have e4)lred. or be@ teld.Eated rithout.being EubE€qu@tly!oer€d.. lhege were Uee declalatioas o{ Iraziil, Botiviar._Eaiwo, haoce, Grateuala, I!a, South lfrj.can flrail odanil Tukey.1ZA/ 4O /682 English Page I1 18 States in the A6ian-lfd.cett le€Lon, !!aD€IJr, Botsrrsla, Caobodiaz 8grpt, Ganbian Iadia, Japdl Kogra, L,iberJ.a, llalari, Mar:ritlus, NieBrl,ar Paklstor PhAlippj.ues, Sooal.ia, Sudan, Swa,";Iand,, Togo ard Ug$aia. Out of, thege tbe d.ec1alatiols oad.e by Nigeria ernd Oganda wer€ practlcally wlth no resoryatioas aDd substa.utive lrlEerratiatrs were contaiaed ll1 the declaratlons dsposi.ted by Indiar Paklstan, Maurltlus and the Pbilippiaee. In the retrai.ai.ug caEeE the declaratims coutaiaed sone r€se::nra'ti.ous. tr'loo the j-rdtial- stsges of the frnqtiouiag of tbe Court tr,. 1946 u{rto tba pres@.t 42 caeeel5 had been brcught }€fo!€ tbe (v.r. v.lloruay) u.K. (24)(c\ tEA/4O/682 English Paqe 12 Courf, as c@tenti.ous proceedj.:tgE apert fr@ those W eirf,ue of specia.l agrse@qxts. out of th6Ee j.E eigbt caseB the Court fcnEd tbat it corrld, take ao t\:rtber steps upcoe the applJ.cati@ aE it nes dritted W tbe edicant state that the oppoEbg party did not accept tbe Court I s ;urisdlcticorlo. In eigbt othe! cas€s the questj,cll of juCsaiictioD was raiged or the opposite party did not €6,te! a[ aplearaiac€, but th€ Corrt bad 1lroc€edetl to jr:dguat eif.her reboliUag or delid!€ ;u:isdict1oa.17 15.Il tile folJ.orJ:rg €i€ht cas6s, fxe Cor:tt forad tbat1t could. take ao further stsps r4rotl aa Appllcatioutli 'riri.ch it was adEttted tJrat tJre opposl-ag party did uot accEpt its Ju=Lsd,1ctioo. V.E1I1€EIY (uartea tea ringdo[tr v. Cbile otl Udt€d, tri'rgdou ?.);@A€a.l€I(uritea states n ussn) ; (Oaited. Statee (IlEiteil Ki.n€don v. Ic€land; llG % Ic-taDd)l(Australl'a v. lbaoce; l{er Zealand v.States v. Y. irssR) tA/40/ 682 Engllsb Paqe t3 It $ould be aoticeil that out o! lhe 42 conteatious lroae€di.DgE ffLed. rrltll tbe Courb nors Ulan cde half wea€ jlstitutod. drEi.ag the deoader 19N - 1960, rberBa.s ll1 the
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a report or statement from an international organization, likely the United Nations, regarding the progress of a court case or a declaration of independence by various countries. The language used is formal and technical, with references to international law and court proceedings. The text does not mention economic development, natural resources, agriculture, industry, transport, communication, health, education, employment, humanitarian aid, or culture.

**Category**
International law, Politics