as a result of this senseless act of aggression perpetrated by Israel deserve our respect. Let us not wait for Israel to run out of arguments: obviously it will always have arguments. 43. Today, the least that can be expected of the Security Council is that it condemn Israel unanimously and vigour- ously for its premeditated armed aggression against Tuni- sia and demand that Israel offer appropriate reparations for the loss of human life and material damage resulting from the aggression. 44. The Council has an overriding obligation to come to the assistance of the Palestinian people, which Israel has pitilessly hounded in an effort to prevent it from liberating its occupied homeland. The Council must also find ways and means to deter Israel from perpetrating reprehensible acts of the kind it perpetrated yesterday against Tunisia. 51. The Council definitely recognizes Israel’s record in the Organization, and in the Council in particular, where the right of veto has been placed at the service of Israel. 52. The statement of the Israeli representative before the 45. The PRESIDENT: The next speaker is Mr. Adnan Omran, Under-Secretary-General for Political and Inter- national Affairs of the League of Arab States, to whom the Council extended an invitation under rule 39 of its provi- Council yesterday showed that the Israelis are unmoved by bloodshed and the death of innocent victims. It also showed Israel’s contempt for the will of the Council and its role of upholding peace. The statement of the Zionist rep- resentative contained new evidence of Israel’s defiance of the will of the international community. It also proved 5 sional rules of nrocedure at the 2611th meeting. I invite him to take a place at the Council table and to-make his statement. 46. Mr. OMRAN (interpretation from Arabic): Allow me, Sir, to associate myself with those who have congratulated 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or resolution related to a conflict between Israel and Tunisia, discussing the actions of Israel as an act of aggression and calling for condemnation and reparations. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a high-level discussion or debate.

**Category**
International trade, Humanitarian aid and relief