the State of Palestine, which is now under the occu­ pation of an illegitimate forgery called Israel." The representative of Iran expressed his reservations concerning operative paragraph 4 of draft resolution A/37/L.48 and Corr. I in the following words: "My delegation wonders why this specific para­ graph is so clear about where the withdrawal is to be from but not about where it is to be to. We therefore believe that that should be clearly specified. That is, this operative paragraph should contain words indi­ cating that the Zionist usurpers must withdraw from the land of Palestine and go back to their countries of origin." The representative of Democratic Yemen was also at pains to clarify his vote on draft resolution A/37/ L.45/Rev.1: "Regarding the fourth preambular paragraph, my delegation would like to state that our vote does not in any way imply an implicit recognition of Israel, which was established through terrorism and ag­ gression and which continues to exist on the basis of expansionism and racism at the expense of the rights of the Palestinian people and the other Arab peoples." Similarly, the representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya stated that: "The fourth preambular paragraph of draft reso­ lution A/37/L.45/Rev. l implies indirect recognition of a racist, aggressive entity based on terrorism and the policy of expansionism. In addition to its warlike usurpation of Palestine ... We feel that the Zionist entity is a racist entity ... and that it must not be accorded any legitimacy." With regard to draft resolution A/37/L.48 and Corr. I, the representative of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya said: " ... This vote does not imply any change in the policy of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya ... nor does it mean that any international legitimacy is accorded to the aggressor Zionist entity which occupies the Arab territories." 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic document related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, with representatives from various countries expressing their views on draft resolutions and preambular paragraphs. The language used is highly politicized, with accusations of terrorism, aggression, and racism directed towards Israel. The focus is on the legitimacy and existence of the State of Israel, rather than any specific economic, social, or environmental issue.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief