<human>: I was watching a documentary on the Aryan Brotherhood and one of the high ranking members who had claimed to kill 20ish inmates in prison left the group because they killed someone's innocent father to send a message. He felt compelled to leave the group because he felt killing an "innocent" man went against his moral code. It made me think a lot about how flexible morality is for some people.

I have similar lines for myself, I've done some definitively immoral things and I just realized one of these lines. I recently found out I got an STD (genital warts) and I have slept with one girl since finding out and I wore a condom. I hate condoms like every other guy and usually don't use one even if I'm hooking up with a girl for the first time (in fact I have only ever used a condom the first time sleeping with someone on 2 occasions prior to this). I had no intention of telling the girl before or after sex that I had an STD and felt no guilt about it (clearly not the right thing to do). Despite this I felt an intense moral obligation to wear a condom even though it is clearly immoral to not tell her before or after the act that I have HPV. I did some thinking and while I still do not intend on disclosing I have HPV for random hookups I literally can not even fathom the idea of knowing I have it and not wearing a condom with a girl when she doesn't know I have it. 

I know that I should always use condoms with new partners, disclose I have an STD, etc. so I'd prefer to not get a lecture by anyone.

Condense the text into a few key points
<bot>: Morals can be flexible, what are some things you feel/don't feel guilt about that go against society's idea of "the right thing to do"?