“For this reason, the Comorian Government wishes once again to call upon the Secretary-Qenersl to us8 his good offices and continue his role of mediator with a view to bringing the two parties together in tho search for a just and eguitable settlement that respects the territorial integrity and sovereignty of the Islamic Federal Republic of the Comoros.” IV.INFORXATION PROVIDED BY THE ORQANIZATION OF AFRICAN UNITY 7.Two communicstions were received from OAU on the question of the Comorian island of Mayotte. In a letter dated 10 April 1990, the Secretary-General of OAU stated that, at the time of writing, there had been no new developments on the subject. In a letter dated 21 September 1990, the Secretary-Qeneral of the United Nations was informed that the question of MSyOtt8 had been considered at the twenty-sixth Assembly of H80dS of State and Government of OAU, held at Addle Ababa, from 9 to 11 July 1990, and that the Assembly had adopted a resolution, the operative paragraphs of which, reed in part as follows: “The Assembly of Heads of State and GOV8rMI8nt of the Organisation of African Unity, 1,. . . /. . .A/45/640 English Page 5 "2 Im the sovereignty of the Islsmic Federal Republic of the Comoro8 over the Conorian Island of Mayotter "3. &ppg&R to the Frenoh Qovernmeat to satisfy th8 legitimate claims of the Comorian Qovernment, as indicated in the relevant OAU and United Nations reSOlUtiOn8, thOS8 of the Mcvemont of Non-Aligned Countries, of the Islamic Confrrenco and of the League of Arab Statear "4.m its solidarity with the Comorian people in their determination to teaover their politioal integrity and d8f8nd their sovereignty and territorial integrityr “6.m the OAU member States to extend utmost efforts, individually and collectively, in order to inform and sensitiae the French and
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic communication between the Comorian Government and the Organization of African Unity (OAU) regarding the territorial dispute between Comoros and France over the island of Mayotte. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a focus on international relations and politics rather than economic or social issues.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief