Small Territories introduced the report of the Sub-Committee (^B^C.109B3^.1734), cont23n3ng 2n 2Ccount of its consider2tion of the Terr3tory (^B^C.109BP^.1363). 81. ^t the same meeting, the representative of Tunisia, in his capacity as Chairman of the Sub-Committee on Small Territories, made a statement (^B^C.109BP^.1363). Decision of the Special Committee 82. ^t the 1363rd meeting, on 1 August 1990, following a statement by the representative of New Zealand, the administering Power concerned (^B^C.109BP^.1363), the Special Committee adopted the report of the Sub-Committee on Small Territories and endorsed the conclusions and recommendations contained therein. The text of the conclusions and recommendations is reproduced below (see also para. 114, draft resolution ^III)^ (1) The Special Committee reaffirms the inalienable right of the people of Tokelau to self-determination and independence in accordance with the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to СоЗопЗаЗ Countr3es and Peop3es, contained in General assembly resolut3on 1514 (^) of 14 December 1960. (2) The Special Committee reiterates the view that such factors as territorial size, geographical location, size of population and limited natural resources should in no way delay the speedy 3mp3ementat3on of the Declaration, which fully applies to Tokelau. -27-(3) The Special Committee reiterates further that it is the responsibility of the administering Power to create such conditions in the Territory as will enable the people of Tokelau to exercise freely and without interference their inalienable right to self-determination and independence in accordance with General assembly resolution 1514 (^), as well as all other relevant resolutions of the assembly. (4) The Special Committee reaffirms that it is ultimately for the people of Tokelau themselves to determine freely their future political status. In this connection, the Committee reaffirms the importance of fostering an awareness among the people of the Territory of the possibilities open to them 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the self-determination and independence of a small territory, Tokelau, and the responsibilities of the administering Power in this regard. It does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. The language used is more focused on political and human rights issues.

**Category**
Politics, Human Rights