UNITED NATIONS s Security Council Distr . GENERAL S/17481 20 September 1985 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Burkina Faso, Egypt, India, Madagascar, Peru and Trinidad and Tobago: draft resolution The Security Council, Havinq considered the request by the Permanent Representative of Angola to the United Nations contained in document S/17474, Havin9 heard the statement of the Permanent Representative of the People’s Republic of Anqola to the United Nations, Recalling its resolutions 387 (1976) of 31 March 1976, 428 (1978) of 6 May 1978, 447 (1979) of 28 March 1979, 454 (1979) of 2 November 1979, 475 (1980) of 27 June 1980, 545 (1983) of 20 December 1983, 567 (1985) of 20 June 1985, which, inter alia, condemned South Africa’s aggression against the People’s Republic of Anqola and demanded that South Africa scrupulously respect the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the People’s Republic of Anqola, Gravely concerned at the further renewed escalation of hostile, unprovoked and persistent acts oE aqgression and sustained armed invasions committed by the racist rigime of South Africa, in violation of the sovereignty, airspace and territorial inteqrity of the People’s Republic of Anqola, Convinced that the intensity and timing of these acts of armed invasions are intended to frustrate efforts at negotiated settlements in southern Africa, particularly in regard to the implementation of Security Council resolutions 385 (1976) and 435 (1978), Grieved at the traqic loss of human life, mainly that of civilians and concerned about the damage and destruction of pcoperty including bridges and livestock resulting from the escalated acts of aggression and armed incursions by the racist r&ime of South Africa aqainst the People’s Republic of Angola, Gravely concerned that these wanton acts of aggression by South Africa form a consistent and sustained pattern of violations and are aimed at weakening the 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a draft resolution submitted to the United Nations Security Council, condemning the aggression of South Africa against Angola. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on the violation of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and human life. The text also mentions specific resolutions and agreements, indicating a strong international relations and politics focus.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief