" security as surances " by th.-4"glu."Ly99!+++*ffiire-Wst " o*;*'"'-ll-:g: l. "Complete prohibition and total destruction of nuclear weapons are essential for the elinination ""'"f "tt var and nuclear threats ' I"Ie are avare that its realization is no easy *^it.r. This being the cases we hold that the nuclear- veapon States should at least undertake not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against tne non- nucleat-lleapon States and nuclear-free zones' on its oxn initiative and unilat era1iyl"int"" iong tgo declared that at no time and in no circumstances voutd it li-tltu-iit"t to usE nuclear reapons .'' (cD/133) Lre!,"9 2, "To negotiate 1,Iith nucfear-free zones participants in order to contract effective and binding "orrii*.r,t", as approlriate, precruding any u:e or threat of use of nuclear lreapons ;;;;;t trt" stut"t oi tnt"" zones"' (cD/139) S_orf i.e_t, IJg!-o1 3" "To offer a binding conmitment in.a new internaticnal convention not to use or threaten to use nucliat tuapo"" against non-nuclear States parties to such a convention which renoun;"- trr" p"oao"tion and acquisition of nuclear.veapons and r^rhich have no nucrear *;;n;;; i"-in"r" territorj or under their jurisd.iction or control and to consult "ii""".r"."u party to.th"e convention has reason to believe that the actions o, *"y"iinlt';";l; ;r." in vioration af this conmitmentl" )+. "The Soviet Union, for its part" ishes to state as emphatically a's it can thatN.eareagainsttheuseofnuclearweapons,thatonlyextraold'inary circumstances, only aggression against our countly or its a}lies by anot'her nuclear Power, could compel us to have recourse tt trrat extreme means of serf_defence. rrre sovrei union is doing and wi* d.o aL1 in its Fower to prevent the outbTeak or * .,o"r.li ;;;*;ra to pr;tect the peoples frorn becorLing the victims of nucfear strikes" *h;;;t;r";;;ti-o'"- ttttriato"i" 'tni" is our steadfast policv' and we shall acl in accordance \"/l Lh 1l'