organization of Atrican unity (oAU) as lhe sole and authentic represeneatiee of the Nanibian people. 6. The ussR denands an end to Ehe illegal occupation of Namibia by the raciat south African regine anal Ehe imnediate granling of genuine indePendence to Nanibia' in accordance wlth the relevant united Nations resolutlons and decisions in Eheir entirety, including securiLy council resolution 435 (19?8) of 29 Septenber 1978. The soviet union supporeed council resolution 555 (L985) of 19 June 1985 and otber united Nations resolutions in r|hich the persistent attempts of tbe united statea and south Atrica to tink che independence of Nanibia to extraneous issues are rejected. It condenna and rejects attenpta by the Pretorla authoriti.es to seek a neo-coLonialist solution of the Nanibian problen by neans of an "inEernal seEtlenent" and the establistlnent of a puppet r6gime in Namibia. 7. The reason $by the decislons of che united Nations, oAU and the foruos of the Movenent of Non-Aligned coungries in suPport of lhe just dernands of the opPressed people of Namibia still have not been inplenented lie6 in the fact that the obstructionist policy of the racist south African r6gine is being encouraged by the united stateg and a nunber of oEher nestern countries and Israel. ehlch consi.der that r6qine their ftnatural ally" and are naintaini.ng, and even strengthening' relations based on 'constructive enqagementrr l,ith south Africa in the poLitical, econonic, tinancial and military fields. 8, Particularly dangerous is the incEeased assistance beinq given Co Che South African racists by several North Atlantic Treaty organization (NATO) countries and I6rael in the creation and develoPnenE of South Africa's nuclear Potential. 9. The continuing nanoeuvres of the united states and South Africa for the naintenance of the systen of gEI.@ in south Atrica and the establishnent of a
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a declaration from the Soviet Union regarding the situation in Namibia, specifically condemning the illegal occupation of the country by South Africa and calling for its independence. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to international organizations and resolutions. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on political and international relations.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief