if donald trump could make the case for donald trump half as well as mike pence makes the case for donald trump, the new york businessman would be well on his way to the white house. that<u+2019>s our conclusion from tuesday<u+2019>s vice presidential debate, in which the indiana governor made the sustained case against the hillary clinton-barack obama status quo in washington that mr. trump should have made last week. mr. pence is a former radio talk show host, and it showed with his cool, articulate delivery. his earnest, low-key demeanor was a notable contrast to tim kaine, whose strategy seemed to be to interrupt mr. pence at every opportunity. perhaps the virginia senator studied joe biden <u+2019>s strategy from four years ago when the vice president did the same against paul ryan, but mr. kaine is not a natural bully. our guess is that his endless interruptions grated on millions of viewers. mr. kaine<u+2019>s marching orders clearly were to absorb the clinton campaign<u+2019>s opposition research file on mr. trump, keep repeating it, and dare mr. pence to defend it. the point seemed to be to remind americans that mr. trump can be crude, nasty and untutored. this fits the clinton campaign strategy to delegitimize mr. trump personally as a potential president. his affirmative case for mrs. clinton and her agenda were almost afterthoughts. for the most part mr. pence dodged this trap, going back on offense against the clinton-obama record rather than defend every trump statement, many of which are indefensible. this is a useful lesson for mr. trump to take into the next debate on sunday night, a town hall in which audience members will ask the questions. people want to like their presidents. the most notable substantive exchanges occurred on foreign policy, with mr. pence offering a detailed critique of mr. obama<u+2019>s record and growing global disorder. mr. kaine kept saying that hillary clinton was part of the team that killed osama bin laden, but that is old antiterror news. mr. pence replied that the main terror threat now is islamic state, which he rightly said grew out of <u+201c>the vacuum<u+201d> left when president obama withdrew all u.s. troops from iraq. also notable was the debate on russia, with mr. kaine claiming that mr. trump has business ties with <u+201c>oligarchs<u+201d> that cause him to apologize for vladimir putin. mr. trump<u+2019>s admiration for mr. putin is mysterious and worrisome. but mr. pence pointed out that mrs. clinton<u+2019>s hawkishness-come-lately on russia follows years of weak policy that invited mr. putin<u+2019>s aggression. mr. pence reminded the audience what a classic republican security policy sounds like<u+2014>if only mr. trump would adopt it. vice presidential debates don<u+2019>t typically change the course of an election, but this one could be different if mr. trump heeds its lessons in his next debate. the republican has slid in the polls since the first debate by getting lost in dead-end issues and self-indulgent twitter bursts. if this is the trump who shows up on sunday, he will validate the kaine critique and the election will essentially be over. the alternative is to follow the pence template of doing your homework, sounding presidential, and making the case for change from the failures of the last seven years on the economy and security. if mr. trump wants to win, his running mate showed him the way.
trump<u+2019>s best debate - wsj
noauthor