<human>: I think responsibility is two-fold, I believe you can only be responsible for something if you have elements of control over outcomes through your choices, and if you choose to accept said responsibility. (E.g. you accept responsibility of cleaning toilets by becoming a toilet cleaner)

However, saying a man who rejects his responsibility to help others, and lets a baby drowning die, is not responsible seems intuitively wrong. if you reject your responsibility, are you no longer responsible? 
And on the other hand, removing responsibility acceptance and saying ability alone causes responsibility seems wrong also...I can't accept that because a person has e.g. wealth, they have a responsibility to all others who need money.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts and reasoning.

Can you condense the text into three sentences or less?
<bot>: Where does responsibility come from and what warrants it? Looking to avoid "God" or anything circular (e.g. It's the right thing to do because it is, you have responsibility because you do etc)