situation? That %ppLies to Turkey. tate in the intervention of the representative of Turkey we heard quite a lot of reference3 to guidelines and p%raqraphs of resolution 649 (1990). It was this very 86119 Security council that tmk that decision8 resolution 649 (1990) was adopted unanfrxxiely. Everybody knows why. There were three reasons. WE first Wan tie denial of the role of the Secretary-General, incltifnq his right to submit suqqestiorrs end idees; the second wm the claim thet they were a ueoplet the third W%a the claim thet they were entitled to self-determination. TO every one of them, a reply is qiven in the first operative para9caFh of that resolution. fn8teed af payinq lip setvice to ceetein pareqraphs of th8t resolution, is Turkey prepared CII this solemn occasion here and now to eff irm adherence t0 the CefXdUtiOn and to withdraw tihese three untenable claint3 they have already pit forward, which were dealt with by the Security Council resolution in ita firet o@ratiVe paragraph? If that is the case, then quite naturally that paves the way to oubetantive and constructive negotiation. They referred p3cticularly to vlolationn by Cyprus of article 5. &I pasticfpanb in the European security process, they know full well, that States RH/ 11 s/w. 2 928 52 car. Havrolanratia, Cyprus) parties are entitled to bring mythinq connected with the human dimension of human riqhts be&ee anotopriate ~orunx3 l And the same of course applies a fortiori to th@ United Nations. That is all that Cyprus did, and it did so because of the violati0ns by Turkey. And they will come back again to human riqhts. The only violation 0f article 5 is the continued influx of the settlers. The replies we have had ttiay are not just dishearteninq. what have we 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic speech or statement discussing a conflict between Turkey and Cyprus, specifically referencing a United Nations Security Council resolution (649/1990). The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a high-level political discussion. The content focuses on the violation of human rights, self-determination, and the role of the Secretary-General, suggesting that the category should be related to international relations, governance, or politics.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International trade