messures of constraint, a State enterprise was subject to the same rules and liabilities as a natural or juridical person. Logically, therefore, the Stale could nclt invoke immunity from measures of constraint before the court of the forum State in respect of such State property as the State had entrusted to a State enterprise. 221, The two alternative sets of articles 21 to 23 proposed by the Special Rapporteur drew comments from many members. Some members reiterated their position that the articles should clearly set forth the principle of immunity from measures of constraint, followed by limited exceptions to the rule. It was said that measures of constraint would strain relat!.one between States; the recent tendency in some developed countries to restrict State immunity ;Irom execution was a dangerous departure from the rules of sovereign immunity of States and should be curbed rather than encouraged by the Commission. In this connection, one member referred to the proposed reformulation of article 21 that he had proposed at the previous session, lQ9.i though he would further study the Special Rapporteur’s recommendation for the article. i!lQQ/ vRecords_pf_ _the-se t-.rnL.. I.0 (A/44/10), Chapter VI, para. 578. - 103. -222, Notwithstanding these reservations, the Commission’s discussion of the two alternativa articles indicated general support for the approach adOptQd by the Special Rapporteur in the second alternative, including the idea of merging articles 21 and 22. 223. The views of members on the substance of new artiole 21 were, however, divided, in particular on two points. The first related to the proposed deletion of the phrase “property fn which it has a legally protected interest” which appeared in the original text oAthe ~ of article 21 and cf paraqraph 1 of artjcle 22, Some members supported the proposal which had the effect of focusing on “property of a foreign State” as the sole object
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the legal framework and principles related to the immunity of states from measures of constraint, particularly in the context of state-owned enterprises. The language and concepts used, such as "State enterprise", "measures of constraint", "immunity from measures of constraint", and "property of a foreign State", suggest that the topic is related to international law and diplomatic relations.

**Category**
International trade, Law