Absta_ining: Belgium, France, Germany, Federal and the arbitrary nature of the recommendation were Repubhc of, Italy, Japan, Spain. not acceptable. Neither were unbalanced references Draft resolution E/1986/L.14 was adopted by 34 to support by transnational corporations for the votes to 2, with 6 abstentions (resolution 198611). South African ~egi~e. The Canadian delegation had 9. ~r. J:IANTKE (Federal Republic of Germany), there~ore abstamed m t~e vote on the paragraphs in speakmg m explanation of vote on behalf of his own question. Canada was m favour of the immediate delegatio~ and the delt:gation.s of France, Belgium, abolition of apartheid and the establishment of a Italy, Spam and the Umted Kmgdom, said that they non-racial, representative Government in both South abhorred apartheid. However, the resolution just Africa and Nami~ia. It was particularly distressed by adopted had presented them with a number of the extreme actiOn taken by South Africa in the problems which had prevented them from voting in previou~ few hou!s, .which would only serve to favour of it, for the same reason that they had been undermme the objectives of peaceful transition to unable to support the resc:>lution on the same subject majority rule, which Canada was supporting through at the second regular sessiOn of 1985 of the Council. the Commonwealth initiative and other efforts. The European Community's Code of Conduct for 15. Mr. LA VROV (Union of Soviet Socialist Re- European . transnational corporations operating in publics) said that his delegation had voted in favour South Afnca ~<1:d recently been reinforced in pur-of paragraphs 3, 5, 6 and 8 and of the text that had suance of declSlons adopted by the Ministers for just been adopted as a whole. His delegation had Foreign Affairs of the 12 States members of the firm~y supported th~ c;:~uncil decision to hold public 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing a United Nations resolution related to apartheid in South Africa and Namibia, with various countries expressing their opinions and voting patterns. While there is no explicit mention of economic development, natural resources, or industry, the resolution's focus on the role of transnational corporations and the establishment of a non-racial, representative government in South Africa and Namibia suggests that the category is more likely to be related to international relations, human rights, or humanitarian aid.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief