accordance wlth tlrose provis lons of the Crharter havlng rlagaral to the power to veto, j.t rnlght not be lncon- ce lvable for the permanent rembe rs of the Securlty Councll to take actlon. perhaps ln a less formal_ lnanner to brlng about a sltrratlon where the states concernedA/ 40/726 English Page 69 could be brought about to accept the resolutions pertaining to the issues. fn regard to the econorni-c matters which depend as ;mrch on the changing economic factors in the context of interdependence cf nations as the politlca]. w111, the United l{ations could perhaps be 3ctiv:.sed a bit more readil? as fjle negotiating fo rum on the basis of adequate preparatory i{ork and tJre proeedures conducive to a meaninqful dialogue. This is an atea 'rthere rationa- Iisatlon of the procedure of the Organization itself might beeome an important and relevant factor which rvould be dlscussed beLow. x\rrning now to the question of. r rtional-trsaiion ln tlae working of the General Assenbly, the focus of attention needs to be placed on two principal. objectj-ves, nanely, t}la! the tl.ne of the General Assembly is utilised for dissussion of essential lssues and secondly, that ttre adoption of resolutions is proceed with a manne r that would facilital-,e and be cor'ducive to thej-r irqrlementation. It may be stated at the outset in this connecticn that .even wltJr the best polit5-cal will, many governments esFeclally 1n ttre developing wor1d, find it well-nigh lmpossible to keep track of the voluminous resolutions and !o s tudy them in an adequate fashion which is an essential. pre-requisite to their lmplenentation- Tlxe resolutions ln ttreir final form, as adoPted by the General Assembly, are usually made available In tl:e rrb:rtl|l. of January and $rlthln a period of nLne nrcnt]rs ur.tiL ttre collK€ncement of the next sesslon it becomes