saker message: no current saker messages. why hillary clinton will appoint old world nationalists to cabinet positions and the quasi-legal coup-hillary clinton information operations in election 2016 3178 views november 07, 2016 19 comments analyses the saker 




by gh eliason 




whether you are for hillary clinton or against her, the problem with hillary clinton isn<u+2019>t her lack of experience. almost the entire political establishment is behind her. throughout all the bumps and scandal in this whole election cycle, republicans and former presidents are coming out of the woodwork supporting her. according to the la times she may well be one of the most experienced candidates in us history, while even accounting for severe conflicts of interest inside the clinton foundation. neither friend or foe doubt hillary clinton<u+2019>s experience after 30 years in politics. 




the problem is even hillary clinton<u+2019>s friends say she has a history of acting without thinking, of making bad decisions. according to neera tanden : <u+201c>almost no one knows better than me that her instincts can be terrible.<u+201d> 




does hillary clinton show bad instincts and terrible decision-making skills, and if she does, how will this affect the usa? 




according to journalist robert parry <u+201c>the people that will be taking senior positions and especially in foreign policy believe <u+201c>this consensus is driven by a broad-based backlash against a president who has repeatedly stressed the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the middle east<u+2026> taken together, the studies and reports call for more aggressive american action to constrain iran, rein in the chaos in the middle east and check russia in europe.<u+201d>one of the lead organizations revving up these military adventures and also counting on a big boost in military spending under president clinton-45 is the atlantic council, a think tank associated with nato that has been pushing for a major confrontation with nuclear-armed russia.<u+201d> 




the atlantic council is the think tank for the ceec which is associated with nato. the ceec (central and eastern european coalition) has only one goal. at the beginning of the presidential campaign they put out a small list of questions for the candidates to decide who they would support for the president. 




the first question was essentially <u+201c>are you willing to go to war with russia?<u+201d> hillary clinton has answered that question and received their unqualified support throughout the campaign. who is the ceec? 




the central and eastern european coalition represent the various central and eastern european countries to the us government. what makes them special in an election is that they control a 20 million person strong bloc vote in key states across the country and sway elections by themselves. the price of a clinton win is war with russia. 




if that seems a little too much to be believable, reconsider the iraq war. all it took was for the iraqi diaspora to develop strong ties with like-minded people from <u+201c>the project for the new american century<u+201d> that wanted regime change in iraq. many of the people associated with the pnac crossed over into the bush administration . they pushed the invasion together. 




<u+201c> walt vanderbush<u+2019>s essay, <u+201c>the iraqi diaspora and the us invasion of iraq<u+201d> (chapter 9), traces the collaboration between leaders of the iraqi diaspora and neoconservative americans, many of them linked to the iraqi national congress (inc) and the project for the new american century (pnac), to convince the us government to wage war and bring about <u+201c>regime change<u+201d> in iraq<u+2026> the inc claimed credit for placing 108 articles in the news media, including the new york times, the washington post, and the times (of london), during a nine-month period before the war.<u+201d> 




it wasn<u+2019>t terror, osama, or even oil that the iraq war was fought for. it was a guy named ahmed chalabi who was the only victor of the iraq war. 




american-emigre groups use their strategically settled populations in key battleground states, deep pockets, and unbridled political ambition to gain control over their home <u+201c>old<u+201d> countries. even more insidious is the influence they exert over the united states to destroy old enemies. 




do we want senior cabinet and policy positions filled by people that think starting wwiii is a good goal? let<u+2019>s take a look at the make-up and politics of some of these. 




starting at the top let<u+2019>s look at the ukrainian emigres which lead the ceec and the atlantic council. one thing anyone represented by the ucca (ukrainian congressional committee of america) or the uwc (ukrainian world congress) has in common is axis-political heritage and beliefs. the oun is the political grouping of ukrainian nationalists and it would vote for adolf hitler if he was running in a heartbeat. 




unless real nazi political views (not neo-nazi) found a way to survive all these years with this group of people, the statement is just insulting. anyone reading should be insulted because that level of offensiveness in a politically charged environment is wrong. 




