text:
Elementary and Secondary Education Act
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965
Citations
Public law
Pub.L. 89–10
Statutes at Large
79 Stat. 27
Codification
Acts amended
Pub.L. 81–874, 64 Stat. 1100; Pub.L. 83–531, 68 Stat. 533
Titles amended
20 U.S.C.: Education
U.S.C. sections created
20 U.S.C. ch. 70
Legislative history
Introduced in the House as H.R. 2362
Signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson on April 11, 1965
Major amendments
Bilingual Education Act
Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974
Improving America's Schools Act of 1994
No Child Left Behind Act
Every Student Succeeds Act
Lyndon B. Johnson at the ESEA signing ceremony, with his childhood schoolteacher Ms. Kate Deadrich Loney
Education in the United States
By state and in insular areas
By subject area
History of
Issues: Finance – Law – Literacy – Reform
Levels: Pre-kindergarten – Primary – Secondary – Higher
Organizations
Education portal
United States portal
v
t
e
The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) was passed as a part of United States President Lyndon B. Johnson's "War on Poverty" and has been the most far-reaching federal legislation affecting education ever passed by the United States Congress. The act was an extensive statute that funded primary and secondary education.[1] It also emphasizes equal access to education and establishes high standards and accountability.[2]
In addition, the bill aimed to shorten the achievement gaps between students by providing each child with fair-equal opportunities to achieve an exceptional education. As mandated in the act, the funds are authorized for professional development, instructional materials, for resources to support educational programs, and for parental involvement promotion.
The act was originally authorized through 1965; however, the government has reauthorized the act every five years since its enactment. The reauthorization of ESEA by President George W. Bush was known as the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. ESEA was reauthorized on December 10, 2015 as the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) by President Barack Obama.[3]
Contents
[hide]
1 Historical context
2 Sections of the original 1965 Act
2.1 Title I
2.1.1 Overview
2.1.2 Historical context
2.1.2.1 Changes over time
2.1.2.2 First 15 years
2.1.2.3 The 1980s
2.1.2.4 From the 1990s to the present
2.1.3 Funding
2.1.3.1 Basic Grant
2.1.3.2 Concentration Grant
2.1.3.3 Targeted Assistance Grant
2.1.3.4 Education Finance Incentive Grant
2.2 Title III
2.3 Title V
2.4 Title VII
3 Effects on bilingual education
4 Landmark court cases
5 Notable reauthorizations
6 See also
7 References
8 External links
Historical context[edit]
On January 25, 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson Congressional to improve education opportunities for America's children. Wary of popular fears regarding increased federal involvement in local schools, the Johnson administration advocated giving local districts great leeway to use the new funds, which were to be first distributed as grants to each state. Shortly thereafter, Carl D. Perkins (D-KY), the chair of the General Education Subcommittee of the House Committee on Education and Labor introduced H.R. 2362. With the Johnson administration's support, and after significant wrangling over the structure of the bill's funding formula committee, the full committee voted 23–8 to report it on March 2, 1965. Following a failed attempt to derail the bill by Representative Howard K. Smith (D-VA), the House passed H.R. 2362 on March 26, 1965 in a 263–153 roll-call vote.[4]
As the Senate prepared to consider the education bill, S. 370, Democratic leaders urged their colleagues to pass it without amendment, so as to avoid throwing it back to the House for reconsideration. S. 370 was assigned to the Senate Labor and Public Welfare Committee, which subsequently reported the bill to the Senate floor with unanimous support. During the Senate debates, several amendments were introduced, though none passed. The Senate passed the bill in a 73–18 vote on April 7, 1965.[4]
President Johnson signed the Elementary and Secondary Education Act into law two days later on April 9, 1965.[4]
Sections of the original 1965 Act[edit]
Title I – Financial Assistance To Local Educational Agencies For The Education Of Children Of Low-Income Families
Title II – School Library Resources, Textbooks, and other Instructional Materials
Title III – Supplementary Educational Centers and Services
Title IV – Educational Research And Training
Title V – Grants To Strengthen State Departments Of Education
Title VI – General Provisions
New Titles Created by Early Amendments to 1965 Law
2008 No Child Left Behind Blue Ribbon School Logo
1966 amendments (Public Law 89-750)
Title VI – Aid to Handicapped Children (1965 title VI becomes Title VII)[5]
1967 amendments (Public Law 90-247)
Title VII – Bilingual Education Programs (1966 title VII becomes Title VIII)
Title I[edit]
"Title I" redirects here. For other uses of "Title I", see Title I (disambiguation).
It has been suggested that this section be split out into another article titled Title I (education). (Discuss) (April 2018)
Overview[edit]
Title I ("Title One"), a provision of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act passed in 1965, is a program created by the U.S. Department of Education to distribute funding to schools and school districts with a high percentage of students from low-income families. Funding is distributed first to state educational agencies (SEAs) which then allocate funds to local educational agencies (LEA's) which in turn dispense funds to public schools in need.[6] Title I also helps children from families that have migrated to the United States and youth from intervention programs who are neglected or at risk of abuse. The act appropriates money for educational purposes for the next five fiscal years until it is reauthorized.[7] In addition, Title I appropriates money to the education system for prevention of dropouts and the improvement of schools; these appropriations are carried out for five fiscal years until reauthorization.[7][8]
According to the National Center for Education Statistics, to be an eligible Title I school, at least 40% of a school's students must be from low-income families who qualify under the United States Census's definition of low-income, according to the U.S. Department of Education.[6][9]
Title I mandates services both to eligible public school students and eligible private school students.[6] This is outlined in section 1120 of Title I, Part A of the ESEA as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). Title I states that it gives priority to schools that are in obvious need of funds, low-achieving schools, and schools that demonstrate a commitment to improving their education standards and test scores.
There are two types of assistance that can be provided by Title I funds.[6] The first is a “schoolwide program” in which schools can dispense resources in a flexible manner.[10] The second is a “targeted assistance program” which allows schools to identify students who are failing or at risk of failing.[6]
Assistance for school improvement includes government grants, allocations, and reallocations based on the school's willingness to commit to improving their standing in the educational system. Each educational institution requesting these grants must submit an application that describes how these funds will be used in restructuring their school for academic improvement.[8]
Schools receiving Title I funding are regulated by federal legislation. Most recently, this legislation includes the No Child Left Behind Act, which was passed in 2001.[6] In the 2006–2007 school year, Title I provided assistance to over 17 million students who range from kindergarten through twelfth grade.[6] The majority of the funds (60%) were given to students between kindergarten through fifth grade.[6] The next highest group that received funding were students in sixth through eighth grade (21%).[6] Finally, 16% of the funds went to students in high school with 3% provided to students in preschool.[6]
Historical context[edit]
In its original conception, Title I under the ESEA, was designed by President Lyndon B. Johnson to close the skill gap in reading, writing and mathematics between children from low-income households who attend urban or rural school systems and children from the middle-class who attend suburban school systems.[10] This federal law came about during President Johnson’s “War on Poverty” agenda.[7] Numerous studies have been conducted since the original authorization of the ESEA in 1965 that have shown that there is an inverse relationship between student achievement and school poverty.[7] Specifically, student achievement has been found to decrease as school poverty increases.[7] According to the United States Department of Education (USDOE), students from low-income households are “three times as likely to be low achievers if they attend high-poverty schools as compared to low-poverty schools.”[11] Within this context, Title I was conceived in order to compensate for the considerable educational deprivations associated with child poverty.[7]
Changes over time[edit]
First 15 years[edit]
In the years since 1965, Title I has changed considerably.[12] For the first 15 years, the program was reauthorized every three years with additional emphasis placed on how funds were to be allocated.[12] In the course of these reauthorizations, strict federal rules and regulations were created for the guarantee that funds would be allocated solely to students in need – specifically students eligible for services based on socioeconomic status and academic achievement.[12]
Regulations also included added attention to uniformity in regards to how resources were distributed to Title I and non-Title he schools and the role of parents in the revisions of the program.[12] In addition to more stringent rules, during these years, policy makers outlined punitive actions that could be taken for those who were out of compliance.[12] Attention was also placed upon the assurance that Title I funds would not serve as replacements for local funds; but rather they would serve as ancillary resources.[12] These federal regulations, which were focused on financial resources, influenced local Title I programs in many ways.[12] Pull-out programs were adopted by Title I schools in order to comply with the financial stipulations that were made in the initial reauthorizations.[12] These programs separated eligible students from ineligible ones to ensure that those who were in-need would benefit from the program.[12] By 1978, in response to the extensive criticism of pull-outs on the grounds that they were asynchronous with the instruction occurring in Template:Classrooms, another option for providing assistance to students was introduced, the school wide approach.[12] Schools with a student body in which the make-up had 100% or more low-income students could use Title I funds for the entire school’s improvement rather than for specific individuals.[12] Despite this amendment, local fund requirements prevented all eligible students from using the school wide approach.
The 1980s[edit]
During the Reagan Administration, Congress passed the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act (ECIA) in 1981 to reduce federal regulations of Title I.[13] This reflected the administration’s stance that resource control should be in the hands of states and local jurisdictions rather than at a federal level.[13] Despite the change outlined by the ECIA and the new designation of Title I as Chapter I, little was done to implement it and traditional Title I practices, like the use of pull-outs, continued.[12]
As the financial regulations became incorporated into practice, the conversation shifted around Title I to student achievement.[12] In 1988, the Hawkins-Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Act, re-focused Title I on cultivating school improvement and excellent programs.[12] The additions that were made through this legislation called for synchrony between Chapter I and classroom instruction, it raised the achievement standard for low-income students by emphasizing advanced skills instead of basic ones and increased parental involvement.[12] It also had two new provisions: program improvement and school wide projects.[14] Program improvements were modifications that would occur when students who received funding were not improving.[14] The school wide projects altered the requirement that local funds had to match school wide program funding by Title I, allowing a larger number of high need schools to implement school wide programming.[12][14]
From the 1990s to the present[edit]
A 1993 National Assessment noted shortcomings of the 1980s alterations to Title I.[12] These catalyzed the introduction of the 1994 Improving America’s Schools Act (IASA), which significantly revised the original ESEA.
This was the last major alteration prior to those made by No Child Left Behind. The IASA attempted to coordinate federal resources and policies with the pre-exisiting efforts at the state and local levels in order to improve instruction for all students. This reform made three major changes to Title I.[12] It added math and reading/language arts standards to be used to assess student progress and provide accountability.[12] It reduced the threshold for schools to implement school-wide programs from 75% poverty to 50% and gave schools a longer reign to use federal funding from multiple programs to dispense funds at a school wide level.[12] Lastly, the IASA gave more local control overall so that federal officials and states could waive federal requirements that interfered with school improvements.[12]
The most recent and significant alteration to the original Title I was made by its reauthorization under No Child Left Behind (NCLB).[15] In this reauthorization, NCLB required increased accountability from its schools both from the teachers and from the students.[15] Yearly standardized tests were mandated in order to measure how schools were performing against the achievement bars set by Title I.[15] Schools were also responsible for publishing annual report cards that detailed their student achievement data and demographics.[15] Schools were now held accountable not only by punitive measures that would be taken if schools fail to meet Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP), but also corrective actions were taken if states did not have an assessment system approved by Title I.[15] Under NCLB, Schools are also required to plan for “restructuring” if they fail to make AYP for three years after being identified for improvement.[15] More schools took corrective action under NCLB than under IASA.[15] NCLB also required teachers to be highly qualified if hired using Title I funding.[15]
Modern applications of the Title I money have been diverse. Recent uses include wide-scale purchasing of iPads and other Internet using devices as electronic textbooks for students in 1:1 initiatives. Along with this, students from low-income families often do not have adequate Internet access from home. Thus, various public money, including Title I funds, are being investigated for possible use to provide cellular Internet access for students to receive remediation or other instructional content from home. The purpose of 24/7 internet access from home is to close the gap between higher income families where remediation resources are generally more available through parents and additional services and low-income students where such resources are scarce. Educational Technology advocates have long cited 24/7 Internet access as a boon to the education and advancement of at-risk children.
Funding[edit]
Under NCLB, Title I funding is given to schools where at least 35% of the children in the school attendance area come from low-income families or to schools where 35% of the student population is low-income.[16] To determine the percentage of low-income families, school districts may select a poverty measure from among the following data sources: (1) the number of children ages 5–17 in poverty counted in the most recent census; (2) the number of children eligible for free and reduced price lunches under the National School Lunch Program; (3) the number of children in families receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families; (4) the number of children eligible to receive Medicaid assistance; or (5) a composite of these data sources. The district must use the same measure to rank all its school attendance areas. The funds are appropriated for the use of improving academic achievement for students in low-income households.[16]
Title I funding is received by more than 50% of all public schools.[16] NCLB also requires that for funding to be received, all districts and schools must meet adequate yearly progress goals for their student populations and specific demographic subgroups.[16] Non-Title I schools are schools that do not receive federal Title I funds.[16] Although school districts have some freedom in how Title I funding is distributed among schools within a district, Title I requires them to prioritize the highest-poverty schools.[16]
There are 4 distribution formulas under NCLB for Title I funding: Basic Grant, Concentration Grant, Targeted Assistance Grant, and the Education Finance Incentive Grant.[17] The Federal Education Budget Project details the requirements for each formula extensively.[17]
Basic Grant[edit]
The Basic Grant formula provides funding to school districts based on the number of poor children they serve.[17] To receive money through this grant, the school district must meet the requirement of having at least 10 poor children and 2% of its students in poverty.[17]
Concentration Grant[edit]
The Concentration Grant formula is similar to the basic grant formula because it gives funding to schools based on the number of poor children they serve.[17] To receive money through this grant, school districts must meet the requirement of having at least 15% of children in poverty or a total of 6,500 poor children.[17]
Targeted Assistance Grant[edit]
The Targeted Assistance Grant formula allocates more money for each child as the poverty rate in a district increases.[17] This means that school districts with more poverty get more money for each poor child than districts with low poverty.[17]
Education Finance Incentive Grant[edit]
The Education Finance Incentive Grant Formula has a two-pronged approach.[17] It is meant to reward schools that expend more state resources on public education and distribute funding in an equitable manner.[17] It is also meant to concentrate funds in districts with high poverty that inequitably distributes state and local education funding.[17] In states, funding is allocated to school districts in a way similar to the Targeted Assistance Grant formula but the weight of schools in districts with high poverty that inequitably distribute funding is doubled.[17]
Since 2001, Federal Title I funding has increased by 88%. In dollars, this has been a $7.7 billion increase.[17] These funds were distributed through the Targeted Assistance and Education Finance Incentive Grant formulas, which target funds to disadvantaged students most directly.[17]
Title III[edit]
Title III of ESEA originally provided matching grants for supplementary education centers (Political Education, Cross 2004).
Title III was the innovations component of ESEA. It was, for its time, the greatest federal investment in education innovation ever.[18] Its best innovations, after validation, became part of the National Diffusion Network.
Title V[edit]
This section of the original ESEA provided for strengthening state departments of education (Political Education, Cross 2004). The original Title V was amended to state the purposes of education reform efforts between local and state educational systems. Title V states that the government should endorse and support local education reforms that parallel reforms occurring at the state level. Parts of this section also state that the government should support innovative programs that help to improve an educational system. This includes support programs for libraries, scientific research leading to state and local educational agencies to put promising reforms into place, as well as for programs to improve teacher performance.[8]
Title V also provides government grants given to educational institutions appropriating money to gifted programs for students, foreign language developers, as well as physical education, the arts, and overall mental health care of children and students.[8]
Title VII[edit]
Added during the 1967 reauthorization of ESEA, Title VII introduced a program for bilingual education. It was championed by Texas Democrat Ralph Yarborough (Political Education, Cross 2004). It was originally created to aid Spanish-speaking students. However, in 1968 it transformed to the all-encompassing Bilingual Education Act (BEA). In its original form, the BEA was not explicit in mandating that all school districts provide bilingual education services—it left much room for interpretation by districts. The ruling in Lau v. Nichols provided some clarity—specific program goals were established, support centers for bilingual education were created, and what a “bilingual education program” should look like was defined. The courts upheld the language of the BEA as it declared a “bilingual education program” as one providing English instruction in unison with the native language. The idea was to push students to high academic achievement via a program encouraging them to learn English while maintaining the native language.[19] "It proposed to cultivate in this child his ancestral pride, to reinforce (not destroy) the language he natively speaks, to cultivate his inherent strengths, to give him the sense of personal idenfitication so essential to social maturation," summarizes Professor Cordasco of Montclair State College.[20]
In addition to programs for bilingual students, Title VII implemented plans to help Indian, Native Hawaiian, and Alaskan natives be provided opportunities for achieving academic equality.[8] In late 1967, Congress gave $7.5 million to school districts, scholars, and private research groups who proposed the best programs for improving bilingual education.[21] This section of the ESEA promotes the federal government working closely with local educational institutions to ensure that Indian, Hawaiian, and Alaskan students are being aided in getting the same educational experiences as all other students.[8] This is achieved through programs that keep cultural values intact and push students to strive for academic excellence.
It is worth noting that Title VII was replaced in the most recent reauthorization of the ESEA, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, and is now Title III “Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students.”
Effects on bilingual education[edit]
In 1980, President Jimmy Carter established the Department of Education which allowed for the Bilingual Education campaign to expand bilingual education programs.[22] In addition to Carter’s efforts, President Clinton also showed his support through the Improving America's Schools Act of 1994. The act dramatically increased funding for bilingual and immigrant education.[23] In 1998, the Linguistic Society of America showed its support for the BEA arguing that bilingual education was a basic human right; it believed that children should be educated in order to maintain their native language and cultural identity while acquiring the English language.[24]
In 2001 Texas authorized and encouraged school districts to adopt dual language immersion programs for elementary-aged students. It stipulated that instruction in each language should be split 50–50 in class.[25] More recently “The Civil Rights Project, a research center founded at Harvard University and located at UCLA since 2007 is calling on policymakers to develop a new vision for bilingual education. Gándara and Hopkins gather compelling evidence that shows English-only policies in the states that adopted these restrictions aren’t working[26] The project proposes a new attitude that embraces bilingualism: “It is time that the U.S. join the rest of the developed world in viewing bilingualism as an asset, not a deficit,” argues Gary Orfield, co-director of the project.[27]
A 2014 bill, the Native Language Immersion Student Achievement Act, "cites reports from the Bureau of Indian Affairs and educational institutions 'that use primarily Native American languages to deliver education' and 'have indicated that students from these schools have generally had high school graduation and college attendance rates above the norm for their peers.'"[28]
The biggest obstacle to the BEA and expansion of bilingual education programs is the English-only Movement. There is no official language in the U.S., although some states have declared English as their official language. Three states in particular, California, Arizona, and Massachusetts, have declared English as their official language. In 1998, California passed Proposition 227 with the help of sponsor, Ron Unz, essentially ending bilingual education programs in exchange for an English immersion model which values assimilation over multiculturalism. In 2000, Arizona passed the English for Children initiative backed, again, by Ron Unz which mirrored California’s Proposition 227 in replacing bilingual education programs with English immersion ones.
Many Americans question whether bilingual education programs or English immersion models are the best route to helping students acquire English. The question of whether public education should encourage the development of the native tongue or completely leave that up to the parent is a difficult one. Some point out that California’s Proposition 227 is failing the students for simply failing to address both the linguistic and cultural struggles that students face; in 2004, the test results for California public school students showed the achievement gap for English learners widening and the test scores of English learners to be declining across grade levels.[29] Scholar Stephen Krashen maintains that these three states who have taken the harshest anti-bilingual education policies have seen progress that is modest, at best.[30] In a report to the United States Government, an Arizona study shows that English language learners can take up to 13 years to attain fluency—most school programs only offer 3 years of participation in English-immersion or bilingual programs, putting the effectiveness of these programs into question.[31] In order to ease the worries and qualms that people had in the programs' effectiveness, the Obama Administration has recently proposed the implementation of an evaluation system that it would require states to use in order to judge the progress seen in English language learners in schools. This would potentially restore faith in the bilingual programs and hold schools more accountable to student achievement and progress. The question remains if states are properly equipped across the board to meet such high expectations.[32]
Landmark court cases[edit]
1972: Aspira of New York, Inc v. New York Board of Education
Court ruled in favor of Puerto Rican and other Hispanic students whose language and cultural needs weren’t being addressed. This triggered an increased development of bilingual programs in New York public schools.[22]
1973: Keyes v. Denver School District No. 1
Court ruled in favor of Keyes recognizing the right that Hispanic children had to go to desegregated schools and not be racially isolated. The ruling recognizes Latinos’ suffering from systemic educational inequities.[22]
1974: Lau v. Nichols
Court ruled in favor of Lau which guarantees students the right to a “meaningful education” regardless of language. This ruling ensures that districts will provide students with the same curriculum via initiatives such as bilingual programs and ESL classes. It also increased district accountability—schools with high numbers of English language learners must submit reports to the federal government to show they’re providing adequate support for these students.[33]
1974: Serna v. Portales
Court ruled in favor of Serna that Portales Municipal Schools must provide a bilingual curriculum to accommodate the non-English speaking students. Texas also commits to employ bilingual personnel in schools.[22]
1978: Rios v. Reed
Court ruled in favor of Rios that the Pastchogue-Medford School District’s bilingual program offered to students was essentially an English-only course. The ruling states that these students were denied an equal education since they weren’t instructed in Spanish extensively in elementary school.[22]
1981: Castañeda v. Pickard
Court ruled in favor of Castañeda that the school was racially segregating the Hispanic children in classes and not providing adequate bilingual programs to help them overcome English-language barriers. The decision established a clear evaluation system to hold bilingual programs accountable for providing equal educational opportunities (programs based on educational theory, implemented effectively, and proven to be successful in overcoming language barriers).
2009: Horne v. Flores
Court ruled in favor of Horne that the state should have the right to determine the requirements of its English Language Learner programs. This holds schools less accountable for producing fluent English-speakers.
Notable reauthorizations[edit]
Clinton's Improving America's Schools Act of 1994
Bush's No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
Obama's Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015
House Bill 610 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/610
See also[edit]
Federal Impact Aid
Little School of the 400
Native Language Immersion Student Achievement Act
School Improvement Grant
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Secretary Riley Reignites the Math Wars". hoover.org. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
Jump up ^ ESEA. "No Child Left Behind Act". www.k12.wa.us. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
Jump up ^ "Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) - U.S. Department of Education". www.ed.gov. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
^ Jump up to: a b c "The Elementary and Secondary Education Act" The Legislation, The Great Society Congress
Jump up ^ Beyer, Bonnie; Johnson, Eileen S. (1 June 2014). Special Programs and Services in Schools Creating Options, Meeting Needs, Revised, 2nd Edition (2nd ed.). Lancaster PA: DEStech Publications, Inc. p. 225. ISBN 978-1-60595-175-1. Retrieved 22 January 2015.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j "Fast Facts". Institute of Education Sciences. Retrieved 28 November 2011. |first1= missing |last1= in Authors list (help)
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Carmichael, Paul H. (1997). "Who Receives Federal Title I Assistance?: Examination of Program Funding by School Poverty Rate in New York State". Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 19 (4): 354–59. doi:10.3102/01623737019004354.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "The Elementary and Secondary Education Act (The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001)". www2.ed.gov. 6 December 2010. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
Jump up ^ "Title I, Part A Program". www.ed.gov. 5 October 2015. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
^ Jump up to: a b Farkas, George; Hall, L. Shane (2000). "Can Title I Attain Its Goal?". Brookings Papers on Education Policy: 59–123.
Jump up ^ U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) (June 1992). "National assessment of the Chapter 1 program: The interim report". Washington, DC.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u "Part I: Title I In Perspective". National School Boards Association. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b Kennedy, M.M; Birman, B.F.; Demaline, R.E. (1986). "The effectiveness of Chapter 1 services: National assessment of Chapter 1". U.S. Department of Education.
^ Jump up to: a b c "Chapter 1 Survey of the Hawkins-Stafford School Improvement Amendments. A Report Prepared for the Subcommittee on Elementary, Secondary, and Vocational Education of the Committee on Education and Labor. House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, Second Session. Committee Print". Superintendent of Documents. February 1990.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h "Executive Summary – Evaluation of Title I Accountability Systems and School Improvement Efforts (TASSIE): First-Year Findings (2004)". U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f "No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Requirements for Schools". Great Schools.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n "No Child Left Behind Act – Title I Distribution Formulas". New American Foundation. Retrieved 28 November 2011.
Jump up ^ "Answers - The Most Trusted Place for Answering Life's Questions". Answers.com. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
Jump up ^ "Bilingual Education Act." K12academics, 2004–2011
Jump up ^ Cordasco, F., "The Bilingual Education Act." The Phi Delta Kappan, 1969, Vol. 51, No. 2, p. 75
Jump up ^ Cannon, G., "Bilingual Problems and Developments in the United States." Modern Language Association, 1971, Vol. 86, No. 3, p. 453
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Cerda N. and Hernandez C., "History of Bilingual Education" Bilingual Education, 2006
Jump up ^ "Improving America's Schools Act." K12academics, 2004–2011
Jump up ^ "Bilingual Education is a Human and Civil Right." Rethinking Schools, 2002–2003
Jump up ^ "Recent State Policies/Activities: Bilingual/ESL." United States Education Commission of the States, 2011
Jump up ^ "Forbidden Language: English Learners and Restrictive Language Policies — The Civil Rights Project at UCLA". civilrightsproject.ucla.edu. Retrieved 28 March 2018.
Jump up ^ Wyer, Kathy. "The Civil Rights Project" (PDF). sudikoff.gseis.ucla.edu. Teachers College Press. Retrieved 29 May 2015.
Jump up ^ Johnson, Bridget (2014-01-17). "Bill Would Reward Schools That Teach All Curriculum in Native American Languages". The PJ Tatler. Retrieved 2014-02-27.
Jump up ^ Cerda N. and Hernandez C., "Legislation Timeline" Archived 2011-09-20 at the Wayback Machine. Bilingual Education, 2006
Jump up ^ Krashen, S., "How Well Are They Doing? The Impact of English Immersion for English Language Learners in California, Arizona, and Massachusetts." University of Southern California, 2006
Jump up ^ "Public Education: Meeting the Needs of Students with Limited English Proficiency." General Accounting Office Report to Congressional Requesters, 2001
Jump up ^ Zehr, M., "Ability to Evaluate ELL Programs Questioned." Education Week (02774232), Vol. 29, Issue 28, 7 Apr. 2010
Jump up ^ Sugarman, ["Equal Protection for Non-English-Speaking School Children: Lau v. Nichols."] California Law Review (0008-1221), 1974, vol. 62, issue 1, pp. 157–182
External links[edit]
Copy of the Original Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, (P.L. 89-10; 79 Stat. 27), Federal Education Policy History website.
Resource Page About Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, si.unm.edu
Title I, Part A Program
What is ESEA
"Title I". Education Week.
The Great Society Congress
[hide]
v
t
e
Lyndon B. Johnson
36th President of the United States (1963–1969)
37th Vice President of the United States (1961–1963)
U.S. Senator from Texas (1949–1961)
U.S. Representative for TX-10 (1937–1949)
Presidency
1963 inauguration
1965 inauguration
Great Society
Architectural Barriers Act
Child Nutrition Act
Civil Rights Act of 1964
Department of Housing and Urban Development
Department of Transportation
Economic Opportunity Act of 1964
Head Start Program
Job Corps
Elementary and Secondary Education Act
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Fair Housing Act of 1968
Food Stamp Act of 1964
Glassboro Summit
Gun Control Act of 1968
Higher Education Act of 1965
Upward Bound
TRIO
Teacher Corps
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965
Johnson Doctrine
Dominican Republic occupation
Medicare
Medicaid
Meritorious Service Medal
National Endowment for the Arts
National Endowment for the Humanities
Non-Discrimination in Federal contracts
Executive Order 11375
Older Americans Act
Operation CHAOS
Outer Space Treaty
Public Broadcasting Act of 1967
Vietnam War
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution
"Credibility gap"
VISTA
Voting Rights Act of 1965
War on Poverty
White House Conference on Civil Rights
White House preservation
State of the Union Address, 1966
1968
Cabinet
Judicial appointments
Supreme Court
controversies
Life
Early years and career
Operation Texas
Texas Broadcasting Company
Johnson Amendment
Bashir Ahmad
Legacy
Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum
Lyndon B. Johnson National Grassland
Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center
Lyndon Baines Johnson Day
Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs
Memorial Grove on the Potomac
U.S. Postage stamp
Books
Bibliography
Elections
United States House of Representatives special elections, 1937
United States House of Representatives elections, 1938
1940
1942
1944
1946
United States Senate special elections, 1941
United States Senate elections, 1948
1954
1960
Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1960
1964
1968
Democratic National Convention 1956
1960
1964
United States presidential election, 1960
1964
Popular culture
Lyndon B. Johnson in popular culture
Daisy advertisement
Johnson cult
The Years of Lyndon Johnson
Path to War, (2002 film)
All the Way (2012 play, 2016 film)
LBJ (2017 film)
Family
Claudia "Lady Bird" Taylor Johnson (wife)
Lynda Bird Johnson Robb (daughter)
Luci Baines Johnson (daughter)
Samuel Ealy Johnson Jr. (father)
Rebekah Baines Johnson (mother)
Sam Houston Johnson (brother)
Samuel Ealy Johnson, Sr. (grandfather)
Joseph Wilson Baines (grandfather)
George Washington Baines (great-grandfather)
Chuck Robb (son-in-law)
← John F. Kennedy
Richard Nixon →
Category
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act&oldid=841741755"
Categories:
1965 in law
89th United States Congress
Great Society programs
Public education in the United States
United States federal education legislation
1965 in education
Hidden categories:
CS1 errors: missing author or editor
Webarchive template wayback links
Articles to be split from April 2018
All articles to be split
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Add links
This page was last edited on 17 May 2018, at 19:12.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attrs: rel class href

values:
nofollow
external text
http://legislink.org/us/pl-89-10

value: span

values:
nofollow
external text
http://legislink.org/us/stat-79-27

values:
nofollow
external text
http://legislink.org/us/pl-81-874

values:
nofollow
external text
http://legislink.org/us/stat-64-1100

values:
nofollow
external text
http://legislink.org/us/pl-83-531

values:
nofollow
external text
http://legislink.org/us/stat-68-533

values: Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974

values: Category:Education in the United States by state

values: Category:Education in insular areas of the United States

values: Category:Education in the United States by subject

values: History of education in the United States

values: Category:Education finance in the United States

values: Secondary education in the United States

values: Category:Educational organizations based in the United States

values: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;border-top:#aaa 1px solid; border-bottom:#aaa 1px solid;

values: Template talk:Education in the U.S. (page does not exist)

values: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

values:
/wiki/United_States_President
mw-redirect
United States President

values:
/wiki/Achievement_gap
mw-redirect
Achievement gap

values: United States House Committee on Education and Labor

values: United States Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions

values: Edit section: Sections of the original 1965 Act

values:
/wiki/Title_I_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
Title I (disambiguation)

values: Title I (education) (page does not exist)

values: Talk:Elementary and Secondary Education Act

values:
plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-move
presentation

values: National Center for Education Statistics

values:
/wiki/U.S._Department_of_Education
mw-redirect
U.S. Department of Education

values: Template:Classrooms (page does not exist)

values: Edit section: From the 1990s to the present

values: Edit section: Education Finance Incentive Grant

values: Edit section: Effects on bilingual education

values: English for Children (Arizona Proposition 203, 2000)

values:
/wiki/No_Child_Left_Behind_Act_of_2001
mw-redirect
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001

values:
nofollow
http://www.k12.wa.us/esea/
external text

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.ed.gov/essa

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/20372531

values:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/stable/461110

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d01226.pdf

values: List of Vice Presidents of the United States

values: List of United States Senators from Texas

values: Second inauguration of Lyndon B. Johnson

values: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

values: United States Department of Transportation

values:
/wiki/Head_Start_Program
mw-redirect
Head Start Program

values:
/wiki/TRIO_(program)
mw-redirect
TRIO (program)

values: United States occupation of the Dominican Republic (1965–66)

values: Meritorious Service Medal (United States)

values: Committee for the Preservation of the White House

values: List of federal judges appointed by Lyndon B. Johnson

values: Lyndon B. Johnson Supreme Court candidates

values: Lyndon B. Johnson judicial appointment controversies

values: Lyndon Baines Johnson Library and Museum

values: Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park

values:
/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson_Space_Center
mw-redirect
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

values: Lyndon B. Johnson School of Public Affairs

values: Lyndon Baines Johnson Memorial Grove on the Potomac

values: Presidents of the United States on U.S. postage stamps

values:
/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson_bibliography
mw-redirect
Lyndon B. Johnson bibliography

values: United States House of Representatives elections, 1940

values: United States House of Representatives elections, 1942

values: United States House of Representatives elections, 1944

values: United States House of Representatives elections, 1946

values: United States Senate elections, 1960 and 1961

values: Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1960

values: Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1964

values: Democratic Party presidential primaries, 1968

values: United States presidential election, 1960

values: United States presidential election, 1964

values:
/wiki/Samuel_Ealy_Johnson,_Sr.
mw-redirect
Samuel Ealy Johnson, Sr.

attrs: alt src title width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

values: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

values: Category:Public education in the United States

values: Category:United States federal education legislation

values: Category:CS1 errors: missing author or editor

values: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

values: Category:Articles to be split from April 2018

values: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

values: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

values: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

values: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

values: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

values: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

values:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

values: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

values:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

values: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

values: Find background information on current events

values:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

values: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

values: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

values: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act rootpage-Elementary_and_Secondary_Education_Act skin-vector action-view


text:
Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
[hide]This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This article may be in need of reorganization to comply with Wikipedia's layout guidelines. Please help by editing the article to make improvements to the overall structure. (December 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
(Learn how and when to remove this template message)
"Chirpy Chirpy, Cheep Cheep"
Single by Lally Stott
from the album Chirpy Chirpy, Cheep Cheep[1]
B-side
"Henry James"
Released
1970
Recorded
1970
Songwriter(s)
Lally Stott
"Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep"
Single by Middle of the Road
B-side
"Rainin' and Painin'"
Released
1970
Songwriter(s)
Lally Stott
Middle of the Road singles chronology
"Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep"
(1970) "Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum"
(1971)
"Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep"
(1971) "Tweedle Dee, Tweedle Dum"
(1971)
"Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep"
Single by Mac and Katie Kissoon
Released
1971
Songwriter(s)
Lally Stott
Mac and Katie Kissoon singles chronology
"String Module Error: Match not found"
(String Module Error: Match not found) "Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep"
(1971) "I've Found my Freedom"
(1972)
' "Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep"
(1971) "I've Found my Freedom"
(1972)
"Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep" is a song recorded in 1970 by its composer Lally Stott,[2] and made popular later that year by Scottish band Middle of the Road for whom it was a UK number one chart hit.[3] That version is one of the fewer than fifty all-time singles to have sold in excess of 10 million physical copies worldwide.[4]
Contents
[hide]
1 Charts
2 History
3 Cover versions
4 References
Charts[edit]
Lally Stott version
Chart (1971)
Peak
position
US (Billboard Hot 100) 92
Middle of the Road version
Chart (1971)
Peak
position
United Kingdom (The Official Charts Company)[5] 1
Ireland (IRMA)[6] 1
Switzerland (Schweizer Hitparade)[7] 1
Netherlands (Dutch Top 40)[8] 2
Norway (VG-lista)[9] 1
Denmark (Tracklisten) 1
Austria (Ö3 Austria Top 40)[10] 2
Germany (Official German Charts)[11] 2
Italy (FIMI)[12] 14
Spain (AFYVE)[13] 2
France (SNEP)[14] 15
Belgium (VRT Top 30 Flanders)[15] 1
Australia (Kent Music Report)[16] 2
Mac and Katie Kissoon version
Chart (1971)
Peak
position
United Kingdom (The Official Charts Company) 41
US (Billboard Hot 100) 20
History[edit]
The original recording by its composer Lally Stott, was a hit in France (Top 15), a minor hit in Italy, Australia and in the United States. Stott's record company, Philips, was reluctant to release the song overseas, and apparently offered it to two other groups: Scottish folk-pop group Middle of the Road, who were working in Italy at the time, and Mac and Katie Kissoon. While it is unclear which group Stott offered his song to first, Mac and Katie Kissoon produced their cover version first. Middle of the Road's version then initially became a hit in Continental Europe only, but later grew in popularity in the United Kingdom, reportedly via DJ Tony Blackburn favoring this version over the previously-produced version by Mac and Katie Kissoon. However, Middle of the Road's version didn't even chart on the United States Billboard Hot 100, and nearly flopped in the UK also, because it followed the Kissoon's previously-produced version. Middle of the Road's version eventually reached #1 in the UK and stayed there for five weeks in June 1971, while the Kissoons' version only reached #41.[17] In the USA the Kissoon's version was a greater success, reaching #20 on the Billboard Hot 100, while Lally Stott's original version reached #92.
The song was dismissed by critics[who?] as bubblegum at the time, a view initially held by band leader Ken Andrews: "We were as disgusted with the thought of recording it as most people were at the thought of buying it. But at the end of the day, we liked it."[citation needed]
Cover versions[edit]
The song was featured on the Top of the Pops, Volume 18 album.
The song appears as a cover on a 1971 television show with Paula Koivuniemi[18] and as a cover on a 1973 live record by the Little Angels Children’s Folk Ballet of Korea.
Also in 1971, Irish singer Jackie Lee covered the song on her second album Jackie's Junior Choice.
It was later referenced in the Denim song "Middle of the Road" in 1992, and more recently covered by the novelty act Cartoons.
The song was also covered by the British band Lush in 1990, and released on the compilation album, Alvin Lives (In Leeds).
The song was also covered by music group 4 Ties in 1995 and released on the compilation album of the same title.[19][20][21][22]
A re-worked version of this song (with modified lyrics) titled "Get the Party On" was included on The Cheeky Girls album PartyTime in 2004.
The song was covered by Kylie Minogue in 2017 to the soundtrack for the movie Swinging Safari.
Language versions The song has been covered in many languages, including Catalan, Vietnamese, Khmer, Korean, Spanish and German. A Spanish language version was done by Middle of the Road[23] followed by another version by Dolores Vargas.[24] German versions were by Hajo[25] and Mickie Krause who performed a dance song to the same tune, "Reiss die Hütte ab" (Tear The Hut Down) (Apres Ski Hits 2003). Koivistolaiset sang Finnish language version with lyrics from Vexi Salmi.
References[edit]
Jump up ^ "Lally Stott - Chirpy Chirpy, Cheep Cheep (Vinyl, LP, Album) at Discogs". Discogs.com. 2016-09-29. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "Lally Stott — Free listening, videos, concerts, stats and photos at". Last.fm. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "Top of the Pops 2 - Where Are They Now?". BBC. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ Moore-Gilbert, Bart (11 March 2002). The Arts in the 1970s: Cultural Closure. Routledge. Retrieved 2012-05-30.
Jump up ^ [1]
Jump up ^ "Chart Track: Week 9, 1971". Irish Singles Chart.
Jump up ^ "Swisscharts.com – Middle Of The Road – Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep". Swiss Singles Chart.
Jump up ^ "Nederlandse Top 40 – Middle Of The Road" (in Dutch). Dutch Top 40.
Jump up ^ "Norwegiancharts.com – Middle Of The Road – Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep". VG-lista.
Jump up ^ "Austriancharts.at – Middle Of The Road – Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep" (in German). Ö3 Austria Top 40.
Jump up ^ "Offiziellecharts.de – Middle Of The Road – Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep". GfK Entertainment Charts.
Jump up ^ "I singoli più venduti del 1971". HitParadeItalia (in Italian). Creative Commons. Retrieved 1 June 2013.
Jump up ^ Salaverri, Fernando (September 1971). Sólo éxitos: año a año, 1959–2002 (1st ed.). Spain: Fundación Autor-SGAE. ISBN 84-8048-639-2.
Jump up ^ "Lescharts.com – Middle Of The Road – Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep" (in French). Les classement single. Retrieved 21 July 2013.
Jump up ^ "chirpy chirpy cheep cheep - middle of the road". VRT (in Dutch). Top30-2.radio2.be. Archived from the original on 9 April 2012. Retrieved 25 July 2013. Hoogste notering in de top 30 : 1
Jump up ^ Billboard. Books.google.com. p. 83. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ [2][dead link]
Jump up ^ "Paula Koivuniemi - Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep 1971". YouTube. 2013-04-27. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "4 Ties — Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep download Mp3, Listen Free Online". Mp3red.ru. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "4 Ties - Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep (File, MP3) at Discogs". Discogs.com. 2016-09-29. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ Karine Sanche (2015-01-31). "Propio records, biography discography, recent releases, news, featurings of eurodance company - The Eurodance Encyclopædia". Eurokdj.com. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "4 Ties - Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep". YouTube. 2011-08-02. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "Middle of the Road: ♫ Chirpy chirpy cheep cheep (in spanish) ♫". YouTube. 2011-01-29. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "Dolores Vargas - Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep (spanish cover)". YouTube. 2011-10-22. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Jump up ^ "Hajo Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep 1971". YouTube. 2013-08-05. Retrieved 2016-10-03.
Preceded by
"Knock Three Times" by Dawn UK number one single
(Middle of the Road version)
19 June 1971 (5 weeks) Succeeded by
"Get It On" by T Rex
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chirpy_Chirpy_Cheep_Cheep&oldid=810570255"
Categories:
1971 singles
UK Singles Chart number-one singles
Number-one singles in Australia
Number-one singles in Norway
Number-one singles in Switzerland
Irish Singles Chart number-one singles
Middle of the Road songs
Schlager songs
Hidden categories:
CS1 Italian-language sources (it)
CS1 Dutch-language sources (nl)
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from October 2016
Wikipedia articles needing reorganization from December 2011
Articles needing additional references from January 2012
All articles needing additional references
Articles with multiple maintenance issues
Use dmy dates from July 2012
Use British English from July 2012
Music infoboxes with Module:String errors
Singlechart usages for Irish
Singlechart usages for Swiss
Singlechart usages for Dutch40
Singlechart usages for Norway
Singlechart usages for Austria
Singlechart usages for Germany2
Singlechart usages for France
All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2014
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2014
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Suomi
Edit links
This page was last edited on 16 November 2017, at 02:34.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

key: html

type: local

value: div

attrs: id class

values: mw-page-base noprint

values: mw-head-base noprint

value: a

attrs: id class lang

values: firstHeading firstHeading en

values: siteSub noprint

values: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: img

attrs: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

value: td

attrs: class role tabindex

values: mw-collapsible-toggle button 0

value: b

attrs: class href

attrs: href title

value: i

value: small

values:
plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-style
presentation

values: Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Refimprove

values:
mw-collapsible
width:95%; margin: 0.2em 0;

values: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-multiple_issues compact-ambox

attrs: alt src width height data-file-width data-file-height

values: Lally Stott single cover Chirpy Chirpy Cheep Cheep.jpg

values: width: 33%; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; padding: .2em .1em .2em 0;

values: width: 33%; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; padding:.2em .1em;

values: width: 33%; text-align: center; vertical-align: top; padding: .2em 0 .2em .1em;

values: background: transparent; width: 100%; min-width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse;

values: width:33%; padding:.2em .1em .2em 0; text-align: center;

values: width:33%; padding:.2em .1em; text-align: center;

values: width:33%; padding:.2em 0 .2em .1em; text-align: center;

values:
/wiki/Singles_(music)
mw-redirect
Singles (music)

values:
col
headerSort
0
columnheader button
Sort ascending

values:
/wiki/The_Official_Charts_Company
mw-redirect
The Official Charts Company

values: Syndicat National de l'Édition Phonographique

values: The material near this tag possibly uses too-vague attribution or weasel words. (December 2014)

values: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch

values: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2014)

values:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

values:
/wiki/Top_of_the_Pops,_Volume_18
mw-redirect
Top of the Pops, Volume 18

values: Alvin Lives (In Leeds) (page does not exist)

values:
nofollow
external text
http://www.last.fm/music/Lally+Stott

values: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

values:
/wiki/List_of_number-one_singles_(UK)
mw-redirect
List of number-one singles (UK)

values:
/wiki/T.Rex_(band)
mw-redirect
T.Rex (band)

values: Category:UK Singles Chart number-one singles

values: Category:Number-one singles in Australia

values: Category:Number-one singles in Switzerland

values: Category:Irish Singles Chart number-one singles

values: Category:CS1 Italian-language sources (it)

values: Category:CS1 Dutch-language sources (nl)

values: Category:All articles with dead external links

values: Category:Articles with dead external links from October 2016

values: Category:Wikipedia articles needing reorganization from December 2011

values: Category:Articles needing additional references from January 2012

values: Category:All articles needing additional references

values: Category:Articles with multiple maintenance issues

values: Category:Use British English from July 2012

values: Category:Music infoboxes with Module:String errors

values: Category:Singlechart usages for Germany2

values: Category:All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases

values: Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2014

values: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

values: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from December 2014

values:
/wiki/Chirpy_Chirpy_Cheep_Cheep
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

values: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

values:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

values:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

values: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

values: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

values: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

values: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

values: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

values: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

values:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

values: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

values: Permanent link to this revision of the page

values: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

values: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

values:
uls-settings-trigger
Language settings
0
button
true

values:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

values: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Chirpy_Chirpy_Cheep_Cheep rootpage-Chirpy_Chirpy_Cheep_Cheep skin-vector action-view