172. The Special Rapporteur proposed ,with a view to reaching agreement on the title of Part III, a neutral formulation which might read “Activities of States to which immunity does not apply”, or, as suggested by one member at the previous session, “Cases in which State immunity may not be invoked before the court of another State”. If there was no support for any such formulation, he said, the subject should be decided upon at the conclusion of the consideration of the present articles. 173. During the Commission’s discussion of the topic, some members expressed support for a neutral formulation of the title along the lines suggested by the Special Rapporteur. One member in this connection proposed an alternative proposal to amend i;he title to reads “Activities of Statos in respect of which States agree not to invoke immunity”. 174. In the light of the above, and considering that no member had opposed the adoption of a neutral formulation, the Special Rapporteur suggested that the Drafting Committee should be entrusted to work out a generally acceptable wording for the title of Part III, - 76 -Article* Contracts=/ 175. The Special Rapporteur recalled that divergent views had been expressed on this draft article. Some members of the Commieeion, am well as some delegations in the Sixth Committee and one Qovernment in its written comments, had suggested the deletion of the article. In their view, those labour law disputes envisaged in the present text were normally settled by mutual agreement or by insurance coverage. It was further euggeeted that the scarcity of judicial practice or evidence of State practice would not justify the inclusion of the provision. Others, however, considered the draft article I.91The text, as provisionally adopted on first reading by the Commission, read as followsl “Article-l2. Cnntractsm 1. Unless otherwise agreed between the States concerned, the immunity
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the legal framework for international relations, specifically the immunity of states in relation to labor law disputes. It seems to be focused on the drafting of a treaty or agreement, with the Special Rapporteur suggesting a neutral formulation for the title of Part III. The content of the text does not directly relate to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, humanitarian aid, relief, culture, or science and technology.

**Category**
Employment