accordance with the resolutions of the General Assembly and the Security Council, as well as the decisions of the United Nations Council for Namibia recently adopted at its Extraordinary Plenary Meetings at Vienna. They declared that the installation of the so-called interim government was an affront to the efforts of the United Nations Council for Namibia and of the United Nations for the early implementation of Security Council resolu- tion 435 (1978 )-approving the United Nations plan for the independence of Namibia-and was proof of the crimi- nal duplicity of the South African regime. 23. They reaffirmed their fullest support for the struggle of the Namibian people and for SWAPO, their sole, authentic representative, emphasizing the necessity for the co-ordination of efforts with SWAP0 for the indepen- dence of Namibia. 24. They expressed concern about the tense situation in the southern African region, in particular about South Africa’s recent acts of aggression against Angola and Bot- swana; they emphasized the need for appropriate measures to be taken by the international community, and urged the Security Council to impose comprehensive mandatory sanctions against South Africa under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations. 25. They reaffirmed the decisions recently adopted by the United Nations Council for Namibia at its Extraordinary Plenary Meetings, held at Vienna, in particular those con- tained in its Programme of Action [see S/17184, annex], to the effect that the Council would promote the imposition of mandatory sanctions against South Africa by the Secu- rity Council in conformity with Chapter VII of the Charter at its next meeting on the question of Namibia, with the aim of ensuring the implementation of the United Nations plan and that it would further urge members of the Secu- rity Council which have protected South Africa in the past 
**Analysis**
The text discusses the political situation in Namibia and the actions of the South African regime, as well as the efforts of the United Nations Council for Namibia and the Security Council to promote independence and impose sanctions. The language used is formal and diplomatic, indicating a focus on international relations and politics. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, culture, or science and technology, suggesting that these categories are not relevant.

**Category**
International relations, Politics