Aparthcid and Its DesttuctLve Consequelces ln Southern Afrlca because 1! colours justice nith a racial.and/or eEhnlc cons lderat lons . llllh respect co lhe princlple! "There shall be created anA/44/963 English pa.ge1.0 ~~;ht t~theformation andprotection ofexclusivist groupings and.thereturc, ~oracismitself. Thisiscontrary toParagraph 16.5oftheHarareDeclaration oftheOAUAd-Hoc Committee onSouthern Africa oncheQuestion ofSouthAfrica and3eoftheUnitedNations Consensus Declaration onApartheid andits Destructive Consequences inSouthern Africa. 5.3.0. Withrespect totheprinciple chat:"SouthAfricashallhavea newlC2alsvstemwhichshallguarantee equality beforethelaw.1! (16.6 HarareDeclaration oftheOAUAd-Hoc Committee onSouthern Africa onthe Question ofSouthAfricaor3fofUoitedNations Consensus Declaration on Apartheid andItsDestructive Consequences inSouthern Africa). Mr.Cerrit Viljoen's twelvepaintMinority Rightsspeech of.11May1990.thoughsilent onthetypeoflegalsystemenvisaged bytheApartheid regime. nevertheless contradicts Principle 16.6oftheHarareDeclaration oftheOAUAd-Hac Committee onSouthern Africa ontheQuestion ofSouthAfrica andJfofthe ~nitedNations Consensus Declaration onApartheid andItsDestructive Consequences inSouthern Africa. Equality ofgroups befor~ thelaw.as i~plied bythenotionof'GroupRights' intheservice ofthepreservation ofwhiteexclusivity and/ordomination isincompatible withequality of individuals beforethelaw. 5.4.0 Withrespect totheprinciple: "SouthAfricashallh.1Vean independent andnon-racial judiciarv." (16.7HarareDeclaration ofthe OAUAd-Hoc Committee onSouthern Africa antheQuestion ofSouthAfrica or3gofUnitedNations Consensus Declaration onApartheid andIts Destructive Consequences inSouthern Africa). Inhisspeechof11May 1990. ~'lr.Viljoen said,"thatanindependent judiciary willexercise judicial authority 1ncasesbetween oneperson andanother and~etween citizens andthestatell •However. helocates theseremarks within the framework ofthet~rustofhisspeech whichistheApartheid regime's perceived needtoprotect grouprights. TheApartheid regimegives priority totheprotection ofgrouprightsoverthenecessity ofan independent judiciary. Thisiscontrary toParagraph 16.7oftheHarare Declaration oftheOAUAd-Hoc Committee onSouthern Africa ontheQuestion ofSouthAfrica and3goftheUnitedNations Consensus Declaration on Apartheid andItsDestructive Consequences inSouthern Africa because itcolours justice witharacial.and/orethnicconsiderations. 5.5.0 Withrespect totheprinciple: "Thereshallbecreated an economic orderwhichshallpromote andadvance thewell-being ofall SouthAfricans." (16.8.HarareDeclaration oftheOAUAd-Hoc Committee onSouthern Africa ontheQuestion ofSouthAfricaor3hinUnited Nations Consensus Declaration onApartheid anditsDestructive /... Digitized by Dag Hammarskjöld Library\/44/963 rrDgr r5n Page 1l Ccnseauences i.n Southern Airica), Mr. F.W. de K1erk, in hls BBC interview, lays emphasi.s on the need to protect property rlgoEs. Considerin8 that nore than 802 of che lrealth and 872 of che land mass of South Africa is concentrated 14 the lrhj.te mirrori,tyrs hands, this oeans the r3cial iEbalance in favour of vhites irt the ecoooaric dlstribution of South
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a critique of the apartheid system in South Africa, focusing on its principles and consequences. It highlights the contradictions between the principles of the Harare Declaration and the actual practices of the apartheid regime. The text discusses the issues of racial and ethnic considerations in the administration of justice, the protection of group rights, and the economic order. Given the context and content of the text, it seems to be more focused on the political and social aspects of the apartheid system rather than purely economic or environmental issues.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, Culture