reach an unattainable goal. Yet for the peoples of southern Africa it is a very real hope, the fulfilment of which would begin with the end of aparrheid, the accession of Namibia to independence and the continuance of their economic and social development in peace and security. 69. Mr. TROYANOVSKY (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) (interpretation from Russian): The representa- tive of Angola has given the Security Council the incontro- vertible facts relating to the continuing aggression by the racist regime of South Africa against his country. It was because of those facts that the question of that aggression was again brought to the Council. Blood is -being shed on Angolan soil and people are perishing. Units of South Africa’s regular armed forces have invaded Angolan terri- tory and are continuing their hostilities there. The racists’ air force is attacking the positions of that country’s troops. 70. Scarcely two weeks have elapsed since the Council strongly condemned the racist Pretoria regime for its pre- meditated, persistent and sustained armed invasions of the People’s Republic of Angola and described them as a serious threat to international peace and security, demand- ing the immediate cessation of such acts of aggression, The Council adopted similar decisions two months ago, in June of this year, in connection with the invasion by South African commandos of the Angolan province of Cabinda and the raid against Gaborone, the capital of Botswana. However, the South African regime turned a deaf ear to the Council’s demands; far from ceasing such acts, it increased the scale of its aggression against Angola. 71. By its most recent invasion of Angola, South Africa is trying to forestall the inevitable rout of the armed UNITA gangs. There can be no doubt that those gangs are organized, maintained, armed and dispatched by Pretoria. 
**Analysis**
The text primarily discusses political and military conflicts in southern Africa, specifically the aggression of South Africa against Angola, Namibia, and Botswana. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on condemning the actions of the South African regime and demanding an end to the aggression. While there are no direct references to economic development, industry, or employment, the overall context is related to international relations, security, and human rights.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International relations