negotiations cannot be separated from the resolutions adopted by the General Assembly on the decoloniza- tion of the Malvinas archipelago, especially resolu- tion 2065 (XX), adopted in 1965. This is a question which my country deems so fundamental that the President of the Republic of Panama, Mr, Aristides Royo, lhas stated the following: “It is a fact that the United Kingdom, during its occupation of the Malvinas and its dependencies, has long caused great annoyance by its failure to heed the resolutions on decolonization adopted in the IJnited Nations. Argentina, in order to revindi- cate its national honour and interests, has not been the cause but it has suffered the result of an unjust and unacceptable situation, rendered worse by the continued reluctance of the United Kingdom to reach a peaceful agreement after many years of fruitless negotiations. The United Kingdom is the party which completely undermined the principle of lalw by denying any results or hopes to the negotiation process.” 66. Apart from this most fundamental issue, I should like to refer to the elements contained in the draft resolution. They have already been mentioned by the represe:ntative of Spain. 67. Tlhose elements are not set out here in the order which my country would have preferred. Panama informed the Council of the urgency of proceeding first to an immediate cease-fire and to an immediate cessa- tion of all military activities. My country would have liked that cease-fire to have been ordered by the Coun- cil, in accordance with its powers, and concurrently the Secretary-General might then have started to act in pursuance of the Council’s mandate. 68. We are placing on the very strong and competent shoulders of the Secretary-General a very difficult responisibility. We must be aware of that situation. 69. The renewed mission of good offices which is 
**Analysis**
The text discusses a political conflict between Argentina and the United Kingdom regarding the Malvinas archipelago, and the role of the United Nations in resolving the issue. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting a high-level international debate. The text mentions the General Assembly, the Council, and the Secretary-General, indicating a focus on international relations and diplomacy.

**Category**
International relations, Humanitarian aid and relief