although the legal working group had not yet been established, the Secretariat was operating on the assumption that it would hold two sessions at Geneva lasting five working days in order to give the Committee as exact an estimate of expenditures as possible. 12. Mr. NASSER (Egypt) said it was extremely important that the General Assembly should take a close look at its forty-fifth session at the situation of the contingency fund in order to ensure that the fund was able to meet the Organization's needs. He also wondered why, if senior posts were necessary at Geneva - and they were - to ensure smooth inter-agency co-ordination, similar provisions had not been made for the New York and Nairobi units. He also sought confirmation that the regional meetings would in fact be held at the headquarters of the regional commissions and, that being the case, an explanation of the appropriations requested in paragraph 16 of dociment A/C.5/44/54. 13. Mr. ETUKET (Uganda) first sought reassurances that the appropriations requested thus far for the regional meetings, figures for which were contained in the annex to document A/C.5/44/54, would be sufficient to allow those meetings to be held. With regard to the anticipated staffing of the secretariat at Geneva and the two units, the Secretary-General must review the proposals contained in paragraph 7 with a view to formulating recommendations for the equitable division of resources among the three units, bearing in mind the tasks of each one. In view of their political and technical significance, the New York and Nairobi units fully deserved to have posts at a higher level than that currently proposed. It was also to be hoped that the Secretary-General would take the need for equitable geographic distribution into account when filling those posts. Finally, the Secretary-General must look for ways o,f offsetting some of the anticipated costs through savings in 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the budget and organization of a United Nations agency, with a focus on staffing, meetings, and resource allocation. The language used is formal and bureaucratic, suggesting that it is related to the administrative or organizational aspects of the agency rather than its specific programs or activities. The mention of "regional meetings" and "regional commissions" suggests that the agency may be dealing with global or international issues, but the language does not suggest that these issues are related to specific fields such as economic development, natural resources, or health.

**Category**
International Relations, Employment