(c) by a declaration before the court in a specified case. 2, Consent to the exercise of jurisdiction under article 8 shall not be held to imply consent to the taking OC tneesures of constraint under Pert IV of the present articleti, for which a separate co,asent F;hAll bo necessary. “Article 23.Sgeciiic wtegoriea uf grogerty 1. Thr: following cetogorias of property OC n State shall not be considered at; pr0pert.y speciCica.lly in use or int-ended for use by the Statu Cor commorc:iul [non--governmental ] purpor;s~ under pnrograph (a) of arLiclr, 21:217. The Special Rapportour referred to his commentary to articles 21 to 23, a/ in which he had pointed out that, owing to the independent development of the subject of immunity from measures of constraint and that of immunity from jurisdiction, there was still a division of opinion on the aubjoct of immunity from mtw3urf3k3 of constraint, even emong the industrialiued countries which were incl fned towards restricti.ve immunity. According to one view, the power to proceed to meaeuros of constraint was regarded as tho consequence of the power to exercise jurisdiction, but the opposing view held that international law prohibitod forced execution on the property of a foreign State situated in a forum State oven whore a court of the forum State had *juris iction to adjudicate over the dispute. The former view was held by the cuurts of Swit%erland, the Netherlands and the Federal Republic of Germany, while a rwnber of socialist Governments were inclined to tho latter (a) property, including any bank accouxlt, which is in the torri(.ory of another State and io used or intended for uoo for the purposes of the diplomatic tnif-silrr of the State or its consular posts, special mitJsions, missions to international orqenixetions, or Qelsgations to organs of
**Analysis**
This text appears to be discussing international law and the concept of immunity from measures of constraint, specifically in the context of state property. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting that it is a legal document or commentary. The text mentions various countries and international organizations, which also points towards an international law or diplomatic context.

**Category**
International trade, Law