1984-1985 was approved in first reading without a vote. 12. Mr. KNOUNKOU (Congo) said that if a vote had been taken on the appropriation his delegation would have abstained. That attitude should not be interpreted, however, as questioning the assistance afforded by UNDRO to countries with which the Congo had excellent relations, but merely as reflecting his Government's dissatisfaction at UNDRO's attitude towards it. Section 23. Human rights 13. Mr. MSELLE (Chairman of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions) said that the Advisory Committee recommended approval of the Secretary-General's estimate for section 23 in the amount of $9,714,300 (A/38/7, para. 23.4). 14. The CHAIRMAN said that the discussion of section 23 in CPC was reflected in paragraphs 336 to 348 of Part II of its report (A/38/38). 15. Mr. TRUSCOTT (Australia) said that his delegation was concerned that in its report CPC recommended the deletion of output (iii) of programme element 2.1. If that recommendation was agreed to, the Working Group on Slavery would effectively be abolished. His delegation believed that, although the work of the Working Group continued to be both important and relevant, the view of CPC suggested that there was some doubt whether the Working Group had been fully effective. As his delegation had said at a previous meeting, the Fifth Committee was under an obligation to examine all aspects of the work of the United Nations to ensure that it was fully effective. In the circumstances, his delegation proposed that the Committee should recommend to the General Assembly that it adopt CPC's recommendations with the qualification that, rather than deleting output (iii) of programme element 2.1, the Commission on Human Rights or its Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities should be requested to 
**Analysis**
This text appears to be discussing the budget and financial decisions of the United Nations, specifically in relation to human rights. The language used is formal and official, suggesting that it is a report or minutes from a meeting of the United Nations. The content focuses on the allocation of funds and the work of various committees and commissions, rather than any specific development or aid programs.

**Category**
Human rights