the de facto us/al qaeda alliance




exclusive: buried deep inside saturday<u+0092>s new york times was a grudging acknowledgement that the u.s.-armed <u+0093>moderate<u+0094> rebels in syria are using their u.s. firepower to back an al qaeda offensive, reports robert parry.




by robert parry october 31, 2016 " information clearing house " - a curious aspect of the syrian conflict <u+0096> a rebellion sponsored largely by the united states and its gulf state allies <u+0096> is the disappearance in much of the american mainstream news media of references to the prominent role played by al qaeda in seeking to overthrow the secular syrian government of bashar al-assad.




there<u+0092>s much said in the u.s. press about isis, the former <u+0093>al qaeda in iraq<u+0094> which splintered off several years ago, but al qaeda<u+0092>s central role in commanding syria<u+0092>s <u+0093>moderate<u+0094> rebels in aleppo and elsewhere is the almost unspoken reality of the syrian war. even in the u.s. presidential debates, the arguing between republican donald trump and democrat hillary clinton has been almost exclusively about isis, not al qaeda.




though al qaeda got the ball rolling on america<u+0092>s revenge wars in the middle east 15 years ago by killing several thousand americans and others in the 9/11 attacks, the terrorist group has faded into the background of u.s. attention, most likely because it messes up the preferred <u+0093>good guy/bad guy<u+0094> narrative regarding the syrian war.




for instance, the conflict in aleppo between syrian government forces and rebels operating primarily under al qaeda<u+0092>s command is treated in the western media as simply a case of the barbaric assad and his evil russian ally vladimir putin mercilessly bombing what is portrayed as the east aleppo equivalent of disney world, a place where innocent children and their families peacefully congregate until they are targeted for death by the assad-putin war-crime family.




the photos sent out to the world by skillful rebel propagandists are almost always of wounded children being cared for by the <u+0093>white helmet<u+0094> rebel civil defense corps , which has come under growing criticism for serving as a public-relations arm of al qaeda and other insurgents. (there also are allegations that some of the most notable images have been staged , like a fake war scene from the 1997 dark comedy, <u+0093>wag the dog.<u+0094>)




rare glimpse of truth




yet, occasionally, the reality of al qaeda<u+0092>s importance in the rebellion breaks through, even in the mainstream u.s. media, although usually downplayed and deep inside the news pages, such as the a9 article in saturday<u+0092>s new york times by hwaida saad and anne barnard describing a rebel offensive in aleppo. it acknowledges: <u+0093>the new offensive was a strong sign that rebel groups vetted by the united states were continuing their tactical alliances with groups linked to al qaeda, rather than distancing themselves as russia has demanded and the americans have urged. the rebels argue that they cannot afford to shun any potential allies while they are under fire, including well-armed and motivated jihadists, without more robust aid from their international backers.<u+0094> (you might note how the article subtly blames the rebel dependence on al qaeda on the lack of <u+0093>robust aid<u+0094> from the obama administration and other outside countries <u+0096> even though such arms shipments violate international law.)




what the article also makes clear in a hazy kind of way is that al qaeda<u+0092>s affiliate, the recently renamed nusra front, and its jihadist allies, such as ahrar al-sham, are waging the brunt of the fighting while the cia-vetted <u+0093>moderates<u+0094> are serving in mostly support roles. the times reported:




<u+0093>the insurgents have a diverse range of objectives and backers, but they issued statements of unity on friday. those taking part in the offensive include the levant conquest front, a militant group formerly known as the nusra front that grew out of al qaeda; another hard-line islamist faction, ahrar al-sham; and other rebel factions fighting mr. assad that have been vetted by the united states and its allies.<u+0094>




the article cites charles lister, a senior fellow and syria specialist at the middle east institute in washington, and other analysts noting that <u+0093>the vast majority of the american-vetted rebel factions in aleppo were fighting inside the city itself and conducting significant bombardments against syrian government troops in support of the qaeda-affiliated fighters carrying out the brunt of front-line fighting.<u+0094>




lister noted that 11 of the 20 or so rebel groups conducting the aleppo <u+0093>offensive have been vetted by the c.i.a. and have received arms from the agency, including anti-tank missiles.




<u+0093>in addition to arms provided by the united states, much of the rebels<u+0092> weaponry comes from regional states, like turkey, qatar and saudi arabia, mr. lister said, including truck-borne multiple-rocket launcher systems and czech-made grad rockets with extended ranges.<u+0094>




the u.s./al qaeda alliance




in other words, the u.s. government and its allies have smuggled sophisticated weapons into syria to arm rebels who are operating in support of al qaeda<u+0092>s new military offensive against syrian government forces in aleppo. by any logical analysis, that makes the united states an ally of al qaeda.




the times article also includes a quote: from genevieve casagrande, a syria research analyst from the institute for the study of war, a neoconservative <u+0093>think tank<u+0094> that has supported more aggressive u.s. military involvement in syria and the middle east.




<u+0093>the unfortunate truth, however, is that these u.s.-backed groups remain somewhat dependent upon the al qaeda linked groups for organization and firepower in these operations,<u+0094> casagrande said.




the other unfortunate truth is that the u.s.-supplied rebels have served, either directly or indirectly, as conduits to funnel u.s. military equipment and ordnance to al qaeda.




one might think that the editors of the new york times <u+0096> if they were operating with old-fashioned news judgment rather than with propagandistic blinders on <u+0096> would have recast the article to highlight the tacit u.s. alliance with al qaeda and put that at the top of the front page.




still, the admissions are significant, confirming what we have reported at consortiumnews.com for many months, including gareth porter<u+0092>s article last february saying : <u+0093>information from a wide range of sources, including some of those the united states has been explicitly supporting, makes it clear that every armed anti-assad organization unit in those provinces [of idlib and aleppo] is engaged in a military structure controlled by [al qaeda<u+0092>s] nusra militants. all of these rebel groups fight alongside the nusra front and coordinate their military activities with it.




<u+0093>at least since 2014 the obama administration has armed a number of syrian rebel groups even though it knew the groups were coordinating closely with the nusra front, which was simultaneously getting arms from turkey and qatar.<u+0094>




double standards




the times article on page a9 also deviated from the normal propaganda themes by allowing a statement by syrian officials and the russians regarding their suspension of airstrikes over the past week to permit the evacuation of civilians from east aleppo and the rebels<u+0092> refusal to let people leave, even to the point of firing on the humanitarian corridors:




<u+0093>the [syrian] government and its [russian] allies accused the rebels of forcing aleppo residents to stay, and of using them as human shields.<u+0094>




the <u+0093>human shields<u+0094> argument is one that is common when the united states or its allies are pummeling some city controlled by <u+0093>enemy<u+0094> forces whether israel<u+0092>s bombardment of gaza or the u.s. marines<u+0092> leveling of fallujah in iraq or the current campaign against isis in the iraqi city of mosul. in those cases, the horrific civilian bloodshed, including the killing of children by u.s. or allied forces, is blamed on hamas or sunni insurgents or isis but never on the people dropping the bombs.




an entirely opposite narrative is applied when u.s. adversaries, such as syria or russia, are trying to drive terrorists and insurgents out of an urban area. then, there is usually no reference to <u+0093>human shields<u+0094> and all the carnage is blamed on <u+0093>war crimes<u+0094> by the u.s. adversaries. that propaganda imperative helps explain why al qaeda and its jihadist comrades have been largely whited out of the conflict in aleppo.




over the past few years, u.s. regional allies, such as israel and saudi arabia, also have shifted their public attitudes toward al qaeda, seeing it as a blunt instrument to smash the so-called <u+0093>shiite crescent<u+0094> reaching from iran through syria to lebanon. for instance, in september 2013, israel<u+0092>s ambassador to the united states michael oren, then a close adviser to israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu, told the jerusalem post that israel favored syria<u+0092>s sunni extremists over president assad.




<u+0093>the greatest danger to israel is by the strategic arc that extends from tehran, to damascus to beirut. and we saw the assad regime as the keystone in that arc,<u+0094> oren told the jerusalem post in an interview . <u+0093>we always wanted bashar assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys who weren<u+0092>t backed by iran to the bad guys who were backed by iran.<u+0094> he said this was the case even if the <u+0093>bad guys<u+0094> were with al qaeda.




and, in june 2014, speaking as a former ambassador at an aspen institute conference, oren expanded on his position, saying israel would even prefer a victory by the brutal islamic state over continuation of the iranian-backed assad in syria. <u+0093>from israel<u+0092>s perspective, if there<u+0092>s got to be an evil that<u+0092>s got to prevail, let the sunni evil prevail,<u+0094> oren said.




warming to al qaeda




as israeli officials shifted toward viewing al qaeda and even isis as the lesser evils and built a behind-the-scenes alliance with saudi arabia and the sunni states, american neoconservatives also began softening their tone regarding the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks.




across the u.s. foreign policy establishment, pressure built for <u+0093>regime change<u+0094> in damascus even if that risked handing syria to sunni jihadists. that strategy hit a road bump in 2014 when isis began chopping off the heads of western hostages in syria and capturing swathes of territory in iraq, including mosul.




that bloody development forced president barack obama to begin targeting isis militants in both iraq and syria, but the neocon-dominated washington establishment still favored the israeli-saudi objective of <u+0093>regime change<u+0094> in syria regardless of how that might help al qaeda.




thus, al qaeda<u+0092>s nusra front and its jihadist ally, ahrar al-sham, faded into the background under the fiction that the anti-assad forces were primarily noble <u+0093>moderates<u+0094> trying to save the children from the bloodthirsty fiends, assad and putin.




grudgingly, the new york times, deep inside saturday<u+0092>s newspaper, acknowledged at least part of the troubling reality, that the u.s. government has, in effect, allied itself with al qaeda terrorists.




investigative reporter robert parry broke many of the iran-contra stories for the associated press and newsweek in the 1980s. you can buy his latest book, america<u+0092>s stolen narrative, either in print here or as an e-book (from amazon and barnesandnoble.com ).
the de facto us/al qaeda alliance    : information
robert parry