disclose any other information for the purposes of a proceeding before a court of another State shall entail no consequences other than those which may result from such conduct in relation to the merits of the case. In particular, no fine or penalty shall be imposed on the State by reason oE such failure or refusal. 2. A State is not required to provide any security, bond or deposit, however described, to qllarantee the payment of judicial costs or expenses in any proceeding to which it is a party before a court of another State.” - 110 -238. Members’ views differed about the proposed addition. A number of members were in favour of the addition, one on the understanding that it was the plaintiff State that decided to bring a case before the courts and that could thus be said to submit, unlike the defendant State, to the same rules as those applying to any other plaintiff. Some other members were however opposed to the addition, holding the view that non-requirement of security should not be limited to defendant States alone. The Special Rapporteur noted that the matter involved legal technicalities and should be referred to the Drafting Committee . Article* Nan-discriminationlQz/ 239, The Special Rapporteur noted that the views of members on this article were divided as to whether or not this article should be retained. His suggestion was to retain the article in its present form for the time being, as this subject would require careful consideration after general agreement was reached on the preceding articles, 240. With the exception of two members, all members who spoke on the article proposed its deletion. In this connection, one member stated that the provision woulrl encourage a restrictive application of the draft articles, contrary to the very purpose of codificationr moreover, it might be
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing international law and the codification of rules for proceedings before a court of another State. It mentions the requirement for security, bonds, or deposits to guarantee payment of judicial costs or expenses, which suggests a legal or judicial context. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a focus on legal or administrative matters.

**Category**
International law