resolution 2065 (XXI by an overwhelming majoI%y. In that resolution. the Assembly. first. took note of the existence of a dispute between the Governmenls of Argentina and the United Kingdom concerning sovereignty over the Malvinas, and, secondly, invited both countries to pursue negotiations so as to find a peaceful solution to the problem, bearing in mind the provisions and objectives of the Charter of the United Nations and of General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV). as well as the interests of the population of the islands. 40. The General Assembly reiterated its position ill four consensuses reached in 1966, 1967. 1969 and 1971. urging the parties to pursue negotiations in accordance with the course and scope adopted in resolution 2065 (XX). 41. General Assembly resolution 3160 (XXVIII) reaffirmed the same premises and stated that the way to put an end to the colonial situation was by the peace- ful solution of the conflict of sovereignty between Argentina and the United Kingdom: it urged the parties to pursue negotiations without delay. 4 42. As can be seen. once again the existence of a dispute relating to sovereignty between the two coun- tries concerning the archipelagos was recognized and it was noted that the only valid interlocutors to settle this were the two Governments. 43. It is extremely important to emphasize that the terms used in those resolutions were not chance terms: rather. they were the outcome of a well-founded judgement reached by the General Assembly, which WHS thus explicitly recognizing that, in the case of the Malvinas Islands, the principle that enshrines and protects the right of States to territorial integrity is applicable. It could not be otherwise, since the ille- gitimate act of force by Great Britain was followed by the expulsion of the original population of the terri- tory-Argentine nationals-and their replacement by 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic document discussing a territorial dispute between Argentina and the United Kingdom over the Malvinas Islands. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to United Nations resolutions and international law. The focus is on the sovereignty of the islands and the need for a peaceful solution to the conflict. This suggests that the text is more related to international politics and diplomacy rather than economic or social issues.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief