<human>: Could you distill the essence of the text into 1-3 sentences?

Ok, so the FBI is allowed to stick a GPS monitor on your car to track you, and they are allowed to do this because they don't get any extra information from the device compared to standard tailing.

But these GPS devices are pretty large with the batteries on the outside, and they are typically stuck in places you wouldn't see them like on the underside of the car. Now the underside of the car typically is flat(ish) to take advantage of the Laminar flow of air and reduce drag, thus reducing costs. But by placing such an obstructing device they are increasing drag, and even if it's only a few extra cents of fuel per mile that adds up quickly over time and distance driven. This means they are essentially taxing you without telling you, this could represent loss of income in the hundreds of dollar ranges if left on long enough. Then you also have the issue of a large object on the bottom of your car that can potentially hurt the undercarriage when the car bottoms out or goes over a pothole or something which is a safety hazard.

IANAL (w/ a condom), but is this valid?
<bot>: FBI tracking GPS is costing you money though parasitic drag and making your care more liable to be injured, so shouldn't you be getting an itemized receipt for the cost or a reimbursement?