question_id
int64
337
65.5k
question
stringlengths
11
209
answer
stringlengths
1
145
document_text
stringlengths
30
7.9k
page
int64
1
1
other_metadata
dict
num_tokens
int64
26
1.76k
match_type
stringclasses
3 values
messages
listlengths
2
2
337
what is the date mentioned in this letter?
1/8/93
Page 1 Confidential .. .. RJRT PR APPROVAL DATE : 1/8/13 Ru alAs PROPOSED RELEASE DATE: for response FOR RELEASE TO: CONTACT: P. CARTER ROUTE TO Initials pate Peggy Carter Ac Maura Payne David Fishel Tom GRISCom Diane Barrows Ed Blackmer Tow Rucker TR Return to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building 51142 3977 . . Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 279, "image": "xnbl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "xnbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
148
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConfidential\n.. ..\nRJRT PR APPROVAL\nDATE :\n1/8/13\nRu alAs\nPROPOSED RELEASE DATE:\nfor response\nFOR RELEASE TO:\nCONTACT:\nP. CARTER\nROUTE TO\nInitials\npate\nPeggy Carter\nAc\nMaura Payne\nDavid Fishel\nTom GRISCom\nDiane Barrows\nEd Blackmer\nTow Rucker\nTR\nReturn to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building\n51142 3977\n. .\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037\n\nQuestion: what is the date mentioned in this letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1/8/93", "role": "assistant" } ]
338
what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?
P. Carter
Page 1 Confidential .. .. RJRT PR APPROVAL DATE : 1/8/13 Ru alAs PROPOSED RELEASE DATE: for response FOR RELEASE TO: CONTACT: P. CARTER ROUTE TO Initials pate Peggy Carter Ac Maura Payne David Fishel Tom GRISCom Diane Barrows Ed Blackmer Tow Rucker TR Return to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building 51142 3977 . . Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 279, "image": "xnbl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "xnbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
147
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConfidential\n.. ..\nRJRT PR APPROVAL\nDATE :\n1/8/13\nRu alAs\nPROPOSED RELEASE DATE:\nfor response\nFOR RELEASE TO:\nCONTACT:\nP. CARTER\nROUTE TO\nInitials\npate\nPeggy Carter\nAc\nMaura Payne\nDavid Fishel\nTom GRISCom\nDiane Barrows\nEd Blackmer\nTow Rucker\nTR\nReturn to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building\n51142 3977\n. .\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037\n\nQuestion: what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "P. Carter", "role": "assistant" } ]
339
Which corporation's letterhead is this?
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT . . . . INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8. 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one .Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. .Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. future smoking. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for .Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. . Extremely fast buming cigarette. -. ..". " . . Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. . . . . Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. . More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch . Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 280, "image": "mxcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
496
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: Which corporation's letterhead is this?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation", "role": "assistant" } ]
340
Who is in cc in this letter?
T.F. Riehl
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT . . . . INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8. 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one .Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. .Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. future smoking. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for .Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. . Extremely fast buming cigarette. -. ..". " . . Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. . . . . Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. . More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch . Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 280, "image": "mxcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
498
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: Who is in cc in this letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "T.F. Riehl", "role": "assistant" } ]
341
what is the subject of this letter?
Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT . . . . INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8. 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one .Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. .Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. future smoking. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for .Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. . Extremely fast buming cigarette. -. ..". " . . Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. . . . . Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. . More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch . Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 280, "image": "mxcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
501
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the subject of this letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483", "role": "assistant" } ]
343
What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?
499150498
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT . . . . INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: R. H. Honeycutt CC: T.F. Riehl FROM: C. J. Cook DATE: May 8. 1995 SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483 The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique taste or look. The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions. Appearance This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with minimal changes in smoke chemistry Two cigarettes in one .Multi-plug to build your own cigarette. .Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette. future smoking. Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for .Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm. . Extremely fast buming cigarette. -. ..". " . . Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics. . . . . Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight. . More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch . Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow) and all white cigarettes. 499150498 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 280, "image": "mxcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
500
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "499150498", "role": "assistant" } ]
388
How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation
5.
Page 2 2. The rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SILPM mass flow meter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original design, flow is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4" needle valve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke measurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter is bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4" needle valve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2" piping. The latter valve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a 0-25 cm H, O Dwyer Magnehelico gauge) to that of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining the flow when the meter is removed from the circuit. Modifications to Readout Instrumentation: The single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier was replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the zero attenuateon level. 2: To reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output voltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the instrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data system and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced 3. Signal leads were re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF pickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated. 4. A running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual aid to the operator. 5. Changes to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate minor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any reported parameters. CC: P: N. Gauvin B. L. Goodman A. C. Lilly D. D. McRae E. B. Sanders J. E. Wickham Central Files -2- 2022156306 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 297, "image": "sxxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
488
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\n2.\nThe rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SILPM mass flow\nmeter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original\ndesign, flow is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4\" needle\nvalve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke\nmeasurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter\nis bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4\" needle valve\n(Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2\" piping. The latter\nvalve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a 0-25 cm\nH, O Dwyer Magnehelico gauge) to that of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining\nthe flow when the meter is removed from the circuit.\nModifications to Readout Instrumentation:\nThe single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier\nwas replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the\nzero attenuateon level.\n2:\nTo reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output\nvoltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the\ninstrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data\nsystem and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced\n3.\nSignal leads were re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF\npickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated.\n4.\nA running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual\naid to the operator.\n5.\nChanges to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate\nminor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any\nreported parameters.\nCC:\nP: N. Gauvin\nB. L. Goodman\nA. C. Lilly\nD. D. McRae\nE. B. Sanders\nJ. E. Wickham\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022156306\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation", "role": "user" }, { "content": "5.", "role": "assistant" } ]
399
what is the date in the letter
June 11, 1990
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. 2022155886 C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 314, "image": "nhxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
564
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the date in the letter", "role": "user" }, { "content": "June 11, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]
400
To whom this is addressed
Dr.K.S.Houghton
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. 2022155886 C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 314, "image": "nhxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
561
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: To whom this is addressed", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Dr.K.S.Houghton", "role": "assistant" } ]
401
Who sent the letter?
Ted Sanders
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. 2022155886 C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 314, "image": "nhxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
557
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Who sent the letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Ted Sanders", "role": "assistant" } ]
402
Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from
Richmond
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To Dr. K. S. Houghton Date: June 11, 1990 From: Ted Sanders Subject: Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4 Reduced Sidestream Trim Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density, use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids (malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70% sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette. A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery. Lotus The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the models. 2022155886 C90-03066 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 314, "image": "nhxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
561
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Richmond", "role": "assistant" } ]
411
What sort of communication/letter is this ?
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To : Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From : H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART : Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level and 208 increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.08 OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are in progress . Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION : Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress. 2022156205 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 352, "image": "mxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
593
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What sort of communication/letter is this ?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE", "role": "assistant" } ]
412
What is the date mentioned in the letter?
April 27, 1990
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To : Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From : H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART : Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level and 208 increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.08 OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are in progress . Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION : Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress. 2022156205 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 352, "image": "mxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
592
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "April 27, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]
413
Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?
A second Danchi Test
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To : Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From : H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART : Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level and 208 increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.08 OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are in progress . Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION : Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress. 2022156205 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 352, "image": "mxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
597
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "A second Danchi Test", "role": "assistant" } ]
414
What is the subject of the document/letter?
Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To : Mr. James L. Myracle Date: April 27, 1990 From : H. L. Spielberg Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990 C90-03267 PROJECT ART : Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted for analyses. These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level and 208 increased level of GMC on filler. The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non- menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7, 13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a control product at 13.08 OV. Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week. Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double- batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro. Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are in progress . Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at Bermuda Hundred Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol levels has been shipped. Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super Lights and "Castor" type flavors. TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION : Subjective Studies : A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15 mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress. 2022156205 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 352, "image": "mxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
597
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the document/letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]
416
what is the index for Retention of Franchise
100
Page 9 Consumer Dynamics CARLTON index . Retention of Franchise: 81.3% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 9.3% ( 88) Rate of Quitting Losses 9.4% (113) . Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 81.9% (116) . Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (100) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.1% ( 6) . ... . 314002838 Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 355, "image": "rzbj0037_9.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "9" }
164
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the index for Retention of Franchise", "role": "user" }, { "content": "100", "role": "assistant" } ]
417
What is the source
USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Page 9 Consumer Dynamics CARLTON index . Retention of Franchise: 81.3% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 9.3% ( 88) Rate of Quitting Losses 9.4% (113) . Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 81.9% (116) . Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (100) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.1% ( 6) . ... . 314002838 Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 355, "image": "rzbj0037_9.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "9" }
173
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the source", "role": "user" }, { "content": "USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data", "role": "assistant" } ]
418
The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?
