co arrD the whice minoEl.ty !,riEh a veto polrer Eg tbwatt and frustrate the deuand of che south Afrlcan people for an end to Apartheid and for the creatlo!l of a unlted, deuocratic and non-racia]. South AfElca. 4.6.0 By deliberately lSno!io8 the facr that the over helnlng Dajorlcy of the people of Soulh Africa - lnctudi.ng an ever grorJlng nurnber of whites - prefer, fot politLcal purposes, co define theoselves as belng primarily South Afric4lls aod only secondarily affiliated to a glven race or ethnicity, "Croup Rlghcs" and "Power Sharing" can never by deflnltlon, serve as a basls for a just and lastiog solution Eo the South Afrlcan confllct. P!etorj.ars SEaced or Implied PosLtlon on Other PrlncLples 5 .0.0 ln hls address of 2nd February 1990 to the nhlle parllanent' Mr. F,W. <le Klerk connitted hls government, to the realisation of, lnEer alLa, the following alns ,....." a new democtatic consELtution; unlv€rsal franchise; ro donLnatloni equallty befole an lndependent judlclary; the protection of mirority as well as of lndividuat rlghcs; freedom of rellglon; a sound economy based on proven economic PrinciPles and prlvate entetprlse;A/44/963 English Page8 4.4.0 Totheuniversally accepted demandoftheSouthAfrican people formajority rulethrough universal adultsuffrage basedononeperson one voteyon acommonvoters' roll,theApartheid regimecounterposes andinsists upon"PowerSharingllwhichconsists ofdividing theSouthAfrican people intoracial andethnicpolitical unitssharing political poweronthebasis ofabsolute equality between suchunits,contrary to,andindefiance of concrete demographic realities. Central tothisdispensation isthe stipulation thatdecision making onmatters thataffectallUgroups" shall bebasedonconsensus. 4.5.0 Considering thatthewhiteminority presided overthecreation andmaintenance oftheApartheid status quoandthatithasshownitself patently unwilling tovoluntarily relinguish it.IIPowerSharingltisdesigned toarmthewhiteminority withavetopowertothwart andfrustrate the demandoftheSouthAfrican peopleforanendtoApartheid andforthe creation ofaunited. democratic andnon-racial SouthAfrica. 4.6.0 Bydeliberately ignoring thefactthattheoverwhelming majority ofthepeopleofSouthAfrica -including anevergrowing number ofwhites - prefer? forpolitical purposes, todefine themselves asbeing prim~rily South Africans andonlysecondarily affiliated toagivenraceorethnicity? HGroup RightsllandlIPowerSharingllcanneverbydefinition, serveasabasisfora justandlasting solution totheSouthAfrican conflict. Pretoria's StatedorImplied Position onOtherPrinciples 5.0.0 Inhisaddress of2ndFebruary 1990tothewhiteparliament, Mr.F.W.deKlerkcomm{tted hisgovernment, totherealisation of,inter
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a political document discussing the South African Apartheid regime and its policies, specifically focusing on the concept of "Power Sharing" and its implications for the country's future. The text highlights the regime's attempts to maintain its power and control over the country, while also discussing the demands of the South African people for an end to Apartheid and the creation of a united, democratic, and non-racial society.

**Category**
Politics, Humanitarian aid and relief