nazism or axis-nazism are political beliefs and principles that structure your government the same as republican or democratic control would. the only difference is the <u+201c>ism.<u+201d> the <u+201c>ism<u+201d> means everything you do in your life revolves around your politic so it<u+2019>s not just political or social guides or guidelines. it<u+2019>s your lifestyle and everything wraps around it. anything or anyone that goes against it is an enemy of the state, and it is personal. 




from their own words in the ukrainian weekly, real, active political nazi<u+2019>s are alive, kickin<u+2019> and ready for a clinton win! it is the sheer number of groups self-identifying as practicing real nazi beliefs in the us gaining policy and cabinet positions under a clinton win that is incredible. 




the ukrainian world congress with its affiliates in over 40 countries and others work tirelessly in trying to keep ukraine and the ukrainian spirit front and center. 




<u+201c>we have had a minister of finance, natalka jaresko, in the cabinet. we now have ulana suprun as acting minister of health. we have many from the diaspora assisting with strategizing, reforming and supporting the overall cause. we have a highly successful program in patriot defence. we are out to change the way business is done. 




unity to act when required has been the diaspora<u+2019>s mantra <u+2013> this cannot be disputed. 




as time moves on, we see that things take a natural course. we see that two wings of the oun <u+2013> (ounb)banderivtsi and (ounm)melnykivtsi <u+2013> are working actively on the international level, working in partnership and currently are in strong negotiations about becoming a single entity again.<u+201d> 




with all you<u+2019>ve heard about stepan bandera<u+2019>s oun since the maidan coup in ukraine, i<u+2019>ll bet you didn<u+2019>t know they call new york, chicago, boston, and philadelphia home. 




the ucca and the uwc still celebrate their nazi ss because they are still axis-nazis. the oun were the vile holocaust murderers during and after wwii and their politics live on in their children today. this is no different from the children of other waffen-ss leaders or if hitler had surviving children that stood up and ran other countries based in hitler<u+2019>s policy. these american kids are sent to ukraine to learn how to copy and act like stepan bandera before they come back to america and get involved in policy making. 




<u+201c> ounb leader ivan kobasa also took responsibility of making sure the ukrainian-americans received the proper secondary education at ukrainian nationalist schools(maup) in ukraine. from the mid-2000<u+2019>s enrollment in this educational system has skyrocketed. today almost all members of the current ukrainian government are graduates of this ideological system that was taught to them by moderates like david duke who is also a graduate of the maup system.<u+201d> 




while american media criticizes david duke<u+2019>s support for donald trump, they say nothing about hillary<u+2019>s strongest supporters hiring david duke as a professor to teach their children college level history. is hillary clinton too far right for david duke? after all, he has no plans to conquer russia. 




when you look at her campaign coffers and the most active political activists supporting hillary clinton, many are groups whose politics are not republican or democrat, but old-world nationalist. they are spread across america and still idolize their waffen ss heroes, literally. they have statues and holidays and children<u+2019>s groups across america in cities like new york, boston, philadelphia, and chicago celebrating some of the vilest mass murderers in history. and they teach their children to idolize them and grow up using them as role models. they also bring up their children in the same political mold of ultra-nationalism. 




now they want an america that will do the same. over the last 30 years, the old world nationalists have moved into media and policy positions to make this happen. if that wasn<u+2019>t enough they control a 20 million person bloc vote in key states and swing states in important cities across america. 




i am not using the word nazi as an insult, this isn<u+2019>t neo-nazi or even a nazi revival. these groups have been the most extreme political activists in the usa over the last 50 years and are a continuation of what their parents were in the 1930<u+2019>s. in their own words, they never assimilated into american culture. they assimilated the culture to them. in the words of the cia, they are political animals. today, their wagons are circled around a hillary clinton presidency. 




the oun were the guards at the holocaust prison camps, waffen ss, and volunteer brigades that were famous for torture and murder. in ukraine, they killed over 3 million people and conducted the first act of holocaust at babi yar. 




the funny part if there was one is that with every fiber of your being, you want to argue against these facts. the oun on the other hand featured at least one of my articles on their rise in american politics even though i called them devils. the fact they find me credible shouldn<u+2019>t get lost on you. 




when these good friends of hillary clinton from the ceec start getting tapped for advisory posts, and cabinet positions through the atlantic council or project for a new american century, will they automatically become democrats or republicans? 




does america want a war with russia so the losers of wwii can settle old scores? 




for the first time, under a clinton presidency, america will have unbridled axis-nazis/old world nationalists/ nazis in most of the cabinet and policy positions. they are getting the positions because they are delivering donations, bloc votes, political propaganda, and hard activism in battleground states. 




the results for the clinton campaign in emigre dominated states is the same as it was when they first got together. clinton is up by 11 points in important emigre bloc voting districts. 




<u+2026>in last month<u+2019>s heavily publicized pennsylvania senate race. ukrainian and baltic groups, protesting the administration<u+2019>s attempts to prevent the break-up of the ussr, supported the democratic candidate, harris wofford. this position contributed to the defeat of dick thornburgh, a former attorney general in the bush administration<u+2026>.<u+201d>the ukrainian weekly, december 8, 1991, no. 49, vol. lix 




in a ukraine weekly interview with candidate bill clinton-<u+201c>for the last 40 years, many ukrainians have been supporters of the republican party. however, mr. bush severely damaged his relations with ukrainians with his <u+201c>chicken kiev<u+201d> speech, and by his unwillingness to see ukraine<u+2019>s point of view in disputes with russia. how will your party seek to secure the goodwill of voters concerned by this issue?<u+201d> <u+2026> 




clinton<u+2019>s answer<u+2026><u+201c>the bush administration has had a spotty record abroad<u+2026>including the president<u+2019>s insulting warning against <u+201c>suicidal nationalism<u+201d> made before proindependence forces in kiev in the summer of 1991 <u+2014> and a failed economic record at home. we hope ukrainian americans will join our effort to put people first.<u+201d> <u+2013> interview with candidate bill clinton-ukrainian weekly issue 43, 1992 




in what has become the ultimate pay to play scheme, the clinton<u+2019>s gave over ukraine to ounb nationalists to run as they saw fit. this was payment for political support and bloc votes that won the 1992 elections for bill clinton. american citizens were given a country to run and represent in any manner they chose to do it. 




according to ukrainian nationalist scholar taras kuzio , the axis- nazi political beliefs started to be taught to children in ukraine after the ounb took the reins. this was the preparation for what would become a nationalist coup in 2014 ukraine. 




this pattern follows the clinton-nato expansion and every cee (central and eastern european) country freed by the clintons followed suit. in croatia, croatian-americans have more parliamentary seats and representation than any group from croatia. 




other than american-emigre groups gaining rule and representing the <u+201c>home country<u+201d> in the us, there is only one other universal factor each of them revived. axis- nazi politics and political views became normal in their home countries. in croatia, they even revived the waffen ss battalions. 




the people at the ceec are behind the atlantic council and pnac will be making the domestic and foreign policy decisions in a clinton administration. while i would not call hillary clinton a nazi, the people she surrounds herself with actively are. there is very little doubt that victoria nuland, a ukrainian-american brought up in these beliefs will be secretary of state under a clinton administration. 




to get an understanding of what that means, the same people that are deciding ukrainian domestic and foreign policy will be sending their people to those cabinet positions. 




the one thing for sure is even publications that support her candidacy wonder about hillary clinton<u+2019>s lack of judgment and surrounding herself with nationalist war-hawks that want war with russia. 




according to the week <u+201c>at first, obama went over the top of public opinion to avenge american honor against isis. slowly, america<u+2019>s mission has crept to include some form of regime change with the ouster of assad. now clinton is selling the american people on greater military interventions so that the u.s. can challenge putin. clinton seems unable to distinguish between what is of vital interest to the russians and peripheral interest to america. she combines this with her bias toward always taking action <u+2014> of any sort, for good or ill. the combination is dangerous.<u+201d> 




the article ends in the hope that clinton is once again lying. both current president obama and hillary clinton are trying to sell america on the idea that there are moderates fighting a civil war in syria. we are arming and training them. are there moderates in syria worth supporting? do we have any business there to begin with? the article goes as far as stating the us is determined to overthrow every country that is friendly to russia. 




right now clinton wants to establish a no-fly-zone to protect her moderates. who are they? us special forces on the ground are adamant that clinton wants to give us military support to isis even if it means starting an open war with russia. 




<u+201c> nobody believes in it. you<u+2019>re like, <u+2018>fuck this,<u+2019><u+201d> a former green beret says of america<u+2019>s covert and clandestine programs to train and arm syrian militias. <u+201c>everyone on the ground knows they are jihadis. no one on the ground believes in this mission or this effort, and they know they are just training the next generation of jihadis, so they are sabotaging it by saying, <u+2018>fuck it, who cares?<u+2019><u+201d> <u+201c>i don<u+2019>t want to be responsible for nusra guys saying they were trained by americans,<u+201d> the green beret added. 




since 2014, ukraine has fully supported al nusra and at the beginning of the civil war pulled 200 isis fighters to the ukrainian front lines. these fighters are jihadis from crimea. they have also set up an isis training camp near mariupol. like all other volunteers, they don<u+2019>t receive government support and rob to make a living. 




before this, the kosovo example looms large. does inviting indicted mass murderers and people preparing for illegal organ trade (crimes against humanity) trials to your national party convention as special guests qualify as good judgment? does it showcase hillary clinton<u+2019>s good instincts to be president? 




welcome to the 2016 democratic national convention. hillary clinton<u+2019>s special guest from kosovo took time-out from preparing for his crimes against humanity case to give support and wish her well. 




<u+201c>invited as a guest to the 2016 democratic national convention is none other than kadri veseli, the speaker of the kosovo assembly. veseli is a former kosovar albanian leader of the kla and its spy organization shik. he<u+2019>s being indicted along with the current president of kosovo, hashim thaci for small things like organ trafficking and crimes against humanity .<u+2019> 




the main witness against clinton friends, veseli and thaci, is a man that was ordered to cut the heart out of another man that was begging for mercy. in a 1998 interview with the bbc , us special envoy to the balkans, robert gelbard had this to say about veseli and thaci; <u+201c>i know a terrorist when i see one and these men are terrorists.<u+201d> 




clinton<u+2019>s relationship with the albanian and kosovo killers stretches back to the first clinton election in 1992. during the campaign season the clinton duo found out quickly how powerful the emigre national vote was in america. in one fell swoop, the albanians and the kla after them went from what the usa definitely recognized as islamic terrorists to victims we were going to war for. 




the clinton humanitarian bombing in the balkans drove victims into the waiting clutches of the kla, and the spread of islamic terrorism worldwide. 




in what became her first executive decision, first lady, hillary clinton brow-beat the unwilling president clinton into bombing the balkans and creating a humanitarian catastrophe. today, as a result of this, isis is setting up training camps in what is widely referred to as clinton country. 




<u+201c>on the territory of kosovo and metohija, the local police detained three militants of so-called <u+201c>islamic state<u+201d> (a terrorist organization banned in russia), is going to organize a series of terrorist attacks in serbia.<u+201d> terrorists lih (igil/isis) break through the balkans to western europe march 2016 




clinton<u+2019>s jihadi bloc vote in america remains central to her winning this election along with the rest of the ceec. does america want people advising the president that openly support genocide like the kosovars, albanians, or ukrainians? 




hillary clinton is not an islamist. hillary clinton is not a nazi. but the question remains. why is she surrounded by and listening to people that are? is that her best judgment? 




the quasi-legal coup-hillary clinton information operations in election 2016 




<u+201c>the purpose of <u+201d> inform and influence operations<u+201d> is not to provide a perspective, opinion, or lay out a policy. it is defined as the ability to make audiences <u+201c>think and act<u+201d> in a manner favorable to the mission objectives. this is done through applying perception management techniques which target the audiences emotions, motives, and reasoning. 




these techniques are not geared for debate. it is to overwhelm and change the target psyche. 




using these techniques information sources can be manipulated and those that write, speak, or think counter to the objective are relegated as propaganda, ill-informed, or irrelevant.<u+201d> 




what if the strife, rumor, and clamor were part and parcel of an inform and influence operation against americans to determine the election outcome? bear with me for a moment as i lay out the proofs. the quote above is from an early 2015 article with the practitioner showing what it could look like in the civilian world. 




