55. The representative of the Fetherlands expressed his support for the proposal by Finland on the grounds that he wanted to preclude the possibility of partial ratification of the Convention and preferred the approach taken in that proposal to the adoption of a reciprocity clause. 56. The representative of Morocco also supported the proposal by Finland and suggested that it could b,1; improved by substituting the word “may” by the word “shall”. That would facilitate the translation of the provision int3 other 1 anguage s . The representatives of Mexico and India supported the proposed amendment. However, the representative of Sweden stated that the words “may not” were sufficiently strong and clear in English and should be left as they were in the proposal, adding that an appropriate translation could be found in other languages. 51. The representatives of the United States, France and Finland proposed that the word “part” should read “Part” in arder to make it clear that what was meant was any of the “Parts” of the Convention and not any portion of it. The representative of France suggested that the words “a whole Part” could be used in order to make matterr even clearer. 58. The representative of France suggested that the words ‘I, nor make reservations on any Part of it, nor” be inserted in the proposal instead of “, or” between the words “it” and “without”. However, the representative of Finland suggested that that proposed addition be omitted as, if included, it might gi-ze rise to some confusion, particularly since there was already a separate provision on the question of reservations. 54. At its 3rd meeting on 30 May 1990, the Working Group continued consideration of former article 86 (now article 87). Speaking on the suggested change of the 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing amendments to a treaty or convention, specifically regarding the process of ratification and reservations. The language used is formal and technical, suggesting that the topic is related to international law or diplomacy. The specific details mentioned, such as "parts" and "reservations", further support this analysis.

**Category**
International law, Diplomacy