seekers had arrived in Hungary. The overwhelming majority were of Hungarian ethnic origin. They were unanimous in agreeing that the spirit of friendship that had prevailed in Transylvania during the events of December 1989 had degenerated into a chauvinistic hatred which had sparked off the tragic events recently in the town of Marosvasarhely (Tirgu Mures). 42. His Government considered that each individual had the inalienable right to live in his homeland, where fundamental rights and freedoms must be respected. It was a historical fact that problems of national, ethnic, religious and linguistic minorities could not be solved by mass exodus. The rights of those minorities had to be respected. Hungary did not encourage anyone to leave his homeland. However, if continuing violations of fundamental rights generated refugees, Hungary would have no choice but to receive them. That was why the Hungarian Government hoped that the new democratically elected Romanian Government would be willing and able to remedy the injustices and improve the situation in accordance with its international obligations, so that minorities no longer had to leave the land of their birth. 43. Hungarian public opinion had always been generous to refugees and had spontaneously approved the Government's policy of assisting them. To enable it to continue that action, at a time when the country was entering a new era of democracy and liberty, but also one of serious economic and financial difficulties, the Hungarian Government, which already enjoyed the political and moral support of the international community, was hopeful that donor countries would respond positively to the appeal launched by UNHCR, particularly since their generosity could only strengthen the prestige of the Office of the High Commissioner and of the United Nations family as a whole, not only in Hungary but also in all the other countries of Central and Eastern Europe. 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement from the Hungarian Government, discussing the situation of Hungarian refugees in Romania and Hungary's willingness to receive them. The focus is on humanitarian aid and international cooperation, with mentions of fundamental rights, refugees, and international obligations. There is no mention of economic development, natural resources, or specific industries.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International trade