been instituted against it, or if the right or interest claimed by t.ho State is :leither admitted nor supported by ~&a..&& evidence. ” - 86 -195. With regard to paragraph 2, Borne members suggested the deletion of the entire provision which &\ppeared to be a duplication or otherwiee a contradiction of the provision in paragraph 2 of article 6 (original article 71 Modalities for giving effect to State immunity), 196. The Special Rapporteur suggested that these points should be taken into account in the Drafting Committee. 197. The Special Rapporteur noted that ono Government, in its written comment, requested the addition oE a plant breeder’s right. With a view to meeting that requcat, he proposed to amend subparagraph (a) to road I’.., copyright or any other form of intellectual or industrial property, including a plant breeder ’ 8 right”. The addition of the phrase “a right in computer-generated works” in the same paragraph was also suggested by the Special Rapporteur, taking into account the recent technical developmento in that field. The latter phrase was to be understood to include, Malia, computer programming and semiconductor chip layouts. 196. Those additional references to a plant breeder’s right. and to a right in I computer-generated work met the approval of several members, one of them, however, suggesting that the nature and scope of those rights should be made clear in the commentary. Some other members were, however, not convinced that 871 Tho text, 80 provisionally adopted on first reading by the Commission, read RS follows I Unless otherwise agreed between tho States concernsd, the immunity of B Stxto cannot be invoked before n court of another State which is otherwise compotont in a procooding which rolatos to: (a) the dnterlrtinatiun of any right oi the State ir1 a yatont, .iricIut;t,rial design, trade nimle or l)u:;i~lt!tis name, (.I ;~dlc! mark, c!opyt’ight. OI
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the immunity of a State in a court of another State, specifically in relation to intellectual property rights such as copyright, trademarks, and plant breeder's rights. The mention of computer-generated works and semiconductor chip layouts suggests a focus on technology and innovation. The language used is formal and legal, indicating a focus on international law and governance.

**Category**
Industry, Science and technology