2E._ _rn_vLew of the above, there are strong doubts that rcsc has acted under Artlcle. 1l(c) correctly. To,beSin wtth, tte icic-a""i"r"" 1€ e contradrctory one: the comni.€ston declded (i) "to tncreaee the nen iork p."t .a.1""ii."i-ty, 9.6 per centrr after codparl.ng lt not to Unftea Siaiee Federal Ctvll Servlce, but to other duty etatrone' and iheo rrrl-ir.l-"ii..-Jui| "..aao.," ehould be co,npared to New York, an actlon *htch.led to the adjustmerri-oi in" fna"*. Therefore,the IDspectore belleve thet lf.Artlcle Lff"l *"i.-.ppfied correctly, the posradjustmente of other dutv statlon6 should have leen'Loir"ctea agalnst New york,s,after Net{ Yorkrs had been eettled by corpeirtson "iit -ii. comparator eervice. B. $ldenlng of the narRln 29. It should be recalled that the Noblemaire princlpie provlded for a level of €alerie€ for international clvll aervants based on 'tte irtgfreet paid natlonal civil Bervice vrlth the fector of expatrlatlon a"""oi.uiy EaKef! ,.nto accouot.Thls means that the levere of,ealari"" ii-i.al-"I.iil."-"n."ra correspond or be equal. Nevertheleas, in 1972 the Special Conmltt.u'oi s"f""y Revlew by virtue :fr:al:,0::9:rlnantly exparrlete character of ljnited Nations service,, recounended a r) per cent lncrease ln renuneration on the United Natlons sider rrhlch it called I'excesslverr, Although the ceneral a""".liy-"t-tf,ut tilne took note of I0l Al39l30, para. 163. ll/ Ibld., para. 165. -9- thls r ecomrnend at lon ' rt vas understood.' 6nd- the Assernbll ::{tTi":":n:"::':T;**:il: i;1il"::;ii"'.t"1giizl";;-.i;;-'i"' the narsin.n:9 o:'l.i: :li..o:::'.":::*:'::.::J;i"':ilii'.i'ti'i,"''""ii.'' ii'" r""p':"i: l'r1:I: :.li:^::.t1":t::"::iloiii"il"iii.' iiiS=^"'""'iti"' ""oi"iion sr/r41'should be read wherebv the Assemblv :":i;";'.il;;";-;"t ai;. when the rcsc conardered "':"::11:.i:t1:" ::",,:::::"*t:i:'.\:"i;'"t;;";"i".;;.;;-;""r,."tto" to the.cenerar-i:":1!11,::'-:t-::.g,::: #":;;;";-;:ii.;-;;;-;;;";;arv between se6sron6 or the Assembrv iiflpar ator clv1l servlce,.. of po6t adlu6tment syatem"app?opt i.t. d""rtc lteelf nlthln oper atioo (emphasie added ). 30. Hoeever, the lcsc readlng-of thls resolutlon 1::,tll:"":1::ii::t;".H:l?"', been rlout and out pragnatletatt 12/, the CoflflIaaloo ueeo approach to the tnargln ana took:a- iectaton on 9'6 pet cent increase of po€t ll1""ir""a-t.r-nl"- i"it, the baee clty. Thus, insread of, preventlng or ;.i;il;";-i.- .o "t" 6.r,..ui l"".ruiy, 1t 'tiened. the. mergln, even bv lts own