<human>: Hey all, I am an undergraduate student at Penn State. I am a hardworking redditor who feels like I deserve an A in this basic Human Development and Family Studies class. 
Let me explain... I have received a 100, 94, 94, and 86 on the exams. The class is also composed of one-minute papers which are essentially little bull shit responses to questions that the teacher presents. In order to get an A in the class, I needed to receive 5/5 points for the final one minute paper. I received 3. 
The question was simple: What did you like most about the class; what did you like least?
I answered: I enjoyed learning about adult development since I had not previously learned about that in my other developmental classes. I did not enjoy the section on infancy, since many other courses discuss this and students may find it repetitive and unnecessary.
You would think that since I answered the question that I would get full credit, right? WRONG.
I received this response from the TA when questioning the grade:
" It is stated in the syllabus "... to receive full-credit, students' responses must illustrate thought and depth". Because you only wrote 3 sentences and only answered the question, but not elaborate I could not give you full credit."
Essentially answering the question fully in three sentences is not correct, but writing a  bullshit answer that is slightly longer is OK.

I am desperate to get an A in this course, but I am horrible at effectively arguing. I am hoping that one of my fellow redditors could suggest an appropriate response that could possibly change the TA's mind.
Thank you so much for your time!

Can you condense the text into a few key points?
<bot>: Answered a question but didn't bullshit it, so I didn't get an A in my class...help me convince the TA to change her mind.