jurisdiction over drug-related offences, in conformity with article 4, would be passed in his country in the near future. One observer pointed out that paragraph 2 of article 4, based on the principle aut dedere aut judicare . could not be applied in his country; however, as an alternative solution, his Government was ready to offer more possibilities for extradition through bilateral agreements. 94. Many speakers indicated that laws had been drafted in their countries and bilateral agreements concluded to implement the provisions of article 5 on confiscation. Some representatives stressed that paragraph 4 of that article, concerning foreign orders of confiscation, required the reconsideration of certain basic concepts of their penal laws and the amendment of existing domestic legislation. One observer indicated that subparagraph 5 (b), concerning seized proceeds and property to be contributed to intergovernmental bodies, could not be applied under the domestic law of his country. 95. As regards article 6 on extradition, several speakers reported on legislative amendments being considered in their countries with a view to offering more possibilities for extradition and simplifying the technical requirements in extradition procedures. One representative indicated that a constitutional amendment was being contemplated in his country to allow for the extradition of nationals. 96. Commenting on article 7 on mutual legal assistance, one speaker stressed the absolute need for confidentiality concerning requests for legal assistance, in particular those aimed at freezing proceeds. Regarding both articles 6 and 7, many speakers reported on bilateral and multilateral agreements of co-operation negotiated by their countries. 97. Concerning article 9 on other forms of co-operation and training, several speakers informed the Commission of training programmes drawn up in their countries for law enforcement officers. One observer, referring to the provisions of the 1988 Convention relating to international co-operation and 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing legal and international cooperation aspects related to drug-related offenses, extradition, confiscation, and mutual legal assistance. It seems to be focused on the implementation of international agreements and conventions, rather than specific economic, environmental, or social issues.

**Category**
Law enforcement, International cooperation