~NIDO 500 1:48 28... 243 79 32... ~PU 115 68 59... 115 71 621- ~O 1908 844 44'1 1782 750 42'L "'IPO n.a. 67n.•• n••• 90 n.a. ~Osil 201 128 6"A. 243 118 49... alNotIncluded IretheInvitation. which.reImmedl'te1y dee~adtobeof noInterest toICAO. ~IThefigures donotlnclud,Invltltlon. to••etlna'orWorkers' Ind Bmployers' organizations, regional Intf:rlovernmenta1 orl.nlzatlons Indthe UnItedNationsRellona1 leonomic andSoeialCo.-i••lon•. ~IThefiguresrepresent theInvitation. processed bytheBaternal Relations Sector. Thus,theInvitations received bytheprogramme sectors and Immediately declined donotappearInthistable. sllThefigurosrepresent theinvitations processed bytheOffieeofthe Secretary-General. ThoseImmediately declined donotappearinthetable. AlsoanumberofInvitations tointer-agency administrative meetings whlrh tookplaceinGenevadonotappearinthefigures. ~In.a. ~Notavailable. /...-,- IV.PiOCBDURSS ANDIBCHANISKS poaDBTBRlINATION orRSpaBSSITATION A.Relevlnt proyi.ion. 28.Withr••ardtodet.l'IIlinaUon ofrlpre••ntaUon. internal con.ultatlon and co-ordination procedur••andmechanl.&. ar••etforthininternal .anual•• rul••andin.truction. ofmo.tor.lnlzatlon ••alalr.adyatatedin chapter11.Th.,ariety 1nthe.anu.l. wa.al.oaeotlooed inr.••pectofthe fo~.preci.en••••l.nath,.tc. B.Structural procedur•• 29.PartA!/pointedoutthetvo-level .tructure fordetermination ofrepre.entation whichver.e.tabll.hed Inaccordance withthe Secretary-Oeneral'. bulletin. Thes••r.:Ci)withindeparbDent. asaflr.t.creenln8 .t.p;and(il)intheR.prea.ntatlon UnitottheBlecutive OfficeottheS.cretarY-Oeneral a.atlnaldeclalon-matlna authority. Con,er••lyin.peclallzed as,ncle., thedecl.lon-.atlns pro~es.I.dltferently .tructured fromtheUnitedNation•. 30.In.ostorsanlzatlon ••theresponaiblllty forco-ordlnatlna theropreS8n­ tational activity reetawiththepartlculn~' unitalatocalpoint,whichIs uluallydenominated a.Slternal Relatlonl Oftlce,OttlceofInter-Aa.ncy Aftalrs, etc.Thetunctlonl otsuch.unitaretoreceiveInvitations, keep recordathereof, undertate consalta~lon. withlubltantlve departments, and replyoftlcially toInvitations. In.omeoraanlzatlonl, theunitplaY8amore Important rolebelnaauthorized toinfluence thedeclalons whenseneralpolicy matters GreInvolve~. Uauallyluchunitodecideonlyonacceptanco ofInvi­ tations anddeslanation ofrepr.sentatlveB. TheyQQnotuBuallyIntervene the lensthofmIB.ionl, thecontentofetatementl, preparation forparticipation 6ndr.portlnl, allofwhicharelefttothelubstantlve departm6~tB totakea responsibility. Withr.specttopracticel functions a~4powerofinfluence of SQchaunitforco-ordination, theIn.pector hasnotedaIreatvariety. Whenelaminlns theacceptance ofinvitation anddesllnation ofrepresen­ tatives, substantive dopartmenta couldaivetechnlc"l consideration. Withresardtopolicymatters, however, thesedepartment. arenotalwaysvary wellinfonRed thereon. Only.uchaunittorco-ordination haDacheck1ns and overeeaina role,thorebyintervanlna thedeclslon~matinl process. 31.Smalloraanlzatlon. (110,UPU,WIPOandWKO)Whichhavecentralized a .anasement aystemdonothavesuchaunit.andtherelatedprocedures are underadirectcontrolofthe••ecutl,eheadloroftheiroffice•. 32.rheITUhasIpeclflc procedure. 1nIt.decislon-.akinr proct.sIn accordance withitaorl.nl.atlonal .tructure. Insoneral, alldecisions on participation In.eetinas aretakenbytheCo-ordination Comalttee. However, Inca.eswheremeetIns-areofInterest onlytoaparticular pe~anent orsanoftheUnlon.thee.aminatlon otinvitation. anddeteraination ofparticipation .aybeundertaken bythatoraan. . !/JIU,Ibid.,chap.IV.pp.10-13. /...-10- C.Dtcl.lon~••~lnaPEOC!!! 33.Thedeel.lon-.atlns proce••varl••In.peela1lzed asenclel. Thisvarlet,con.l.t.at.e,era1e1e.enta••ucha'l(I)whetherthe.ystemIscentralized orDot;(11)tberoleotco-ordination unit;(Ill:Ipecltlc mandateand orlanllatlonal .andateoteachoraanl.atlon. etc. 34.In'AO.tbeunittorco-ordlnatlna repre.ontatlon A'tbea.terna1 Relation. UnitoftheOftlceoftheInter-Alency Attaitaandtheauthority tor decl.lon 1.theDirector orAI.I.tant Dlrector··Oeneral ~whenappropriate). Thereilanotherunitactlnathllway:theOtticeofth~Dlrector-O.neral whichappearlalatina1.upervllory unit.However. udderausterity mealures tatenrecently inordertocopewiththetln.ncia1 crisis.theprocedures vere revl.edln.uchavaythatallthedecl.lonl onrepresentation whichvould incurelpendlture••hou1dbet.tenbyth.OfficeottheDlrecto~·-General. Onlythec••••whichh.venofln.nclal imp1ic.tions arenowdealtwithbythe IIterna1 Relation. Unit. 35.WHOha.acentralunitforco-ordin.tion dealingwiththemanagement of theinvlt.tlon,. AllInvlt.tion. (Inc1bdlng InvltMtions .enttoIndividual.) arelenttothllunittorlnde.lng. routlnatotheproaramme(l) concerned and/orrellonal ottlce(.) andfollow-up purpo.e.. Substantive consultation. areundert.ken withintheprolr...econcerned. whichwilllerve.1abasiltor
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a formal document discussing the internal procedures and structures of an organization, specifically related to the management of invitations and representation. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a focus on administrative and organizational matters rather than a specific field of expertise like healthcare or education. The text also mentions various departments and offices within the organization, which further supports the conclusion that this is an internal document.

**Category**
International Relations, Administration