Treaty of Rome on the settlement of the interests of Italy and France in Africa, of 7 January 1935 His Majesty the King of Italy and the President of the French Republic. uesirous of ueveloping in Africa the relations of friendship anu goou neighbourliness existing between the two nations and. to uo this. of settling permanently the questions pending on the subject of the Conventions of:!8 September 1896 on Tunisia and of article 13 of the Agreement of Loni.Ion of :!6 April 1915. have designated for their plenipotentiaries. as follows: His Majesty the King of Italy: Benito Mussolini. Heal.I of Government. Minister for Foreign Af­ fairs: anu the Presiuent of the French Republic: Pierre Laval. Minister for Foreign Affairs: who. having recognized their creden­ tials to he in goou anu uue form. have agreeu on the following dispositions: TITLE I TUNISIAN QUES I IONS Artie/<' I The status anu rights of the Italians anu Italian colonial subjects in Tunisia anu of the Tunisians in Italy shall be regulated by a special convention. the basis of which will he determined in a special protocol of touay·s I.late imd which the High Contracting Parties unuertal..e to negotiate with the least possible delay. so that it may come into force on the same I.late as the present treaty. TITLE II TIii. FRON 111.R Ill. I WI.EN LIIIYA AND THE 11~111 ROl'III. FRLNCH COI.ONIES Al"/icl,• :! The frontier separating Libya from French West Africa rinu French Equatorial Africa cast of Tummo. the terminal point of the line fixed hy the Treaty of Paris of I:! September 1919. will be uecidcd as follows: -A direct line leaving Tummo anu meeting the Ehi Domar Doba: -From the Ehi Dumar Doha. a straight line meeting the northeast extremity of the Ehi Dogologa: 
**Analysis**
The Treaty of Rome appears to be a diplomatic agreement between Italy and France, focusing on settling disputes and establishing boundaries in Africa. The text mentions the status of Italian and French citizens, borders, and colonial territories, indicating a primarily political and territorial scope. There is no mention of economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.

**Category**
International relations, Politics