of draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.80. 397. At the same meeting, the draft resolution was adopted without a vote. 398. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/53. Situation of human rights in southern Lebanon 399. In connection with this matter, the Commission had before it the following documents: E/CN.4/1990/60, E/CN.4/1990/61, E/CN.4/1990/63, E/CN.4/1990/NGO/24. 400. At the 52nd meeting, on 6 March 1990, the observer for Lebanon introduced draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.84, sponsored by Bahrain*, Bangladesh, the Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic*, Democratic Yemen*, Egypt*, India, the Islamic Republic of Iran*, Jordan*, Kuwait*, Lebanon*, Morocco, Pakistan, Qatar*, Somalia, Sudan* and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. Algeria*, Cuba, Saudi Arabia* and Tunisia* subsequently joined the sponsors. 401. Statements relating to the draft resolution were made by the representative of the United States of America and by the Observers for Israel and the Syrian Arab Republic. 402. The representative of the United States of America requested a roll-call vote on draft resolution E/CN.4/1990/L.84. The draft resolution was adopted by 41 votes to 1, with 1 abstention. The voting was as follows: -244-In favour; Argentina, Bangladesh, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Colombia, Cuba, Cyprus, Ethiopia, Prance, Gambia, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Hungary, India, Iraq, Italy, Japan, Madagascar, Mexico, Morocco, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Peru, Philippines, Portugal, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Venezuela and Yugoslavia. Against; United States of America. Abstaining; Swaziland. 403. For the text as adopted, see chapter II, section A, resolution 1990/54. 404. Statements were made by the Observers for Lebanon and the Syrian Arab Republic after the vote. Situation of human rights in Guatemala 405. In connection with this matter, the Commission had before it the
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a report from the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, discussing the adoption of resolutions related to human rights situations in various countries, including southern Lebanon and Guatemala. The language used is formal and diplomatic, with references to resolutions, documents, and voting records. This suggests that the text is related to human rights and international relations, rather than economic development or other fields.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, Human rights