wise not to reclassify the post to the P-5 level on a permanent basis in case the next person to occupy it proved to be a P-3. He therefore supported the Advisory Committee's recommendation. 6. Mr. PINHEIRQ-GUIMARAES (Brazil) expressed his delegation's support for the Egyptian proposal. 7. Mr. MURRAY (United Kingdom) said that the Fifth Committee should base its decisions concerning the grading of posts on an objective analysis of the requirements and functions involved, bearing in mind the element of flexibility in the selection of a special assistant to which the Canadian representative had referred. His delegation was not happy with the proposal made by the Egyptian representative, and preferred to remain with the Advisory Committee's recommendations. 8. Mr. TAKASU (Japan) expressed his delegation's support for the Advisory Committee's judgement. 9. He was perplexed by the statement in paragraph 28.25 of the Advisory Committee's report to the effect that the estimate for travel of staff included a resource growth of $79,200 attributable to travel by the members of the Staff Management Co-ordination Committee (SMCC) and that savings would result in respect of the 1982-1983 appropriation for staff travel. Table 28C.4 in the proposed programme budget showed no reduction in any item of expenditure other than temporary posts and temporary assistance. His delegation's policy was to support the Advisory Committee as far as possible, but he hoped that the Advisory Committee would take the opportunity to consider the matter in a broader context. 10. Miss ZONICLE (Bahamas) said that to reject the reclassifications requested in section 28C would be an act of discrimination, since reclassification proposals in other parts of the budget had been accepted without query. Her delegation could not condone such an attack on the already weak career development system in the 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be discussing administrative matters related to the United Nations, specifically the grading of posts and reclassification of positions. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting that the topic is related to organizational management and human resources.

**Category**
Administration, Employment