Conference, 22and24September 1988.Seealsoreportofdiscussion on thispaper,p.106-107, 152. Herrmann, G.Aktueller StandderRezeption desMode1lgesetzes. InUebernahme desUNCITRAL Modellgesetzes, 1989.p.17-22. Seebookreference below.A/CN.9/339 English Page16 _____International commercial dispute settlement -alternative methods: UNCITRAL Conciliation andArbitration Rules. Arbitration (London) 55:2:85-91, May1989. Thisisapaperdelivered attheChartered Institute's Annual Conference, 22and24September 1988. Seealsoreportofdiscussion on thispaper,p.95-96. Overcoming regional differences: arbitral practice, comparative lawand theapproximation oflaws.InP.Sanders,~. International Arbitration Congress (9th:1988:Tokyo,Japan). Arbitration insettlement of international commercial disputes involving theFarEastandarbitration in combined transportation. Deventer, Kluwer, 1989.p.291-299. (ICCA congress series; no.4) TheUNCITRAL ModelLawonInternational Commercial Arbitration: introduction andgeneral provisions. InP.Sarcevic, ed.Essays on international commercial arbitration. London, Graham&Trotman, 1989. p.3-26. Houtte, H.van.Conduct ofarbitral proceedings. Essays oninternational commercial arbitration. 1989.p.113-128.InP.Sarcevic, ~. London, Graham&Trotman, Knoepfler, F.andP.Schweizer. Makingofawards andtermination of proceedings. InP.Sarcevic, ed.Essays oninternational commercial arbitration. London, Graham&Trotman, 1989.p.160-176. Kornblum, U.ZurUebernahme desUNCITRAL-Modellgesetzes liberdie internationale Handelsschiedsgerichtsbarkeit indasdeutsche Schieds­ verfahrensrecht. Jahrbuch flirdiePraxisderSchiedsgerichtsbarkeit (Heidelberg) 1:34-46, 1987. Kos-Rabcewicz-Zubkowski, L. AreviewoftherecentCanadian adoption ofthe UNCITRAL ModelLawonInternational Commercial Arbitration. University of MiamiInter-American lawreview(CoralGables, Florida) 19:3:731-740, spring 1988. _____L'adaptation delaloi-type delaCNUDCIdanslesprovinces deCommon LawauCanada. Revue de l'arbitrage (Paris) 1:37-42, janvier-mars 1989. Lando, O. The lawapplicable tothemeritsofthedispute. InP.Sarcevic, ed.Essays oninternational commercial arbitration. London, Graham& Trotman, 1989.p.129-159. Lew,J.D.M. Arbitration agreements: formandcharacter. InP.Sarcevic, ed.Essays oninternational commercial arbitration. London, Graham& Trotman, 1989.p.51-63. Lionnet, K.ZieldesModellgesetzes. InUebernahme desUNCITRAL Modell­ gesetzes, 1989.p.11-15. Seebookreference below. Madl,F.Competence ofarbitral tribunals ininternational commercial arbitration. InP.Sarcevic,~. Essays oninternational commercial arbitration. London, Graham&Trotman, 1989.p.92-112. Mustil1, LordJustice. Domestic arbitration law:proposals forconsolidation amendment anddevelopment. Arbitration (London) 56:2:82-88, May1990.A/CN.9/339 English Page17 Najar,J.-C.andM.Po1kinghorne. Australia's adoption oftheUNCITRAL Model Law.International arbitration report (Wayne, Pennsylvania) 4:3:21-32, March1989. Noecker, T.Gesetzgebungstechnische Aspekte beieinerUebernahme des UNCITRAL-Mode11gesetzes. Rechtderinternationa1en Wirtschaft (Heide1berg) 36:1:28-31, Januar1990. _____DasRechtderSchiedsgerichtsbarkeit inKanada. Heide1berg, Ver1ag RechtundWirtschaft, 1988. 279p.(Abhand1ungen zurnRechtder Internationa1en Wirtschaft, Band10)(Dissertation, Universitat MUnster, 1988) Annexcontains legaltextsonCanadian commercial arbitration, and UNCITRAL Model Law. p.217-255. Oyekun1e, T. The Federal Republic ofNigeria. InInternational handbook on commercial arbitration. Deventer, K1uwer LawandTaxation Publishers, 1990. (Supplement 11)p.1-24. Loose-leaf. Annex I reproduces Arbitration andConciliation Decree 1988(Decree No.11,14March1988),p.1-35.