<human>: Give me the gist of the text in a nutshell

I'm especially talking to everyone using adblock:  
You are so "anty-sopa" "anty-censorship" and your arguments are about that google, youtube, facebook etc. wouldn't be able to exist in their form, well think, if everyone would use adblock they would just perish. That's what you want? Isn't it a little hypocrisy?     
If everyone had adblock, only gov sites and maybe few that get money from people would survive.  
 I'm fair (in my understanding of fairness). If adverts on page are too annoying, block my view etc. i just block them and don't give a fuck, it's two clicks on opera, other browsers probably have something similar. But why would i cut someone who is giving me something (free knowledge etc) while not disturbing me from surfing the web from their revenue?  
 Recently a lot of people whine about ads on youtube, i think they do it just because they are ads. When they are long you can skip them, so what's the problem. And i even watched few to the end because i was curious (they are not so dull as ads in tv, because, well, you can skip them).  
I think, for some people sites should be totally free, without any ads with super fast load, full of unicorns and other rainbows. Unfortunately unicorns aren't so popular nowadays, because world doesn't work that way.
<bot>: Why are you so hypocritical when on one side you are anty-sopa, and on the other you take the only revenue of most sites?