<human>: Can you succinctly summarize the text in 1-3 sentences?

I know this is probably a controversial subject. Maybe? I'm not actually sure how people feel about this but give me your opinions on it. Today as I read an article by YahooNews! here's the link if you're curious...  it really had me questioning the entire approach and method that the justice system uses. The title is "Woman Removed After Outburst During James Holmes' Court Appearance." As I read it there were only actually two lines on the woman mentioned in the title... and they make the woman seem like a raving lunatic. She stood up and said these things, "I tried to deliver information vital to the defense of James Holmes to the public defender... It will do the victims' families justice to have this information." As I looked further into Allison Ernst I learned a few strange things... through her linkedin profile 
What is strange is that Allison is in fact an attorney in Colorado. Maybe it's a different Allison Ernst. Who knows maybe there are hundreds of other Allison Ernst's in Colorado but then I looked at where she worked Pueblo, Colorado... very close to where Holmes has his trial. These are all theories but what if this Allison Ernst has information that would make James Holmes unable to plead not guilty by reason of insanity. That's the kind of information that would help the victims families and friends find justice. This was a tragedy and it would be unfair to watch the justice system allow another senseless murderer take the easy way out. Another odd thing is that I posted a comment on yahoo... not once but three times and each time it was immediately removed within seconds. Well maybe it will get some of my fellow redditors thinking. Sorry for the long post. What are your thoughts?
<bot>: James Holmes is being allowed to plead not guilty by reason of insanity. Strange woman appears in court may or may not be an attorney in Colorado who has vital information that could help victims families find justice...