comprehensive negotiations on the question, lrithout pre-conditions or predetermineddates, within a framework governed by the principle of good faieh rrhich must preva i I in international relations. The democratic Argentine Government reiterates once again its plealge that theinteresls of the inhabitant.s of the fstands must be taken care of during lhenegotiations, to \^'hich end it is prepared to guarantee their traditions, lifestyle and customs and grant the necessary safeguards. There i.s thus no remaining justification for the United Kingdom's conductother than the attempt to perpetuate an anachronistic and i.llegal coloniatsituation, ignoring United Nations mandates appli.cable to Che situation. We must none the less emphasize yet again that the passage of time will not weaken the reso!-ve underlying Argentina's craim. nor its conviction as to the needto seecLe peacefully a dispute r.rhich is preventing the nornalization of relations belween the trro na tions.
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a statement from the Argentine government regarding a territorial dispute with the United Kingdom. The language used suggests that the issue is not about economic or commercial interests, but rather about the sovereignty and rights of the inhabitants of the disputed territories. The emphasis on "traditions, lifestyle and customs" and the need to "guarantee their safeguards" suggests that the issue is more related to cultural and territorial identity rather than economic or environmental concerns.

**Category**
International relations, Culture