16. By its resolution 1985/10 of 26 February 1985. entitled 'rmprenentation of thernternationar convention on the suppression and punishnent of lhe crime otApartheidn l/ the connission on Human Rights took note ,ith appreciation of ihereport ot the Group of Three, and in particular the conclusions and reconnendationscontained thereini reco ndnded once again that arl, states parties should take fullaccount of the general guiderines laid down by the croup of rhree in tg?g for thesubnission of reportsi dree the attengi,on of arl staces !o the opinion expressed bythe Group j.n its report, that article III of the Coneention could apply to theactj.ons of transnational corporations operating in south Afr j.ca,. dree the atlen!ionof the states parties to the desirability of disseninating turther infornatton ontbe Convention, tbe implenentalion of lts provisions and the work of the Group ofThreei requested the s ec r etary-cenera 1 once nore to invite states parties to theConveniion to express their viees on the extent and the nature of Cheresponsibility of transnational corporations for the continued existence of, thesystem of aparcheid in south Africai requested the croup to continue, in che lightof the vielrs expressed by states parlies, the exaninalion of che extent and thenature of the responsibility of transnational corporations for the continuedexistence of the system of apartheid in South Af,rica, including legal actions thatmight be laken under the convention against transnational corporations uboseoperations in soutb Africa carne under t.he crime of apartheid, and !o report to the cortmissj.on aL its forty-second sessioni and decided that the Group of rhree shourdmeet for a period of not nore tban five days before the forty-second seasion of theconnission to consider che reports sutxnitted by states parties in accordance witharticle VfI of the Convention. I7, In accordance trith article IX ot the Convention and ceneral Assernblyresolution 3l/80. the Chairnan of the Comrni.ssj.on at its forty-first sessionappointed the representatives ot lhe Gernan Denocratic Republic, Nicaragua andSenegal as members of the Group of Tbree. 18. rn noles verbares daled 6 May 1985, the secretary-ceneral brought t.o r.tleatcention of the states part.ies the relevant provisions of che convenlion andConnission resolution 19S5,/10 as oell as the conclusions and recomnendations of che^/ 40 /606 Engli sh Page 5 Group of Three in the report on its 1985 session' and requested them to subrnit theii reports within the time-Iinits indicated in Cornnission resolution ? (XXXIV) of 22 February 1978 for transmission to the Group of Three at its 1986 session' 19. In another note, also dated 6 May 1985, the secr etary-Gener aI brought to the
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing a United Nations resolution related to the suppression and punishment of apartheid, specifically the role of transnational corporations in perpetuating the system of apartheid in South Africa. The text mentions the Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid, which suggests that the topic is related to human rights and international law. The resolution also requests states parties to submit reports on the actions of transnational corporations and to consider legal actions that may be taken under the convention. Based on this analysis, it is likely that the category is related to human rights or international law.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International law