tenured , of course. 




he calls the bundy verdicts <u+201c>nullification<u+201d><u+2014> which they ain<u+2019>t, since the jury did its job based on the facts. 




by the way, nullification is fine when called for. in the nineteenth century, the jury<u+2019>s common, and not the judge<u+2019>s instructions, guided the verdict. 




then he claims that armed americans should <u+201c>scare all americans.<u+201d> 




again, translated: <u+201c>those who refuse to do what the government tells them are a danger to the country!<u+201d> 




and, laughably, this statist winds it up by pretending he supports <u+201c>law and order<u+201d>! 




and the good news? he really is mad. and that<u+2019>s good. better than having him gloat over a cowed jury<u+2019>s guilty verdict.
one mad, lyin<u+2019> leftist
christopher manion