question_id
int64 337
65.5k
| question
stringlengths 11
209
| answer
stringlengths 1
145
| document_text
stringlengths 30
7.9k
| page
int64 1
1
| other_metadata
dict | num_tokens
int64 26
1.76k
| match_type
stringclasses 3
values | messages
listlengths 2
2
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
337
|
what is the date mentioned in this letter?
|
1/8/93
|
Page 1
Confidential
.. ..
RJRT PR APPROVAL
DATE :
1/8/13
Ru alAs
PROPOSED RELEASE DATE:
for response
FOR RELEASE TO:
CONTACT:
P. CARTER
ROUTE TO
Initials
pate
Peggy Carter
Ac
Maura Payne
David Fishel
Tom GRISCom
Diane Barrows
Ed Blackmer
Tow Rucker
TR
Return to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building
51142 3977
. .
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 279,
"image": "xnbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xnbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 148
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConfidential\n.. ..\nRJRT PR APPROVAL\nDATE :\n1/8/13\nRu alAs\nPROPOSED RELEASE DATE:\nfor response\nFOR RELEASE TO:\nCONTACT:\nP. CARTER\nROUTE TO\nInitials\npate\nPeggy Carter\nAc\nMaura Payne\nDavid Fishel\nTom GRISCom\nDiane Barrows\nEd Blackmer\nTow Rucker\nTR\nReturn to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building\n51142 3977\n. .\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037\n\nQuestion: what is the date mentioned in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1/8/93",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
338
|
what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?
|
P. Carter
|
Page 1
Confidential
.. ..
RJRT PR APPROVAL
DATE :
1/8/13
Ru alAs
PROPOSED RELEASE DATE:
for response
FOR RELEASE TO:
CONTACT:
P. CARTER
ROUTE TO
Initials
pate
Peggy Carter
Ac
Maura Payne
David Fishel
Tom GRISCom
Diane Barrows
Ed Blackmer
Tow Rucker
TR
Return to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building
51142 3977
. .
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 279,
"image": "xnbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xnbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 147
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nConfidential\n.. ..\nRJRT PR APPROVAL\nDATE :\n1/8/13\nRu alAs\nPROPOSED RELEASE DATE:\nfor response\nFOR RELEASE TO:\nCONTACT:\nP. CARTER\nROUTE TO\nInitials\npate\nPeggy Carter\nAc\nMaura Payne\nDavid Fishel\nTom GRISCom\nDiane Barrows\nEd Blackmer\nTow Rucker\nTR\nReturn to Peggy Carter, PR, 16 Reynolds Building\n51142 3977\n. .\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xnb10037\n\nQuestion: what is the contact person name mentioned in letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "P. Carter",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
339
|
Which corporation's letterhead is this?
|
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 496
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: Which corporation's letterhead is this?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
340
|
Who is in cc in this letter?
|
T.F. Riehl
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 498
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: Who is in cc in this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "T.F. Riehl",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
341
|
what is the subject of this letter?
|
Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 501
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the subject of this letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Review of existing Brainstorming Ideas/483",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
343
|
What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?
|
499150498
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
. . . .
INTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
R. H. Honeycutt
CC:
T.F. Riehl
FROM:
C. J. Cook
DATE:
May 8. 1995
SUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483
The major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products
that would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different
from anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different
introduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may
ncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique
taste or look.
The first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of
existing brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled
appearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ
from a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other
categories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.
Appearance
This category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with
minimal changes in smoke chemistry
Two cigarettes in one
.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.
.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.
future smoking.
Cigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for
.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.
. Extremely fast buming cigarette.
-. ..". " .
. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while
maintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.
. . .
. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.
. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch
. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for
Easter or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)
and all white cigarettes.
499150498
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 280,
"image": "mxcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 500
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\n. . . .\nINTERNAL CORRESPONDENCE\nTO:\nR. H. Honeycutt\nCC:\nT.F. Riehl\nFROM:\nC. J. Cook\nDATE:\nMay 8. 1995\nSUBJECT: Review of Existing Brainstorming Ideas/483\nThe major function of the Product Innovation Group is to develop marketable novel products\nthat would be profitable to manufacture and sell. Novel is defined as: of a new kind, or different\nfrom anything seen or known before. Innovation is defined as: something new or different\nintroduced; act of innovating; introduction of new things or methods. The products may\nncorporate the latest technologies, materials and know-how available to give then a unique\ntaste or look.\nThe first task of the Product Innovation Group was to assemble, review and categorize a list of\nexisting brainstorming ideas. Ideas were grouped into two major categories labeled\nappearance and taste/aroma. These categories are used for novel products that may differ\nfrom a visual and/or taste/aroma point of view compared to conventional cigarettes. Other\ncategories include a combination of the above, filters, packaging and brand extensions.\nAppearance\nThis category is used for novel cigarette constructions that yield visually different products with\nminimal changes in smoke chemistry\nTwo cigarettes in one\n.Multi-plug to build your own cigarette.\n.Switchable menthol or non menthol cigarette.\nfuture smoking.\nCigarettes with interspaced perforations to enable smoker to separate unburned section for\n.Short cigarette, tobacco section 30 mm.\n. Extremely fast buming cigarette.\n-. ..\". \" .\n. Novel cigarette constructions that permit a significant reduction in tobacco weight while\nmaintaining smoking mechanics and visual characteristics.\n. . .\n. Higher basis weight paper; potential reduction in tobacco weight.\n. More rigid tobacco column; stiffing agent for tobacco; e.g. starch\n. Colored tow and cigarette papers; seasonal promotions, e.g. pastel colored cigarettes for\nEaster or in an Ebony and Ivory brand containing a mixture of all black (black paper and tow)\nand all white cigarettes.\n499150498\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the number at the bottom of the page, in bold?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "499150498",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
388
|
How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation
|
5.
