sary there should still remain in existence the aberration constituted by the occupation of Namibia by racist South Africa. South Africa’s tactics of aggression and repression-which we once again condemn-cannot delay indefinitely the attainment of independence by the Namibian people. In this regard, Tunisia feels that Security Council resolution 435 (1978) is the comer- stone and the sole valid framework for any just and lasting settlement of the Namibian problem.“’ 84.’ Nevertheless it transpires that the armed incursions of South Africa into Angola are not simply designed to compromise the independence of Namibia but also, and this has become quite obvious, to distract the attention of international public opinion from the deteriorating situa- tion in South Africa as a result of the progressive and inexorable break-up of the odious regime of apartheid. 90. The facts presented by the representative of the Peo- ple’s Republic of Angola at the beginning of this debate are overwhelming and speak for themselves. The South African air force deliberately violated Angolan airspace and bombed the Mavinga region, killing over 65 persons and leaving hundreds wounded. ._ , 91. Thus, in spite of universal repudiation and repeated condemnation by the Security Council, South Africa con- tinues to treat with contempt the territorial integrity of a sovereign State, a Member of the Organization, and uses every possible pretext to strengthen its policy of hegemony in the region. The persistence with which the Pretoria Government defies the international community and endangers the peace and security of neighbouring States inevitably recalls the policy of aggression and expansion of Israel, whose raid on‘Tunisia was unequivocally con- demned by the Council. 85. Tunisia cannot but condemn the Pretoria regime for its armed aggressions against Angola, which are irrefutable proof that Pretoria is, today as yesterday, not prepared to conform with international law. Numerous appeals have 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech, discussing a specific political issue (the occupation of Namibia by South Africa and the aggression against Angola) and condemning the actions of the South African government. The text does not mention economic, environmental, or social issues related to Namibia or Angola, but rather focuses on the political situation and the violation of international law.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief