<human>: Can you give me a shortened version of the text?

45ish percent of adult Americans  are single. Me knowing this does *not* make me feel better. It just means that we're cursed to be attracted to someone more attractive than ourselves, probably more than 50 percent of the time, because people settle. I myself am only attracted to probably far less than ten percent, considering that I wouldn't date anyone far older, but not the point, I just *REALLY* wish that people would be straight about this problem as it is obviously a problem for us all, rather than "you will find someone some day just b urself." I am SERIOUS when I say I would feel more attached to a sex android, for the fact that that robot will not resent you. I'd rather it be souless than me have to sit there either not being attracted to it or it not being attracted to me, wondering when it is going to betray me. I wish people would get their priorities straight and admit that the robot significant other idea is for the best, rather than actually condemming it of which I have seen happen with bots that are not even anything to scream about. It should be our number one priority, but no because RELIGION. "*I-it's soulless and you're creepy Anon*" and  "what if t-1thousand blah lbah it will not be safe for the children to be around because improper programming this is not megaman anon" and plz why so stupid? It'd cost so much money no one would go for it anyway, and so therein lies the problem I guess. How long will I have to wait before a more athiest country like Japan (of course) makes one with half decent ai enough to act cute and not respond to anyone but it's owner, and make me a sandwhich basically? Complicated maths need to be worked on and I don't see enough media coverage to give me hope. In spite of myself I just found my own post rather funny, but no seriously I really do feel this way and that it is for the best.
<bot>: We are in serious need of sex bots or love bots for the fact that 45ish percent of adult Americans are single.