<human>: Can you provide a brief rundown of the text in within 3 sentences?

I'm angry, but stay with me here: the situation with the OWS protests seems to boil down to: people exercising their right to assemble, government is getting "annoyed" by it. Last time I checked, though, the Bill of Rights doesn't give us the "right to assemble until the forces in control grow tired of it." So what is the government's actual excuse? Can they truly simply break them up because they want to? Are we living in that type of totalitarian regime?!

It seems like circular logic- "we pepper sprayed them because they wouldn't move" Yes, but, *why were you asking them to move in the first place?* "because they wouldn't move?" I don't get it.
<bot>: If the people responsible for breaking up the protests were required to give legal reasoning for their actions (evicting protestors, pepper spraying protestors) would they have any legal ground to stand on?