posted on november 6, 2016 by eric zuesse. eric zuesse at 2:47 in this video about a key moment in the 7 september 2016 <u+201c>town hall<u+201d> <u+2018>debate<u+2019> between trump and clinton where matt lauer has asked her about her privatization of her state department emails, ms. clinton says, <u+201c>but the real question is the handling of classified materials, which is i think what the implication of your question was.<u+201d> lauer did not deny that; he was following the line of comey, that only the classified emails could pose a criminal problem for her. however, that assumption is flat-out false, and both hillary clinton knows it (which is why she tried there to narrow the meaning of his question to the classified-information issue ), and also comey knows it (which is why he has his fbi exclude from its consideration the illegality of her privatization of official email itself <u+2014> her theft of u.s. government information, her abuse of even non-confidential information, her destruction of evidence by destroying her government emails, etcetera <u+2014> there are several laws she broke which have nothing to do with <u+201c>confidential information,<u+201d> but both the fbi and the <u+2018>news<u+2019> media (at least until comey<u+2019>s about-face on october 28th) were ignoring them, and they still do ignore each one of them. here are six of those laws . they describe what nobody denies that she did, and the maximum sentence under all of them, if the fbi were to <u+201c>throw the book at her,<u+201d> would be 72 years. conviction of her under them would be a slam-dunk, but all of these laws are being simply ignored. so, the questions here are: why is the fbi ignoring those criminal laws, which she clearly did violate? why are america<u+2019>s <u+2018>news<u+2019> media ignoring the fbi<u+2019>s ignoring these laws?
shocking questions about the fbi & the <u+2018>news<u+2019> media
eric zuesse.