at Vienna from 3 to I June 1985; took note of the important debate on the question of Namibia, held in the Security Council from 10 to 19 June 1985; 6-51 further took note of resolution 566 (1985) by which the Council condemned South Africa for its installation of a so-called interim government in Namibia and further condemned that regime for its obstruction of the implementation of Council resolution 435 (1978) by insisting on conditions contrary to the provisions of the United Nations plan for the independence of Namibia as embodied in that resolution; welcomed and endorsed the universal and categorical rejection of the “linkage” advanced by South Africa between the independence of Namibia and irrelevant and extraneous issues, such as the presence of Cuban forces in Angola (resolution 40197 A): reiterated that Security Council resolutions 385 (1976) and 435 (1978), relating to the United Nations plan for the independence of Namibia, constituted the only internationally accepted basis for a peaceful settlement of the Namibian problem, and demanded their immediate and unconditional implementation: and strongly condemned the use of the veto by two Western permanent members of the Security Council on 15 November 1985, as a result of which the Council had been prevented from taking effective measures under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations against South Africa, and appealed to them to desist from further misuse of the veto (resolution 40197 B). At the same session, the General Assembly extended the appclntment of Mr. Brajesh Chandra Mishra as United Nations Commissioner for Namibia for a one-year term of office beginning on 1 January 1986 (see item 17 Cj)) (decision 401317). At its fourteenth special session, in 1986, the General Assembly strongly condemned the racist regime of South Africa for its continued illegal occupation of 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be discussing a political issue related to a specific country (Namibia) and its occupation by another country (South Africa). The text mentions the United Nations, resolutions, and the veto power, indicating a focus on international relations and diplomacy.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief