<human>: Can you provide a brief rundown of the text in within 3 sentences?

Allow me to elaborate. I always thought that democracy, for all its wonders, is not really democratic. I had always understood that democracy is the rule of the many, but that rule ends with only a few choices, mainly conservative and liberal parties. But once the elections are over, we the people leave the politicians to their own devices and we get mad at them almost immediately.

I always imagined something more efficient. A council of know-it-alls, scientists, business people, professionals, people who are leaders in their respective fields would be voted in by their respective communities. The council would be our government. But they do not dictate the law. Instead they would debate the issues and bring forward suggestions and possible new legislations and all that stuff to what I call a, or the, Collective Voice.

With the advent of social media and networking, the Collective Voice is us, the masses, the general public. We might get texts, emails, small little polls, whatever the medium, we'd get an interactive say in politics. In the same way we can choose to vote, we can choose to participate in these frequent specific votes. I'm sure the technicalities of such a system are not beyond our capabilities.

If it affects you personal you might feel compelled to vote in, if not, who gives a damn? If you're a heavy internet user, then laws that might affect your usage will be your main concern, if it's about immigration, perhaps not so much. In this way, a number of relevant voters will chime in and decide for the governing council. A middle department can take charge of interpreting the raw feedback from the people to present a final number that will dictate whether new laws come into effect.

The governing body, the council, and the country's most powerful individuals will all answer to the Collective Voice, the virtual embodiment of the general public. You would have no singular powerful people in politics, not on the Collective Voice's watch.

With no parties and no opposing sides in politics, this type of ad hoc government would do plenty of good, I think.

All hail the Collective Voice!

What say you Reddit?
<bot>: The law and the government would be subject to a decision process based on social media, letting the general public decide what's law. Is this feasible?