<human>: It seems to me that there are two major camps driving the culture of Pit Bull type breeds: the young, idealist, pasty white yuppies and hipsters that call their dogs pibbles and make ironic jokes about their dogs being monsters and licking your face versus biting it off.  They fight BSL and promote the breed against its "bad rap."

The other locus of culture are thugs who gravitate toward overly muscled, mean looking dogs with spiked collars, heavy chain leashes and tie downs, closely docked ears like devil's horns, etc. who promote the breed (or cross, etc.) for its bravado, powerful look, protection or even fighting prowess.

Now, as much as the hipster/yuppie/bleeding heart "they're a nanny dog!" crowd tries to fight the reputation as being from breed haters, they never seem to acknowledge that it's not hater who are poisoning the well for bully breeds, but people who love the breed AS a symbol of thug life.  It's really a war between one type of pit bull lover vs. another.

It's not even the fighting either. The thug promoters are often as far removed from fighting as body builders are from MMA.  They LOOK big and strong and capable of killing things, but it's all show, not ability. 

So reddit, who do you think the "good guys" have more to worry about, the anonymous "haters" or other pit bull "lovers" who keep the negative, threatening image alive.

Condense the text into a few key points
<bot>: Lovable Pibble promoters are being hurt more by Thugs who also love the bully breeds but emphasize a harsh image versus the masses who just don't like the bully breeds.