at the prevailing United Nations Credit Union savings account rate during the period in question on the sum he would hav e been entitled to withdraw from the UNJSPF in mid-1982 had the Organization fulfilled its obligation to transmit th e appellant's separation forms to the UNJSPF. 29.The Panel makes no further recommendation in support o f this appeal." On 20 September 1988, the Officer-in-Charge of the Department of Administration and Management informed the Applicant that th e Secretary-General had decided to accept the JAB recommendation t o transmit the P.35 form to the UNJSPF but had decided not to accept the recommendation to pay interest since the Applicant had filed hi s "appeal against the contested decision only after four and a hal f years and therefore payment of interest is inappropriate under either the Staff Rules or the Financial Rules". On 31 January 1989, the Applicant filed with the Tribunal the application referred to above in the "first case". The JAB adopted its report on the "second case" on 9 Augus t- 14 - 1988. Its conclusion and recommendation read as follows: "Conclusions and recommendation 85.Based upon the foregoing, the Panel concluded that th e Secretary-General's findings were based upon correct an d complete information, after a thorough audit and investigation which provided to the appellant all of the protections of due process. 86.The Panel concluded further that the Secretary-General di d not err in his finding that the appellant's misconduct wa s patent and clearly incompatible with his continued service in the Organization. 87.Accordingly, the Panel makes n o recommendation in support of the Appeal." On 10 August 1988, the Officer-in-Charge of the Department of Administration and Management informed the Applicant that th e Secretary-General had decided to maintain the contested decision i n the light of the Board's report.
**Analysis**
The text appears to be related to the administration and management of an international organization, specifically the United Nations, and involves a dispute over a employee's separation and potential compensation. The language and terminology used suggest that the text is focused on organizational policies, procedures, and decisions, rather than specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues.

**Category**
Employment, Humanitarian aid and relief