65. In the opinion of another member, a person should be held individually responsible for committing a crime under the Code if that person carried out an aat which violated any of the provisions of the Code. There would be collective responsibility, apart from individual responsibility, when an individual aonapired with others to commit an ilLaqa1 act contrary to the Code, and when the perpetration of that act could be attributed both to a legal entity and to e&ah of the individuals having partiaipated in the decision-taking process or in the execution of the decision to commit an act in violation of the Code. The nature of the arime was of great importance for determining the type of criminal teaponsibility involved, Certain crimes such as aggression, genocide and w~thaid could not be perpotratod By an individual1 they required a group of participants or a collective participation. The tendency to broaden the field of application of collective responsibility for crimes against the peace and security of mankind was justified in his opinion. He proposed that conspirscy should be defined as the offence of two or more persons who decided to execute jointly a common plan aimed at committing any crime under the Code, and that the definition should specify that each of the offenders was guilty of conspiracy to commit that crime, In his view, such a definition would bring out more clearly the dual responsibility -individual and collective - involved in conspiracy, as conceived by the Special Rapporteur. 66. Referring to certain questions raised in the course of the discussion, the Special Rapporteur pointed out that conspiracy differed from complicity in that, in the case of conspiracy , no distinction was made betwsen direct perpetrators and indirect perpetrators, perpetrators and co-perpetrators, or perpotra?.ora and accomplices -all the participants were associated in the
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing legal concepts and principles related to criminal responsibility, particularly in the context of international law. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on legal and political issues. The text references specific crimes, such as aggression, genocide, and war crimes, which are typically addressed in the context of international humanitarian law and human rights.

**Category**
International law, Humanitarian law