Troyanovsky of the Soviet Union. 53. This is the second time in three months that the, Council has met at the request ‘of the Government of the People’s Republic of Angola as a result of South African aggression. 54. On 20 June, the Council was informed by the Minis- ter for Foreign Affairs of Angola of the aggression com- mitted against Angola by South African insurgent forces. Despite the overwhelming condemnation by the intema- tional community of the racist regime of South Africa for its acts of aggression and destabilization against ‘the non- aligned neighbouring country of Angola, the Pretoria regime has paid no heed, instead, it is once again involved, as was lucidly described this morning by the representative of Angola, in a new escalation of aggression against his country-this time with the excuse’that it is defending itself from attacks by forces of SWAPO. 55. The South African regime, which maintains the larg- est and by far the best equipped military force in southern Africa, launches massive ground and air strikes against Angola, expecting the world to believe that that is done in self-defence. 56.. The contempt of the Pretoria regime for the interna- tional community and international law is well known, and has been condemned repeatedly by this body. 57. The termination of South Africa’s Mandate over Na- mibia and the establishment of the United Nations Council for Namibia as the legal Administering Authority of the Territory until-independence make South Africa’s oppres- sive presence in the Territory illegal. 58. The fact that South Africa uses the Territory of Na- mibia as a springboard for military operations and other subversive acts against neighbouring States adds another dimension to its disrespect for international law and its contempt.for the international community. By intensifying its aggression against the front-line and neighbouring 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a political statement or a resolution made by the United Nations, condemning the aggression of South Africa against Angola and Namibia. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with a focus on international law, the international community, and the actions of the South African government. The text does not mention any specific economic, social, or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the political situation and the violation of international law.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief