pathy to the families of those killed and injured in these attacks. 101. The Australian Government has consistently con- demned South Africa’s attacks this year against Angola and Botswana, as well as the attacks in recent years against other neighbouring countries of South Africa. 102. Australia rejects South Africa’s claim to any right to enter the sovereign territory of its neighbours against their will. Australia cannot condone the doctrine of tutorial or punitive aggression. Australia may be geographically far removed from southern Africa, but we follow very closely developments in that region. 103. South Africa’s repugnant apartheid policies, its aggressions against its neighbours and its refusal to relin- quish control of Namibia constitute fundamental viola- tions of international law and human rights which, as we have said many, too many, times, are totally unacceptable to us. 104. Australia was pleased to be asked to participate in the Commission of Investigation formed by the Security Council in application of resolution 571 (1985) to evaluate as soon as possible the damage resulting from the previous invasion of Angola by South African forces in September of this year. Our participation reflects our concern that all members of the international community, and particularly members of the Council, have a role to play in containing the escalation of violence which has occurred in recent months in Angola and in other parts of southern Africa. 105. When acts, good or bad, occur frequently, there is an imperceptible tendency somehow to become accus- tomed to such acts. It is the duty of members of the Coun- cil not to grow accustomed to such acts, but to maintain and to re-emphasize condemnation of illegal actions in the hope that repetition will oblige South Africa to accept the established norms of international behaviour. Therefore, 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a diplomatic statement condemning South Africa's aggressive actions against its neighbors, and expressing Australia's commitment to upholding international law and human rights. The language used is formal and official, suggesting that it is a government statement or a speech. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or other specific issues related to development or trade, but rather focuses on international relations, security, and human rights.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International trade