reflect universal practice and therefore were not appropriate for a general convention. It was also suggested that they might open the door to foreign jurisdiction even in the absence of any link between the property and the forum Stete. One member, however, cautioned against accepting the proposal to delete the subparagraphs without thinking through the effects of such a deletion, In his view, the cases in question, in respect of which there should certainly be no immunity, did not seem to be covered by other more general provisioner the Commission should therefore either retain them or add some general provieions. Another member, while agreeing to the Special Rapporteur’s suggestion for the deletion of terminology which was not universally accepted, hoped that the underlying concept, which was universally valid, would not be lost in consequence, 194. Two membors were also concerned that subparagraph (b) of paragraph 1 might allov jurisdiction of a foreign court,, even if there was n3 link between the property and the forum State, and euggestecl that wording be included, as ’ in paragraph 1 (a), to provide that the property was situated in the forum State. Another member felt that paragraph 1 (b) should be deleted. (e) any right or interest of the State in the administration of trust property or property otherwise held on a fiduciary basis. 2. A court of another State shall not be prevented from exercising jurisdiction in any proceeding brought before it against a person other than a State, notwithstanding the fact that the proceeding relates to, or is designed to deprive the State of, property; (a) which is in the possession or control of the State; or (b) in which the State claims a right or interest, if the State itself could not have invoked immunity had t.he pr~ocaeclirq
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing legal principles and jurisdictional issues related to international law, specifically with regards to immunity and property rights. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting that it is from a legal or diplomatic context. The topics being discussed, such as jurisdiction, immunity, and property rights, are also consistent with international law and diplomacy.

**Category**
International law, Jurisdiction and Diplomacy