flriialaeieal 3 6 -3 10. ·c:h•ical 4 .5 •I .,, AadcultU1'al .5 8 -3 16 Physico-~th.atical 6 1 +4 3 Peclqoaic~l T. 9 -2 t2 Biotoaical 8 7 +l 7 Biatoric.d 9 10 •I 13' !cocoaaical 10 3 +7 .Azt Ctiticia II 13 -2 11 Geological-MineraloJical 12 II +I 4 -flt.Ua•opla:lo.J. 13 12 +1. 6 Geoaraphical 14 14 0 14 . Veteriury 1.5 16 -I 18 Law 16 IS +I s Architecture 17 17 0 a Phanzaca"'tics 18 18 0 IS . 394 Professional mobility In science has turned Into ~ •ass phenomenon under cond It tons of sc le"htl flc-teehn1eal progress._ t n accordance with the data of mass surveys of scientific and scientific-pedagogical personnel at acade•lc and branch Institutes and higher educational Institutions. a certain number of the personnel works not·ln conformity with the specialization g~tned at the higher educational ~nstttutton. They even changed not only their specialization but even their profession stated In the diploma on. graduation <see Table No.3). Table No.3 Distribution of Scientific Workers by Degree of Correspondence of Basic Education to Subject Work at Different Types of Scientific Organizations I ---------------------------------~--------------------------------Correspond completely to specia­ lization at higher edu­ cational Institution 2 Do not correspond to narrow specia­ lization at higher educational Insti­ tution b4t corres­ pond to general profession stated In diploma 3 Refer to Do not cor science respond. & with gen-do not eral pro• refer to fesslon adjacent stated In area of diploma science 4 5 -----------------------------------------------------------------Scientific workers of USSR Academy of Sciences I 7. 8 {chemical& physics) Scientific workers of branch scie-ntific res 34.6 earch Ins-titutes (chemlco­ technologlcal profile) Professor teachIng personnel (chairs of 30.5 chemical and cheasl co•tec·hno- log teal prof I Ia) 47.3 29.5 5.4 . 39.8 22.4 3.6 56.3 9.5 3.7 -------------------------------------------------------------------