delimitation ofpartofthelandfrontierb...tween thetwo States. . 60.TheSpecialAgreement provided fortheseisinofa chamber underArticle26.paragraph 2.oftheStatuteofthe Court.ThisArticlestatesthattheCourtmayforma Chamber fordealingwithaparticular case. 61.Ort14Marchi985.theParties.dulyconsulted by thePresident. indicated thattheydesiredtheformation ofa chamber offivemembers. ofwhomtwowouldbejudgesad hocchosenbythemselves inaccordance withArticle31of theStatute.andconfirmed thattheydesiredtheCourtto proceed immediately totheformation ofthechamber. 62.BothStateschoseajudgeadhocunderArticle31 oftheStatuteoftheCourt.BurkinaFasoappointed Mr.F. Luchaire. andMaliappointed Mr.G.Abi-Saab. 63.On3April1985.theCourt.unanimously adopted anOrderwhereby itacceded totherequestofthetwo Governments toformaSpecialChamber offivejudgesto dealwiththefrontierdisputebetween them(/.e.l.Reports 1985.p.6).Itdeclared thatithadelectedJudgesLachs. RudaandBedjaoui toform.withthejudgesadhoc appointed bytheParties.theChamber tobt:seisedofthe case. 64.TheChamber formedtodealwiththecaseelectedusits folio Ruda 65 sittin theSl ofCc 66 inth cons 12A 1985 Parti Ap 67. reque tee0 Admi Judge the Secre 1984. hadd 71. a.:corr Holy diplon Palace welco prece 72. 74. tasks. which 75. Gover Court ofthe Sectio touch outth"'-"----"1Il'-------------------------------. I~VISITS ANDCONTACTSasitsPresident JudgeM.Bedjaoui. Itscomposition isas follows:President M.Bedjaoui; JudgesM.Lachsand1.-M. Ruda;JudgesadhocF.Luchaire andG.Abi-Saab. 65.On29April1985,theChamber helditsfirstpublic sittingatwhichJudgesadhocLuchaire andAbi-Saab made thesolemndeclaration required bytheStatuteandtheRules ofCourt. 66.ThePartieshavingconfirmed theindications given intheSpecialAgreement, andtheChamber havingbeen consulted. thePresident oftheCourt,byanOrdermadeon 12April1985(l.C.J.Reports1985,p.10),fixed3October 1985asthetime-limit forthefilingofMemorials byboth Parties. C.REQUEST FORADVISORY OPINION Application forreviewofJudgement No.333ofthe UnitedNationsAdministrative Tribunal 67.On10September 1984,theCourtreceived a requestforanadvisory opinion. submitted bytheCommit­ teeon Applications forReviewofJudgements ofthe Administrative TribunaloftheUnitedNations, inrespectof Judgement No.333,deli\:ered atGenevaon8June1984by theAdministrative Tribunal inthecaseofYakimetz v. Secretary-General oftheUnited Nations. On23August 1984.attherequestoftheinterested party,theCommittee haddecidedtorequestanadvisory opinionfromtheCourt, A.VISITS OFHEADS OFSTATE 71.TheCourtreceived HisHoliness PopeJohnPaulIl, a.::companied, amongothers,bytheSecretary ofStateofthe HolySee,atapublicsittingheldinthepresence ofthe diplomatic corpsintheGreatHallofJusticeofthePeace Palace. President Nagendra Singhgaveanaddressof welcome towhichthePoperepliedwithaspeech.Thiswas preceded byaprivatemeeting. 72.1-lisMajesty KingHussein andQueenNoorofunderArticleIIoftheStatuteoftheAdministrative Tribunal. 68.ByanOrderdated13September 1984,thePresi­ dentfixed14December 1984asthetime-limit forthe submission ofwrittenstatements bytheUnitedNationsand itsMember States,inaccordance withArticle66,paragraph 2,oftheStatuteoftheCourt(I.e.J.Reports1984,p.212). ByanOrderof30November 1984,thistime-limit was extended to 28February 1985(ibid.,p.639).Statements havebeensubmitted bytheGovernments oftheUnionof SovietSocialist Republics, Italy,CanadaandtheUnited StatesofAmerica, andonbehalfoftheSecretary-General oftheUnitedNations. Thelatterhasalsotransmitted a statement onbehalfofthepersonwhowasthesubjectofthe judgement delivered bytheAdministrative Tribunal. 69.ThePresident oftheCourtfixed31May1985as thetime-limit withinwhichStatesandtheOrganization havingfiledwrittenstatements mightsubmitwrittencom­ mentsonthestatements presented byothers,inaccordance withArticle66,paragraph 4,oftheStatute.Following the requestbytheapplicant towhichtheSecretary-General saw noobjection andbyadecision ofthePresident, thetime­ limitwasextended toIJuly1985. 70.Writtencomments weresubmitted bytheGovern­ mentoftheUnitedStr'tesofAmerica andbytheSecretary­ GeneraloftheUnitedNations whoalsotransmitted the comments ofthepersonwhowasthesubjectofthe judgement delivered bytheAdministrative Tribunal. JordanvisitedtheCourt,accompanied by,amongothers, PrinceClausoftheNetherlands andthePrime Minister of Jordan.Themeeting tookplaceinprivate. B.OTHER CONTACTS 73.ManytalksandlecturesontheCourtweregivenby thePresident, byMembers oftheCourtorbyofficialsofthe Registry inordertoimprove publicunderstanding ofits functioning." ~ADMINISTRATIVE QUESTIONS 74.Tofacilitate theperformance ofitsadministrative tasks,theCourthasconstituted thefollowing committees. whichmetseveraltimesduringtheperiodunderreview: -theBudgetary andAdministrative Committee, com­ posedofthePresident, theVice-President andJudges T.O.Elias,1.Sette-Camara andS.M.Schwebel;
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a report of the activities of the International Court of Justice, specifically regarding the delimitation of a border dispute between Burkina Faso and Mali. The report mentions the formation of a special chamber of judges to deal with the case, as well as the submission of written statements and comments by various countries and organizations. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or social issues related to the border dispute, but rather focuses on the judicial process and procedures. Therefore, it is unlikely that the text falls under any of the categories related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, international trade, health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid.

**Category**
International law, Humanitarian aid and relief