print 




[ed. <u+2013> how do they go through all this hair-tearing, the sackcloth and ashes, and not question the quality of their candidate <u+2014> or their choice to run her?] 




[clinton<u+2019>s allies] said they were <u+201c>dumbfounded<u+201d> by the revelation that the new fbi review may have been spurred by a separate investigation into anthony weiner sending lewd texts to a minor. weiner is separated from wife huma abedin, one of clinton<u+2019>s closest aides. 




and they worried that clinton<u+2019>s unconventional email arrangement had finally caught up to her and might imperil her presidential bid less than two weeks before election day. 




<u+201c>i<u+2019>m livid, actually,<u+201d> one clinton surrogate told the hill. <u+201c>this has turned into malpractice. it<u+2019>s an unforced error at this point. i have no idea what comey is up to but the idea this email issue is popping back up again is outrageous. it never should have occurred in the first place. someone somewhere should have told her no. and they didn<u+2019>t and now we<u+2019>re all paying the price.<u+201d> 




another ally called the campaign<u+2019>s mood something akin to <u+201c>paralysis,<u+201d> and blamed weiner<u+2019>s behavior for railroading the campaign. 




one strategist said the developments would further cement the notion that clinton has something to hide. 




<u+201c>it<u+2019>s made people think there<u+2019>s always going to be something around the clintons, some investigation, some inquiry,<u+201d> the strategist said. <u+201c>it never goes away.<u+201d>
angry dems get blame-y as fbi probe resumes <u+2013> but not against hillary
j.e. dyer