<u+201d> what would we do? disrupt, deny, degrade, deceive, corrupt, usurp or destroy the information. the information, please don<u+2019>t forget, is the ultimate objective of cyber. that will directly impact the decision-making process of the adversary<u+2019>s leader who is the ultimate target.<u+201d> <u+2013> joel harding 




io or iio (inform and influence operations) as defined by the us army includes the fields of psychological operations and military deception. all of this is used in the civilian world the same way by private contractors. 




in this election, private contractors were hired to focus their capacity to influence the american population. this is proven and you deserve a step by step look at it if you are voting. 




what project veritas shows is damning evidence of what i have been documenting in the emigre series articles since spring 2016. 




by using mainstream media, they started an integrated approach which includes influencing their political opponent<u+2019>s decision making. media is given messages that follow the same themes and fill the entire information space by using an across the board effort. the effort drowns out any other message. 




according to the observer, this has been happening throughout the election cycle to benefit hillary clinton. <u+201c> rather than informing voters to enrich democracy , the mainstream media has developed a feedback loop between support for particular candidates and the political agenda they intend to support. the freedom of the press is necessary for a democracy to function.<u+201d> the article further points out that it was the media that helped rig the primaries against bernie sanders. 




wikileaks has clearly shown the interplay between mainstream media and the clinton campaign. and they have shown clearly that most of the mainstream media are working to influence the election . this goes beyond partisan electioneering. all of this follows the exact pattern, a well planned information operation against the american public . 




as secretary of state, hillary clinton was also the ex-officio board member of the bbg . the bbg (broadcasting board of governors) run rfe/rl (radio free europe/ radio liberty). most of the 8-member board, appointed by the president of the united states, are the who<u+2019>s who of powerful media moguls in film, news, print, and radio. appointment to the bbg is like being awarded an ambassador position for the media industry. it<u+2019>s also why big media carries the same line or themes. 




the 7th member of the board of directors which runs rfe/rl is mathew armstrong . he is a longtime friend and mentor to retired brigadier general joel harding. he provides harding a lot of access and influence in media. armstrong<u+2019>s background is public relations. he is an expert in io and iio operations. his bio: author, lecturer, and strategist on public diplomacy and international media . he has worked on traditional and emerging security issues with both civilian and military government agencies, news organizations, think tanks, and academia across several continents. 




in what appears to be a conflict of interest, at least two bbg board members are working actively for the hillary clinton presidential campaign. 




karen kornbluh is helping refine and to get hillary clinton<u+2019>s message out. <u+201d> all of them are names to watch if clinton wins <u+2014> and key jobs at the fcc and other federal agencies are up for grabs.<u+201d> 




according to her bio : karen founded the new america foundation<u+2019>s work and family program and is a senior fellow for digital policy at the council on foreign relations. karen has written extensively about technology policy, women, and family policy for the atlantic , the new york times and the washington post . new york times columnist david brooks cited her democracy article <u+201c>families valued,<u+201d> focused on <u+201c>juggler families<u+201d> as one of the best magazine articles of 2006. 




michael kempner is the founder, president and chief executive officer of mww group, a staunch hillary clinton supporter, and may get a greater role if she is elected . kempner is a member of the public relations hall of fame. michael kempner hired anthony weiner after the sexting scandal broke in 2011. 




jeff shell, chairman of the bbg and universal filmed entertainment is supporting a secondary role by being an honor roll donor to the atlantic council . while the bbg is supposed to be neutral it has continuously helped increase tensions in eastern europe. while giving to the atlantic council may not be illegal while in his position, currently, the atlantic council<u+2019>s main effort is to ignite a war with russia. this may set up a major conflict of interest. 




according to journalist robert parry <u+201c>the people that will be taking senior positions and especially in foreign policy believe <u+201c>this consensus is driven by a broad-based backlash against a president who has repeatedly stressed the dangers of overreach and the need for restraint, especially in the middle east.<u+201d> 




parry goes on to say that at the forefront of this is the atlantic council, a think tank associated with nato. their main goal is a major confrontation with nuclear-armed russia. 




the atlantic council is the think tank for the ceec (central and eastern european coalition) which is associated with nato. the ceec has only one goal. the question to candidates that mattered is <u+201c>are you willing to go to war with russia?<u+201d> hillary clinton has received their unqualified support throughout the campaign. 




the central and eastern european coalition represent the various central and eastern european countries to the us government. what makes them special in an election is that they control a 20 million person strong bloc vote in key states across the country and sway elections by themselves. the price of a clinton win is war with russia. 




while the rest of the bbg board support clinton<u+2019>s proposed policy of closing syrian airspace, the ceec wants it because it will mean direct conflict with russia. hillary clinton<u+2019>s first foray into islamic politics led to genocide and made the way for isis setting up training camps in kosovo. hillary clinton has been friendly with jihadists for as long as she has had a national political career. according to us special forces on the ground in syria training the moderates, there are no moderates to train . 




green berets are forced to train jihadis that they know will eventually attack us. support our troops? give them good, honorable missions. they deserve better, don<u+2019>t they? 




as you go through the above links, the information is staggering. shown are large groups of people strategically located in swing states that will do anything to get her elected. the question is why? 




politically, we have a two party system. if you say you are republican, people have at least a general idea of what you mean. for democrats, it<u+2019>s no different. there are different kinds of politics that fit easily under each umbrella. but the point is they are recognizable and we know where they stand on issues. 




tell me, what are ounb beliefs? ounb is a political party and set of beliefs just like republican or democrat. the reason i am asking is that you can<u+2019>t tell me. the odds are you haven<u+2019>t heard about it before. when the atlantic council or the project for the new american century takes all the senior positions in the clinton white house, it will be filled with ounb and similar political partisans for the first time without dissenting voices. 




<u+201c>unity to act when required has been the diaspora<u+2019>s mantra <u+2013> this cannot be disputed . 




as time moves on, we see that things take a natural course. we see that two wings of the oun <u+2013> (ounb)banderivtsi and (ounm)melnykivtsi <u+2013> are working actively on the international level, working in partnership and currently are in strong negotiations about becoming a single entity again.<u+201d> 




the ounb political party started under stepan bandera and their political beliefs are quite literally nazi. in the 1930<u+2019>s they swore undying loyalty to adolf hitler and the diaspora was directing waffen ss battalions from america secretly even as other ukrainian emigres were fighting them. the ucca is the head of ounb thought in america and now they want america to celebrate their totalitarian beliefs with them. if you disagree with totalitarian politics, you are the enemy. after a brief description of what kind of beliefs the people have from the atlantic council that are taking up cabinet positions, the proof it is happening now follows. 




the ounb were the ss that manned the concentration camps during the holocaust. they successfully murdered 3 million war prisoners by starving them to death. the ounb killed over 250,000 jews, 500,000 ukrainians, and committed the first holocaust at babi yar. today the ucca is funding and running the volunteer battalions raping and killing in donbass the same way. 




they and the other emigre group leaders are also behind buying the media headlines and reach, damage control, and the information operation against americans today. if you want to know what american politics will look like within a few years, look at ukraine. 




there are people who live abroad, who do not feel fully accepted as a minority, and here there is a phenomenon which i call long-distance nationalism. . .the members of the diaspora create for themselves an image of the home land, which is a stronger emotional investment than the country in which they live<u+2026>one negative consequence of the diaspora experience is the emergence of what ander-son calls non-responsible politics: diaspora participation in the politics in the country with which they identify can often be toxic, and their impact can be felt through the funding of particular political figures, nationalist propaganda, and even weapons<u+2026>-multiculturalism, memory, and ritualization: ukrainian nationalist monuments in edmonton, alberta- pers anders rudling 




with the field day the emigres and paid media had with donald trump over david duke, they forgot to tell you that ukrainian emigres supporting hillary clinton hired duke in ukraine as a professor of history and sent their american kids to learn there. almost all ukrainian politicians have been through this fascist education system known as maup . the ukrainian american and other likeminded ethnics are the people that will fill the senior foreign and domestic cabinet positions. 




<u+201c> ounb leader ivan kobasa also took responsibility of making sure the ukrainian-americans received the proper secondary education at ukrainian nationalist schools(maup) in ukraine. from the mid-2000<u+2019>s enrollment in this educational system has skyrocketed into the hundreds of thousands. today almost all members of the current ukrainian government are graduates of this ideological system that was taught to them by moderates like david duke who is also a graduate of the maup system.<u+201d> 




<u+201c>i do care about social and economic issues affecting every american, but given the war in ukraine, there is only one issue that we as ukrainian americans must focus on: ukraine . 




the ukrainian issue <u+201c>trumps<u+201d> all other personal issues! 




a vote for trump is a vote against ukraine! 




when it comes to u.s. elections, ukrainian americans are a statistically minor, divided, unorganized voting group. the central and east european coalition is a coalition of u.s.-based organizations that represent their countries of heritage, a voting group of over 20 million people. the ukrainian congress committee of america and the ukrainian national association are member organizations of the ceec. americans of east and central european heritage can make a significant difference and influence the election result if their attention is focused.<u+201d> ukraine weekly the presidential election: can we make a difference 




hillary clinton<u+2019>s response is she will defend ukraine<u+2019>s borders! even though it has no eastern or northern border to defend. she has guaranteed to start a war with russia if she is elected. 




not only is clinton buying the media through these second parties, but they are hiring professional, former military psyops professionals to deny pertinent information from voters and disrupt her political opponents message. at the same time, they are paying an across the board mainstream media to simultaneously publish articles and video that lift her campaign up, disrupt, destroy, and drown out alternate messages. 




wikileaks noted this when it exposed the clinton campaign<u+2019>s program to incite violence and obfuscate the point. the huffington post example of this is<u+201d> editor<u+2019>s note: donald trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar , rampant xenophobe , racist , misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all muslims <u+2014> 1.6 billion members of an entire religion <u+2014> from entering the u.s<u+201d>. 




<u+201c> we understand the clinton camp has hired beaucoup and zwanzig (a lot) of trolls, we also understand the kremlin has done the same. we just do not know if trump has followed suit. from a counterintelligence perspective, this is confusing as heck. 




one of the really neat things about this election is seeing all my information operations and information warfare friends on social media, contributing and commenting, looking darned intelligent! theirs is normally the voice of reason, maturity, and intelligence.<u+201d> joel harding 




by systematically and continually attacking the voter<u+2019>s psyche, americans are being treated in the same way our government treats countries they overthrow . the right to make an informed vote has been denied to support any particular candidate. 




what does an inform and influence operation entail against the american public? read the following carefully. the term <u+201c>anti-western<u+201d> refers to anyone that disagrees with whom he is working for. in this case, he works for the ukrainian emigres. this also covers syria. every media outlet or journalist writing about these subjects that aren<u+2019>t carrying the line he lays out is the enemy. these are the tactics being used today during the election. 




<u+201c>i am building a database of planners , operators, logisticians, hackers, and anyone wanting to be involved with special activities i will call <u+2018>inform and influence activities<u+2019>. i have received a few different suggestions to help organize operations <u+2013> of all sorts <u+2013> against anti-western elements. no government approval, assistance or funding. this skirts legalities. this is not explicitly illegal and it may not even be legal, at this point. that grey area extends a long way. i am only trying to assess the availability of people willing to participate in such efforts. technology, equipment and facility offers are also appreciated. if you would like to be included in my database, please send a tailored resume to joel_harding@<u+201d> 




if you don<u+2019>t think this is possible , this has been going on around you for a long time. look at the credentials of retired brigadier general joel harding and decide for yourself. but first look at what he promises he can do for you when you hire him. 




