two nations, is the direct result of the viol.enb takeover of the Government and administration of the country by che Greek CyPriots in 1963 in flagrant violation of the Constilution of Cyprus. If the two CyPriot PeoPles who have been atlrninistering their affairs seParatell' for over 26 years should decide' in the exercise of their right of se I f-dete rmination, to forn a Federal Republic of Cyprus, then perhaps sorne parallef could be drawn between the two Gelmanys and the two Cypriot states. I night nention, in this couection, that the Greek CyPriot television screened a Turkish fifn on I June. The filrn was not Political. It vtas about a lonel.y woman. After the screening, telephone threats started coming to theA/44/956 5/21367 English Page2 ANNEX Letter dated20June1990fromMr.O.erKoray addressed totheSecretary General Atthedebate intheSecurity Council thattookplaceon15June1990in connection withtheextension ofthemandate ofUNFICYP, therepresentative ofthe GreekCypriots, Mr.Mavrommatis, tookthefloorafter mystatement and,inthe exercise ofhisrightofreply, madeassertions andallegations whichitismy duty,astherepresentative oftheTurkish Republic ofNorthern Cyprus, to challenge. First, Ishould liketoremind Mr.Mavrommatis thatquestions regarding the substance oftheCyprus problem aretobeaddressed nottoTurkey buttothe Turkish Republic ofNorthern Cyprus, thecounterpart oftheGreekCypriots with whomtheywilleventually havetocometotermstoestablish apartnership. To pretend thattheTurkish Republic ofNorthern Cyprus doesnotexist.thatthe dispute isbetween theGreekCypriots andTurkey, istobeoblivious to,and totally cutofffromreality. Afederation between Turkish Cypriots andGreek Cypriots willnever comeaboutiftheGreekCypriots cannot freethemselves from thedelusion underwhichtheyarelabouring. Letmerecall onceagainthat,since 1963,whentheGreekCypriot onslaught ontheisland began, thedifferences have beenbetween thetwoCypriot peoples anditistheywhowillfindawayoutof thesedifficulties. Thisismadeabundantly clearinresolution 649(1990). Thewildfigures citedbyMr.Mavromrnatis inconnection withthepopulation of mycountry aresopreposterous thattheydonotevenwarrant beingrefuted. Mr.Mavrommatis alsoreferred toBerlin andthelackoffreedom ofmovement, presumably trying tocompare Cyprus tothetimewhenthewalldivided Berlin. This isacompletely falseanalogy. Germany wasasingle nation whichwasdivided against itswillafterthewar onthebasisofdiffering ideologies. NowthattheideOlogical barriers are falling, thetwoGermanys are,byexercising theirrighttoself-determination, taking stepstounite. Thedivision ofCyprus, whichwasonceapartnership republic consisting at twonations, isthedirect result oftheviolent takeover oftheGovernment and administration ofthecountry bytheGreekCypriots in1963inflagrant violation oftheConstitution ofCyprus. IfthetwoCypriot peoples whohavebeen administering theiraffairs separately forover26yearsshould decide, inthe exercise oftheirrightofself-determination, toformaFederal Republic of Cyprus. thenperhaps someparallel couldbedrawnbetween thetwoGermanys andthe twoCypriot states. Imightmention, inthisconnection, thattheGreekCypriot television
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a diplomatic statement or a speech, likely related to the Cyprus dispute. The author is presenting a historical perspective on the conflict and making comparisons to the reunification of Germany. The text does not mention specific economic, environmental, or scientific issues, but rather focuses on the political and historical aspects of the conflict.

**Category**
International relations, Politics