shooting and killing of the guard. They were present at the attack on the Moraka police station with others. Thejudge, on page 896ofthe record, said that "it will be remembered that at Moraka, a lady was standing enjoying the night air, talking to her husb~nd who was t~e watch on the gate. People came along, these terrorists, and cut him down before her eyes, while his hands were in the air". Thus there is no finding by the judge that the accused did what is stated in the letter and to which we have referred above. The letter states further that "a membr of the public, Mr. Sam Salatil Sangwene, while in the process of getting out of his motor car, was also shot and wounded". If this is intended to suggest that he was shot and wounded by the accused, this is also incorrect. The evidence of the woman to which we have referred above is to the effect that this man came along while the shooting was in progress and she saw him fall. She had heard a shot. The evidence of Mr. Mogoerane is that the man was not shot bu_t that ~ ha_nd grenade exploded and that injured the man. l here 1s nothmg m the con­ fessions of the accused or admissions made by the accused to the effect that any of the accused shot the man. On page 896 of the record, the judge stated that "in that very attack, _there was a m~~ who got out of his car: he was a member of the public. He was shot . The Court does not give a finding to the effect that any one of the accused did the shooting. The letter states further that "in addition, the accused fired ran­
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a legal document, specifically a court transcript or a judgment, discussing the events surrounding the shooting and killing of a guard and the wounding of a member of the public during an attack on a police station. The language used is formal and objective, and the content focuses on the facts of the case rather than any broader social or economic issues.

**Category**
Law and Justice