text:
Massachusetts Bay Colony
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Massachusetts Bay Colony
Colony of England
1628–1686
1689–1691 →
Flag First Colonial Seal
A map depicting various colonial territorial claims related to Massachusetts
Capital Salem, Charlestown, Boston
History
• Established Land grant issued, 1628; Royal charter issued, 1629
• Revocation of royal charter 1684
• Dominion of New England established 1686
• Dominion dissolved 1689
• Royal charter issued for Province of Massachusetts Bay 1691
• Disestablished Province of Massachusetts Bay governance begins, 1692
Today part of United States
Massachusetts
Maine
The Massachusetts Bay Colony (1628–1691) was an English settlement on the east coast of North America in the 17th century around the Massachusetts Bay, the northernmost of the several colonies later reorganized as the Province of Massachusetts Bay. The lands of the settlement were located in central New England in what is now Massachusetts, with initial settlements situated on two natural harbors and surrounding land, about 15.4 miles (24.8 km) apart[1]—the areas around the present-day cities of Salem and Boston.
The territory nominally administered by the colony included much of present-day central New England, including portions of the U.S. states of Massachusetts, Maine, New Hampshire, and Connecticut. Territory claimed but never administered by the colonial government extended as far west as the Pacific Ocean. The earlier Dutch colony of New Netherlands disputed many of these claims, arguing that they held rights to lands beyond Rhode Island up to the western side of Cape Cod and the Plymouth Bay Colony.
The Massachusetts Bay Colony was founded by the owners of the Massachusetts Bay Company, which included investors in the failed Dorchester Company that had established a short-lived settlement on Cape Ann in 1623. The colony began in 1628 and was the company's second attempt at colonization. It was successful, with about 20,000 people migrating to New England in the 1630s. The population was strongly Puritan, and its governance was dominated by a small group of leaders who were strongly influenced by Puritan religious leaders. Its governors were elected, and the electorate were limited to freemen who had been examined for their religious views and formally admitted to the local church. As a consequence, the colonial leadership exhibited intolerance to other religious views, including Anglican, Quaker, and Baptist theologies.
The colonists initially had good relationships with the local Indian populations, but frictions developed that ultimately led to the Pequot War (1636–38) and then to King Philip's War (1675–78), after which most of the Indians in southern New England made peace treaties with the colonists (apart from the Pequot tribe, whose survivors largely merged with the Narragansett and Mohegan tribes after the Pequot War).
The colony was economically successful, engaging in trade with England and the West Indies. A shortage of hard currency in the colony prompted it to establish a mint in 1652. Political differences with England after the English Restoration led to the revocation of the colonial charter in 1684. King James II established the Dominion of New England in 1686 to bring all of the New England colonies under firmer crown control. The dominion collapsed after the Glorious Revolution of 1688 deposed James, and the colony reverted to rule under the revoked charter until the charter for the Province of Massachusetts Bay was issued in 1691, which combined the Massachusetts Bay territories with those of the Plymouth Colony and proprietary holdings on Nantucket and Martha's Vineyard. Sir William Phips arrived in 1692 bearing the charter and formally took charge of the new province. The political and economic dominance of New England by the modern state of Massachusetts was made possible in part by the early dominance in these spheres by the Massachusetts Bay colonists.
Contents
[hide]
1 History
1.1 Background
1.1.1 Early settlements
1.1.2 Plymouth Colony
1.1.3 Cape Ann settlement
1.2 Legal formation of the colony
1.3 Colonial history
1.4 Revocation of charter
1.5 Unifications and restoration
2 Life
2.1 Marriage and family life
3 Government
3.1 Laws and judiciary
3.2 Notable criminal prosecutions
3.3 New England Confederation
4 Economy and trade
5 Demographics
6 Geography
6.1 Boundaries
6.2 Timeline of settlement
7 See also
8 References
9 Bibliography
9.1 Online primary sources
10 External links
History[edit]
Background[edit]
Early settlements[edit]
Map depicting tribal distribution in southern New England, circa 1600; the political boundaries shown are modern.
Prior to the arrival of Europeans on the eastern shore of New England, the area around Massachusetts Bay was the territory of several Algonquian-speaking tribes, including the Massachusett, Nauset, and Wampanoag. The Pennacooks occupied the Merrimack River valley to the north, and the Nipmuc, Pocumtuc, and Mahican occupied the western lands of present-day Massachusetts, although some of those tribes were under tribute to the Mohawks, who were expanding aggressively from present-day upstate New York.[2] The total Indian population in 1620 has been estimated to be 7,000[3] with the population of New England at 15–18,000.[4] This number was significantly larger as late as 1616; in later years, contemporary chroniclers interviewed Indians who described a major pestilence that killed between one- and two-thirds of the population. The land-use patterns of the natives included plots cleared for agricultural purposes, and woodland territories for the hunting of game. Land divisions between the tribes were well understood.[3]
During the early 17th century, several European explorers charted the area, including Samuel de Champlain and John Smith.[5] Plans began in 1606 for the first permanent British settlements on the east coast of North America. On April 10, 1606, King James I of England (James VI of Scotland) granted a charter forming two joint-stock companies. Neither of these corporations was given a name by this charter, but the territories were named as the "first Colony" (fourth paragraph of charter) and "second Colony" (fifth paragraph of charter), over which they were respectively authorized to settle and to govern. Under this charter, the "first Colony" and the "second Colony" were to be ruled by a "Council" composed of 13 individuals in each colony. The charter provided for an additional council of 13 persons to have overarching responsibility for the combined enterprise. No name was given to either the company or council governing the respective colonies; the council governing the whole was named "Council of Virginia."[6]
The "first Colony" ranged from the 34th- to 41st-degree latitude north; the "second Colony" ranged from the 38th- to 45th-degree latitude. (Note that the "first Colony" and the "second Colony" overlapped. The 1629 charter of Charles I asserted that the second Colony ranged from 40th to 48th degrees north latitude, which reduces the overlap.) The investors appointed to govern over any settlements in the "first Colony" were from London; the investors appointed to govern over any settlements in the "second Colony" were from the "Town of Plimouth in the County of Devon."[citation needed] The London Company proceeded to establish Jamestown.[7] The Plymouth Company under the guidance of Sir Ferdinando Gorges covered the more northern area, including present-day New England, and established the Sagadahoc Colony in 1607 in present-day Maine.[8] The experience proved exceptionally difficult for the 120 settlers, however, and the surviving colonists abandoned the colony after only one year.[9] Gorges noted that "there was no more speech of settling plantations in those parts" for a number of years.[10] English ships continued to come to the New England area for fishing and trade with the Indians.[11]
Plymouth Colony[edit]
In December 1620, a group of Pilgrims established Plymouth Colony just to the south of Massachusetts Bay, seeking to preserve their cultural identity and attain religious independence.[12] Plymouth's colonists faced great hardships and earned few profits for their investors, who sold their interests to the settlers in 1627.[13] Edward Winslow and William Bradford, two of its leaders, were likely authors of a work published in England in 1622 called Mourt's Relation. This book in some ways resembles a promotional tract intended to encourage further migration.[14] There were other short-lived colonial settlements in 1623 and 1624 at present-day Weymouth, Massachusetts; the Wessagusset Colony of Thomas Weston and an effort by Robert Gorges to establish an overarching colonial structure both failed.[15][16]
Cape Ann settlement[edit]
In 1623, the Plymouth Council for New England (successor to the Plymouth Company) established a small fishing village at Cape Ann under the supervision of the Dorchester Company, with Thomas Gardner as its overseer. This company was originally organized through the efforts of Puritan minister John White (1575–1648) of Dorchester, in the English county of Dorset. White has been called "the father of the Massachusetts Colony" because of his influence in establishing this settlement and despite the fact that he never emigrated.[17] The Cape Ann settlement was not profitable, and the financial backers of the Dorchester Company terminated their support by the end of 1625. Their settlement was abandoned at present-day Gloucester, but a few settlers remained in the area, including Roger Conant, establishing a settlement a little further south, near the village of the Naumkeag tribe.[18]
Legal formation of the colony[edit]
Archbishop William Laud was a favorite advisor of King Charles I and a dedicated Anglican, and he sought to suppress the religious practices of Puritans and other nonconforming beliefs in England. The persecution of many Puritans in the 1620s led them to believe that religious reform would not be possible while Charles was king, and many decided to seek a new life in the New World.[19]
John White continued to seek funding for a colony. On 19 March 1627/8,[20] the Council for New England issued a land grant to a new group of investors that included a few holdovers from the Dorchester Company. The land grant was for territory between the Charles and Merrimack Rivers, including a three-mile (4.8 km) buffer to the north of the Merrimack and to the south of the Charles, that extended from "the Atlantick and westerne sea and ocean on the east parte, to the South sea on the west parte."[21] The company to whom the grant was sold was styled "The New England Company for a Plantation in Massachusetts Bay".[22] The company elected Matthew Cradock as its first governor, and immediately began organizing provisions and recruiting settlers.
The company sent approximately 100 new settlers with provisions to join Conant in 1628, led by Governor's Assistant John Endecott, one of the grantees.[23] The next year, Naumkeag was renamed Salem and fortified by another 300 settlers, led by Rev. Francis Higginson, one of the first ministers of the settlement.[24] The first winters were difficult, with colonists struggling against starvation and disease, resulting in numerous deaths.[25][26]
The company leaders sought a Royal Charter for the colony because they were concerned about the legality of conflicting land claims given to several companies (including the New England Company) for the little-known territories of the New World, and because of the increasing number of Puritans who wanted to join the company. Charles granted the new charter on 4 March 1628/9,[27] superseding the land grant and establishing a legal basis for the new English colony at Massachusetts. It was not apparent whether Charles knew that the Company was meant to support the Puritan emigration, and he was likely left to assume that it was purely for business purposes, as was the custom. The charter omitted a significant clause: the location for the annual stockholders' meeting. Charles dissolved Parliament in 1629, whereupon the company's directors met to consider the possibility of moving the company's seat of governance to the colony. This was followed by the Cambridge Agreement later that year, in which a group of investors agreed to emigrate and work to buy out others who would not emigrate.
The Massachusetts Bay Colony became the first English chartered colony whose board of governors did not reside in England. This independence helped the settlers to maintain their Puritan religious practices without interference from the king, Archbishop Laud, or the Anglican Church. The charter remained in force for 55 years; Charles II revoked it in 1684.[28] Parliament had passed legislation collectively called the Navigation Acts which attempted to prevent the colonists from trading with any nation other than England. Colonial resistance to those acts led King Charles to revoke the Massachusetts charter and consolidate all the colonies in New England, New York, and New Jersey into the Dominion of New England.
Colonial history[edit]
A flotilla of ships sailed from England beginning in April 1630, sometimes known as the Winthrop Fleet. The fleet began arriving at Salem in June and carried more than 700 colonists, Governor John Winthrop, and the colonial charter.[29] Winthrop delivered his famous "City upon a Hill" sermon either before or during the voyage.[30]
Detail of sounding board, Old Ship Church (1681), Hingham, Massachusetts, the oldest Puritan meetinghouse in Massachusetts
For the next ten years, there was a steady exodus of Puritans from England, with about 20,000 people emigrating to Massachusetts and the neighboring colonies during the Great Migration.[31] Many ministers reacted to the repressive religious policies of England, making the trip with their congregations, among whom were John Cotton, Roger Williams, Thomas Hooker, and others. Religious divisions and the need for additional land prompted a number of new settlements that resulted in Connecticut Colony (by Hooker) and the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations (by Williams and others). Minister John Wheelwright was banished in the wake of the Antinomian Controversy (like Anne Hutchinson), and he moved north to found Exeter, New Hampshire.
The advent of the Wars of the Three Kingdoms in 1639 brought a halt to major migration, and a significant number of men returned to England to fight in the war. Massachusetts authorities were sympathetic to the Parliamentary cause and had generally positive relationships with the governments of the English Commonwealth and the Protectorate of Oliver Cromwell. The colony's economy began to diversify in the 1640s, as the fur trading, lumber, and fishing industries found markets in Europe and the West Indies, and the colony's shipbuilding industry developed. The growth of a generation of people who were born in the colony and the rise of a merchant class began to slowly change the political and cultural landscape of the colony, even though its governance continued to be dominated by relatively conservative Puritans.
Colonial support for the Commonwealth created tension after the throne was restored to Charles II in 1660. Charles sought to extend royal influence over the colonies, which Massachusetts resisted along with the other colonies. For example, the Massachusetts Bay colony repeatedly refused requests by Charles and his agents to allow the Church of England to become established, and the New England colonies in general resisted the Navigation Acts, laws that restricted colonial trade to England alone.
All of the New England colonies were ravaged by King Philip's War (1675–76), when the Indians of southern New England rose up against the colonists and were decisively defeated, although at great cost in life to all concerned. The Massachusetts frontier was particularly hard hit, with several communities being abandoned in the Connecticut and Swift River valleys. By the end of the war, most of the Indian population of southern New England made peace treaties with the colonists.
Revocation of charter[edit]
Following the English Restoration in 1660, matters of colonial administration drew the king's attention. Massachusetts in particular was reluctant to agree that the king had any sort of authority to control its governance.[32] This led to crises in the 1660s and late 1670s in which steps were first planned, and then executed in England to vacate the colonial charter. The Lords of Trade had decided for a variety of reasons to consolidate the New England colonies; they issued quo warranto writs in 1681 for the charters of several North American colonies, including Massachusetts.[33] The Massachusetts writ was never served for technical reasons, and the charter was not formally vacated until the chancery court issued a scire facias writ formally annulling the charter on June 18, 1684.[34] The proceedings were arranged so that the time had expired for the colonial authorities to defend the charter, before they even learned of the event.[35]
Unifications and restoration[edit]
From 1686, the colony's territory was administratively unified by James II of England with the other New England colonies in the Dominion of New England. The dominion was governed by Sir Edmund Andros without any local representation beyond hand-picked councillors, and was extremely unpopular in New England. Massachusetts authorities conspired to have Andros arrested in April 1689 after the 1688 Glorious Revolution in England, and they reestablished government under the forms of the vacated charter. However, dissenters from the Puritan rule argued that the government lacked a proper constitutional foundation, and some of its actions were resisted on that basis. The years from 1689 to 1692 were also difficult ones, since the colony was at the forefront of King William's War, and its frontier communities were ravaged by attacks organized in New France and conducted by French and Indian raiding parties.
King William III issued a charter in 1691, despite efforts by Massachusetts agents to revive the old colonial charter. It was chiefly negotiated by Increase Mather in his role as the colony's ambassador-extraordinary,[36] unifying Massachusetts Bay with Plymouth Colony, Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, and territories that roughly encompass present-day Maine, New Brunswick, and Nova Scotia to form the Province of Massachusetts Bay. This new charter additionally extended voting rights to non-Puritans, an outcome that Mather had tried to avoid.[37]
Life[edit]
Part of a series on
Puritans
Background[show]
Christianity
Protestantism
Reformation
English Reformation
Calvinism
Anglicanism
Arminianism
Arminianism in the Church of England
English Dissenters
Independents
Nonconformism
English Presbyterianism
Ecclesiastical separatism
17th-century denominations in England
Crucial themes[show]
Definitions of Puritanism
Impropriation
Puritan Sabbatarianism
Millennialism
Puritan choir
Puritan work ethic
Merton thesis
History[show]
under Queen Elizabeth I
under King James I
under King Charles I
Cromwellian era and after
in North America
England[show]
Scrooby Congregation
Trial of Archbishop Laud
Marian exiles
Vestments controversy
Martin Marprelate
Millenary Petition
Grand Remonstrance
English Civil War
English Restoration
Act of Uniformity 1662
Great Ejection
Westminster Confession of Faith
Elizabethan Religious Settlement
America[show]
Providence Island Company
Massachusetts Bay Colony
Salem witch trials
immigration to New England
culture in New England
Christmas prohibition
American exceptionalism
Elsewhere[show]
Troubles at Frankfurt
Notable individuals[show]
Peter Bulkley
John Bunyan
William Bradford
Anne Bradstreet
John Cotton
Oliver Cromwell
John Endecott
Jonathan Edwards
Anne Hutchinson
Cotton Mather
Increase Mather
James Noyes
Thomas Parker
Roger Williams
John Winthrop
Robert Woodford
Works[show]
The Godly Man's Picture
The Pilgrim's Progress
Paradise Lost
Foxe's Book of Martyrs
Continuing movements[show]
Congregational churches (U.S.)
other Reformed churches
Reformed Baptists
Nondenominational Protestants
Unitarian Universalism
v
t
e
Life could be quite difficult in the early years of the colony. Many colonists lived in fairly crude structures, including dugouts, wigwams, and dirt-floor huts made using wattle and daub construction. Construction improved in later years, and houses began to be sheathed in clapboard, with thatch or plank roofs and wooden chimneys.[38] Wealthier individuals would extend their house by adding a leanto on the back, which allowed a larger kitchen (possibly with a brick or stone chimney including an oven), additional rooms, and a sleeping loft. These houses were the precursors to what is now called the saltbox style of architecture.[39] Interiors became more elaborate in later years, with plaster walls, wainscoting, and potentially expensive turned woodwork in the most expensive homes.[40]
Colonists arriving after the first wave found that the early towns did not have room for them. Seeking land of their own, groups of families would petition the government for land on which to establish a new town; the government would typically allow the group's leaders to select the land. These grants were typically about 40 square miles (10,000 ha), and were located sufficiently near other towns to facilitate defense and social support. The group leaders would also be responsible for acquiring native title to the lands that they selected.[41] By this means, the colony expanded into the interior, spawning settlements in adjacent territories as well.[42]
The land within a town would be divided by communal agreement, usually allocating by methods that originated in England. Outside a town center, land would be allocated for farming, some of which might be held communally. Farmers with large plots of land might build a house near their properties on the outskirts of the town.[43] A town center that was well laid out would be fairly compact, with a tavern, school, possibly some small shops, and a meeting house that was used for civic and religious functions.[40] The meeting house would be the center of the town's political and religious life. Church services might be held for several hours on Wednesday and all day Sunday. Puritans did not observe annual holidays, especially Christmas, which they said had pagan roots. Annual town meetings would be held at the meeting house, generally in May, to elect the town's representatives to the general court and to transact other community business. Towns often had a village green, used for outdoor celebrations and activities such as military exercises of the town's trainband or militia.
Marriage and family life[edit]
Many of the early colonists who migrated from England came with some or all of their family.[44] It was expected that individuals would marry fairly young and begin producing offspring. Infant mortality rates were comparatively low, as were instances of childhood death.[45] Men who lost their wives often remarried fairly quickly, especially if they had children needing care. Older widows would also sometimes marry for financial security. It was also normal for older widowed parents to live with one of their children. Due to the Puritan perception of marriage as a civil union, divorce did sometimes occur and could be pursued by both genders.[46]
Sexual activity was expected to be confined to marriage. Sex outside of marriage was considered fornication if neither partner was married, and adultery if one or both were married to someone else. Fornication was generally punished by fines and pressure to marry; a woman who gave birth to an illegitimate child could also be fined. Adultery and rape were more serious crimes, and both were punishable by death. Rape, however, required more than one witness, and was therefore rarely prosecuted. Sexual activity between men was called sodomy, and was also punishable by death.[47]
Within the marriage, the husband was typically responsible for supplying the family's financial needs, although it was not uncommon for women to work in the fields and to perform some sort of home labor (for example, spinning thread or weaving cloth) to supplement the family income. Women were almost exclusively responsible for seeing to the welfare of the children.
Children were baptized at the local meeting house within a week of being born. The mother was usually not present because she was still recovering from the birth, and the child's name was usually chosen by the father. Names were propagated within the family, and names would be reused when infants died. If an adult died without issue, his (or her) name could be carried on when the siblings of the deceased named children in his memory.
Most children received some form of schooling, something which the colony's founders believed to be important for forming a proper relationship with God. Towns were obligated to provide education for their children, which was usually satisfied by hiring a teacher of some sort. The quality of these instructors varied, from minimally educated local people to Harvard-educated ministers.
Government[edit]
The structure of the colonial government changed over the lifetime of the charter. The colonial charter was designed for the management of a corporation, and the needs of the colonial government did not always fit well into this model. The result was that the government began with a corporate organization that included a governor and deputy governor, a general court of its shareholders (known as "freemen"), and a council of assistants similar to a board of directors.[48] It ended with a governor and deputy governor, a bicameral legislature that included a representative lower house, and a body of freemen, a subset of the colony's adult inhabitants who were authorized to vote in elections. The council of assistants sat as the upper house of the legislature and served as the judicial court of last appeal.
Massachusetts Bay Colony, 300th Anniversary Issue of 1930
The charter granted the general court the authority to elect officers and to make laws for the colony. Its first meeting in America was held in October 1630, but it was attended by only eight freemen.[48] They formed the first council of assistants, and voted (contrary to the terms of the charter) that the governor and deputy should be elected by them, from their number.[49] This was modified in the next session of the general court, in which the governor and deputy were to be elected by the general court.[50]
An additional 116 settlers were admitted to the general court as freemen in 1631, but most of the governing power, as well as the judicial power, remained with the council of assistants.[51] They also enacted a law specifying that only those men who "are members of some of the churches" in the colony were eligible to become freemen and gain the vote.[49] This restriction on the franchise was not liberalized until after the English Restoration.[50] The process by which individuals became members of one of the colony's churches involved a detailed questioning by the church elders of their beliefs and religious experiences; as a result, only individuals whose religious views accorded with those of the church leadership were likely to become members and gain the ability to vote in the colony.[52] After a protest over the imposition of taxes by a meeting of the council of assistants, the general court ordered each town to send two representatives, known as deputies, to meet with the court to discuss matters of taxation.[53]
Questions of governance and representation arose again in 1634, when several deputies demanded to see the charter, which the assistants had kept hidden from public view. The deputies learned of the provisions that the general court should make all laws, and that all freemen should be members of the general court. They then demanded that the charter be enforced to the letter, which Governor Winthrop pointed out was impractical given the growing number of freemen. The parties reached a compromise, and agreed that the general court would be made up of two deputies elected by each town.[53] The 1634 election resulted in the election of Dudley as governor, and the general court proceeded to reserve for itself a large number of powers, including those of taxation, distribution of land, and the admission of freemen.[54]
The transformation was complete: a trading company had become a (somewhat) representative democracy. A legal case in 1642 brought about the separation of the council of assistants into an upper house of the general court. The case involved a widow's lost pig and had been overturned by the general court; but the assistants had sat in judicial decision on the case and voted as a body to veto the general court's act.[55] The consequence of the ensuing debate was that the general court voted in 1644 that the council of assistants would sit and deliberate separately from the general court (they had sat together until then), the concurrence of both bodies being required for the passage of legislation. Judicial appeals were to be decided by a joint session, since otherwise the assistants would be in the position to veto attempts to overturn their own decisions.[56] A group of emigrants had bought all the Massachusetts Bay Company's stock and brought the Charter to America in 1630; neither the English king nor Parliament nor an English company exerted any influence in Massachusetts Bay Colony.[57] So it was in effect a self-ruling republic for some decades, also practicing separation of powers.
Laws and judiciary[edit]
In 1641, the colony formally adopted the Massachusetts Body of Liberties,[58] written or compiled as its first code of laws by Nathaniel Ward.[59] This document consisted of 100 civil and criminal laws based upon the social sanctions recorded in the Bible.[60] These laws formed the nucleus of colonial legislation until independence, and contained some provisions that were later incorporated into the United States Constitution, such as the ideas of equal protection and double jeopardy.[59]
On the other hand, Massachusetts Bay was the first colony to legalize slavery with provision 91 of the Massachusetts Body of Liberties, which developed protections for people who were unable to perform public service.[61] Another law was developed to protect married women, children, and people with mental disabilities from making financial decisions.[61] Colonial law differentiated among types of mental disabilities, classifying them as "distracted persons," "idiots," and "lunaticks".[61] In 1693, "poor laws" enabled communities to use the estates of people with disabilities to defer the cost of community support of those individuals.[61][62][63] Many of these laws remained until the American Revolution.[61]
Many behaviors were frowned upon culturally which modern sensibilities might consider relatively trivial actions, and some led to criminal prosecution. These included sleeping during church services, playing cards, and engaging in any number of activities on the Sabbath. Conversely, there were laws which reflected attitudes that are still endorsed by popular sensibilities in 21st century America, against things such as smoking tobacco, abusing one's mother-in-law, profane dancing, and pulling hair.[64] Children, newcomers, and people with disabilities were exempt from punishment for such infractions.[61]
The colony's council of assistants sat as the final court of appeal and as the principal court for criminal issues of "life, limb, or banishment" and civil issues where the damages exceeded £100.[60] Lesser offenses were heard in county courts or by commissioners appointed for hearing minor disputes. The lower courts were also responsible for issuing licenses and for matters such as probate. Juries were authorized to decide questions of both fact and law, although the court was able to decide in the event that a jury failed to reach a decision.[65] Sentences for offenses included fines and corporal punishments such as whipping and sitting in the stocks, with the punishments of banishment from the colony and death by hanging being reserved for the most serious offenses.[66] Evidence was sometimes based on hearsay and superstition. For example, the "ordeal of touch" was used in 1646, in which someone accused of murder is forced to touch the dead body; if blood appears, the accused is deemed guilty. This was used to convict and execute a woman accused of murdering her newborn child.[67] Bodies of individuals hanged for piracy were sometimes gibbeted (publicly displayed) on harbor islands visible to seagoing vessels.[68]
Notable criminal prosecutions[edit]
Quaker Mary Dyer led to execution on Boston Common, June 1, 1660; by an unknown 19th century artist
One of the first people to be executed in the colony was Dorothy Talbye, who was apparently delusional. She was hanged in 1638 for murdering her daughter, as the common law of Massachusetts made no distinction at the time between insanity (or mental illness) and criminal behavior.[69] Midwife Margaret Jones was convicted of being a witch and hanged in 1648 after the condition of patients allegedly worsened in her care.[70]
The colonial leadership was the most active in New England in the persecution of Quakers. In 1660, one of the most notable instances was English Quaker Mary Dyer who was hanged in Boston for repeatedly defying a law banning Quakers from the colony.[71] Dyer was one of the four executed Quakers known as the Boston martyrs. Executions ceased in 1661 when King Charles II explicitly forbade Massachusetts from executing anyone for professing Quakerism.[72]
New England Confederation[edit]
In 1643, Massachusetts Bay joined Plymouth Colony, Connecticut Colony, and New Haven Colony in the New England Confederation, a loose coalition organized primarily to coordinate military and administrative matters among the Puritan colonies.[73] It was most active in the 1670s during King Philip's War.[74] (New Hampshire had not yet been organized as a separate province, and both it and Rhode Island were excluded because they were not Puritan.)[75]
Economy and trade[edit]
In the early years, the colony was highly dependent on the import of staples from England and was supported by the investments of a number of wealthy immigrants. Certain businesses were quick to thrive, notably shipbuilding, fisheries, and the fur and lumber trades. As early as 1632, ships built in the colony began trading with other colonies, England, and foreign ports in Europe. By 1660, the colony's merchant fleet was estimated at 200 ships and, by the end of the century, its shipyards were estimated to turn out several hundred ships annually.[76] In the early years, the fleet principally carried fish to destinations from the West Indies to Europe.[77] It was common for a merchant to ship dried fish to Portugal or Spain, pick up wine and oil for transport to England, and then carry finished goods from England or elsewhere back to the colony.[78] This and other patterns of trade became illegal following the introduction of the Navigation Acts in 1651, turning colonial merchants who continued these trading patterns into de facto smugglers. Many colonial authorities were merchants or were politically dependent on them, and they opposed being required by the crown to collect duties imposed by those acts.[79]
The fur trade only played a modest role in the colony's economy because its rivers did not connect its centers well with the Indians who engaged in fur trapping. Timber began to take on an increasingly important role in the economy, especially for naval purposes, after conflicts between England and the Dutch depleted England's supplies of ship masts.[80]
The colony's economy depended on the success of its trade, in part because its land was not as suitable for agriculture as that of other colonies such as Virginia, where large plantations could be established. The fishery was important enough that those involved in it were exempted from taxation and military service.[81] Larger communities supported craftsmen skilled in providing many of the necessities of 17th century life. Some income-producing activities took place in the home, such as carding, spinning, and weaving of wool and other fibers.[82]
Goods were transported to local markets over roads that were sometimes little more than widened Indian trails.[83] Towns were required to maintain their roads, on penalty of fines, and the colony required special town commissions to lay out roads in a more sensible manner in 1639. Bridges were fairly uncommon, since they were expensive to maintain, and fines were imposed on their owners for the loss of life or goods if they failed. Consequently, most river crossings were made by ferry. Notable exceptions were a bridge across the Mystic River constructed in 1638, and another over the Saugus River, whose upkeep costs were subsidized by the colony.[84]
The colonial government attempted to regulate the economy in a number of ways. On several occasions, it passed laws regulating wages and prices of economically important goods and services, but most of these initiatives did not last very long.[85] The trades of shoe-making and coopering (barrel-making) were authorized to form guilds, making it possible to set price, quality, and expertise levels for their work. The colony set standards governing the use of weights and measures. For example, mill operators were required to weigh grain before and after milling, to ensure that the customer received back what he delivered (minus the miller's percentage).[86]
The Puritan dislike of ostentation led the colony to also regulate expenditures on what it perceived as luxury items. Items of personal adornment were frowned upon, such as lace and costly silk outerwear in particular. Attempts to ban these items failed, and the colony resorted to laws restricting their display to those who could demonstrate £200 in assets.[87]
Demographics[edit]
Most of the people who arrived during the first 12 years emigrated from two regions of England. Many of the colonists came from the county of Lincolnshire and East Anglia, northeast of London, and a large group also came from Devon, Somerset, and Dorset in the southwest of England. These areas provided the bulk of the migration, although colonists also came from other regions of England.[88] The pattern of migration often centered around specific Nonconformist clergy who sought to leave England under threat from Archbishop Laud, who encouraged their flock to accompany them.[89] One characteristic unique to the New England colonies (as distinguished from some of the other English colonies) was that most of the immigrants were emigrating for religious and political reasons, rather than economic ones.[90]
The preponderance of the immigrants were well-to-do gentry and skilled craftsmen. They brought with them apprentices and servants, the latter of whom were sometimes in indentured servitude.[91] Few titled nobility emigrated, even though some supported the emigration politically and financially and also acquired land holdings in Massachusetts and other colonies.[92] Merchants also represented a significant proportion of the migrants, often the children of the gentry, and they played an important role in establishing the economy of the colony.[91]
With the start of the English Civil War in 1642, emigration came to a comparative standstill, and some colonists even returned to England to fight for the Parliamentary cause. In the following years, most of the immigrants came for economic reasons; they were merchants, seamen, and skilled craftsmen. Following the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685, the colony also saw in an influx of French Protestant Huguenots. During the period of the charter colony, small numbers of Scots immigrated, but these were assimilated into the colony.[93] The population of Massachusetts remained largely English in character until the 1840s.[94]
Slavery existed but was not widespread within the colony. Some Indians captured in the Pequot War were enslaved, with those posing the greatest threat being transported to the West Indies and exchanged for goods and slaves.[95] Governor John Winthrop owned a few Indian slaves,[96] and Governor Simon Bradstreet owned two black slaves.[97] The Body of Liberties enacted in 1641 included rules governing the treatment and handling of slaves.[98] Bradstreet reported in 1680 that the colony had 100 to 120 slaves, but historian Hugh Thomas documents evidence suggesting that there may have been a somewhat larger number.[99]
Geography[edit]
See also: Geography of Massachusetts
