recommendation relating to the furtherance of human rights. 104. Since the Centre for Human Rights was based at Geneva, there was no reason for policy-making organs to meet in New YorkJ yet one P-2 post had already been transferred from Geneva, and another P-2 post in New York was envisaged, as a result of such activities. His delegation also doubted whether the revised estimate contained in document A/C.S/40/9 was fully justified. Lastly, it objected to meeting the travel costs of the representatives of so-called national liberation movements. 105. The CHAIRMAN invited the Committee to vote on the recommendation contained in paragraph 678 of the CPC report. 106. At the request of the representative of the United States of America, a recorded vote was taken. In favours Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Congo, Cuba, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, German Democratic Republic, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Romania, Rwanda, Saud~ Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Spain, Sudan, Swaziland, Sweden, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, I ... English Page 19 United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Venezuela, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zambia. Against: United States of America. Abstaining: None. 107. The recommendation of the Advisory Committee for an appropriation in the amount of $9,776,800 under section 23 for the biennium 1986-1987 was approved 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing a recommendation for funding and activities related to human rights, which suggests that the topic is more focused on social and humanitarian issues rather than economic or environmental ones. The mention of specific countries and organizations also implies an international context.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, Human rights