financial losses, might also suffer damage in respect of its honour and dignity and that a remedy should be provided for the latter damage, The views differed, however, as to the content of material or moral injury, namely what types of injuries should be considered “material” or “moral” damage and hence covered by the articles. The viaws also differed as reqards the forms of remedy that were most appropriate for these various types of damage. For example, while some members were not certain that. “moral” damage to agents OK a State was independent of the “moral” damage to the State itself, as the - 183 -Special Rapporteur had suggested, some others agreed with the Special Rapporteur on that issue. The analysis of views on various forms of dsmage as it relates to the forms of remec¶y is covered below under the sections dealing with articles 8, 9 and 10. 329. As regards the use of the expression “moral” damage, a few members preferred the expression “non-material” damage, which, in their view, more appropriately corresponded to the type of F8SpOnsibility a State would incur, namely non-material and (according to some writers) political responsibility. The expression “non-material” damage, in their view, also avoided unneceesary theoretical discussions about whether a State as a collective entity was capable of having “moral” attitudes -attitudes which, in most legal systems, were attributed to human beings only. 330. The Special R0ppOrteuF stated that in the area of primary rules, such as maritime delimitation, trade and economic relations, the uses of watercourses etc., conflicts of interest between groups of States (coastal and land-locked, ROOF and rich, upstream OF downstream etc.) were clear and Father well-defined. In his view, that was not as much the case with secondary rules. Any State might any day be either an author State OF an injured
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing international law and the concept of damage caused to a state, including both material and non-material/moral damage. The language used is technical and legal, with references to specific articles and the work of a Special Rapporteur. The content does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.

**Category**
International Law