<human>: Summarize the given text in a few sentences.

Something I've gradually come to believe, in examining my own uselessness (I'm a man) is that men are completely superfluous in a scientifically advanced race.  As a evolutionary element, they are designed to be the 'pollen release' of the human race - the mechanism by which genetic diversity was transmitted from tribe to tribe; hence the hardened, physically unappealing exterior.  

In an advanced species, you need a compact capacity to procreate; but having an entirely additional physical being to accomplish this is a collosal waste of time and space.  Any colonization effort would by necessity be almost entirely female (with 'progressive' reproduction technologies it would be 100% female).  Women carry the capacity to reproduce entirely within themselves; given the right hardware it's even possible for them to interbreed.  

While it's a little uncomfortable (as a man) - I am left to wonder, what is the point of men, particularly in the post-biological sciences world?  They aren't required in a universe dominated by machines; testosterone is an extremely volatile hormone that is used to drive the aforementioned 'lone wolf' behaviours.  Do men serve a significant purpose?  

With the right breeding programs, an all-lesbian (or asexual) female human race could have just as much genetic diversity and survability while abandoning the 'pollen carrier' half of the species that serves only to drain 'un-re-productive' (pardon the pun) resources that could otherwise be spent making more girls.  Men seem like a massively unnecessary component in making more humans.  

Is there a vital positive men provide I'm missing, or will manhood be outlawed by mutual consent in the next 200 years (I being of the naive group who believe ultimately all good things will come to pass)?
<bot>: Men are superfluous to a technologically advanced human race; procreation and advance are possible entirely without men in a more efficient fashion.  Am I missing something?