insistence on linking the independence of Namibia to irrelevant and extraneous issues as incompatible with Council resolution 435 (1978) and declared that the independence of Namibia could not be held hostage to the resolution of issues that were alien to resolution 435 (1978), and by which the Council decided, in the event of the continued obstruction by South Africa, to consider the adoption of appropriate measures under the Charter of the United Nations; condemned racist South Africa for sabotaging the Namibian independence talks held in 1984 at Lusaka and Mindelo by insisting on the notorious “linkage” pre-condition and introducing new insidious subterfuge as alternatives to Council resolution 435 (197”): condemned and rejected the puppet “Multi-.Party Conference” as the latest ir. a series of political stratagems through which Pretoria attempted to impose a neo-colonial settlement in Namibia: and strongly condemned the collusion betwee- South Africa, Israel and certain Western States, particularly the United States of America, in the nuclear field and called upon France and all other States to refrain from supplying the racist minority regime of South Africa, directly or indirectly, with installations that might enable it to produce uranium, plutonium or other nuclear materials, reactors or military equipment (resolution 39150 A). . - 031 8-w JIltecnarlonaiConferencee Strugr+ie op .. LLW Bamibian People..~_for Ir&&ndencal. Par_isl 25-29 April 1982 (A/CONF.120/13), part three. 64/ See S/PV.2439-2444 and 2446-2451. I.. A/45/100 English Page 125 At the same session, the General Assembly appointed Mr. Brajesh Chandra Mishra as United Nations Commissioner for Namibia for a further one-year term beginning on 1 January 1985 (see item 17 (j)) (decision 39/325). At its fortieth session, the General Assembly took special note of the Final Document containing the Declaration and Programme of Action on Namibia, adopted by the United Nations Council fo,- Namibia at its extraordinary plenary meetings held 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing the independence of Namibia and the actions of South Africa, Israel, and Western States. It highlights issues related to nuclear cooperation, sanctions, and the recognition of Namibia's independence. The tone is critical and condemnatory, suggesting that the document is more focused on political and international relations rather than economic or social development.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief