people who rose up in the struggle for reunification shouting "go to the north, come to the south, let's meet in Panmunjom", at the beginning of the 1960s. Under the very manipulation of the United States, the south Korean authorities brought to rupture the hard-won north-soath dialogue at the beginning of the 1970s and openly proclaimed to the world their policy of "two Koreas", and at the beginning of the 1980s, responded to the south Korean people aspiring after democracy and reunification with atrocious mass slaughter and committed the crime of stamping out the growing spirit of national reunification. The United States has not only blocked the way to national reunification in south Korea but also mocked at the fate and future of our nation at random, Prattling about "admission to the United Nations" and "cross-recognition" in an attempt to legalize Korea's division internationally. The 40-year history since the occupation of south Korea by the United States troops is the history of crimes of turning south Korea into a ·complete colony, military base and imposing the calamities of war and division upon our nation, and cursed sin-filled history which recorded the disgraceful chapter in the mode~n imperialist history of aggression. All the facts bespeak that the United States troops' occupation of south Korea is the very root cause of the deteriorating tension in the Korean peninsula and the stumbling-block to the reunification of Korea. Nevertheless, the United States is loud-mouthed about the fictitious "threat of south-ward invasion" and "military superiority of the north" and trumpets as if the United States troops present in south Korea "serve" tor "security" in the Korean peninsula and world "equilibrium of armed forces". It is nobody's secret that the "threat of south-ward invasion" the United States is uttering as its favourite term is, in tact, no more than an artifice to 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a political statement or speech, criticizing the United States' role in the division of Korea and the occupation of South Korea. It highlights the historical events and conflicts that have led to the current situation, and emphasizes the need for reunification. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting a strong emotional investment in the topic.

**Category**
Politics, International Relations