abby martin exposes what hillary clinton really represents <u+2039> <u+203a> since 2011, vnn has operated as part of the veterans today network ; a group that operates over 50 plus media, information and service online sites for u.s. military veterans. woodward on clinton foundation <u+201c>it<u+2019>s corrupt<u+201d> by vnn on october 28, 2016 he<u+2019>s correct: the clinton foundation is corrupt, and voters should be troubled by clinton<u+2019>s role in the unethical pay-for-play scandals. 




conservative tribune 




voters have been concerned about democrat presidential nominee hillary clinton<u+2019>s involvement in the scandal-ridden clinton foundation. 




liberal journalist bob woodward legitimized those concerns sunday on fox news by pointing to the foundation<u+2019>s <u+201c> pay-for-play <u+201d> scandals while clinton served as secretary of state as something that should trouble voters. 




woodward, who broke the watergate story that led to the downfall of president richard nixon, told host chris wallace in no uncertain terms that the clinton foundation is <u+201c>corrupt<u+201d> and a <u+201c>scandal.<u+201d> 




watch woodward<u+2019>s comments on fox news sunday here: 




<u+201c>there are allegations about the clinton foundation and pay-for-play,<u+201d> wallace said. <u+201c>when you see what seems to be clear evidence that clinton foundation donors were being treated differently than non-donors in terms of access, when you see this new revelations (sic) about the $12 million deal between hillary clinton, the foundation and the king of morocco, are voters right to be troubled by this?<u+201d> 




<u+201c>yes,<u+201d> woodward responded. <u+201c> it<u+2019>s corrupt . it<u+2019>s a scandal.<u+201d> 




wallace had attempted to get answers from clinton about the issue at the final presidential debate with republican candidate donald trump. 




but of course clinton ducked the moderator<u+2019>s question and instead talked about the organization<u+2019>s charitable donations rather than its extreme conflicts of interest <u+2014> something woodward took note of and criticized her for. 




<u+201c>she didn<u+2019>t answer your question at all,<u+201d> woodward told wallace. <u+201c>and she turned to embrace the good work that the clinton foundation has done.<u+201d> 




woodward apparently didn<u+2019>t want to discredit the <u+201c>good work<u+201d> done by the organization, but pointed out that even its <u+201c>good work<u+201d> is compromised by the overwhelming evidence of corruption. 




<u+201c>(t)he mixing of speech fees, the clinton foundation and actions by the state department <u+2014> which she ran <u+2014> are all intertwined and it<u+2019>s corrupt,<u+201d> he argued. 




he<u+2019>s correct: the clinton foundation is corrupt, and voters should be troubled by clinton<u+2019>s role in the unethical pay-for-play scandals. 




unfortunately clinton has an acute ability to avoid being held accountable for her scandals, but we have faith in the american people and their desire to be led by a person with integrity and respect for the office he holds, not someone who continuously looks for ways for his political power to benefit his personal life. 




like and share on facebook and twitter if you agree with bob woodward about hillary clinton and her family<u+2019>s scandal-ridden clinton foundation. what do you think about woodward<u+2019>s criticism of clinton? scroll down to comment below!
woodward on clinton foundation <u+201c>it<u+2019>s corrupt<u+201d>
my catbird seat