21. In a way, we understand their dilemma. The Pretoria racists, like their racist predecessors throughout history, are incurable victims of their own subjective conditioning based on an outrageous concept of human relations, not being able to see anything else except a master-servant relationship between different races. Botha and his hench- men are convinced until death that they know best what is good for Africa. They are also convinced that they are innocent victims of imaginary evil forces, at whose bidding Angola and, by extension, SWAP0 are acting. In other words, the embattled Angolans, the oppressed Namibians and South Africans, the peaceful peoples of Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Zambia, Lesotho, Swaziland, Sey- chelles and other African States are considered by them as perpetrators of certain crimes against the Boer regime. 22. We do not feel any empathy for the racists. They will certainly perish by their own sword if they refuse to adapt to the demands of the majority. Time is fast running out, and the African majority has virtually no more patience to spare. Blood is flowing. The vexing question is, how many rivers will it fill and in the end, how many people will have died? 23. During the earlier debates on Angola on 20 Septem- ber, and again at the beginning of this debate, Botha’s messenger expressed in the Council the view that “The United States Congress, by repealing the Clark Amend- ment, has already recognized the admissibility of aiding UNITA.” [2612th meeting, para. 31.1 24. Are the Boers shooting in the dark, or are they letting the cat out of the bag? We know the history of the Clark Amendment and the widely reported imperialist conspi- racy aimed at denying the Angolan people the fruits of their revolution. We have also learned from some offtcial United States State Department documents that have been 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a political commentary on the situation in South Africa, particularly the apartheid regime and its treatment of African countries. The language used is confrontational and accusatory, with a focus on the racist ideology of the Pretoria government and its leaders. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, or other economic-related topics, nor does it discuss education, health, employment, or humanitarian aid. Instead, it seems to be focused on the political and ideological aspects of the conflict.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International relations