<human>: I live in a house with 10 guys (including me), and this past Friday one of the guys I live with threw his friend a birthday party. He emailed us beforehand and asked permission before throwing it, so we all knew it was happening. I was hanging out with some friends elsewhere, but he made it clear we could come to the party if we wanted.

At some point during the night, someone stole another roommate's wii, controllers, games, etc. totaling $150 from the common room. 

He sent out an email today asking if we'd be willing to pay for it collectively from the slush fund we've set up for parties (keep in mind the party being thrown was not a slush-fund party). 

I've never played the wii and I don't have any intention of playing the wii if he gets it replaced, but as I understand it a majority of the guys in-house have played the wii before. He put it in the common room but we never talked about what would happen if it got stolen. 

Over email, we've all been talking about how to pay for it. It seems like everyone who plays the wii wants to pay for it collectively, while the few people who don't play it don't want to pay. 

I think he should pay for it on his own, and if the people who play it regularly want to chip in, that would be really cool of them. 

Am I right to think I shouldn't be on the hook for this?

Can you condense the text into three sentences or less?
<bot>: Roommate threw a party and someone stole another roommate's wii from the common room. He wants us to pay together, but I don't think it's our responsibility. Am I wrong?