Resolution 214 (1965) or 27 September 1965 The Security Council, Noting the reports of the Secretary-General, 36 Reaffirming its resolutions 209 (1965) of 4 September, 210 (1965) of 6 September and 211 (1965) of 20 Sep­ tember 1965, Expressing its grave concern that the cease-fire agreed to unconditionally by the Govemments of India and Pakistan is not holding, Recal/ing that the cease-fire demand in the Council's resolutions was unanimously endorsed by the Council and agreed to by the Govemments of both India and Pakistan, Demands that the parties urgently honour their commitments to the Council to observe the cease-fire, and further calls upon the parties promptly to withdraw all armed personnel as necessary steps in the full imple­ mentation of resolution 211 (1965). Adopted at the 1245th meeting.81 Decision At its 1248th meeting, on 27 October 1965, the Coun­ cil, pursuant to its invitation to the representatives of lndia and Pakistan to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question, decided, in the absence of the representative of India, to invite the representative of Pakistan to take a seat at the Council table, it being understood that the representative of India was invited to take a seat at the Council table at any time if be so wished. Resolution 215 (1965) or 5 November 1965 The Security Counci/, Regretting the delay in the full achievement of a complete and effective cease-fire and a prompt withdrawal of armed personnel to the positions held by them before 5 August 1965, as called for in its resolutions 209 (1965) of 4 September, 210 (1965) of 6 September, 211 (1965) of 20 September and 214(1965) of 27 September 1965, 1. Reaffirms its resolution 211 (1965) in .Jl its parts; 2. Requests the Govemments of India and Pakistan to 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be related to international relations and conflict resolution, specifically referring to a conflict between India and Pakistan. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with the Security Council making demands and requests to the governments of both countries. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or social issues.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International relations