Whereas, in the "first case", the Respondent's principa l contentions are: 1.Failure by the Organization to issue a P.35 form , immediately upon, or shortly after, the summary dismissal of th e Applicant in an attempt to recover misappropriated funds, does no t entitle the Applicant to damages. 2.The Applicant's conduct bars any entitlement that may hav e- 16 - existed to payment of interest on account of failure to prom ptly issue a P.35 form. 3.Retention of the Applicant's n ame in computerized payroll records subsequent to the date of his summary dismissal does no t entitle the Applicant to pay and allowances for that period. 4.Award of profit costs should b e limited to cases where an Applicant is represented by a person entitled to practice law fo r reward. Whereas, in the "second case", the Respondent's principa l contentions are: 1.The U.N. Charter and the Staff Regulations oblige th e Secretary- General to select and retain staff of the highest standards of integrity and, therefore, h e has the responsibility of determining definitively whether a staff member meets that standard. 2.The summary dismissal of the Applicant was preceded b y ample opportunity for him to state his case and the actual decisio n was not improperly motivated. The Tribunal, having deliberat ed from 27 April to 18 May 1990, now pronounces the following judgement: I.Two appeals by the Applicant are before the Tribunal. Cas e No. 511 involves the Applicant's summary dismissal for seriou s misconduct. Case No. 497 involves alleged wrong-doing by th e Administration with respect to delaying access by the Applic ant to his Pension Fund account following his termination. The two appeals are therefore related and the Respondent has requested that they be joined and considered together by the Tribunal. The Tribunal consider s
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a legal document, specifically a judgment or ruling from an international organization, likely the United Nations. The language used is formal and technical, indicating a focus on legal procedures and principles. The content of the judgment relates to the employment and dismissal of a staff member, which suggests a connection to the category of Employment.

**Category**
Employment