tweet home <u+00bb> headlines <u+00bb> world news <u+00bb> <u+201c>executive orders for sale<u+201d>: leaked email shows hillary auctioning off <u+2018>laws<u+2019> to the highest bidder 




a new revelation buried in the wikileaks trove of emails shows discussion of executive orders in relation to an <u+201c>idea<u+201d> a wealthy donor has. corruption doesn<u+2019>t even begin to cover it if wealthy donors <u+2013> and even foreign powers <u+2013> can just write checks, contribute to the clinton foundation, etc. <u+2013> and just buy a law in return<u+2026> 









by melissa dykes, the daily sheeple via shtfplan : 




editor<u+2019>s comment: unaccountable power multiplies, but this is astounding. this is a very good example of the reasons that the founders sought to limit and check power. but of course, over the years, those protections have been whittled down, and the loopholes are big enough drive tanks through. corruption doesn<u+2019>t even begin to cover it if wealthy donors <u+2013> and even foreign powers <u+2013> can just write checks, contribute to the clinton foundation, etc. <u+2013> and just buy a law in return. 




why is no one standing up to this tyranny? critics have taken george w. bush and barack obama to task for abusing their power to write executive orders <u+2013> and legislate with a pen when they have no constitutional power to make law at all. but hillary, before she even takes power, is already leaving these two in the dust. so everyone is just going to take it, along with the <u+2018>first female<u+2019> t-shirts they will be sending out as promos in the mail? 




as mlk famously wrote from his birmingham jail cell: <u+201c>at first glance it may seem rather paradoxical for us consciously to break laws. one may well ask: <u+201c>how can you advocate breaking some laws and obeying others?<u+201d> the answer lies in the fact that there are two types of laws: just and unjust. i would be the first to advocate obeying just laws. one has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. i would agree with st. augustine that <u+201c>an unjust law is no law at all.<u+201d> 




executive orders for sale? leaked email shows hillary camp answering wealthy donor<u+2019>s questions about how executive orders work 




by melissa dykes 




if you already thought the executive order system falls somewhere between problematic and completely unconstitutional, this takes it to a whole new, never before seen level of corruption. 




thanks to all the leaks, america now knows our government is essentially one giant pay-for-play operation. that<u+2019>s how it works. that<u+2019>s how the dnc works. that<u+2019>s how the clinton foundation works. 




but how far does that go? 




how about bypassing congress entirely with money in the most literal sense possible. 




this leaked email chain hints at something that kind of makes votes and lobbyists and, well, all of it rather pointless. 




if someone<u+2019>s wealthy enough, can they straight up buy an executive order? 




these days, the president uses executive orders to bypass congress, even though there is no constitutional provision that explicitly permits the use of executive orders. it<u+2019>s a system that<u+2019>s been heavily abused in the past but now, apparently, it<u+2019>s for sale . 




a new revelation buried in the wikileaks trove of tens of thousands of hillary campaign chairman john podesta<u+2019>s emails shows him discussing executive orders in relation to an <u+201c>idea<u+201d> a wealthy donor has. 




in a leaked email thread between podesta and mary pat bonner, a <u+201c>donor adviser<u+201d> who gets millions for her elite connections in bringing in donors and for being what the new york times describes as a <u+201c>master of making donors happy,<u+201d> it<u+2019>s all but admitted that executive orders are another pay-for-play item on the corrupt american political menu. 




read this from the bottom up: 




(click to enlarge) 




in an email with the subject line, <u+201c>is there someone in your shop,<u+201d> bonner writes, <u+201c>who totally understands <u+2018>executive orders<u+2019>. it is to answer a very big donors questions.<u+201d> 




podesta responds with simply, <u+201c>me.<u+201d> 




bonner: <u+201c>it is for michael king.<u+201d> 




podesta: <u+201c>what does he need?<u+201d> 




bonner: <u+201c>he has an idea and just need answer [sic] to a bunch of easy questions about how this works.<u+201d> 




oh goody. mega wealthy donor michael king has an <u+201c>idea<u+201d> about executive orders<u+2026> 




the michael king they are likely referencing is rich tv mogul michael king, the exec who inherited king world productions later acquired by cbs. to give you an idea, king world productions launched harpo<u+2019>s the oprah winfrey show and dr. phil<u+2019>s talk show. 




back in 2012, bill clinton teamed up with king on a pricey fundraiser for president obama at king<u+2019>s pacific palisades estate where tickets ranged from general seating starting at $1,000 and went all the way up to $40,000 premium seats with meet-and-greets. 




while on the campaign trail over a year out from the election, hillary clinton has already vowed she will use executive orders to pass gun control regulations, for example. 




based on this email thread, you have to wonder what other eos hillary plans to pass as president<u+2026> and whose <u+201c>idea<u+201d> they are. 




and how much that idea cost. this entry was posted in world news . bookmark the permalink . post navigation
<u+201c>executive orders for sale<u+201d>: leaked email shows hillary auctioning off <u+2018>laws<u+2019> to the highest bidder
the doc