article 24 and any time-limit for applying to have a default judgement set aside, which shall be not less than three months from the date on which the copy of the judgement is received or is deemed to have been received by the State concerned, shall begin to run from that date. ” - 108 -jurisdiction. With a view to affording States better protection, that member suggested adding a separate paragraph to the effect that it was incumbent upon the judge to inquire ex into the issue of immunity under the draft articles. The suggestion was supported by several other members, one of whom futher suggested that, in view of its general nature, the proposed separate paragraph should be inserted in article 6 (original article 7). In that connection, the Special Rapporteur recalled that another member had likewise proposed the insertion of a new paragraph, reading “The court must wh determine that relevant provision had been complied with prjor to rendering judgement”, Jither in article 25 or in the commentary. The view of the Special Rapporteur was that the Drafting Committee should consider those suggestions in conjunction with article 6. 234. As regards the provisions of article 25 in general, one member stated that he could endorse the article. subject to the adoption the new subparagraph (a) which he had suggested for inclusion in paragraph 1 of article 24. Ax.blGS rmmunitv.fram_m.easures QB l.QU 235. The Special Rapporteur had no further suggestion to make with regard to ’ the article. Goverzuneuts had expressed doubts as to the appropriatoness of the provision. However, one suggested its reformulation to the effect an order itself should be prevented. The Special Rapporteur stated that he more members, uwSee paragraph 231 above. l!xi/ The text, as provisionally adopted an first reading by the Commission, read as followit
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a draft article or provision related to international law, specifically dealing with jurisdiction, immunity, and the procedure for setting aside default judgments. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a legal or juridical context. The content does not seem to be related to any specific sector or field, such as economy, health, or education.

**Category**
International law, Juridical Affairs