Although we all feel the new impulses and possibilities, we still draw different conclusions on how the Conference could improve its efficiency in changed conditions. In the opinion of my delegation, adjustment should not change the negotiating role of the Conference by depriving it of the right to discuss certain disarmament issues. The most important issues cannot be solved exclusively within a bilateral frame, whatever its nature, while the definition of a stable security order can be a result only of broad international co-operation. Adjustment can therefore be seen only as the strengthening of the Conference's role, the confirmation in practice of its right to deal with every basic disarmament issue. It is only in such conditions that the Conference can fully contribute to the existing dynamics of negotiations on a broader scale. It is only on such a basis that a layered and gradual approach to those questions on the agenda which are still resisting the multilateral negotiating approach will be possible and credible. This means taking into account the deliberative, pre-negotiatory and other phases, including the adoption of "intermediate" and "collateral" security-building measures, in order to promote the negotiations themselves. In order to make possible such a progressive approach, instead of a yes-or-no approach, and not reduce the role of the Conference to a kind of talking-shop, we all have to start changing and accepting the Conference in all its functions. In other words, the Conference cannot behave as if it were the only sure democratic negotiating forum, that is, as if multilateralism were the only way to authentic disarmament. But nor can it be a simple collector of left-overs from other negotiating tables. In other words, its short-term, medium-term and long-term negotiating role has to be adapted to its real possibilities, 
**Analysis**
The text discusses the role and efficiency of an international conference in the context of disarmament and security. The author emphasizes the importance of multilateral cooperation and the need for the conference to adapt to its real possibilities. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the conference is a high-level international gathering. The topic is not directly related to economic development, natural resources, or other specific sectors, but rather to international relations and diplomacy.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief