107. It was in that context that the Coordinating Bureau of Non-Aligned Countries, meeting at New Delhi from 19 to 21 April 1985, considered that it would be useful for the Council to be convened so that it could fully discharge its responsibilities for the implementation of resolution 435 (1978). 108. These meetings of the Council present an excep- tional opportunity for us to live up to our commitments to the ideals, purposes and principles of the Charter and our international responsibilities in this year of the fortieth anniversary of the United Nations and the twenty-fifth anniversary of the adoption of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples. 109. Angola hopes that this time the Council will justify the confidence placed in it by the international community as the organ whose primary responsibility is the mainte- nance of international peace and security and will demand the immediate implementation by South Africa of the United Nations plan for the independence of Namibia. If South Africa persists in its attitude of arrogance, intransi- gence and obstructionism, the Security Council may envis- age the adoption of appropriate measures in accordance with Chapter VII of the Charter, which provides an abun- dance of means of isolating and eliminating the odious system of apartheid. 110. The statement made on 10 June by the representa- tive of South Africa in the Council constitutes in itself an affront to the conscience of mankind and a further act of defiance of the authority of the United Nations, where respect for the sovere’iinty of States and non-interference in the interiial affairs of States are fundamental principles. The coarse language of that statement suggests to us that South Africa wishes to perpetuate its criminal policy of aggression and destabilization against Angola. That is why 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech delivered by Angola's representative to the United Nations, addressing the issue of South Africa's non-compliance with UN resolutions regarding the independence of Namibia. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with no mention of economic development, natural resources, or environmental issues. The focus is on international relations, politics, and security.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief