against the developing countries which do not possess the capability to produce such weapons. There is no doubt that the procedures for verification included in the convention will constitute its backbone and will be essential to provide the assurance that the obligations regarding the destruction of stockpiles and facilities and for the non-acquisition of chemical weapons are being complied with by all parties. It is also clear that verification will involve a combination of national and international means, and that international verification will, in certain circumstances, entail intrusive procedures to CD/PV.570 36 (Mr. Kamal. Pakistan) ensure compliance. Based on these assumptions, we have been developing a verification regime which has two key components, namely, routine inspection and challenge inspection. Even though our negotiations have not yet been concluded on these two systems of verification, and we are still not clear as to their final shape, we have witnessed a recent effort to introduce another element in the verification regime, to be now called by its authors ad hoc verification. Without repeating the arguments that one has heard in the Ad hoc Committee against the need for such a system, I would only like to point out at this juncture that this concept has also been debated in the past and its proponents have not been able to make out any convincing case for the injection of this third concept into the verification regime. We believe that the procedures presently being discussed are adequate, and that there is no need for another regime which could politicize the Technical Secretariat by giving it the right to initiate disguised challenge inspections against States parties. We hope that the proponents of this concept will accept the fact that there is, as yet, no agreement even on the need for a further detailed 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the verification process of a convention regarding chemical weapons, specifically focusing on the procedures and mechanisms to ensure compliance among states. It seems that the main concern is the potential for political manipulation and the need for a robust verification regime. Given the context and language used, it appears to be related to international relations and diplomacy.

**Category**
International trade, Science and technology