Having heard the statements of the representatives of Senegal and Portugal conceming violations of Sene­ galese territory by the Portuguese military forces, 1. Deep/y deplores any incursions by Portuguese military forces into Senegalese terri tory; 2. Reaffirms its resolution 178 (1963) of 24 April 1963; 3. Requests once again the Government of Portugal to take all effective and necessary action to prevent any violation of Senegal's sovereignty and territorial inte­ grity; 4. Requests the Secretary-General to follow the development of the situation. Adopted unanlmously at the 1212th meeting. THE INDIA-PAKISTAN QUESTION 31 Declsion At its 1237th meeting, on 4 September 1965, the Council decided to invite the representatives of India and Pakistan to participate, without vote, in the discussion of the question. Resolution 209 (1965) or 4 September 1965 The Security Council, Noting the report of the Secretary-General of 3 Sep­ tember 1965,32 Having heard the statements of the representatives of India and Pakistan, Concerned at the deteriorating situation along the cease-fire line in Kashmir, 1. Calls upon the Govemments of India and Pakistan to take forthwith all steps for an immediate cease-fire; 2. Calls upon the two Govemments to respect the cease-fire line and have all armed personnel of each party withdrawn to its own side of the line; 31 Resolutions or decisions on this question were also adopted by the Council in 1948, 1949, 1950, 1951, 1952, 1957, 1962 and 1964. 32 Official Records of the Security Council, Twentkth Year, Supplement for July, August and September 1965, document S/6651. Ayant entendu les déclarations des· représentants du Sénégal et du Portugal concernant les violations par les forces militaires portugaises du territoire sénégalais, 1. Déplore profondément toutes incursions de forces militaires portugaises sur le territoire sénégalais; 2. Réaffirme sa résolution 178 (1963) du 24 avril 1963; 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a United Nations Security Council resolution, addressing specific conflicts and territorial violations between Senegal and Portugal, as well as the India-Pakistan question. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on sovereignty, territorial integrity, and ceasefires. Given the content and tone, it seems likely that the resolution is related to international relations, diplomacy, and conflict resolution.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief