<human>: Provide a brief overview of the text.

I'm a big fan of the populist aspect of not having a leader and the idea of letting everyone act as one person, but I think if OWS wants to sustain itself its going to need leadership to keep the protesters in order. I heard about the Occupy DC participants who managed to get the National Air and Space museum closed for a day after physically assaulting a guard there. I understand that people are fed up with the wars too (although I think the drone program deserves the least amount of criticism of all military programs that exist...), but small actions like this will discredit the entire movement. Unless the OWS movement stays focused to its original goal of financial equality it will splinter into 100 different groups advocating everything from LGBT equality to legalizing pot. OWS has the potential to be one of the most successful non-violent movements in history, but not if it turns to chaos and shuts down science museums. What does reddit think?
<bot>: The OWS movement should have a leader to prevent it from splintering into smaller interest groups, agree or disagree?