<human>: Three examples:

1.  A 13-year-old kid argues that 13 times 13 doesn't equal 169.  You proceed to prove it to him, and his response is "There are never exact numbers in practice, so you're not *exactly* right."

2. You say "There's no time like the present."  Your friend says "You can't prove that is true, time could be cyclic."

3. During a debate, you say "Priests molesting children is an important issue, it absolutely needs to be stopped."  Your opponent says, "Well, nothing is absolutely true.  We could all be in the matrix right now, so it's possible it doesn't really matter what anyone does!"

They cannot take losing the argument, so their mind twists and warps reality to seek any form of being right, even if it just means making you somewhat wrong.  Sometimes, like in my second example, this is not even an argument they are picking apart.  They just want to feel superior, even if that means being... this way.  What is this way, and how do I combat it?

Can you succinctly summarize the text in 1-3 sentences?
<bot>: What is it called when someone steps back from the topic at hand to claim you are wrong by merely citing a completely normal level of situational uncertainty?