314002838
Page 9 Consumer Dynamics CARLTON index . Retention of Franchise: 81.3% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 9.3% ( 88) Rate of Quitting Losses 9.4% (113) . Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 81.9% (116) . Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 1.7% (100) Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0.1% ( 6) . ... . 314002838 Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 355, "image": "rzbj0037_9.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "9" }
168
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "314002838", "role": "assistant" } ]
419
Heading of the document
Domestic Product Development (cont'd.)
Page 3 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Marlboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 2022155853 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 298, "image": "khxj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
445
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Domestic Product Development (cont'd.)", "role": "assistant" } ]
420
what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel
80mm and 83mm
Page 3 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Marlboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 2022155853 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 298, "image": "khxj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
453
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel", "role": "user" }, { "content": "80mm and 83mm", "role": "assistant" } ]
421
Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?
evaluation of lip release
Page 3 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Marlboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 2022155853 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 298, "image": "khxj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
453
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "evaluation of lip release", "role": "assistant" } ]
422
Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks
next 2-3 weeks
Page 3 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Project Marlboro - POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical. - POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I. - Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for analytical testing. - POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed. Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks. Marlboro Menthol Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel. After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks. Bucks Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done on these prototypes. Miscellaneous Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for evaluation of lip release. Competitive Testing HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90. POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production sample has been submitted for analytical testing. POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status. 3 2022155853 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 298, "image": "khxj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
459
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks", "role": "user" }, { "content": "next 2-3 weeks", "role": "assistant" } ]
424
Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date
6/7/90
Page 2 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 2022155852 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 299, "image": "khxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
507
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nMenthol\nPOL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL\n0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg\ntar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)\nclose out on June 7, 1990.\nBest of the Lowest\nBOLD\nPrimary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing\nwith a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The\ntest is scheduled in make/pack next week\nAmbrosia I\nPOL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned\nfor around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.\nAmbrosia II\nThe 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have\nbeen completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270\nhave also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm\nmenthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.\nCigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs\nduring the week of June 11.\nDuring the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed\nto have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by\nbuildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and\nprevent this occurrence.\n2\n2022155852\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date", "role": "user" }, { "content": "6/7/90", "role": "assistant" } ]
426
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper
Cigarette paper
Page 2 DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.) Menthol POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL 0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff) close out on June 7, 1990. Best of the Lowest BOLD Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The test is scheduled in make/pack next week Ambrosia I POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering. Ambrosia II The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have been completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270 have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation. Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs during the week of June 11. During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and prevent this occurrence. 2 2022155852 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 299, "image": "khxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
512
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nMenthol\nPOL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL\n0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg\ntar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)\nclose out on June 7, 1990.\nBest of the Lowest\nBOLD\nPrimary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing\nwith a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The\ntest is scheduled in make/pack next week\nAmbrosia I\nPOL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned\nfor around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.\nAmbrosia II\nThe 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have\nbeen completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270\nhave also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm\nmenthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.\nCigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs\nduring the week of June 11.\nDuring the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed\nto have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by\nbuildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and\nprevent this occurrence.\n2\n2022155852\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Cigarette paper", "role": "assistant" } ]
434
Heading of the document?
Memorandum
Page 1 . ' . . -7 In 22. BY * se , up MEMORANDUM TO : From : Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt Subject: A. J. Baker The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional, oversimplification. is probably an At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke (Southampton ) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion. distinctly different from the This mechanism appears "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494 501102013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 303, "image": "nmcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
593
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Memorandum", "role": "assistant" } ]
435
Where was the conference held?
B&W headquarters
Page 1 . ' . . -7 In 22. BY * se , up MEMORANDUM TO : From : Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt Subject: A. J. Baker The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional, oversimplification. is probably an At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke (Southampton ) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion. distinctly different from the This mechanism appears "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494 501102013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 303, "image": "nmcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
594
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: Where was the conference held?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B&W headquarters", "role": "assistant" } ]
437
How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?
At least two
Page 1 . ' . . -7 In 22. BY * se , up MEMORANDUM TO : From : Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt Subject: A. J. Baker The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional, oversimplification. is probably an At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke (Southampton ) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion. distinctly different from the This mechanism appears "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494 501102013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 303, "image": "nmcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
611
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "At least two", "role": "assistant" } ]
438
One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.
Page 1 . ' . . -7 In 22. BY * se , up MEMORANDUM TO : From : Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt Subject: A. J. Baker The Aerodynamics of Swirl Date: October 1, 1984 SUMMARY The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters, brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue. DISCUSSION 1. The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the oral cavity. The data on the desirability of one specific configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive. Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs. 2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize all flows that are not unidirectional, oversimplification. is probably an At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod), the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke (Southampton ) for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion. distinctly different from the This mechanism appears "Actron" flowfield, although both indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics. 3. I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494 501102013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 303, "image": "nmcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
606
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.", "role": "assistant" } ]
442
What is the full form of PUF?
POLYURETHANE FOAM
Page 2 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors -2- 2022155945 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 312, "image": "qhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
807
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of PUF?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "POLYURETHANE FOAM", "role": "assistant" } ]
443
Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?
nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.
Page 2 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors -2- 2022155945 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 312, "image": "qhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
809
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.", "role": "assistant" } ]
446
What is the full form of POVC?
POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS
Page 2 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors -2- 2022155945 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 312, "image": "qhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
808
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of POVC?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS", "role": "assistant" } ]
447
Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?
D. J. EATOUGH
Page 2 with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota) experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne) showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T. Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover pesticides in high yield. DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds. The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water. Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds, e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons. J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 - 70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system. Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms capability for identification of unknown. NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors -2- 2022155945 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 312, "image": "qhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
811
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "D. J. EATOUGH", "role": "assistant" } ]
453
What is the slope mentioned in the first table?
0.1088102E+01
Page 9 WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 14 ;259-279 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S. D. 0 . 0000 150. 164. 174. 162.7 12. 1 25 .0000 157. 181. 186. 174.7 15.5 50 . 0000 181. 191. 191. 187.7 5 .8 75.0000 224. 224. 244. 230.7 11.5 100 . 0000 256. 261. 252. 256.3 4.5 125.0000 297. 316. 299. 304.0 10.4 250.0000 382. 359 . 388. 376.3 15.3 SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01 1088 Rusing the 6 disse CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 15 ;280-300 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S. D. 0.0000 145. 152. 149. 148.7 3.5 25.0000 174. 154. 160 162.7 10.3 50.000 187. 196. 202. 195.0 7 .5 75 . 0000 202. 219. 215. 212.0 8.9 100 . 0000 205. 218. 241. 221.3 18.2 125 . 0000 267. 275. 276. 272.7 4.9 250 . 0000 306. 274. 312. 297.3 20.4 SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00 918 Reims for ledoges WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 1 ; 301-321 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0. 0000 135. 127. 148. 136.7 10. 6 25.0000 155. 155. 170. 160.0 8 . 7 50. 0000 190. 190. 164. 181.3 15.0 75 . 0000 183. 202. 193 192.7 9.5 100 .0000 226. 263. 250. 246.3 18.8 125 .0000 293. 276. 271. 280.0 11.5 250 . 0000 337. 399. 380. 372.0 31.8 SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01 10 94 Revimp for 51003 0975 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 313, "image": "hgbl0037_9.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "9" }
741
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the slope mentioned in the first table?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0.1088102E+01", "role": "assistant" } ]
455
What is the date mentioned in the second table?
05-12-92
Page 9 WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 14 ;259-279 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S. D. 0 . 0000 150. 164. 174. 162.7 12. 1 25 .0000 157. 181. 186. 174.7 15.5 50 . 0000 181. 191. 191. 187.7 5 .8 75.0000 224. 224. 244. 230.7 11.5 100 . 0000 256. 261. 252. 256.3 4.5 125.0000 297. 316. 299. 304.0 10.4 250.0000 382. 359 . 388. 376.3 15.3 SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01 1088 Rusing the 6 disse CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 15 ;280-300 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S. D. 0.0000 145. 152. 149. 148.7 3.5 25.0000 174. 154. 160 162.7 10.3 50.000 187. 196. 202. 195.0 7 .5 75 . 0000 202. 219. 215. 212.0 8.9 100 . 0000 205. 218. 241. 221.3 18.2 125 . 0000 267. 275. 276. 272.7 4.9 250 . 0000 306. 274. 312. 297.3 20.4 SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00 918 Reims for ledoges WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 1 ; 301-321 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0. 0000 135. 127. 148. 136.7 10. 6 25.0000 155. 155. 170. 160.0 8 . 7 50. 0000 190. 190. 164. 181.3 15.0 75 . 0000 183. 202. 193 192.7 9.5 100 .0000 226. 263. 250. 246.3 18.8 125 .0000 293. 276. 271. 280.0 11.5 250 . 0000 337. 399. 380. 372.0 31.8 SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01 10 94 Revimp for 51003 0975 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 313, "image": "hgbl0037_9.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "9" }
738
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the second table?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "05-12-92", "role": "assistant" } ]
456
What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?
10.6
Page 9 WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 14 ;259-279 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S. D. 0 . 0000 150. 164. 174. 162.7 12. 1 25 .0000 157. 181. 186. 174.7 15.5 50 . 0000 181. 191. 191. 187.7 5 .8 75.0000 224. 224. 244. 230.7 11.5 100 . 0000 256. 261. 252. 256.3 4.5 125.0000 297. 316. 299. 304.0 10.4 250.0000 382. 359 . 388. 376.3 15.3 SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01 1088 Rusing the 6 disse CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 15 ;280-300 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S. D. 0.0000 145. 152. 149. 148.7 3.5 25.0000 174. 154. 160 162.7 10.3 50.000 187. 196. 202. 195.0 7 .5 75 . 0000 202. 219. 215. 212.0 8.9 100 . 0000 205. 218. 241. 221.3 18.2 125 . 0000 267. 275. 276. 272.7 4.9 250 . 0000 306. 274. 312. 297.3 20.4 SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00 918 Reims for ledoges WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92 SET # 1 ; 301-321 DOSE-ug PLATE COUNTS MEAN S.D. 0. 0000 135. 127. 148. 136.7 10. 6 25.0000 155. 155. 170. 160.0 8 . 7 50. 0000 190. 190. 164. 181.3 15.0 75 . 0000 183. 202. 193 192.7 9.5 100 .0000 226. 263. 250. 246.3 18.8 125 .0000 293. 276. 271. 280.0 11.5 250 . 0000 337. 399. 380. 372.0 31.8 SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01 10 94 Revimp for 51003 0975 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 313, "image": "hgbl0037_9.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "9" }
749
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "10.6", "role": "assistant" } ]
460
Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?
University of Maine
Page 2 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m' paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a - 2 - 2022155887 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 315, "image": "nhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
711
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "University of Maine", "role": "assistant" } ]
465
Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?
091
Page 2 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m' paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a - 2 - 2022155887 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 315, "image": "nhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
724
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "091", "role": "assistant" } ]
466
which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette
low smoke cigarette
Page 5 unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full circumference cigarette--a product of the future. When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed. VSSS Circumference These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique, novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner. Smoke Odor The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS, forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS. 2022156005 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 354, "image": "fxxj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
561
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette", "role": "user" }, { "content": "low smoke cigarette", "role": "assistant" } ]
467
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?
high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate
Page 2 The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler. The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m' paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek 245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors will also be carried out. A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of 30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes. Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system. A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable. Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables. In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a - 2 - 2022155887 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 315, "image": "nhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
733
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate", "role": "assistant" } ]
468
How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS
Over Fifty percent
Page 5 unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full circumference cigarette--a product of the future. When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed. VSSS Circumference These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique, novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner. Smoke Odor The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS, forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS. 2022156005 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 354, "image": "fxxj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
565
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Over Fifty percent", "role": "assistant" } ]
469
who were bothered by cigarette odors
Nonsmokers
Page 5 unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full circumference cigarette--a product of the future. When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed. VSSS Circumference These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique, novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner. Smoke Odor The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS, forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS. 2022156005 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 354, "image": "fxxj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
558
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: who were bothered by cigarette odors", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Nonsmokers", "role": "assistant" } ]
478
What is the heading of first table?
Slim Cigarettes
Page 4 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name RIP-6 RIP-4 More White Lts 120 61/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 INI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 41/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code RIP-6(W/0 Filter) RIP-6(W/Filter) P4049 -99 (5C) 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A (7C) 11/5SE 6SE 2. 5% AlC13 on GPC 31/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 317, "image": "rncj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
279
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of first table?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Slim Cigarettes", "role": "assistant" } ]
479
What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?
6I/6
Page 4 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name RIP-6 RIP-4 More White Lts 120 61/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 INI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 41/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code RIP-6(W/0 Filter) RIP-6(W/Filter) P4049 -99 (5C) 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A (7C) 11/5SE 6SE 2. 5% AlC13 on GPC 31/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 317, "image": "rncj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
282
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "6I/6", "role": "assistant" } ]
480
What is the heading of second table
K. C. Cigarettes
Page 4 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name RIP-6 RIP-4 More White Lts 120 61/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 INI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 41/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code RIP-6(W/0 Filter) RIP-6(W/Filter) P4049 -99 (5C) 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A (7C) 11/5SE 6SE 2. 5% AlC13 on GPC 31/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 317, "image": "rncj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
281
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of second table", "role": "user" }, { "content": "K. C. Cigarettes", "role": "assistant" } ]
481
What is the cigarette code of RIP-6(W/O Filter) 21/4SE
P4049-99(5C)
Page 4 SLIM CIGARETTES Cigarette Name RIP-6 RIP-4 More White Lts 120 61/6 6SE/6 SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown 61/6 3NI/3SE Stixs 61/6 21/3NI/1SE CAPRI 51/3NI 2NI/4SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Box 61/6 INI/5SE Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box 51/1SE 6SE/6 GPC 61/6 41/1NI/1SE KOOL KS 61/6 41/1NI/1SE K. C. CIGARETTES Cigarette Code RIP-6(W/0 Filter) RIP-6(W/Filter) P4049 -99 (5C) 21/4SE 6SE P4049-99A (7C) 11/5SE 6SE 2. 5% AlC13 on GPC 31/3SE 584100576 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 317, "image": "rncj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
294
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the cigarette code of RIP-6(W/O Filter) 21/4SE", "role": "user" }, { "content": "P4049-99(5C)", "role": "assistant" } ]
482
What is the name of the corporation?
brown & Williamson tobacco corporation
Page 1 2 why today B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT MEETING REPORT SUBJECT : Reduced Ignition Propensity/498 PRESENT : A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994 ISSUE DATE: January 25, 1994 CC: Attendees, T. F. Riehl The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items from the January 10th meeting. . Lee Chao 1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In progress 2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done. 3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6 testing - Done (see attached results). 4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial results attached) . 5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress. 6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress. 7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress (preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~ approval needed) . . Kelley St. Charles 1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta getting data ready to be sent. 584100570 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 318, "image": "qncj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
396
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n2 why today\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\nMEETING REPORT\nSUBJECT :\nReduced Ignition Propensity/498\nPRESENT :\nA. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles\nL. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman\nMEETING DATE: January 24, 1994\nISSUE DATE:\nJanuary 25, 1994\nCC:\nAttendees, T. F. Riehl\nThe purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items\nfrom the January 10th meeting.\n. Lee Chao\n1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In\nprogress\n2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.\n3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6\ntesting - Done (see attached results).\n4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial\nresults attached) .\n5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.\n6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.\n7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress\n(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~\napproval needed) .\n. Kelley St. Charles\n1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta\ngetting data ready to be sent.\n584100570\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the corporation?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "brown & Williamson tobacco corporation", "role": "assistant" } ]
483
What is the subject?
reduced ignition propensity/498
Page 1 2 why today B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT MEETING REPORT SUBJECT : Reduced Ignition Propensity/498 PRESENT : A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994 ISSUE DATE: January 25, 1994 CC: Attendees, T. F. Riehl The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items from the January 10th meeting. . Lee Chao 1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In progress 2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done. 3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6 testing - Done (see attached results). 4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial results attached) . 5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress. 6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress. 7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress (preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~ approval needed) . . Kelley St. Charles 1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta getting data ready to be sent. 584100570 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 318, "image": "qncj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
394
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n2 why today\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\nMEETING REPORT\nSUBJECT :\nReduced Ignition Propensity/498\nPRESENT :\nA. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles\nL. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman\nMEETING DATE: January 24, 1994\nISSUE DATE:\nJanuary 25, 1994\nCC:\nAttendees, T. F. Riehl\nThe purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items\nfrom the January 10th meeting.\n. Lee Chao\n1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In\nprogress\n2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.\n3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6\ntesting - Done (see attached results).\n4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial\nresults attached) .\n5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.\n6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.\n7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress\n(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~\napproval needed) .\n. Kelley St. Charles\n1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta\ngetting data ready to be sent.\n584100570\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "reduced ignition propensity/498", "role": "assistant" } ]
484
What is the meeting date?
