<human>: So quite a few people are pissed off right now.  Some are pissed at the government, some at corporations, and some people are just always fucking miserable.  The one thing that everyone seems to be able to agree on is that corruption in business and politics seems to play a pretty big role in why stuff sucks at the moment.  So how about this...

We come up with a completely objective psychological evaluation, like the SAT for mental health, to figure out if people are fucktards who will immediately abuse their power once they get it.  Make it like an IQ test.  100 is average, 150 is like, fucking Jesus, and 50 is Caligula.  Have a people's movement to encourage people who run for office to take the test, and post the results.  Wondering if your candidate of choice is secretly a prick behind all the televised politispeach? BOOM, number's right there.  No need to exhaust yourself doing research to figure out if their a donkey raping shit eater.  

A few things.  It would have to be blind to political leanings and as objective as possible.  You can't say like "feeding all the poor is good" because there are too many moral ambiguities.  It would have to prove that, given the choice between doing something that would benefit society, and something that would benefit just them and their butt buddy, they would chose them and their butt buddy.  SECOND:  It would have to be tricky.  *most* politicians are pretty smart people.  They would probably be able to figure out how to game the test if you make it too obvious.  Maybe say on their way out of the test that you can rig their results for a price, and if they go with it...GOTCHA!  

So what do you think?  Could it be done?  Is something like that possible, or are there just too many fuzzy lines when it comes to morality and ethics?

Can you summarize the given text in a few sentences?
<bot>: Corruption plays a big part in making the world shittier than it needs to be.  Can a test be made to test politicians/leaders on their morality and overall corruptibility?