Kuwait, Lesotho, Liberia. Libyan Arab Jamabiriya' Madagascar' alaysia, Maldives, Ma1i, Mauritania' Mexico' Mongolia' Morocco' Mozanbique, Nepal, Nigeria, onan, Pakistan, Panama' Peru' PhiLippines' Poland' Oatar' Romania' Rvranda, saudi Arabi.a, Senegal, Singapore, somalia' Sr1 r,anka, Sudan, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic' Thailand' Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist RepulrL ic, Union 5f Soviet socjalist Repubtics' United Arab Enirales, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay' venezueLa, viet Nam, Yenen. Yugosl5ei1, zairer zambia' Z inbabwe . !3g.i$: BeIgium. canada, Denmark, Finland, Gernany' Federal Republic of.Icetand.Israel,Japan,Luxembourq'Netherlands'Norltay' Portugal, Svreden. United I(ingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United SEates of Anerica' Abstaining: Austrdlia. Austria' France, Greece, Ireland, ltaly, New zealand, spain. Tur key. 13. statenents in explanation of vote after the vote were nade by che representatives of Argentina' Australia, Austria. Canada, Ecuador, Japan' Mexico' Turkey, lhe united Arab Emir3tes and the uni.ted states of Anerica' III. RECOMI\,IENDATIONS OF THE SPECIAL POLITICAL COMMITTEE 14. The Special Political corunittee recommends to Ehe General Assembly the adoption of the following draft resolutions: Ouest ions relating to information A The General Assenbly, Recalling its resolutions 3535 (xxx) of t7 Decenber L975, 3l/L39 of lg oecetnuer fg16, 33/LL5 A to c of 18 December L9'18, 34/I8L and 341182 of l8 December Lg7g, 35/2OI of 16 Decenb€r 1980' 36/f49 B of 16 December l98I' 3'1/94 B of 10 Decembet Lg82, 38/82 B of 1"5 Decenber 1983 and 39/98 A ot 14 December 1984, on questions relating Co infornation' Recallinq article 19 5f the Universal Declaration of Human Rights' f.'/ wnicfr proviaes that everyone has the right to freedon of opinion and 3/ Resolution 2I7 A (III).^/40 /ro24 EngI i sh Page 5 expression and that this right includes freedon to hold opinions htithout interference and to seek, receive and inpart infornation and ideas through any
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a list of countries and a draft resolution on questions relating to information, which is likely related to human rights and freedom of expression. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that it may be a UN document. The text does not mention specific economic or environmental issues, but rather focuses on the right to seek, receive, and impart information.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International relations