January 24, 1994
Page 1 2 why today B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT MEETING REPORT SUBJECT : Reduced Ignition Propensity/498 PRESENT : A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994 ISSUE DATE: January 25, 1994 CC: Attendees, T. F. Riehl The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items from the January 10th meeting. . Lee Chao 1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In progress 2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done. 3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6 testing - Done (see attached results). 4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial results attached) . 5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress. 6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress. 7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress (preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~ approval needed) . . Kelley St. Charles 1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta getting data ready to be sent. 584100570 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 318, "image": "qncj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
396
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\n2 why today\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\nMEETING REPORT\nSUBJECT :\nReduced Ignition Propensity/498\nPRESENT :\nA. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles\nL. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman\nMEETING DATE: January 24, 1994\nISSUE DATE:\nJanuary 25, 1994\nCC:\nAttendees, T. F. Riehl\nThe purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items\nfrom the January 10th meeting.\n. Lee Chao\n1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In\nprogress\n2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.\n3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6\ntesting - Done (see attached results).\n4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial\nresults attached) .\n5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.\n6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.\n7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress\n(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~\napproval needed) .\n. Kelley St. Charles\n1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta\ngetting data ready to be sent.\n584100570\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the meeting date?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "January 24, 1994", "role": "assistant" } ]
486
How many one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th?
forty
Page 2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th The participants were screened for the following requirements: Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke odor Packaging 2022156002 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 319, "image": "fxxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
301
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "forty", "role": "assistant" } ]
487
According to the listed requirements , what must be the age group of female smokers?
between the ages of 18 and 55
Page 2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th The participants were screened for the following requirements: Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke odor Packaging 2022156002 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 319, "image": "fxxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
303
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: According to the listed requirements , what must be the age group of female smokers?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "between the ages of 18 and 55", "role": "assistant" } ]
488
According to the requirements what is the minimum required consumption of a regular brand?
1/2 pack
Page 2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th The participants were screened for the following requirements: Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke odor Packaging 2022156002 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 319, "image": "fxxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
297
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: According to the requirements what is the minimum required consumption of a regular brand?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1/2 pack", "role": "assistant" } ]
489
How many focus groups were held?
Two
Page 2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th The participants were screened for the following requirements: Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke odor Packaging 2022156002 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 319, "image": "fxxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
286
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many focus groups were held?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Two", "role": "assistant" } ]
490
Which interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in groups?
The one-on-one
Page 2 METHOD Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston, Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th The participants were screened for the following requirements: Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55 Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra low delivery cigarettes Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS PROCEDURE Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in the groups. The major topics covered included: Initial introduction Recall of advertising Continuing to smoke VSSS Purpose of product Likes/dislikes Suggestions for improvement Low visible smoke VSSS circumference Smoke odor Packaging 2022156002 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 319, "image": "fxxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
298
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in groups?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The one-on-one", "role": "assistant" } ]
491
What is the Best Prototype mentioned?
327391
Page 5 CUT TOBACCO: MT -768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS : FLUE CURED . . . . 3. 681. 7 3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY . 1 , 996.3 3 , 221.5 ( 1, 746.8 ) + CASING ( S ) . . . . . 2, 159.0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL . . . . . 1 , 243 . 4 1, 088.0 1, 280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED . . 2, 321.7 2, 031 .5 2, 390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS. 9 , 243 . 1 8, 500.0 10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12. 5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F . . . . . . 913. 1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F . . . . . . 1, 311. 4 1 , 147.5 1, 350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 .T2F T2F . . . . . . . 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR . . . 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR . . . . 291. 1 254. 7 299.7 874. 3 765.0 900. 0 65 EBRC EBR . . . . . . . . . . . 1 , 350.3 1, 181.5 1, 390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL . . . 971 . 4 850. 0 1, 000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB . . . 207 .6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB . . . 414. 1 426 .2 UAB . 207 .6 362.3 181.7 213.8 YAB . . 414.1 362.3 426 . 2 1 , 243 . 4 1 , 088. 0 1 , 280.0 977 BEST MT-778 . . . . ; + CASING (S ) . . . . . 1 , 996 . 4 ( 1, 746.8 ) 2, 159. 0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 321, "image": "lycj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
703
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Best Prototype mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "327391", "role": "assistant" } ]
492
What is the BLEND mentioned?
bw-6071
Page 5 CUT TOBACCO: MT -768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS : FLUE CURED . . . . 3. 681. 7 3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY . 1 , 996.3 3 , 221.5 ( 1, 746.8 ) + CASING ( S ) . . . . . 2, 159.0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL . . . . . 1 , 243 . 4 1, 088.0 1, 280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED . . 2, 321.7 2, 031 .5 2, 390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS. 9 , 243 . 1 8, 500.0 10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12. 5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F . . . . . . 913. 1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F . . . . . . 1, 311. 4 1 , 147.5 1, 350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 .T2F T2F . . . . . . . 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR . . . 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR . . . . 291. 1 254. 7 299.7 874. 3 765.0 900. 0 65 EBRC EBR . . . . . . . . . . . 1 , 350.3 1, 181.5 1, 390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL . . . 971 . 4 850. 0 1, 000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB . . . 207 .6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB . . . 414. 1 426 .2 UAB . 207 .6 362.3 181.7 213.8 YAB . . 414.1 362.3 426 . 2 1 , 243 . 4 1 , 088. 0 1 , 280.0 977 BEST MT-778 . . . . ; + CASING (S ) . . . . . 1 , 996 . 4 ( 1, 746.8 ) 2, 159. 0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 321, "image": "lycj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
705
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the BLEND mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bw-6071", "role": "assistant" } ]
493
What is the LBS AT TARGET of TOTAL STRIPS?
10,000.0 @ 15.0 %
Page 5 CUT TOBACCO: MT -768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS : FLUE CURED . . . . 3. 681. 7 3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY . 1 , 996.3 3 , 221.5 ( 1, 746.8 ) + CASING ( S ) . . . . . 2, 159.0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL . . . . . 1 , 243 . 4 1, 088.0 1, 280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED . . 2, 321.7 2, 031 .5 2, 390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS. 9 , 243 . 1 8, 500.0 10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12. 5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F . . . . . . 913. 1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F . . . . . . 1, 311. 4 1 , 147.5 1, 350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 .T2F T2F . . . . . . . 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR . . . 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR . . . . 291. 1 254. 7 299.7 874. 3 765.0 900. 0 65 EBRC EBR . . . . . . . . . . . 1 , 350.3 1, 181.5 1, 390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL . . . 971 . 4 850. 0 1, 000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB . . . 207 .6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB . . . 414. 1 426 .2 UAB . 207 .6 362.3 181.7 213.8 YAB . . 414.1 362.3 426 . 2 1 , 243 . 4 1 , 088. 0 1 , 280.0 977 BEST MT-778 . . . . ; + CASING (S ) . . . . . 1 , 996 . 4 ( 1, 746.8 ) 2, 159. 0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 321, "image": "lycj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
717
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the LBS AT TARGET of TOTAL STRIPS?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "10,000.0 @ 15.0 %", "role": "assistant" } ]
494
What is the SOLID LBS of T2F GRADE?
510.0
Page 5 CUT TOBACCO: MT -768 D BST391 BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391 BLEND : BW-6071 LBS AT 12.5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET STRIPS : FLUE CURED . . . . 3. 681. 7 3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 % BURLEY . 1 , 996.3 3 , 221.5 ( 1, 746.8 ) + CASING ( S ) . . . . . 2, 159.0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % ORIENTAL . . . . . 1 , 243 . 4 1, 088.0 1, 280.0 @ 15.0 % RECONSTITUTED . . 2, 321.7 2, 031 .5 2, 390.0 @ 15.0 % TOTAL STRIPS. 9 , 243 . 1 8, 500.0 10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 % GRADE BIN GRADE LBS AT 12. 5 % SOLID LBS LBS AT TARGET 1 C2F C2F . . . . . . 913. 1 799.0 940.0 @ 15.0 % 3 L2F L2F . . . . . . 1, 311. 4 1 , 147.5 1, 350.0 @ 15.0 % 5 .T2F T2F . . . . . . . 582.9 510.0 600.0 @ 15.0 % 7 L2FR L2FR . . . 583.2 510.3 600.3 @ 15.0 % T2FR . . . . 291. 1 254. 7 299.7 874. 3 765.0 900. 0 65 EBRC EBR . . . . . . . . . . . 1 , 350.3 1, 181.5 1, 390.0 @ 15.0 % 70 CPCLF CPCL . . . 971 . 4 850. 0 1, 000.0 @ 15.0 % 73 AOB3 CAB . . . 207 .6 181.7 213.8 @ 15.0 % TAB . . . 414. 1 426 .2 UAB . 207 .6 362.3 181.7 213.8 YAB . . 414.1 362.3 426 . 2 1 , 243 . 4 1 , 088. 0 1 , 280.0 977 BEST MT-778 . . . . ; + CASING (S ) . . . . . 1 , 996 . 4 ( 1, 746.8 ) 2, 159. 0 2, 540.0 @ 15.0 % 583232685 Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 321, "image": "lycj0037_5.png", "ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "5" }
711
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the SOLID LBS of T2F GRADE?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "510.0", "role": "assistant" } ]
496
What is the title of the letter?
interoffice memorandum
Page 1 R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC 51545 1013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
1
{ "doc_id": 322, "image": "mpcl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
352
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "interoffice memorandum", "role": "assistant" } ]
498
To whom is this letter addressed?
mr. roger jennings
Page 1 R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC 51545 1013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
1
{ "doc_id": 322, "image": "mpcl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
355
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: To whom is this letter addressed?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "mr. roger jennings", "role": "assistant" } ]
499
What is the subject of the letter?
effect of chemical stimulation on the perception of draw
Page 1 R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC 51545 1013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
1
{ "doc_id": 322, "image": "mpcl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
358
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the letter?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "effect of chemical stimulation on the perception of draw", "role": "assistant" } ]
500
What is the PROPOSAL NO.?
r9044
Page 1 R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC 51545 1013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
1
{ "doc_id": 322, "image": "mpcl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
352
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: What is the PROPOSAL NO.?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "r9044", "role": "assistant" } ]
501
When did the Human Research Committee meet to consider the proposal?
November 27, 1990
Page 1 R9044.90W Page 1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: <Date> TO: Mr. Roger Jennings FROM: J. H. Reynolds SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw PROPOSAL NO. R9044 The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is approved, subject to the following modifications: The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should not always be at the left and right of the subjects. In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list" approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc. In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants. Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you. If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number above in communications regarding this proposal. John H. Reynolds, Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC 51545 1013 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
1
{ "doc_id": 322, "image": "mpcl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
360
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: When did the Human Research Committee meet to consider the proposal?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "November 27, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]
502
For what does the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for?
Cork-on-white tipping
Page 2 loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for cork-on-white tipping. A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2. Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter. The 8: flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8 g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate. To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 18 flare-up. Conclusions and Recommendations From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction; (2) low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into the filter; (3) burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related to high ink weight on the tipping. We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be maintained below 3.5 g/m' . cc : S. Cline J. Griffin D. Sealey G. Carter B. Hendricks T. Sanders J. Easley J. Myracle E. Weston P. Gauvin B. Peace Central Files -2- 2022155810 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 323, "image": "xhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
595
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: For what does the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Cork-on-white tipping", "role": "assistant" } ]
506
When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, what had 5% flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 1% flare-up?
the standard Ink tipping
Page 2 loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for cork-on-white tipping. A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2. Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter. The 8: flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8 g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate. To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 18 flare-up. Conclusions and Recommendations From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction; (2) low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into the filter; (3) burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related to high ink weight on the tipping. We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be maintained below 3.5 g/m' . cc : S. Cline J. Griffin D. Sealey G. Carter B. Hendricks T. Sanders J. Easley J. Myracle E. Weston P. Gauvin B. Peace Central Files -2- 2022155810 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 323, "image": "xhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
610
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, what had 5% flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 1% flare-up?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "the standard Ink tipping", "role": "assistant" } ]
507
Which inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates?
low silicate inks
Page 2 loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for cork-on-white tipping. A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2. Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter. The 8: flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8 g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate. To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 18 flare-up. Conclusions and Recommendations From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction; (2) low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into the filter; (3) burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related to high ink weight on the tipping. We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be maintained below 3.5 g/m' . cc : S. Cline J. Griffin D. Sealey G. Carter B. Hendricks T. Sanders J. Easley J. Myracle E. Weston P. Gauvin B. Peace Central Files -2- 2022155810 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 323, "image": "xhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
592
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "low silicate inks", "role": "assistant" } ]
508
What is the 10 digits number written bold on the paper?
2022155810
Page 2 loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for cork-on-white tipping. A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2. Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter. The 8: flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8 g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate. To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 18 flare-up. Conclusions and Recommendations From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can draw the following conclusions: (1) filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction; (2) low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into the filter; (3) burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related to high ink weight on the tipping. We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be maintained below 3.5 g/m' . cc : S. Cline J. Griffin D. Sealey G. Carter B. Hendricks T. Sanders J. Easley J. Myracle E. Weston P. Gauvin B. Peace Central Files -2- 2022155810 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 323, "image": "xhxj0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
593
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 10 digits number written bold on the paper?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2022155810", "role": "assistant" } ]
510
What is the name of the tobacco company?
RJ Reynolds
Page 1 RLB By Reynolds Interoffice Memorandum RJR Subject: Monthly Highlights - June SECRET Date: June 18, 1992 ADDREGGIE ONLY To: J. D. Phillips No. 515 By. From: M. D. Shannon PROJECT XC: CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter: Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and 1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at 98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de- activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out to eighteen weeks for further evaluation. Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT): Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics. Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box- Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects, quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69, 79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from 51210 9589 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
1
{ "doc_id": 325, "image": "qqbl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
699
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the tobacco company?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "RJ Reynolds", "role": "assistant" } ]
511
who is this Interoffice Memorandum addressed to?
J. D. Phillips
Page 1 RLB By Reynolds Interoffice Memorandum RJR Subject: Monthly Highlights - June SECRET Date: June 18, 1992 ADDREGGIE ONLY To: J. D. Phillips No. 515 By. From: M. D. Shannon PROJECT XC: CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter: Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and 1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at 98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de- activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out to eighteen weeks for further evaluation. Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT): Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics. Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box- Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects, quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69, 79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from 51210 9589 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
1
{ "doc_id": 325, "image": "qqbl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
702
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: who is this Interoffice Memorandum addressed to?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "J. D. Phillips", "role": "assistant" } ]
512
What is the date mentioned?
June 18, 1992
Page 1 RLB By Reynolds Interoffice Memorandum RJR Subject: Monthly Highlights - June SECRET Date: June 18, 1992 ADDREGGIE ONLY To: J. D. Phillips No. 515 By. From: M. D. Shannon PROJECT XC: CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter: Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and 1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at 98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de- activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out to eighteen weeks for further evaluation. Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT): Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics. Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box- Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects, quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69, 79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from 51210 9589 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
1
{ "doc_id": 325, "image": "qqbl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
700
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "June 18, 1992", "role": "assistant" } ]
513
What is the title of the second paragraph?
even puff-by-puff filter development (eppcat)
Page 1 RLB By Reynolds Interoffice Memorandum RJR Subject: Monthly Highlights - June SECRET Date: June 18, 1992 ADDREGGIE ONLY To: J. D. Phillips No. 515 By. From: M. D. Shannon PROJECT XC: CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter: Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and 1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at 98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de- activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out to eighteen weeks for further evaluation. Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT): Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics. Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box- Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects, quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69, 79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from 51210 9589 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
1
{ "doc_id": 325, "image": "qqbl0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
708
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the second paragraph?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "even puff-by-puff filter development (eppcat)", "role": "assistant" } ]
516
What is the name of the company?
B&W
Page 4 Consumer Dynamics B&W VICEROY . . index . Retention of Franchise: 81.2% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 12.8% (121) Rate of Quitting Losses 6.0% ( 72) . Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 69.6% ( 99) . Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 0.7% ( 86) . Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0% ( - ) 314002833 Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 326, "image": "rzbj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
165
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nVICEROY\n. .\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.2%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n12.8%\n(121)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n6.0%\n( 72)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n69.6%\n( 99)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n0.7%\n( 86)\n. Share of the 21-25 Segment:\n0%\n( - )\n314002833\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the company?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B&W", "role": "assistant" } ]
517
What is the share of the 21-25 segment mentioned?
0%
Page 4 Consumer Dynamics B&W VICEROY . . index . Retention of Franchise: 81.2% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 12.8% (121) Rate of Quitting Losses 6.0% ( 72) . Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 69.6% ( 99) . Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 0.7% ( 86) . Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0% ( - ) 314002833 Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 326, "image": "rzbj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
170
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nVICEROY\n. .\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.2%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n12.8%\n(121)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n6.0%\n( 72)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n69.6%\n( 99)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n0.7%\n( 86)\n. Share of the 21-25 Segment:\n0%\n( - )\n314002833\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the share of the 21-25 segment mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0%", "role": "assistant" } ]
518
What is the index value for Retention of Franchise ?
(100)
Page 4 Consumer Dynamics B&W VICEROY . . index . Retention of Franchise: 81.2% (100) Rate of Switching Losses 12.8% (121) Rate of Quitting Losses 6.0% ( 72) . Single Brand Users in the Franchise: 69.6% ( 99) . Share of Industry Switchers Gained: 0.7% ( 86) . Share of the 21-25 Segment: 0% ( - ) 314002833 Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 326, "image": "rzbj0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
170
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nVICEROY\n. .\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.2%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n12.8%\n(121)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n6.0%\n( 72)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n69.6%\n( 99)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n0.7%\n( 86)\n. Share of the 21-25 Segment:\n0%\n( - )\n314002833\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the index value for Retention of Franchise ?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "(100)", "role": "assistant" } ]
520
What is the date mentioned?
December 20, 1993
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON FAX CORRESPONDENCE FAX NO. 502-568-8335 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 1993 TO P. S. WESSEL CC: T. E. WHITEHAIR, JR. N. W. KREMER D. J. DANT T. F. RIEHL D. FRANK M. R. TAYLOR P. A. HAYDON W. L. TELLING J. L. HENDRICKS J. D. TONGE FROM: J. T. WINEBRENNER SUBJECT: TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES Tom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on packs in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line with TIOJ measures By copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the "next steps" noted in your November 24 memo. Regards, J. T. W. Atc 6709-44526 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 327, "image": "klcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "klcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
290
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON\nFAX CORRESPONDENCE\nFAX NO. 502-568-8335\nDATE:\nDECEMBER 20, 1993\nTO\nP. S. WESSEL\nCC:\nT. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.\nN. W. KREMER\nD. J. DANT\nT. F. RIEHL\nD. FRANK\nM. R. TAYLOR\nP. A. HAYDON\nW. L. TELLING\nJ. L. HENDRICKS\nJ. D. TONGE\nFROM:\nJ. T. WINEBRENNER\nSUBJECT:\nTAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES\nTom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on\npacks in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line\nwith TIOJ measures\nBy copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the \"next\nsteps\" noted in your November 24 memo.\nRegards,\nJ. T. W.\nAtc\n6709-44526\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "December 20, 1993", "role": "assistant" } ]
522
What is the subject of the email?
TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON FAX CORRESPONDENCE FAX NO. 502-568-8335 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 1993 TO P. S. WESSEL CC: T. E. WHITEHAIR, JR. N. W. KREMER D. J. DANT T. F. RIEHL D. FRANK M. R. TAYLOR P. A. HAYDON W. L. TELLING J. L. HENDRICKS J. D. TONGE FROM: J. T. WINEBRENNER SUBJECT: TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES Tom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on packs in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line with TIOJ measures By copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the "next steps" noted in your November 24 memo. Regards, J. T. W. Atc 6709-44526 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 327, "image": "klcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "klcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
294
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON\nFAX CORRESPONDENCE\nFAX NO. 502-568-8335\nDATE:\nDECEMBER 20, 1993\nTO\nP. S. WESSEL\nCC:\nT. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.\nN. W. KREMER\nD. J. DANT\nT. F. RIEHL\nD. FRANK\nM. R. TAYLOR\nP. A. HAYDON\nW. L. TELLING\nJ. L. HENDRICKS\nJ. D. TONGE\nFROM:\nJ. T. WINEBRENNER\nSUBJECT:\nTAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES\nTom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on\npacks in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line\nwith TIOJ measures\nBy copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the \"next\nsteps\" noted in your November 24 memo.\nRegards,\nJ. T. W.\nAtc\n6709-44526\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the email?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES", "role": "assistant" } ]
523
What is the name of the person in the "FROM" field?
J. T. WINEBRENNER
Page 1 B&W BROWN & WILLIAMSON FAX CORRESPONDENCE FAX NO. 502-568-8335 DATE: DECEMBER 20, 1993 TO P. S. WESSEL CC: T. E. WHITEHAIR, JR. N. W. KREMER D. J. DANT T. F. RIEHL D. FRANK M. R. TAYLOR P. A. HAYDON W. L. TELLING J. L. HENDRICKS J. D. TONGE FROM: J. T. WINEBRENNER SUBJECT: TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES Tom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on packs in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line with TIOJ measures By copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the "next steps" noted in your November 24 memo. Regards, J. T. W. Atc 6709-44526 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 327, "image": "klcj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "klcj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
301
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON\nFAX CORRESPONDENCE\nFAX NO. 502-568-8335\nDATE:\nDECEMBER 20, 1993\nTO\nP. S. WESSEL\nCC:\nT. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.\nN. W. KREMER\nD. J. DANT\nT. F. RIEHL\nD. FRANK\nM. R. TAYLOR\nP. A. HAYDON\nW. L. TELLING\nJ. L. HENDRICKS\nJ. D. TONGE\nFROM:\nJ. T. WINEBRENNER\nSUBJECT:\nTAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES\nTom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on\npacks in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line\nwith TIOJ measures\nBy copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the \"next\nsteps\" noted in your November 24 memo.\nRegards,\nJ. T. W.\nAtc\n6709-44526\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the person in the \"FROM\" field?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "J. T. WINEBRENNER", "role": "assistant" } ]
525
What is the Ecusta of Cig. Code 498062 mentioned in RIP-6?
6I/6
Page 3 RIP - 6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 41/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 41/6 61/6 498060 51/6 51/6 498061 51/6 61/6 498062 61/6 61/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 11/5SE 31/INI/2SE 498058 11/SSE 11/INI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE INI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 341, "image": "rncj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
227
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nRIP - 6\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n41/6\n61/6\n498058\n61/6\n51/6\n498059\n41/6\n61/6\n498060\n51/6\n51/6\n498061\n51/6\n61/6\n498062\n61/6\n61/6\nRIP-4\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n11/5SE\n31/INI/2SE\n498058\n11/SSE\n11/INI/4SE\n498059\n6SE\n6NI\n498060\n6SE\n2NI/4SE\n498061\n6SE\nINI/5SE\n498062\n6SE\n4NI/2SE\n584100575\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Ecusta of Cig. Code 498062 mentioned in RIP-6?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "6I/6", "role": "assistant" } ]
526
What is the 9 digits number mentioned in bold?
584100575
Page 3 RIP - 6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 41/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 41/6 61/6 498060 51/6 51/6 498061 51/6 61/6 498062 61/6 61/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 11/5SE 31/INI/2SE 498058 11/SSE 11/INI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE INI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 341, "image": "rncj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
218
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nRIP - 6\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n41/6\n61/6\n498058\n61/6\n51/6\n498059\n41/6\n61/6\n498060\n51/6\n51/6\n498061\n51/6\n61/6\n498062\n61/6\n61/6\nRIP-4\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n11/5SE\n31/INI/2SE\n498058\n11/SSE\n11/INI/4SE\n498059\n6SE\n6NI\n498060\n6SE\n2NI/4SE\n498061\n6SE\nINI/5SE\n498062\n6SE\n4NI/2SE\n584100575\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned in bold?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "584100575", "role": "assistant" } ]
527
Cig. Code 498062 and B&W 6SE is mentioned in which RIP?
RIP-4
Page 3 RIP - 6 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 41/6 61/6 498058 61/6 51/6 498059 41/6 61/6 498060 51/6 51/6 498061 51/6 61/6 498062 61/6 61/6 RIP-4 Cig. Code B&W Ecusta 498057 11/5SE 31/INI/2SE 498058 11/SSE 11/INI/4SE 498059 6SE 6NI 498060 6SE 2NI/4SE 498061 6SE INI/5SE 498062 6SE 4NI/2SE 584100575 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 341, "image": "rncj0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
228
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nRIP - 6\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n41/6\n61/6\n498058\n61/6\n51/6\n498059\n41/6\n61/6\n498060\n51/6\n51/6\n498061\n51/6\n61/6\n498062\n61/6\n61/6\nRIP-4\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n11/5SE\n31/INI/2SE\n498058\n11/SSE\n11/INI/4SE\n498059\n6SE\n6NI\n498060\n6SE\n2NI/4SE\n498061\n6SE\nINI/5SE\n498062\n6SE\n4NI/2SE\n584100575\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: Cig. Code 498062 and B&W 6SE is mentioned in which RIP?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "RIP-4", "role": "assistant" } ]
528
What is the title of the document?
KOOL ULTRA KS / 100
Page 10 B&W KOOL ULTRA KS / 100 Objective . Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100 Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers Dupont Results . Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers . Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers 399000387 Status . KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results DMPS Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 328, "image": "hyhk0037_10.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "10" }
222
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the document?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "KOOL ULTRA KS / 100", "role": "assistant" } ]
529
Which is more superior out of Ultra KS Prototype or Salem Ultra 100 among rep mentol ultra smokers?
Ultra KS Prototype
Page 10 B&W KOOL ULTRA KS / 100 Objective . Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100 Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers Dupont Results . Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers . Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers 399000387 Status . KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results DMPS Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 328, "image": "hyhk0037_10.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "10" }
231
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: Which is more superior out of Ultra KS Prototype or Salem Ultra 100 among rep mentol ultra smokers?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Ultra KS Prototype", "role": "assistant" } ]
530
KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The?
The Kool LTS KS CPT results
Page 10 B&W KOOL ULTRA KS / 100 Objective . Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100 Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers Dupont Results . Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers . Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers 399000387 Status . KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results DMPS Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 328, "image": "hyhk0037_10.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "10" }
235
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The Kool LTS KS CPT results", "role": "assistant" } ]
531
What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?
399000387
Page 10 B&W KOOL ULTRA KS / 100 Objective . Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100 Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers Dupont Results . Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers . Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers 399000387 Status . KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results DMPS Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 328, "image": "hyhk0037_10.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "10" }
222
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "399000387", "role": "assistant" } ]
532
What is the first line of the address mentioned at the top?
Reynolds Building
Page 1 RJReynolds Reynolds Building 4th and Main Street Winston-Salem, NC 27102 FACT SHEET Camel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends May 4, 2000 Camel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along with a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos - an innovation that pioneered the first "truly American" cigarette and what is known today as the "American blend." Anything that deserves to be called "a classic" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car, or clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. "A classic" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also appeals to a modern sense of style and taste Camel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different decades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a timeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own. Camel has been a "Pleasure to Burn Since 1913." Camel's latest advertising campaign, "Pleasure to Burn," spans decades of the brand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of today's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also keeps up with the times. The ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of the old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a "retro" feel, but a second look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective wears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady reminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone. -more- 52522 2172 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
1
{ "doc_id": 329, "image": "tynx0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
436
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRJReynolds\nReynolds Building\n4th and Main Street\nWinston-Salem, NC 27102\nFACT SHEET\nCamel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends\nMay 4, 2000\nCamel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along\nwith a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos\n- an innovation that pioneered the first \"truly American\" cigarette and what is known\ntoday as the \"American blend.\"\nAnything that deserves to be called \"a classic\" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car,\nor clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. \"A\nclassic\" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also\nappeals to a modern sense of style and taste\nCamel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different\ndecades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a\ntimeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own.\nCamel has been a \"Pleasure to Burn Since 1913.\"\nCamel's latest advertising campaign, \"Pleasure to Burn,\" spans decades of the\nbrand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of\ntoday's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also\nkeeps up with the times.\nThe ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of\nthe old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a \"retro\" feel, but a\nsecond look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective\nwears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady\nreminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone.\n-more-\n52522 2172\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: What is the first line of the address mentioned at the top?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Reynolds Building", "role": "assistant" } ]
533
What is the date mentioned?
May 4, 2000
Page 1 RJReynolds Reynolds Building 4th and Main Street Winston-Salem, NC 27102 FACT SHEET Camel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends May 4, 2000 Camel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along with a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos - an innovation that pioneered the first "truly American" cigarette and what is known today as the "American blend." Anything that deserves to be called "a classic" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car, or clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. "A classic" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also appeals to a modern sense of style and taste Camel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different decades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a timeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own. Camel has been a "Pleasure to Burn Since 1913." Camel's latest advertising campaign, "Pleasure to Burn," spans decades of the brand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of today's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also keeps up with the times. The ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of the old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a "retro" feel, but a second look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective wears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady reminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone. -more- 52522 2172 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
1
{ "doc_id": 329, "image": "tynx0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
432
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRJReynolds\nReynolds Building\n4th and Main Street\nWinston-Salem, NC 27102\nFACT SHEET\nCamel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends\nMay 4, 2000\nCamel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along\nwith a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos\n- an innovation that pioneered the first \"truly American\" cigarette and what is known\ntoday as the \"American blend.\"\nAnything that deserves to be called \"a classic\" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car,\nor clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. \"A\nclassic\" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also\nappeals to a modern sense of style and taste\nCamel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different\ndecades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a\ntimeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own.\nCamel has been a \"Pleasure to Burn Since 1913.\"\nCamel's latest advertising campaign, \"Pleasure to Burn,\" spans decades of the\nbrand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of\ntoday's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also\nkeeps up with the times.\nThe ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of\nthe old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a \"retro\" feel, but a\nsecond look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective\nwears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady\nreminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone.\n-more-\n52522 2172\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "May 4, 2000", "role": "assistant" } ]
536
To whom is this letter addressed?
W.E.Claflin
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To: W. E. Claflin Date: June 19, 1990 From:: B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton C90-03342 Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications made to that instrument relative to the original design. Modifications to the Hood: A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and constructed in the R&DD Shop. 1. The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow. 2. The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables easier and more frequent window replacement. 3. The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning. 4.. The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders. 5. The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL) to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first: few runs after the machine has been idle for some time. Modifications in Flow Measurement: 1. A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves. 2022156305 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 331, "image": "sxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
463
none
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: To whom is this letter addressed?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "W.E.Claflin", "role": "assistant" } ]
537
What is the date mentioned?
June 19, 1990
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To: W. E. Claflin Date: June 19, 1990 From:: B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton C90-03342 Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications made to that instrument relative to the original design. Modifications to the Hood: A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and constructed in the R&DD Shop. 1. The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow. 2. The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables easier and more frequent window replacement. 3. The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning. 4.. The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders. 5. The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL) to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first: few runs after the machine has been idle for some time. Modifications in Flow Measurement: 1. A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves. 2022156305 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 331, "image": "sxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
463
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "June 19, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]
538
What is the subject of the document?
Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To: W. E. Claflin Date: June 19, 1990 From:: B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton C90-03342 Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications made to that instrument relative to the original design. Modifications to the Hood: A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and constructed in the R&DD Shop. 1. The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow. 2. The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables easier and more frequent window replacement. 3. The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning. 4.. The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders. 5. The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL) to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first: few runs after the machine has been idle for some time. Modifications in Flow Measurement: 1. A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves. 2022156305 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 331, "image": "sxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
468
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the document?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument", "role": "assistant" } ]
539
What is the date mentioned in the document ?
June 19, 1990
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A. INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia To: W. E. Claflin Date: June 19, 1990 From:: B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton C90-03342 Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications made to that instrument relative to the original design. Modifications to the Hood: A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and constructed in the R&DD Shop. 1. The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow. 2. The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables easier and more frequent window replacement. 3. The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning. 4.. The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders. 5. The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL) to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first: few runs after the machine has been idle for some time. Modifications in Flow Measurement: 1. A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves. 2022156305 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 331, "image": "sxxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
466
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the document ?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "June 19, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]
540
Heading of the document?
Kool Improvement
Page 3 B&W KOOL IMPROVEMENT Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating Various Technologies Project Basis Technologies . New Blend (XLF - 1088G) . Ammoniated Recon (EBR) . Increased Humectants . Increased Menthol Levels . New Cigarette Designs 399000380 KOOL "C" DMP Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 332, "image": "hyhk0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
112
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Kool Improvement", "role": "assistant" } ]
541
How many samples were produced?
Over 300
Page 3 B&W KOOL IMPROVEMENT Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating Various Technologies Project Basis Technologies . New Blend (XLF - 1088G) . Ammoniated Recon (EBR) . Increased Humectants . Increased Menthol Levels . New Cigarette Designs 399000380 KOOL "C" DMP Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 332, "image": "hyhk0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
113
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: How many samples were produced?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Over 300", "role": "assistant" } ]
542
What is the third point mentioned in Project Basis Technologies?
Increased Humectants
Page 3 B&W KOOL IMPROVEMENT Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating Various Technologies Project Basis Technologies . New Blend (XLF - 1088G) . Ammoniated Recon (EBR) . Increased Humectants . Increased Menthol Levels . New Cigarette Designs 399000380 KOOL "C" DMP Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 332, "image": "hyhk0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
119
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the third point mentioned in Project Basis Technologies?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Increased Humectants", "role": "assistant" } ]
543
What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left border at the bottom?
399000380
Page 3 B&W KOOL IMPROVEMENT Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating Various Technologies Project Basis Technologies . New Blend (XLF - 1088G) . Ammoniated Recon (EBR) . Increased Humectants . Increased Menthol Levels . New Cigarette Designs 399000380 KOOL "C" DMP Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 332, "image": "hyhk0037_3.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "3" }
123
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left border at the bottom?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "399000380", "role": "assistant" } ]
544
What is the Objective of the document?
Develop a Kool KS Product that is superior to Newport among Kool KS Smokers
Page 4 B&W KOOL KS Objective . Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport Among KOOL KS Smokers CPT Results . KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers . KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable, More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better. Menthol Taste Than Newport 399000381 KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented In 1993 DMP4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 333, "image": "hyhk0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
181
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Objective of the document?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Develop a Kool KS Product that is superior to Newport among Kool KS Smokers", "role": "assistant" } ]
545
When was the KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Implemented?
1993
Page 4 B&W KOOL KS Objective . Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport Among KOOL KS Smokers CPT Results . KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers . KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable, More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better. Menthol Taste Than Newport 399000381 KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented In 1993 DMP4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 333, "image": "hyhk0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
176
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: When was the KOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Implemented?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1993", "role": "assistant" } ]
546
Heading of the document?
Kool KS
Page 4 B&W KOOL KS Objective . Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport Among KOOL KS Smokers CPT Results . KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers . KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable, More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better. Menthol Taste Than Newport 399000381 KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented In 1993 DMP4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 333, "image": "hyhk0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
164
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Kool KS", "role": "assistant" } ]
547
What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?
399000381
Page 4 B&W KOOL KS Objective . Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport Among KOOL KS Smokers CPT Results . KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers . KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable, More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better. Menthol Taste Than Newport 399000381 KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented In 1993 DMP4 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
1
{ "doc_id": 333, "image": "hyhk0037_4.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "4" }
172
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "399000381", "role": "assistant" } ]
548
What is the STRAIN TA100,REV/CIG of G7-25 with 1.0% turkish extract?
12621
Page 2 RESULTS STRAIN TABB STRAIN TA100 REV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR Control: G7-25 1173 13841 1051 12402 G7-25 with 0.5% 1124 13713 994 12127 turkish extract G7-25 with 0.75% 1235 13709 942 10456 turkish extract G7-25 with 1.0% 1238 14361 1088 12621 turkish extract Control: Low extract 1226 13731 918 10282 G7 shee Low extract G7 with 1482 17191 1094 12690 0.5% turkish extract Low extract G7 with 1206 14231 932 10998 0.75% turkish extract Low extract G7 with 1430 17017 946 11257 1.0% turkish extract Sample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis. There were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and, there were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the turkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory. Cindy Cindy Fulp XC: Dr. C.K. Lee Dr. D.J. Doolittle Dr. D.C. Rees: 51003 0968 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 335, "image": "hgbl0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
387
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nRESULTS\nSTRAIN TABB\nSTRAIN TA100\nREV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR\nControl: G7-25\n1173\n13841\n1051\n12402\nG7-25 with 0.5%\n1124\n13713\n994\n12127\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 0.75%\n1235\n13709\n942\n10456\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 1.0%\n1238\n14361\n1088\n12621\nturkish extract\nControl: Low extract\n1226\n13731\n918\n10282\nG7 shee\nLow extract G7 with\n1482\n17191\n1094\n12690\n0.5% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1206\n14231\n932\n10998\n0.75% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1430\n17017\n946\n11257\n1.0% turkish extract\nSample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis.\nThere were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and,\nthere were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the\nturkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory.\nCindy\nCindy Fulp\nXC:\nDr. C.K. Lee\nDr. D.J. Doolittle\nDr. D.C. Rees:\n51003 0968\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the STRAIN TA100,REV/CIG of G7-25 with 1.0% turkish extract?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "12621", "role": "assistant" } ]
549
What is the sample of the STRAIN TA100, REV/MG TAR 1094?
Low extract G7 with 0.5% turkish extract
Page 2 RESULTS STRAIN TABB STRAIN TA100 REV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR Control: G7-25 1173 13841 1051 12402 G7-25 with 0.5% 1124 13713 994 12127 turkish extract G7-25 with 0.75% 1235 13709 942 10456 turkish extract G7-25 with 1.0% 1238 14361 1088 12621 turkish extract Control: Low extract 1226 13731 918 10282 G7 shee Low extract G7 with 1482 17191 1094 12690 0.5% turkish extract Low extract G7 with 1206 14231 932 10998 0.75% turkish extract Low extract G7 with 1430 17017 946 11257 1.0% turkish extract Sample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis. There were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and, there were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the turkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory. Cindy Cindy Fulp XC: Dr. C.K. Lee Dr. D.J. Doolittle Dr. D.C. Rees: 51003 0968 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
1
{ "doc_id": 335, "image": "hgbl0037_2.png", "ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "2" }
391
fuzzy
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 2\nRESULTS\nSTRAIN TABB\nSTRAIN TA100\nREV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR\nControl: G7-25\n1173\n13841\n1051\n12402\nG7-25 with 0.5%\n1124\n13713\n994\n12127\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 0.75%\n1235\n13709\n942\n10456\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 1.0%\n1238\n14361\n1088\n12621\nturkish extract\nControl: Low extract\n1226\n13731\n918\n10282\nG7 shee\nLow extract G7 with\n1482\n17191\n1094\n12690\n0.5% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1206\n14231\n932\n10998\n0.75% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1430\n17017\n946\n11257\n1.0% turkish extract\nSample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis.\nThere were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and,\nthere were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the\nturkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory.\nCindy\nCindy Fulp\nXC:\nDr. C.K. Lee\nDr. D.J. Doolittle\nDr. D.C. Rees:\n51003 0968\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the sample of the STRAIN TA100, REV/MG TAR 1094?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Low extract G7 with 0.5% turkish extract", "role": "assistant" } ]
551
What is the date mentioned?
May 29, 1990
Page 1 PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A. INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Richmond, Virginia 6502 C90-03100 To: R. Ferguson Date: May 29, 1990 From: F. HSU 1 - Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990 During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air & Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary of presentations grouped by specific subjects. SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE) As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off- line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke analysis system is potentially possible. Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer (Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles, pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids 2022155944 Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
1
{ "doc_id": 336, "image": "qhxj0037_1.png", "ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037", "ucsf_document_page_no": "1" }
657
exact
[ { "content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\n6502\nC90-03100\nTo:\nR. Ferguson\nDate: May 29, 1990\nFrom:\nF. HSU 1 -\nSubject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990\nDuring May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic\nand Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &\nWaste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were\ndivided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four\nconcurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held\ninvolving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling\nequipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap\nprevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary\nof presentations grouped by specific subjects.\nSUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)\nAs in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample\npreparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical\ntechniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used\nsupercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex\nCorp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent\nremoval and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction\ntime resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of\nSFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic\nmodifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from\ndifferent matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of\nmatrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-\nline operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar\nmodifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application\nparticularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A\nthreshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be\ndefined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke\nanalysis system is potentially possible.\nSome sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer\n(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,\npesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very\neffective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids\n2022155944\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?", "role": "user" }, { "content": "May 29, 1990", "role": "assistant" } ]