objections, may I take it that the Conference adopts the timetable? it was sp-degided. The PRESIDENT (translated from Spanish ): I would like now to turn to the closing date for the 1990 session of the Conference. I wish to inform you that as a result of the consultations which have taken place over the past few days, there seems to be agreement on concluding our work on Friday 24 August. This is on the clear understanding that the plenary meeting that is scheduled for Thursday 23 August will be put off to the next day at 4.30 p.m. May I take it that there are no objections to the date proposed? it was so decided. The PRESIDENT (translated from Spanish ): I would now like to make my closing statement as President from Peru for the month of June 1990. As this is the last plenary meeting at which I will serve as President on behalf of Peru, I wish to share with you some thoughts in my capacity as outgoing President. First of all, I should note that the work of the second part of the 1990 session began in good time in keeping with the tradition of the Conference on Disarmament, and that includes the activities of subsidiary bodies. The programme of work for the second half of the session was adopted and, after successful consultations, we reached the hoped-for consensus on the date for the closing of the 1990 session - that is, we will conclude our work on 24 August next. We have had six plenary meetings including this one. In the six meetings we have had less than 10 speakers, and I must confess that sometimes I felt somewhat lonely in plenary. But at all events I am pleased 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a transcript of a meeting or conference, specifically the Conference on Disarmament, where the president is summarizing the progress and outcomes of the meeting. The focus is on the schedule, closing date, and final remarks, which suggests a more administrative or organizational context rather than a specific policy or technical topic.

**Category**
Disarmament, International relations