<human>: i liked the columbo movie atmosphere and the real-life thriller approach, even though it sometimes reminded me of old-fashioned filmmaking. the first few minutes of this movie were really nice, done in a good old-fashioned way with good camera work and lighting, and the movie became brilliant, even though i was somewhat underwhelmed by the movie's final, decent score. consider a recent movie that features a good, well-known character. then, add a bad one. the problem is that modern columbo movies always feature good, well known actors in opposing roles. peter, the main character, plays a total opposite to peter, the murderer. peter plays a good role as the good, old colonel, but peter also plays a bad role as the bad colonel. both problems make modern columba movies seem worse than they really are. must say though, that movie features peter as the bad guy, he certainly plays a better role and plays a more consistent, good performance throughout the movie. probably also due to movie director dalek dake also directed really dreadful movie taiwan among many projects it rather good and enjoyable story sort plot cover murder used earlier in the movie also help got used movie columbo playback nevertheless still plenty enough original moments even though course every colonos movie has less same of well made colonos series but great consistent break-in and fix it or it also has some true plot clues like usual colonos murderer or stupid plot writers overly enthusiastically make the movie a bad fact and perhaps even makes columbo seem hard working or discovering some important clues but luckily the movie is also filled with entertaining, effective and relaxing columbo comedies or simply good late colonos movies entry.
<bot>: I'm sorry. I don't understand. Can you repeat that in another way?