<human>: The ADA is supposed to be a good thing.  However, I am an Anatomy and Physiology professor. Most of my students end up entering into nursing, medical assisting, or EMT programs. Every semester, students present me with accommodation notices from our student services office at the college. These include requests for things like front row seating or extra time for testing. I don't really mind the extra time for testing but lately I have been presented with accommodations that require a reader for the exams. I don't have to do any extra work, other than sending a copy of the exam to student services so they can record it.
This really upsets me. I understand the need of our college to provide wheelchair access but to provide readers for someone with learning disabilities is wrong, especially in the medical field. These people might be called on to take care of me or my family one day in a hospital. Will the hospital provide someone to read my orders to these people? Potential employees would not be able to tell the difference between a student who apparently couldn't read their own tests and those that could. Our school doesn't give out diplomas with asterisks (*student graduated but didn't have to read their own tests). I complained to someone at the college once and was asked if I wanted to "deny these students federally mandated rights"?
I would love to play in the NBA, but I can't compete with the pro's height, endurance or shooting ability. I don't think they should have to accommodate me either. If a student can't do the work other students do, why should they be allowed to get the same degree?
I think they need to choose a different career- preferably one where little reading mistakes can lead to the death of a patient. What do you think? Anybody out there ever been in this situation?

Give me a shortened version of the text
<bot>: The ADA lets nursing students in my school have readers for their exams and I think its BS- what do you think?