The Massachusetts colony was dominated by its rivers and coastline. Major rivers included the Charles and Merrimack, as well as a portion of the Connecticut River, which has been used to transport furs and timbers to Long Island Sound. Cape Ann juts into the Gulf of Maine, providing harbors for fishermen plying the fishing banks to the east, and Boston's harbor provided secure anchorage for seagoing commercial vessels. Development in Maine was restricted to coastal areas, and large inland areas remained under native control until after King Philip's War, particularly the uplands in what is now Worcester County.
Boundaries[edit]
See also: Northern boundary of Massachusetts
The colonial charter specified that the boundaries were to be from three miles (4.8 km) north of the Merrimack River to three miles south of the southernmost point of the Charles River and thence westward to the "South Sea" (i.e., the Pacific Ocean).[21] At the time, the course of neither of the rivers was known for any significant length, which eventually led to boundary disputes with the colony's neighbors.[100] The colony's claims were large, but the practicalities of the time meant that they never actually controlled any land further west than the Connecticut River valley. The colony also claimed additional lands by conquest and purchase, further extending the territory that it administered.
The southeastern boundary with the Plymouth Colony was first surveyed in 1639 and accepted by both colonies in 1640.[101] It is known in Massachusetts as the "Old Colony Line", and is still visible as the boundary between Norfolk County to the north and Bristol and Plymouth Counties to the south.[102]
The northern boundary was originally thought to be roughly parallel to the latitude of the mouth of the Merrimack River, since the river was assumed to flow primarily west. This was found not to be the case and, in 1652, Governor Endicott sent a survey party to locate the northernmost point on the Merrimack. At the point where the Pemigewasset River, the Merrimack's principal tributary, meets the Winnipesaukee River local Indians guided the party to the outlet of Lake Winnipesaukee, incorrectly claiming that as the Merrimack's source. The survey party carved lettering into a rock there (now called Endicott Rock), and its latitude was taken to be the colony's northern boundary. When extended eastward, this line was found to meet the Atlantic near Casco Bay in present-day Maine.
Following this discovery, the colonial magistrates began proceedings to bring existing settlements under their authority in southern New Hampshire and Maine.[103] This extension of the colonial claim conflicted with several proprietary grants owned by the heirs of John Mason and Sir Ferdinando Gorges.[104] The Mason heirs pursued their claims in England, and the result was the formation of the Province of New Hampshire in 1679.[105] The current boundary between Massachusetts and New Hampshire was not fixed until 1741. In 1678, the colony purchased the claims of the Gorges heirs, gaining control over the territory between the Piscataqua and Kennebec Rivers.[106] The colony and later the province and state retained control of Maine until it was granted statehood in 1820.[107]
The colony performed a survey in 1642 to determine its southern boundary west to the Connecticut River.[108] This line, south of the present boundary, was protested by Connecticut, but stood until the 1690s, when Connecticut performed its own survey.[109] Most of today's Massachusetts boundaries with its neighbors were fixed in the 18th century.[110] The most significant exception was the eastern boundary with Rhode Island, which required extensive litigation, including Supreme Court rulings, before it was finally resolved in 1862.[111]
Lands which had previously belonged to the Pequots to the southwest were divided after the Pequot War in present-day Rhode Island and eastern Connecticut. Claims were disputed in this area for many years, particularly between Connecticut and Rhode Island.[112][113] Massachusetts administered Block Island and the area around present-day Stonington, Connecticut as part of these spoils of war,[114][115] and was one of several claimants to land in what was known as Narragansett Country (roughly Washington County, Rhode Island). Massachusetts lost all of these territories in the 1660s, when Connecticut and Rhode Island received their royal charters.[116][117]
Timeline of settlement[edit]
See also: List of municipalities in Massachusetts
This list is incomplete; you can help by expanding it.
Weymouth (Wessagusset) – 1622 as part of Plymouth Colony; part of Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1630
Gloucester – 1623 (Dorchester Company)
Chelsea – 1624
Quincy – 1625
Naumkeag (later Salem) – 1626 (Dorchester Company)
Beverly – 1626 (originally a part of Salem, incorporated separately in 1668)
Charlestown – 1628 (first capital, now part of Boston)
Lynn – 1629
Saugus – 1629
Manchester-by-the-Sea (Jeffery's Creek) – 1629
Marblehead – 1629 (Settled as a plantation of Salem, incorporated separately in 1639)
Boston – 1630 (from Shawmut and Trimountaine)
Medford – 1630
Mystic (now part of Malden)[118] – 1630
Everett – 1630 (settlement)
Watertown – 1630 (on land now part of Cambridge)
Newtowne (now Cambridge) – 1630 (near Harvard Square)
Roxbury – 1630 (now part of Boston)
Dorchester – 1630 (now part of Boston)
Newton – 1630
Chelmsford – 1633[citation needed]
Ipswich – 1633
Milton – 1634
Attleboro – 1634
Braintree – 1634
Agawam – 1635 (Settled as Agawam Plantation and originally administered by the Connecticut Colony; defected to Massachusetts with Springfield in 1640)
Concord – 1635
Hingham – 1635
Newbury – 1635
Dedham – 1635 (Settled as Contentment, renamed Dedham and incorporated in 1636)
Winthrop – 1635
Menotomy (now Arlington, then part of Newtowne) – 1635
Scituate – 1636 (Founded by the Men of Kent)
Andover – 1636 (Split into Andover and North Andover in 1856)
Springfield – 1636 (Settled as Agawam Plantation and originally administered by the Connecticut Colony; defected to Massachusetts and renamed Springfield in 1640)
Brookline – 1638 (Settled as Muddy River, considered part of Boston until it was renamed Brookline and incorporated in 1705)
Rowley – 1638
Salisbury – 1638
Reading – 1639 (Lynn Village, renamed and incorporated as Reading in 1644)
Sandwich – 1639 (First settled in 1637)
Sudbury – 1639
Winchester – 1640 (Founded as part of Charlestown, incorporated as Waterfield in 1640, incorporated 1850)
Chicopee – 1640 (Settled as Nayasett)
Haverhill – 1640
Braintree – 1640
Malden – 1640 (Founded as part of Charlestown, incorporated separately in 1649)
Woburn – 1640
Methuen – 1642 (founded as part of Haverhill, incorporated separately in 1725)
Longmeadow – 1644
Andover – 1646 (original settlement is now in North Andover)
Framingham – 1647
Natick – 1651
Eastham – 1651
Medfield – 1651
Billerica – 1653 (Founded as Shawshin)
Lancaster – 1653
Lowell – 1653 (Founded as East Chelmsford, was formally incorporated in 1826)
Northampton - 1654 (Incorporated in 1653)
Groton – 1655
Dunstable – 1656
Hadley – 1659
Middleton – 1659
Holliston – 1659
Marlborough – 1660
Westfield – 1660
West Springfield – 1660
Milford – 1662
Mendon – 1667
Middleborough – 1669
Worcester – 1673
See also[edit]
History of Massachusetts
List of colonial governors of Massachusetts
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Google phrase: distance Salem,MA to Boston,MA
Results: 38 min (22.2 mi) via US-1 S / 37 min (15.2 mi) via MA-107 and MA-1A S / 38 min (26.2 mi) via I-95 S and I-93 S
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:129–131
^ Jump up to: a b Hart, p. 1:129
Jump up ^ Vaughan, p. 28
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:127–128
Jump up ^ The 1606 charter did not assign names to the regional companies or councils, but the April 4, 1629 charter granted by King Charles I erroneously asserted that the 1606 charter had given the name "Council established at Plymouth in the county of Devon" to the council governing the "second Colony."
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:5
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:16–17
Jump up ^ Thayer, pp. 13–216
Jump up ^ Vaughan, p. 14
Jump up ^ Vaughan, p. 15
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:67–70
Jump up ^ Stratton, p. 27
Jump up ^ Heath, pp. xiii–xv
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 26
Jump up ^ Adams and Nash, pp. 29–34
Jump up ^ Young, Alexander (1846). Chronicles of the First Planters of the Colony of Massachusetts Bay, 1623–1636. Boston: C. C. Little and J. Brown. p. 26. Archived from the original on 2011-12-28. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
Jump up ^ Moore, p. 238
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 17–19
Jump up ^ Dates in this article are in the Julian calendar, which was then in use in England. The new year in that calendar fell on March 25, so dates between January 1 and March 25 are written with both years to avoid confusion.
^ Jump up to: a b Morison (1981), p. 32
Jump up ^ Morison (1981), p. 31
Jump up ^ Moore, pp. 347–348
Jump up ^ Hubbard (1848), p. 112
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 39
Jump up ^ Winthrop et al, p. 35
Jump up ^ MacDonald, p. 22
Jump up ^ Francis, Richard. Judge Sewall's Apology. p. 41
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 30
Jump up ^ Bremer (2003), p. 175
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 85
Jump up ^ Adams, pp. 181–182
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:564
Jump up ^ Adams, p. 212
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:565
Jump up ^ Starkey, pp. 129–131
Jump up ^ Starkey, p. 131
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 56
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 56–58
^ Jump up to: a b Labaree, p. 59
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 48–49
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 84–90
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 51
Jump up ^ Main, p. 29
Jump up ^ Hawke, David (2003). Everyday Life in Early America. New York: Harper. p. 66. ISBN 0060912510.
Jump up ^ Foster, Thomas (October 1999). "Deficient Husbands: Manhood, Sexual Incapacity, and Male Marital Sexuality in Seventeenth-Century New England". The William and Mary Quarterly. 56: 723–744. doi:10.2307/2674233.
Jump up ^ Main, pp. 64–65
^ Jump up to: a b Hart, p. 1:103
^ Jump up to: a b Hart, p. 1:105
^ Jump up to: a b Hart, p. 1:106
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:104–105
Jump up ^ Main, p. 47
^ Jump up to: a b Hart, p. 1:107
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:108
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:113
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:112
Jump up ^ Clifton E. Olmstead (1960), History of Religion in the United States, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., p. 71
Jump up ^ Bremer (2003), p. 305
^ Jump up to: a b "Massachusetts Body of Liberties". Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Archived from the original on 2012-05-21. Retrieved 2012-05-22.
^ Jump up to: a b Dow, p. 200
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Nielsen, K.E. (2012). A Disability History of the United States. Beacon Press. ISBN 9780807022047.
Jump up ^ Wickham, Parnel (2001). "Images of Idiocy in Puritan New England". Mental Retardation. 39 (2): 147. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
Jump up ^ Wickham, Parnel (April 2001). "Idiocy and the Law in Colonial New England". Mental Retardation. 39 (2): 104. |access-date= requires |url= (help)
Jump up ^ All of these crimes were drawn from the records of Essex County during the colonial period. Dow, pp. 224–225
Jump up ^ Dow, p. 201
Jump up ^ Dow, pp. 200–204
Jump up ^ Dow, p. 202
Jump up ^ Dow, p. 224
Jump up ^ Addison, p. 131
Jump up ^ Guiley, p. 186
Jump up ^ Rogers, pp. 1–2
Jump up ^ Bremer (2006), p. 1:xli
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 87–88
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 100–105
Jump up ^ West, p. 104
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:448
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 90
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 93
Jump up ^ Labaree, pp. 94–95
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 92
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:424
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:425
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:431
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:432
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:426–427
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:427
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:429
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:56–57
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:55
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:52
^ Jump up to: a b Hart, p. 1:54
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:53
Jump up ^ Hart, pp. 1:61–62
Jump up ^ Hart, p. 1:63
Jump up ^ Bremer (2003), p. 273
Jump up ^ Bremer (2003), p. 314
Jump up ^ Anderson, p. 1:211
Jump up ^ Thomas, p. 453
Jump up ^ Thomas, p. 207
Jump up ^ Hubbard (2009), pp. 14–17
Jump up ^ Winthrop et al, p. 339
Jump up ^ Morison (1956), p. 156
Jump up ^ Mayo, pp. 221–226
Jump up ^ Hubbard (2009), pp. 13–14
Jump up ^ Fry, pp. 54–65
Jump up ^ Fry, pp. 19–22, 65
Jump up ^ Labaree, p. 87
Jump up ^ Bowen, p. 15
Jump up ^ Bowen, p. 54
Jump up ^ Field, p. 171
Jump up ^ Field, p. 374
Jump up ^ Wheeler, pp. 1–2
Jump up ^ Field, pp. 98–101
Jump up ^ Wheeler, p. 11
Jump up ^ Field, p. 107
Jump up ^ Wheeler, p. 15
Jump up ^ Field, pp. 100,107
Jump up ^ 1630: Information and Much More from Answers.com Archived 2007-03-26 at the Wayback Machine.
Bibliography[edit]
Adams, Charles Francis; Nash, Gilbert (1905). Wessagusset and Weymouth. Weymouth, MA: Weymouth Historical Society. OCLC 1066255.
Adams, Brooks. The Emancipation of Massachusetts.
Adams, Charles; Nash, Gilbert (1905). Wessagusset and Weymouth. Weymouth, MA: Weymouth Historical Society. OCLC 1066255.
Addison, Albert Christopher (1912). The Romantic Story of the Puritan Fathers: And Their Founding of New Boston. L.C. Page & Co.
Anderson, Robert Charles (1995). The Great Migration Begins: Immigrants to New England, 1620–1633. Boston, MA: New England Historic Genealogical Society. ISBN 978-0-88082-120-9. OCLC 42469253.
Bowen, Clarence Winthrop (1882). The Boundary Disputes of Connecticut. Boston: James R. Osgood. OCLC 1994357.
Bremer, Francis (2003). John Winthrop: America's Forgotten Founder. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-514913-5. OCLC 237802295.
Bremer, Francis; Webster, Tom (2006). Puritans and Puritanism in Europe and America: a Comprehensive Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-57607-678-1.
Dow, George Francis (1967) [1935]. Everyday Life in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. New York: Benjamin Blom.
Field, Edward (ed) (1902). State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations at the End of the Century: a History. Boston, MA: Mason Publishing. OCLC 14245880. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Fry, William Henry (1908). New Hampshire as a Royal Province. New York: Columbia University. OCLC 1981065.
Guiley, Rosemary (2008) [1999]. The Encyclopedia of Witches, Witchcraft, and Wicca. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 9781438126845. OCLC 435912011.
Hart, Albert Bushnell (ed) (1927). Commonwealth History of Massachusetts. New York: The States History Company. OCLC 1543273. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link) (five volume history of Massachusetts until the early 20th century)
Hayes, Kevin (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Early American Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195187274. OCLC 132584511.
Heath, Dwight (ed) (1986) [1963]. Mourt's Relation: A Journal of the Pilgrims at Plymouth. Cambridge, MA: Applewood Books. ISBN 9780918222848. OCLC 20838253. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Hubbard, Bill (2009). American Boundaries: the Nation, the States, the Rectangular Survey. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-35591-7. OCLC 163625212.
Hubbard, William (1848). A General History of New England. Boston: C.C. Little and J. Brown.
Labaree, Benjamin (1979). Colonial Massachusetts: a History. Millwood, NY: KTO Press. ISBN 978-0-527-18714-9. OCLC 248194957.
MacDonald, William (1908). Documentary Source Book of American History: 1606–1898. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Main, Gloria (2001). Peoples of a Spacious Land. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 0674006283.
Mayo, Lawrence Shaw (1936). John Endecott. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. OCLC 1601746.
Moore, Jacob Bailey (1851). Lives of the Governors of New Plymouth and Massachusetts Bay. Boston: C. D. Strong. OCLC 11362972.
Morison, Samuel Eliot (1956). The story of the "Old Colony" of New Plymouth, 1620–1692. New York: Knopf. OCLC 174859473.
Morison, Samuel Eliot (1981) [1930]. Builders of the Bay Colony. Boston: Northeastern University Press. ISBN 0-930350-22-7.
Nagl, Dominik (2013). No Part of the Mother Country, but Distinct Dominions - Law, State Formation and Governance in England, Massachusetts and South Carolina, 1630-1769. Berlin: LIT. ISBN 978-3-643-11817-2.
Rogers, Horatio (2009). Mary Dyer of Rhode Island: The Quaker Martyr That Was Hanged on Boston. BiblioBazaar. ISBN 978-1-103-80124-4.
Starkey, Marion L. (1961) [1949]. The Devil in Massachusetts: A Modern Inquiry into the Salem Witch Trials. Garden City, NY: Dolphin.
Stratton, Eugene (1986). Plymouth Colony: Its History & People, 1620–1691. Salt Lake City, UT: Ancestry Publications. ISBN 9780916489137. OCLC 15349442.
Thayer, Henry Otis (1892). The Sagadahoc Colony. Portland: Printed for the Gorges Society. Retrieved 2008-12-23.
Thomas, Hugh (1997). The Slave Trade: the Story of the Atlantic Slave Trade, 1440–1870. New York: Simon and Schuster. ISBN 978-0-684-81063-8. OCLC 36884041.
Vaughan, Alden T (1995). New England Frontier: Puritans and Indians, 1620–1675. Norman, OK: Oklahoma University Press. ISBN 978-0-8061-2718-7. OCLC 299797876.
West, Willis (1922). The Story of American Democracy, Political and Industrial. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. OCLC 2564556.
Wheeler, Richard (2009) [1900]. History of the Town of Stonington, Connecticut. Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Company. OCLC 30055748.
Winthrop, John; Dunn, Richard; Savage, James; Yeandle, Laetitia (1996). The Journal of John Winthrop, 1630–1649. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-48425-2. OCLC 185405449.
Online primary sources[edit]
500+ volumes of colonial records
The Charters and General Laws of the Colony and Province of Massachusetts Bay. Boston: Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 1814. OCLC 19448862.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Massachusetts Bay Company.
Massachusetts Secretary of State: The History of the Arms and Great Seal of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Quaqua Society: Massachusetts Bay Colony
Buffalo, NY and the Massachusetts Bay colony
[show]
v
t
e
British Empire
Legend
Current territory
Former territory
* Now a Commonwealth realm
Now a member of the Commonwealth of Nations
Historical flags of the British Empire
[show]
Europe
1542–1800 Ireland (integrated into UK)
1708–1757, 1763–1782 and 1798–1802 Minorca
Since 1713 Gibraltar
1800–1813 Malta (Protectorate)
1813–1964 Malta (Colony)
1807–1890 Heligoland
1809–1864 Ionian Islands
1878–1960 Cyprus
1921–1937 Irish Free State
[show]
North America
17th century and before 18th century 19th and 20th century
1579 New Albion
1583–1907 Newfoundland
1605–1979 *Saint Lucia
1607–1776 Virginia
Since 1619 Bermuda
1620–1691 Plymouth
1623–1883 Saint Kitts
1624–1966 *Barbados
1625–1650 Saint Croix
1627–1979 *Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
1628–1883 Nevis
1629–1691 Massachusetts Bay
1632–1776 Maryland
since 1632 Montserrat
1632–1860 Antigua
1635–1644 Saybrook
1636–1776 Connecticut
1636–1776 Rhode Island
1637–1662 New Haven
1643–1860 Bay Islands
Since 1650 Anguilla
1655–1850 Mosquito Coast
1655–1962 *Jamaica
1663–1712 Carolina
1664–1776 New York
1665–1674 and 1702–1776 New Jersey
Since 1666 Virgin Islands
Since 1670 Cayman Islands
1670–1973 *Bahamas
1670–1870 Rupert's Land
1671–1816 Leeward Islands
1674–1702 East Jersey
1674–1702 West Jersey
1680–1776 New Hampshire
1681–1776 Pennsylvania
1686–1689 New England
1691–1776 Massachusetts Bay
1701–1776 Delaware
1712–1776 North Carolina
1712–1776 South Carolina
1713–1867 Nova Scotia
1733–1776 Georgia
1754–1820 Cape Breton Island
1762–1974 *Grenada
1763–1978 Dominica
1763–1873 Prince Edward Island
1763–1791 Quebec
1763–1783 East Florida
1763–1783 West Florida
1784–1867 New Brunswick
1791–1841 Lower Canada
1791–1841 Upper Canada
Since 1799 Turks and Caicos Islands
1818–1846 Columbia District/Oregon Country1
1833–1960 Windward Islands
1833–1960 Leeward Islands
1841–1867 Canada
1849–1866 Vancouver Island
1853–1863 Queen Charlotte Islands
1858–1866 British Columbia
1859–1870 North-Western Territory
1860–1981 *British Antigua and Barbuda
1862–1863 Stickeen
1866–1871 British Columbia
1867–1931 *Dominion of Canada2
1871–1964 Honduras
1882–1983 *Saint Kitts and Nevis
1889–1962 Trinidad and Tobago
1907–1949 Newfoundland3
1958–1962 West Indies Federation
1. Occupied jointly with the United States.
2. In 1931, Canada and other British dominions obtained self-government through the Statute of Westminster. See Name of Canada.
3. Gave up self-rule in 1934, but remained a de jure Dominion until it joined Canada in 1949.
[show]
South America
1631–1641 Providence Island
1651–1667 Willoughbyland
1670–1688 Saint Andrew and Providence Islands4
1831–1966 Guiana
Since 1833 Falkland Islands5
Since 1908 South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands5
4. Now a department of Colombia.
5. Occupied by Argentina during the Falklands War of April–June 1982.
[show]
Africa
17th and 18th centuries 19th century 20th century
Since 1658 Saint Helena14
1792–1961 Sierra Leone
1795–1803 Cape Colony
Since 1815 Ascension Island14
Since 1816 Tristan da Cunha14
1806–1910 Cape of Good Hope
1807–1808 Madeira
1810–1968 Mauritius
1816–1965 The Gambia
1856–1910 Natal
1862–1906 Lagos
1868–1966 Basutoland
1874–1957 Gold Coast
1882–1922 Egypt
1884–1900 Niger Coast
1884–1966 Bechuanaland
1884–1960 Somaliland
1887–1897 Zululand
1890–1962 Uganda
1890–1963 Zanzibar
1891–1964 Nyasaland
1891–1907 Central Africa
1893–1968 Swaziland
1895–1920 East Africa
1899–1956 Sudan
1900–1914 Northern Nigeria
1900–1914 Southern Nigeria
1900–1910 Orange River
1900–1910 Transvaal
1903–1976 Seychelles
1910–1931 South Africa
1914–1960 Nigeria
1915–1931 South-West Africa
1919–1961 Cameroons6
1920–1963 Kenya
1922–1961 Tanganyika6
1923–1965 and 1979–1980 Southern Rhodesia7
1924–1964 Northern Rhodesia
6. League of Nations mandate.
7. Self-governing Southern Rhodesia unilaterally declared independence in 1965 (as Rhodesia) and continued as an unrecognised state until the 1979 Lancaster House Agreement. After recognised independence in 1980, Zimbabwe was a member of the Commonwealth until it withdrew in 2003.
[show]
Asia
17th and 18th century 19th century 20th century
1685–1824 Bencoolen
1702–1705 Pulo Condore
1757–1947 Bengal
1762–1764 Manila and Cavite
1781–1784 and 1795–1819 Padang
1786–1946 Penang
1795–1948 Ceylon
1796–1965 Maldives
1811–1816 Java
1812–1824 Banka and Billiton
1819–1826 Malaya
1824–1948 Burma
1826–1946 Straits Settlements
1839–1967 Aden
1839–1842 Afghanistan
1841–1997 Hong Kong
1841–1946 Sarawak
1848–1946 Labuan
1858–1947 India
1874–1963 Borneo
1879–1919 Afghanistan (protectorate)
1882–1963 North Borneo
1885–1946 Unfederated Malay States
1888–1984 Brunei
1891–1971 Muscat and Oman
1892–1971 Trucial States
1895–1946 Federated Malay States
1898–1930 Weihai
1878–1960 Cyprus
1907–1949 Bhutan (protectorate)
1918–1961 Kuwait
1920–1932 Mesopotamia8
1921–1946 Transjordan8
1923–1948 Palestine8
1945–1946 South Vietnam
1946–1963 North Borneo
1946–1963 Sarawak
1946–1963 Singapore
1946–1948 Malayan Union
1948–1957 Federation of Malaya
Since 1960 Akrotiri and Dhekelia (before as part of Cyprus)
Since 1965 British Indian Ocean Territory (before as part of Mauritius and the Seychelles)
8 League of Nations mandate. Iraq's mandate was not enacted and replaced by the Anglo-Iraqi Treaty
[show]
Oceania
18th and 19th centuries 20th century
1788–1901 New South Wales
1803–1901 Van Diemen's Land/Tasmania
1807–1863 Auckland Islands9
1824–1980 New Hebrides
1824–1901 Queensland
1829–1901 Swan River/Western Australia
1836–1901 South Australia
since 1838 Pitcairn Islands
1841–1907 New Zealand
1851–1901 Victoria
1874–1970 Fiji10
1877–1976 Western Pacific Territories
1884–1949 Papua
1888–1901 Rarotonga/Cook Islands9
1889–1948 Union Islands9
1892–1979 Gilbert and Ellice Islands11
1893–1978 Solomon Islands12
1900–1970 Tonga
1900–1974 Niue9
1901–1942 *Australia
1907–1947 *New Zealand
1919–1942 and 1945–1968 Nauru
1919–1949 New Guinea
1949–1975 Papua and New Guinea13
9. Now part of the *Realm of New Zealand.
10. Suspended member.
11. Now Kiribati and *Tuvalu.
12. Now the *Solomon Islands.
13. Now *Papua New Guinea.
[show]
Antarctica and South Atlantic
Since 1658 Saint Helena14
Since 1815 Ascension Island14
Since 1816 Tristan da Cunha14
Since 1908 British Antarctic Territory15
1841–1933 Australian Antarctic Territory (transferred to the Commonwealth of Australia)
1841–1947 Ross Dependency (transferred to the Realm of New Zealand)
14. Since 2009 part of Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha; Ascension Island (1922–) and Tristan da Cunha (1938–) were previously dependencies of Saint Helena.
15. Both claimed in 1908; territories formed in 1962 (British Antarctic Territory) and 1985 (South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Massachusetts_Bay_Colony&oldid=825879172"
Categories:
Colonial Massachusetts
Colonial United States (British)
Dominion of New England
English colonization of the Americas
Former English colonies
History of the Thirteen Colonies
Colonial settlements in North America
Pre-statehood history of Massachusetts
States and territories established in 1628
1628 establishments in the Thirteen Colonies
1691 disestablishments in the Thirteen Colonies
States and territories disestablished in 1691
1628 establishments in Massachusetts
Politically motivated migrations
Hidden categories:
Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL
Webarchive template wayback links
Former country articles requiring maintenance
Pages using infobox former subdivision with unknown parameters
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2015
Incomplete lists from August 2008
Articles with unsourced statements from May 2017
CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list
Massachusetts articles missing geocoordinate data
All articles needing coordinates
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Беларуская
Català
Deutsch
Français
한국어
Íslenska
Italiano
Latina
Lietuvių
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Русский
Simple English
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Svenska
தமிழ்
Українська
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 15 February 2018, at 23:31.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: colspan class style

