8. The fact tbat a person who committed an offence against the peace and security of mankind acted on an order from his Government or a superior cannot serve as grounds for absolving him fron criminal responsi.bility, but can only be considered as a reason for nitigation of punishnent. 9. If a person who committed an offence against the peace and security of mankind acted in accordance with the policy of his State or conducted such a policy, that circumstance should not constitute grounds for anyone anywhere to offer him political asvlum. 10. The Code should ensure the inevitability of the punishnent of persons guilty of offences against the peace and security of mankind. The punishment of such persons should, as a rule, rest with the national judicial organs of the States which r^,ere the victims of those of f ences. 11. The retention of the item entitled "Draft Code of Offences aqainst tbe Peace anrl Security of ltankind" as a major separate item on the agenda of the Sixth Committee will further the speedy elaboration of that irnportant international 1eqa1 instrument, which wilL contribute to the strengthening of universal peace and the security of peoples.
**Analysis**
The text appears to be discussing the legal framework for holding individuals accountable for crimes against humanity, with a focus on the punishment and extradition of perpetrators. The language used suggests that the document is a draft code or law, and the emphasis on international cooperation and the involvement of national judicial organs supports this interpretation.

**Category**
Humanitarian aid and relief, International trade