text:
Bona fide occupational qualifications
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
In employment law, a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) (US) or bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) (Canada) or genuine occupational qualification (GOQ) (UK) is a quality or an attribute that employers are allowed to consider when making decisions on the hiring and retention of employees – a quality that when considered in other contexts would constitute discrimination and thus be in violation of civil rights employment law. Such qualifications must be listed in the employment offering.
Contents
[hide]
1 Canada
2 United States
3 United Kingdom
4 See also
5 References
6 External links
Canada[edit]
The law of Canada regarding bona fide occupational qualifications was considered in a 1985 Canadian court case involving an employee of the Canadian National Railway, K. S. Bhinder, a Sikh whose religion required that he wear a turban, lost his challenge of the CNR policy that required him to wear a hard hat.[1] In 1990, in deciding another case, the Supreme Court of Canada amended the Bhinder decision: "An employer that has not adopted a policy with respect to accommodation and cannot otherwise satisfy the trier of fact that individual accommodation would result in undue hardship will be required to justify his conduct with respect to the individual complainant. Even then the employer can invoke the BFOQ defence."[2]
United States[edit]
In employment discrimination law in the United States, both Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act contain a BFOQ defense. The BFOQ provision of Title VII provides that:
[I]t shall not be an unlawful employment practice for an employer to hire and employ employees, for an employment agency to classify, or refer for employment any individual, for a labor organization to classify its membership or to classify or refer for employment any individual, or for an employer, labor organization, or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or retraining programs to admit or employ any individual in any such program, on the basis of his religion, sex, or national origin in those certain instances where religion, sex, or national origin is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business or enterprise…[3]
United States Code Title 29 (Labor), Chapter 14 (age discrimination in employment), section 623 (prohibition of age discrimination) establishes that
It shall not be unlawful for an employer, employment agency, or labor organization (1) to take any action otherwise prohibited under subsections (a), (b), (c), or (e) of this section where age is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the particular business, or where the differentiation is based on reasonable factors other than age, or where such practices involve an employee in a workplace in a foreign country, and compliance with such subsections would cause such employer, or a corporation controlled by such employer, to violate the laws of the country in which such workplace is located.[4]
One example of bona fide occupational qualifications are mandatory retirement ages for bus drivers and airline pilots, for safety reasons. Further, in advertising, a manufacturer of men's clothing may lawfully advertise for male models. Religious belief may also be considered a BFOQ; for example, a religious school may lawfully require that members of its faculty be members of that denomination, and may lawfully bar from employment anyone who is not a member.
While religion, sex, or national origin may be considered a bona fide occupational qualification in narrow contexts, race can never be a BFOQ. However, the First Amendment will override Title VII in artistic works where the race of the employee is integral to the story or artistic purpose.[5] (This consideration is not limited to race.)
Bona fide occupational qualifications generally only apply to instances in which the BFOQ is considered reasonably necessary to the normal operation of a particular business. For example, a Catholic college may lawfully require such positions as president, chaplain, and teaching faculty to be Catholics, but membership in the Catholic Church would generally not be considered a BFOQ for occupations such as secretarial and janitorial positions.
Mere customer satisfaction, or lack thereof, is not enough to justify a BFOQ defense, as noted in the cases Diaz v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc.[6] and Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co.[7] Therefore, customer preference for females does not make femininity a BFOQ for the occupation of flight attendant.[8] However, there may be cases in which customer preference is a BFOQ – for example, femininity is reasonably necessary for Playboy Bunnies.[9] Customer preference can "'be taken into account only when it is based on the company's inability to perform the primary function or service it offers,' that is, where sex or sex appeal is itself the dominant service provided."[10]
United Kingdom[edit]
In UK employment discrimination law, a GOQ exists when the nature of a particular job causes the sex or gender of an applicant to become a reasonable cause for choosing one applicant over another. GOQs are a special case exception to the Employment (Sex Discrimination) Act 2000, defined in Section 9 of this act.
There are eight possible types of reason for claiming a GOQ in advertising a particular job:
Jobs in foreign countries with specifically relevant laws or customs
Physiology or authenticity (for example, in choosing actors to play a role),
Privacy and decency of people the employee would be dealing with (for example, staff in a care home),
Private household's integrity (for example, professional careers for an individual, but not normally nannies),
Single-sex accommodation, when it is unreasonable to expect the employer to provide additional accommodation,
Single-sex establishments, for example special prisons and refuges,
Personal welfare and counselling, when sex is directly relevant to the welfare or counselling provided,
When a pair of jobs are advertised specifically for a married couple.
In each of these, reasons must be specific and absolute, not based on stereotypes or generalised assumptions.
See also[edit]
Law portal
Hooters § Legal issues
Personnel selection
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Bhinder v. CN Archived 2007-10-13 at the Wayback Machine. [1985 2 S.C.R. 561]. Supreme Court of Canada (1985). Retrieved on November 15, 2006.
Jump up ^ Central Alberta Dairy Pool v. Alberta (Human Rights Commission) [1990 2 S.C.R. 489 Archived October 18, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.. Supreme Court of Canada (1990). Retrieved on November 15, 2006.
Jump up ^ 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(e) (2010).
Jump up ^ 29 U.S.C. § 623(f)(1) (2010).
Jump up ^ Robinson, Russell (2007). "Casting and Caste-ing: Reconciling Artistic Freedom and Antidiscrimination Norms". California Law Review. 95 (1). JSTOR 20439087.
Jump up ^ "Diaz v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 311 F. Supp. 559 (S.D. Fla. 1970)". Retrieved April 24, 2010.
Jump up ^ Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co., 517 F. Supp. 292 (N.D. Tex. 1981).
Jump up ^ Wilson, 517 F. Supp. at 304.
Jump up ^ Wilson, 517 F. Supp. at 301 (citing dicta in St. Cross v. Playboy Club, Appeal No. 773, Case No. CFS 22618-70 (New York Human Rights Appeal Board, 1971); and Weber v. Playboy Club, Appeal No. 774, Case No. CFS 22619-70 (New York Human Rights Appeal Board, 1971).
Jump up ^ Wilson, 517 F. Supp. at 301 (quoting Diaz).
External links[edit]
'Genuine Occupational Qualifications', A Good Practice Guide for Employers, Department of Trade and Industry, retrieved January 2008.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bona_fide_occupational_qualifications&oldid=807717163"
Categories:
Anti-discrimination law in the United States
United States labor law
Anti-discrimination law in Canada
Canadian labour law
Anti-discrimination law in the United Kingdom
United Kingdom labour law
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
한국어
Edit links
This page was last edited on 29 October 2017, at 18:57.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: href class title

values:
/wiki/Employment_law
mw-redirect
Employment law

value: b

values:
/wiki/Civil_rights
mw-redirect
Civil rights

value: p

values: Employment discrimination law in the United States

values: float: right; clear: right; margin: 0.5em 0 0.8em 1.4em; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa; font-size: 88%; background-color: #F9F9F9; position: relative; text-align: left;

values:
/wiki/Airline_pilot
mw-redirect
Airline pilot

values:
/wiki/Religious_school
mw-redirect
Religious school

values:
/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Church
mw-redirect
Roman Catholic Church

values: wikisource:Wilson v. Southwest Airlines Co.

values: Employment discrimination law in the United Kingdom

values: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

values: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

values:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/20439087

values:
reflist mw-references-wrap
list-style-type: decimal;

values: Category:Anti-discrimination law in the United States

values: Category:Anti-discrimination law in Canada

values: Category:Anti-discrimination law in the United Kingdom

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values: 진정직업자격 – Korean

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Bona_fide_occupational_qualifications rootpage-Bona_fide_occupational_qualifications vector-experimental-print-styles vector-nav-directionality skin-vector action-view