chauvinism and trave exposed the deeply belligerent nood prevailing in the southagainst the Turkish Cypriot people. 2.The resofution of the EuroDean Parfiament. 04 15 March 1990, only three days after the adoption of Security Councilresolution 649 (1990), the creek/creek Cypriot side, disturbeal by a United Nationsresolution devoid of vindictive propaganda elements, have engineered a completelyone-sided resolution in the European par]iament.. gross.Ly inconsistent with theletter and spirit of Council resolution 649. The resoLution of the EuropeanParliament, which ained at nothing but accusing and discreditiDg the TurkishCypriot side and its leadership, was hailed as a propagandla victory'and innediatelyput to use in the service of Greek Cypriot disinformation tactics. Over the years, the Greek Cypriots have accumulated resolutions, which lack any rnoral or political weight,. frorn international forums where the Turkish Cypriot side is notrepresented. The present situation is adequate testirnony to the fact that tshis depLorable practice has only nade a negotiated solution nore difficult. Theresolution of the European Parfiameng, coning irnnediately after Security Councilresolution 649 (1990) provides a clear contrast between the road to a f,air and negotiated settlenent and propaganda tactics that erode the chalces for such asettlenent.A/44/937 S/21245 English Page3 APPENDIX Letter dated10April1990fromMr.KenanAtakol totheSecretary General Security Council resolution 549(1990), initsparagraph 5,callsonthe parties concerned tollrefrain fromanyaction thatcouldaggravate thesituationll. Sincetheadoption ofthatresolution on12March1990,theGreekCypriot sidehas engaged inthefollowing activities thatareincontradiction withtheabovecall oftheSecurity Council. 1.Violation ofthebuffer zoneandtheterritory oftheTurkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, andhostile demonstrations. Bothbefore andaftertheadoption ofSecurity Council resolution 549(1990), fiveGreekCypriots, oneofthemasoldier oftheGreekCypriot so-called "National Guard", hadillegally entered theTRNCfortrouble-making purposes. Theywere arrested bytheTurkish Cypriot police, brought totrialandsentenced toshort termsofimprisonment. TwOofthemhavecompleted theirsentences andhavebeen returned toSouthCyprus through theUnited Nations ForceinCyprus (UNFICYP). Usingthoseprovoked incidents asapretext, GreekCypriot leadership hasorganized demonstrations ofstudents, whichhavefueled feelings ofhostility andimpeded movement between thesouthandthenorth. AllentryintotheTRNCthrough the LedraPalace border gate,evenbydiplomats serving ontheisland, havebeen effectively blocked. Rather thanadvising calmandcommon sense, theGreekCypriot
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a formal statement or report discussing the political situation in Cyprus, specifically focusing on the actions of the Greek Cypriot side and their impact on the Turkish Cypriot people. It mentions international resolutions, buffer zones, and territorial violations, indicating a strong focus on international relations and conflict resolution. The text also highlights the humanitarian aspects of the situation, such as the detention of individuals and the blocking of movement between the north and south. Overall, the text seems to be more focused on the political and humanitarian aspects of the situation rather than economic or environmental issues.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief