2--(Yr.a('rEac).L qJ. . .E.x.H.o()N g aY F or o(t (.,(t o a{ ()d o<1 a,.H .H .z .F .< .< .< .Ulc{.\l < a!rr(t < (! urar t! <l t! (! t! o| o. ..iz tlt ,'zoo ur '2:o:& :9;I d:'FO< H,Hd{J !l< q -> .Jezr) zFH I Ul UJc .o .FuJ<E -(Jzz> I = :="iE=."R :=539.5 ':o!oo9o9o'EoH-13'1:9r =331qo:B::3:fi::EPfi:iF:=: Naoa! >.tNoo=a{ct <c! <a!z z oo o F=I zz 6A/40/3),3/Add.l Engl i sh Page 29 I (, o FI o. E.1 oo (., EO 6 rQ c o! € do. oo oo.r t). oo6(', () ot5 llj.ae o Oo '!{ o \.oz 5z o(, oo- 22 c z z/z I r-H >d F oOJE'< HFH UO-2ol9(Do|oo6rFoaoo6-oaort- -oFo -FoI -C) zd, t-83! -oF z -UJZ -gc cl - u.rF ez ><f F.) 2-<2-! IgH 20 oE\+ =P xr 3 a6P o oo(, o(, ooa qr rUoI6zt. cr. ^ u thd.. o. erOF Z u,r , z .tzzF oF .d < olrur<F FJO|u Fl.r=O +aJ Fuz-, tz<uld?z -tF <I<F OE dO<O - c)(J o!4Jo rr=(J J HO< E <oH6@(,F J4 0l! - cr(l) lrJourr!>z<r <(0D FHFFF E'IJ<i!JT5 F UJ UJOJOFJ Oc{-t,{Eaac{c{,o o . ur-o,.{Lr> o(r)c)srA/ 40 / 3L3 /Add . L Engl ish Page 30 part II I. In order to approxinate the opportunity costs of using conscripts in thenilltary aector, the foLloaing infornat.ion is requested: (al The average ci.vilian eage rate that the conscripta eould bave been likelyto obtain during tbe reporting year if they had noE been occupied in lhe nilitaryaector. An6$er: 3,350 FlMhonth rf s\rch an estinate ls not availabre, respondents are requested to suggest anaverage civili.an eage rate that nay be readily avaitable and that Ehe respondentsbelieve night. serve as a reasonable neaaure of opportuni ty costs. (b) The nuober of nan-yeara devoted by conscripts to nilitary service duringEhe reporting year concerned. Ansser: 27,270
**Analysis**
The text appears to be related to military conscription and the economic opportunity costs of using conscripts in the military sector. The request for information about the average civilian wage rate and the number of years devoted to military service suggests that the focus is on the economic impact of conscription on individuals and society.

**Category**
Employment, Industry