toleration by the authorities of a State of organiaed activities calculated to carry out terrorist acts in another State.” (2) The object of the title of this articlef *‘International terrorism”, is to distinguish the terrorism in questiorr from internal terrorism. International terrorism is terrorism organiaed and carried out by a State against another State, whereas internal terrorism is organiaed and carried out in the territory of a State by nationals of tha\; State. Such terrorism comes under internal law, since it does not endanger international relations. (3) m defines the constituent elements of international terrorism, that is to say: (a) The intervention of agents or representatives of a State, (b) Such intervention must slso consist of specific acts; organizing, assisting, financing or encouraging the ter.corist activities) or tolerating terrorist activities in the territory of the State. The word “tolerating” implies conscious acceptance of terrorist activity. (c) Lastly, the acts in question must be cf such a nature as to create a state of terror in the minds of public figures, groups of persons or the general public. The expression “public figures” means not only political leaders, that is to say members of d Government, members of political assemblies or trade union leaders, but also other eminent persons who play an important part in the economic or social life of a country. */- Paragraph 2 will be reviewed in the light of the provisions on complicity and on crimes against humanity which will be examined by the Commission at a later stage, - 63 -(4) PeraeraahP concerns the participation of individuals in acts of terrorism of agents or representatives of the State. It does not cover acts of terrorism committed by individuals which have no link with international acts of terrorism as defined in paragraph 1 of article 16.
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing international law and terrorism, specifically defining international terrorism and its constituent elements. It does not seem to be related to any of the traditional economic or social development fields. Instead, it appears to be focused on a specific aspect of international relations and law.

**Category**
International relations, Law