with that other party. He cit ed as an example the case of one of his colleagues. The Tribunal requested a clarification from th e Respondent on this subject. The Tribunal is satisfied from th e clarification received, that the colleague in question was n ot granted a probationary appointment until he had resigned from his post wit h his Government. XXVIII. Moreover, the Tribunal does not find in this case an y evidence of prejudice, improper motivation or any other extraneous reaso n vitiating any of the Responden t's decisions concerning the Applicant. XVIII.For the foregoing reasons, the application is rejected in its entirety. (Signatures) Ahmed OSMAN Vice-President, presiding Arnold KEAN Member- 21 - Francisco A. FORTEZA Member Geneva, 23 May 1990 R. Maria VICIEN-MILBURN Executive Secretary 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a decision or ruling made by a tribunal or court, likely related to a job application or employment dispute. The language used is formal and technical, with references to specific rules and procedures. The content does not seem to be related to economic development, natural resources, agriculture, forestry, fishing, industry, transport, communication, international trade, health, education, humanitarian aid, or culture.

**Category**
Employment