adopted rules and codlfieal practlces ln the sphere of international relations. 3. Czechoslovakia attaches great importance to tbe adoption by tbe ceneral Asseobl,y of resolutlon 39/2L0 on econotnlc meaaures as a means of political and economic coercion againEt developing countries. Czechoslova kia . a poEltion on the mentiond subject u6a expresaed in a response concerning the iopler0entatlon oE G€neral Aaseobly regolution 38lI97 (see A/39/4L51 and tn Jolnt statements by lnterested socialtat countries at the thlrty-elgtltb and thirty-ninth sesslons of lhe General AsEembly lsee A/C.2/38/8 and A/39/2291 . 4. UNCTAD re€olution I52 (vI! entitled 'Rejectlon of coercive econonic measures" and Gener.l Assembly resolutlon 38 /L97 are, ln our view, ioportant docuoents in the context of efforts to ellmlnate tbe negatlve consequences of coercive neaEures uaed agalnat developing countr les. 5. AB for paragraph 2 of c€neral AsseRbly resolutlon 39/2L0, Czechoslov€kia sp€aks out against i.tB interpretatlon, according to which it could be lncluded in tbe group of 'developed countriesn along wlth developed narket economy countrles. In thls contert, Czechoslovakla declares that it doee not uae coercive measureg fotpolltical or economlc reasons against any country or group of countrles. 6. It condemns the fact that aome develoDed countries are taklng advantaqe of in violation of the baslc prlnciples are ever more freguently using aa a means of polltical pressure on 7. The applicatlon of coerclve measures has a negatlve lmpact on the econooy of deeeloping countries End thelr efforts ln the field of development. In Eom€ casestheir leading positlon ln $orld economy and, and declslons adopted by the ttnlted llatlons,threats, coercive and reetrlctive practices Eome developlng countries.A/40/s96 Enqlish Page 44 these measures have been sharpened, which has a negattve effecE on international economic co-operatlon and the establishoent of a climate of peace and €rlenally rel-ations among states, as it is atte€ted' for instance, by the economic eobargo
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing international economic relations, specifically the adoption of resolutions and practices related to economic coercion and measures affecting developing countries. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the text is related to international organizations and treaties. The content also touches on themes of economic development, trade, and the impact of coercive measures on the economy of developing countries.

**Category**
International trade, Economic development