objecting to proposals of a modest nature. But the section to be voted upon contained proposals involving an increase of roughly $500,000 in respect of two large operations. The rise of some 1.7 per cent was high compared to the expenditure related to the regional commissions for Latin America, Western Asia and Africa, for example, and unjustified in the current world economic situation. His delegation, therefore, could not support the proposals. 84. At the request of the representative of the United States of America, a recorded vote was taken. In favour: Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Burkina Faso, Burma, Burundi, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Congo, Denmark, Ecuador, Egypt, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Federal Republic of, Ghana, Greece, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, Kuwait, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Peru, Portugal, Qatar, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Singapore, Spain, Sudan, Swaziland, Sweden, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United Republic of Tanzania, Venezuela, Yemen, Yugoslavia, zaire, Zambia. I ... A/C.5/40/SR.36 English Page 16 Againsts Bulgaria, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Czechoslovakia, German Democratic Republic, Hungary, Mongolia, Poland, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United States of America. Abstainings None •. 85. The recommendation of the Advisory Committee for an appropriation in the amount of $32,154,100 under section 21 for the biennium 1986-1987 was approved in first reading by 85 votes to 10. 86. Mr. KRAMER (United States of America), speaking in explanation of vote, said that, although his country supported the activities of UNHCR, his delegation could 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be a record of a vote on a budget proposal for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the discussion surrounding it. The proposal involves an increase in funding for two large operations, which is deemed unjustified by one delegation due to the current economic situation. The text does not contain specific details about the operations or the activities of UNHCR, but it does mention the overall budget and the voting results.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International trade