Tunisian Convention which was to precede that ex­ change, France is not responsible for appraisal of the circumstances which have led Italy itsdf to desire that postponement". Hence there ll'as i11 fact 110 cession <d. territory, -because the Fre11ch troops continued to oc­ cupy the posts they had established alonR the frontier, namely, Aouzou, Gouro, Tekro, Ouri and OuiallRO- lmmediately after the Second World War, the Treaty of Peace between the Allied Powers and Italy, signed on I O February 1947, provided in article 23, paragraph I, that "Italy renounces all right and title to the Italian territorial possessions in Africa; i.e. Libya, Eritrea and Italian Somaliland". Furthermore, on 15 December 1950, at its fifth ses­ sion, the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted resolution 392 (V), entitled "Procedure to be adopted to delimit the boundaries of the former Italian colonies in so far as they are not ~lready fixed by international agreement"'. The resolution recom­ mends, in paragraph I ({I), with respect to Libya: "That the portion of its boundary with French territory not already delimited by international agreement be de­ limited, upon Libya's achievement of independence, by negotiation between the Libyan and French Gov­ ernments, assisted on the request of either party by a third person to be selected by them or, failing their agreement, to be appointed by the Secretary­ General"'. It was pursuant to this resolution that a Treaty of Friendship and Good Neighbourliness between the French Republic and the United Kingdom of Libya was concluded at Tripoli on 10 August 1955. This Treaty clearly states, in article 3: "The two High Con­ tracting Parties recognize that the frontiers between the territory of Libya, on the one hand, and the ter­ ritories of Tunisia, Algeria, French West Africa and 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be discussing the historical context and legal agreements surrounding the borders and territories of Libya, Tunisia, and France. The text mentions treaties, resolutions, and territorial possessions, indicating a focus on international relations and diplomacy. The language used is formal and legalistic, suggesting a focus on governance and state-level agreements.

**Category**
International relations