16. He doubted whether the adjective "reasonable" in articles 6 and 7 could adequately replace the idea of fair distribution conveyed by the notion of "shared natural resource". Draft article 8 contained a list of parameters which was defective because it was not exhaustive and it failed to indicate the importance of certain priority uses, such as drinking-water supply. What was even more serious, article 8 omitted certain inviolable principles which should take precedence in cases where, for various reasons, the obligation to negotiate provided for in paragraph 2 could not be invoked. 17. Draft article 28 lli was appropriate in principle: it specifically extended the protective measures provided for in the two Additional Protocols to the Geneva Conventions of 1949. 18. With regard to State responsibility, he believed that the study of that question would benefit from new impetus, which would enable it to take its rightful place in the Commission's programme of work, thanks to the activities of the Special Rapporteur. The work of the ILC in that field \'Tould make it possible to formulate rules for the international conduct of States in a world in which continuing violations of the primary rules and responsibility were to some extent encouraged by the absence of secondary rules that would spell out all the legal consequences of those violations. 19. The drawing up of provisions relating to the content, forms and degrees of responsibility should not be limited to traditional rules but should also address the questions raised by international crimes, including aggression, and questions pertaining to jus cpgens. In addition, the arrangement of the draft articles should be reviewed, and a specific chapter should be devoted to international crimes which, logically, had more serious consequences than other internationally wrongful acts. The fundamental notion of the "injured State" should, in the case 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing international law and the responsibilities of states, specifically in relation to natural resources and the consequences of violating international rules. The language used is formal and technical, indicating that it is a legal document or analysis. The text does not mention economic development, agriculture, forestry, or fishing, and it does not seem to be related to health, education, employment, or culture.

**Category**
International humanitarian law, Humanitarian aid and relief