attrs: colspan style

attrs: width style

values: border:0; vertical-align:middle; font-size:30%; line-height: 105%;

values: vertical-align:middle; text-align:center; font-size:115%; border:0

attrs: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: border:0; vertical-align: middle; text-align:right; line-height: 105%; font-size:30%;

value: tbody

value: table

values: text-align:center; margin:0 auto; background:none;

values: vertical-align:middle; text-align:center; border-top: solid 1px #aaa; padding: 0.2em 0em 0.2em 0em;

values: border:1px solid #bbbbbb; display:table-cell;

values:
/wiki/File:MassBaySeal.jpg
image
Coat of arms

values:
/wiki/Coat_of_arms_of_Massachusetts
mw-redirect
Coat of arms of Massachusetts

values:
/wiki/File:Masscolony.png
image
Location of Massachusetts

values: text-align:center; font-size:95%; padding:0.6em 0em 0.6em 0em;

values:
/wiki/Charlestown,_Massachusetts
mw-redirect
Charlestown, Massachusetts

values:
/wiki/Boston,_Massachusetts
mw-redirect
Boston, Massachusetts

values:
/wiki/New_Netherlands
mw-redirect
New Netherlands

values:
/wiki/Plymouth_Bay_Colony
mw-redirect
Plymouth Bay Colony

values: Puritan migration to New England (1620–1640)

values: List of colonial governors of Massachusetts

values:
/wiki/Mohawk_nation
mw-redirect
Mohawk nation

values:
/wiki/James_I_of_England
mw-redirect
James I of England

values:
/wiki/James_VI_of_Scotland
mw-redirect
James VI of Scotland

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2015)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Sagadahoc_Colony
mw-redirect
Sagadahoc Colony

values:
/wiki/Pilgrim_(Plymouth_Colony)
mw-redirect
Pilgrim (Plymouth Colony)

values:
/wiki/Thomas_Gardner_(Planter)
mw-redirect
Thomas Gardner (Planter)

values:
/wiki/Roger_Conant_(Salem)
mw-redirect
Roger Conant (Salem)

values:
/wiki/Naumkeag_tribe
mw-redirect
Naumkeag tribe

values: Edit section: Legal formation of the colony

values:
/wiki/Royal_Charter
mw-redirect
Royal Charter

values:
/wiki/Great_Migration_(Puritan)
mw-redirect
Great Migration (Puritan)

values:
/wiki/John_Cotton_(puritan)
mw-redirect
John Cotton (puritan)

values: Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

values:
/wiki/English_Commonwealth
mw-redirect
English Commonwealth

values:
/wiki/English_Restoration
mw-redirect
English Restoration

values:
/wiki/Swift_River_(Ware_River)
mw-redirect
Swift River (Ware River)

values: Edit section: Unifications and restoration

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values:
/wiki/Puritan_work_ethic
mw-redirect
Puritan work ethic

values: History of the Puritans under Queen Elizabeth I

values: History of the Puritans under King James I

values: History of the Puritans under King Charles I

values: History of the Puritans in North America

values: Puritan migration to New England (1620–40)

values: New England Puritan culture and recreation

values: William Bradford (Plymouth Colony governor)

values:
/wiki/Congregational_churches
mw-redirect
Congregational churches

values:
/wiki/Reformed_churches
mw-redirect
Reformed churches

values:
/wiki/Nondenominational_Protestants
mw-redirect
Nondenominational Protestants

