text:
Patent US4144226 - Polymeric acetal carboxylates - Google PatentsSearch Images Maps Play YouTube News Gmail Drive More »Sign inAdvanced Patent SearchPatentsEther and acetal carboxylates useful as detergent builders to replace sodium tripolyphosphate (STP) in detergent formulations are known to the art. According to the present invention, new and novel polymeric acetal carboxylates are provided which are stable under laundry use conditions, but depolymerize...http://www.google.com/patents/US4144226?utm_source=gb-gplus-sharePatent US4144226 - Polymeric acetal carboxylatesAdvanced Patent SearchPublication numberUS4144226 APublication typeGrantApplication numberUS 05/826,425Publication dateMar 13, 1979Filing dateAug 22, 1977Priority dateAug 22, 1977Publication number05826425, 826425, US 4144226 A, US 4144226A, US-A-4144226, US4144226 A, US4144226AInventorsMarvin M. Crutchfield, Victor D. Papanu, Craig B. WarrenOriginal AssigneeMonsanto CompanyExport CitationBiBTeX, EndNote, RefManPatent Citations (4), Non-Patent Citations (1), Referenced by (144), Classifications (27), Legal Events (1) External Links: USPTO, USPTO Assignment, EspacenetPolymeric acetal carboxylatesUS 4144226 AAbstract Ether and acetal carboxylates useful as detergent builders to replace sodium tripolyphosphate (STP) in detergent formulations are known to the art. According to the present invention, new and novel polymeric acetal carboxylates are provided which are stable under laundry use conditions, but depolymerize in acid media, making the polymer fragments more readily biodegradable in waste streams.
Patent CitationsCited PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS3704320 *Jun 30, 1971Nov 28, 1972Monsanto CoDetergent formulationsUS3706672 *Dec 8, 1970Dec 19, 1972Celanese CorpDetergent polyelectrolyte buildersUS3725290 *May 12, 1972Apr 3, 1973Stepan Chemical CoOxyacetic acid compounds as builders for detergent compositionsUS3781349 *Feb 25, 1971Dec 25, 1973American Cyanamid CoPreparation of polyglycolic acid in finely divided form* Cited by examinerNon-Patent CitationsReference1 *Achmatowicz et al., "The Reaction of Esters of Mesoxalic Acid and Glyoxylic Acid with Furan", Roczniki Chemii Ann. Soc. Chim. Polonorum 42, 453 & 456 (1968).* Cited by examinerReferenced byCiting PatentFiling datePublication dateApplicantTitleUS4204052 *Nov 20, 1978May 20, 1980Monsanto CompanyCopolymers of acetal carboxylatesUS4224420 *Jun 18, 1979Sep 23, 1980Monsanto CompanyPreparation of polymeric acetal carboxylates using molecular sievesUS4225685 *Jun 18, 1979Sep 30, 1980Monsanto CompanyPreparation of polymeric acetal carboxylates using organoaluminum compoundsUS4226959 *Oct 22, 1979Oct 7, 1980Monsanto CompanyProcess for the preparation of polymeric acetal carboxylatesUS4226960 *Oct 22, 1979Oct 7, 1980Monsanto CompanyProcess for the preparation of polymeric acetal carboxylatesUS4233422 *Sep 24, 1979Nov 11, 1980Monsanto CompanyProcess for stabilizing acetal carboxylate polymers using dialkyl sulfateUS4233423 *Nov 5, 1979Nov 11, 1980Monsanto CompanyStabilization of polymeric acetal carboxylates using an acetalUS4284524 *Jun 30, 1980Aug 18, 1981The Procter & Gamble CompanyAlkaline dishwasher detergentUS4302564 *Jun 5, 1980Nov 24, 1981Monsanto CompanySelectively controlling the hydrolytic stability of acetal carboxylate polymersUS4303777 *Jun 5, 1980Dec 1, 1981Monsanto CompanyAcetal carboxylic acid polymersUS4327189 *Jun 5, 1980Apr 27, 1982Monsanto CompanyReversible deflocculation of clay slurriesUS4419258 *Sep 30, 1982Dec 6, 1983Monsanto CompanyDialkyl glyoxylate surfactantsUS4525541 *Jun 22, 1983Jun 25, 1985Nippon Zeon Co. Ltd.Method for modifying rubbersUS4530774 *Nov 30, 1983Jul 23, 1985Lever Brothers CompanyFabric washing process and detergent composition for use thereinUS4542206 *Jul 2, 1984Sep 17, 1985Monsanto CompanyProcess for preparing polymeric acetal carboxylate compositionsUS4568477 *Dec 5, 1984Feb 4, 1986Lever Brothers CompanyDetergent bleach compositionsUS4587033 *Jul 2, 1984May 6, 1986Monsanto CompanyPolymeric acetal carboxylate compositionsUS4605506 *Jun 1, 1984Aug 12, 1986Colgate-Palmolive CompanyFabric softening built detergent compositionUS4627931 *Jan 29, 1985Dec 9, 1986A. E. Staley Manufacturing CompanyMethod and compositions for hard surface cleaningUS4655954 *Aug 20, 1985Apr 7, 1987Colgate-Palmolive CompanyLow phosphate or phosphate free nonaqueous liquid nonionic laundry detergent composition and method of useUS4657693 *Dec 23, 1985Apr 14, 1987The Procter & Gamble CompanySpray-dried granular detergent compositions containing tripolyphosphate detergent builder, polyethylene glycol and polyacrylateUS4720399 *Jun 1, 1984Jan 19, 1988Colgate-Palmolive CompanyProcess for manufacture of particulate built nonionic synthetic organic detergent composition comprising polyacetal carboxylate and carbonate and bicarbonate buildersUS4800037 *Jun 5, 1987Jan 24, 1989Lever Brothers CompanyProcess for making a heavy duty liquid detergent compositionUS4820385 *Feb 18, 1988Apr 11, 1989Monsanto CompanyPurification of alkyl glyoxylate in a continuous column by azeotropic distillationUS4839407 *Feb 8, 1988Jun 13, 1989Monsanto CompanyParticulate polyacetal carboxylate and methods for preparation thereofUS4847005 *Oct 22, 1987Jul 11, 1989Monsanto CompanySolutions of hydrolytically stable polymeric acetal carboxylate salts and stable liquid detergent compositions containing such saltsUS4853259 *Jan 11, 1988Aug 1, 1989Colgate-Palmolive CompanyProcess for manufacturing particulate built nonionic synthetic organic detergent composition comprising polyacetal carboxylate and carbonate and bicarbonate buildersUS4867849 *Jul 25, 1988Sep 19, 1989Cova Dario RPurification of alkyl glyoxylateUS4889644 *Jun 15, 1988Dec 26, 1989Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienMachine washing process: detergent paste and automatic dispenserUS4900864 *Aug 9, 1988Feb 13, 1990Anantaneni Prakasa RManufacture of alkyl glyoxylates with ferric phosphate catalystUS4919845 *Jul 7, 1989Apr 24, 1990Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienPhosphate-free detergent having a reduced tendency towards incrustationUS5149455 *Jan 18, 1991Sep 22, 1992Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienProcess for increasing the density of spray dried, phosphate-reduced detergentsUS5330675 *Dec 10, 1992Jul 19, 1994Basf AktiengesellschaftUse of polyacetals based on vinyl ethers and dihydroxy compounds in detergents and cleaners and polyacetalsUS5374369 *Oct 14, 1993Dec 20, 1994Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc.Silver anti-tarnishing detergent compositionUS5464558 *Jan 4, 1995Nov 7, 1995Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc.Polymers and detergent compositions containing themUS5466802 *Nov 10, 1993Nov 14, 1995The Procter & Gamble CompanyDetergent compositions which provide dye transfer inhibition benefitsUS5468410 *Sep 8, 1994Nov 21, 1995Angevaare; Petrus A.Purine class compounds in detergent compositionsUS5470509 *Sep 26, 1994Nov 28, 1995The Procter & Gamble CompanyLow pH granular detergent composition having improved biodegradability and cleaning performanceUS5480576 *Sep 7, 1994Jan 2, 1996Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc.1,3-N azole containing detergent compositionsUS5501810 *Mar 31, 1993Mar 26, 1996Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienProcess for increasing the apparent density of spray-dried detergentsUS5537759 *Feb 4, 1993Jul 23, 1996Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienProcess for drying useful materials for detergents and cleaning products using superheated steamUS5587104 *Dec 10, 1991Dec 24, 1996Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienReadily soluble dry concentrates containing ingredients of detergentsUS5591707 *Oct 4, 1993Jan 7, 1997Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienProcess for producing free-flowing granules with superheated steamUS5783540 *Dec 23, 1996Jul 21, 1998Lever Brothers Company, Division Of Conopco, Inc.Machine dishwashing tablets delivering a rinse aid benefitUS5834414 *Oct 17, 1996Nov 10, 1998Ecolab Inc.Detergent composition having improved chlorine stability characteristics, novel chlorine containing product format and method of making chlorine stable compositionUS5850086 *Jun 21, 1996Dec 15, 1998Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaIron complexes for bleach activation and stereospecific oxidationUS5856288 *Apr 21, 1997Jan 5, 1999Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.Polyalkylene glycol-polyglyoxylate block copolymer, its production process and useUS5858117 *Aug 31, 1994Jan 12, 1999Ecolab Inc.Proteolytic enzyme cleanerUS5861366 *May 21, 1996Jan 19, 1999Ecolab Inc.Proteolytic enzyme cleanerUS5929014 *Sep 19, 1994Jul 27, 1999Henkel-Ecolab Gmbh & Co. OhgPaste-form detergentUS5969171 *Jun 30, 1998Oct 19, 1999Clariant GmbhMetal complexes as bleach activatorsUS5972869 *Dec 17, 1996Oct 26, 1999Colgate-Palmolive CoMildly acidic laundry detergent composition providing improved protection of fine fabrics during washing and enhanced rinsing in hand washUS5998645 *May 1, 1998Dec 7, 1999Clariant GmbhBleaching-active metal complexesUS6031132 *Dec 15, 1998Feb 29, 2000Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.Amide-group-containing polyacetal and its production process and useUS6040288 *Feb 20, 1998Mar 21, 2000Rhodia Inc.Fabric color protection compositions and methodsUS6096704 *Mar 21, 1997Aug 1, 2000Bryant, Jr.; Lonnie LiddellPro-fragrance compoundUS6107528 *Dec 2, 1998Aug 22, 2000Regents Of The University Of MinnesotaIron complexes for bleach activation and stereospecific oxidationUS6140292 *Dec 9, 1997Oct 31, 2000The Procter & Gamble CompanyLaundry detergent compositions with polyamide-polyaminesUS6156722 *Dec 9, 1997Dec 5, 2000The Procter & Gamble CompanyLaundry detergent compositions comprising dye fixativesUS6187739Sep 13, 1996Feb 13, 2001Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienPaste-form washing and cleaning agentsUS6197739Aug 19, 1997Mar 6, 2001Ecolab Inc.Proteolytic enzyme cleanerUS6248708Aug 28, 1997Jun 19, 2001Henkel-Ecolab Gmbh & Co. OhgPaste-form detergent containing a mixture of ethoxylated alcoholsUS6262013Oct 15, 1999Jul 17, 2001Ecolab Inc.Sanitizing laundry sourUS6290732Nov 9, 1999Sep 18, 2001Ecolab Inc.Laundry process with enhanced ink soil removalUS6329333Jan 21, 1998Dec 11, 2001Henkel-Ecolab Gmbh & Co. OhgPastelike detergent and cleaning agentUS6365562Apr 20, 2001Apr 2, 2002Clariant GmbhLaundry detergents and cleaners comprising bleaching-active dendrimer ligands and metal complexes thereofUS6537959May 8, 2001Mar 25, 2003Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa, Division Of Conopco, Inc.Bleach catalyst and composition and method for bleaching a substrateUS6545147Sep 8, 2000Apr 8, 2003Clariant GmbhBleaching-active metal complexesUS6576714Feb 22, 2001Jun 10, 2003Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.Production process for glyoxylic acid (salt)-based polymerUS6617300Aug 30, 2001Sep 9, 2003Procter & Gamble CompanyGranular bleach activators having improved solubility profilesUS6627592Dec 4, 1999Sep 30, 2003Ecolab Gmbh & Co. OhgPasty washing agentUS6660711Jul 13, 2000Dec 9, 2003The Procter & Gamble CompanyLaundry detergent compositions comprising zwitterionic polyamines and mid-chain branched surfactantsUS6769200Apr 24, 2001Aug 3, 2004Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf AktienDevice for spray-drying solvent-containing compositionsUS6790814Nov 27, 2000Sep 14, 2004Procter & Gamble CompanyDelivery system having encapsulated porous carrier loaded with additives, particularly detergent additives such as perfumesUS6866687Sep 25, 2003Mar 15, 2005Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa, A Division Of Conopco, Inc.Composition and method for bleaching a substrateUS6949498May 27, 2003Sep 27, 2005Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa A Division Of Conopco, Inc.Laundry cleansing and conditioning compositionsUS6953587May 29, 2003Oct 11, 2005Proacter & Gamble CompanyProcess for making a water-soluble foam componentUS7012054Dec 3, 2003Mar 14, 2006Unilever Home & Personal Care Usa, Division Of Conopco, Inc.Softening laundry detergentUS7015185Mar 12, 2003Mar 21, 2006Clariant GmbhAmmonium nitriles and the use thereof as hydrophobic bleaching activatorsUS7524800Jun 12, 2008Apr 28, 2009Rhodia Inc.Mono-, di- and polyol phosphate esters in personal care formulationsUS7524808Jun 12, 2008Apr 28, 2009Rhodia Inc.Hard surface cleaning composition with hydrophilizing agent and method for cleaning hard surfacesUS7550419Jun 12, 2008Jun 23, 2009Rhodia Inc.Mono-, di- and polyol alkoxylate phosphate esters in oral care formulations and methods for using sameUS7557072Jun 12, 2008Jul 7, 2009Rhodia Inc.Detergent composition with hydrophilizing soil-release agent and methods for using sameUS7608571Jun 12, 2008Oct 27, 2009Rhodia Inc.Method for recovering crude oil from a subterranean formation utilizing a polyphosphate esterUS7638475Mar 21, 2007Dec 29, 2009Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LpSpace saving toilet cleaning systemUS7682403Jan 9, 2004Mar 23, 2010Ecolab Inc.Method for treating laundryUS7732396Dec 22, 2004Jun 8, 2010Kao CorporationProcess for producing a granular anionic surfactantUS7790664Oct 27, 2008Sep 7, 2010The Procter & Gamble CompanyMethods for making a nil-phosphate liquid automatic dishwashing compositionUS7867963Jan 6, 2009Jan 11, 2011Rhodia Inc.Mono-, di- and polyol phosphate esters in personal care formulationsUS7919073May 25, 2009Apr 5, 2011Rhodia OperationsMono-, di- and polyol alkoxylate phosphate esters in oral care formulations and methods for using sameUS7919449May 25, 2009Apr 5, 2011Rhodia OperationsDetergent composition with hydrophilizing soil-release agent and methods for using sameUS8263543Apr 1, 2010Sep 11, 2012The Procter & Gamble CompanyFabric care compositions comprising organosiloxane polymersUS8268765Nov 30, 2010Sep 18, 2012Rhodia OperationsMono-, di- and polyol phosphate esters in personal care formulationsUS8293699Jan 6, 2009Oct 23, 2012Rhodia OperationsHard surface cleaning composition with hydrophilizing agent and method for cleaning hard surfacesUS8299010Sep 10, 2010Oct 30, 2012The Procter & Gamble CompanyLaundry care compositions with thiazolium dyeUS8361946Apr 7, 2005Jan 29, 2013Akzo Nobel N.V.Detergent compositionUS8394752Dec 9, 2009Mar 12, 2013The Procter & Gamble CompanyPearlescent agent slurry for liquid treatment compositionUS8426635Mar 4, 2009Apr 23, 2013Clariant Finance (Bvi) LimitedProcess for preparing solid alkaline earth metal salts of secondary paraffinsulphonic acidsDE102007028310A1Jun 20, 2007Dec 24, 2008Clariant International Ltd.Tensidmischungen mit synergistischen EigenschaftenDE102008013606A1Mar 11, 2008Sep 17, 2009Clariant International Ltd.Verfahren zur Herstellung fester Erdalkalimetallsalze sekund�rer Paraffinsulfons�urenEP0043166A1 *Jun 24, 1981Jan 6, 1982THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYAlkaline dishwasher detergentEP0150532A1Dec 12, 1984Aug 7, 1985THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYPeroxygen bleach activators and bleaching compositionsEP0216741A2 *Aug 26, 1986Apr 1, 1987Monsanto CompanyProcess for preparing polymeric acetal carboxylatesEP0679714A2Apr 25, 1995Nov 2, 1995THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYDetergent compositions containing cellulase enzyme and selected perfumes for improved odor and stabilityEP0693549A1Jul 19, 1994Jan 24, 1996THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYSolid bleach activator compositionsEP0748864A1Dec 18, 1995Dec 18, 1996THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYCleaning composition and method for the cleaning of delicate surfacesEP0753571A1Jul 10, 1995Jan 15, 1997THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYProcess for making granular detergent compositionEP0771785A1Nov 2, 1995May 7, 1997THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYBeta-amino ester compounds of perfume alcohols and their use in cleaning or laundry compositionsEP0778339A2Dec 3, 1996Jun 11, 1997Basf CorporationImproved non-phosphate machine dishwashing compositions containing polycarboxylate polymers and nonionic graft copolymers of vinyl acetate and polyalkylene oxideEP0778340A2Dec 3, 1996Jun 11, 1997Basf CorporationImproved non-phosphate machine dishwashing compositions containing copolymers of alkylene oxide adducts of allyl alcohol and acrylic acidEP0778342A1Dec 6, 1995Jun 11, 1997THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANYDetergent compositionsEP0790244A1Feb 6, 1997Aug 20, 1997Hoechst AktiengesellschaftAmmonium nitriles and use thereof as bleach activatorsEP0962475A1 *Dec 15, 1998Dec 8, 1999Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd.Amidated polyacetals, process for producing the same, and use thereofEP1854869A1May 9, 2006Nov 14, 2007The Procter and Gamble CompanyWater-soluble, liquid-containing pouchEP1975225A1Feb 25, 2008Oct 1, 2008The Procter and Gamble CompanyDetergent compositionEP2169042A1Sep 30, 2008Mar 31, 2010The Procter and Gamble CompanyComposition comprising microcapsulesEP2426192A1Mar 20, 2007Mar 7, 2012The Procter and Gamble CompanyLiquid treatment compositionWO1990001533A1Jul 25, 1989Feb 22, 1990Henkel KgaaProcess for dosing washing agents in paste formWO1996025478A1Feb 6, 1996Aug 22, 1996Gerard Marcel BaillelyDetergent composition comprising an amylase enzyme and a nonionic polysaccharide etherWO1997042282A1May 3, 1996Nov 13, 1997Ayako MuramatsuDetergent compositions comprising polyamine polymers with improved soil dispersancyWO2001021499A1Sep 22, 1999Mar 29, 2001Citra Wijaya NgA hand-held liquid containerWO2004069979A2Jan 23, 2004Aug 19, 2004Unilever PlcLaundry cleansing and conditioning compositionsWO2007120547A1Apr 5, 2007Oct 25, 2007Karel Jozef Maria DepootLiquid laundry detergents containing cationic hydroxyethyl cellulose polymerWO2008109384A2Feb 29, 2008Sep 12, 2008Celanese Acetate LlcMethod of making a bale of cellulose acetate towWO2008110205A1Mar 12, 2007Sep 18, 2008Peter BeisemannMembrane-friendly pasty soap composition with enhanced defoaming propertiesWO2010080326A1Dec 10, 2009Jul 15, 2010The Procter & Gamble CompanyPearlescent agent slurry for liquid treatment compositionWO2011100405A1Feb 10, 2011Aug 18, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyBenefit compositions comprising crosslinked polyglycerol estersWO2011100411A1Feb 10, 2011Aug 18, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyBenefit compositions comprising polyglycerol estersWO2011100420A1Feb 10, 2011Aug 18, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyBenefit compositions comprising crosslinked polyglycerol estersWO2011100500A1Feb 11, 2011Aug 18, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyBenefit compositions comprising polyglycerol estersWO2011100667A1Feb 14, 2011Aug 18, 2011Ls9, Inc.Surfactant and cleaning compositions comprising microbially produced branched fatty alcoholsWO2011123727A2Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyOrganosiliconesWO2011123732A1Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyComposition comprising modified organosiliconesWO2011123734A1Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyCare polymersWO2011123736A1Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyCare polymersWO2011123737A1Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyCare polymersWO2011123739A1Apr 1, 2011Oct 6, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyCompositions comprising organosiliconesWO2011143321A1May 11, 2011Nov 17, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyCare polymersWO2011143322A1May 11, 2011Nov 17, 2011The Procter & Gamble CompanyFabric and home care product comprising care polymersWO2012040130A1Sep 20, 2011Mar 29, 2012The Procter & Gamble CompanyNon-fluoropolymer surface protection compositionWO2012040131A2Sep 20, 2011Mar 29, 2012The Procter & Gamble CompanyFabric care formulations and methodsWO2012040171A1Sep 20, 2011Mar 29, 2012The Procter & Gamble CompanyNon-fluoropolymer surface protection compositionWO2013068479A1Nov 8, 2012May 16, 2013Basf SeSelf-emulsifiable polyolefine compositionsWO2013071036A1Nov 9, 2012May 16, 2013The Procter & Gamble CompanyEmulsions containing polymeric cationic emulsifiers, substance and process* Cited by examinerClassifications U.S. Classification525/401, 528/232, 560/180, 510/235, 510/479, 562/587, 510/361, 528/250, 562/583, 549/427, 510/230, 528/243, 510/533, 549/420International ClassificationC11D3/00, C08G2/18, C08G2/30, C08G2/14, C11D3/37Cooperative ClassificationC08G2/18, C08G2/14, C08G2/30, C11D3/3711European ClassificationC08G2/18, C08G2/30, C08G2/14, C11D3/37B3Legal EventsDateCodeEventDescriptionNov 28, 1997ASAssignmentOwner name: SOLUTIA INC., MISSOURIFree format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:MONSANTO COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:008820/0846Effective date: 19970824RotateOriginal ImageGoogle Home - Sitemap - USPTO Bulk Downloads - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - About Google Patents - Send FeedbackData provided by IFI CLAIMS Patent Services©2012 Google


