concluded withintheframework ofaneffective nuclear disarmament process.] -23-(d)[Acomprehensive nuclear-test-ban treatyprohibiting allnuclear-testexplosions byallStatesinallenvironments foralltimeshouldbeconcluded asamatterofurgency.] Texttobeaddedattheendofrecommendation No.7 [Pending theconclusion ofsuchatrealv, thenuclear-weapon Statesarecalledupontodeclare amoratorium onallnuclear e~plosions starting fromadatetobeagreedamongallofthem.] [Pending theconclusion ofsuchatreaty, thetwomajornuclear Powerswhichconducted themostofnuclear explosions arecalled ontostop theirnuclear testsimmediately inordertofacilitate thenegotiations onacomprehensive test-ban treaty andothernuclear disarmament measures.] Recommendation No.8 [Mankind todayisconfronted withanunprecedented threatofself-extinctionarising fromthemassive andcompetitive accumulation ofthemostdestructiveweapons everproduced. Existinq arsenals ofnuclear weapons alonearemorethansufficient todestroyalllifeonearth. Yettherenewed escalation ofthenuclear-arms race,bothinitsquantitative andqualitative dimensions, aswellasreliance ondoctrines ofnuclear deterrence, hasheiqhtened theriskoftheoutbreak ofnuclear warandledtogreater insecurity andinstability ininternational relations. Nuclear weapons aremorethanweapons ofwar,theyareinstruments ofmassannihilation. Therefore, disarmament, inparticular nucleardisarmament, should nolonger beapproached justasamoralissue,butasanissueofhumansurvival.] Measures fortheprevention ofnuclear warandforthepromotion ofnucleardisarmament musttakeintoaccount thesecurity interests ofnuclear-weapon ananon-nuclear-weapon Statesalike. [TheConference onDisarmament shouldundertake,asamatterofthehighest priority, negotiations withaviewtoachievingagreement onappropriate andpractical measures fortheprevention ofnuclear war.l Recommendation No.9 [Definite normsthatwouldgoverntherelations between thePowerspossessingnuclear weapons should beagreeduponandbegivenanobligatory nature. Itisimportant thatallthenuclear Powersputthetaskofpreventing nuclear warattheapexoftheirpolicyandarrange theirmutualpolicies takingthisintoaccount.l Recommendation No.10 [Agreements should beconcluded eliminating frominternational relations theuseofforceinbothnuclear andnon-nuclear versions. Atthegloballevel,thisgoalcouldbeachieved bytheconclusion ofaworldtreatyonthenon-use offorceininternational relations. Animportant stepinthisdirection wouldbetheconclusion ofatreatyonthereciprocal non-use ofmilitary forceandthemaintenance ofrelations ofpeacebetween theWarsawTreatyandtheNATOStates,thecruxofwhichwouldbetheobligation incumbent onStatesparties ofbothgroupsnottobethefirsttouseeithernuclear ornon-nuclear weapons againsteachother.] Recommendation NO.11 [Afreezeonnuclear weaponry whichcouldbeginwiththatofthetwonuclear-weapon Statespossessing thelargest nuclear arsenals. Suchafreezewould-24-be al tr tr nu an la ra cr di st su ba be cu al efbesUbject toallrelevant measures andprocedures ofverification whichhave already beenagreed uponbytheparties inthecaseoftheSALTIandSALTII treaties, aswellasthoseagreed uponinprinciple bythemduringthepreparatory trilateral negotiations onthecomprehensive testbanheldatGeneva.] [Afreeze onthedevelopment, production, stockpiling anddeployment of nuclear weapons should beimmediately imposed, asafirststeptothereduction and,eventually, theelimination ofnuclear arsenals.] [Itisofparamount importance forthenuclear Powerswhichpossess the largest nuclear arsenals totaketheleadinhalting andreversing thenuclear-arms racebetween themandreducing drastically theirexisting nuclear arsenals soasto createpropitious conditions forallthenuclear Statestofurther adoptnuclear disarmament measures, including afreezeonthedevelopment, production, stockpiling anddeployment ofnuclear weapons.] [Negotiations should beconducted andconcluded whichwouldleadto substantial reductions innuclear weapons. Thesereductions mustbemutual, balanced andverifiable.1 [Amutually agreed, balanced andverifiable freeze onnuclear arsenals should benegotiated between thenuclear-weapon States whichshould befollowed bvdeep cutsinthosearsenals andnotbeseenasanalternative todisarmament.] Recommendation No.12 [Thefundamental approach totheprevention ofnuclear warinvolves the complete prohibition andthorough destruction ofnuclear weapons. Pending the
**Analysis**
This text appears to be discussing the topic of disarmament and the prevention of nuclear war, with a focus on international relations and the security interests of various states. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the text is likely a statement or resolution from an international organization or conference. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or other topics related to the natural environment, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture. Instead, it seems to be primarily concerned with the use of nuclear weapons and the need for disarmament.

**Category**
International relations, Science and technology