S10 Table. Effect of the Panama Papers scandal on preferences: Panel estimates. (PNG) S11 Table. Heterogeneity of responses by socio-demographics and trust: “Government should try to make income more equal”. (PNG) S12 Table. Heterogeneity of responses by socio-demographics and trust: “Ordinary work- ing people do not get their fair share of the nation’s wealth”. (PNG) S13 Table. Effects on redistribution preferences by political affiliation: “Gvt. should try to make income more equal”. (PNG) S14 Table. Effects on redistribution preferences by political affiliation: “Government should redist. from the better to the worse off”. (PNG) S15 Table. Ordered probit estimates: Alternative treatment definitions—Exposure to information for 30mns and above. (PNG) S16 Table. Ordered probit estimates: Alternative treatment definitions—Exposure to information for 1 hour and above. (PNG) S17 Table. Ordered probit estimates: Alternative treatment definitions—Exposure to information for 2 hours and above. (PNG) S18 Table. Ordered probit estimates: Heterogeneity of responses with respect to technol- ogy (internet). (PNG) S19 Table. Falsification tests on preferences for redistribution: Main outcomes. (PNG) S20 Table. Falsification tests: Stated preferences for EU-related questions. (PNG) S21 Table. Test of joint significance for the statement—“Ordinary people do not get their fair share of people’s wealth” (BES data). (PNG) S22 Table. Ordered probit estimates: Alternative treated group—Placebo date—Before Panama Papers. (PNG) S23 Table. Ordered probit estimates: Alternative treated group—Placebo date—After Pan- ama Papers. (PNG) S24 Table. Trust in government (OLS): Dependent variable.