to continue to mock with impunity the Charter of the United Nations and the principles and norms of its system of international law. 72. On 18 April last, the racist South African rCgime established an “interim government” in order to ensure that Namibia would continue to be dependent on and controlled by that rkgime. That attempt to mock the will of the Namibian people and the support of the international community for its struggle and that of its vanguard, SWAPO, for the total independence of that people demon- strates once again that South Africa is not willing to end the subjugation of Namibia. In fact what the South African rCgime fears is that if the Namibian people were given the opportunity freely to express themselves on their choice of leaders they would choose SWAPO-something that would permanently eradicate apartheid and colonialism from Namibia, 73. As occurs in neo-colonialist systems, the unilateral measures promoted by South Africa in Namibia have as their aim strengthening and institutionalizing the hateful rtgime of apartheid. These attempts and their real objec- tives cannot but lead the international community to the unavoidable conclusion that the so-called interim govern- ment and the much vaunted constructive engagement are no more than delaying tactics to continue to deny the rights of the Namibian people and to convert the international community into an accomplice of the goals of the racist rCgime of Pretoria and its allies. The Council should emphatically, clearly and firmly condemn those hypocriti- cal attempts by those who uphold apartheid within and outside South Africa. 8 74. These facts and the new military offensive, which has been described as an “iron fist” policy, embarked upon by South Africa in northern Namibia and the massive South African military mobilizations in southern Angola-a Ter- ritory illegally occupied by South Africa-are factors that 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a political statement or a document from an international organization, criticizing the actions of the South African government and its treatment of Namibia. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international law, human rights, and the principles of the United Nations. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or cultural issues, but rather addresses the political situation and the rights of the Namibian people.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International trade