Journal ofinternational arbitration (Geneva) 6:3:7-76, 1989. Bockstiege1, K.-H. ZuEntstehungsgeschichte, Struktur undGrundentscheidungen desUNCITRAL Mode11gesetzes fUrdieinternationa1e Wirtschafts-Schieds­ gerichtsbarkeit. InUebernahme desUNCITRAL Mode11gesetzes, 1989. p.23-40. Seebookreference below. Boggiano, A.Arbitraje comercia1 internaciona1: laRepublica Argentina yla Ley Mode1o sobreArbitraje Comercia1 Internaciona1 adoptada porlaComision de1asNaciones Unidasparae1Derecho Mercanti1 Internaciona1. Inhis Derecho internaciona1 privado. T.3,sup1emento yapendice. BuenosAires, Depa1ma, 1988.p.303-331. Annexreproduces textofModelLawp.635-645. Borris, C.DieUNCITRAL-Schiedsrege1n inderPraxisdesIran-United States ClaimsTribunal. Jahrbuch fUrdiePraxisderSchiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Heide1berg) 2:3-22, 1988. Boyd,S.M.Bookreview: H.M.Ho1tzmann andJ.E.Neuhaus, Aguidetothe UNCITRAL ModelLawonInternational Commercial Arbitration: legislative history andcommentary. Arbitration journal (NewYork,N.Y.)44:4:51-52, December 1989. SeeA/CN.9/326 underHo1tzmann. Broches, A.Commentary ontheUNCITRAL ModelLawonInternational Commercial Arbitration. InInternational handbook oncommercial arbitration. Deventer, K1uwer LawandTaxation Publishers, 1990. (Supplement 11) p.1-202. Loose-leaf. Bueno-Guzman, C.andG.Herrmann. Ley Mode1o de laCNUDMIsobrearbitraje comercia1 internacional (Viena, 1985):notaintroductoria. Universitas: ciencias juridicas ysocioeconomicas (Bogota) 76:15-42, junio1989. Annexreproduces Spanish version oftheModel Law, p.27-42.A/CN.9/339 English Page15 Croft, C.Australia adoptstheUNCITRAL Model Law. Arbitration international (London) 5:2:189-199, 1989. Appendix reproduces thenewAustralian International Arbitration Act 1974-1989, p.194-199. CruzMiramontes, R.Actualizaci6n delarbitraje comercial enMexico ylaLey Modelo deArbitraje Comercial delaUNCITRAL. Foro(Mexico) 2:1:179-200, 1989. Thiscontribution contains thesummary records oftheIXSimposio dela Academia Mexicana deArbitraje yComercio Internaciona1 (ADACI) onthe DraftUNCITRAL Model Law, held17April1985. Dasser, F. Das UNCITRAL Mode11gesetz von1985.InhisInternationale Schiedsgerichte undlexmercatoria: rechtsvergleichender Beitrag zur Diskussion ubereinnicht-staat1iches Handelsrecht. Zurich, Schu1thess, 1989.p.292-297. (Schweizer Studien zuminternationa1en Recht, Band59) E1-Kosheri, A. S.Egypt. InInternational handbook oncommercial arbitration. Deventer, Kluwer LawandTaxation Publishers, 1990. (Supplement 11)p.1-52. Loose-leaf. Annex 11 reproduces DraftLawoninternational commercial arbitration as circulated bytheMinistry ofJustice, November 1988,p.1-14. Froh1ingsdorf, J.Dasneuespanische GesetzuberSchiedsgerichtsbarkeit. Rechtderinternationa1en Wirtschaft (Heidelberg) 35:9:686-691, September 1989. Thisarticle compares thenewSpanish arbitration statute withthe UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules. Garro,A. M. El arbitraje enAmerica Central ylaLeyModelopropuesta porla Comisi6n delasNaciones Unidasparae1Derecho Mercanti1 Internaciona1 (UNCITRAL). Revista delacorteespanola dearbitraje (Madrid) 4:51-80, 1987. Annexcontains anarticle-by-article comparison oftheModelLawwith arbitration lawsofCostaRica,ElSalvador, Guatemala andHonduras, p.265-290. Goldstajn, A.Choiceofinternational arbitrators, arbitral tribunals and centres: legalandsociological aspects. InP.Sarcevic, ed.Essays on international commercial arbitration. London, Graham&Trotman, 1989. p.27-47. Hamilton, Mr.Justice. Arbitration andthecourts -influence ofthe UNCITRAL Model Law: theIrishscene. Arbitration (London) 55:2:103-106. Thisisapaperdelivered attheChartered Institute's Annual