Active Video Perception: Iterative Evidence Seeking for Agentic Long Video Understanding
Long video understanding (LVU) is challenging because answering real-world queries often depends on sparse, temporally dispersed cues buried in hours of mostly redundant and irrelevant content. While agentic pipelines improve video reasoning capabilities, prevailing frameworks rely on a query-agnostic captioner to perceive video information, which wastes computation on irrelevant content and blurs fine-grained temporal and spatial information. Motivated by active perception theory, we argue that LVU agents should actively decide what, when, and where to observe, and continuously assess whether the current observation is sufficient to answer the query. We present Active Video Perception (AVP), an evidence-seeking framework that treats the video as an interactive environment and acquires compact, queryrelevant evidence directly from pixels. Concretely, AVP runs an iterative plan-observe-reflect process with MLLM agents. In each round, a planner proposes targeted video interactions, an observer executes them to extract time-stamped evidence, and a reflector evaluates the sufficiency of the evidence for the query, either halting with an answer or triggering further observation. Across five LVU benchmarks, AVP achieves highest performance with significant improvements. Notably, AVP outperforms the best agentic method by 5.7% in average accuracy while only requires 18.4% inference time and 12.4% input tokens.
6937077219d912300c34a0d1
Ziyang Wang
6937077219d912300c34a0d2
Honglu Zhou
6937077219d912300c34a0d3
Shijie Wang
6937077219d912300c34a0d4
Junnan Li
6937077219d912300c34a0d5
Caiming Xiong
6937077219d912300c34a0d6
Silvio Savarese
6937077219d912300c34a0d7
Mohit Bansal
6937077219d912300c34a0d8
Michael S. Ryoo
6937077219d912300c34a0d9
Juan Carlos Niebles
Active Video Perception: Iterative Evidence Seeking for Agentic Long Video Understanding
Long video understanding (LVU) is challenging because answering real-world queries often depends on sparse, temporally dispersed cues buried in hours of mostly redundant and irrelevant content. While agentic pipelines improve video reasoning capabilities, prevailing frameworks rely on a query-agnostic captioner to perceive video information, which wastes computation on irrelevant content and blurs fine-grained temporal and spatial information. Motivated by active perception theory, we argue that LVU agents should actively decide what, when, and where to observe, and continuously assess whether the current observation is sufficient to answer the query. We present Active Video Perception (AVP), an evidence-seeking framework that treats the video as an interactive environment and acquires compact, queryrelevant evidence directly from pixels. Concretely, AVP runs an iterative plan-observe-reflect process with MLLM agents. In each round, a planner proposes targeted video interactions, an observer executes them to extract time-stamped evidence, and a reflector evaluates the sufficiency of the evidence for the query, either halting with an answer or triggering further observation. Across five LVU benchmarks, AVP achieves highest performance with significant improvements. Notably, AVP outperforms the best agentic method by 5.7% in average accuracy while only requires 18.4% inference time and 12.4% input tokens.
Active Video Perception (AVP) improves long video understanding by iteratively selecting and evaluating query-relevant video evidence, achieving higher accuracy with reduced computational cost.
long video understanding agentic pipelines query-agnostic captioner active perception theory Active Video Perception MLLM agents plan-observe-reflect process time-stamped evidence