the Secretary-General's proposal, and would vote against it. 72. Mr. AMNEUS (Sweden), speaking on behalf of the Nordic countries, said that to reject the proposed reclassification could be damaging to the morale of field Personnel, especially in view of the upgrading of certain Headquarters posts already agreed to by the Committee. A/C.S/40/SR.36 English Page 14 73. Mr. BOKHARI (Pakistan) agreed with the previous speaker. The reclassification, moreoever, would be commensurate to the exceptional management calibre required for the post in question. 74. At the request of the representative of the United States of America, a recorded vote was taken on the proposal contained in documents A/C.S/40/12 and Corr.l. In favours Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Benin, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Congo, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, Gabon, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Ivory Coast, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, Qatar, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Sudan, Swaziland, Sweden, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, United States of America, Venezuela, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zambia. Againsta Belgium, Bulgaria, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Czechoslovakia, France, German Democratic Republic, Germany, Federal Republic of, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Japan, Mongolia, Poland, Portugal, Spain, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Abstainings Non~. 75. The proposal was adopted by 77 votes to 18. 76. Mr. MILLER (United States of America), speaking in explanation of vot~, said that his delegation had been able to support the proposal in the context of the overall management structure and the overall increase in appropriations. 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a discussion about the management structure of an organization, specifically the reclassification of a certain post. The speakers mention the morale of field personnel, the caliber of management required for the post, and the overall management structure. The voting results also suggest that the proposal is related to the organization's internal management. Based on this, it is likely that the category is related to administration or management.

**Category**
Administration, International Relations