written by peter van buren   venerable new york times ran a story saying donald trump lies about the height of his buildings.for no apparent reason, the times resurrected some information from 1979 saying trump insisted on counting the basement levels of his signature trump tower in the overall count of how many floors the building has. the times compares this lie to <u+201c>reports<u+201d> that trump adds an inch to his actual body height in his bio materials, and also repeated the gag line that he boasted about how long his penis is (no word on whether it is or is not actually longer than expected.)you have to wade down to paragraph 12 to learn other new york developers use the same count-the-basements levels gimmick to be able to advertise their buildings as taller. there is absolutely no news. the russians head over to slate , which published an <u+201c>investigative piece<u+201d> alleging a trump computer server was secretly communicating with a russian bank. the story had previously been debunked by the new york times and the intercept, but slate ran it as if they had uncovered the smoking gun proving trump is under the control of the russians.at mother jones , another article alleged that an anonymous, former intelligence officer provided the fbi with information on a russian scheme to help trump win the presidency.<u+201c>there<u+2019>s no way to tell whether the fbi has confirmed or debunked any of the allegations contained in the former spy<u+2019>s memos,<u+201d> the story said. <u+201c>but a russian intelligence attempt to co-opt or cultivate a presidential candidate would mark an even more serious operation than the hacking.<u+201d>one more example, from vox , which wrote without even bothering to source it at all <u+201c>there is basically conclusive evidence that russia is interfering in the us election, and that this interference has been designed to damage hillary clinton<u+2019>s campaign. there is strong evidence linking trump<u+2019>s foreign policy advisers to russia, and trump<u+2019>s stated policy ideas are extremely favorable to russian interests.<u+201d> journalism much? i<u+2019>ve chosen these examples because they are from publications that have in the past enjoyed decent reputations for reporting, and because these stories were run as <u+201c>news,<u+201d> not opinion columns, where the standards go right through the floor. even mother jones, which clearly works left-of-center, used to do so with some solid journalism.not any more.these places (never find fringe publications) are now working with the same standards once reserved for reporting on aliens at roswell, elvis sightings and the illuminati new world order. it is apparently now within the bounds of mainstream journalism to build a story out of, well, nothing, such as a factoid from 1979, or essentially accuse a presidential candidate of treason based on a single, anonymous source, or claim the russians have taken over our electoral process based on no sources at all. and clinton<u+2026> on the other side, reporting on clinton by many of these same publications swerves between hagiography and poo-pooing away anything unfavorable. emails? who cares! questions about what her accomplishments as secretary of state really were? if you ask, you hate women. pay-for-play with the clinton foundation? hah, everybody does it, it doesn<u+2019>t matter. the standard seems to be absent a notarized receipt for a donation matching an arms sale, or a criminal conviction, nothing matters. next? so be it. the media has fully sh*t the bed this election. that<u+2019>s where we find ourselves.but what<u+2019>s next? will the media reset itself after november 8, or will they run president trump is putin<u+2019>s dog stories for the full term? will president clinton be given a pass on, well, everything, for four years, with apologists and explainers on the front page of the times, never mind in editorials?at what point will the media dig themselves out of this and start real reporting again? reprinted with permission from wemeantwell.com . related
will the media reset after the election or are we stuck with this tabloid stuff?
peter van buren