. . 40.3 15.7 12.3 . . 10.4 2.5 18.7 .,, . . . . . . . 100.0 32.5 15.6 24.9 14.4 9.0 2.5 1.1 100.0 89.2 6.6 100 .o 40.6 19.5 20.8 1.9 14.4 0.0 1.8 0.4 0.6 100 .o 36.4 22.0 30.2 0.1 11.2 0.2 0.0 100 .o . . 28.8 20.9 27.8 . . 18.151 . . .a. 2.0 0.8 1.7 100 .o Eueden . . 33.4 14.2 34.7 ., 9.2 3.9 Inited States 1.9 bl 23.3 28.7 26.4 2.9 3.6 10.0 E/ 'phis figure applies to co~ms 6 and 7 jointly. k/ Partial data only. . . .a 0.6 100.0 . . 2.6 2.5 0.1 0.5 0.1 100.0 / *.. Australia Austria Belgium Canade France Germeny, Fea. Fiep. of Indonesia ICaly Mexico Netherlande New Zealand NOrWW Sveden United States Te.ble 13. Percentage distribution of military expenditures by resource coets Operating costs Operationa ana rsonnel maintennnce Tota.l. Racurement and Research and conatruction development Procurement Conotruction Total 50.4 26.2 76.6 16.7 3.6 20.3 47.9 20.2 68.1. 23.6 0.3 31.8 55.4 19.5 74.8 18.7 6.4 25.1 55.1 28.7 03.8 12.9 2.5 15.4 36.8 27.1 63.9 18.8 4.3 23.1 41.4 28.2 69,6 19.0 7.0 26.0 47*9 27.7 76.6 14.0 7.8 23.3 49.0 23.9 72.9 24.0 1.8 25.8 78.0 13.8 91.8 2.4 1.4 8.0 56.7 19.4 76.1 19.6 3.4 23.0 59.4 29.3 88.7 7.4 3.1 10.5 45.7 27.4 73.1 21.0 5.1 26.1 40.4 19.2 59.6 29.3 5.6 34.8 48.8 20.3 69.1 20.2 1.8 22.0 Research Development Tota 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.8 0.8 1.5 4.0 5.6 8.3 Totsl milti expenditu --35- 96. The above tables should be regarded as examples of such analytical calculations as could be made on the basis of the supplied data. The reader is gzeferred fo,r. further study:to annexes 1 ar+d,,IV containing the data as received f"from the participating countries. =.( . D. Revised and recommended reportinp instrument ew-..2 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a statistical report on military expenditures by countries, with data on operating costs, personnel, maintenance, procurement, and research and development. The report seems to be focused on the allocation of resources and the distribution of military expenditures among different categories.

**Category**
Industry, International trade