The Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America, which was opened for signature at Tlatelolco, Mexico, in February 1967, was welcomed by the General Assembly at its twenty-second session. The Assembly then recommended States that were or might become signatories of the Treaty and those contemplated in Additional Protocol I of the Treaty to strive to take all measures within their power to ensure that the Treaty speedily obtained the widest possible application among them (resolution 2266 OfXII)). The present item was included in the agenda of the twenty-ninth session of the General Assembly, in 1974, at the request of 16 Latin American States (A/9692). At that session, the Assembly noted with satisfaction that the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Netherlands had deposited their instruments of ratification of Additional Protocol I and urged the other two States that under the Treaty might become parties to the Additional Protocol to sign and ratify it as soon as possible (resolution 3262 (XXIX)). At its thirtieth session, the General Assembly again urged France and the United States of America to sign and ratify Additional Protocol I of the Treaty as soon as possible (resolution 3473 (XXX)). At its thirty-second session, the General Assembly noted with satisfaction that Additional Protocol I of the Treaty had been signed on 26 May 1977 by the United States and again urged France to sign and ratify that Protocol as soon as possible (resolution 32/76). At its tenth special session, in 1978, the General Assembly expressed the view that it was desirable that the States entitled to become parties to the Additional Protocols of the Treaty that had not yet done so should sign and ratify those instruments (resolution S-1012, para. 63 (b)). At its thirty-third session, the General Assembly again invited France and the 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a historical record of a treaty related to nuclear disarmament and its implementation. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a international agreement or treaty. The text mentions specific countries, dates, and resolutions, which further supports this hypothesis.

**Category**
International trade, Humanitarian aid and relief