Unveiling Intrinsic Dimension of Texts: from Academic Abstract to Creative Story
Intrinsic dimension (ID) is an important tool in modern LLM analysis, informing studies of training dynamics, scaling behavior, and dataset structure, yet its textual determinants remain underexplored. We provide the first comprehensive study grounding ID in interpretable text properties through cross-encoder analysis, linguistic features, and sparse autoencoders (SAEs). In this work, we establish three key findings. First, ID is complementary to entropy-based metrics: after controlling for length, the two are uncorrelated, with ID capturing geometric complexity orthogonal to prediction quality. Second, ID exhibits robust genre stratification: scientific prose shows low ID (~8), encyclopedic content medium ID (~9), and creative/opinion writing high ID (~10.5) across all models tested. This reveals that contemporary LLMs find scientific text "representationally simple" while fiction requires additional degrees of freedom. Third, using SAEs, we identify causal features: scientific signals (formal tone, report templates, statistics) reduce ID; humanized signals (personalization, emotion, narrative) increase it. Steering experiments confirm these effects are causal. Thus, for contemporary models, scientific writing appears comparatively "easy", whereas fiction, opinion, and affect add representational degrees of freedom. Our multi-faceted analysis provides practical guidance for the proper use of ID and the sound interpretation of ID-based results.
6923ff30b5612535ed955a20
Vladislav Pedashenko
6923ff30b5612535ed955a21
Laida Kushnareva
6923ff30b5612535ed955a22
Yana Khassan Nibal
6923ff30b5612535ed955a23
Eduard Tulchinskii
6923ff30b5612535ed955a24
Kristian Kuznetsov
6923ff30b5612535ed955a25
Vladislav Zharchinskii
6923ff30b5612535ed955a26
Yury Maximov
6923ff30b5612535ed955a27
Irina Piontkovskaya
Unveiling Intrinsic Dimension of Texts: from Academic Abstract to Creative Story
Intrinsic dimension (ID) is an important tool in modern LLM analysis, informing studies of training dynamics, scaling behavior, and dataset structure, yet its textual determinants remain underexplored. We provide the first comprehensive study grounding ID in interpretable text properties through cross-encoder analysis, linguistic features, and sparse autoencoders (SAEs). In this work, we establish three key findings. First, ID is complementary to entropy-based metrics: after controlling for length, the two are uncorrelated, with ID capturing geometric complexity orthogonal to prediction quality. Second, ID exhibits robust genre stratification: scientific prose shows low ID (~8), encyclopedic content medium ID (~9), and creative/opinion writing high ID (~10.5) across all models tested. This reveals that contemporary LLMs find scientific text "representationally simple" while fiction requires additional degrees of freedom. Third, using SAEs, we identify causal features: scientific signals (formal tone, report templates, statistics) reduce ID; humanized signals (personalization, emotion, narrative) increase it. Steering experiments confirm these effects are causal. Thus, for contemporary models, scientific writing appears comparatively "easy", whereas fiction, opinion, and affect add representational degrees of freedom. Our multi-faceted analysis provides practical guidance for the proper use of ID and the sound interpretation of ID-based results.
The study explores intrinsic dimension in large language models through cross-encoder analysis, linguistic features, and sparse autoencoders, revealing its independence from entropy, genre-specific stratification, and causal features related to text type.
intrinsic dimension cross-encoder analysis sparse autoencoders entropy-based metrics genre stratification scientific prose encyclopedic content creative/opinion writing causal features formal tone report templates statistics humanized signals personalization emotion narrative