32. Mr. GODFREY (New Zealand), speaking in explanation of vote, said that his delegation was not opposed to the convening of meetings away from headquarters duty stations, but felt that any additional costs should be borne by the host country concerned. With regard to the amendments in document A/C.5/38/L.6, his delegation regretted that the original version of draft resolution C had not been adopted, since it synthesized earlier General Assembly resolutions. His delegation also preferred the original wording of paragraphs 1 and 2 of draft resolution E. Nevertheless, the draft resolutions, as amended, were generally satisfactory. 33. Mr. VISLYKH (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) said that his delegation had not opposed the adoption of the amendments to the draft resolutions of the Committee on Conferences or the proposal made by the Kenyan delegation on the understanding that there would be no financial implications. Similarly, his delegation had not objected to the approval of the pattern of conferences for 1984 and 1985 on the understanding that the Committee on Conferences and the Secretariat would take account of the recent Fifth Committee decision on appropriations for the International Conference on Kampuchea. Items 186 and 191 of the draft calendar of conferences for 1984 and items 163 and 164 of the draft calendar for 1985 related to that Conference and its Ad Hoc Committee. The Committee on Conferences was not entitled to include those items before the General Assembly had taken a decision on the matter. It was his delegation's understanding that the Committee on Conferences would delete items 163 and 164 from the calendar of conferences for 1985. He trusted that that Committee would not, in future, include in the draft calendar any meetings for which a positive decision by the General Assembly was a prerequisite. / ... • A/C.5/38/SR.25 English ~e7 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a discussion about the scheduling of conferences and meetings, with specific references to the Committee on Conferences, the Secretariat, and the General Assembly. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it is a report or transcript of a meeting. The content does not seem to be related to any specific economic, social, or environmental issue, but rather focuses on the logistics and procedures of international meetings.

**Category**
International Affairs, Administration