flriialaeieal 3 6 -3 10. ·c:h•ical 4 .5 •I .,, AadcultU1'al .5 8 -3 16 Physico-~th.atical 6 1 +4 3 Peclqoaic~l T. 9 -2 t2 Biotoaical 8 7 +l 7 Biatoric.d 9 10 •I 13' !cocoaaical 10 3 +7 .Azt Ctiticia II 13 -2 11 Geological-MineraloJical 12 II +I 4 -flt.Ua•opla:lo.J. 13 12 +1. 6 Geoaraphical 14 14 0 14 . Veteriury 1.5 16 -I 18 Law 16 IS +I s Architecture 17 17 0 a Phanzaca"'tics 18 18 0 IS . 394 Professional mobility In science has turned Into ~ •ass phenomenon under cond It tons of sc le"htl flc-teehn1eal progress._ t n accordance with the data of mass surveys of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel at acade•lc and branch Institutes and higher educational Institutions. a certain number of the personnel works not·ln conformity with the specialization g~tned at the higher educational ~nstttutton. They even changed not only their specialization but even their profession stated In the diploma on. graduation <see Table No.3). Table No.3 Distribution of Scientific Workers by Degree of Correspondence of Basic Education to Subject Work at Different Types of Scientific Organizations I ---------------------------------~--------------------------------Correspond completely to specia­ lization at higher edu­ cational Institution 2 Do not correspond to narrow specia­ lization at higher educational Insti­ tution b4t corres­ pond to general profession stated In diploma 3 Refer to Do not cor science respond. & with gen-do not eral pro• refer to fesslon adjacent stated In area of diploma science 4 5 -----------------------------------------------------------------Scientific workers of USSR Academy of Sciences I 7. 8 {chemical& physics) Scientific workers of branch scie-ntific res 34.6 earch Ins-titutes (chemlco­ technologlcal profile) Professor teachIng personnel (chairs of 30.5 chemical and cheasl co•tec·hno- log teal prof I Ia) 47.3 29.5 5.4 . 39.8 22.4 3.6 56.3 9.5 3.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the phenomenon of professional mobility among scientific personnel, specifically in the fields of science and technology. It presents data on the distribution of scientific workers by degree of correspondence of their basic education to their subject work at different types of scientific organizations. The text does not mention economic or financial aspects, nor does it focus on human activities such as agriculture, forestry, or fishing. The language used is technical and specialized, indicating a focus on scientific and educational matters.

**Category**
Science and technology, Education