print 




will the 2016 election be rigged? 




that depends on what the definition of <u+201c>is<u+201d> is <u+2013> and whether or not you count blatant media bias, operatives and instigators, shady quasi-voters, bizarre electronic voting <u+201c>errors<u+201d> and a heavy-handed advantage in the electoral college and the shifting demographics of a socialist state that promises much to certain groups. 




with the gop leadership turning its back on trump, and the democratic machine dedicated solely to providing for her, it will be a difficult win for trump, despite overwhelming enthusiasm at rallies across the entire country and lop-sided pro-trump crowds that literally dwarf pro-hillary gatherings of very few. 




but as most everyone knows by now, it isn<u+2019>t the popular vote that counts <u+2013> but only the delegates awarded state-by-state to the electoral college<u+2026> and that is a game that hillary<u+2019>s operatives are very good at playing. daily news brief: the 2016 election is in the process of being stolen with rigged voting machines 




there are several states <u+2013> in particular <u+2013> that are being surprisingly maneuvered for her advantage<u+2026> and if successful, will block trump from even coming close the presidency. texas could turn <u+201c>blue<u+201d> for the first time in 20 years 




this is the big enchilada, so to speak. for the first time in many decades, texas is in play for hillary and the democrats. texas has been as solidly <u+201c>red<u+201d> as any state in the union, but 2016 could be different. 




with 38 electoral votes, the lone star state is the biggest prize on the map next to california, whose 55 electoral votes have gone to the democrats since before history began. since at least 2008, the dems have been massaging their electioneering strategy to capitalize on shifting demographics <u+2013> with plenty of hispanics in the next generation of voters. on paper, hillary should be able to play well to hispanics with all the controversy over trump<u+2019>s immigration stances and talk of a border wall. rumors of illegal immigrants be encouraged to vote could be a crucial factor, with polls in texas close to neck and neck<u+2026> it could go either way. 




of course, there is every reason to think that team hillary is not taking any chances. 




as michael snyder and many others have reported , electronic voting machines have been mysteriously flipping votes for hillary in several counties in texas<u+2026> and that doesn<u+2019>t bode well for a massive electoral prize that is within range for her campaign: 




early voting has already begun in many states, and a number of voters in texas are reporting that the voting machines switched their votes from donald trump to hillary clinton. the odd thing is that none of the other choices were affected when these individuals attempted to vote for a straight republican ticket. if hillary clinton is declared the winner of the state of texas on election night, a full investigation of these voting machines should be conducted, because there is no way that donald trump should lose that state. i have said that it will be the greatest miracle in u.s. political history if donald trump wins this election, but without the state of texas donald trump has exactly zero chance of winning. 




at least one county is making an emergency switch to paper ballots after irregularities were found with the electronic machines during early voting. 




meanwhile, infowars confronted the head of texas<u+2019> elections about his decision to violate voter laws and abandon a manual count of a random sampling of 1-3% of votes (which should theoretically reflect the larger voting trend, unless something is fishy). without that count, there is less accountability than ever: 




this is major issue, and texas isn<u+2019>t the only state<u+2026> just the biggest. 




2. utah<u+2019>s independent republican could actually beat trump 




ok, so utah only has a grand total of 6 electoral college votes<u+2026> and has never been a decisive swing state in a presidential election. but that is because the state has been so solidly <u+201c>red.<u+201d> however, this election is totally different. 




a little known independent candidate named evan mcmullin has actually taken the lead in several recent polls in utah, and is neck-and-neck with both trump and hillary in several other polls (at or around 30% apiece). libertarian gary johnson is also playing (relatively) well at about 5% <u+2013> possibly enough to swing further momentum away form trump. 




but evan mcmullin is the real surprise hit <u+2013> in a state that is suddenly considered an important battleground in the election. 




mcmullin is a mormon, which gives him a significant boost. he is officially tied to better for america, which is basically a #nevertrump operation <u+2013> backed by neocons like william kristol. perhaps unsurprisingly, evan mcmullin has a pretty colorful and telling background : on top of being a former policy director for house republicans, he<u+2019>s also a former cia operations officer; a member of the elite think tank council on foreign relations (cfr); a former goldman sachs investment banker and a volunteer refugee resettlement officer for the united nations high commissioner for refugees in jordan. 




wow! i wonder if there could be an agenda there. hillary probably won<u+2019>t win utah, but trump may not either <u+2013> and it could make a crucial difference if he is within striking distance of 270 electoral votes. 




3. florida is a must win swing state for trump<u+2026> but current polls show possible hillary win 




oh boy<u+2026> florida all over again. with 29 electoral votes, it remains a major contender that is so often on the fence and swinging in the wind. it is considered essential for a trump victory, and indeed for just about any successful republican bid for the presidency. 




sure, we all know the polls are rigged, and may be oversampling dems to look better for hillary on paper <u+2013> but nonetheless, that perception drives expectations. 




if she can create a convincing win there, it could change the course of the election once again. florida has consistently been the closest outcome <u+2013> in 2008 and 2012 it went blue for obama; in 2000 and 2004 it went red for bush (and not without major controversy and some very shady recounting). 




her team is pushing heavily for early voting in florida, and so far they claim an early voting advantage. 




but campaign surrogate roger stone is now reporting that hillary has met secretly with broward county officials in florida, and there is speculation that problems with the voting machines may soon be happening all over again. 




pay very close to what happens there, because of course, florida could be the deciding state (again). right now polls are within 2 points , currently in favor of trump by a very narrow margin. 




4. colorado has known voting fraud issues <u+2013> with dead people on the voter rolls 




with 9 electoral votes, colorado is currently swinging <u+201c>blue<u+201d> but could go either way. cbs4 and the washington times reported that an investigation was started by colorado<u+2019>s secretary of state after multiple examples were found of deceased people registered and in the voter rolls: 




<u+201c>this is the kind of thing you hear rumored, joked about in chicago, that kind of thing,<u+201d> mr. maasssaid during a thursday evening broadcast. <u+201c>tonight, that changes. we did find voter fraud in colorado that essentially waters down your vote.<u+201d> 




[<u+2026>] 




<u+201c>this is the kind of thing you hear rumored, joked about in chicago, that kind of thing,<u+201d> mr. maasssaid during a thursday evening broadcast. <u+201c>tonight, that changes. we did find voter fraud in colorado that essentially waters down your vote.<u+201d> 




it<u+2019>s not clear whether or not colorado could make a difference in the outcome, but the results could prove suspect. 




5. hillary is <u+201c>leading<u+201d> in these key swing states 




while trump is expected to win the crucial state of ohio, and also north carolina, hillary is projected to take key states including pennsylvania, colorado, iowa, virginia and arizona. 




according to the washington post : 




if clinton can hold virginia, pennsylvania, and colorado, then she only needs one more out of many swing states <u+2014> new hampshire, nevada, ohio, iowa, north carolina, or florida <u+2014> barring any surprise trump win in a blue-leaning state like wisconsin. that is currently looking very plausible. 




while any of these could change in the actual outcome, it shows that hillary has definitely maneuvered to win where it counts <u+2013> not with the people, but with the electoral college. 




the details are too numerous to follow here, and anything could happen. 




6. you know voter fraud is happening if the media claim it isn<u+2019>t 




what should be very telling to everyone is how loudly the major media <u+2013> in concert <u+2013> are trying to debunk trump<u+2019>s claims of voter fraud and insist that all is well when it is quite clear that there are major issues. 




this is one claim that the system is very afraid of, because quite frankly, they have a great deal to hide. 




there is more reason than ever for accountability, reporting on any irregularities and an insistence that the will of the people be respected <u+2013> because the system is desperate to hold onto control at any cost. 




article reposted with permission from shtf plan shares
<u+201c>rigged to deny trump<u+201d>: are they stealing these states to block electoral path to 270?
mac slavo