text:
Bring It On: Worldwide Cheersmack
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The correct title of this article is Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack. The substitution or omission of the # is due to technical restrictions.
Bring It On: Worldwide Cheersmack
Directed by
Robert Adetuyi
Produced by
Mike Elliott
Written by
Alyson Fouse
Starring
Cristine Prosperi
Sophie Vavasseur
Jordan Rodrigues
Vivica A. Fox
Music by
Frank Fitzpatrick
Cinematography
Trevor A. Brown
Edited by
Richard Starkey
Production
company
Beacon Pictures
Distributed by
Universal 1440 Entertainment
Release date
August 29, 2017
Running time
95 minutes
Country
United States
Language
English
Bring It On: Worldwide Cheersmack (stylized as Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack, or as Bring It On: Worldwide Showdown in UK) is a 2017 cheerleading film directed by Robert Adetuyi and the sixth installment in the Bring It On film series.[1][2] It was released direct-to-video on August 29, 2017.
Contents
1 Synopsis
2 Cast
3 Reception
4 References
5 External links
Synopsis[edit]
In an attempt to take down rival cheer squad The Truth, cheer captain Destiny decides that she will bring Blake and his male street dancers onto her squad, The Rebels. Despite best intentions, the two groups do not mesh well together initially.
Cast[edit]
Cristine Prosperi as Destiny
Sophie Vavasseur as Hannah
Jordan Rodrigues as Blake
Gia Re as Willow
Natalie Walsh as Roxanne
Vivica A. Fox as Cheer Goddess
Reception[edit]
Common Sense Media panned the film, rating it one star and writing "Obviously Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack was made on the cheap. The execution lacks flair, depth, and wit."[3] DVD Talk also reviewed the film, stating that it was "especially forgettable and loses most of the cheer in cheerleading, but I'll give it points for at least being nice to look at."[4] Cliché Magazine criticized the film's plot, but praised Vivica Fox's appearance in the film, as well as the chemistry and friendships of some of the characters.[5]
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Ellenbogen, Rachael (2017-08-24). "WATCH: 'Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack' Exclusive Final Routine Sneak Peek". International Business Times. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
Jump up ^ "Catching Up with the Cast of Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack". Justine Magazine. 2017-08-29. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
Jump up ^ Schonfeld, Renee. "Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack - Movie Review". Common Sense Media. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
Jump up ^ Skeen, Jesse. "Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack (Blu-ray)". DVD Talk. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
Jump up ^ Brown, Keah (2017-09-06). "Bring It On: Worldwide #Cheersmack Review". Cliché Magazine. Retrieved 2018-01-10.
External links[edit]
Bring It On: Worldwide Cheersmack on IMDb
hide
v
t
e
Bring It On
Films
Bring It On (2000)
Again (2004)
All or Nothing (2006)
In It to Win It (2007)
Fight to the Finish (2009)
Worldwide Cheersmack (2017)
Musical
Bring It On: The Musical
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bring_It_On:_Worldwide_Cheersmack&oldid=865779248"
Categories:
English-language films
2017 direct-to-video films
American films
Teen comedy films
Films set in South Africa
Films shot in South Africa
Cheerleading films
Bring It On (film series)
Universal Pictures direct-to-video films
Beacon Pictures films
Direct-to-video sequel films
Hidden categories:
Restricted titles
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Français
Português
Русский
Edit links
This page was last edited on 26 October 2018, at 02:43 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

values: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (technical restrictions)

values:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

value: th

attrs: colspan class style

attrs: scope style

values:
/wiki/Universal_1440_Entertainment
mw-redirect
Universal 1440 Entertainment

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values:
reflist mw-references-wrap
list-style-type: decimal;

values:
nofollow
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7014110/
external text

values:
row
navbox-group
background: #009999;width:1%

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible

values: Category:Universal Pictures direct-to-video films

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Bring_It_On:_Worldwide_Cheersmack
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Bring It On: Worldwide Cheersmack – Portuguese

values: Вперёд! Глобальное состязание чирлидеров – Russian

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Bring_It_On_Worldwide_Cheersmack rootpage-Bring_It_On_Worldwide_Cheersmack skin-vector action-view


text:
Omission (law)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the United Kingdom and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (December 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
An omission is a failure to act, which generally attracts different legal consequences from positive conduct. In the criminal law, an omission will constitute an actus reus and give rise to liability only when the law imposes a duty to act and the defendant is in breach of that duty. In tort law, similarly, liability will be imposed for an omission only exceptionally, when it can be established that the defendant was under a duty to act.
Contents
[hide]
1 Criminal law
1.1 Assumption of responsibility for care of dependents
1.2 Statutory omissions
1.3 Duty to act when the defendant has created the danger
1.4 Failure to provide medical treatment
1.5 Duty to act when contracted to do so
1.6 Preventing and prosecuting war crimes
2 Tort law
3 See also
4 References
5 Literature
Criminal law[edit]
In the criminal law, at common law, there was no general duty of care owed to fellow citizens. The traditional view was encapsulated in the example of watching a person drown in shallow water and making no rescue effort, where commentators borrowed the line, "Thou shalt not kill but needst not strive, officiously, to keep another alive." (Arthur Hugh Clough (1819–1861)) in support of the proposition that the failure to act does not attract criminal liability. Nevertheless, such failures might be morally indefensible and so both legislatures and the courts have imposed liability when the failure to act is sufficiently blameworthy to justify criminalisation. Some statutes therefore explicitly state that the actus reus consists of any relevant "act or omission", or use a word that may include both. Hence, the word "cause" may be both positive in the sense that the accused proactively injured the victim and negative in that the accused intentionally failed to act knowing that this failure would cause the relevant injury. In the courts, the trend has been to use objective tests to determine whether, in circumstances where there would have been no risk to the accused's health or well-being, the accused should have taken action to prevent a foreseeable injury being sustained by a particular victim or one from a class of potential victims.[citation needed]
So, returning to the drowning example, the accused would be liable if the victim was a child in a pool with a water depth of six inches, or there was a floatation device nearby that could easily be thrown to the victim, or the accused was carrying a mobile phone that could be used to summon help. However, the law will never penalise someone for not jumping into a raging torrent of water, i.e. the law does not require the potential saver to risk drowning even though the individual might be a lifeguard paid to patrol the given beach, river or pool. No matter what the terms of employment, an employee can never be required to do more than what is reasonable in all the circumstances. In R v Dytham (1979) QB 722 an on-duty police officer stood and watched a man beaten to death outside a nightclub. He then left without calling for assistance or summoning an ambulance. He was convicted of the common law offence of wilful misconduct in public office. Widgery CJ said:
The allegation was not one of mere non-feasance, but of deliberate failure and wilful neglect. This involves an element of culpability which is not restricted to corruption or dishonesty, but which must be of such a degree that the misconduct impugned is calculated to injure the public interest so as to call for condemnation and punishment.
In the Attorney General's Reference (No 3 of 2003) (2004) EWCA Crim 868[1] police officers arrested a man with head injuries for a breach of the peace because of his abusive and aggressive behaviour towards the hospital staff who were trying to treat him. He later stopped breathing in the police station and all attempts at resuscitation failed. Five police officers, who were involved in the care of A at the time of his death, were charged with manslaughter by gross negligence and misconduct in a public office. It was held that the latter offence required that a public officer was acting as such, that he wilfully neglected to perform his duty and/or wilfully misconducted himself in a way which amounted to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder, without reasonable excuse or justification; that whether the misconduct was of a sufficiently serious nature would depend upon the responsibilities of the office and the office holder, the importance of the public objects which they served, the nature and extent of the departure from those responsibilities and the seriousness of the consequences which might follow from the misconduct; that to establish the mens rea (Latin for "guilty mind") of the offence, it had to be proved that the office holder was aware of the duty to act or was subjectively reckless as to the existence of the duty; that the test of recklessness applied both to the question whether in particular circumstances a duty arose at all and to the conduct of the defendant if it did arise; and that the subjective test applied both to reckless indifference to the legality of the act or omission and in relation to the consequences of the act or omission.[citation needed]
Assumption of responsibility for care of dependents[edit]
The general rule is that parents, legal guardians, spouses (see R v Smith (1979) CLR 251 where the wife died after giving birth to a stillborn child, delivered by her husband at home) and anyone who voluntarily agrees to care for another who is dependent because of age, illness or other infirmity, may incur a duty, at least until care can be handed over to someone else. In three cases, the duty was implied:
R v Instan (1893) 1 QB 450, Instan lived with her aunt, who was suddenly taken ill and could no longer feed herself or call for help. She was convicted of manslaughter because she neither fed her aunt, nor called for medical help, even though she continued to stay in the house and ate her aunt's food.
R v Stone & Dobinson (1977) QB 354. Stone and his mistress agreed to care for his sister who was suffering from anorexia. As her condition deteriorated, she became bed-ridden but no help was summoned and she died. They were convicted of her manslaughter because they had accepted her into their home and so assumed a duty of care for her.
R v Gibbins & Proctor (1918) 13 Cr App Rep 134. A father and his lover neglected his child by failing to feed her. The lover had taken on a duty to care for the child when moving into the house and was under an obligation to care for her.
Statutory omissions[edit]
Misprision of felony was abolished in 1967 but new statutory offences of failure to comply with a duty to disclose terrorist acts or funding under s19(2) Terrorism Act 2000, and failure to disclose knowledge or suspicion of money laundering maintain the tradition. Similarly, the appropriation element in s1 theft may be committed by an act or by keeping when there is a duty to return the property, a deception under s15(4) Theft Act 1968 may be committed by what is not said or done, and "dishonestly secures" under s2(1) Theft Act 1978 may also be committed by omission (see R v Firth (1990) CLR 326 in which the defendant failed to tell the NHS that patients using NHS facilities were in fact private patients thereby obtaining the use of the facilities without payment). One of the simpler examples is the offence of failing to report a road traffic accident (s. 170 Road Traffic Act 1988).[citation needed]
Duty to act when the defendant has created the danger[edit]
A person who creates a dangerous situation may be under a duty to take reasonable steps to avert that danger. In R v Miller (1983) 2 AC 161, the defendant was sleeping rough in a building. He fell asleep on his mattress while smoking a cigarette. When he woke, he found that the mattress was smouldering but, instead of calling for help, he simply moved into another room. This allowed the fire to spread. He was convicted under the Criminal Damage Act 1971 for recklessly causing damage by omission. Lord Diplock said:
...I see no rational ground for excluding from conduct capable of giving rise to criminal liability, conduct which consists of failing to take measures that lie within one's power to counteract a danger that one has oneself created, if at the time of such conduct one's state of mind is such as constitutes a necessary ingredient of the offence.
But although this may apply to the generality of offences, "constructive manslaughter" is different. R v Lowe (1973) QB 702, the defendant committed the offence of neglecting his child under s1 Children and Young Persons Act 1933, and this caused the child's death. It was held that there should be a difference between commission and omission. Mere neglect without some foresight of the possibility of harm resulting is not a ground of constructive manslaughter, even if that omission is deliberate. R v Khan & Khan (1998) CLR 830, confirmed that there is no separate category of manslaughter by omission unless the omission constitutes a breach of duty to act. The defendants supplied a 15-year-old prostitute with twice the amount of heroin likely to be taken by a regular user. The defendants left her unconscious in the flat, returning the next day to find that she had died of the overdose. Had medical assistance been called, the girl would probably not have died. The unlawful act was supplying the drug but the death was caused by the quantity injected by the victim. The trial judge invited jury to consider liability on the basis of the defendants' failure to summon medical assistance. On appeal, the conviction was quashed because the brothers had not accepted a duty to act before she took the heroin.[citation needed]
Failure to provide medical treatment[edit]
In general terms, doctors and hospitals have a duty to provide appropriate care for their patients, and an omission may breach that duty except where an adult patient of ordinary capacity terminates the duty by refusing consent. There is a conflict in public policy. The policy of patient autonomy enshrines a right of self-determination—patients have a right to live their lives how they wish, even if it will damage their health or lead to premature death. Society’s interest is in upholding the concept that all human life is sacred and should be preserved if at all possible. It is now well established that the right of the individual is paramount. In Re C (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) (1994) 1 WLR 290, a patient diagnosed as a chronic, paranoid schizophrenic refused to allow his gangrenous foot to be amputated. This was permitted because his general capacity showed him capable of understanding the nature, purpose and effect of the life-saving treatment. In Re B (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment) (2002) 2 AER 449 the presumption that an adult has full capacity can be rebutted if:
(a) the person is unable to understand the information relevant to the decision, especially as to the likely consequences of having or not having the treatment; or
(b) the patient is unable to use the information and weigh it in the balance as part of the process of arriving at a decision.
Ms B was a competent but paralysed, ventilator-dependent patient, and she won the right to have the ventilator turned off. Although the switching-off had to be performed by a doctor, and this is an act intentionally causing death, the law characterises this as an omission because it amounts simply to a cessation of the ongoing treatment. The doctors’ conduct qualifies as lawful "passive euthanasia". If the particular doctor invited to omit further treatment has conscientious objections, a doctor who will undertake the omission should be sought. But, in more general cases of necessity, urgent surgery may not be unlawful to preserve life pending any judicial decision. Similarly, when the patient is a minor, emergency treatment to preserve life will not be unlawful (note the power to refer issues of consent to the courts under their wardship jurisdiction).
In death with dignity situations where a patient is incapable of communicating his wishes, a doctor may be relieved of his duty, as the House of Lords recognised in Airedale National Health Service Trust v Bland (1993) AC 789. Here a patient who had survived for three years in a persistent vegetative state after suffering irreversible brain damage in the Hillsborough disaster continued to breathe normally, but was kept alive only by being fed through tubes. It was held that treatment could properly be withdrawn in such circumstances, because the best interests of the patient did not involve him being kept alive at all costs. Lord Goff nevertheless drew a fundamental distinction between acts and omissions in this context:
. . . the law draws a crucial distinction between cases in which a doctor decides not to provide, or to continue to provide, for his patient treatment or care which could or might prolong his life, and those in which he decides, for example by administering a lethal drug, actively to bring his patient's life to an end . . . the former may be lawful, either because the doctor is giving effect to his patient's wishes . . . or even in certain circumstances in which . . . the patient is incapacitated from stating whether or not he gives his consent. But it is not lawful for a doctor to administer a drug to his patient to bring about his death, even though that course is prompted by a humanitarian desire to end his suffering, however great that suffering may be.
Duty to act when contracted to do so[edit]
In R v Pittwood (1902), the defendant was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter after he failed to close the gate on a level crossing as he was contracted to do. This caused a train to collide with a hay cart, and the court ruled that "a man might incur criminal liability from a duty arising out of contract."
Preventing and prosecuting war crimes[edit]
Following the Nuremberg Trials international law developed the concept of command responsibility. It holds that military commanders are imposed with individual responsibility for war crimes, committed by forces under their effective command and control, they failed to prevent or adequately prosecute, if they:
"either knew or, owing to the circumstances at the time, should have known that the forces were committing or about to commit such crimes."[2][3][4]
Tort law[edit]
In the law of negligence, if the defendant's conduct took the form of an omission, rather than a positive act, then it will be more difficult to establish that she owed a duty of care to the plaintiff. The rationale is that a positive duty is more onerous to fulfill than a negative duty, and therefore limits more severely the liberty of the duty-bearer.[5][6]
See also[edit]
Duty to rescue
Sin of omission
References[edit]
Jump up ^ http://uniset.ca/other/css/2005QB73.html
Jump up ^ Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility Archived 2007-06-10 at the Wayback Machine. by Kai Ambos, Professor of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Comparative Law and International Criminal Law at the University of Göttingen; Judge at the State Court (Landgericht) Göttingen, Journal of International Criminal Justice, originally published online on January 25, 2007
Jump up ^ "E LAW - Command Responsibility and Superior Orders in the Twentieth Century - A Century of Evolution - Text".
Jump up ^ Command Responsibility The Mens Rea Requirement, By Eugenia Levine, Global Policy Forum, February 2005
Jump up ^ "Stovin v Wise".
Jump up ^ Honoré, Tony (1991). "Are Omissions Less Culpable?".
Literature[edit]
Allen, Michael. Textbook on Criminal Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford. (2005) ISBN 0-19-927918-7.
Ashworth, A. "The scope of criminal liability for omissions" (1989) 105 LQR 404
Beynon, Causation, Omissions and Complicity, (1987) CLR 539.
Finnis, Bland: Crossing the Rubicon, (1993) 109 LQR 329.
Ormerod, David. Smith and Hogan Criminal Law, LexisNexis, London. (2005) ISBN 0-406-97730-5
Murphy, Beneficence, Law, and Liberty: The Case of Required Rescue, (2001) Col. 89 Georgetown Law Journal, 605.
Smith, Legal Liability and Criminal Omission, (2001) Vol 5 Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 69.
[hide]
v
t
e
English criminal law
Classes of crimes
Common law
Indictable
Either way
Summary
Regulatory
Lesser included
Elements of crimes
Actus reus
Causation
Mens rea
Intention (criminal law)
Intention in English law
Recklessness
Criminal negligence
Corporate / Vicarious / Strict liability
Omissions
Concurrence
Ignorantia juris non excusat
Inchoate offences
Encouraging or assisting a crime
Conspiracy
Accessory
Attempt
Common purpose
Defences
Self-defence
Duress
Necessity
Marital coercion
Consent
Medical procedure
Prevention of crime
Participation in a sporting event
Lawful excuse
Insanity
Diminished responsibility
Intoxication
Category:Criminal defences
Offences against the person
Homicide (Murder / Manslaughter / Corporate manslaughter / Infanticide)
Manslaughter in English law
Unlawful killing
Mayhem
Concealing birth
Child destruction
Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm
Assault occasioning actual bodily harm
Common assault
Attempting to choke, &c. in order to commit any indictable offence
Assault with intent to rob
Robbery
Assault with intent to rape
Assault with intent to commit felony, or on peace officers
Assault with intent to resist lawful apprehension
Buggery
Battery
Kidnapping
Child abduction
False imprisonment
Harassment
Offences Against the Person Act 1861
Sexual offences
Rape
Sexual assault
Sexual Offences Act 2003
Public order offences
Riot
Violent disorder
Affray
Unlawful assembly
Fear or provocation of violence
Intentional harassment, alarm or distress
Harassment, alarm or distress
Public Order Act 1986
Incitement to ethnic or racial hatred
Challenging to a fight
Nuisance
Causing Public nuisance
Outraging public decency
Effecting a public mischief
Keeping a disorderly house
Preventing the lawful burial of a body
Breach of the peace
Treason
High treason
Common scold
Nightwalker statute
Rout
Forcible entry
Accessory (legal term)
Misconduct in a public office
Misfeasance in public office
Abuse of authority
Perjury of oath
Dereliction of duty
Offences against property
Arson
Dishonesty
Cheating (law)
Burglary
Robbery
Theft
Larceny
Criminal damage
Squatting
Trespass
Taking without owner's consent
Deception
Handling stolen goods
Misappropriation of funds
Blackmail
Extortion
Cybercrime
Theft Act 1968
Theft Act 1978
Fraud Act 2006
Fraud by abuse of position
Conspiracy to defraud
Fare evasion
Webcam blackmail
Forgery, personation and cheating
Forgery
Cheating the public revenue
Uttering
Offences against justice
Bribery
Perjury
Offences Akin to Perjury
Perverting the course of justice
Misrepresentation as to identity
Embracery
Witness intimidation
Witness tampering
Harming People who have Assisted the Police / Given Evidence / Been a Juror
Misprision of treason
Misprision of felony
Compounding a felony
Jury tampering
Assault with intent to resist lawful apprehension
Assisting an offender
Harboring a fugitive
Encouraging or assisting a crime
Escape from lawful custody
Obstruction of justice
Obstruction of a police officer
Wasting police time
Refusing to assist a constable
Sedition
Espionage
Contempt of the sovereign
Contempt of court
Fabrication of false evidence
Breach of prison / breaking prison
Rescuing a prisoner
Other common law areas
Contract
Tort
Property
Wills
Trusts and estates
Evidence
Criminal procedure
History
Law of England and Wales portal
Criminal Justice portal
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Omission_(law)&oldid=828548912"
Categories:
Criminal law
Elements of crime
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
Articles with limited geographic scope from December 2010
United Kingdom-centric
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2008
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Español
한국어
Italiano
Қазақша
Кыргызча
Português
Русский
Svenska
Edit links
This page was last edited on 3 March 2018, at 07:17.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

value: td

attrs: href title

values: Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias

value: b

attrs: class href

value: span

value: i

value: small

value: tr

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-globalize

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2008)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values: Edit section: Assumption of responsibility for care of dependents

values: Edit section: Duty to act when the defendant has created the danger

values:
/wiki/Criminal_Damage_Act_1971
mw-redirect
Criminal Damage Act 1971

values: Edit section: Failure to provide medical treatment

values:
/wiki/Public_policy_(law)
mw-redirect
Public policy (law)

values:
/wiki/Necessity_in_English_law
mw-redirect
Necessity in English law

values:
/wiki/Ward_(legal)
mw-redirect
Ward (legal)

values: Edit section: Duty to act when contracted to do so

values: Edit section: Preventing and prosecuting war crimes

values:
/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials
mw-redirect
Nuremberg Trials

values: Journal of International Criminal Justice (page does not exist)

values: Template talk:English criminal law navbox

values: Encouraging or assisting a crime in English law

values:
/wiki/Sporting_event
mw-redirect
Sporting event

values:
/wiki/Lawful_excuse
mw-redirect
Lawful excuse

values: Diminished responsibility in English law

values:
/wiki/Assault_with_intent_to_rob
mw-redirect
Assault with intent to rob

values: Assault with intent to rape (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Effecting_a_public_mischief
mw-redirect
Effecting a public mischief

values:
/wiki/Misconduct_in_a_public_office
mw-redirect
Misconduct in a public office

values:
/wiki/Fraud_by_abuse_of_position
mw-redirect
Fraud by abuse of position

values:
/wiki/Cheating_the_public_revenue
mw-redirect
Cheating the public revenue

values:
/wiki/Witness_intimidation
mw-redirect
Witness intimidation

values: Harboring a fugitive (page does not exist)

values: Escape from lawful custody (page does not exist)

values: Breach of prison / breaking prison (page does not exist)

values: Rescuing a prisoner (page does not exist)

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Articles with limited geographic scope from December 2010

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2008

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Omission_(law)
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: Қылмыстық әрекетсіздік – Kazakh

values: Аракетсиздик – Kyrgyz

values: Преступное бездействие – Russian

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Omission_law rootpage-Omission_law skin-vector action-view