23 April 1986, stating that he was no longer being considered for re-employment in the United Nations. XX.These new issues had not been raised, either in the Applicant's original letter to the Secretary-General of 6 March 1985, or in his letter dated 14 June 1985, by which he instituted the proceedings before the JAB. XXI.The Tribunal recalls Judgement No. 459, Moore-Woodroffe (1989), paragraph XIII, in which it stated: "The Tribunal recalls its disapproval of attempts to raise new issues which have not been properly put before the JAB by an applicant. See Judgement No. 446, San José (1989) and No. 449, Janitschek (1989)."- 16 - XXII.The Tribunal therefore finds these new issues to have been beyond the scope of the jurisdiction of the JAB as constituted to consider the Applicant's appeal. And since the Secretary-General and the Applicant did not enter into an agreement to submit these new issues directly to the Tribunal in accordance with paragraph 1 of article 7 of the Tribunal's Statute, they are not receivable and the Tribunal cannot enter into their merits. XXIII.For the foregoing reasons, the Tribunal: 1.Orders the Respondent: (a)To pay to the Applicant a sum equal to six months net base salary as compensation; (b)To correct the Applicant's medical record, if this has not yet been done, to show that as of 9 August 1985, the Applicant was medically fit for United Nations employment. 2.Rejects all other pleas of the Applicant. (Signatures) Roger PINTO President Jerome ACKERMAN First Vice-President Ahmed OSMAN Second Vice-President Geneva, 11 May 1990 R. Maria VICIEN-MILBURN Executive Secretary 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a judgment or decision made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (JAB) regarding a dispute between an applicant and the Secretary-General of the United Nations. The dispute seems to be related to the applicant's employment status and compensation. The text mentions the applicant's medical record, salary, and employment contract, which suggests that the issue is employment-related. However, the text also touches on the jurisdiction of the JAB and the Tribunal's Statute, which may imply some connection to international law or governance.

**Category**
Employment, International trade