particular the holding of meetings of the Council away from headquarters, which was contrary to the provisions of resolution 31/140. 54. Mr. STEENBERGER (Denmark) said that his delegation was not opposed to the additional appropriations that had been requested, but it would abstain to show its concern at the exceptions to General Assembly resolutions that were envisaged. 55. Mr. van HELLENBERG HUBAR (Netherlands), said that, if the Committee had been voting separately on the estimates for each of the draft resolutions, the Netherlands delegation would have taken a different attitude, but as matters stood, it could only vote against the proposals, a number of which involved deviatios from resolutions adopted by the General Assembly. 56. Mr. LAHLOU (Morocco) said that his delegation would vote in favour of the proposal. Morocco considered that it was very useful to hold meetings away from headquarters in order to gain wider public support for the Namibian cause, and he appealed to Member States to host such meetings so that their peoples could play a direct part in action to promote Namibia's independence. 57. Mr. HERIJANTO (Indonesia) emphasized the role of the Council for Namibia in mobilizing the international community. The General Assembly at its previous session had approved a similar programme of work for the Council. The Indonesian delegation would vote for the proposal. 58. At the request of the representative of the United Republic of Cameroon, a recorded vote was taken on the Chairman's proposal. In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Barbados, Benin, Bhutan, Botswana, Bulgaria, Burma, Burundi, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Central African Republic, Chile, China, Congo, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Democratic Yemen, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, Ethiopia, Finland, Gabon, German Democratic Republic, Ghana, Greece, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Ireland, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Lebanon, Lesotho, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the activities of the United Nations Council for Namibia, which suggests that the topic is related to international politics and diplomacy. The mention of "meetings away from headquarters" and "deviations from resolutions adopted by the General Assembly" implies that the topic is specific to the functioning of the Council and its relationship with the General Assembly.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief