draft decisions. J~dgements. Wtth rega~d to Afg.hans hvmg abroad, DRAFT DECISION I A recorded vote was taken on draft decision I. In favour: Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Byelorus­ sian Soviet Socialist Republic, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Djibouti, Egypt, France, Gabon, German Democratic Republic, Guinea, Guyana, Haiti, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Italy, Jamaica, Morocco, Mozam­ bique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Panama, Philippines, Po­ land, Romania, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Turkey, Uganda, Union of Soviet Socialist Repub­ lics, Venezuela, Yugoslavia, Zaire, Zimbabwe. Against: United States of America. Abstaining: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, Germany, Federal Republic of, Iceland, Japan, Papua New Guinea, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. Draft decision I was adopted by 42 votes to 1, with 10 abstentions (decision 1986/133). DRAFT DECISION II A recorded vote was taken on draft decision II. In favour: Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Bel­ gium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Fin­ land, France, Gabon, Germany, Federal Republic of, Guinea, Haiti, Iceland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Pana­ ma, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Spain, Sweden, Turkey, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Venezuela, Zaire. Against: Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, German Democratic Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Abstaining: China, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Rwanda, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Uganda, Yugoslavia, Zimbabwe. Draft decision II was adopted by 30 votes to 3, with 18 abstentions (decision 1986/134 ). DRAFT DECISION III Draft decision III was adopted (decision 1986/135). DRAFT DECISION IV 28. Mr. NENGRAHARY (Observer for Afghani­ stan) said that his delegation continued to hold the view that no valid reason existed to justify an investigation of the human rights situation in Af­ ghanistan. The so-called reports prepared by an individual about whose competence his delegation 