84. Mr. Maxim. havins been drawn by lot by the Chairman· was called upon to vote first. In favour: Mr. Despouy, Mr. Eide, Mr. Joinet, Mr. Maxim, Mr. Suesc6n Monroy, Mrs. Warzazi. Asainst: Mr. Alfonso Martinez, Mrs. Attah, Mrs. Bautista, Mr. Guisse, Mr. Hatano, Mr. Heller, Mr. Ilkahanaf, Mr. Khalil, Mrs. Ksentini, Mrs. Palley, Mr. Saboia, Mr. Sachar, Mr. Tian Jin, Mr. Treat. Abstainins: Mr. van Boven, Mr. Chernichenko, Mrs. Daes, Mr. Yimer. 85. The proposal by Mr. Despouy was rejected by 14 votes to 6. with 4 abstentions. 86. Mr. ILKABANAF said that since there was no consensus or general agreement, to close the debate would have served no purpose. The meeting rose at 6.10 p.m. 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a record of a meeting or vote within an international organization, likely a human rights or humanitarian organization. The language used is formal and technical, and the participants' names are of diverse backgrounds, suggesting a global setting. The topic of the vote is not explicitly stated, but the use of phrases like "rejected by 14 votes to 6" implies a formal decision-making process. Given the context, it is likely that the topic is related to human rights, international law, or humanitarian affairs.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International relations