text:
Compass-and-straightedge construction
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Creating a regular hexagon with a straightedge and compass
Geometry
Projecting a sphere to a plane.
Outline
History
Branches[show]
Euclidean
Spherical
Non-Euclidean
Elliptic
Hyperbolic
Synthetic
Analytic
Algebraic
Riemannian
Differential
Symplectic
Finite
Projective
Concepts
Features
[show]
Dimension
Compass-and-straightedge constructions
Angle
Curve
Diagonal
Orthogonal (Perpendicular)
Parallel
Vertex
Congruence
Similarity
Symmetry
Zero / One-dimensional[show]
Point
Line
segment
ray
Length
Two-dimensional[show]
Plane
Area
Polygon
Triangle
Altitude
Hypotenuse
Pythagorean theorem
Parallelogram
Square
Rectangle
Rhombus
Rhomboid
Quadrilateral
Trapezoid
Kite
Circle
Diameter
Circumference
Area
Three-dimensional[show]
Volume
Cube
cuboid
Cylinder
Pyramid
Sphere
Four- / other-dimensional[show]
Tesseract
Hypersphere
Geometers
by name[show]
Aida
Aryabhata
Ahmes
Alhazen
Apollonius
Archimedes
Atiyah
Baudhayana
Bolyai
Brahmagupta
Cartan
Coxeter
Descartes
Euclid
Euler
Gauss
Gromov
Hilbert
Jyeṣṭhadeva
Kātyāyana
Khayyám
Klein
Lobachevsky
Manava
Minkowski
Minggatu
Pascal
Pythagoras
Parameshvara
Poincaré
Riemann
Sakabe
Sijzi
al-Tusi
Veblen
Virasena
Yang Hui
al-Yasamin
Zhang
List of geometers
by period[show]
BCE
Ahmes
Baudhayana
Manava
Pythagoras
Euclid
Archimedes
Apollonius
1–1400s
Zhang
Kātyāyana
Aryabhata
Brahmagupta
Virasena
Alhazen
Sijzi
Khayyám
al-Yasamin
al-Tusi
Yang Hui
Parameshvara
1400s–1700s
Jyeṣṭhadeva
Descartes
Pascal
Minggatu
Euler
Sakabe
Aida
1700s–1900s
Gauss
Lobachevsky
Bolyai
Riemann
Klein
Poincaré
Hilbert
Minkowski
Cartan
Veblen
Coxeter
Present day
Atiyah
Gromov
Geometry portal
v
t
e
Compass-and-straightedge construction, also known as ruler-and-compass construction or classical construction, is the construction of lengths, angles, and other geometric figures using only an idealized ruler and compass.
The idealized ruler, known as a straightedge, is assumed to be infinite in length, and has no markings on it with only one edge. The compass is assumed to collapse when lifted from the page, so may not be directly used to transfer distances. (This is an unimportant restriction since, using a multi-step procedure, a distance can be transferred even with collapsing compass; see compass equivalence theorem.) More formally, the only permissible constructions are those granted by Euclid's first three postulates.
It turns out to be the case that every point constructible using straightedge and compass may also be constructed using compass alone.
The ancient Greek mathematicians first conceived compass-and-straightedge constructions, and a number of ancient problems in plane geometry impose this restriction. The ancient Greeks developed many constructions, but in some cases were unable to do so. Gauss showed that some polygons are constructible but that most are not. Some of the most famous straightedge-and-compass problems were proven impossible by Pierre Wantzel in 1837, using the mathematical theory of fields.
In spite of existing proofs of impossibility, some persist in trying to solve these problems.[1] Many of these problems are easily solvable provided that other geometric transformations are allowed: for example, doubling the cube is possible using geometric constructions, but not possible using straightedge and compass alone.
In terms of algebra, a length is constructible if and only if it represents a constructible number, and an angle is constructible if and only if its cosine is a constructible number. A number is constructible if and only if it can be written using the four basic arithmetic operations and the extraction of square roots but of no higher-order roots.
Contents
[hide]
1 Compass and straightedge tools
2 History
3 The basic constructions
4 Much used compass-and-straightedge constructions
5 Constructible points and lengths
5.1 Formal proof
6 Constructible angles
7 Compass and straightedge constructions as complex arithmetic
8 Impossible constructions
8.1 Squaring the circle
8.2 Doubling the cube
8.3 Angle trisection
9 Constructing regular polygons
10 Constructing a triangle from three given characteristic points or lengths
11 Distance to an ellipse
12 Constructing with only ruler or only compass
13 Extended constructions
13.1 Solid constructions
13.2 Angle trisection
13.3 Origami
13.4 Markable rulers
14 Computation of binary digits
15 See also
16 References
17 External links
Compass and straightedge tools[edit]
Compass and straightedge
A compass
The "compass" and "straightedge" of compass and straightedge constructions are idealizations of rulers and compasses in the real world:
The compass can be opened arbitrarily wide, but (unlike some real compasses) it has no markings on it. Circles can only be drawn starting from two given points: the centre and a point on the circle. The compass may or may not collapse when it's not drawing a circle.
The straightedge is infinitely long, but it has no markings on it and has only one straight edge, unlike ordinary rulers. It can only be used to draw a line segment between two points or to extend an existing segment.
The modern compass generally does not collapse and several modern constructions use this feature. It would appear that the modern compass is a "more powerful" instrument than the ancient collapsing compass. However, by Proposition 2 of Book 1 of Euclid's Elements, no power is lost by using a collapsing compass. Although the proposition is correct, its proofs have a long and checkered history.[2]
Each construction must be exact. "Eyeballing" it (essentially looking at the construction and guessing at its accuracy, or using some form of measurement, such as the units of measure on a ruler) and getting close does not count as a solution.
Each construction must terminate. That is, it must have a finite number of steps, and not be the limit of ever closer approximations.
Stated this way, compass and straightedge constructions appear to be a parlour game, rather than a serious practical problem; but the purpose of the restriction is to ensure that constructions can be proven to be exactly correct, and is thus important to both drafting (design by both CAD software and traditional drafting with pencil, paper, straight-edge and compass) and the science of weights and measures, in which exact synthesis from reference bodies or materials is extremely important.[citation needed] One of the chief purposes of Greek mathematics was to find exact constructions for various lengths; for example, the side of a pentagon inscribed in a given circle. The Greeks could not find constructions for these three problems, among others:
Squaring the circle: Drawing a square the same area as a given circle.
Doubling the cube: Drawing a cube with twice the volume of a given cube.
Trisecting the angle: Dividing a given angle into three smaller angles all of the same size.
For 2000 years people tried to find constructions within the limits set above, and failed. All three have now been proven under mathematical rules to be generally impossible (angles with certain values can be trisected, but not all possible angles).
History[edit]
The ancient Greek mathematicians first attempted compass-and-straightedge constructions, and they discovered how to construct sums, differences, products, ratios, and square roots of given lengths.[3]:p. 1 They could also construct half of a given angle, a square whose area is twice that of another square, a square having the same area as a given polygon, and a regular polygon with 3, 4, or 5 sides[3]:p. xi (or one with twice the number of sides of a given polygon[3]:pp. 49–50). But they could not construct one third of a given angle except in particular cases, or a square with the same area as a given circle, or a regular polygon with other numbers of sides.[3]:p. xi Nor could they construct the side of a cube whose volume would be twice the volume of a cube with a given side.[3]:p. 29
Hippocrates and Menaechmus showed that the area of the cube could be doubled by finding the intersections of hyperbolas and parabolas, but these cannot be constructed by compass and straightedge.[3]:p. 30 In the fifth century BCE, Hippias used a curve that he called a quadratrix to both trisect the general angle and square the circle, and Nicomedes in the second century BCE showed how to use a conchoid to trisect an arbitrary angle;[3]:p. 37 but these methods also cannot be followed with just compass and straightedge.
No progress on the unsolved problems was made for two millennia, until in 1796 Gauss showed that a regular polygon with 17 sides could be constructed; five years later he showed the sufficient criterion for a regular polygon of n sides to be constructible.[3]:pp. 51 ff.
In 1837 Pierre Wantzel published a proof of the impossibility of trisecting an arbitrary angle or of doubling the volume of a cube, based on the impossibility of constructing cube roots of lengths.[4] He also showed that Gauss's sufficient constructibility condition for regular polygons is also necessary.
Then in 1882 Lindemann showed that π {\displaystyle \pi } is a transcendental number, and thus that it is impossible by straightedge and compass to construct a square with the same area as a given circle.[3]:p. 47
The basic constructions[edit]
The basic constructions
All compass and straightedge constructions consist of repeated application of five basic constructions using the points, lines and circles that have already been constructed. These are:
Creating the line through two existing points
Creating the circle through one point with centre another point
Creating the point which is the intersection of two existing, non-parallel lines
Creating the one or two points in the intersection of a line and a circle (if they intersect)
Creating the one or two points in the intersection of two circles (if they intersect).
For example, starting with just two distinct points, we can create a line or either of two circles (in turn, using each point as centre and passing through the other point). If we draw both circles, two new points are created at their intersections. Drawing lines between the two original points and one of these new points completes the construction of an equilateral triangle.
Therefore, in any geometric problem we have an initial set of symbols (points and lines), an algorithm, and some results. From this perspective, geometry is equivalent to an axiomatic algebra, replacing its elements by symbols. Probably Gauss first realized this, and used it to prove the impossibility of some constructions; only much later did Hilbert find a complete set of axioms for geometry.
Much used compass-and-straightedge constructions[edit]
The most-used compass-and-straightedge constructions include:
Constructing the perpendicular bisector from a segment
Finding the midpoint of a segment.
Drawing a perpendicular line from a point to a line.
Bisecting an angle
Mirroring a point in a line
Constructing a line through a point tangent to a circle
Constructing a circle through 3 noncollinear points
Constructible points and lengths[edit]
Formal proof[edit]
There are many different ways to prove something is impossible. A more rigorous proof would be to demarcate the limit of the possible, and show that to solve these problems one must transgress that limit. Much of what can be constructed is covered in intercept theory.
We could associate an algebra to our geometry using a Cartesian coordinate system made of two lines, and represent points of our plane by vectors. Finally we can write these vectors as complex numbers.
Using the equations for lines and circles, one can show that the points at which they intersect lie in a quadratic extension of the smallest field F containing two points on the line, the center of the circle, and the radius of the circle. That is, they are of the form x +y√k, where x, y, and k are in F.
Since the field of constructible points is closed under square roots, it contains all points that can be obtained by a finite sequence of quadratic extensions of the field of complex numbers with rational coefficients. By the above paragraph, one can show that any constructible point can be obtained by such a sequence of extensions. As a corollary of this, one finds that the degree of the minimal polynomial for a constructible point (and therefore of any constructible length) is a power of 2. In particular, any constructible point (or length) is an algebraic number, though not every algebraic number is constructible; for example, 3√2 is algebraic but not constructible.
Constructible angles[edit]
There is a bijection between the angles that are constructible and the points that are constructible on any constructible circle. The angles that are constructible form an abelian group under addition modulo 2π (which corresponds to multiplication of the points on the unit circle viewed as complex numbers). The angles that are constructible are exactly those whose tangent (or equivalently, sine or cosine) is constructible as a number. For example, the regular heptadecagon (the seventeen-sided regular polygon) is constructible because
cos  ( 2 π 17 ) = − 1 16 + 1 16 17 + 1 16 34 − 2 17 + 1 8 17 + 3 17 − 34 − 2 17 − 2 34 + 2 17 {\displaystyle \cos {\left({\frac {2\pi }{17}}\right)}=-{\frac {1}{16}}\;+\;{\frac {1}{16}}{\sqrt {17}}\;+\;{\frac {1}{16}}{\sqrt {34-2{\sqrt {17}}}}\;+\;{\frac {1}{8}}{\sqrt {17+3{\sqrt {17}}-{\sqrt {34-2{\sqrt {17}}}}-2{\sqrt {34+2{\sqrt {17}}}}}}}
as discovered by Gauss.[5]
The group of constructible angles is closed under the operation that halves angles (which corresponds to taking square roots in the complex numbers). The only angles of finite order that may be constructed starting with two points are those whose order is either a power of two, or a product of a power of two and a set of distinct Fermat primes. In addition there is a dense set of constructible angles of infinite order.
Compass and straightedge constructions as complex arithmetic[edit]
Given a set of points in the Euclidean plane, selecting any one of them to be called 0 and another to be called 1, together with an arbitrary choice of orientation allows us to consider the points as a set of complex numbers.
Given any such interpretation of a set of points as complex numbers, the points constructible using valid compass and straightedge constructions alone are precisely the elements of the smallest field containing the original set of points and closed under the complex conjugate and square root operations (to avoid ambiguity, we can specify the square root with complex argument less than π). The elements of this field are precisely those that may be expressed as a formula in the original points using only the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, complex conjugate, and square root, which is easily seen to be a countable dense subset of the plane. Each of these six operations corresponding to a simple compass and straightedge construction. From such a formula it is straightforward to produce a construction of the corresponding point by combining the constructions for each of the arithmetic operations. More efficient constructions of a particular set of points correspond to shortcuts in such calculations.
Equivalently (and with no need to arbitrarily choose two points) we can say that, given an arbitrary choice of orientation, a set of points determines a set of complex ratios given by the ratios of the differences between any two pairs of points. The set of ratios constructible using compass and straightedge from such a set of ratios is precisely the smallest field containing the original ratios and closed under taking complex conjugates and square roots.
For example, the real part, imaginary part and modulus of a point or ratio z (taking one of the two viewpoints above) are constructible as these may be expressed as
R e ( z ) = z + z ¯ 2 {\displaystyle \mathrm {Re} (z)={\frac {z+{\bar {z}}}{2}}\;}
I m ( z ) = z − z ¯ 2 i {\displaystyle \mathrm {Im} (z)={\frac {z-{\bar {z}}}{2i}}\;}
| z | = z z ¯ . {\displaystyle \left|z\right|={\sqrt {z{\bar {z}}}}.\;}
Doubling the cube and trisection of an angle (except for special angles such as any φ such that φ/2π is a rational number with denominator not divisible by 3) require ratios which are the solution to cubic equations, while squaring the circle requires a transcendental ratio. None of these are in the fields described, hence no compass and straightedge construction for these exists.
Impossible constructions[edit]
The ancient Greeks thought that the construction problems they could not solve were simply obstinate, not unsolvable.[6] With modern methods, however, these compass-and-straightedge constructions have been shown to be logically impossible to perform. (The problems themselves, however, are solvable, and the Greeks knew how to solve them, without the constraint of working only with straightedge and compass.)
Squaring the circle[edit]
Main article: Squaring the circle
The most famous of these problems, squaring the circle, otherwise known as the quadrature of the circle, involves constructing a square with the same area as a given circle using only straightedge and compass.
Squaring the circle has been proven impossible, as it involves generating a transcendental number, that is, √π. Only certain algebraic numbers can be constructed with ruler and compass alone, namely those constructed from the integers with a finite sequence of operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and taking square roots. The phrase "squaring the circle" is often used to mean "doing the impossible" for this reason.
Without the constraint of requiring solution by ruler and compass alone, the problem is easily solvable by a wide variety of geometric and algebraic means, and was solved many times in antiquity.[7]
A method which comes very close to approximating the "quadrature of the circle" can be achieved using a Kepler triangle.
Doubling the cube[edit]
Main article: Doubling the cube
Doubling the cube is the construction, using only a straight-edge and compass, of the edge of a cube that has twice the volume of a cube with a given edge. This is impossible because the cube root of 2, though algebraic, cannot be computed from integers by addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and taking square roots. This follows because its minimal polynomial over the rationals has degree 3. This construction is possible using a straightedge with two marks on it and a compass.
Angle trisection[edit]
Main article: Angle trisection
Angle trisection is the construction, using only a straightedge and a compass, of an angle that is one-third of a given arbitrary angle. This is impossible in the general case. For example, though the angle of π/3 radians (60°) cannot be trisected, the angle 2π/5 radians (72° = 360°/5) can be trisected.[8] The general trisection problem is also easily solved when a straightedge with two marks on it is allowed (a neusis construction).
Constructing regular polygons[edit]
Main article: Constructible polygon
Construction of a regular pentagon
Some regular polygons (e.g. a pentagon) are easy to construct with straightedge and compass; others are not. This led to the question: Is it possible to construct all regular polygons with straightedge and compass?
Carl Friedrich Gauss in 1796 showed that a regular 17-sided polygon can be constructed, and five years later showed that a regular n-sided polygon can be constructed with straightedge and compass if the odd prime factors of n are distinct Fermat primes. Gauss conjectured that this condition was also necessary, but he offered no proof of this fact, which was provided by Pierre Wantzel in 1837.[9]
The first few constructible regular polygons have the following numbers of sides:
3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 20, 24, 30, 32, 34, 40, 48, 51, 60, 64, 68, 80, 85, 96, 102, 120, 128, 136, 160, 170, 192, 204, 240, 255, 256, 257, 272... (sequence A003401 in the OEIS)
There are known to be an infinitude of constructible regular polygons with an even number of sides (because if a regular n-gon is constructible, then so is a regular 2n-gon and hence a regular 4n-gon, 8n-gon, etc.). However, there are only 31 known constructible regular n-gons with an odd number of sides.
Constructing a triangle from three given characteristic points or lengths[edit]
Sixteen key points of a triangle are its vertices, the midpoints of its sides, the feet of its altitudes, the feet of its internal angle bisectors, and its circumcenter, centroid, orthocenter, and incenter. These can be taken three at a time to yield 139 distinct nontrivial problems of constructing a triangle from three points.[10] Of these problems, three involve a point that can be uniquely constructed from the other two points; 23 can be non-uniquely constructed (in fact for infinitely many solutions) but only if the locations of the points obey certain constraints; in 74 the problem is constructible in the general case; and in 39 the required triangle exists but is not constructible.
Twelve key lengths of a triangle are the three side lengths, the three altitudes, the three medians, and the three angle bisectors. Together with the three angles, these give 95 distinct combinations, 63 of which give rise to a constructible triangle, 30 of which do not, and two of which are underdefined.[11]:pp. 201–203
Distance to an ellipse[edit]
The line segment from any point in the plane to the nearest point on a circle can be constructed, but the segment from any point in the plane to the nearest point on an ellipse of positive eccentricity cannot in general be constructed.[12]
Constructing with only ruler or only compass[edit]
It is possible (according to the Mohr–Mascheroni theorem) to construct anything with just a compass if it can be constructed with a ruler and compass, provided that the given data and the data to be found consist of discrete points (not lines or circles). It should be noted that the truth of this theorem depends on the truth of Archimedes' axiom,[13] which is not first-order in nature. It is impossible to take a square root with just a ruler, so some things that cannot be constructed with a ruler can be constructed with a compass; but (by the Poncelet–Steiner theorem) given a single circle and its center, they can be constructed.
Extended constructions[edit]
The ancient Greeks classified constructions into three major categories, depending on the complexity of the tools required for their solution. If a construction used only a straightedge and compass, it was called planar; if it also required one or more conic sections (other than the circle), then it was called solid; the third category included all constructions that did not fall into either of the other two categories.[14] This categorization meshes nicely with our modern algebraic point of view. A complex number that can be expressed using only the field operations and square roots (as described above) has a planar construction. A complex number that includes also the extraction of cube roots has a solid construction.
In the language of fields, a complex number that is planar has degree a power of two, and lies in a field extension that can be broken down into a tower of fields where each extension has degree two. A complex number that has a solid construction has degree with prime factors of only two and three, and lies in a field extension that is at the top of a tower of fields where each extension has degree 2 or 3.
Solid constructions[edit]
A point has a solid construction if it can be constructed using a straightedge, compass, and a (possibly hypothetical) conic drawing tool that can draw any conic with already constructed focus, directrix, and eccentricity. The same set of points can often be constructed using a smaller set of tools. For example, using a compass, straightedge, and a piece of paper on which we have the parabola y=x2 together with the points (0,0) and (1,0), one can construct any complex number that has a solid construction. Likewise, a tool that can draw any ellipse with already constructed foci and major axis (think two pins and a piece of string) is just as powerful.[15]
The ancient Greeks knew that doubling the cube and trisecting an arbitrary angle both had solid constructions. Archimedes gave a solid construction of the regular 7-gon. The quadrature of the circle does not have a solid construction.
A regular n-gon has a solid construction if and only if n=2j3km where m is a product of distinct Pierpont primes (primes of the form 2r3s+1). The set of such n is the sequence
7, 9, 13, 14, 18, 19, 21, 26, 27, 28, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 42, 45, 52, 54, 56, 57, 63, 65, 70, 72, 73, 74, 76, 78, 81, 84, 90, 91, 95, 97... (sequence A051913 in the OEIS)
The set of n for which a regular n-gon has no solid construction is the sequence
11, 22, 23, 25, 29, 31, 33, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47, 49, 50, 53, 55, 58, 59, 61, 62, 66, 67, 69, 71, 75, 77, 79, 82, 83, 86, 87, 88, 89, 92, 93, 94, 98, 99, 100... (sequence A048136 in the OEIS)
Like the question with Fermat primes, it is an open question as to whether there are an infinite number of Pierpont primes.
Angle trisection[edit]
What if, together with the straightedge and compass, we had a tool that could (only) trisect an arbitrary angle? Such constructions are solid constructions, but there exist numbers with solid constructions that cannot be constructed using such a tool. For example, we cannot double the cube with such a tool.[16] On the other hand, every regular n-gon that has a solid construction can be constructed using such a tool.
Origami[edit]
Main article: Huzita–Hatori axioms
The mathematical theory of origami is more powerful than compass and straightedge construction. Folds satisfying the Huzita–Hatori axioms can construct exactly the same set of points as the extended constructions using a compass and conic drawing tool. Therefore, origami can also be used to solve cubic equations (and hence quartic equations), and thus solve two of the classical problems.[17]
Markable rulers[edit]
Main article: Neusis construction
Archimedes, Nicomedes and Apollonius gave constructions involving the use of a markable ruler. This would permit them, for example, to take a line segment, two lines (or circles), and a point; and then draw a line which passes through the given point and intersects both lines, and such that the distance between the points of intersection equals the given segment. This the Greeks called neusis ("inclination", "tendency" or "verging"), because the new line tends to the point. In this expanded scheme, we can trisect an arbitrary angle (see Archimedes' trisection) or extract an arbitrary cube root (due to Nicomedes). Hence, any distance whose ratio to an existing distance is the solution of a cubic or a quartic equation is constructible. Regular polygons with solid constructions, like the heptagon, are constructible; and John H. Conway and Richard K. Guy give constructions for several of them;.[18]
The neusis construction is more powerful than a conic drawing tool, as one can construct complex numbers that do not have solid constructions. In fact, using this tool one can solve some quintics that are not solvable using radicals.[19] It is known that one cannot solve an irreducible polynomial of prime degree greater or equal to 7 using the neusis construction, so it is not possible to construct a regular 23-gon or 29-gon using this tool. Benjamin and Snyder proved that it is possible to construct the regular 11-gon, but did not give a construction.[20] It is still open as to whether a regular 25-gon or 31-gon is constructible using this tool.
Computation of binary digits[edit]
In 1998 Simon Plouffe gave a ruler and compass algorithm that can be used to compute binary digits of certain numbers.[21] The algorithm involves the repeated doubling of an angle and becomes physically impractical after about 20 binary digits.
See also[edit]
Carlyle circle
Geometric cryptography
Geometrography
List of interactive geometry software, most of them show compass and straightedge constructions
Underwood Dudley, a mathematician who has made a sideline of collecting false ruler-and-compass proofs.
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Underwood Dudley (1983), "What To Do When the Trisector Comes" (PDF), The Mathematical Intelligencer, 5 (1): 20–25, doi:10.1007/bf03023502
Jump up ^ Godfried Toussaint, "A new look at Euclid’s second proposition," The Mathematical Intelligencer, Vol. 15, No. 3, (1993), pp. 12-24.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i Bold, Benjamin. Famous Problems of Geometry and How to Solve Them, Dover Publications, 1982 (orig. 1969).
Jump up ^ Wantzel, P M L (1837). "Recherches sur les moyens de reconnaître si un problème de Géométrie peut se résoudre avec la règle et le compas." (PDF). Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées. 1. 2: 366–372. Retrieved 3 March 2014.
Jump up ^ Weisstein, Eric W. "Trigonometry Angles--Pi/17". MathWorld.
Jump up ^ Stewart, Ian. Galois Theory. p. 75.
Jump up ^ *Squaring the circle at MacTutor
Jump up ^ Instructions for trisecting a 72˚ angle.
Jump up ^ Kazarinoff, Nicholas D. (2003). Ruler and the Round. Mineola, N.Y.: Dover. pp. 29–30. ISBN 0-486-42515-0.
Jump up ^ Pascal Schreck, Pascal Mathis, Vesna Marinkoviċ, and Predrag Janičiċ. "Wernick's list: A final update", Forum Geometricorum 16, 2016, pp. 69–80. http://forumgeom.fau.edu/FG2016volume16/FG201610.pdf
Jump up ^ Posamentier, Alfred S., and Lehmann, Ingmar. The Secrets of Triangles, Prometheus Books, 2012.
Jump up ^ Azad, H., and Laradji, A., "Some impossible constructions in elementary geometry", Mathematical Gazette 88, November 2004, 548–551.
Jump up ^ Arnon Avron, "On strict strong constructibility with a compass alone", Journal of Geometry (1990) 38: 12.
Jump up ^ T.L. Heath, "A History of Greek Mathematics, Volume I"
Jump up ^ P. Hummel, "Solid constructions using ellipses", The Pi Mu Epsilon Journal, 11(8), 429 -- 435 (2003)
Jump up ^ Gleason, Andrew: "Angle trisection, the heptagon, and the triskaidecagon", Amer. Math. Monthly 95 (1988), no. 3, 185-194.
Jump up ^ Row, T. Sundara (1966). Geometric Exercises in Paper Folding. New York: Dover.
Jump up ^ Conway, John H. and Richard Guy: The Book of Numbers
Jump up ^ A. Baragar, "Constructions using a Twice-Notched Straightedge", The American Mathematical Monthly, 109 (2), 151 -- 164 (2002).
Jump up ^ E. Benjamin, C. Snyder, "On the construction of the regular hendecagon by marked ruler and compass", Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 156 (3), 409 -- 424 (2014).
Jump up ^ Simon Plouffe (1998). "The Computation of Certain Numbers Using a Ruler and Compass". Journal of Integer Sequences. 1. ISSN 1530-7638.
External links[edit]
Regular polygon constructions by Dr. Math at The Math Forum @ Drexel
Construction with the Compass Only at cut-the-knot
Angle Trisection by Hippocrates at cut-the-knot
Weisstein, Eric W. "Angle Trisection". MathWorld.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Compass-and-straightedge_construction&oldid=808419517"
Categories:
Compass and straightedge constructions
Hidden categories:
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from October 2011
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Български
Català
Čeština
Deutsch
Español
Esperanto
Français
한국어
हिन्दी
Italiano
עברית
Қазақша
Magyar
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Plattdüütsch
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Simple English
Српски / srpski
Suomi
Svenska
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Việt
文言
粵語
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 2 November 2017, at 19:20.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href class title

attrs: class style

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top: 1px solid #aaa; border-bottom: 1px solid #aaa;border:none; background:#ddf;padding:0 0 0.15em;text-align:center; display:block;margin:0 1px 0.4em;

values:
/wiki/Branches_of_geometry
mw-redirect
Branches of geometry

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0.4em; text-align: center; display: none;

values:
/wiki/Ray_(geometry)
mw-redirect
Ray (geometry)

values: padding:0 0.1em 0.4em;padding:0.2em 0.4em 0.6em;

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;border-collapse:collapse; border-spacing:0px; border:none; width:100%; margin:0px; font-size:100%; clear:none; float:none

values: font-size: 105%; padding: 0.2em 0px 0px; text-align: center; display: none;

values:
/wiki/Cylinder_(geometry)
mw-redirect
Cylinder (geometry)

values:
/wiki/Omar_Khayy%C3%A1m
mw-redirect
Omar Khayyám

values:
/wiki/Before_Common_Era
mw-redirect
Before Common Era

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%;background:white;

values:
/wiki/Euclidean_plane_geometry
mw-redirect
Euclidean plane geometry

values:
/wiki/Field_theory_(mathematics)
mw-redirect
Field theory (mathematics)

values: Edit section: Compass and straightedge tools

values:
/wiki/Compass_(drafting)
mw-redirect
Compass (drafting)

values:
/wiki/CAD_software
mw-redirect
CAD software

values: Restriction to compass and straightedge tools in these areas is highly doubtful (October 2011)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values: vertical-align: -0.338ex; width:1.342ex; height:1.676ex;

values:
/wiki/Abstract_Algebra
mw-redirect
Abstract Algebra

values: Edit section: Much used compass-and-straightedge constructions

values: Edit section: Constructible points and lengths

values: margin-right: -0.5em; vertical-align: 0.8em;

values: vertical-align: -2.505ex; width:102.379ex; height:6.509ex;

values:
/wiki/Fermat_primes
mw-redirect
Fermat primes

values: Edit section: Compass and straightedge constructions as complex arithmetic

values:
/wiki/Euclidean_plane
mw-redirect
Euclidean plane

values:
/wiki/Orientation_(mathematics)
mw-redirect
Orientation (mathematics)

values:
/wiki/Complex_argument
mw-redirect
Complex argument

values: vertical-align: -1.838ex; width:15.539ex; height:5.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -1.838ex; width:15.571ex; height:5.176ex;

values: vertical-align: -0.838ex; width:11.176ex; height:3.009ex;

values:
/wiki/Cubic_equation
mw-redirect
Cubic equation

values: Edit section: Constructing regular polygons

values:
/wiki/Fermat_prime
mw-redirect
Fermat prime

values:
/wiki/Necessary_condition
mw-redirect
Necessary condition

values: On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences

values: Edit section: Constructing a triangle from three given characteristic points or lengths

values:
/wiki/Altitude_(geometry)
mw-redirect
Altitude (geometry)

values: Edit section: Constructing with only ruler or only compass

values:
/wiki/Quartic_equation
mw-redirect
Quartic equation

values:
/wiki/John_H._Conway
mw-redirect
John H. Conway

values:
/wiki/Abel-Ruffini_theorem
mw-redirect
Abel-Ruffini theorem

values: Edit section: Computation of binary digits

values:
/wiki/Binary_digit
mw-redirect
Binary digit

values:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1007%2Fbf03023502

values:
/wiki/Andrew_Gleason
mw-redirect
Andrew Gleason

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/1530-7638

values: Category:Compass and straightedge constructions

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from October 2011

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: إنشاءات الفرجار والمسطرة – Arabic

values: Построения с линийка и пергел – Bulgarian

values: Construcció amb regle i compàs – Catalan

values: Konstruktion mit Zirkel und Lineal – German

values: interlanguage-link interwiki-es badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

values: Construction à la règle et au compas – French

values: 컴퍼스와 자 작도 – Korean

values: निर्मेय – Hindi

values: Costruzioni con riga e compasso – Italian

values: בנייה בסרגל ובמחוגה – Hebrew

values: Геометриялық салу – Kazakh

values: Constructie met passer en liniaal – Dutch

values: 定規とコンパスによる作図 – Japanese

values: Konstruksjon i matematikk – Norwegian Nynorsk

values: Konstrukschoon mit Lienholt un Passer – Low German

values: Construções com régua e compasso – Portuguese

values: Construcții geometrice cu rigla și compasul – Romanian

values: Построение с помощью циркуля и линейки – Russian

values: Compass and straightedge construction – Simple English

values: Конструкције лењиром и шестаром – Serbian

values: Geometrinen konstruktiotehtävä – Finnish

values: การสร้างด้วยวงเวียนและสันตรง – Thai

values: Побудова за допомогою циркуля та лінійки – Ukrainian

values: Phép dựng hình bằng thước kẻ và compa – Vietnamese

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Compass-and-straightedge_construction rootpage-Compass-and-straightedge_construction vector-experimental-print-styles vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view


text:
Benton (surname)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Benton is an English surname, which means "town in the bent grass" or "is from the place where the bear grass grows".[1][2] The name may refer to:
Al Benton (1911–1968), American baseball player
Arthur L. Benton (1909–2006), American neuropsychologist
Barbi Benton (born 1950), American model and actress
Bernard Benton (born 1957), American boxer
Billy Benton (1895–1967), English footballer
Brook Benton (1931–1988), American musician
Charles S. Benton (1810–1882), American politician
Dave Benton (born 1951), Aruban-Estonian singer
Don Benton (born 1957), American politician
Eddie Benton (born 1975), American basketball player and coach
Eddie Benton (born 1957), Canadian actress
Glen Benton (born 1967), American bass guitarist
Grady Benton (born 1973), American football player
Jerome Benton (born 1962), American musician
Jesse Benton (born 1977), American political operative
Jessica Benton (born 1942), British actress
Jim Benton (1916–2001), American football player
Jim Benton (born 1960), American illustrator
Joe Benton (born 1933), British politician
John Keith Benton (1896–1956), American theologian and university administrator
Joshua Benton (born 1975), American journalist
Kenneth Benton, (1909–1999), British intelligence officer and author
Lemuel Benton (1754–1818), American politician
Maecenas Benton (1848–1924), American politician
Mark Benton (born 1965), British actor
Michael Benton (born 1956), British paleontontologist
Morris Fuller Benton (1872–1948), American typeface designer
Nathaniel S. Benton (1792–1869), American politician
Nicholas F. Benton (born 1944), American journalist
Rabbit Benton (1901–1984), American baseball player
Robert Benton (born 1932), American screenwriter and film director
Thomas Hart Benton (painter) (1889–1975), American painter
Thomas Hart Benton (senator) (1782–1858), American politician
Walter Benton (poet) (1907–1976), American poet
Walter Benton (1930–2000), American musician
William Benton (senator) (1900–1973), American politician
Fiction[edit]
Peter Benton, fictional character from ER
Sergeant Benton, fictional character from Doctor Who
See also[edit]
Benton (disambiguation)
Brains Benton, children's book series
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Benton | meaning of Benton | name Benton". Thinkbabynames.com. Retrieved 2011-07-11.
Jump up ^ "Benton - Meaning of the boy name Benton at Baby Names Pedia". Babynamespedia.com. Retrieved 2011-07-11.
Surname list
This page lists people with the surname Benton. If an internal link intending to refer to a specific person led you to this page, you may wish to change that link by adding the person's given name(s) to the link.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Benton_(surname)&oldid=810101379"
Categories:
Surnames
English-language surnames
Hidden categories:
Articles with short description
All set index articles
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 13 November 2017, at 09:59.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: b

attrs: href title

value: sup

value: p

value: li

values:
/wiki/Arthur_L._Benton
mw-redirect
Arthur L. Benton

values:
/wiki/Maecenas_Benton
mw-redirect
Maecenas Benton

values:
/wiki/Thomas_Hart_Benton_(senator)
mw-redirect
Thomas Hart Benton (senator)

values:
/wiki/Benton_(disambiguation)
mw-redirect mw-disambig
Benton (disambiguation)

values:
reflist mw-references-wrap
list-style-type: decimal;

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: shortdescription nomobile noexcerpt noprint searchaux

values: padding: 0.25em 0.4em; font-style: italic;

values: metadata plainlinks dmbox dmbox-setindex

values: Category:Articles with short description

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values:
/wiki/Benton_(surname)
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Benton_surname rootpage-Benton_surname skin-vector action-view