possessing executive or judicial authority 2. stricto sensu (EN, SCO), a public officer possessing judicial authority to determine causes F 1. magistrat 2. magistrat du siège - juge S 1. magistrado 2. magistrado - juez F magistrat instructeur (BI) E examining magistrate S See E note to juez 1. V. magistrat 1< V. magistrat 2., juge 1. V. magistrado 1. V. magisir^fldfl 2., jgsz. I* magistrats et juges non professionnnels E judges and lay magistrates In the F expression, magistrat is the term indicating a higher status than juge; in the E expression, it is necessary to invert the terns in order to convey the flavour of the original S magistratura = F magistrature S magistratura de trabajo (ES) E labour court F conseil de prud'hommes S magistratura tutelar de menores (ES) LOPJ disposición transitoria 19; obs. Of a province or town Denominada también tribunal tutelar de menores; LOPJ disposición transitoria 4; obs. E juvenile court F juge des tutelles magistrature (CG, FR) V. Conseil supérieur de la magistrature Ecole nationale de la magistrature Ordonnance no. 58-1270 . Utilisé pour la plupart pour correspondre au sens de magistrat 2.; FR Ord. 1270 22.12.1958, 1; Guillien - 713 - E magistrature - magistracy S magistratura F magistrature assise (FR) E judiciary - judges Invariably used in accordance with the meaning of magistrate 2. Ossorio; invariably used in accordance with the meaning of magistrado 2.; CL COT 246 EGLAT avocats généraux The magistrats assis collectively; note 4 F magistrature debout (FR) E government procurators EGLAT avocats généraux; note 28 The magifitEflts du ministère public collectively, i.e. the Parquet: in criminal matters can be called prosecutors. public prosecutors or prosecution agrvice; OCL Parquet: note 4 F magistrature du parquet (FR) = magistrature debout F maison centrale (FR) CPP 717, D.70, D.70.1 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a glossary of legal terms related to judicial authority, magistrates, and courts. The language used is predominantly French, with some English and Spanish terms. The content does not seem to be related to specific economic or industrial sectors, nor does it discuss natural resources, environmental issues, or humanitarian aid. It does not appear to be focused on education, culture, or science and technology either. Employment and health are not explicitly mentioned. The text is more geared towards legal and judicial concepts.

**Category**
Justice, Law and Human Rights