 calories but having eaten breakfast?