text:
Rationale for the Iraq War
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
show
v
t
e
Iraq War
Timeline
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Invasion (2003)
Umm Qasr
Al Faw
1st Basra
Nasiriyah
Raid on Karbala
Haditha Dam
1st Najaf
Northern Delay
Viking Hammer
Samawah
1st Karbala
Al Kut
Hillah
Green Line
Karbala Gap
Baghdad
Debecka Pass
Kani Domlan Ridge
Post-invasion insurgency (2003–06)
Al Anbar
1st Ramadan
Red Dawn
Spring 2004
Al Kut
1st Fallujah
Sadr City
1st Ramadi
Husaybah
Danny Boy
2nd Najaf
CIMIC-House
Samarra
2nd Fallujah
Mosul
Lake Tharthar
Al Qaim
Hit
Haditha
Steel Curtain
Tal Afar
2nd Ramadi
Together Forward
Diwaniya
Sectarian violence (2006–08)
2nd Ramadan
Sinbad
Amarah
Turki
Diyala
Haifa Street
Karbala Raid
3rd Najaf
Imposing Law
U.K. bases
Black Eagle
Baghdad belts
Baqubah
Donkey Island
Shurta Nasir
Phantom Strike
2nd Karbala
Phantom Phoenix
Insurgency (2008–11)
2008 Day of Ashura
Ninawa
Spring 2008
2nd Basra
2008 Al-Qaeda Offensive
Augurs of Prosperity
Abu Kamal
Camp Ashraf
Palm Grove
US withdrawal violence
show
v
t
e
Insurgent attacks of the Iraq War
‡ indicates attacks resulting in over 100 deaths
§ indicates the deadliest attack in the Iraq War
This list only includes major attacks.
2003
1st Baghdad
2nd Baghdad
Najaf
3rd Baghdad
1st Nasiriyah
1st Karbala
2004
‡ 1st Erbil
‡ Ashoura
1st Basra
Mosul (2004)
4th Baghdad
5th Baghdad
Karbala-Najaf
1st Baqubah
Kufa
FOB Marez
2005
Suwaira bombing
‡ 1st Al Hillah
2nd Erbil
‡ Musayyib
6th Baghdad
‡ 7th Baghdad
1st Balad
Khanaqin
2006
‡ Karbala-Ramadi
1st Samarra
8th Baghdad
9th Baghdad
‡ 10th Baghdad
2007
11th Baghdad
12th Baghdad
‡ 13th Baghdad
14th Baghdad
15th Baghdad
2nd Al Hillah
‡ 1st Tal Afar
16th Baghdad
17th Baghdad
2nd & 3rd Karbala
Mosul (2007)
‡ 18th Baghdad
Makhmour
Abu Sayda
2nd Samarra
19th Baghdad
‡ Amirli
1st Kirkuk
20th Baghdad
21st Baghdad
§ Qahtaniya
Amarah
2008
22nd Baghdad
2nd Balad
23rd Baghdad
4th Karbala
24th Baghdad
Karmah
2nd Baqubah
Dujail
Balad Ruz
2009
25th Baghdad
26th Baghdad
Baghdad-Muqdadiyah
Taza
27th Baghdad
2nd Kirkuk
2nd Tal Afar
‡ 28th Baghdad
‡ 29th Baghdad
‡ 30th Baghdad
2010
31st Baghdad
32nd Baghdad
3rd Baqubah
33rd Baghdad
34th Baghdad
35th Baghdad
‡ 1st Pan-Iraq
36th Baghdad
37th Baghdad
2nd Pan-Iraq
38th Baghdad
39th Baghdad
‡ 40th Baghdad
2011
41st Baghdad
‡ 3rd Pan-Iraq
Karbala-Baghdad
42nd Baghdad
Tikrit
3rd Al Hillah
3rd Samarra
Al Diwaniyah
Taji
4th Pan-Iraq
43rd Baghdad
4th Karbala
44th Baghdad
2nd Basra
45th Baghdad
show
v
t
e
Persian Gulf Wars
Iranian Revolution (1978–79)
Iran–Iraq War (1980–88)
Invasion of Kuwait (1990)
Gulf War (1990–91)
Iraqi Kurdish/Shi'a uprisings (1991)
Iraq no-fly zones conflict (1991–2003)
Iraq missile strikes (1993)
Iraq missile strikes (1996)
Iraq bombing (1998)
1999 Shia uprising in Iraq
Iraq conflict (2003–present)
Iraq War (2003–11)
Iraqi insurgency (2011–13)
Iraqi Civil War (2014–2017)
A UN weapons inspector in Iraq.
February 5, 2003 - United States Secretary of State Colin Powell holding a model vial of anthrax while giving the presentation to the United Nations Security Council.
The rationale for the Iraq War (i.e. the 2003 invasion of Iraq and subsequent hostilities) has been a contentious issue since the Bush administration began actively pressing for military intervention in Iraq in late 2001. The primary rationalization for the Iraq War was articulated by a joint resolution of the U.S. Congress known as the Iraq Resolution.
The U.S. stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world."[1] For the invasion of Iraq the rationale was "the United States relied on the authority of UN Security Council Resolutions 678 and 687 to use all necessary means to compel Iraq to comply with its international obligations".[2]
In the lead-up to the invasion, the U.S. and UK emphasized the argument that Saddam Hussein was developing weapons of mass destruction and that he thus presented a threat to his neighbors and to the world community. The U.S. stated "on November 8, 2002, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1441. All fifteen members of the Security Council agreed to give Iraq a final opportunity to comply with its obligations and disarm or face the serious consequences of failing to disarm. The resolution strengthened the mandate of the UN Monitoring and Verification Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), giving them authority to go anywhere, at any time and talk to anyone in order to verify Iraq's disarmament."[3] Throughout late 2001, 2002, and early 2003, the Bush Administration worked to build a case for invading Iraq, culminating in then Secretary of State Colin Powell's February 2003 address to the Security Council.[4] Shortly after the invasion, the Central Intelligence Agency, Defense Intelligence Agency, and other intelligence agencies largely discredited evidence related to Iraqi weapons as well as links to Al-Qaeda, and at this point the Bush and Blair Administrations began to shift to secondary rationales for the war, such as the Hussein government's human rights record and promoting democracy in Iraq.[5][6] Opinion polls showed that people of nearly all countries opposed a war without UN mandate and that the view of the United States as a danger to world peace had significantly increased.[7][8] UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan described the war as illegal, saying in a September 2004 interview that it was "not in conformity with the Security Council."[9]
Accusations of faulty evidence and alleged shifting rationales became the focal point for critics of the war, who charge that the Bush Administration purposely fabricated evidence to justify an invasion that it had long planned to launch.[10] The U.S. led the effort for "the redirection of former Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) scientists, technicians and engineers to civilian employment and discourage emigration of this community from Iraq."[11]
The United States officially declared its combat role in Iraq over on August 31, 2010, although several thousand troops remained in the country until all American troops were withdrawn from Iraq by December 2011; meanwhile American troops also engaged in combat with Iraqi insurgents. In June 2014, however, U.S. forces were reinstated in Iraq due to the escalation of instability in the region and as of June 2015, the number of American ground troops totaled to 3,550. Between December 2011 and June 2014, Department of Defense officials estimated that there were 200 to 300 personnel based at the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.[12]
Contents
1 Background
1.1 Iraq War Resolution
2 Weapons of mass destruction
2.1 U.N. inspections before the invasion
2.2 Formal search after the invasion
2.3 Discovery of chemical weapons
2.4 Conclusions
3 Iraqi links to terrorist organizations
3.1 Al-Qaeda
3.2 Other terrorist organizations
4 Human rights
4.1 United Nations
4.2 Ending sanctions
5 Oil
5.1 Oil not a factor in the Iraq war
5.2 Oil a factor in the Iraq war
5.2.1 Private oil business
5.2.2 Strategic importance of oil
5.2.3 Oil and foreign relations
6 Combating terrorism
7 Other rationales
7.1 Bringing democracy to the Middle East
7.2 Establishing long term Middle East military presence
7.3 Divine inspiration
7.4 Purported Iraqi intelligence plots
7.4.1 Alleged terrorist links
7.5 Pressuring Saudi Arabia
8 Criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq war
9 See also
10 References
11 External links
Background[edit]
The 1991 Gulf War never fully ended because no armistice formally ended it. As a result, relations between the United States, the United Nations, and Iraq remained strained, although Saddam Hussein issued formal statements renouncing his invasion of Kuwait and made reparations payments for Kuwait. The U.S. and the United Nations maintained a policy of "containment" towards Iraq, which involved economic sanctions, Iraqi no-fly zones enforced by the United States, United Kingdom, and France (until ending its no-fly zone operations in 1998) and ongoing inspections of Iraqi weapons programs.[2] In 2002, the UN Security Council unanimously passed Resolution 1441 demanding that Iraq "comply with its disarmament obligations" and allow weapons inspections. Iraq war critics such as former weapons inspector Scott Ritter claimed that these sanctions and weapons inspections policies, supported by both the Bush and Clinton administrations, were actually intended to foster regime change in Iraq.[13]
U.S. policy shifted in 1998 when the United States Congress passed and President Bill Clinton signed the "Iraq Liberation Act" after Iraq terminated its cooperation with U.N. weapons inspectors the preceding August. The act made it official U.S. policy to "support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power..." although it also made clear that "nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise speak to the use of United States Armed Forces."[14][15] This legislation contrasted with the terms set out in United Nations Security Council Resolution 687, which made no mention of regime change.[16]
One month after the passage of the "Iraq Liberation Act," the U.S. and UK launched a bombardment campaign of Iraq called Operation Desert Fox. The campaign's express rationale was to hamper the Hussein government's ability to produce chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons, but U.S. national security personnel also reportedly hoped it would help weaken Hussein's grip on power.[17]
The Republican Party's campaign platform in the 2000 election called for "full implementation" of the Iraq Liberation Act and removal of Saddam Hussein; and key Bush advisers, including Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and Rumsfeld's Deputy Paul Wolfowitz, were longstanding advocates of invading Iraq, and contributed to a September 2000 report from the Project for the New American Century that argued for using an invasion of Iraq as a means for the U.S. to "play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security..."[18] After leaving the administration, former Bush treasury secretary Paul O'Neill said that "contingency planning" for an attack on Iraq was planned since the inauguration and that the first National Security Council meeting involved discussion of an invasion.[19] Retired Army Gen. Hugh Shelton, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he saw nothing to indicate the United States was close to attacking Iraq early in Bush's term.[19]
Despite key Bush advisers' stated interest in invading Iraq, little formal movement towards an invasion occurred until the September 11, 2001 attacks. According to aides who were with Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in the National Military Command Center on September 11, Rumsfeld asked for: "best info fast. Judge whether good enough hit Saddam Hussein at same time. Not only Osama bin Laden." The notes also quote him as saying, "Go massive", and "Sweep it all up. Things related and not."[20]
Excerpt from Donald Rumsfeld memo dated November 27, 2001 [21]
In the days immediately following 9/11, the Bush Administration national security team actively debated an invasion of Iraq. A memo written by Sec. Rumsfeld dated November 27, 2001 considers a US-Iraq war. One section of the memo questions "How start?", listing multiple possible justifications for a US-Iraq War.[21] That administration opted instead to limit the initial military response to Afghanistan.[22] In January 2002, President Bush began laying the public groundwork for an invasion of Iraq, calling Iraq a member of the Axis of Evil and saying "The United States of America will not permit the world's most dangerous regimes to threaten us with the world's most destructive weapons."[23] Over the next year, the Bush Administration began pushing for international support for an invasion of Iraq, a campaign that culminated in Secretary of State Colin Powell's February 5, 2003 presentation to the United Nations Security Council.[24][25] After failing to gain U.N. support for an additional UN authorization, the U.S., together with the UK and small contingents from Australia, Poland, and Denmark, launched an invasion on March 20, 2003 under the authority of UN Security Council Resolutions 660 and 678.[2]
Iraq War Resolution[edit]
President George Bush, surrounded by leaders of the House and Senate, announces the Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq, October 2, 2002.
The October 2002, U.S. congress Iraq War Resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq:
Iraq's noncompliance with the conditions of the 1991 ceasefire agreement, including interference with U.N. weapons inspectors.
Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction, and programs to develop such weapons, posed a "threat to the national security of the United States and international peace and security in the Persian Gulf region."
Iraq's "brutal repression of its civilian population."
Iraq's "capability and willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations and its own people".
Iraq's hostility towards the United States as demonstrated by the 1993 assassination attempt on former President George H. W. Bush and firing on coalition aircraft enforcing the no-fly zones following the 1991 Gulf War.
Members of Al-Qaeda, an organization bearing responsibility for attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in Iraq.
Iraq's "continuing to aid and harbor other international terrorist organizations," including anti-United States terrorist organizations.
Iraq paid bounty to families of suicide bombers.
The efforts by the Congress and the President to fight terrorists, including the September 11, 2001 terrorists and those who aided or harbored them.
The authorization by the Constitution and the Congress for the President to fight anti-United States terrorism.
The governments in Turkey, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia feared Saddam and wanted him removed from power.
Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.
The Resolution required President Bush's diplomatic efforts at the U.N. Security Council to "obtain prompt and decisive action by the Security Council to ensure that Iraq abandons its strategy of delay, evasion, and noncompliance and promptly and strictly complies with all relevant Security Council resolutions." It authorized the United States to use military force to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions regarding Iraq."
Weapons of mass destruction[edit]
See also: Iraq disarmament crisis and Iraq and weapons of mass destruction
Computer-generated image of an alleged mobile production facility for biological weapons, presented by Colin Powell at the UN Security Council. Absence of more substantial proof undermined the credibility of the speech on the international scene. Russian experts questioned the likelihood of such mobile facilities, which are extremely dangerous and difficult to manage.
The U.S. government's belief that Iraq was developing Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs), was based upon documents which the CIA argued could not be trusted.[26]
George Bush, speaking in October 2002, said that "The stated policy of the United States is regime change… However, if [Hussein] were to meet all the conditions of the United Nations, the conditions that I have described very clearly in terms that everybody can understand, that in itself will signal the regime has changed."[27] Similarly, in September 2002, Tony Blair stated, in an answer to a parliamentary question, that "Regime change in Iraq would be a wonderful thing. That is not the purpose of our action; our purpose is to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction…"[28] In November of that year, Tony Blair further stated that "So far as our objective, it is disarmament, not regime change—that is our objective. Now I happen to believe the regime of Saddam is a very brutal and repressive regime, I think it does enormous damage to the Iraqi people ... so I have got no doubt Saddam is very bad for Iraq, but on the other hand I have got no doubt either that the purpose of our challenge from the United Nations is disarmament of weapons of mass destruction, it is not regime change."[29] At a press conference on January 31, 2003, George Bush stated: "Saddam Hussein must understand that if he does not disarm, for the sake of peace, we, along with others, will go disarm Saddam Hussein."[30] As late as February 25, 2003, Tony Blair said to the House of Commons: "I detest his regime. But even now he can save it by complying with the UN's demand. Even now, we are prepared to go the extra step to achieve disarmament peacefully."[31]
As Secretary of State Powell summarized in his February 5, 2003 presentation to the U.N. Security Council, "the facts and Iraq's behavior show that Saddam Hussein and his regime are concealing their efforts to produce more weapons of mass destruction."[32] On February 11, 2003, FBI Director Robert Mueller testified to Congress that "Iraq has moved to the top of my list. As we previously briefed this Committee, Iraq's WMD program poses a clear threat to our national security, a threat that will certainly increase in the event of future military action against Iraq. Baghdad has the capability and, we presume, the will to use biological, chemical, or radiological weapons against US domestic targets in the event of a US invasion."[33][34] On April 10, 2003, White House press secretary Ari Fleischer reiterated that, "But make no mistake—as I said earlier—we have high confidence that they have weapons of mass destruction. That is what this war was about and it is about. And we have high confidence it will be found."[35] Despite the Bush Administration's consistent assertion that Iraqi weapons programs justified an invasion, former Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz later cast doubt on the Administration's conviction behind this rationale by saying in a May 2003 interview: "For bureaucratic reasons, we settled on one issue—weapons of mass destruction—because it was the one reason everyone could agree on."[36]
After the invasion, despite an exhaustive search led by the Iraq Survey Group involving a more than 1,400 member team, no evidence of Iraqi weapons programs was found. On the contrary, the investigation concluded that Iraq had destroyed all major stockpiles of WMDs and ceased production in 1991 when sanctions were imposed.[37][38][39] The failure to find evidence of Iraqi weapons programs following the invasion led to considerable controversy in the United States and worldwide, including claims by critics of the war that the Bush and Blair Administrations deliberately manipulated and misused intelligence to push for an invasion.
U.N. inspections before the invasion[edit]
Between 1991 and 1998, the United Nations Security Council tasked the United Nations Special Commission on Disarmament (UNSCOM) with finding and destroying Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. In 1996, UNSCOM discovered evidence of continued biological weapons research and supervised destruction of the Al Hakam biological weapons production site—allegedly converted to a chicken feed plant, but retaining its barbed wire fences and antiaircraft defenses.[40][41] In 1998, Scott Ritter, leader of a UNSCOM inspection team, found gaps in the prisoner records of Abu Ghraib when investigating allegations that prisoners had been used to test Anthrax weapons. Asked to explain the missing documents, the Iraqi government charged that Ritter was working for the CIA and refused to cooperate further with UNSCOM.
On August 26, 1998, approximately two months before the U.S. ordered United Nations inspectors withdrawn from Iraq, Scott Ritter resigned from his position rather than participate in what he called the "illusion of arms control." In his resignation letter to Ambassador Butler,[42] Ritter wrote: "The sad truth is that Iraq today is not disarmed. ... UNSCOM has good reason to believe that there are significant numbers of proscribed weapons and related components and the means to manufacture such weapons unaccounted for in Iraq today … Iraq has lied to the Special Commission and the world since day one concerning the true scope and nature of its proscribed programs and weapons systems." On September 7, 1998, in testimony to the Senate Armed Services and Foreign Relations Committee,[43] Scott Ritter was asked by John McCain (R, AZ) whether UNSCOM had intelligence suggesting that Iraq had assembled the components for three nuclear weapons and all that it lacked was the fissile material. Ritter replied: "The Special Commission has intelligence information, which suggests that components necessary for three nuclear weapons exists, lacking the fissile material. Yes, sir."
On November 8, 2002, the U.N. Security Council passed Resolution 1441, giving Iraq "a final opportunity to comply with its disarmament obligations" including unrestricted inspections by the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Saddam Hussein accepted the resolution on November 13 and inspectors returned to Iraq under the direction of UNMOVIC chairman Hans Blix and IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei. Between that time and the time of the invasion, the IAEA "found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapons programme in Iraq"; the IAEA concluded that certain items which could have been used in nuclear enrichment centrifuges, such as aluminum tubes, were in fact intended for other uses.[44] UNMOVIC "did not find evidence of the continuation or resumption of programmes of weapons of mass destruction" or significant quantities of proscribed items. UNMOVIC did supervise the destruction of a small number of empty chemical rocket warheads, 50 liters of mustard gas that had been declared by Iraq and sealed by UNSCOM in 1998, and laboratory quantities of a mustard gas precursor, along with about 50 Al-Samoud missiles of a design that Iraq claimed did not exceed the permitted 150 km range, but which had travelled up to 183 km in tests. Shortly before the invasion, UNMOVIC stated that it would take "months" to verify Iraqi compliance with resolution 1441.[45][46][47]
Formal search after the invasion[edit]
After the invasion, the Iraq Survey Group (ISG), headed by American David Kay, was tasked with searching for WMD. The survey ultimately concluded that Iraqi production of WMD ceased and all major stockpiles were destroyed in 1991 when economic sanctions were imposed, but that the expertise to restart production once sanctions were lifted was preserved. The group also concluded that Iraq continued developing long range missiles proscribed by the U.N. until just before the 2003 invasion.[citation needed]
In an interim report on October 3, 2003, Kay reported that the group had "not yet found stocks of weapons", but had discovered "dozens of WMD-related program activities" including clandestine laboratories "suitable for continuing CBW [chemical and biological warfare] research", a prison laboratory complex "possibly used in human testing of BW agents", a vial of live C. botulinum Okra B bacteria kept in one scientist's home, small parts and twelve-year-old documents "that would have been useful in resuming uranium enrichment", partially declared UAVs and undeclared fuel for Scud missiles with ranges beyond the 150 km U.N. limits, "[p]lans and advanced design work for new long-range missiles with ranges up to at least 1000 km", attempts to acquire long range missile technology from North Korea, and document destruction in headquarters buildings in Baghdad. None of the WMD programs involved active production; they instead appeared to be targeted at retaining the expertise needed to resume work once sanctions were dropped. Iraqi personnel involved with much of this work indicated they had orders to conceal it from U.N. weapons inspectors.[48][49]
After Charles Duelfer took over from Kay in January 2004, Kay said at a Senate hearing that "we were almost all wrong" about Iraq having stockpiles of WMD, but that the other ISG findings made Iraq potentially "more dangerous" than was thought before the war.[50][51] In an interview, Kay said that "a lot" of the former Iraqi government's WMD program had been moved to Syria shortly before the 2003 invasion, albeit not including large stockpiles of weapons.[52]
On September 30, 2004, the ISG, under Charles Duelfer, issued a comprehensive report. The report stated that "Iraq's WMD capability … was essentially destroyed in 1991" and that Saddam Hussein subsequently focused on ending the sanctions and "preserving the capability to reconstitute his weapons of mass destruction (WMD) when sanctions were lifted". No evidence was found for continued active production of WMD subsequent to the imposition of sanctions in 1991, though "[b]y 2000–2001, Saddam had managed to mitigate many of the effects of sanctions".[53]
The report concluded in its Key Findings that: "Saddam [Hussein] so dominated the Iraqi Regime that its strategic intent was his alone... The former Regime had no formal written strategy or plan for the revival of WMD after sanctions. Neither was there an identifiable group of WMD policy makers or planners separate from Saddam. Instead, his lieutenants understood WMD revival was his goal from their long association with Saddam and his infrequent, but firm, verbal comments and directions to them." The report also noted that "Iran was the pre-eminent motivator of [Iraq's WMD revival] policy. ... The wish to balance Israel and acquire status and influence in the Arab world were also considerations, but secondary." A March 2005 addendum to the report stated that "[B]ased on the evidence available at present, ISG judged that it was unlikely that an official transfer of WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. However, ISG was unable to rule out unofficial movement of limited WMD-related materials."[38][54]
On January 12, 2005, U.S. military forces abandoned the formal search. Transcripts from high level meetings within Saddam Hussein's government before the invasion are consistent with the ISG conclusion that he destroyed his stockpiles of WMD but maintained the expertise to restart production.[55]
Discovery of chemical weapons[edit]
During the post-invasion search for WMD, U.S. and Polish forces located decayed chemical weapons that dated to the Iran–Iraq War. These discoveries led former senator Rick Santorum (R-PA) and representative Peter Hoekstra (R-MI) to say that the U.S. had indeed found weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.[39]
These assertions were directly contradicted by weapons experts David Kay, the original director of the Iraq Survey Group, and his successor Charles Duelfer. Both Kay and Duelfer stated that the chemical weapons found were not the "weapons of mass destruction" that the U.S. was looking for. Kay added that experts on Iraq's chemical weapons are in "almost 100 percent agreement" that sarin nerve agent produced in the 1980s would no longer be dangerous and that the chemical weapons found were "less toxic than most things that Americans have under their kitchen sink at this point". In reply, Hoekstra said "I am 100 percent sure if David Kay had the opportunity to look at the reports.. he would agree.. these things are lethal and deadly."[56] Discussing the findings on NPR's Talk of the Nation, Charles Duelfer described such residual chemical munitions as hazardous but not deadly.
What we found, both as UN and later when I was with the Iraq Survey Group, is that some of these rounds would have highly degraded agent, but it is still dangerous. You know, it can be a local hazard. If an insurgent got it and wanted to create a local hazard, it could be exploded. When I was running the ISG—the Iraq Survey Group—we had a couple of them that had been turned in to these IEDs, the improvised explosive devices. But they are local hazards. They are not a major, you know, weapon of mass destruction.[57]
The degraded chemical weapons were first discovered in May 2004, when a binary sarin nerve gas shell was used in an improvised explosive device (roadside bomb) in Iraq. The device exploded before it could be disarmed, and two soldiers displayed symptoms of minor sarin exposure. The 155 mm shell was unmarked and rigged as if it were a normal high-explosive shell, indicating that the insurgents who placed the device did not know it contained nerve gas. Earlier in the month, a shell containing mustard gas was found abandoned in the median of a road in Baghdad.[58][59]
In July 2004, Polish troops also found evidence of degraded chemical weapons when they discovered insurgents trying to purchase cyclosarin gas warheads produced during the Iran–Iraq war. In their efforts to thwart insurgents acquiring these weapons, Polish troops purchased two rockets on June 23, 2004. The U.S. military later determined that the two rockets had only trace elements of sarin that were so small and deteriorated as to be virtually harmless and would have "limited to no impact if used by insurgents against coalition forces".[60]
Conclusions[edit]
The bad news, therefore, is that the UN proved unequal to the task of preventing a rogue regime from stealing some of its own money. The good news is that this same UN machinery proved equal to the task of preventing that same regime from fielding WMD, developing nuclear weapons and reconstituting a military threat to its neighbors. Most observers would conclude that the UN, however inadequate its financial oversight, certainly got its priorities right. The UN sanctions regime against Iraq, including the Oil for Food program is worth close scrutiny not because it was a scandal, although scandal there was, but because taken as a whole, it is the most successful use of international sanctions on record. Documenting the why and wherefores of that success is as important as correcting the shortfalls that allowed a rogue regime, in connivance with unscrupulous international businessmen, to siphon funds from UN-administered Iraqi accounts.[61]
–Testimony on A Comparative Evaluation of United Nations Peacekeeping by James Dobbins presented before the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs in 2007
The failure to find stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq caused considerable controversy, particularly in the United States. U.S. President George W. Bush and Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Tony Blair defended their decision to go to war, alleging that many nations, even those opposed to war, believed that the Hussein government was actively developing WMDs.
Critics such as Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean charged that the Bush and Blair administrations deliberately falsified evidence to build a case for war.[62] These criticisms were strengthened with the 2005 release of the so-called Downing Street Memo, written in July 2002, in which the former head of British Military Intelligence wrote that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy" of removing Saddam Hussein from power.[63]
While the Downing Street Memo and the yellowcake uranium scandal lent credence to claims that intelligence was manipulated, two bipartisan investigations, one by the Senate Intelligence Committee and the other by a specially appointed Iraq Intelligence Commission chaired by Charles Robb and Laurence Silberman, found no evidence of political pressure applied to intelligence analysts.[64] An independent assessment by the Annenberg Public Policy Center found that Bush Administration officials did misuse intelligence in their public communications. For example, Vice President Dick Cheney's September 2002 statement on Meet the Press that "we do know, with absolute certainty, that he (Saddam) is using his procurement system to acquire the equipment he needs in order to enrich uranium to build a nuclear weapon," was inconsistent with the views of the intelligence community at the time.[64]
A study coauthored by the Center for Public Integrity found that in the two years after September 11, 2001 the president and top administration officials had made 935 false statements, in an orchestrated public relations campaign to galvanize public opinion for the war, and that the press was largely complicit in its uncritical coverage of the reasons adduced for going to war.[65][66] PBS commentator Bill Moyers had made similar points throughout the run up to the Iraq War, and prior to a national press conference on the Iraq War[67] Moyers correctly predicted "at least a dozen times during this press conference he [the President] will invoke 9/11 and Al-Qaeda to justify a preemptive attack on a country that has not attacked America. But the White House press corps will ask no hard questions tonight about those claims."[68][69] Moyers later also denounced the complicity of the press in the administration's campaign for the war, saying that the media "surrendered its independence and skepticism to join with [the U.S.] government in marching to war," and that the administration "needed a compliant press, to pass on their propaganda as news and cheer them on."[69]
Many in the intelligence community expressed sincere regret over the flawed predictions about Iraqi weapons programs. Testifying before Congress in January 2004, David Kay, the original director of the Iraq Survey Group, said unequivocally that "It turns out that we were all wrong, probably in my judgment, and that is most disturbing."[70] He later added in an interview that the intelligence community owed the President an apology.[71]
In the aftermath of the invasion, much attention was also paid to the role of the press in promoting government claims concerning WMD production in Iraq. Between 1998 and 2003, The New York Times and other influential U.S. newspapers published numerous articles about suspected Iraqi rearmament programs with headlines like "Iraqi Work Toward A-Bomb Reported" and "Iraq Suspected of Secret Germ War Effort." It later turned out that many of the sources for these articles were unreliable, and that some were tied to Ahmed Chalabi, an Iraqi exile with close ties to the Bush Administration who was a consistent supporter of an invasion.[72][73][74]
Some controversy also exists regarding whether the invasion increased or decreased the potential for nuclear proliferation. For example, hundreds of tons of dual-use high explosives that could be used to detonate fissile material in a nuclear weapon were sealed by the IAEA at the Al Qa'qaa site in January 2003. Immediately before the invasion, UN Inspectors had checked the locked bunker doors, but not the actual contents; the bunkers also had large ventilation shafts that were not sealed. By October, the material was no longer present. The IAEA expressed concerns that the material might have been looted after the invasion, posing a nuclear proliferation threat. The U.S. released satellite photographs from March 17, showing trucks at the site large enough to remove substantial amounts of material before U.S. forces reached the area in April. Ultimately, Major Austin Pearson of Task Force Bullet, a task force charged with securing and destroying Iraqi ammunition after the invasion, stated that the task force had removed about 250 tons of material from the site and had detonated it or used it to detonate other munitions. Similar concerns were raised about other dual use materials, such as high strength aluminum; before the invasion, the U.S. cited them as evidence for an Iraqi nuclear weapons program, while the IAEA was satisfied that they were being used for permitted industrial uses; after the war, the IAEA emphasized the proliferation concern, while the Duelfer report mentioned the material's use as scrap. Possible chemical weapons laboratories have also been found which were built subsequent to the 2003 invasion, apparently by insurgent forces.[75]
On August 2, 2004, President Bush stated "Knowing what I know today we still would have gone on into Iraq. … The decision I made is the right decision. The world is better off without Saddam Hussein in power."[76]
Iraqi links to terrorist organizations[edit]
Main article: Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda
Along with Iraq's alleged development of WMDs, another justification for invasion was the purported link between Saddam Hussein's government and terrorist organizations, in particular Al-Qaeda.[77] In that sense, the Bush Administration cast the Iraq war as part of the broader War on Terrorism. On February 11, 2003, FBI Director Robert Mueller testified to Congress that "seven countries designated as State Sponsors of Terrorism—Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, and North Korea—remain active in the US and continue to support terrorist groups that have targeted Americans."[33][34]
As with the argument that Iraq was developing biological and nuclear weapons, evidence linking Hussein and Al-Qaeda was discredited by multiple U.S. intelligence agencies soon after the invasion of Iraq.[5]
Al-Qaeda[edit]
In asserting a link between Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda, the Bush Administration focused special attention on alleged ties between Hussein and Jordanian terrorist Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, whom Secretary of State Powell called a "collaborator of Osama bin Laden."[77] Soon after the start of the war, however, evidence of such ties was discredited by multiple U.S. intelligence agencies, including the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Defense Intelligence Agency, and the Defense Department's Inspector General's Office. A CIA report in early October 2004 "found no clear evidence of Iraq harboring Abu Musab al-Zarqawi."[78] More broadly, the CIA's Kerr Group summarized in 2004 that despite "a 'purposely aggressive approach' in conducting exhaustive and repetitive searches for such links... [the U.S.] Intelligence Community remained firm in its assessment that no operational or collaborative relationship existed."[79] Despite these findings, U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney has continued to assert that a link existed between Al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which has drawn criticism from members of the intelligence community and leading Democrats.[80] As of the invasion, the State Department listed 45 countries, including the United States where Al Qaeda was active. Iraq was not one of them.[81]
The eventual lack of evidence linking the Hussein government and Al Qaeda led many war critics to allege that the Bush Administration purposely fabricated such links to strengthen the case for the invasion.[82] These claims were supported by the July 2005 release of the so-called Downing Street Memo, in which Richard Dearlove (then head of British foreign intelligence service MI6) wrote that "the intelligence and facts were being fixed [by the U.S.] around the policy" of removing Saddam Hussein from power.[63] In addition, in his April 2007 report Acting Inspector General Thomas F. Gimble found that the Defense Department's Office of Special Plans—run by then-Undersecretary of Defense Douglas J. Feith, a close ally of Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld—purposely manipulated evidence to strengthen the case for war.[5] The Inspector General's report also highlighted the role of members of the Iraqi National Congress, a group headed by Ahmad Chalabi, in providing false intelligence about connections with Al-Qaeda to build support for a U.S. invasion.[83][84]
Other terrorist organizations[edit]
In making its case for the invasion of Iraq, the Bush Administration also referenced Saddam Hussein's relationships with terrorist organizations other than Al-Qaeda. Hussein provided financial assistance to the families of Palestinians killed in the conflict – including as much as $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers, some of whom were working with militant organizations in the Middle East such as Hamas.[85]
Abdul Rahman Yasin, a suspect detained shortly after the 1993 US World Trade Center Bombing attacks, fled upon release into Iraq. Shortly after release, the FBI had discovered evidence linking him to the creation of the bomb. After the invasion, Iraqi government official documents translated from Arabic to English described Saddam's regime provided monthly payments to Yasin while in residing in the United States. Yasin is on the FBI's most wanted terrorists list, and is still at large.[86][87]
Human rights[edit]
The U.S. has cited the United Nations in condemnation of Hussein's human rights abuses as one of several reasons for the Iraq invasion.
As evidence supporting U.S. and British claims about Iraqi WMDs weakened, the Bush Administration began to focus more upon the other issues that Congress had articulated within the Iraq Resolution such as human rights violations of the Hussein government as justification for military intervention.[88] That the Hussein government consistently and violently violated the human rights of its people is in little doubt.[89] During his more than twenty-year rule, Hussein tortured and killed thousands of Iraqi citizens, including gassing and killing thousands of Kurds in northern Iraq during the mid-1980s, brutally repressing Shia and Kurdish uprisings following the 1991 Gulf War, and a fifteen-year campaign of repression and displacement of the Marsh Arabs in Southern Iraq. In the 2003 State of the Union Address, President Bush mentions Saddam's government practices of obtaining confessions by torturing children while their parents are made to watch, electric shock, burning with hot irons, dripping acid on the skin, mutilation with electric drills, cutting out tongues, and rape.[90][91][92][93]
Many critics have argued, despite its repeated mention in the Joint Resolution, that human rights was never a principal justification for the war, and that it became prominent only after evidence concerning WMDs and Hussein's links to terrorism became discredited. For example, during a July 29, 2003, hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, then Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz spent the majority of his testimony discussing Hussein's human rights record, causing Senator Lincoln Chafee (R-RI) to complain that "in the months leading up to the war it was a steady drum beat of weapons of mass destruction, weapons of mass destruction, weapons of mass destruction. And, Secretary Wolfowitz, in your almost hour-long testimony here this morning, once—only once did you mention weapons of mass destruction, and that was an ad lib."[94]
Leading human rights groups such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International further argued that even had human rights concerns been a central rationale for the invasion, military intervention would not have been justifiable on humanitarian grounds. As Human Rights Watch's Ken Roth wrote in 2004, despite Hussein's horrific human rights record, "the killing in Iraq at the time was not of the exceptional nature that would justify such intervention."[95]
More broadly, war critics have argued that the U.S. and Europe supported the Hussein regime during the 1980s, a period of some of his worst human rights abuses, thus casting doubt on the sincerity of claims that military intervention was for humanitarian purposes. Documents from the National Security Archive released in 2003 show that the U.S. and Europe provided considerable military and financial support during the Iran-Iraq war with full knowledge that the Hussein government was regularly using chemical weapons on Iranian soldiers and Kurdish insurgents. Following along this line, critics of the use of human rights as a rationale, such as Columbia University Law Professor Michael Dorf, have pointed out that during his first campaign for president Bush was highly critical of using U.S. military might for humanitarian ends.[96][97] Others have questioned why military intervention for humanitarian reasons would supposedly have been justified in Iraq but not in other countries where human rights violations were even greater, such as Darfur.[94]
United Nations[edit]
In the end, by Article 1 of the UN Charter, the United Nations has the responsibility: "To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion.[98] By UN Charter Article 39, the responsibility for this determination lies with the Security Council.[98]
Ending sanctions[edit]
Main article: UN sanctions against Iraq
U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, who called the sanctions "the most intrusive system of arms control in history",[99] cited the breakdown of the sanctions as one rationale for the Iraq war.[100] Accepting a controversial large estimate of casualties due to sanctions,[101] Walter Russell Mead argued on behalf of such a war as a better alternative than continuing the sanctions regime, since "Each year of containment is a new Gulf War."[102] However, economist Michael Spagat "argue[s] that the contention that sanctions had caused the deaths of more than half a million children is [as were WMD claims] very likely to be wrong."[103]
Oil[edit]
Oil not a factor in the Iraq war[edit]
In 2002, responding to a question about coveting oil fields, George Bush said "Those are the wrong impressions. I have a deep desire for peace. That's what I have a desire for. And freedom for the Iraqi people. See, I don't like a system where people are repressed through torture and murder in order to keep a dictator in place. That troubles me deeply. And so the Iraqi people must hear this loud and clear, that this country never has any intention to conquer anybody." [104]
Tony Blair stated that the theory that the Iraq invasion had "some[thing] to do with oil" was a "conspiracy theory"; "Let me first deal with the conspiracy theory that this is somehow to do with oil...The very reason why we are taking the action that we are taking is nothing to do with oil or any of the other conspiracy theories put forward."[105]
Then Australian Prime Minister John Howard has dismissed on multiple occasions the role of oil in the Iraq Invasion: "We didn't go there because of oil and we don't remain there because of oil."[106] In early 2003 John Howard stated, "No criticism is more outrageous than the claim that United States behaviour is driven by a wish to take control of Iraq's oil reserves."[107]
2008 Republican Presidential Candidate John McCain was forced to clarify his comments suggesting the Iraq war involved U.S. reliance on foreign oil. "My friends, I will have an energy policy that we will be talking about, which will eliminate our dependence on oil from the Middle East that will prevent us from having ever to send our young men and women into conflict again in the Middle East," McCain said. To clarify his comments, McCain explained that "the word 'again' was misconstrued, I want us to remove our dependency on foreign oil for national security reasons, and that's all I mean."[108]
Scholar Jeff Colgan writes that "Even years after the 2003 Iraq War, there is still no consensus on the degree to which oil played a role in that war."[109]
Oil a factor in the Iraq war[edit]
In 2008, President Bush issued a signing statement, declaring that he would ignore any law that prohibited using federal funds "to establish any military installation or base for the purpose of providing for the permanent stationing of United States Armed Forces in Iraq" or "to exercise United States control of the oil resources of Iraq."[110] According to former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, the United States didn't need to invade Iraq to control the oil. The New York Times reports that in February 2003, Baghdad had offered to give the U.S. first priority as it related to Iraq oil rights, as part of a deal to avert an impending invasion. The overtures intrigued the Bush administration but were ultimately rebuffed.[111] The primary reason for invading Iraq, according to those attending NSC briefings in 2002, was "to create a demonstration model" to deter anyone with the temerity to "flout the authority of the United States" in any way.[112]
Bush's Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said that Bush's first two National Security Council meetings included a discussion of invading Iraq. He was given briefing materials entitled "Plan for post-Saddam Iraq," which envisioned peacekeeping troops, war crimes tribunals, and divvying up Iraq's oil wealth. A Pentagon document dated March 5, 2001, was titled "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield contracts," and included a map of potential areas for exploration.[113]
In July 2003, the Polish foreign minister, Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, said, "We have never hidden our desire for Polish oil companies to finally have access to sources of commodities." This remark came after a group of Polish firms had just signed a deal with Kellogg, Brown and Root, a subsidiary of Halliburton. Cimoszewicz stated that access to Iraq's oilfields "is our ultimate objective".[114]
One report by BBC journalist Gregory Palast citing unnamed "insiders" alleged that the U.S. "called for the sell-off of all of Iraq's oil fields"[115] and planned for a coup d'état in Iraq long before September 11.[115] It was also alleged by the BBC's Greg Palast that the "new plan was crafted by neo-conservatives intent on using Iraq's oil to destroy the OPEC cartel through massive increases in production above OPEC quotas",[115] but in reality Iraq oil production decreased following the Iraq War.[116]
Speaking at the Catholic University of America Columbus School of Law in 2008, Chuck Hagel, the former United States Secretary of Defense, defended Greenspan's comments: "People say we're not fighting for oil. Of course we are."[117] General John Abizaid, CENTCOM commander from 2003 until 2007, said of the Iraq war during a round table discussion at Stanford University in 2008, "Of course it's about oil, it's very much about oil and we can't really deny that."[118][119]
Many critics have focused upon administration officials' past relationship with energy sector corporations. Both the President and Vice President were formerly CEOs of oil and oil-related companies such as Arbusto, Harken Energy, Spectrum 7, and Halliburton. Before the 2003 invasion of Iraq and even before the War on Terror, the administration had prompted anxiety over whether the private sector ties of cabinet members (including National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, former director of Chevron, and Commerce Secretary Donald Evans, former head of Tom Brown Inc.) would affect their judgment on energy policy.[120]
News outlets in mid-2000-2002 carried articles about Saddam's efforts to sell oil on markets exclusively in Euros.[121][122] This may have been viewed as a push to influence other OPEC states to challenge the reserve currency status in oil trading of the USD. This may have been an unacceptable outcome in the global economy with respect to the flow of petrodollars throughout the region.
Prior to the war, the CIA saw Iraqi oil production and illicit oil sales as Iraq's key method of financing increasing WMD capability. The CIA's October 2002 unclassified white paper on "Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs," states on page 1 under the "Key Judgments, Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs" heading that "Iraq's growing ability to sell oil illicitly increases Baghdad's capabilities to finance WMD programs".[123]
Private oil business[edit]
Iraq holds the world's fifth-largest proven oil reserves at 141 billion barrels (2.24×1010 m3),[124] with increasing exploration expected to enlarge them beyond 200 billion barrels (3.2×1010 m3).[125] For comparison, Venezuela—the largest proven source of oil in the world—has 298 billion barrels (4.74×1010 m3) of proven oil reserves.[124]
Organizations such as the Global Policy Forum (GPF) have asserted that Iraq's oil is "the central feature of the political landscape" there, and that as a result of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, "'friendly' companies expect to gain most of the lucrative oil deals that will be worth hundreds of billions of dollars in profits in the coming decades." According to the GPF, U.S. influence over the 2005 Constitution of Iraq has made sure it "contains language that guarantees a major role for foreign companies".[125][126]
Strategic importance of oil[edit]
A proven oil reserves map of the world (CIA- The World Factbook, 2009).
Oil exerts tremendous economic and political influence worldwide, although the line between political and economic influence is not always distinct. The importance of oil to national security is unlike that of any other commodity:
Modern warfare particularly depends on oil, because virtually all weapons systems rely on oil-based fuel – tanks, trucks, armored vehicles, self-propelled artillery pieces, airplanes, and naval ships. For this reason, the governments and general staffs of powerful nations seek to ensure a steady supply of oil during wartime, to fuel oil-hungry military forces in far-flung operational theaters. Such governments view their companies' global interests as synonymous with the national interest and they readily support their companies' efforts to control new production sources, to overwhelm foreign rivals, and to gain the most favorable pipeline routes and other transportation and distribution channels.[127]
Critics of the Iraq War contend that U.S. officials and representatives from the private sector were planning just this kind of mutually supportive relationship as early as 2001, when the James Baker III Institute for Public Policy and the Council on Foreign Relations produced "Strategic Energy Policy: Challenges for the 21st Century," a report describing the long-term threat of energy crises such as blackouts and rising fuel prices then playing havoc with the state of California. The report recommended a comprehensive review of U.S. military, energy, economic, and political policy toward Iraq "with the aim to lowering anti-Americanism in the Middle East and elsewhere, and set the groundwork to eventually ease Iraqi oil-field investment restrictions."[128] The report's urgent tone stood in contrast to the relatively calm speech Chevron CEO Kenneth T. Derr had given the Commonwealth Club of California two years earlier, before the California electricity crisis, where he said:
It might surprise you to learn that even though Iraq possesses huge reserves of oil and gas—reserves I'd love Chevron to have access to—I fully agree with the sanctions we have imposed on Iraq.[129]
Oil and foreign relations[edit]
Post-Iraq invasion opinion polls conducted in Jordan, Morocco, Pakistan, and Turkey showed that the majority in each country tended to "doubt the sincerity of the War on Terrorism," which they characterized instead as "an effort to control Mideast oil and to dominate the world."[130] Although there has been disagreement about where the alleged will to control and dominate originates, skeptics of the War on Terror have pointed early[131] and often[132] to the Project for a New American Century, a neoconservative think tank established in 1997 by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The organization made plain its position on oil, territory, and the use of force in series of publications, including:
a 1998 letter to President Bill Clinton:
It hardly needs to be added that if Saddam does acquire the capability to deliver weapons of mass destruction, as he is almost certain to do if we continue along the present course, the safety of American troops in the region, of our friends and allies like Israel and the moderate Arab states, and a significant portion of the world's supply of oil will all be put at hazard. [...] The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing.[133]
a September 2000 report on foreign policy:
"American forces, along with British and French units...represent the long-term commitment of the United States and its major allies to a region of vital importance. Indeed, the United States has for decades sought to play a more permanent role in Gulf regional security. While the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein."[134]
a May 2001 call to "Liberate Iraq":
Twice since 1980, Saddam has tried to dominate the Middle East by waging wars against neighbors that could have given him control of the region's oil wealth and the identity of the Arab world.[135]
a 2004 apologia:
His clear and unwavering ambition, an ambition nurtured and acted upon across three decades, was to dominate the Middle East, both economically and militarily, by attempting to acquire the lion's share of the region's oil and by intimidating or destroying anyone who stood in his way. This, too, was a sufficient reason to remove him from power.[136]
Of 18 signatories to the 1998 PNAC letter, 11 would later occupy positions in President Bush's administration: Elliott Abrams, Richard Armitage, John R. Bolton, Paula Dobriansky, Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, Richard Perle, Peter W. Rodman, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Robert B. Zoellick.[133] Administration officials Dick Cheney, Eliot A. Cohen, and Lewis Libby were signatories to the 1997 PNAC "Statement of Principles."[137]
Combating terrorism[edit]
In addition to claiming that the Hussein government had ties to Al-Qaeda, the Bush Administration and other supporters of the war have argued for continued involvement in Iraq as a means to combat terrorism. President Bush consistently referred to the Iraq war as the "central front in the war on terror."[138]
In contrast with this rationale, a few intelligence experts claim that the Iraq war has actually increased terrorism, even though no acts of terrorism have occurred within the US. London's conservative International Institute for Strategic Studies concluded in 2004 that the occupation of Iraq had become "a potent global recruitment pretext" for jihadists and that the invasion "galvanized" Al-Qaeda and "perversely inspired insurgent violence" there.[139] Counter-terrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna has called the invasion of Iraq as a "fatal mistake" that has greatly increased terrorism in the Middle East.[140] The U.S. National Intelligence Council concluded in a January 2005 report that the war in Iraq had become a breeding ground for a new generation of terrorists; David B. Low, the national intelligence officer for transnational threats, indicated that the report concluded that the war in Iraq provided terrorists with "a training ground, a recruitment ground, the opportunity for enhancing technical skills.... here is even, under the best scenario, over time, the likelihood that some of the jihadists who are not killed there will, in a sense, go home, wherever home is, and will therefore disperse to various other countries." The Council's Chairman Robert L. Hutchings said, "At the moment, Iraq is a magnet for international terrorist activity."[141] And the 2006 National Intelligence Estimate, which outlined the considered judgment of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, held that "The Iraq conflict has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of US involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement."[142]
Al-Qaeda leaders have also publicly cited the Iraq war as a boon to their recruiting and operational efforts, providing both evidence to jihadists worldwide that America is at war with Islam, and the training ground for a new generation of jihadists to practice attacks on American forces. In October 2003, Osama bin Laden announced: "Be glad of the good news: America is mired in the swamps of the Tigris and Euphrates. Bush is, through Iraq and its oil, easy prey. Here is he now, thank God, in an embarrassing situation and here is America today being ruined before the eyes of the whole world."[143] Echoing this sentiment, Al-Qaeda commander Seif al-Adl gloated about the war in Iraq, indicating, "The Americans took the bait and fell into our trap."[144] A letter thought to be from Al-Qaeda leader Atiyah Abd al-Rahman found in Iraq among the rubble where al-Zarqawi was killed and released by the U.S. military in October 2006, indicated that Al-Qaeda perceived the war as beneficial to its goals: "The most important thing is that the jihad continues with steadfastness ... indeed, prolonging the war is in our interest."[145]
Other rationales[edit]
Bringing democracy to the Middle East[edit]
One of the rationales that the Bush Administration employed periodically during the run-up to the Iraq war is that deposing Saddam Hussein and installing a democratic government in Iraq would promote democracy in other Middle Eastern countries.[146][147] The United States also proclaims that monarchies Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the military ruled Pakistan are allies of America, despite the human rights abuses and subversion of democracy attributed to them respectively. As Vice President Dick Cheney argued in an August 2002 speech to the annual Veterans of Foreign Wars convention, "When the gravest of threats are eliminated, the freedom-loving peoples of the region will have a chance to promote the values that can bring lasting peace."[148] At a 2003 Veterans Day address, President Bush stated:[149]
Our mission in Iraq and Afghanistan is clear to our service members—and clear to our enemies. Our men and women are fighting to secure the freedom of more than 50 million people who recently lived under two of the cruelest dictatorships on earth. Our men and women are fighting to help democracy and peace and justice rise in a troubled and violent region. Our men and women are fighting terrorist enemies thousands of miles away in the heart and center of their power, so that we do not face those enemies in the heart of America.
Establishing long term Middle East military presence[edit]
U.S. General Jay Garner, who was in charge of planning and administering post-war reconstruction in Iraq, compared the U.S. occupation of Iraq to the Philippine model in a 2004 interview in National Journal: "Look back on the Philippines around the turn of the 20th century: they were a coaling station for the navy, and that allowed us to keep a great presence in the Pacific. That's what Iraq is for the next few decades: our coaling station that gives us great presence in the Middle East", "One of the most important things we can do right now is start getting basing rights with (the Iraqi authorities)", "I hope they're there a long time.... And I think we'll have basing rights in the north and basing rights in the south ... we'd want to keep at least a brigade", Garner added.[150]
Also, the House report accompanying the emergency spending legislation said the money was "of a magnitude normally associated with permanent bases".[151]
Divine inspiration[edit]
Nabil Shaath told the BBC that according to minutes of a conference with Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, Bush said, "God inspired me to hit al Qaeda, and so I hit it. And I had the inspiration to hit Saddam, and so I hit him."[152] Haaretz provided a similar translation of the minutes. When an Arabist at the Washington Post translated the same transcript, Bush was said to have indicated that God inspired him to, "end the tyranny in Iraq," instead.[153]
In a 2003 interview, Jacques Chirac, President of France at that time, affirmed that President George W. Bush asked him to send troops to Iraq to stop Gog and Magog, the "Bible's satanic agents of the Apocalypse." According to Chirac, the American leader appealed to their "common faith" (Christianity) and told him: "Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East…. The biblical prophecies are being fulfilled…. This confrontation is willed by God, who wants to use this conflict to erase his people's enemies before a New Age begins."[154][155][156]
Purported Iraqi intelligence plots[edit]
David Harrison claims in the Telegraph to have found secret documents that purport to show Russian President Vladimir Putin offering the use of assassins to Saddam's Iraqi regime to kill Western targets on November 27, 2000.[157]
Alleged terrorist links[edit]
On October 12, 2002, Newsmax wrote that CNSNews correspondent Jeff Johnson reported US Senator Spector wanted a probe of the Oklahoma City bombing link to Iraq after receiving 22 affidavits by Oklahoma residents identifying 8 Middle Eastern men, including a former Iraqi Republican Guard (Hussain Al-Hussaini) from former KFOR-TV reporter Jayna Davis.[158] Jayna Davis had theorised on the purported links between the Oklahoma City bombing, Iraq, and Al-Qaeda.[159]
Abdul Rahman Yasin, a suspect detained shortly after the 1993 US World Trade Center Bombing attacks, fled upon release into Iraq. Shortly after release, the FBI had discovered evidence linking him to the creation of the bomb. After the invasion, Iraqi government official documents translated from Arabic to English described Saddam's regime provided monthly payments to Yasin while in residing in the United States. Yasin is on the FBI's most wanted terrorists list, and is still at large.[86][87]
John Lumpkin, Associated Press Writer, consolidates statements made by Vice President Cheney concerning the 1993 WTC bombing and Iraq. Cheney indicated Saddam's Iraqi government claimed to have FBI Fugitive Yasin, alleged participant in the mixing of the chemicals making the bomb used in the 1993 WTC attack, in an Iraqi prison. During negotiations in the weeks prior to the invasion of Iraq, Saddam refused to extradite him.[159]
Fox News claimed that evidence found in Iraq after the invasion was used to stop the attempted assassination of the Pakistani ambassador in New York with a shoulder fired rocket.[160]
U.S. government officials have claimed that after the invasion, Yemen and Jordan stopped Iraqi terrorist attacks against Western targets in those nations. U.S. intelligence also warned 10 other countries that small groups of Iraqi intelligence agents may be readying similar attacks.[161]
After the Beslan school hostage crisis, public school layouts and crisis plans were retrieved on a disk recovered during an Iraqi raid and had raised concerns in the United States. The information on the disks was "all publicly available on the Internet" and U.S. officials "said it was unclear who downloaded the information and stressed there is no evidence of any specific threats involving the schools."[162]
Pressuring Saudi Arabia[edit]
The operations in Iraq came about as a result of the US attempting to put pressure on Saudi Arabia. Much of the funding for Al-Qaeda came from sources in Saudi Arabia through channels left over from the Afghan War. The US, wanting to staunch such financial support, pressured the Saudi leadership to cooperate with the West. The Saudis in power, fearing an Islamic backlash if they cooperated with the US which could push them from power, refused. In order to put pressure on Saudi Arabia to cooperate, the invasion of Iraq was conceived. Such an action would demonstrate the power of the US military, put US troops near to Saudi Arabia, and demonstrate that the US did not need Saudi allies to project itself in the Middle East.[163]
Criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq war[edit]
See also: Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, Opposition to the Iraq War, Protests against the Iraq war, Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq, and Views on the 2003 invasion of Iraq
Despite these efforts to sway public opinion, the invasion of Iraq was seen by some including Kofi Annan,[164] United Nations Secretary-General, Lord Goldsmith, British Attorney General,[165] and Human Rights Watch[166] as a violation of international law,[167] breaking the UN Charter (see Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq) especially since the U.S. failed to secure U.N. support for an invasion of Iraq. In 41 countries the majority of the populace did not support an invasion of Iraq without U.N. sanction and half said an invasion should not occur under any circumstances.[168] In the U.S., 73 percent of United States supported an invasion.[168] To build international support the United States formed a "Coalition of the Willing" with the United Kingdom, Italy, Poland, Australia and several other countries despite a majority of citizens in these countries opposing the invasion.[168] Massive protests of the war have occurred in the U.S. and elsewhere.[169][170][171] At the time of the invasion UNMOVIC inspectors were ordered out by the United Nations. The inspectors requested more time because "disarmament, and at any rate verification, cannot be instant."[172][173]
Following the invasion, no stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction were found, although about 500 abandoned chemical munitions, mostly degraded, remaining from Iraq's Iran–Iraq war, were collected from around the country.[174][175][176] The Kelly Affair highlighted a possible attempt by the British government to cover-up fabrications in British intelligence, the exposure of which would have undermined the Prime Minister's original rationale for involvement in the war. The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence found no substantial evidence for reputed links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda.[177] President George W. Bush has since admitted that "much of the intelligence turned out to be wrong".[178][179][180] Although evidence of WMD was searched for by the Iraq Survey Group, their final report of September 2004 stated, "While a small number of old, abandoned chemical munitions have been discovered, ISG judges that Iraq unilaterally destroyed its undeclared chemical weapons stockpile in 1991. There are no credible indications that Baghdad resumed production of chemical munitions thereafter, a policy ISG attributes to Baghdad's desire to see sanctions lifted, or rendered ineffectual, or its fear of force against it should WMD be discovered."[181] In the March 2005 Addendum to the Report, the Special Advisor furthermore went on to state that "ISG assesses that Iraq and Coalition Forces will continue to discover small numbers of degraded chemical weapons, which the former Regime mislaid or improperly destroyed prior to 1991. ISG believes the bulk of these weapons were likely abandoned, forgotten and lost during the Iran-Iraq war because tens of thousands of CW munitions were forward deployed along frequently and rapidly shifting battlefronts."[182] (For comparison, the U.S. Department of Defense itself was famously unable in 1998 to report the whereabouts of "56 airplanes, 32 tanks and 36 Javelin command launch units".)[183] ISG also believed that Saddam did not want to verifiably disarm Iraq of WMD, as required by U.N. resolutions, for fear of looking weak to his enemies.[184]
Clare Short claims that in July 2002, UK government ministers were warned that Britain was committed to participating in a U.S. invasion of Iraq, and a further allegation was that "the decision by Blair's government to participate in the U.S. invasion of Iraq bypassed proper government procedures and ignored opposition to the war from Britain's intelligence quarters.".[185] Tony Blair had agreed to back military action to oust Saddam Hussein with an assessment regarding WMD, at a summit at President George W. Bush's Texas ranch. Also present at the meeting were three other British officials – Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) head Sir Richard Dearlove.
Jacques Chirac, Gerhard Schroeder and Vladimir Putin made public statements in opposition to the invasion of Iraq.
In Europe the peace movement was very strong,[186][187] especially in Germany, where three quarters of the population were opposed to the war.[188] Ten NATO member countries did not join the coalition with the U.S., and their leaders made public statements in opposition to the invasion of Iraq. These leaders included Gerhard Schroeder of Germany,[189] Jacques Chirac of France,[190] Guy Verhofstadt of Belgium,[191] and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey.[192] Public perceptions of the U.S. changed dramatically as a consequence of the invasion.[193][194] China and Russia also expressed their opposition to the invasion of Iraq.[195]
Other possible U.S. objectives, denied by the U.S. government but acknowledged by retired U.S. General Jay Garner, included the establishment of permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq as a way of projecting power (creating a credible threat of U.S. military intervention) to the oil-rich Persian Gulf region and the Middle East generally.[196] In February 2004, Jay Garner, who was in charge of planning and administering post-war reconstruction in Iraq, explained that the U.S. occupation of Iraq was comparable to the Philippine model: "Look back on the Philippines around the turn of the 20th century: they were a coaling station for the navy, and that allowed us to keep a great presence in the Pacific. That's what Iraq is for the next few decades: our coaling station that gives us great presence in the Middle East";[197] (see also Philippine–American War). Garner was replaced by Paul Bremer after reports came out of his position in SY Coleman, a division of defense contractor L-3 Communications specializing in missile-defense systems. It was believed his role in the company was in contention with his role in Iraq.[198] The House Appropriations Committee said the report accompanying the emergency spending legislation was "of a magnitude normally associated with permanent bases."[199] However, the United States House of Representatives voted in 2006 to not fund any permanent bases in Iraq.[200]
See also[edit]
2003 invasion of Iraq
Curveball (informant)
Downing Street memo
Habbush letter
Iraq document leak 18 September 2004
Iraq resolution
Iraqi biological weapons program
Legality of the Iraq war
Legitimacy of the 2003 invasion of Iraq
Office of Special Plans and Energy Task Force
Plame affair and Yellowcake forgery
Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq
The UN Security Council and the Iraq war
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Winning the War on Terror" (PDF). U.S. State Department Bureau of Public Affairs.
^ Jump up to: a b c Bellinger, John. "Transatlantic Approaches to the International Legal Regime in an Age of Globalization and Terrorism". U.S. State Department.
Jump up ^ UN Security Council Resolution 1441 Retrieved 30 January 2008 Archived January 9, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ United Nations Security Council PV 4701. page 2. Colin Powell United States 5 February 2003. Retrieved 2007-07-17.
^ Jump up to: a b c Smith, R. Jeffrey (April 6, 2007). "Hussein's Prewar Ties To Al-Qaeda Discounted". The Washington Post.
Jump up ^ Sandalow, Marc (September 29, 2004). "Record shows Bush shifting on Iraq war / President's rationale for the invasion continues to evolve". The San Francisco Chronicle.
Jump up ^ Curtin, J. Sean. "Japanese Anti-War Sentiment on Iraq in Accord with Global Opinion". GLOCOM Platform. Japanese Institute of Global Communications.
Jump up ^ World Opposed to Bush and Iraq War, BBC Poll Says
Jump up ^ "Iraq war illegal, says Annan". BBC News. September 16, 2004. Retrieved November 15, 2008.
Jump up ^ Shakir, Faiz. "Bush Insists 'I Didn't Want War,' Overwhelming Evidence Suggests Otherwise". ThinkProgress.
Jump up ^ Redirection of Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Experts Short-term Program Retrieved 30 January 2008 Archived January 9, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Baker, Peter; Cooper, Helene; Gordon, Michael (June 11, 2015). "Obama Looks at Adding Bases and Troops in Iraq, to Fight ISIS". The New York Times.
Jump up ^ Scott Ritter and Seymour Hersh: Iraq Confidential Retrieved 30 January 2008
Jump up ^ H.R.4655 Archived 2009-06-30 at the Stanford Web Archive Retrieved 30 January 2008
Jump up ^ "Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Enrolled as Agreed to or Passed by Both House and Senate)". Library of Congress. Retrieved 2006-05-25.
Jump up ^ "RESOLUTION 687 (1991)". April 8, 1991. Archived from the original on May 23, 2006. Retrieved 2006-05-25.
Jump up ^ Arkin, William. "The Difference Was in the Details". The Washington Post, January 17, 1999; Page B1. Retrieved from "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-09-09. Retrieved 2007-04-23. on April 23, 2007.
Jump up ^ Rebuilding Americas Defenses Archived 2007-08-08 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 30 January 2008
^ Jump up to: a b "O'Neill: 'Frenzy' distorted war plans account". CNN.com. January 14, 2004. Retrieved 2006-05-26.
Jump up ^ "Plans For Iraq Attack Began On 9/11". CBS News. September 4, 2002. Retrieved 2006-05-26.
^ Jump up to: a b http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/02/16/building-momentum-for-regime-change-rumsfelds-secret-memos/
Jump up ^ "Chronology: The Evolution of the Bush Doctrine". PBS.org. Retrieved on May 15, 2007.
Jump up ^ "The President's State of the Union Address" Archived 2009-05-02 at the Wayback Machine.. Office of the Press Secretary, January 29, 2002.
Jump up ^ "U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell Addresses the U.N. Security Council". February 5, 2003.
Jump up ^ "Colin Powell's Speech". C-SPAN.org. Retrieved 2018-05-07.
Jump up ^ Wolf Blitzer (July 8, 2003). "Did the Bush Administration exaggerate the threat from Iraq?". CNN.
Jump up ^ Bob Kemper (October 23, 2002). "Saddam can keep rule if he complies: Bush". Daily Times:. Archived from the original on August 25, 2004.
Jump up ^ "Tony Blair: Answer to Parliamentary Question". Hansard.
Jump up ^ "PM gives interview to Radio Monte Carlo". Archived from the original on 2002-06-22.
Jump up ^ "Bush, Blair: Time running out for Saddam". CNN. January 31, 2003. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
Jump up ^ "Tony Blair: Parliamentary Statement". Hansard. Archived from the original on 2004-02-13.
Jump up ^ "Transcript of Powell's U.N. presentation". [1], February 6, 2003. Retrieved on April 6, 2007.
^ Jump up to: a b "Before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence of the United States Senate". Fbi.gov. February 11, 2003.
^ Jump up to: a b "Mueller: 'Enemy is far from defeated'". CNN. February 11, 2003.
Jump up ^ "Press Briefing with Ari Fleischer". White House. April 10, 2003. Archived from the original on July 15, 2012. Retrieved 2008-02-10.
Jump up ^ "Wolfowitz reveals Iraq PR plan". Retrieved 2006-09-05.
Jump up ^ "Official: U.S. calls off search for Iraqi WMDs". CNN.com, January 12, 2005. Retrieved on May 17, 2007.
^ Jump up to: a b "Comprehensive Revised Report with Addendums on Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction (Duelfer Report)". U.S. Government Printing Office. Archived from the original on 2006-01-07. Retrieved 2006-09-09.
^ Jump up to: a b Negroponte, John D. (2006-06-21). "Iraqi Chemical Munitions" (PDF). U.S. Director of National Intelligence. Archived from the original (pdf) on 2006-06-28.
Jump up ^ "The Inspections Maze". Christian Science Monitor. 2002. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved 2006-04-28.
Jump up ^ "Biological Warfare Annex B". Archived from the original on 2006-08-31. Retrieved 2006-09-05.
Jump up ^ Resignation Letter Retrieved 30 January 2008
Jump up ^ "Testimony of Scott Ritter, former UNSCOM Inspector". Archived from the original on December 24, 2002. Retrieved 2002-12-24. CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
Jump up ^ "Statements of the Director General". IAEA. Retrieved 2006-09-07.
Jump up ^ Blix, Hans (2003-05-13), Thirteenth quarterly report of the Executive Chairman of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission in accordance with paragraph 12 of Security council resolution 1284 (1999), UNMOVIC
Jump up ^ "Selected Security Council Briefings". UNMOVIC. Retrieved 2002-09-07.
Jump up ^ Hans Blix's briefing to the security council Retrieved 30 January 2008
Jump up ^ "Statement by David Kay on the Interim Progress Report on the Activities of the Iraq Survey Group". Central Intelligence Agency. Archived from the original on March 10, 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-08. CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
Jump up ^ "Iraqi scientists gives up 12-year-old nuclear parts". 2003-06-27.
Jump up ^ "Transcript: David Kay at Senate Hearing". CNN. 2004-01-28.
Jump up ^ Dr. David Kay Testimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee (January 28, 2014).
Jump up ^ Haldenby, Andrew (2004-01-25). "Saddam's WMD hidden in Syria, says Iraq survey chief". London: Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
Jump up ^ "Comprehensive report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD". Archived from the original on 2006-10-28. Retrieved 2006-09-09.
Jump up ^ "Addendums to the Comprehensive Report of the Special Advisor to the DCI on Iraq's WMD" (PDF). U.S. Government Printing Office. March 2005.
Jump up ^ "Documents Show Saddam's WMD Frustrations". ABC News International. 2006-03-21.
Jump up ^ Shrader, Katherine (22 June 2006). "New Intel Report Reignites Iraq Arms Fight". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2007-05-22.
Jump up ^ Interview with Charles Duelfer, "Iraq WMD Find Did Not Point to Ongoing Program", NPR Talk of the Nation. June 22, 2006.
Jump up ^ Porteus, Liza (2004-05-19). "Tests Confirm Sarin in Iraqi Artillery Shell". Fox News.
Jump up ^ "Iraq Sarin Find Worries U.S." CBS News. 2004-05-14.
Jump up ^ "Troops 'foil Iraq nerve gas bid". BBC News, July 2, 2004. Retrieved on May 22, 2007.
Jump up ^ Dobbins, James. "A Comparative Evaluation of United Nations Peacekeeping". RAND Corp. Retrieved 12 February 2015.
Jump up ^ Baker, Russ. "The Big Lie". The Nation.
^ Jump up to: a b "Why has "Downing Street memo" story been a "dud" in US?". Christian Science Monitor. Archived from the original on March 10, 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-17.
^ Jump up to: a b "Iraq: What Did Congress Know, And When?". FactCheck.org. Annenberg Public Policy Center. Archived from the original on March 3, 2009. CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
Jump up ^ Center for Public Integrity, January 23, 2008 Iraq: The War Card Archived 2008-01-27 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Associated Press, January 23, 2008 Study: Bush Led U.S. To War on 'False Pretenses'[permanent dead link]
Jump up ^ "President George Bush Discusses Iraq in National Press Conference". White House.
Jump up ^ Bill Moyers. "Bill Moyers: On the record". PBS (The Moyers Blog).
^ Jump up to: a b Bill Moyers (April 25, 2007). "Buying the war". Public Broadcasting System.
Jump up ^ Transcript: David Kay at Senate hearing – January 28, 2004
Jump up ^ Comments on intelligence failure:
Kay: No evidence Iraq stockpiled WMDs
"Bush takes responsibility for invasion intelligence". CNN. 2005-12-14.
"Transcript of Bush speech". CNN. 2005-12-14.
"No evidence Iraq stockpiled WMDs". CNN. 2004-01-26. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
"White House knew there were no WMD: CIA". Sydney Morning Herald. 2006-04-22.
Jump up ^ Kagan, Robert (2005-10-25). "It Wasn't Just Miller's Story". The Washington Post.
Jump up ^ "The New York Times' role in promoting war on Iraq". The Sydney Morning Herald. 2004-03-23.
Jump up ^ "The Source of the Trouble". New York Magazine. Archived from the original on 2006-06-27. Retrieved 2006-09-08.
Jump up ^ "Missing Iraqi nuke equipment worries IAEA". CNN. 2004-10-12. Archived from the original on May 13, 2006.
"U.S. Team Took 250 Tons of Iraqi Munitions". Fox News. 2004-10-30.
Iraqi Chemical Stash Uncovered
Jump up ^ "President's Remarks on Intelligence Reform". Retrieved 2006-09-11.
^ Jump up to: a b Powell, Colin (February 5, 2003). "U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell Addresses the U.N. Security Council". Whitehouse.gov. Retrieved 2006-05-25.
Jump up ^ Borger, Julian (October 7, 2004). "There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq". The Guardian.
Jump up ^ "Kerr Report" (PDF). Irrationally Informed.
Jump up ^ "Cheney asserts Iraq-al Qaeda link". BBC News. April 6, 2007.
Jump up ^ "Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda". Archived from the original on April 3, 2003. Retrieved 2007-08-08. CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown (link)
Jump up ^ "The alleged linkage of Saddam Hussein with Osama bin Laden, al Qaeda and weapons of mass destruction". SourceWatch. Center for Media and Democracy.
Jump up ^ Landay, Jonathan; Wells, Tish. "Global Misinformation Campaign was Used to Build Case for War". Common Dreams. Archived from the original on March 22, 2006. CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
Jump up ^ McCollam, Douglas. "How Chalabi Played the Press". Columbia Journalism Review. Archived from the original on July 15, 2004. CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
Jump up ^ Palestinians get Saddam funds, BBC News. March 13, 2003.
^ Jump up to: a b Most Wanted Terrorists Archived 2008-06-11 at the Wayback Machine.
^ Jump up to: a b Iraq sheltered suspect in '93 WTC attack
Jump up ^ Senators Slam Shifting Iraq War Justification. Islamonline. July 30, 2003.
Jump up ^ "Decades of human rights abuses in Iraq" Archived 2007-05-09 at the Wayback Machine.. Amnesty International, retrieved on May 16, 2007.
Jump up ^ Rumsfeld 'offered help to Saddam'
Jump up ^ Conflict in Iraq
Jump up ^ The 1991 Uprising in Iraq And Its Aftermath
Jump up ^ Iraq: Devastation of Marsh Arabs
^ Jump up to: a b "Testimony as Delivered by Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Director, Office of Management and Budget, Joshua Bolten, and Acting Chief of Staff, U.S. Army, Gene, Tuesday, July 29, 2003". Defenselink. U.S. Department of Defense. Archived from the original on October 23, 2006. CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
Jump up ^ Roth, Ken. "War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention" Human Rights Watch. January 2004. Retrieved April 6, 2007.
Jump up ^ Dorf, Michael C. "Kerry Stands by His Iraq War Vote". FindLaw.com, August 18, 2004. Retrieved on May 17, 2007.
Jump up ^ Yoram Dinstein (December 12, 2011). War, Aggression and Self-Defence. Cambridge University Press. p. 113.
^ Jump up to: a b Charter of the United Nations Archived 2009-02-20 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ "EYES ON IRAQ; In Cheney's Words: The Administration Case for Removing Saddam Hussein". New York Times. 2002-08-27. Retrieved 2009-05-30.
Jump up ^ "Vice President and Mrs. Cheney's Remarks in Wilmington, Ohio". Georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. Retrieved 2009-05-30.
Jump up ^ Murray, Iain (2003-03-21). "Recent Research Suggests ..." United Press International. Archived from the original on 2005-03-19. Retrieved 2009-07-06.
Jump up ^ "Deadlier Than War - Council on Foreign Relations". Cfr.org. Retrieved 2009-06-29.
Jump up ^ Spagat, Michael (September 2010). "Truth and death in Iraq under sanctions" (PDF). Significance.
Jump up ^ THE 2002 ELECTION; Excerpts From News Conference: Imagine 'Hussein With Nuclear Weapons', The New York Times November 8, 2002
Jump up ^ http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/2003/jan/15/engagements |chapter-url= missing title (help). Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). House of Commons. 15 January 2003.
Jump up ^ "Australia 'has Iraq oil interest'". BBC. July 5, 2007. Retrieved 2008-04-03.
Jump up ^ Bradford, Gillian (July 5, 2007). "Australia must protect oil supply: Howard". The World Today.
Jump up ^ "McCain Clarifies Comments Suggesting Iraq War Was Fought Over Foreign Oil". Fox News. Associated Press. May 2, 2008. Archived from the original on April 23, 2009. CS1 maint: Unfit url (link)
Jump up ^ Colgan, Jeff (Fall 2013). "Fueling the Fire: Pathways from Oil to War". International Security. 38 (2): 148. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00135.
Jump up ^ "Bush asserts authority to bypass defense act" Boston Globe, January 30, 2008
Jump up ^ "THE STRUGGLE FOR IRAQ: DIPLOMACY; Iraq Said to Have Tried to Reach Last-Minute Deal to Avert War" New York Times, November 6, 2003
Jump up ^ "The One Percent Doctrine: Deep Inside America's Pursuit of Its Enemies Since 9/11" Ron Suskind, 2008
Jump up ^ Rebecca, Leung (February 11, 2009). "Bush Sought 'Way' To Invade Iraq?". 60 Minutes. Retrieved 22 March 2013.
Jump up ^ "Poland seeks Iraqi oil stake" BBC News
^ Jump up to: a b c Secret US plans for Iraq's oil
Jump up ^ Apocalypse and/or Business as Usual? The Energy Debate After the 2004 US Presidential Elections Archived 2007-11-05 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hagel-skewers-iraq-war-defends-greenspans-oil-comments
Jump up ^ Progress, Think (October 15, 2007). "Abizaid: "Of Course It's About Oil, We Can't Really Deny That"". Huffington Post.
Jump up ^ Video on YouTube
Jump up ^ "BBC News Analysis: Oil and the Bush cabinet" Monday, 29 January 2001
Jump up ^ Foreign Exchange: Saddam Turns His Back on Greenbacks
Jump up ^ Radio Free Europe - Iraq: Baghdad Moves To Euro
Jump up ^ "Iraq's Weapons of Mass Destruction Programs" CIA white paper, October 2002
^ Jump up to: a b http://www.eia.gov/countries/country-data.cfm?fips=iz
^ Jump up to: a b Global Policy Forum: Oil in Iraq retrieved 26 July 2007
Jump up ^ "Crude Designs". Greg Muttitt, Global Policy Forum, November 2005
Jump up ^ Oil Companies in Iraq:A Century of Rivalry and War. James A. Paul, Global Policy Forum, November 2003
Jump up ^ Strategic Energy Policy: Challenges for the 21st Century.
Jump up ^ "Engagement: A Better Alternative." Speech by Kenneth T. Derr to the Commonwealth Club of California, San Francisco, California, November 5, 1998 Archived September 24, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Pew Center Poll: "A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists"
Jump up ^ "Bush Advisers Planned Iraq War Since 1990s." Joe Taglieri, From the Wilderness, 2002
Jump up ^ "Supporter's Voice Now Turns on Bush." Michiko Kakutani reviews Francis Fukuyama, New York Times, March 14, 2006
^ Jump up to: a b "Letter to President Clinton on Iraq." PNAC, January 26, 1998 Archived September 9, 2008, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ "Rebuilding America's Defenses." PNAC, September 2000 Archived 2007-08-08 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Liberate Iraq Archived 2013-10-11 at the Wayback Machine. Reuel Marc Gerecht, The Weekly Standard, May 14, 2001
Jump up ^ Robert Kagan & William Kristol (February 27, 2004). "The Right War for the Right Reasons". Weekly Standard. Archived from the original on 11 March 2013. Retrieved 30 July 2015.
Jump up ^ PNAC "Statement of Principles." June 3, 1997 Archived February 5, 2005, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ President Addresses Nation, Discusses Iraq, War on Terror
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-09-20. Retrieved 2006-10-06.
Jump up ^ Rohan Gunaratna, "The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda," Washington Quarterly 27:3 (Summer 2004) p. 98.
Jump up ^ Priest, Dana (January 14, 2005). "Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground". The Washington Post. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-30. Retrieved 2006-10-01.
Jump up ^ "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2006-10-08. Retrieved 2006-11-06.
Jump up ^ http://towardfreedom.com/home/content/view/623/60/
Jump up ^ How Al Qaeda views a long Iraq war
Jump up ^ Wright, Steven. The United States and Persian Gulf Security: The Foundations of the War on Terror, Ithaca Press, 2007 ISBN 978-0-86372-321-6
Jump up ^ Mark Sandalow (2004-09-29). "Record Shows Bush Shifting on Iraq War". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on 2008-05-19.
Jump up ^ Vice President Speaks at VFW 103rd National Convention
Jump up ^ "President Bush Discusses Iraq in Veterans Day Address". The White House. 2003-11-11. Retrieved 2008-01-18.
Jump up ^ "Garner: Federalism Can Avert Civil War In Iraq (03/10/2004)". Retrieved 2007-06-18. [dead link] quoted in "AlterNet: Bush Lies Uncovered". Retrieved 2007-06-18. ; See also Philippine–American War
Jump up ^ BBC News, March 30, 2006, Iraq bases spur questions over US plans
Jump up ^ MacAskill, Ewen (7 October 2005). "George Bush: 'God told me to end the tyranny in Iraq'". London: The Guardian. Retrieved 11 November 2010.
Jump up ^ Washington Post: Interpretation of Bush's Comments Reignites Debate October 9, 2005
Jump up ^ A French Revelation, or The Burning Bush at the Council for Secular Humanism: official website. Accessed August 8, 2009.
Jump up ^ Maurice, Jean-Claude (2003). Si vous le répétez, je démentirai... - Chirac, Sarkozy, Villepin. Paris: Plon. ISBN 978-2-259-21021-8. [page needed]
Jump up ^ Agog over Bush's comments on Gog and Magog, Charleston Gazette, July 22, 2009
Jump up ^ Revealed: Russia spied on Blair for Saddam
Jump up ^ "Sen. Specter Wants Probe of Possible Link Between Iraq, Oklahoma Bombing". Newsmax.
^ Jump up to: a b Briley, Patrick B. (September 5, 2002). "America Should Act in Self Defense Against Iraq For 9/11, OKC, 1993 WTC Attacks". OKCBombing.org. Archived from the original on May 25, 2006. Retrieved 2006-07-14.
Jump up ^ "Iraqi Oil-for-Food Official Killed". Fox News. July 3, 2004. |first1= missing |last1= in Authors list (help)
Jump up ^ Pincus, Walter (June 19, 2004). "Russia Warned U.S. About Iraq, Putin Says". Washington Post. pp. A11. Retrieved 2006-07-14.
Jump up ^ Feller, Ben (October 8, 2004). "Computer disc found in Iraq contained U.S. school plans". USA Today.
Jump up ^ Friedman, George America's Secret War: Inside the Hidden Worldwide Struggle Between the United States and Its Enemies Doubleday, 2004 ISBN 0-385-51245-7 pg. ?
Jump up ^ "Iraq war illegal, says Annan". BBC. 2004-09-16.
Jump up ^ British Attorney General's Advice to Blair on Legality of Iraq War
Jump up ^ International Humanitarian Law Issues In A Potential War In Iraq
Jump up ^ Preventive War
^ Jump up to: a b c "Gallup International Iraq Poll 2003" (PDF). Gallup International. 2003. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-09-27. Retrieved 11 July 2016.
Jump up ^ "Cities jammed in worldwide protest of war in Iraq". CNN. 2003-02-16.
Jump up ^ "'Million' march against Iraq war". BBC. 2003-02-16.
Jump up ^ Largest Anti-War Rally Archived 2004-09-04 at the Wayback Machine.. Guinness Book of World Records.
Jump up ^ Left, Sarah (2003-03-07). "Blix wants months – and Straw offers 10 days". The Guardian. London. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
Jump up ^ "Transcript of Blix's U.N. presentation". CNN. 2003-03-07. Retrieved 2008-01-09. How much time would it take to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks? While cooperation can—cooperation can and is to be immediate, disarmament, and at any rate verification of it, cannot be instant. Even with a proactive Iraqi attitude induced by continued outside pressure, it will still take some time to verify sites and items, analyze documents, interview relevant persons and draw conclusions. It will not take years, nor weeks, but months.
Jump up ^ https://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A12115-2004Oct6
Jump up ^ "Sarin, Mustard Gas Discovered Separately in Iraq". Fox News. 2004-05-17.
Jump up ^ "Hundreds of chemical weapons found in Iraq". Breitbart. 2006-06-22. Archived from the original on 2007-01-22.
Jump up ^ United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Archived 2006-09-21 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved September 10, 2006.
Jump up ^ "Bush takes responsibility for invasion intelligence". CNN. 2005-12-14.
Jump up ^ "Transcript of Bush speech". CNN. 2005-12-14.
Jump up ^ "Bush admits Iraq intelligence was wrong". The Guardian. London. 2005-12-14. Retrieved May 22, 2010.
Jump up ^ "Iraq Survey Group Final Report". GlobalSecurity.Org.
Jump up ^ "Addendums to the Comprehensive Report" (PDF). GlobalSecurity.Org.
Jump up ^ "Government's financial systems fall flat". Government Computer News. 2000-06-24. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27.
Jump up ^ http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol1_rsi-05.htm
Jump up ^ "Claire Short". Archived from the original on October 2, 2006.
Jump up ^ "Millions march against war". Boston.Com. 2003-02-16. Archived from the original on June 14, 2006.
Jump up ^ "No reason to rest". Al-Ahram Weekly. 2004-04-08 to 2004-04-14. Archived from the original on 2006-11-07. Check date values in: |date= (help)
Jump up ^ Adler, Katya (2003-02-03). "Analysis: Germany finds a voice". BBC.
Jump up ^ Schreder
Jump up ^ Chrac says non
Jump up ^ Verhodstadt
Jump up ^ Turkey
Jump up ^ "America's Image Further Erodes, Europeans Want Weaker Ties". The Pew Research Center. 2003-03-18.
Jump up ^ "A Year After Iraq War: Mistrust of America in Europe Ever Higher, Muslim Anger Persists". The Pew Research Center. 2004-03-16.
Jump up ^ "Opposition to Iraq war widens". BBC News. 23 January 2003.
Jump up ^ Garner
Jump up ^ "Bush Lies Uncovered". AlterNet. 2004-02-23.
Jump up ^ Lazarus, David (2003-02-26). "General reverses his role". The San Francisco Chronicle.
Jump up ^ Branford, Becky (2006-03-30). "Iraq bases spur questions over US plans". BBC.
Jump up ^ "The Will of the People's House Is Clear: No Permanent Bases in Iraq". U.S. House of Representatives: Tom Allen Homepage. Archived from the original on 2006-11-14.
External links[edit]
Tony Blair tells George W Bush they can create 'post-cold war world order' in 2003 note
'The U.S. and Europe, 1945 to Today' by Immanuel Wallerstein
U.S. Gaining World's Respect From Wars, Rumsfeld Asserts by Ann Scott Tyson
'The Bush Turn and The Drive for Primacy' by Peter Gowan
'The War Lobby: Iraq and the Pursuit of U.S. Primacy' by Edward Duggan
Scarier Than a Neoconserative by Jeet Heer
show
v
t
e
Iraq War (2003–2011)
Background
Lead-up
Disarmament crisis
Yellowcake uranium
WMD claims
Rationale
US popular opinion
Hussein interview
Biological weapons
Invasion
Failed Iraqi peace initiatives
Preparations
Multi-National Force
Timeline
Battle of Nasiriyah
Invasion of Baghdad
Debecka Pass
Firdos Square statue
Mission Accomplished speech
Post-war WMD conjecture
Coalition Provisional Authority
Key events
Invasion (2003)
Execution of Saddam Hussein (2006)
Anbar Province (2003–11)
Insurgency (2003–11)
Post-invasion insurgency (2003–06)
Sectarian violence (2006–08)
U.S. withdrawal (2007–11)
Aftermath
Post-withdrawal insurgency (2011–13)
Military intervention against ISIL (2014–present)
American-led intervention in Iraq
Iraqi Civil War (2014–present)
Reactions
Views on the invasion
Legitimacy of the invasion
Opposition
Protests
Criticism
United Nations
Governmental positions
Controversies
Journalist deaths by U.S. fire (2003)
Baghdad Museum looting (2003)
Fallujah killings (2003)
Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse (2004)
Mukaradeeb wedding party massacre (2004)
Haditha massacre (2005)
Mahmudiyah rape and killings (2006)
Ishaqi incident (2006)
Hamdania incident (2006)
Baghdad airstrike (2007)
Nisour Square massacre (2007)
Iraq War documents leak (2010)
Impact
Refugees
Duelfer Report
Damage to Baghdad
Archaeological looting
Iraq Interim Governing Council
Aid and Investment
Economic reform
Financial cost
Casualties
Chilcot Inquiry
Human rights
Memorials
London
Lists
Coalition military operations
Bombings
Aviation shootdowns and accidents
Associated people
Timeline
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Category
Wikinews
Multimedia
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War&oldid=856451410"
Categories:
Causes and prelude of the Iraq War
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
Webarchive template other archives
CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown
CS1 maint: Unfit url
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from February 2018
Articles with permanently dead external links
Pages with citations having bare URLs
Cite Hansard tracking category
Articles with dead external links from March 2017
Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2010
CS1 errors: missing author or editor
CS1 errors: dates
Pages using military navigation subgroups without wide style
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2016
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
Deutsch
Español
日本語
Suomi
Edit links
This page was last edited on 25 August 2018, at 09:04 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

attrs: class href

values: mw-jump-link #mw-head

values: mw-jump-link #p-search

value: span

attrs: class role tabindex

value: abbr

attrs: title style

value: li

value: ul

values: Battle of the Green Line (2003) (page does not exist)

values: Battle of the Kani Domlan Ridge (page does not exist)

values:
/wiki/Ramadan_Offensive
mw-redirect
Ramadan Offensive

values:
/wiki/Lake_Tharthar_Raid
mw-redirect
Lake Tharthar Raid

values:
/wiki/2006_Ramadan_Offensive
mw-redirect
2006 Ramadan Offensive

values:
/wiki/2008_Al-Qaeda_offensive_in_Iraq
mw-redirect
2008 Al-Qaeda offensive in Iraq

values:
/wiki/Camp_Ashraf_raid
mw-redirect
Camp Ashraf raid

values: Template talk:Campaignbox Iraq War terrorism

values:
/wiki/Insurgent_attacks_of_the_Iraq_War
mw-redirect
Insurgent attacks of the Iraq War

values: 2003 Jordanian embassy bombing in Baghdad

values:
/wiki/Imam_Ali_Mosque_bombing
mw-redirect
Imam Ali Mosque bombing

values:
/wiki/27_October_2003_Baghdad_bombings
mw-redirect
27 October 2003 Baghdad bombings

values: 2004 Forward Operating Base Marez bombing

values:
/wiki/2006_al-Askari_Mosque_bombing
mw-redirect
2006 al-Askari Mosque bombing

values:
/wiki/Buratha_Mosque_bombing
mw-redirect
Buratha Mosque bombing

values:
/wiki/2007_Abu_Sayda_bombing
mw-redirect
2007 Abu Sayda bombing

values:
/wiki/2007_al-Askari_Mosque_bombing
mw-redirect
2007 al-Askari Mosque bombing

values:
/wiki/2007_al-Khilani_Mosque_bombing
mw-redirect
2007 al-Khilani Mosque bombing

values: 2009 Baghdad police recruitment centre bombing

values:
/wiki/April_2009_Baghdad_bombings
mw-redirect
April 2009 Baghdad bombings

values:
/wiki/4_April_2010_Baghdad_bombings
mw-redirect
4 April 2010 Baghdad bombings

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-subgroup mw-collapsible mw-collapsed mw-made-collapsible

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values: Template talk:Campaignbox Persian Gulf Wars

values: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner mw-collapsible mw-made-collapsible mw-collapsed

values:
/wiki/George_W._Bush_administration
mw-redirect
George W. Bush administration

values:
/wiki/U.S._Congress
mw-redirect
U.S. Congress

values:
/wiki/Weapons_of_mass_destruction
mw-redirect
Weapons of mass destruction

values:
/wiki/UN_Security_Council
mw-redirect
UN Security Council

values: United Nations Security Council Resolution 1441

values: UN Monitoring and Verification Commission

values: checkbox button toctogglecheckbox toctogglecheckbox display:none

values:
/wiki/Iraq_sanctions
mw-redirect
Iraq sanctions

values: United Nations Security Council Resolution 687

values:
/wiki/Operation_Desert_Fox
mw-redirect
Operation Desert Fox

values:
/wiki/United_States_Republican_Party
mw-redirect
United States Republican Party

values:
/wiki/U.S._presidential_election,_2000
mw-redirect
U.S. presidential election, 2000

values:
/wiki/Paul_O%27Neill_(cabinet_member)
mw-redirect
Paul O'Neill (cabinet member)

values:
/wiki/September_11,_2001_attacks
mw-redirect
September 11, 2001 attacks

attrs: alt src width height class data-file-width data-file-height

values:
/wiki/Iraq_War_Resolution
mw-redirect
Iraq War Resolution

values: Edit section: Weapons of mass destruction

values:
/wiki/Security_Council
mw-redirect
Security Council

values: United States Deputy Secretary of Defense

values: Edit section: U.N. inspections before the invasion

values: Edit section: Formal search after the invasion

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2016)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Unmanned_Aerial_Vehicle
mw-redirect
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

values:
/wiki/Charles_Duelfer
mw-redirect
Charles Duelfer

values: Edit section: Discovery of chemical weapons

values:
/wiki/Peter_Hoekstra
mw-redirect
Peter Hoekstra

values:
/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_war
mw-redirect
Iran–Iraq war

values:
quotebox pullquote floatright
width:33%; ;

values:
/wiki/Downing_Street_Memo
mw-redirect
Downing Street Memo

values:
/wiki/Charles_Robb
mw-redirect
Charles Robb

values: Edit section: Iraqi links to terrorist organizations

values:
/wiki/Saddam_Hussein_and_al-Qaeda
mw-redirect
Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda

values:
/wiki/War_on_Terrorism
mw-redirect
War on Terrorism

values:
/wiki/Ahmad_Chalabi
mw-redirect
Ahmad Chalabi

values: Edit section: Other terrorist organizations

values:
/wiki/Human_rights_in_Saddam%27s_Iraq
mw-redirect
Human rights in Saddam's Iraq

values:
/wiki/Halabja_poison_gas_attack
mw-redirect
Halabja poison gas attack

values:
/wiki/Al-Anfal_Campaign
mw-redirect
Al-Anfal Campaign

values: United States presidential election, 2000

values:
/wiki/UN_sanctions_against_Iraq
mw-redirect
UN sanctions against Iraq

values: Edit section: Oil not a factor in the Iraq war

values: Edit section: Oil a factor in the Iraq war

values: Paul O'Neill (Secretary of the Treasury)

values:
/wiki/Wlodzimierz_Cimoszewicz
mw-redirect
Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz

values:
/wiki/Gregory_Palast
mw-redirect
Gregory Palast

values:
/wiki/Harken_Energy
mw-redirect
Harken Energy

values: National Security Advisor (United States)

values: List of countries by proven oil reserves

values: Edit section: Strategic importance of oil

values:
/wiki/Proven_oil_reserves
mw-redirect
Proven oil reserves

values:
/wiki/James_Baker_Institute
mw-redirect
James Baker Institute

values:
/wiki/William_Kristol
mw-redirect
William Kristol

values:
/wiki/Richard_Armitage_(politician)
mw-redirect
Richard Armitage (politician)

values:
/wiki/Peter_W._Rodman
mw-redirect
Peter W. Rodman

values:
/wiki/Robert_B._Zoellick
mw-redirect
Robert B. Zoellick

values:
/wiki/Lewis_Libby
mw-redirect
Lewis Libby

values: International Institute for Strategic Studies

values:
/wiki/Seif_al-Adl
mw-redirect
Seif al-Adl

values: Edit section: Bringing democracy to the Middle East

values:
/wiki/Human_rights_abuses
mw-redirect
Human rights abuses

values: Edit section: Establishing long term Middle East military presence

values: Edit section: Purported Iraqi intelligence plots

values:
/wiki/Beslan_school_hostage_crisis
mw-redirect
Beslan school hostage crisis

values: Edit section: Criticisms of the rationale for the Iraq war

values:
/wiki/Protests_against_the_Iraq_war
mw-redirect
Protests against the Iraq war

values: Public relations preparations for 2003 invasion of Iraq

values:
/wiki/United_Nations_Secretary-General
mw-redirect
United Nations Secretary-General

values:
/wiki/Multinational_force_in_Iraq
mw-redirect
Multinational force in Iraq

values: Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs

values:
/wiki/Gerhard_Schroeder
mw-redirect
Gerhard Schroeder

values:
/wiki/Iraq_resolution
mw-redirect
Iraq resolution

values:
/wiki/Legality_of_the_Iraq_war
mw-redirect
Legality of the Iraq war

values:
/wiki/Yellowcake_forgery
mw-redirect
Yellowcake forgery

values: The UN Security Council and the Iraq war

values:
nofollow
external autonumber
http://www.cnn.com

values:
nofollow
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/duelfer/
external text

values: Category:CS1 maint: BOT: original-url status unknown

values:
nofollow
http://www.unmovic.org/
external text

values:
/wiki/Senate_Armed_Services_Committee
mw-redirect
Senate Armed Services Committee

values:
/wiki/Christian_Science_Monitor
mw-redirect
Christian Science Monitor

values:
nofollow
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3294143/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://hrw.org/wr2k4/3.htm

values:
nofollow
https://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://mattwelch.com/Press/UPImead.htm

values:
/wiki/Significance_(journal)
mw-redirect
Significance (journal)

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00135

values:
/wiki/The_White_House
mw-redirect
The White House

values:
nofollow
http://www.alternet.org/story/17923/
external text

values: This citation requires a reference to the specific page or range of pages in which the material appears. (September 2010)

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values: Popular opinion in the United States on the invasion of Iraq

values: WMD conjecture in the aftermath of the 2003 invasion of Iraq

values: American-led intervention in Iraq (2014–present)

values: United Nations Security Council and the Iraq War

values: Governmental positions on the Iraq War prior to the 2003 invasion of Iraq

values: April 8, 2003 journalist deaths by U.S. fire

values:
/wiki/History_of_Iraq_(2003%E2%80%9311)
mw-redirect
History of Iraq (2003–11)

values: List of coalition military operations of the Iraq War

values: List of aviation shootdowns and accidents during the Iraq War

values: List of people associated with the 2003 invasion of Iraq

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values:
https://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Iraq_War
extiw
n:Iraq War

values: Category:Causes and prelude of the Iraq War

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Webarchive template other archives

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from February 2018

values: Category:Articles with permanently dead external links

values: Category:Pages with citations having bare URLs

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from March 2017

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2010

values: Category:CS1 errors: missing author or editor

values: Category:Pages using military navigation subgroups without wide style

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2016

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values: Justificación de la guerra de Irak – Spanish

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War rootpage-Rationale_for_the_Iraq_War skin-vector action-view