dismissal, the Tribunal is entirely in accord with the conclusion s reached by the JAB on this issue for the reasons stated by it. Th e Applicant's status as a person summarily dismissed for seriou s misconduct was not affected by the presence of his name in the memory banks of the Organization's computer. Accordingly,this claim bein g utterly without merit, it is denied by the Tribunal and the Tribunal finds it unnecessary to consider the question of whether the clai m would be time-barred on account of staff rule 103.15 as the Respondent argues. XXXVIII. The Applicant has asserted that the Administration has failed to make clear the amount he al legedly misappropriated, and the number of fictitious recipients. This assertion is not borne out by th e evidence, which shows the numb er to have been 35 and the amount to be US$207,582, and the Tribunal finds that as of the date of th e Applicant's separation from the U.N. he was indebted to th e Organization in that amount. XXXIX.In view of the foregoing, the Tribunal: 1.Rejects the applications in cases Nos. 511 and 497 i n their entirety; 2.Denies the request for counsel fees and expenses. (Signatures) Roger PINTO President- 31 - Jerome ACKERMAN Vice-President Francisco A. FORTEZA Member Geneva, 18 May 1990 R. Maria VICIEN-MILBURN Executive Secretary 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a judgment or decision from a tribunal regarding a dispute between an applicant and the United Nations (U.N.). The language used is formal and technical, suggesting a specialized context. The issues discussed include employment, finance, and possibly administrative procedures. Given the context and language, it is likely that the text is related to employment or administrative matters within the U.N. or a similar international organization.

**Category**
Employment, Humanitarian aid and relief