draft decisions. J~dgements. Wtth rega~d to Afg.hans hvmg abroad, DRAFT DECISION I A recorded vote was taken on draft decision I. In favour: Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Byelorus­ sian Soviet Socialist Republic, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Djibouti, Egypt, France, Gabon, German Democratic Republic, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Jamaica, Morocco, Mozam­ bique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Po­ land, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Uganda, Union of Soviet Socialist Repub­ lics, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zimbabwe. Against: United States of America. Abstaining: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, Germany, Federal Republic of, Iceland, Japan, Papua New Guinea, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Draft decision I was adopted by 42 votes to 1, with 10 abstentions (decision 1986/133). DRAFT DECISION II A recorded vote was taken on draft decision II. In favour: Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Bel­ gium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Fin­ land, France, Gabon, Germany, Federal Republic of, Guinea, Haiti, Iceland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Pana­ ma, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Venezuela, Zaire. Against: Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, German Democratic Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Abstaining: China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Uganda, Yugoslavia, Zimbabwe. Draft decision II was adopted by 30 votes to 3, with 18 abstentions (decision 1986/134 ). DRAFT DECISION III Draft decision III was adopted (decision 1986/135). DRAFT DECISION IV 28. Mr. NENGRAHARY (Observer for Afghani­ stan) said that his delegation continued to hold the view that no valid reason existed to justify an investigation of the human rights situation in Af­ ghanistan. The so-called reports prepared by an individual about whose competence his delegation 
**Analysis**
The text appears to be a record of decisions made by an international organization, likely the United Nations General Assembly, regarding Afghanistan. The decisions seem to be related to human rights and the situation in Afghanistan, with no apparent connection to economic development, natural resources, or industry. The language used is formal and diplomatic, suggesting that the decisions are of a political or humanitarian nature.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, Human rights