<human>: Can you provide a brief overview of the text?

Clarification: we're not the mayors of that tiny town from Footloose. Just two people who aren't really into dancing.

We're planning on having a first dance to a meaningful song, but neither of us are super pumped about the idea of having to dance all night at the reception (yes--it would be the feeling of *having to* dance, not *getting to* spend a night dancing). On top of that, the wedding will mostly be family. Although some friends are attending, no one is really the partying type.

The problem we're facing is, if there's no dancing... what do people do? I don't have a problem with a nice dinner party-type reception in theory, but do guests secretly hate those and find them boring? At every wedding either of us have gone to, the wedding party and/or DJ typically has to go around coercing people into dancing, and there aren't ever more than a dozen people on the dance floor at a given time. Forcing people to dance just seems kind of lame to me, and I don't want to spend the big day worried that people aren't having enough of a good time. (Note: these weddings had good DJs and decent, danceable music).

I doubt we would have a strict NO DANCING wedding, just thinking more along the lines of a DJ/band playing background music mostly. Maybe some danceable tunes if people want to get up and dance, but we don't want it to be the focal point of the night. 

Thoughts? Should we tough it out and do the dancing thing anyway? If we don't have dancing as the center focus of the wedding, what should we do (not really in a venue that has room for "lawn games," although we could make those work. just worried about the trend factor there, too.)? If we don't do dancing, should we still pay for a DJ/band?
<bot>: Is it okay to not have dancing as a part of the wedding, and if so, what should we do instead?