<human>: My bf and I dated a year, a few months of which I was overseas. We knew from the start of the relationship that I would eventually move overseas for a few years, but decided to pursue the relationship nonetheless. As things got more serious between us, we discussed the possibility of marriage and his willingness to wait for me to come back to the US. However, about a month ago, we decided to break things off as the prospect of being apart for so long made dating sort of impractical, having struggled with the distance during the few months I was gone. 

We were very good friends before dating, so we both hoped to stay friends after the breakup. In the beginning it was really hard (we hooked up twice) and realized we needed to take some time apart before trying to be friends. It's been a few weeks at this point, and although I know I'm not over him or the relationship yet, I want to hang out. Were this a typical breakup, I'd give myself a lot more time with little to no contact before trying to be friends. But I'm only here for another month and a half or so. PLUS, we waited so long for us to be together again after doing long distance that I want to enjoy hanging out in the same town, even if it's just as friends. 

I know everyone advocates on here for "no contact" post-breakup, but since we're going to be apart when I move overseas anyways, why not just enjoy each other's company while we can?

Condense the text into a few key points
<bot>: Mutual breakup with bf of 1 year, moving overseas in 6 weeks. Is it so wrong to stay friends until I move, even though we're not over the relationship yet?