criminal court, while other States would not, and would, for example, continua to prosecute these crimes through their national jurisdictions. 127. The main advantage of the third option is that it would entirely free the establishment of the court from any possib 1: delay in the adoption of the Code, (11) Comnetanco!U~ction Ow.LJ!fi?X~ 128. The draft Code as being developed by the Commission is restricted in application to individuals (draft article 3). The question of extending the scope of the draft Code to Stntes, although discussed, was left open for consideration at a later stage. - 47 -130, The poseibilitp was also discussed of extending jurisdiction to legal entities other than States, at least for certain crimes, uuch as. for example, drug-traffiaking. 130, As to the nature of the aourt*s jurisdiation, there are three possiblo options I (ir an inter.jational criminal court with exclusive jurisdiction) (ii) concurrent juriatliction between an international oriminal court and national courtsr (iii) an international criminal court having only a review competence. Competence to provide legal npinions could also be anvisaged as a complement to any one of these options. 131, In cases of exclusive jurisdiction by the court, indivitWa1 States would refrain from exeraising jurisdiction over the crimes falling under the competence specified for the court. 132. In the option of concurrent jurisdiction between an international criminal court and national courts, a State would choose whether to institute an action before a national court or before the international court. This possibility would detract from the advantages of uniformity of application. Under this option, muans would also have to bd devised to overcome difficulties which might arise if one party wished to initiate an action before a national court and another party wished it brought before the international court. 133. Under the third option, the court would have competence only to
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the establishment of an international criminal court and the jurisdiction it would have over various crimes. The discussion revolves around the scope of the court's jurisdiction, including the possibility of extending it to legal entities other than states, and the relationships between the international court and national courts. The text does not mention any specific economic, environmental, or social issues that would typically fall under the categories of economic development, natural resources and environment, agriculture, forestry and fishing, etc.

**Category**
International trade, Humanitarian aid and relief