text:
Showing 251-275 of 328 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on May 5, 2012 12:01:17 AM PDT
ClaytonI think you are much clearer than the Nicene Creed. Where were you when the bishops needed you?
No In reply to an earlier post on May 5, 2012 11:39:43 AM PDT
Michael,I hope you are okay and doing well despite the issues you are having with utilities. I've always enjoyed engaging with you and arguing with you.
No In reply to an earlier post on May 5, 2012 12:58:11 PM PDT
reply to Clayton A. Miller's post:there is one GodJesus is not God is not Jesusthey are separate and distinct entitiesthis one in 3 or 3 in 1 makes no sense There are 3 entities in the Godsquad.God is the head guy. Jesus is nr 2. Jesus obeys God. Jesus does not know what God knows per the bible.You cant make them the same and get anyone to believe it's true.
No In reply to an earlier post on May 5, 2012 11:22:16 PM PDT
WD said: "I have read your comment and have also read Nash's discussion of theotes and theiotes. Some claim theotes is "divine" and "theiotes" is "divine quality". I think this argument may not be settled."I've not heard this, but the word, 'divine' is an adjective, isn't it? It is a description of a quality. I guess it boils down to divine quality or divine attributes - in other words, it's the difference between divine nature and divine personality.I tend to think that theiotes - derived from theion, is related to the God's attribute of power, as displayed, for example, in the destructive force of brimstone, which, in Greek, is theion. Bible translations favor the use of the word,'divinity' at Romans 1:20, where theiotes is used, while 'deity' is preferred at Col 2:9Nash concluded that the two words were used pretty much interchangably and saw no significant distinction between them in actual usage.But what we don't see is any usage where either word refers to a god-being comprised of multiple persons into a single entity. This a popular perception today, but it is not supported by any usage in ancient documents. It's mostly an invented definition
No In reply to an earlier post on May 5, 2012 11:33:01 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on May 5, 2012 11:35:04 PM PDT
DTS -Thank you.Yeah, I bought a 23 year-old manufactured home that was abused and neglected, and I'm renovating it to make it habitable. It was rather dreadful. It's now sitting on 2 1/2 acres with a wonderful view of our 12, 633 ft tall mountain, and I haven't gotten the utilities hooked up yet, focusing first on the interior living areas. I'm doing everything out of pocket, and, the pockets have been pretty empty lately. It will all be worth it when it's done - and very inexpensive to live in.Unfortunately, I've not had much opportunity to argue with anyone since December. I hope to get back to it soon. Thanks.
No In reply to an earlier post on May 5, 2012 11:40:40 PM PDT
Nice! Arizona is beautiful around those parts.
No In reply to an earlier post on May 7, 2012 4:34:28 PM PDT
Harold Swanson,You have a problem with the Christian concept of a Divine Trinity who are one in essence, nature, and being.Well, so do I. However, i see the problem not of being an acceptance of a single god or multiple gods, butof how the One God is revealed to mankind.Since the 4th Century, the Godhead has been defined as "One God expressed to Mankind as Three Persons".But this is not necessarily a good definition of the Godhead, for a simple reason: This Tripartite God containsan extraneous element: The Human Being, Jesus of Nazareth. Additionally, the ENTIRE Godhead supposedly dwells within the physical body of Jesus of Nazareth.Logically, my last sentence is a circular argument.IF Jesus of Nazareth is a member of the Godhead, and is the Human Being in whom the ENTIRE Godhead dwells, fromEternity, then Jesus of Nazareth dwells in himself as himself, thus being not only Human, but also Spirit, and is himself his ownsource. As far as I know, there is only ONE Source, the Father [the Godhead in His entirety].But WHAT is "spirit"? How do we define it?Some define "spirit" as "a shapeless form" [I know that makes no sense to you, since it makes no sense to me, either.]The two words are contradictory, and such a statement has no basis in Logic, since something which is shapeless has no form,and no form is shapeless. Therefore, such a definition is empty of content, and means nothing.Some define "spirit" as a "Personal Being" without a body, who can appear in a body. This statement is at least logicallyconsistent. But is it true? Do such "spirits" exist? The first word off the top of my head to describe such a spiritual being wouldbe "Angel". Angels have almost ALWAYS been described as having human features [i.e., "bodies"] which are visible to those whoperceived them. So "Angel" is a prime candidate for being "Personal Spirit".A "human spirit" would never occur to me, since ALL human beings have a form -- our bodies, which we receive over a course ofnine months, and which we lose when we die and begin turning into dust. This form contains all which make up a human being.It contains a Brain, which is the seat of our intelligence, and the center of our Being. It contains Eyes, which are the organs enabling us to receive the reflections of Light from other forms in the Universe around us It contains Ears, which are the organs with which we receive the sounds of the Universe around us. It contains Skin, which is the organ of touch-perceptions, which is able to receive touch perception of other forms around us.It contains a Tongue, which is the organ of taste and speech. And finally, it contains a Nose, which is the organ of smell-perceptions. Without these physical organs, we are nothing more than meat on a plate.But we do have a "spirit". This "spirit" is our ability to think, will, communicate, understand, and act. In other words, our Conscious Intelligence. This "spirit" is not ourselves. It is found in our brains. When the brain dies, there is no more conscious intelligence.We, ourselves, are the combination of the Mind and Body. Without the body, we have no mind. And without our mind, ourbody has no ability to interact with other beings, including ourselves. We need both to properly be called a "Person". "We" are not "our minds", and "We" are not our "bodies". "We" are "our minds and bodies together".To me, the BEST definition of a"spirit" is "conscious awareness". Nothing more, and nothing less. Since we cannot "see" this,a ""spirit" is altogether invisible. However, we CAN "Understand" it. In this way only did Jesus mean that "God is Spirit". The ONLYway a man of flesh and blood can "see" God is through the "eyes of his understanding". The "Father" is the only "form" which describes"God" Himself. God is His own form. No more gods exist in His form. And His "form" is eternal, and never hada beginning, and will never have an end. ALL other "forms" derive their being from the "forms" which have always existed in the mindof the Father. One of these "Forms" is Mankind. Specifically, ONE "Man", who is the blueprint from which all other human beings wereformed. The original form of Man is now known to us as "Jesus of Nazareth". But He was originally a "form" in the mind of the Father,not a human being who can be touched or seen, until God Himself "realized" this form in the Original human beings, Adam and Eve, Inthis way, Jesus is First, as the form from which all other human beings derive their own form.Only in this way can we say that Jesus of Nazareth has eternally existed, as the Original Form from which all other forms were generated.Because the original form existed in the mind of God from eternity, can we say that this form is God Himself? I do not believe this ispossible, logically. If something is not logically possible, it has no existence in reality. It is just an "impossible concept".The form of man was a "form in God" -- a thought, a specific thought, in the Mind of God. But was this thought the ONLY thought God had?It is obviously not so, since we see many other "forms" around us. You know, like cats, chickens, dogs, food on the table, elements. None ofthese have our form, and since all which exists came forth from the Mind of God, He MUST have other forms within Himself. Humanity was ONE of the myriad of other forms in God's Eternal Mind. I believe there are other forms which we have not yet seen, but which we will one daysee. The only forms we know of are the forms which we can see. And we have seen very few, having lived on this small planet all our days.How do we know there are no other forms on other planets, around other stars? We don't.Now, we are told by Paul that Jesus is the "express image" of the Father. Does this mean that He IS the Father? No. It ONLY means that Heis the "express IMAGE" of the Father. So is God actually a HUGE human being? Does this Eternal, Infinite Being look like Jesus, only impossiblylarge? That is foolishness. If God IS Infinite, then He can have no "form", since "form" implies boundaries. If God is Infinite [which has no boundaries],then God has no form. He is His own "form".And does Jesus look like the Father? How could He "look" like the Father, since the Father is boundless, and has no skin forming His boundaries, being Infinite? Is Jesus just a "scaled-down" version of the Infinite and Eternal Father? That is a possibility, but is it true? Is it even possible to scale down"Infinity". Infinity is an indivisible amount. If an indivisible amount cannot be further divided ["scaled down"], it can only be what it is -- Infinity.If it is not possible to scale down Infinity, then in no way could Jesus be God, scaled down. So we conclude that Jesus is NOT "God, scaled down"Now, a smaller amount can be scaled up, by ADDING to the amount. So, Is God a scaled-up version of Jesus? If God is already fully and completely Infinite, how could He be scaled up any further? You cannot add to Infinity, neither can you divide infinity.We MUST conclude two things:1) God is not Jesus2) Jesus is not GodWhich only leaves one concept: Humanity does NOT, as a general rule, understand the Words of Jesus. No matter WHO they are or were, since almost NO Bible-believer refuses to call Jesus "God" in one way or another. Whether one calls Him "a God", or just "God". As Jesus puts it, Only the Father knows the Son, and only the Son knows the Father, and those he chooses to reveal Him to.Instead, they make the Eternal Creator out to be a MAN, and "changed the image of the Father into the image of a man...and served and worshiped the Creation rather than the Creator."ALL professing Christians who worship Jesus as God are IDOLATERS [and I mean EVERYONE who worships Jesus as God in ANY WAY]From Catholics to LDS. ALL have changed the image of the Invisible God into one of His creations.a sinner,Donald Lee McDaniel
No In reply to an earlier post on May 7, 2012 4:52:45 PM PDT
reply to Donald L. Mcdaniel's post:the bible clearly shows that Jesus is not God is not Jesusand that they are two separate and distinct entities
No In reply to an earlier post on May 16, 2012 10:56:50 PM PDT
Donald:I appreciate the attitude of your post. It's nice to have a civil discussion without the practice of name calling. Sorry about taking so long in getting back to you. Let me address a couple of your points just to get things rolling.You said: "Now, we are told by Paul that Jesus is the "express image" of the Father. Does this mean that He IS the Father? No. It ONLY means that He is the "express IMAGE" of the Father. So is God actually a HUGE human being? Does this Eternal, Infinite Being look like Jesus, only impossibly large? That is foolishness. If God IS Infinite, then He can have no "form", since "form" implies boundaries. If God is Infinite [which has no boundaries], then God has no form. He is His own "form". End QuoteI agree that Jesus Christ is in the express image of the Father, and that He is not the Father. I believe that the Father and Jesus Christ are two separate beings. Jesus Christ is Heavenly Father's Only Begotten Son, and again is in the express image of the Father. We look like Jesus, Adam, and Seth and they look like God the Father.26 �And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth. 27 So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them. (Genesis 1: 26-27).1 This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him; 2 Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created. 3 �And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth: (Genesis 5: 1-3)I do not understand why you asked the question: "So is God actually a HUGE human being? Does this Eternal, Infinite Being look like Jesus, only impossibly large?" End Quote. It seems that you are setting up a "straw man". Why would God the Father be a huge human being?You then reasoned: "If God IS Infinite, then He can have no "form", since "form" implies boundaries. If God is Infinite [which has no boundaries], then God has no form. He is His own "form". End QuoteYour logic here is questionable in my opinion because you misunderstand the use of the word "infinite". It does not refer to the size of God's body, but the eternalness of God. The physical resurrected Jesus Christ is infinite and will live forever. He is, however, the size of a man. He said to John: 17 And when I saw him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying unto me, Fear not; I am the first and the last: 18 I am he that liveth, and was dead; and, behold, I am alive for evermore, Amen; and have the keys of hell and of death. (Rev. 1: 17-18).Jesus Christ has a physical resurrected body of flesh and bones in heaven today. He is in the express image of the Father. He will never die a second physical death. 9 Knowing that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more; death hath no more dominion over him. 10 For in that he died, he died unto sin once: but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. (Romans 6: 9-10)52 And the graves were opened; and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, 53 And came out of the graves after his resurrection, and went into the holy city, and appeared unto many. (Matt. 27: 52-53).To call Christ or any other persons who were physically resurrected from the grave after Christ "Human" would not be a proper description of their new physical resurrected bodies.Paul said this about the resurrection:20 But now is Christ risen from the dead, and become the firstfruits of them that slept. 21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. 23 But every man in his own order: Christ the firstfruits; afterward they that are Christ's at his coming. (1 Cor. 15:20-23).A physically resurrected body is no longer corruptible and mortal, but is immortal and incorruptible. It is not flesh and blood, for there is no blood, but it is flesh and bones like Jesus had when He appeared to the apostles and many others (see Luke 24: 36-39).A physical resurrected body is sometimes called a spiritual body. This does not mean that it is a "spirit body" without flesh and bones, but the word "spiritual" in this case means more along the lines that a physical resurrect body is above the world, above corruption. A physical resurrected body is not a spirit, but it is spirit body within a physical body of flesh and bones.The Book of Mormon put it this way: 40 And he shall come into the world to redeem his people; and he shall take upon him the transgressions of those who believe on his name; and these are they that shall have eternal life, and salvation cometh to none else. 41 Therefore the wicked remain as though there had been no redemption made, except it be the loosing of the bands of death; for behold, the day cometh that all shall rise from the dead and stand before God, and be judged according to their works. 42 Now, there is a death which is called a temporal death; and the death of Christ shall loose the bands of this temporal death, that all shall be raised from this temporal death. 43 The spirit and the body shall be reunited again in its perfect form; both limb and joint shall be restored to its proper frame, even as we now are at this time; and we shall be brought to stand before God, knowing even as we know now, and have a bright recollection of all our guilt. 44 Now, this restoration shall come to all, both old and young, both bond and free, both male and female, both the wicked and the righteous; and even there shall not so much as a hair of their heads be lost; but every thing shall be restored to its perfect frame, as it is now, or in the body, and shall be brought and be arraigned before the bar of Christ the Son, and God the Father, and the Holy Spirit, which is one Eternal God, to be judged according to their works, whether they be good or whether they be evil. 45 Now, behold, I have spoken unto you concerning the death of the mortal body, and also concerning the resurrection of the mortal body. I say unto you that this mortal body is raised to an immortal body, that is from death, even from the first death unto life, that they can die no more; their spirits uniting with their bodies, never to be divided; thus the whole becoming spiritual and immortal, that they can no more see corruption. (Alma 11: 40-45).The physical resurrected body of the infiniteJesus Christ does not limit Him in any way. Indeed, His physical resurrected body has propelled Him to greatness and gaining "all power" in heaven and in earth. His physical resurrected body is the reason He was able to conquer death. 16 �Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. 17 And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. 18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. 19 �Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: (Matt: 28: 16-19).You also said: "ALL professing Christians who worship Jesus as God are IDOLATERS [and I mean EVERYONE who worships Jesus as God in ANY WAY]From Catholics to LDS. ALL have changed the image of the Invisible God into one of His creations." End QuoteFrom the above scripture we see that the apostles themselves worship the Resurrected Jesus Christ: "And when they saw him, they worshipped him". I do not think that they were idolaters.So, we have some disagreement here, but that's okay we can still discuss our points. Harold
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 26, 2012 11:56:34 AM PDT
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The Word is Christ. God plans; the Son accomplishes all that the Father has planned, and the Spirit applies all that the Son has accomplished. Be renewed in the spirit of your mind. Be transformed by the renewing of your mind. If you say that God is "1", I might say that God is "3". If you say that He is "3", I might say that He is "1". Why do you argue about the great mysteries in your natural mind? Where is the "mind of Christ"?Jesus said: "Do you not know that I am in the Father; the Father is in me, and I am in you"?All the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily in Christ. All that the Father has is in the Son. All the Son has is imparted to us thru the Spirit in our spirit. All the reasonings and arguments put forth are but shadows of the truth. Only Christ is the Life and the Reality. Only with the wisdom and knowledge of God (not about God) can we know the things of God. The mind of man can understand the things of man. But as far as the heavens are above the earth so are the thoughts of God. Who can know the things of God except God. If God, in Christ, as the Spirit lives in you, then and only then, is the Truth and the Reality living in you.
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 26, 2012 4:11:46 PM PDT
3d,But, don't you realize that human beings, using their "natural minds", decided that Jesus is the Second Person in the Trinity [and even that thereis even a Trinity]Human beings use their own God-given abilities to reason to interpret the Holy Scriptures, always have, and always will.To deny your own ability to reason is to deny the God Who gives us this reason.If Jesus is in the Father, and we are in him, does this make us Jesus also? Absolutely not! That is the type of "reasoning"you are using. It is really not "reason" at all. It is "anti-reason".You deny others the ability to use their reason to attempt to understand and know God, yet don't deny yourself this.NO WHERE in Holy Scripture is the nature and substance of God called "a mystery". It is only a "mystery" to you be-cause you refuse to use your reason. Not to me and many, many others.A servant of Christ Jesus,Donald Lee McDaniel
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 27, 2012 9:38:23 PM PDT
At this point (261 posts) of the discussion.Have you received an answer to your question below? "Does anyone have a SIMPLE, CLEAR, SHORT, LOGICAL, explanation for how you handle the distinctions , if any, or the identify , if that is true, of the Father=God, Son=Christ, and the Holy Spirit, whatever that last thing really is". That meets your above requirements and details the reality you are asking for?
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 28, 2012 10:42:21 AM PDT
nobody can make any sense out of it because it is logically total nonsense to squish the three separate entities into one and the same entity
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 28, 2012 12:38:23 PM PDT
Daniel...You say human beings use their natural minds to 'decide' and you also say that human beings use their own God-given abilities to reason for the purpose of interpretation. I agree. You also say that to deny one's own ability to reason is to deny the God Who gives reason. I don't deny that we have the ability to reason. You ask the question "If Jesus is in the Father, and we are in Him, does this make us Jesus also?" I say this: we can never be Christ in the Godhead. But we are being transformed and conformed to His image day by day; growing in both His life and nature. We have "put off the old man and put on the new". As children of the living God we are new creatures in Christ.In the New Testament the word 'mystery' is used 27 times. However, it is not used in the sense or way of meaning that we normally think of it. Where the word mystery is used it does not mean or refer to something that we cannot understand; but, rather to something once hidden-now revealed. That is the intention of my use of the word. I apologize to you for not making my meaning more clear. As to your claim that I deny others, how could this possibly be so? Can I deny you anything? But, if we seek to know God by our reason then we will not be successful. It is the Spirit that gives life; it is the Spirit that gives us the wisdom and knowledge of God - not our minds. Else, why would our Lord command us to "deny yourselves"; and again, as the Word of the Lord was given us thru Paul: "I must decrease that He may increase"? Or this from our Lord: "if anyone would follow me, let him deny himself and take up his cross daily". Because of this it must be painfully aware to all of us that anything that comes from our old man is but wood, grass, and stubble. I am not anti-reason but I choose to wait upon the Lord to reveal to me His own wisdom and understanding concerning the Word and to provide me with the utterance to speak forth life. In other words, it is not 'my' reasoning, but rather His reasoning mingled with mine. My prayer is that His thoughts become my thoughts, His understanding becomes my understanding, that I may advance in Him daily from glory to glory (one level of His expression to another level). Daniel, though the last paragraph of my message is paraphrased, it is scriptural. It seems that you may have missed the 'thrust' of the message which is the last sentence. It is true. I am not capable of denying you or anyone else your willingness and abiliity to use your God-given abilities, including the ability to reason. Nevertheless, it is not our mind or our emotion or our will that is imparted by us into Christ! No! It is Christ Himself being imparted into our whole being: spirit, mind, emotion, will. In other words let us pray that we may reach the place wherein Paul spoke the words: "it is not I who live, but Christ who lives in me". May the Lord Jesus Christ be with you daily. In Him.
No Posted on Jun 28, 2012 1:58:21 PM PDT
3d,I hate to disagree, but I do NOT believe that Jesus of Nazareth is the Eternal, Immortal, and Infinite 2nd Person of the Trinity.I'm also not so sure that there is a "Trinity", as in reference to the "Nicene" Creed of Protestants.Additionally, Paul did not teach "He must increase, and I must decrease". This was John Baptizer, and he was speaking in referenceto Christ's position as Messiah, and his position as the forerunner of Messiah, not is reference to his ability to reason.We can't even be Christ in ANY way, much less in the G-dhead, especially since he is not part of the G-dhead, there being no "parts" inG-d.My own opinion [as your words are YOUR "opinion"] is that "denying yourself" is NOT in reference to our spiritual natures, but our flesh, whichdoes NOT include the ability to reason.The "natural mind" has nothing to do with the ability to reason. It has to do with setting our spiritual minds on the desires of the flesh, rather than the desires of the spirit.In fact, the flesh does NOT "reason". It simply reacts to its own desires. Unless we keep these desires in control using our minds, we willmiss out on what G-d has for us in Christ.Our "entire being" is NOT "just spiritual". It includes both our spirits/souls [our intellectual and rational abilities] as well as our bodies.When Paul refers to the "flesh", he is referring to the desires of our bodies. It was NOT our minds which died in Christ, it was our bodies.Our minds are being transformed to be "like" the mind of Christ. Our bodies will be transformed to be like his when we put on immortalityand incorruption when we are raised from the dead or changed when he returns.If we refuse to use our rational abilities, our bodies will rule over our souls, and we will NOT gain the mind of Christ.YOU, 3d, are the one who uses the term "natural mind". I do not. I do NOT have a "natural mind". I have a G-d-givenand created mind, which is like His. When Paul uses the words "natural mind", he is NOT referring to the substanceof our minds, he is referring to people allowing their minds to be controlled by the desires of the body. Unless ourminds control our bodies, we will continue in sin. This is why Paul teaches that "the mind set upon the flesh is death,but the mind set on the Spirit is Life and Peace."BTW, my name is NOT "Daniel". It is "Donald Lee".a servant of Christ Jesus,Donald Lee McDaniel
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 28, 2012 3:44:26 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 28, 2012 3:46:46 PM PDT
To: andthehorseirodeinontoo...All that the Father has is in the Son. All that the Son has is realized by and thru the Spirit. The Son is the embodiment and fullness of the Godhead. (Note scripture: All the fullness of the Godhead dwells bodily in the Son). The Father comes in the Son and with the Spirit. The Spirit comes with the Father and the Son. The 3 coexist and coinhere. Therefore they are not 3; yet, neither are they 1. The Father reveals all in the Son and the Spirit declares to us all that the Son has received. Do you really think that because you cannot understand with your limited human mind that therefore the Word of God is without merit? Do you think your arrogance will save you? To say "they" are separate and distinct entities is to make a mockery out of the Word of God. Do you really think you can stand at the very edge of darkness and survive?
No In reply to an earlier post on Jun 29, 2012 8:57:02 AM PDT
you have not explained what the godhead iswhy people think it smooshes all 3 entities into onethey are clearly differentJesus = Sonis notFather = Godand the Spirit is a third separate thing what my mind cant comprehend is illogical boolsheet that people try to make up to cover up apparent contradictions in the bible that they dont understand
No Posted on Jun 30, 2012 6:35:10 AM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jun 30, 2012 6:45:27 AM PDT
The idea of the godhead came from the hippy movement in the sixties. For those that were looking for god in those times rhe godhead was all that god was. It was believed that we all returned to be one with the godhead afetr death. Then cam e the new age fundamentalists. Wanting a bigger share of the market, churches started catering to these hippy wanderers and brought their ideas into the church to bring them into the church. Remember, part of the big social changes was the rearrangement of the churches. So Fundamentist churches and the Southern Baptist Convention brought the two together and terms and ideas from both formed the new age fundamnetist religion. The NIV was wrtten to accommodate the new religion and the FDTL ( fundamentists ) as we known them today was born !!Then you need to fast forward to the eighties when Crossroads got into the act, but that's a different story !
No Posted on Jul 20, 2012 3:06:11 AM PDT
God in hebrew is plural as a noun and singular as a verb. (Plural not as in 2+, but 3 or more (its different in the hebrew))The Father, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are God. They are one "unit". The LORD is One (Deut 6:4)Jesus has, as the Messiah, the title "Son of God"; meaning that He is the heir of the Godhead. Jesus on many occasions claimed to be the "I AM" - i.e. GodWhen Jesus said that only the Father knows the date of the rapture, and that He didn't know, He said it when He had surrendered many of His divine attributes such as knowing everything and being everywhere. Now He has them all back. Jesus knows when He will rapture the Church.
No In reply to an earlier post on Jul 20, 2012 2:13:36 PM PDT
Mercersaid: "God in hebrew is plural as a noun and singular as a verb. (Plural not as in 2+, but 3 or more"And your source of information is. . .?So why do you suppose that the Jews are not Trinitarian?What you are actually suggesting here is that there are multiple gods - not multiple persons within one God. Anyone familiar with Hebrew would be familiar with Hebrew plurals of amplification, of excellence or majesty. It's called pluralis maiestatis. The Gesenius Kautsch Hebrew Grammar discusses this feature of Hebrew. There is also and article on the subject in "The American Journal of Semitic Languages and Literature." I'd have to dig out the article on my home computer if you are interested.As for your suggestion that Jesus claimed to be the "I AM," You would first need to establish the validity of the presumption that the Hebrew word, 'ehyeh' means "I am." This word is an imperfect verb, indicating action that is incomplete, and usually corresponds to our future tense in English. In other words, "I will be," not "I am." And this is how the word is translated in most of the 50+ verses where it occurs in the BibleNot only that, but the words Jesus used (ego eimi) are not the same as the words used in the Septuagint. In the Septuagint, the title used by God was "ho on." - the "Being."You have some problems with your assertions. Sorry.
No In reply to an earlier post on Jul 26, 2012 2:37:16 PM PDT
The Godhead is not a concept. It is simply thus: there are 3 divine persons in heaven, the Father, the Son, and the Spirit. They are separate and distinct persons just like other groups of persons would be. They are also one in the sense of being one in goal, unity, and purpose just as a husband and wife become one in goal, unity, and purpose, yet they still remain two persons. Remember even Jesus prayed to the Father that the disciples would become one even as they (the Father and the Son) are one. Now in what sense did the disciples become one? Did they cease to be separate people walking around in their own bodies? No! The only answer that makes any sense is that the disciples became one in goal, purpose, and unity just as the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are one. The only difference in this unity is that the bonds that exist in people being one in unity and in family ties are of a finite nature whereas in the case of divine persons, the bond is of an infinite nature.
No In reply to an earlier post on Jul 26, 2012 5:39:40 PM PDT
Scott,Your definition is good, but there is another difference between the bonds which exist in the Persons of God and the bonds which exist inhuman persons: we have bodies, while the persons of the Godhead have no bodies, being Infinite in both Substance and Nature. TheirSubstance is Spirit, while their Nature is rational intelligence.If we say that Christ Jesus is "the Tabernacle of God", we say rightly, because the fullness of the Godhead [i.e., "Father, Word {Son}, andHoly Spirit"] dwells in Christ Jesus bodily. Not "as" Christ Jesus, but "in" Christ Jesus.The Persons of the Godhead all have one thingIf we say that God, the Word, became the Person, Christ Jesus, in spirit, soul, and body, in Substance, we make God to have a body, when He has none. If we say that there are two Minds/Natures in the one Person of Christ Jesus -- God the Word, and Jesus of Nazareth, we correctly identify both Christ Jesus and the Word of the Father.a servant of Christ Jesus,Donald Lee McDaniel
No In reply to an earlier post on Jul 26, 2012 7:16:55 PM PDT
Last edited by the author on Jul 28, 2012 7:02:06 PM PDT
and, actually, as God, Jesus atoned for sin, which man can't do, and as man, He took on our sinful nature to the cross, although innocent. He deemed Himself a servant to His Eternal Father as man, but was still God the Eternal Son. (John 1:1, Matthew 12:6). Peace always in the Most Precious Blood of Christ
No In reply to an earlier post on Jul 26, 2012 7:29:23 PM PDT
and... said: "Yet some how the "godhead", whatever the bleep that means, concept somehow equates all these different things into one identity yet keeps them separate.ILLOGICAL TO THE MAX. Why is this not just total bullbleep by people. So if you can explain it as noted above then I am all ears to hear your response."and..., think about music.
No In reply to an earlier post on Jul 26, 2012 7:48:32 PM PDT
Still trying to squeeze three genies back into the one bottle.Christianity; Two thousand years of making it up as you go along.

type: global

value: This website is an American multinational technology company which focuses on e-commerce, cloud computing, digital streaming, and artificial intelligence.


text:
Top 10 Hotels in Ameglia, Italy | Hotels.comEnglish (United States)Book online or call 800-246-8357This call is free. 24 hours a day; 7 days a week.HotelsHotel DealsPackages & FlightsGroupsGift CardsHelpWebsite feedbackSign in & AccountSign inCreate an accountYour bookingsTrip PlannerReview a hotelHotels.com® RewardsYour bookingsHotelsHotels in ItalyAmeglia HotelsHotels in Ameglia, ItalySearch & Compare Ameglia HotelsCity, landmark, hotel name, address or zip codeCheck inCheck out I don’t know my datesRooms123456789+Room 1:Adults12345678Aged 18+Children01230-17Age at check in:Child 1:-?-<11234567891011121314151617Show dealsGet Secret Prices on select hotelsThese prices aren’t available to everyone.Unlock nowTrending now in AmegliaPopular hotels in AmegliaMost bookedGolfo dei Poeti Relais & SpaExcellent 4.6 / 5( 84 genuine reviews )175 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 62 people looked at this hotel in the last hourMost recent review"The breakfast is great, dining in the hotel is fantastic. The rooms are quite and peaceful and removed from the city, you don't need to leave but if you want to, there is lots to see around the area. "A Traveller, Oct 2016, CAIl Fortino Mini SuitesStar rating not availableExcellent 4.5 / 5( 85 genuine reviews )133 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 27 people looked at this hotel in the last hourMost recent review"Arriving late was no problem. Stunning views enroute"A Traveller, Oct 2016, GBHostel AmegliaStar rating not availableExcellent 4.0 / 5( 3 genuine reviews )39 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 27 people looked at this hotel in the last hourHotel Sette ArchiGood 3.3 / 5( 8 genuine reviews )86 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 13 people looked at this hotel in the last hourMost recent review"Very nice hotel right in the front of the port. The lady running the hotel was very alert and helping and we were very comfortable in all aspects. And we also tried their restaurant and had the the best pasta frutta di mare that we ever tasted."A Traveller, Oct 2014, GBHotel Ala BiancaFair 2.6 / 5( 20 genuine reviews )179 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 12 people looked at this hotel in the last hourLe Pinette Bed and BreakfastStar rating not availableOutstanding 5.0 / 5( 2 genuine reviews )Hotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 11 people looked at this hotel in the last hourHotel River ParkGood 3.9 / 5( 14 genuine reviews )58 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 10 people looked at this hotel in the last hourMontemarcello ViewStar rating not availableGood 3.5 / 5( 2 genuine reviews )Hotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 10 people looked at this hotel in the last hourAlbachiara InnStar rating not availableFair 2.9 / 5( 10 genuine reviews )21 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 9 people looked at this hotel in the last hourAmeglia Felix ApartmentsStar rating not availableNo Guest Reviews yetHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 9 people looked at this hotel in the last hourB&B Plumbago BlueStar rating not availableNo Guest Reviews yetHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 5 people looked at this hotel in the last hourVilla I PoggioliStar rating not availableNo Guest Reviews yet25 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 4 people looked at this hotel in the last hourCottage FilippiStar rating not availableExcellent 4.0 / 5( 1 genuine review )Hotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 4 people looked at this hotel in the last hourHotels within 5 miles of AmegliaHotel il NidoExcellent 4.3 / 5( 82 genuine reviews )218 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 57 people looked at this hotel in the last hourMost recent review"Please note that this review is based upon visiting during Spring Break, so it is not quite the high season for tourism.
The breakfast - it is a buffet..."A Traveller, Apr 2017, USHotel San TerenzoExcellent 4.4 / 5( 59 genuine reviews )155 reviewsHotels.com® RewardsFor every 10 nights, get 1 free! 44 people looked at this hotel in the last hourMost recent review"The area is amazing and worth a visit. The hotel is very nice and right in the middle of Lerici. The only thing, having rooms facing the street is not the best since you can hear the people walking by right outside your window (and sometimes they knock). The receptionist of the hotel was outsta..."A Traveller, Apr 2017, USSee more hotels in Ameglia, ItalyRecently bookedHotel Rosa dei Venti3 starsfrom $45Hotel il Nido3 starsfrom $79Hostel Amegliafrom $25Locanda Dell'Angelo4 starsfrom $74Hotel Cristallo3 starsfrom $69Pay now or later on most roomsFree cancellation on most roomsPrice GuaranteeMap of Ameglia hotelsLandmarksPunta Corvo BeachHotel typesCheap hotels (9 hotels)Pet Friendly hotels (10 hotels)Free Breakfast hotels (7 hotels)Family-friendly hotels (11 hotels)Best hotels in AmegliaWith hotels.com we help you find the best hotels in Ameglia, Italy.
To make the most of our service, download our mobile & tablet apps and sign up to our newsletter or follow us on Facebook, Google+ or Twitter to receive the latest deals and Hotels.com Ameglia discount codes.See more hotels in Ameglia, ItalyMore Ameglia hotelsChoose one of the following to unlock Secret Prices and pay less on select hotels.EmailSign up for our latest offersHotels.com appDownload the app and book on the goHotels.com® RewardsJoin now! Collect 10 nights, get 1 free*Top DestinationsHotels in New York, New YorkHotels in Las Vegas, NevadaHotels in Chicago, IllinoisHotels in San Francisco, CaliforniaHotels in Washington, District of ColumbiaHotels in Boston, MassachusettsHotels in San Diego, CaliforniaHotels in Orlando, FloridaHotels in London, United KingdomHotels in New Orleans, LouisianaHotels in Los Angeles, CaliforniaHotels in San Antonio, TexasHotels in Paris, FranceHotels in Seattle, WashingtonHotels in Atlanta, GeorgiaHotels in Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaHotels in Austin, TexasHotels in Atlantic City, New JerseyHotels in Rome, ItalyHotels in Myrtle Beach, South CarolinaHotels in Dallas, TexasHotels in Houston, TexasHotels in Denver, ColoradoHotels in Miami, FloridaSupport & FAQsYour bookingsFAQsContact usWebsite feedbackReview a hotelFor Suppliers, Affiliates and the MediaAffiliate with usPrivate LabelPromote with UsTravel AgentsPress OfficeUser Terms and Privacy PolicyTerms & ConditionsPrivacy PolicyCookie PolicyAbout our adsAbout UsAdd your hotelJobsTravel GuidesTop 50 CitiesAll countriesAll hotelsSite index© 2017 Hotels.com, L.P. All rights reserved.Hotels.com and the Hotels.com logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Hotels.com, LP in the U.S. and/or other countries. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.* Learn more about Hotels.com® RewardsABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

value: This website is a website for booking hotel rooms online and by telephone. The company has 85 websites in 34 languages, and lists over 325,000 hotels in approximately 19,000 locations.


text:
Newest 'google-visualization javascript' Questions - Stack Overflow
javascript jquery html css google-visualization asked 24 mins ago
javascript jquery html google-visualization asked 6 hours ago
javascript jquery google-visualization asked 10 hours ago
javascript html google-visualization asked yesterday
javascript jquery google-visualization asked yesterday
javascript html django google-visualization asked yesterday
Google Charts API. I need a way to hide the data in the datatable from the user so that I can still use category picker to filter on hidden values
I'm using the google charts category picker to filter a table by a month value. There will ever only be two values per month, but I only want to show one month at a time. Currently, when the table ...
javascript google-visualization asked 2 days ago
javascript html google-visualization asked 2 days ago
I am using google geochart on mobile devices, and I have enabled zoom. The only problem is that when a user selects (hovers over) a certain marker(or region), the tooltip size remains large. Therefore ...
javascript css google-visualization asked Jul 8 at 15:28
Sorry if the title is a bit verbose, but the question I have is somewhat complicated.
I have two separate data tables (I'll call them Data1 and Data2) and I'm trying to create a single set of Google ...
javascript google-visualization asked Jul 7 at 17:52
Slider Color Configuration using CSS Google Visualization
I want to customize the Google chart slider in control chart. The default setting for the slider label is the name of the column label; the slider thumbs as well as the min-max numbers are blue.
javascript css google-visualization asked Jul 7 at 14:29
user3772904
I'm trying to create a scrolling animation with a Line Chart in Google Charts. I want to display real time data from an external data source, so my data table cannot be populated in advance and it can ...
javascript google-visualization asked Jul 7 at 13:55
Google Visualization Pie Chart - changing text coordinates
I have made a simple donut chart (based on the Google Visualization example at https://google-developers.appspot.com/chart/interactive/docs/gallery/piechart#donut).
As it only shows one slice (the ...
javascript svg google-visualization asked Jul 7 at 12:12
Connect Array to Google Chart
I've been trying for ages to try and connect this array to a google chart and having no luck, would really appreciate some help to locate what I've done wrong. I have a jsfiddle going, and you can see ...
javascript ajax arrays json google-visualization asked Jul 7 at 9:51
javascript google-api google-visualization google-datatable asked Jul 7 at 7:06
Populating data dynamically from ArrayList in Google Charts
I am new to Google Chart API. I am trying to put ArrayList from servlet into Google Charts. But I am not able to do this. I am trying to populate ArrayList which I have passed from servlet in session. ...
javascript jsp google-visualization asked Jul 5 at 20:18
google tree control onClick
I want to click a rectangle in the Google tree control and set a value in another part of the page.
I am using the following code, but nothing is happening as an alert.
javascript google-visualization asked Jul 5 at 7:45
user3093994
I am working on an interface that contains several high-intensity SQL queries, then renders multiple Google charts which are currently being called via AJAX using the google.visualization.Query ...
javascript ajax google-visualization google-query-language asked Jul 1 at 15:39
Change Google Geochart marker into a custom png icon
I would like to ask for help how to change the circle marker in Google Geochart
I have already implemented the answer on this link.
appendChild to SVG defs to create Image Background in Marker for ...
javascript google-maps-api-3 svg google-visualization asked Jul 1 at 10:57
I was able to get drill down functionality using google charts api working. So basically in my view class, I have javascript which loads the google charts library and draws a pie chart.
On that pie ...
javascript google-visualization asked Jun 25 at 5:25
What is the format for javascript datetime that Google Requires for charts?
I'm working with the google chart and I've tried so many date formats and nothing is working. I'm ready to just use moments format feature, however I need the google date format for datetime.
javascript datetime google-visualization asked Jun 24 at 7:00
99211032
Type mismatch for number in Google Chart API
I have an array and the second column with values like this 2050.878456 and inside my javascript function to create a Area Chart I made the following
javascript google-visualization asked Jun 23 at 12:17
1 2 3 4 5 … 28 next newest google-visualization javascript questions feed
google-visualization javascript Related Tags
google-chartwrapper × 22
pie-chart × 21
linechart × 20

value: This website is a question and answer website for professional and enthusiast programmers. It is the flagship site of the Stack Exchange Network, created in 2008 by Jeff Atwood and Joel Spolsky.


text:
Evaluation of the dietary intake of homebound elderly and the feasibility of dietary supplementation. - PubMed - NCBI
Format: AbstractFormatSummarySummary (text)AbstractAbstract (text)MEDLINEXMLPMID ListApplySend toChoose DestinationFileClipboardCollectionsE-mailOrderMy BibliographyCitation managerFormatSummary (text)Abstract (text)MEDLINEXMLPMID ListCSVCreate File1 selected item: 8077577FormatSummarySummary (text)AbstractAbstract (text)MEDLINEXMLPMID ListMeSH and Other DataE-mailSubjectAdditional textE-mailDidn't get the message? Find out why...Add to ClipboardAdd to CollectionsOrder articlesAdd to My BibliographyGenerate a file for use with external citation management software.Create File
See comment in PubMed Commons belowJ Am Coll Nutr. 1994 Jun;13(3):277-84.Evaluation of the dietary intake of homebound elderly and the feasibility of dietary supplementation.Gray-Donald K1, Payette H, Boutier V, Page S.Author information1School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, McGill University, PQ, Canada.AbstractOBJECTIVE: The dietary intake of elderly subjects receiving home care services (n = 145) was studied to assess the adequacy of their intake, and their ability to maintain normal body weight. In a second part of the study, the feasibility of providing nutrient supplements to underweight subjects or those with important recent weight loss was evaluated.METHOD: For the survey, three 24-hour recalls, height, weight and lifestyle habits were evaluated in a home interview and two follow-up telephone contacts. The effects of dietary supplementation of 14 subjects at risk of malnutrition (underweight or with substantial weight loss) over 12 weeks were evaluated.RESULTS: Mean energy intake for the entire group was low (males 1546 kcal; females 1152 kcal) and on average barely covered estimated resting energy expenditure. Recent weight loss was negatively correlated with energy intake among underweight subjects (R = -0.64; p < 0.001). Dietary supplementation resulted in an average increase in daily intake of 390 kcal with an average weight gain of 1.27 kg over the 12-week period. Weight change was directly associated with measures of functional status; hand-grip strength (r = 0.75; p = 0.002) and general well-being score (r = 0.46; p = 0.095).CONCLUSION: Homebound elderly were at high risk of inadequate protein and energy intake. Dietary supplementation in high risk individuals was well tolerated and led to modest weight gain and improvements in general well-being.Comment inThe importance of micronutrients. [J Am Coll Nutr. 1994]PMID: 8077577 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE] SharePublication Types, MeSH TermsPublication TypesResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tMeSH TermsAgedAged, 80 and overDiet*Diet SurveysEnergy Intake*Evaluation Studies as TopicFeasibility StudiesFemaleFood, Fortified*Health Services for the Aged*Home Care Services*HumansMaleNutritional StatusWeight GainWeight LossLinkOut - more resourcesMedicalClinicalTrials.govDiets - MedlinePlus Health InformationHome Care Services - MedlinePlus Health InformationPubMed Commons home

value: This website is part of the United States National Library of Medicine , a branch of the National Institutes of Health . It is approved and funded by the government of the United States.


text: _.Kj.prototype.Ae=function(){var a=new gj;this.H=a;var b=_.Qh.Cb();b.kb=!0;this.R();b.Pa=a;_.mfa(b);a.Za=b;b=_.Of("Im6cmf").Na()+"/jserror";$ha(b);b=_.ae(_.Of("cfb2h").Na());kj.buildLabel=b;if(Jj)for(var b=Jj.H,c=0;c<_.Ij.length;c++)b.push(_.Ij[c]);var b=window,d,c=new Ifa,e=b||window,f=e.document.documentElement,g=new Wfa(f);a:{for(var l=0;lTake that Niners Fans!! My city gets busy!!! #BigBlue!!!!Press question mark to see available shortcut keysHomeCollectionsJoin Google+Send FeedbackHelpRegionPrivacy Policy - Terms of Service - Maps Terms©2017 GoogleSearchSign inBuilt4AnythingPublicJan 22, 2012Take that Niners Fans!! My city gets busy!!! #BigBlue!!!! one plus one 1 2 comments 2 no sharesShared publicly•View activityDevon DiamondDefenseJan 22, 2012Built4Anythingwe in te Superbowl baby!!Jan 22, 2012

value: This website .


text:
Amazon.co.uk:Customer reviews: As Serious As Your Life: Black Music and the Free Jazz Revolution, 1957-1977 (Serpent's Tail Classics)
As Serious As Your Life: Black Music and the Free Jazz Revolution,...
As Serious As Your Life: Black Music and the Free Jazz Revolution, 1957-1977 (Serpent's Tail Classics)
byVal Wilmer
5.0 out of 5 starsIf you care about culture in the 20th century, ...
If you care about culture in the 20th century, black, white or any other colour then read this book. It is written in a very readable style with copious references and some pictures of the luminaries of the emerging black musical revolution in the USA. I think it could have done with more pictures but that's just me. Not sure Val Wilmer plays an instrument but speaks eloquently on the process of creating jazz. It has the air of authenticity and obviously she had the confidence of the (mainly) black musicians around her. It also reflects the turbulent and formative political and social atmostphere of the 60s/70s. A gem.
5.0 out of 5 starsInfluential, erudite and fascinating.
Superbly written history of a much misunderstood period in black music. Essential reading for anyone interested in how real musicians operate.
5.0 out of 5 starsinteresting aspect of Jazz.
excellent well researched book on an interesting aspect of Jazz.
P. T. J. BRADLEY
Brilliant close-up views of legends, giving them the spotlight they have always deserved and rarely enjoyed.
byValerie Wilmer
byDavid Stubbs
As Serious As Your Life: John Coltrane and Beyond (Five Star)
‹ See all details for As Serious As Your Life: Black Music and the Free Jazz Revolution,...


text:
Europe France Occitanie Aude Narbonne Narbonne Restaurants Restaurant L'Estagnol
#64 of 234 Restaurants in Narbonne $$ - $$$
Mediterranean, Gastropub, French 5 Bis Cours Mirabeau, 11100, Narbonne, France+33 4 68 65 09 27Website
Also show MapSatellite Map updates are paused. Zoom in to see updated info. Reset zoom Updating Map... Return to Map Overview 3.5 228 reviewsExcellent18%Very good54%Average15%Poor9%Terrible4%Sep 14, 2016“Next door to Les Halles”May 9, 2016“Coeliac friendly/dogs holiday”Open NowMon - Sat12:00 pm - 2:30 pm7:30 pm - 10:30 pmAll hours CUISINES Mediterranean, Gastropub, French, Pub PRICE $$ - $$$RATINGS ServiceFoodValueAtmosphereLOCATION 5 Bis Cours Mirabeau, 11100, Narbonne, FranceAll Details Improve This ListingIs this a Mediterranean restaurant? Yes No Unsure Is this a pub?Yes No Unsure Does this restaurant offer highchairs for toddlers?Yes No Unsure Is this restaurant good for dinner?Yes No Unsure Is this restaurant good for lunch?Yes No Unsure Is this restaurant good for brunch?Yes No Unsure Can a vegetarian person get a good meal at this restaurant?Yes No Unsure Can a gluten free person get a good meal at this restaurant?Yes No Unsure Is this restaurant good for breakfast?Yes No Unsure Can a vegan person get a good meal at this restaurant?Yes No Unsure Thanks for helping! Share another experience before you go. Write a ReviewReviews (228)Traveler rating Excellent7Very good20Average6Poor3Terrible2Traveler typeFamiliesCouplesSoloBusinessFriendsTime of year Mar-MayJun-AugSep-NovDec-FebLanguage All languages English (38)French (167)Spanish (10)More languages Language English (38)French (167)Spanish (10)German (9)Italian (3)Russian (1)See what travelers are saying: 1 - 10 of 38 reviews
Mike PDover15419Reviewed September 14, 2016 via mobile Next door to Les HallesIt was literally chucking to down so we dashed in to avoid a soaking. Jam packed full of, I presume locals, having lunch. Doesn't rate that high on TA but actually very good. Had the 16.5 euro lunch. Aubergine and mozzarella started, brochettes be boeuf...MoreThank Mike P Susan LLiverpool, United Kingdom444Reviewed May 9, 2016 via mobile Coeliac friendly/dogs holidayI haven't been here for a couple of years, but this was rainy Sunday and it was nearby. Lots of customers, all French, except for us. The service is slick and professional but accommodating. We had veg instead of chips . Excellent. It was simple...MoreThank Susan L arneo05luxembourg615Reviewed May 7, 2016 via mobile LoisirReal fresh seafoods as the main speciality menu. Mediterranean kitchen with a taste of gastronomy with affordable price.Thank arneo05 HuffBirminghamKidderminster, United Kingdom14169Reviewed October 22, 2015 Great fishThis restaurant was recommended in our Rough Guide to Languedoc Roussillon and we were not disappointed. The surroundings within the restaurant could have had a little more ambiance, but the service was great and our waiter had a great sense of humour. I had a...MoreThank HuffBirmingham Ledbury01Birmingham, United Kingdom8446Reviewed July 12, 2015 Poor customer serviceWe know the restaurants in Narbonne well and hadn't been to L'Estangnol for some time so we thought we would see if it had improved. Sadly it has not. We asked to swap the starter on the (most expensive) fixed price menu for a cheaper...More1 Thank Ledbury01 DimitrivazTucson, Arizona12841Reviewed June 13, 2015 via mobile Nice setting, pretty good foodEn Face and L'Estagnol were both recommended by Le Boat. When En Face wouldn't seat us without reservations, we crossed over the canal to L'Estagnol. It was very nice eating outside and the service was reasonable. For our first meal in France, although my tuna...MoreThank Dimitrivaz Job H41Reviewed May 17, 2015 via mobile Fine restaurant We had a nice dinner. Excellent prepared tuna. Smal schnitzels for the kids but good taste. I suppose average €.
Rating: goodThank Job H MaisonRoubia2429Reviewed April 13, 2015 Fine, but better ones nearby!One of many restaurants that line both sides of the Canal in the recently made over town centre of Narbonne. They always have good value Prix Fix menu at lunchtime, and is always well supported by the locals, but we feel there are better options...MoreThank MaisonRoubia Fiona H350108Reviewed January 11, 2015 GoodWe visited on a cold windy night, restaurant was more than worthwhile. It wasn't busy which made us a bit suspicious, but the food and service were great. The oysters were amazing, I could have had just these.Thank Fiona H cbbarrie2016Newton Solney, United Kingdom10949Reviewed October 24, 2014 disappointing serviceWe used to visit this restaurant regularly and found it good in every respect. This was a return visit after a gap of 10 or so years so we expected some differences but we were more disappointed than we had feared. Food is good -...MoreThank cbbarrie2016 PreviousNext1234Updating list... Nearby Nearby RestaurantsA la table du Marche421 reviews .04 miles away Chez Bebelle570 reviews .03 miles away Le Bistrot187 reviews .07 miles away auberge des jacobins134 reviews .05 miles away Nearby AttractionsLes Halles de Narbonne413 reviews .04 miles away Cathedrale St-Just623 reviews .21 miles away Palais des Archeveques173 reviews .14 miles away Bar Karaoke les Korrigans6 reviews .37 miles away Questions & AnswersGet quick answers from Restaurant L'Estagnol staff and past visitors.Note: your question will be posted publicly on the Questions & Answers page.Verification: Posting guidelinesSubmit
Mediterranean, Gastropub, French, Pub
5 Bis Cours Mirabeau, 11100, Narbonne, France Location:

value: This website is an American online travel company that operates a website and mobile app with user-generated content and a comparison shopping website.


text: Sorry, no products matched "" Check your spelling Use different keywords and try again Contact your local store Compute- app-11031821-4-59262963, DC- prod-dal3, ENV- prod-a, Ver- 46.0.0, SHA- bb3d0941156637d9a4ff37a5e0c3039d98baf1e2, Log- 97f18696-15874-156e380803c000 Site Information Be the first to save! Email Address Sign up Privacy Policy Stay connected Mobile apps Help Feedback MoneyCenter Privacy & Security CA Privacy Rights Terms of Use Walmart services See All Services Walmart MoneyCenter Walmart Credit Card Product Care Plans Walmart Pay Get to know us About Walmart.com Corporate Suppliers Marketplace Careers @WalmartLabs Walmart.com Terms of Use About Our Ads Affiliate Program CA Privacy Rights Privacy & Security Customer service Returns Policy Product Recalls Int’l Customers Tax Exempt Program Contact Us Feedback Store Pickup In the spotlight Expand Baby Cribs Strollers Diapers Baby Feeding Car Seats Expand Electronics Cut the Cable Computers TVs iPads & Tablets Expand Fitness Exercise Machines Vitamins Ellipticals Treadmills Fitbit Expand Keep Cool Air Conditioners Fans Swimming Pools Pool Toys Popular Products Expand International Sites Argentina Brazil Canada Chile China Japan Mexico United Kingdom © Walmart Stores, Inc. To ensure we’re able to help you as best we can, please include your reference number: Ref:

value: This website is an American multinational retail corporation that operates a chain of hypermarkets , discount department stores, and grocery stores from the United States, headquartered in Bentonville, Arkansas.