Committee, we have set aside our reservations about document CD/863 and agreed to accept that non-negotiating text as the mandate. It is our intent to participate fully in the work of the Committee, listening carefully to the views of others, presenting our views and sharing the results of our research and relevant technologies. A comprehensive nuclear test ban remains a long-term United States objective. Such a ban must be viewed in the context of a time when the United States no longer needs to depend on nuclear deterrence to ensure international security and stability. And when the following have been achieved: broad, deep and verifiable arms reductions; greatly improved verification capabilities; expanded confidence-building measures; and greater balance in conventional forces. In sum, the United States will continue to approach the question of a nuclear test ban with a step-by-step approach which takes into account the security criteria I just mentioned. Only in this way can we prudently preserve our security and the security of others to whom we have commitments as substantial political change proceeds in the international arena. Mr, SMIDOVICH (Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) (translated from Russian): The USSR delegation fully subscribes to the views expressed by Ambassador Dietze in his statement on behalf of the Group of Eastern European and Other Countries, of which the Soviet Union is a member. The USSR delegation intends to take a most active part in the work of the recently established Ad hoc Committee in all areas of its activity. The aim of our efforts remains unchanged: the earliest possible full ban on nuclear^- weapon tests. The Soviet Union's main approaches to the achievement of this aim were set out in the statement by the Head of the USSR delegation to the Conference on Disarmament, S. Batsanov, on 28 June this year. Thank you very much. CD/PV.565 15
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a statement from a government delegation, specifically the United States and the Soviet Union, discussing their positions on a comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty. The language used suggests a focus on international relations, security, and diplomacy, rather than any of the other categories.

**Category**
International relations, Science and technology