under the convention must be as complete as possible and intrusive to an extent not hitherto realized under any other arms control agreement. In the first instance, this means a challenge inspection component of exceptional rigour. Whether we call it "challenge inspection" or "inspection on request" CD/PV.573 5 (Mr. Shannon. Canada) or however we may characterize it, it stands as the ultimate safety net of the convention - the final means under the convention whereby a State party can seek assurance that other States parties remain in full compliance with their obligations. Notwithstanding the well-understood apprehensions of some negotiators, we are also convinced that a highly intrusive challenge inspection regime - one that includes access to any site and which ensures that, if it so wishes, the State initiating the inspection process may be represented during it by the presence of an observer - can be made to work without unduly compromising those concerns. In this respect, we have noted the recent statements of Mr. Waldegrave, of the United Kingdom, and the paper he introduced (CD/1012) reporting on his country's experiences in conducting national trial challenge inspections. We also have noted the statement of Ambassador von Wagner, of the Federal Republic of Germany, on 7 August, in which he introduced paper CD/1026. While we recognize that the results of the United Kingdom national trial inspections and those of similar trial inspections elsewhere may not be accepted by some as conclusive, they are highly instructive and offer a concrete basis upon- which negotiators can more knowledgeably approach the remaining difficulties with this apsect of the verification issue. But even when we have satisfactorily resolved the challenge inspection issue, Canada still believes that the verification system for the convention would require additional measures if it is to be effective, measures which 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing a treaty or agreement related to arms control, specifically the verification process and the role of challenge inspections in ensuring compliance. The language used is technical and diplomatic, suggesting that the topic is complex and requires careful consideration. Given the focus on international relations and the regulation of military activities, it is likely that the text falls under a category related to international relations or global governance.

**Category**
International relations