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;border-collapse:collapse;

values:
/wiki/Great_and_General_Court
mw-redirect
Great and General Court

values:
/wiki/Bicameral_legislature
mw-redirect
Bicameral legislature

values: Edit section: Notable criminal prosecutions

values:
/wiki/Dorothy_Talbye_Trial
mw-redirect
Dorothy Talbye Trial

values:
/wiki/Mental_illness
mw-redirect
Mental illness

values:
/wiki/Indentured_servant
mw-redirect
Indentured servant

values:
/wiki/United_States_Supreme_Court
mw-redirect
United States Supreme Court

values:
/wiki/Roxbury,_Massachusetts
mw-redirect
Roxbury, Massachusetts

values:
/wiki/Dorchester,_Massachusetts
mw-redirect
Dorchester, Massachusetts

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (May 2017)

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F2674233

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.answers.com/topic/1630

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/1066255

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/42469253

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/1994357

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/237802295

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/14245880

values: Category:CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/1981065

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/435912011

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/1543273

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/132584511

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/20838253

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/163625212

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/248194957

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/1601746

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/11362972

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/174859473

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/15349442

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/36884041

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/299797876

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/2564556

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/30055748

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/185405449

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/19448862

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.quaqua.org/pilgrim.htm

values: Template talk:British overseas territories

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-subgroup

values:
/wiki/British_Saint_Lucia
mw-redirect
British Saint Lucia

values: History of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

values: Archipelago of San Andrés, Providencia and Santa Catalina

values: South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

values:
/wiki/South-West_Africa
mw-redirect
South-West Africa

values: Rhodesia's Unilateral Declaration of Independence

values:
/wiki/British_invasion_of_Manila
mw-redirect
British invasion of Manila

values:
/wiki/Java_Island
mw-redirect
Java Island

values: British Mandate for Mesopotamia (legal instrument)

values:
/wiki/Colony_of_Western_Australia
mw-redirect
Colony of Western Australia

values:
/wiki/Colony_of_South_Australia
mw-redirect
Colony of South Australia

values:
/wiki/Colony_of_Victoria
mw-redirect
Colony of Victoria

values:
/wiki/Union_Islands
mw-redirect
Union Islands

values:
/wiki/Commonwealth_of_Australia
mw-redirect
Commonwealth of Australia

values: Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

values: nowraplinks plainlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Colonial United States (British)

values: Category:English colonization of the Americas

values: Category:History of the Thirteen Colonies

values: Category:Colonial settlements in North America

values: Category:Pre-statehood history of Massachusetts

values: Category:States and territories established in 1628

values: Category:1628 establishments in the Thirteen Colonies

values: Category:1691 disestablishments in the Thirteen Colonies

values: Category:States and territories disestablished in 1691

values: Category:1628 establishments in Massachusetts

values: Category:Pages using citations with accessdate and no URL

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Former country articles requiring maintenance

values: Category:Pages using infobox former subdivision with unknown parameters

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2015

values: Category:Incomplete lists from August 2008

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from May 2017

values: Category:Massachusetts articles missing geocoordinate data

values: Category:All articles needing coordinates

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Massachusetts_Bay_Colony
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values: مستعمرة خليج ماساتشوستس – Arabic

values: Калонія Масачусецкага заліва – Belarusian

values: Colònia de la Badia de Massachusetts – Catalan

values: Colonie de la baie du Massachusetts – French

values: 매사추세츠 만 식민지 – Korean

values: Colonia della Massachusetts Bay – Italian

values: Colonia Sinus Massachusettensium – Latin

values: Masačiusetso įlankos kolonija – Lithuanian

values: マサチューセッツ湾植民地 – Japanese

values: Колония Массачусетского залива – Russian

values: Massachusetts Bay Colony – Simple English

values: Kolonija Zaljeva Massachusetts – Serbo-Croatian

values: மாசச்சூசெட்சு விரிகுடாக் குடியேற்றம் – Tamil

values: Колонія Массачусетської затоки – Ukrainian

values: 馬薩諸塞灣殖民地 – Chinese

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Massachusetts_Bay_Colony rootpage-Massachusetts_Bay_Colony skin-vector action-view


text:
Robber baron (industrialist)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Robber baron (disambiguation).
"The protectors of our industries". Cartoon showing Cyrus Field, Jay Gould, Cornelius Vanderbilt, and Russell Sage, seated on bags of "millions", on large heavy raft being carried by workers.
Let Them Have It All, And Be Done With It! (1882): A satirical cartoon from the German language edition of Puck Magazine, critical of those who are carving up the country for their own benefit.
"Robber baron" is a derogatory metaphor of social criticism originally applied to certain late 19th-century American businessmen who used unscrupulous methods to get rich.
Contents
[hide]
1 Usage
2 Criticism
2.1 1860s–1920s
2.2 1930s–1970s
3 Recent approaches
4 List of businessmen labelled as robber barons
5 See also
6 References
7 Further reading
8 External links
Usage[edit]
The term robber baron derives from the Raubritter (robber knights), the medieval German lords who charged nominally illegal tolls (unauthorized by the Holy Roman Emperor) on the primitive roads crossing their lands[1] or larger tolls along the Rhine river — all without adding anything of value, but instead lining their pockets at the cost of the common good (rent seeking).
The metaphor appeared as early as February 9, 1859, when The New York Times used it to characterize the unethical business practices by Cornelius Vanderbilt. Historian T.J. Stiles says the metaphor, "conjures up visions of titanic monopolists who crushed competitors, rigged markets, and corrupted government. In their greed and power, legend has it, they held sway over a helpless democracy."[2] Charles R. Geisst says, "in a Darwinist age, Vanderbilt developed a reputation as a plunderer who took no prisoners."[3] Hal Bridges said that the term represented the idea that "business leaders in the United States from about 1865 to 1900 were, on the whole, a set of avaricious rascals who habitually cheated and robbed investors and consumers, corrupted government, fought ruthlessly among themselves, and in general carried on predatory activities comparable to those of the robber barons of medieval Europe."[4]
The term combines the pejorative senses of criminal ("robber") and aristocrat ("barons" having no legitimate role in a republic). Hostile cartoonists might dress the offenders in royal garb to underscore the offense against democracy.[5]
Criticism[edit]
1860s–1920s[edit]
Historian John Tipple has examined the writings of the 50 most influential analysts who used the robber baron model in the 1865-1914 period. He argues:
The originators of the Robber Baron concept were not the injured, the poor, the faddists, the jealous, or a dispossessed elite, but rather a frustrated group of observers led at last by protracted years of harsh depression to believe that the American dream of abundant prosperity for all was a hopeless myth....Thus the creation of the Robber Baron stereotype seems to have been the product of an impulsive popular attempt to explain the shift in the structure of American society in terms of the obvious. Rather than make the effort to understand the intricate processes of change, most critics appeared to slip into the easy vulgarizations of the "devil-view" of history which ingenuously assumes that all human misfortunes can be traced to the machinations of an easily located set of villains - in this case, the big businessmen of America. This assumption was clearly implicit in almost all of the criticism of the period.[6]
1930s–1970s[edit]
American historian Matthew Josephson further popularized the term during the Great Depression in a 1934 book.[7] Josephson alleged that, like the German princes, American big businessmen amassed huge fortunes immorally, unethically, and unjustly. The theme was popular during the 1930s amid public scorn for big business. Historian Steve Fraser says the mood was sharply hostile toward big business:
Biographies of Mellon, Carnegie and Rockefeller were often laced with moral censure, warning that “tories of industry” were a threat to democracy and that parasitism, aristocratic pretension and tyranny have always trailed in the wake of concentrated wealth, whether accumulated dynastically or more impersonally by the faceless corporation. This scholarship, and the cultural persuasion of which it was an expression, drew on a deeply rooted sensibility–partly religious, partly egalitarian and democratic–that stretched back to William Jennings Bryan, Andrew Jackson and Tom Paine.[8]

However a counterattack by academic historians began as the Depression ended. Business historian Allan Nevins challenged this view of American big businessmen by advocating the "Industrial Statesman" thesis. Nevins, in his John D. Rockefeller: The Heroic Age of American Enterprise (2 vols., 1940), took on Josephson. He argued that while Rockefeller may have engaged in some unethical and illegal business practices, this should not overshadow his bringing order to the industrial chaos of the day. Gilded Age capitalists, according to Nevins, sought to impose order and stability on competitive business, and that their work made the United States the foremost economy by the 20th century.[9]
In 1958 Bridges reported that, "The most vehement and persistent controversy in business history has been that waged by the critics and defenders of the “robber baron” concept of the American businessman."[10] Richard White, historian of the transcontinental railroads, stated in 2011 he has no use for the concept, which has been killed off by historians Robert Wiebe and Alfred Chandler. He notes that, "Much of the modern history of corporations is a reaction against the Robber Barons and fictions."[11]
Recent approaches[edit]
In the popular culture the metaphor continues. In 1975 the student body of Stanford University voted to use "Robber Barons" as the nickname for their sports teams. However, school administrators disallowed it, saying it was disrespectful to the school's founder, Leland Stanford.[12]
In academe, the education division of the National Endowment for the Humanities has prepared a lesson plan for schools asking whether "robber baron" or "captain of industry" is the better terminology. They state:
In this lesson, you and your students will attempt to establish a distinction between robber barons and captains of industry. Students will uncover some of the less honorable deeds as well as the shrewd business moves and highly charitable acts of the great industrialists and financiers. It has been argued that only because such people were able to amass great amounts of capital could our country become the world's greatest industrial power. Some of the actions of these men, which could only happen in a period of economic laissez faire, resulted in poor conditions for workers, but in the end, may also have enabled our present day standard of living.[13]
This debate about the morality of certain business practices has continued in the popular culture, as in the performances in Europe in 2012 by Bruce Springsteen, who sang about bankers as "greedy thieves" and "robber barons."[14] During the Occupy Wall Street protests of 2011, the term was used by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders in his attacks on Wall Street. He said "We believe in this country; we love this country; and we will be damned if we’re going to see a handful of robber barons control the future of this country."[15] The business practices and political power of the billionaires of Silicon Valley has also led to their identification as robber barons.[16][17]
The metaphor has also been used to characterize Russian businessmen allied to Vladimir Putin.[18]
List of businessmen labelled as robber barons[edit]
1901 US cartoon from Puck depicting John D. Rockefeller as a powerful monarch.
The people here are listed in Josephson, Robber Barons or in the cited source,
John Jacob Astor (real estate, fur) – New York
Andrew Carnegie (steel) – Pittsburgh and New York
William A. Clark (copper) – Butte, Montana[19]
Jay Cooke (finance) – Philadelphia
Charles Crocker (railroads) – California
Daniel Drew (finance) – New York
James Buchanan Duke (tobacco) – Durham, North Carolina
James Dunsmuir (coal, lumber) - Victoria, BC Canada[20]
Marshall Field (retail) – Chicago[21]
James Fisk (finance) – New York
Henry Morrison Flagler (Standard Oil, railroads) – New York and Florida[22]
Henry Clay Frick (steel) – Pittsburgh and New York
John Warne Gates (barbed wire, oil) – Texas[23]
Jay Gould (railroads) – New York[24]
Edward Henry Harriman (railroads) – New York[25]
James J. Hill (fuel, coal, steamboats, railroads) - St Paul, Minnesota
Charles T. Hinde (railroads, water transport, shipping, hotels) – Illinois, Missouri, Kentucky, California
Mark Hopkins (railroads) – California
Collis Potter Huntington (railroads) – California
Lars Kovala (land speculator, railroads) – California, Wisconsin, Michigan
Andrew W. Mellon (finance, oil) – Pittsburgh
J. P. Morgan (finance, industrial consolidation) – New York
John Cleveland Osgood (coal mining, iron) – Colorado[26]
Henry B. Plant (railroads) – Florida[27]
John D. Rockefeller (Standard Oil) – Cleveland, New York
Henry Huttleston Rogers (Standard Oil; copper), New York.[28]
Charles M. Schwab (steel) – Pittsburgh and New York
Joseph Seligman (banking) – New York
John D. Spreckels (water transport, railroads, sugar) – California
Leland Stanford (railroads) – California
Cornelius Vanderbilt (water transport, railroads) – New York[29]
Charles Tyson Yerkes (street railroads) – Chicago[30]
See also[edit]
Business magnate
Captain of industry
Raubritter
Burton W. Folsom Jr.
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "A Romance of the New Era". Harper's New Monthly Magazine. LXXXIX (DXXXIV). November 1894. Retrieved 2009-07-10.
Jump up ^ T. J. Stiles, "Robber Barons or Captains of Industry?" History Now
Jump up ^ Charles R. Geisst (1997). Wall Street : A History. Oxford UP. p. 77.
Jump up ^ Hal Bridges, "The robber baron concept in American history." Business History Review 32#1 (1958): 1-13, page 1.
Jump up ^ Worth Robert Miller, Populist cartoons: an illustrated history of the third-party movement in the 1890s (2011) p. 13
Jump up ^ John Tipple, "The anatomy of prejudice: Origins of the robber baron legend." Business History Review 33#4 (1959): 510-523, quoting pp 510, 521.
Jump up ^ Matthew Josephson, The Robber Barons: The Great American Capitalists, 1861–1901, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1934.
Jump up ^ Steve Fraser, "The Misunderstood Robber Baron: On Cornelius Vanderbilt: T.J. Stiles's The First Tycoon is a gilded portrait of the robber baron Cornelius Vanderbilt," The Nation Nov. 11, 2009
Jump up ^ Allan Nevins, John D. Rockefeller: The Heroic Age of American Enterprise, 2 vols., New York, C. Scribner’s sons, 1940.
Jump up ^ Bridges, "The robber baron concept in American history." p 1
Jump up ^ Richard White, Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America (2011) pp xxxi, 234, 508
Jump up ^ John R. Thelin, "California and the Colleges," California Historical Quarterly (1977) 56#2 pp 140–63 at p 149.
Jump up ^ "The Industrial Age in America: Robber Barons and Captains of Industry" EDSITEment! The Best of the humanities on the web."
Jump up ^ Erik Kirschbaum, "Bruce Springsteen: Bankers Are 'Greedy Thieves'" Reuters May 31, 2012
Jump up ^ Bernie Sanders (2015). Outsider in the White House. Verso Books. p. 278.
Jump up ^ Hanson, Victor Davis (17 August 2017). "Silicon Valley Billionaires Are the New Robber Barons". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
Jump up ^ Motley, Seton (31 July 2017). "Silicon Valley Robber Barons Are Using Government As A Weapon Against Us". Retrieved 30 August 2017.
Jump up ^ David O. Whitten, "Russian robber barons: Moscow business, American style." European Journal of Law and Economics 13#3 (2002): 193-201.
Jump up ^ Charles O'Brien (2013). Death of a Robber Baron. Kensington. p. 289.
Jump up ^ Jepson, Tim (2004-01-01). The Rough Guide to Vancouver. Rough Guides. ISBN 9781843532453.
Jump up ^ Theodore Dreiser; Roark Mulligan, editor. (2010). The Financier: The Critical Edition. U. of Illinois Press. p. 559. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ David Leon Chandler, Henry Flagler: The Astonishing Life and Times of the Visionary Robber Baron Who Founded Florida (1986)
Jump up ^ George C. Kohn (2001). The New Encyclopedia of American Scandal. Infobase Publishing. p. 152.
Jump up ^ Edward Renehan, Dark Genius of Wall Street: The Misunderstood Life of Jay Gould, King of the Robber Barons (2005)
Jump up ^ Keys, C. M. (January 1906). "The Overlords of Railroad Traffic: The Seven Men Who Reign Supreme". The World's Work: A History of Our Time. XIII: 8437–8445. Retrieved 2009-07-10.
Jump up ^ "The Redstone Story re-lives the industrialization of the West" Redstone, Colorado website, history
Jump up ^ Mary Kupiec Cayton et al. eds. (1993). Encyclopedia of American social history. Scribner. pp. 1064 vol 2. CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Martin Naparsteck; Michele Cardulla (2013). Mrs. Mark Twain: The Life of Olivia Langdon Clemens, 1845-1904. McFarland. p. 109.
Jump up ^ T. J. Stiles, The First Tycoon: The Epic Life of Cornelius Vanderbilt (2010) p 328
Jump up ^ John Franch, Robber Baron: The Life of Charles Tyson Yerkes (2008)
Further reading[edit]
Beatty, Jack. (2008). Age of Betrayal: The Triumph of Money in America, 1865-1900 Vintage Books. ISBN 1400032423
Bridges, Hal. (1958) "The Robber Baron Concept in American History" Business History Review (1958) 32#1 pp. 1–13 in JSTOR
Cochran, Thomas C. (1949) "The Legend of the Robber Barons." Explorations in Economic History 1#5 (1949) online.
Folsom, Burton W. (1991) The Myth of the Robber Barons: A New Look at the Rise of Big Business in America
Fraser, Steve. (2015). The Age of Acquiescence: The Life and Death of American Resistance to Organized Wealth and Power Little, Brown and Company. ISBN 0316185434
Jones, Peter d'A. ed. (1968). The Robber Barons Revisited (1968) excerpts from primary and secondary sources.
Josephson, Matthew. (1934). The Robber Barons: The Great American Capitalists, 1861–1901
Zinn, Howard. (2005). "Chapter 11: Robber Barons and Rebels" from A People's History of the United States Harper Perennial. ISBN 0060838655
External links[edit]
Look up robber baron in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Full Show: The New Robber Barons. Moyers & Company. December 19, 2014. Interview with historian Steve Fraser
Industrial Age in America: Robber Barons or Captains of Industry EDSITEment lesson from National Endowment for the Humanities
college-level lectures on Robber Barons
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Robber_baron_(industrialist)&oldid=810168959"
Categories:
Business terms
American businesspeople
American industrialists
History of the United States (1865–1918)
Industrial history of the United States
Social classes
Hidden categories:
CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Français
한국어
Hrvatski
Italiano
עברית
日本語
Português
Русский
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Edit links
This page was last edited on 13 November 2017, at 18:47.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Robber_baron_(disambiguation)
mw-redirect mw-disambig
Robber baron (disambiguation)

attrs: role class

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: img

attrs: href class

values:
/wiki/Cyrus_Field
mw-redirect
Cyrus Field

attrs: href title

attrs: class style

values:
/wiki/Medieval_Germany
mw-redirect
Medieval Germany

values:
/wiki/Feudal_lord
mw-redirect
Feudal lord

values:
/wiki/Alfred_D._Chandler,_Jr.
mw-redirect
Alfred D. Chandler, Jr.

values: Edit section: List of businessmen labelled as robber barons

values:
/wiki/Henry_Morrison_Flagler
mw-redirect
Henry Morrison Flagler

values:
/wiki/Mark_Hopkins_(railroad)
mw-redirect
Mark Hopkins (railroad)

values:
/wiki/Andrew_W._Mellon
mw-redirect
Andrew W. Mellon

values:
/wiki/Charles_Tyson_Yerkes
mw-redirect
Charles Tyson Yerkes

values: Category:CS1 maint: Extra text: authors list

values:
/wiki/World%27s_Work
mw-redirect
World's Work

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.jstor.org/stable/3111897

values: Category:History of the United States (1865–1918)

values: Category:Industrial history of the United States

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Robber_baron_(industrialist)
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: Barun razbojnik (industrijalac) – Croatian

values: הברונים השודדים – Hebrew

values: Бароны-разбойники – Russian

values: Barun razbojnik (industrijalac) – Serbo-Croatian

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Robber_baron_industrialist rootpage-Robber_baron_industrialist vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view