once again, unfortunately, that it is far from heeding the report of the Secretary-General or reflecting the de- cisive stage reached in the process of seeking a final solution to the problem of Cyprus. Like the previous resolution [resofulion 553 (1984)], this one not only refers-in the fourth preambular paragraph-to pro- visions which the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus and Turkey have never accepted but prolongs a mandate which has been made almost archaic by rad- ical changes that have occurred in the mean time+ 100. Furthermore, we have a fundamental objection to that resolution. It is based on a supposed authoriza- tion from a self-styled governmental entity that has had no genuine or juridical existence since December 1963. This entity, the so-called Government of Cyprus, has in the course of the last 21 years never been the bi-com- munal Government established in 1960 jointly by the Greek and Turkish Cypriots in accordance with the Constitution negotiated at that time, which provided for the participation of both communities in State bodies and functions within a bi-communal State-in other words, the State system of the Republic of Cyprus, based on equal association of the two sovereign com- munities of the island, which jointly exercised their right to self-determination by mutually consenting to the creation under an international treaty of the Re- public of Cyprus on the basis of the unalterable Basic Articles of its Constitution. 101. There can be no doubt that the agreement to be concluded at the high-level meeting and its implemenla- tion as a result of direct negotiations between the two communities will require the allocation of new respon- sibilities to UNFICYP. Those responsibilities will flow directly from the agreement we hope the two commu- nities will conclude by 17 January of next year. 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing a political conflict between the Greek and Turkish Cypriots, specifically the status of Cyprus and the role of the United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus (UNFICYP). The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level or official document. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or social issues, but rather focuses on the political process and negotiations between the two communities.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief