19.5 per cent of ODA flows, and its total concessional assistance reached 1. 5 per cent of GNP. In comparison flows from CMEA countries \vere small, representing for ODA 2.12 bill ions dollars only, or a tenth of a percent of GDP. Table VI.D.l Total resource flmvs to developing countries, 1979-1981 (Bill ions of US dollars) 1979 1980 1981 Official development assistence 30.61 36.36 35.51 DAC 15.91 18.02 18.28 OPEC 6.58 8.26 6.91 CHEA 1.80 2.14 2.20 Other 0.12 0.20 0.20 Multilateral 6.20 7. 74 8.oo Non-ODA flows 54.97 59.31 68.49 Total flows at current prices 85.55 95.67 104.00 Total flows at 1981 prices 90.53 92.80 104.00 Sources: Develupmen_!._~9=gr~ra_!.ion, 1982 Review, (Paris, OECD, 19£2), Development Co-Er~ .. F.9!-_ion, 1981 Review, (Paris, OECD, 1981) • 33. As can be seen from table VI.D.l, ODA flows fell in current terms by 2. 3 per cent in 1981. At 1981 prices they remained stagnant, comp<:~red to a rate of growth of 2. 8 per_ cent in 1975- 123 E/ECA/CM.9/5 19eo and of 7.8 per cent in 1970-1975. In contrast, the share of non-concessional flows which had been declining since 1978 in­ creased to 66 per cent of total flows, and their volume increased by a considerable 19 per cent after falls in 1979 and 1980. If in the whole, the volume of total flows to developing countries rose by 12 per cent, the momentum of aid growth seems to have been broken, a fact confirmed by recent developments showing a growing reluctance on the part of donor countries to increase as­ sistance. 2. Resource flows to devel££~3 Africa 34. For ·1981, information is lacking on total resources flows to developing Africa. Information on the years 1977-1980 is given in table VI.D.2. It appears from the table that the evolution has not been favourable, and at 1981 prices, there has been a 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the flow of resources, specifically official development assistance (ODA) and non-ODA flows, to developing countries. The focus is on the volume and composition of these flows, as well as the trend and changes over time. The text also mentions the share of concessional and non-concessional flows, which suggests a focus on development and economic growth.

**Category**
Economic development