aparzheid. These meetings of the Council have been con- vened to draw attention to and take suitable international action against the acts of aggression being committed by Pretoria against the independent State of Angola. The rep resentative of Angola has given the Council a clear and detailed report of the aggressive actions that the South African regime has taken and continues to take in Angola. 33. My country, along with the other members of the Movement of Non-Aligned Countries, has always deplored the actions of the minority Government of South Africa as it has continued to engage in acts of aggression against the front-line States, in the latest instance a fellow country member of the Movement, Angola. 34. The Council has demanded that South Africa scrupu- lously respect the territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty of Angola. Despite the resolutions that we have adopted and despite the universal condemnation heaped upon South Africa for its perfidious conduct in destabilizing Angola, the racist Government of South Africa continues to divert attention from its putrid policy of apartheid at home by forays which the international community condemns in unequivocal terms as the desper- ate acts of a doomed regime. 3 35. South Africa, in this instance and in the instances that we have recently seen, continues to,serve its own self- ish purposes by mounting from time to time aggressive incursions into the front-line States. By now the interna- tional community in general and the Security Council in particular must surely recognize these acts of cowardice as threats to the peace and security not only of southern Africa but of the entire world. 36. These aggressive acts and raids into the front-line States will no doubt be resisted by ,the peoples of those States. When aggression’ is heavily backed up with the exploited resources of an oppressed black people, such acts 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement condemning the actions of South Africa against Angola, focusing on the aggression and threats to peace and security. It does not mention economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues, nor does it touch on health, education, employment, or humanitarian aid. The tone suggests a political and international context, making it more likely to fall under categories related to international relations or global governance. The language used also implies a scientific or technological context, but this is not the primary focus of the text.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief