<human>: It's pretty obvious that the mechanical engineering students require more resources and money than English students.  As a humanities major, I find it a bit unfair that I am charged the same tuition as a science major, when my department is allocated way less resources.  Even as a student, I'm not allowed to access some of the resources that I pay for.  Our school has a thing that makes the user feel weightless, and it is used to train astronauts and conduct experiments and such.  However, it is only available for the science kids to use (and they can use it just to feel how cool it is, not for research purposes).  Another example is the journalism school, which has these really expensive Mac computers that are not available to any other students...I don't personally need them, but I could see why a graphics design major might find them useful.

Also, there is a huge difference between the pay that they offer a business professor versus what they offer a history professor.  The business school is prioritized higher, so the students have better professors.  Yet a history major pays the same amount of money as a business major for perhaps a lesser quality education.

Can you condense the text into three sentences or less?
<bot>: I think that they should charge tuition based on the percentage of funds allocated towards your department (by the University, not by independent donors).  Do you think that this would be a fair system, and why or why not?