instrument fortheexecution ofitsMembers' willtoendsuchviolations? Dothedisasters inflicted onthepeopleofLebanon andPalestine duringthe lasttwelvemonthsnotmakeafundamental changeintheperformance oftheAW/ljb A/40/PV.20 67 I (Mr.Velayati, Islamic Republic ofIran) unitedNations anecessity? Dothebloodstained roadsandby-roads ofLebanese villages pointtoanything butthe'inaction ofinternational organizations, especially theunitedNations? Doesthespiltbloodoftheinnocent Lebanese peoplenotcryoutfortheconviction ofthoseregimes intheregionwhose compromised positions wererevealed intheso-called Jordan-Palestinian proposal? Arethestatements madeintheAssembly bycertain headsofStatespromoting the infamous policyof"compromise andcapitulate" totheusurper Zionist regime, not intended toburj'thecauseofthePalestinian peopleforever? Wedeclare herethatthetreacherous efforts bytheAmman-Baghdad-Cairo axis forrecognition andlegitimization oftheusurper Zionist regimearedoomedto failure. Weareconvinc\~d thattheIslamic~willintimeconfront this aggressor andrestoreitsstolenrightsinPalestine, theGolanHeights, theGaza Strip,theWestBanlt,theLebanon, EgyptandnowTunisia. Thelatestraidon' Tunisia bythelatter-day Nazisoccupying Palestine, whichwascarried outin complete harmony withtheUnitedStates, servesasanother reminder tocertain reactionary, compromising elements inourregion,thatretreating beforean aggressive enemywillonlymakeitmoreviolent. Itdemonstrated onceagainthat theZionist regimeknowsnolimitsforitsaggressions andthatallAraband Islamic countries arepotential targets forthefutureinvasions ofthissatanic regime. Inotherwords,thislatestactofaggression istheproper rewardfor thosewhoa\tthisveryrostrum uselessly praised theIsraeli andAmerican regimes. TheMuslims ofPalestine, havinglearnedthislessonwhole-heartedly, continue their stru~Jgle toregaintheirusurped rights, andnoplotsmayweakentheir resolve fortheliberation ofPalestine anddriving thebigPowersoutoftheir homeland.AW/ljb A/40/PV ..20 .-68 (Mr.Velayati, Islamic Republic ofIra~) Inreviewing therecordoftheUnitedNations anditsaffiliated organs, we so~times comeacrosscertain encouraging signs, s\~hastheverdict ofthe rnte~national Cuuc~of~u5ticeattheHagueonAmerican aggression against Nicaragua. Thevalueofthisdecision ismoreclearly recognized whenweseethe UnitedStates decla~ing thattherulingwasoutside thejurisdiction ofthis universally ~ecognized international court. Suchequitable decisions byUnited Nations orgitnsshouldbestrongly supported andhelpedtobecomedominant inthe Organization. Otherwise aggression against independent countries andintervention intheiraffairs, andimposition ofillegal jurisdiction, suchastheso-called mobilesovereignty inthePersian Gulfandotherareasgranted totheUnitedStates fleetbytheUnitedStatespirateGovernment itself,willcontinue unabated. The UnitedStatesisalsointervening intheinternal affairs ofNicaragua and El.Salvador andcontinuously triestoexpanditshegemony overLatinAmerican countries inpolitical, military, andeconomic matters. Itiswithregretthatwehavetomention othersensitive issuesreceiving similar treatment bythesuper-Powers intheUnitedNations. Theongoing talkson Afghanistan isonesuchissue. Fiveyearshavepassedsincetalkscommenced undertheauspices oftheUnited Nations aimedatendingtheoccupation ofAfghanistan. Duetocertain reasons, however, thereseemstobenotangible changeintheposition oftheoccupying party. Thisiswhatthersiamic Republic ofIranpredicted fromthevery beginning, knowing thattheabsence ofthetruerepresentatives oftheAfghan peopleandtheconditions setbytheoccupying forcesforimmediate withdrawal, had doomedtheentireexercise tofailure. ButtheunitedNations, whichalready had theexperience ofdealing withsimilar issuesfornearly40years,hasnotpaidAW/ljb A/40/Pv.'20 69-70 (Mt.Velayati, Islamic Republic ofIran) dueattention tothesetwonegative factors inthesetalks. Thus,wemayask,what isnowthejustification forthecontinuation ofthetalks? Havethesetalksresulted inanything butentertainment forworldpublic opinion anddivertifig itfromtheoriginal question whichwassupposed tobethe unjustified continuation oftheoccupation ofAfghanistan? Thisproblem canbe solvedonlythrough theunconditional and;btmediate withdrawal oftheoccupation forces, non-replacement ofthesetroopsbyutherimperialist forces, voluntary returnofallAfghanrefugees totheirhomeland, respectforAfghannational
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a political speech or statement, discussing international relations, conflicts, and the role of the United Nations. It mentions specific countries and regions, such as Lebanon, Palestine, Iran, the United States, and Afghanistan, and references historical events and agreements. The language used is inflammatory and accusatory, suggesting a strong political or ideological stance.

**Category**
International relations, Politics