of all the major republicans, the one who comes closest to my worldview is newt gingrich. despite his erratically shifting views and odd phases, he continually returns to this core political refrain: he talks about using government in energetic but limited ways to increase growth, dynamism and social mobility. as he said in 2007, “it’s not a point of view libertarians would embrace, but i am more in the alexander hamilton-teddy roosevelt tradition of conservatism. i recognize that there are times when you need government to help spur private enterprise and economic development.” look at american history, gingrich continued, “the government provided railroad land grants to encourage widespread adoption of what was then the most modern form of transportation to develop our country. the homestead act essentially gave away land to those willing to live on it and develop it. we used what were in effect public-private partnerships to bring telephone service and electricity to every community in our nation. all of these are examples of government bringing about public purposes without creating massive taxpayer-funded bureaucracies.” this was not one of gingrich’s passing fads. it is one of the most consistent themes of his career. his 1984 book, “window of opportunity,” is a broadside against what he calls the “laissez-faire” conservatism — the idea that government should just get out of the way so the market can flourish. as he wrote, “the opportunity society calls not for a laissez-faire society in which the economic world is a neutral jungle of purely random individual behavior, but for forceful government intervention on behalf of growth and opportunity.”
is meghan markle already preparing a bid to be america's first woman president?