cf Justlce by reascu of the fact thet if the laxtl€s aglee cn the diEpute bei!6 settled by ar ad hoc Cha.Bber nd.er the Statute and the Rules of the Cor:rt, the parties thensclves would have a clea! voic€ i.Ir the congtlhrtion of the gbaJxber. In tb€ natter of ccrastltution of ad hoc tribt:rra.1s, it is geneaally the case ttrat a thlrd of the nunber of nembels be noni.:Leted by each of ttre partles, ntri.Lst the r€Eai-ai.ng nurnber a.re tc be appoi-nted by a€r€enent of poftiesr failill€ nleich by a designated authori ty. Tbe appoiatruent of 'treutraJ. nexrbexs " has at tiraes presented problgns leading to delay jlt c ornnenci ng or continuaticn cf pmceed5.n6s. On the ottr€! hgrdr f a Chanber cf the Ccr'lrt is proferg!€d, the 4pobtnent of the nenbors wc,rfld be gove4ed by epecific rrles, uhich utdle aLlowjJ€ a sufficiqrt say to the Partiest would €cxsrrl€ ccnstLttrticn of a Cha.Eber $i thcut delay. Even thou€b the cboice is to be nade out of the fifteen Judgeg constitutiag the Court r it is to be noted that they hava al1 been selected by an elective process tc ensure their erniaencer integrit-yA/ 40/ 682 Enq 1i sh Page 28 and :.opartlat:ty41 . Ia faot j.a two leceot cases tbe ad hoc tri.b8ats tlar9T' been constituted. 1{j.th tl]e sitti:rg judges of tbe Court. (ii) Rr:Leg of procedrr€ one of the natters ririch has prcved to be tioe consu4iilg i:r ad boo pmoedures is for the Eelrbels of tha Courb aad the par+ies to rea^h agEe€rrEnt on the pmcetlu:al ed EubstaAtive nrles to be apglied ia ttre proceedia6s. In oae case there the parties had ag::eed upon the applicatlon of the IINCIIRAI Arbitlatton Rules, vtrich aa€ p"r 'n?'.+1y neaat for al4illcatlon i.D' co@€lcl.al Eattels,