<u+201c> information operations and warfare, also known as influence operations, includes the collection of tactical, operational and strategic information about a competitor as well as the dissemination of information and propaganda in pursuit of a competitive advantage over an competitor or adversary in the corporate, government or military realm. 




it is our job to maximize your advantages over your competitor while minimizing your competitor. we work on the national level down to the individual level. we seek to give you every advantage possible in order to advance your position, increase your reputation, and maximize your standing in your field.<u+201d> 




<u+201c> bio- joel harding spent 26 years in the army ; his first nine years were spent as an enlisted soldier, mostly in special forces, as an sf qualified communicator and medic, on an a-team. after completing his degree, joel then received his commission as an infantry officer and after four years transitioned to the military intelligence corps. 




in the mid 1990s, joel was working in the joint staff j2 in support of special operations, where he began working in the new field called information operations. eligible receiver 1997 was his trial by fire, after that he became the joint staff j2 liaison for io to the cia, dia, nsa, disa and other assorted agencies in the washington dc area, working as the intelligence lead on the joint staff io response cell for solar sunrise and moonlight maze. joel followed this by a tour at soccent and then inscom, working in both io and intelligence. 




specializing in russian information warfare for the past 30+ months. consultant, advisor and subject matter expert on information operations, strategic communication and public diplomacy with more than 19 years practical, policy in io, sc and pd. 35 years experience in broader defense and national security matters. i have lectured all over the world about information warfare and cyberwar and have spoken at numerous conferences. i am currently focusing on the ukraine/russia information war with a simultaneous heavy emphasis on the accompanying hybrid war. i currently teach classes about russian information warfare and a second class on propaganda/agitprop. specialties: information operations/information warfare, public diplomacy, strategic communication, counter-disinformation, electronic warfare, deception, operational security, cyberwar, intelligence, special forces and special operations. primary author ukraine national strategy for information policy, submitted in 2015 and again in 2016.<u+201d> 




with his resume, no guess work is needed to understand how effective his friends are. before going further, ask yourself if this is what elections are supposed to be? 




as a litmus test take hillary<u+2019>s name out and put down what is known just through wikileaks in a list. put mccain<u+2019>s name, kucinich, paul, bush, and ask yourself would this be an acceptable candidate? add what<u+2019>s been shown here. is there an acceptable candidate? 




if any of them would be acceptable, sorry like many others you drank the kool-aid already. 




<u+201c> i<u+2019>ve seen how our heroes, activists , journalists, and celebrities have completely sold their souls to support something no person with an iota of morality would do. i<u+2019>ve seen them say and do things to derail candidates who would have been a million times better for those less fortunate around us. it<u+2019>s unfortunate most pretend to fight the establishment, to act like they love the people more than they love the struggle and the relevance that it brings them. i am not one of those and i won<u+2019>t continue to be until the good lord takes me.<u+201d> cesar vargas 




hillary clinton is not a nazi. but every position of relevance will be filled with people that really are political nazis. they are technically integral nationalists. they look down on democracy in any form. at least now you know what kind of government you are voting for. 




regardless of who wins, there are 2000 tanks, artillery, and rockets pointed my way, waiting for this election to be over. i am an american that lives in donbass, and wrote many of the early breaking stories and much of the background about the conflict in ukraine. 




if you cannot objectively look and see a more sophisticated version of what happened here through 2014 is going on, i can<u+2019>t help you. soon the ounb will order the volunteer battalions to start killing civilians on a large scale again. i will go back to reporting on the war. 




if all these things weren<u+2019>t being done, i would keep it simply about policy. russia is not an enemy of the united states. instead, i believe i am witnessing a quiet coup that demands legality in america. 




if this information operation is allowed to win the 2016 presidency, then elections are fruitless. every other election will be based on the same strategy. they will have to be for any candidate to win. 




your voice, your views, your informed choice will no longer matter. the iio practitioner kills dissent. that<u+2019>s their job. they<u+2019>re only doing their job. 




the essential saker: from the trenches of the emerging multipolar world $27.95
why hillary clinton will appoint old world nationalists to cabinet positions and the quasi-legal coup-hillary clinton information operations in election 2016 | the vineyard of the saker
the saker