<human>: *sorry for poor formatting, on phone*
    
I started seeing this guy, casually, but he dropped the bomb on the first date that he doesn't live in my state, as a matter of fact, he has an apartment in another state, but is in my state for work for the next few months (or more, or less). His job sends him all over the state, and his schedule constantly changes. He was very upfront when we started hanging out that the next three weekends, he had already purchased tickets home. 
    
Well. I decided right then and there to not invest myself in this and take it seriously, if he was that interested, he could come to me. And he did. 
    
I initially 'resisted' when he left town, didnt really engage in the conversation, one word answers, etc. But he kept texting me. We're still chatting a little over a month later, but I haven't seen him in the past three weeks and he's not sure if he'll be in my area again soon. I finally brought up what the point of all of this is, neither one of us is gaining anything from this. He admits that I have a point, but he likes talking to me and he thought this would be easier, that he'd be back in my part of town, but his schedule has been changing so much, he's not sure. I have a very busy schedule as well, I work 5 days a week, 3 of which are 13 hour shifts and I'm applying to grad school, so something casual suits me, I have my own shit going on.
    
I'm not sure I have anything to lose by continuing to chat with him, but also not sure I'm gaining anything. Just wanting a third party opinion.

Can you condense the text into three sentences or less?
<bot>: Seeing/chatting with a guy long distance, we're both interested, but I'm also not entirely sure it's worth my effort.