which they all agreed, without ambiguity, that no danger of extermination had threatened Israel before the Six-Day War. 38. SO, from these two postures-having no designs on any Arab territory and having fought just as a reaction to a threat, and now satisfied that they have defeated the threat-what remains of the Israeli posture in the Council in June 1967 is the insistence on holding direct negotiations under the Israeli occupation, between Israel and the countries it occupies. This 1 do not think Israel will change. I do not think it will change because, as a victor, Israel deems it to be its right to meet the vanquished and dictate its terms. Further, this operation must and should be carried out only outside this Organization, and only while the forces of occupation can make this dictation possible. 39. Since November 1967 the Security Council has met several times to consider certain subjects and matters emanating from this complaint-important matters such as Jerusalem. The Council’s resolutions are on record. They certainly have the same weight as all other resolutions. The Council has adopted resolutions on the repeated attacks and acts of violence committed by Israel in the region, and has also adopted several other resolutions. 40: The General Assembly, at four sessions, has also discussed the situation of the continuing aggression and the persisting military occupation of our countries. On 8 December 1972, the General Assembly resolved to refer the question to the Security Council [resolution 2949 (xVrrl/. It is now before us. 41.. All those United Nations resolutions have, alas, remained mere documents, pieces of paper, known by numbers, repeated like charms, and their magic has been no match for the power of the aggressor. Today, six long years after the Israeli military attack on 5 June 1967, the heavy 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic speech or statement regarding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, specifically addressing the situation six years after the Six-Day War in 1967. It discusses the occupation of Arab territories, the role of the United Nations, and the lack of implementation of resolutions. The tone is critical of Israel's actions and emphasizes the need for direct negotiations.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International relations