the Special Rapporteur all the assistance he might require to accomplish his work successfully. In that connection, the drafters would like expert assistance to be included in the financial implications. Operative paragraph 8 recommended a draft resolution for adoption by the Commission on Human Rights. 94. Since the text and context of the draft resolution had already been discussed in the Sub-Commission she hoped that it could be adopted without a vote. 95. Mr. SAD! drew attention to the third preambular paragraph, and said that, as currently drafted, the text could lend itself to various interpretations. He therefore proposed to delete the words "which may result ••• minorities". 96. The wording of the fourth preambular paragraph needed to be clarified. He suggested the wording "Convinced that the Sub-Commission can best contribute to preventing minority-related conflicts ••• ". 97. He considered that the language of operative paragraph 3 was better suited to the preambular part of the resolution. 98. In reply to a question by Mr. ALFQNSO MARTINEZ, Mr. PACE (Chief, External Relations, Publications and Documentation, Centre for Human Rights) said that the financial implications of draft resolution E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.8/Rev.l would be circulated in document E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/L.l7. The secretariat would present the financial implications orally prior to the vote to enable the Sub-Commission to continue its consideration of the draft resolution. The summary record of the second part of the meeting appears as document E/CN.4/Sub.2/1990/SR.24/Add.l. 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be related to international human rights, specifically the work of the Special Rapporteur and the Commission on Human Rights. The discussion revolves around the adoption of a draft resolution and the financial implications of the resolution, which suggests that the topic is more closely related to human rights and humanitarian aid rather than economic development or industry.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, Human rights