|
Page 2
2.
The rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SILPM mass flow
meter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original
design, flow is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4" needle
valve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke
measurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter
is bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4" needle valve
(Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2" piping. The latter
valve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a 0-25 cm
H, O Dwyer Magnehelico gauge) to that of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining
the flow when the meter is removed from the circuit.
Modifications to Readout Instrumentation:
The single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier
was replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the
zero attenuateon level.
2:
To reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output
voltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the
instrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data
system and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced
3.
Signal leads were re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF
pickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated.
4.
A running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual
aid to the operator.
5.
Changes to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate
minor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any
reported parameters.
CC:
P: N. Gauvin
B. L. Goodman
A. C. Lilly
D. D. McRae
E. B. Sanders
J. E. Wickham
Central Files
-2-
2022156306
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 297,
"image": "sxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 488
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\n2.\nThe rotometer in the original design was replaced by a 0-100 SILPM mass flow\nmeter (Hastings #200B) to provide more precise flow settings. As in the original\ndesign, flow is set before each smoke run by manual adjustment of a 3/4\" needle\nvalve (Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and the flowmeter is bypassed during smoke\nmeasurements to minimize contamination. In the new design the mass flowmeter\nis bypassed during smoke runs by the parallel combination of a 3/4\" needle valve\n(Whitey SS65XTF12-F16) and a length of unrestricted 1/2\" piping. The latter\nvalve is adjusted to give an identical pressure drop (as indicated by a 0-25 cm\nH, O Dwyer Magnehelico gauge) to that of the mass flowmeter, thus maintaining\nthe flow when the meter is removed from the circuit.\nModifications to Readout Instrumentation:\nThe single turn sensitivity potentiometer supplied on the Oriel #7072 amplifier\nwas replaced with a ten turn potentiometer to allow more precise settings of the\nzero attenuateon level.\n2:\nTo reduce noise and drift in the computer data acquisition system, the output\nvoltage divider internal to the Oriel amplifier was altered to increase the\ninstrument's output by a factor of 100. The sensitivities of the computer data\nsystem and the parallel strip chart recorder were correspondingly reduced\n3.\nSignal leads were re-dressed and shielded to minimize ground loops and RF\npickup. The exposed terminal board was eliminated.\n4.\nA running display of output voltage was added to the computer screen as a visual\naid to the operator.\n5.\nChanges to the computer program were made by Randy Greene to eliminate\nminor operational problems. The changes did not affect the calculation of any\nreported parameters.\nCC:\nP: N. Gauvin\nB. L. Goodman\nA. C. Lilly\nD. D. McRae\nE. B. Sanders\nJ. E. Wickham\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022156306\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many points are there in modifications to readout instrumentation",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "5.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
399
|
what is the date in the letter
|
June 11, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 564
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the date in the letter",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "June 11, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
400
|
To whom this is addressed
|
Dr.K.S.Houghton
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 561
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: To whom this is addressed",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Dr.K.S.Houghton",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
401
|
Who sent the letter?
|
Ted Sanders
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 557
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Who sent the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Ted Sanders",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
402
|
Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from
|
Richmond
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To
Dr. K. S. Houghton
Date: June 11, 1990
From:
Ted Sanders
Subject:
Paper Technology Update for the Week of June 4
Reduced Sidestream
Trim
Short-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding
Virginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,
use of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids
(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal
filters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and
increased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the
schedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is
to design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity
higher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated
that the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate
system compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow
outer wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%
sidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.
A Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the
outer wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences
were seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of
the 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they
were both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be
remade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.
Lotus
The low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims
double wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other
model had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model
was judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the
models.
2022155886
C90-03066
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 314,
"image": "nhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 561
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo\nDr. K. S. Houghton\nDate: June 11, 1990\nFrom:\nTed Sanders\nSubject:\nPaper Technology Update for the Week of June 4\nReduced Sidestream\nTrim\nShort-term plans have been formulated to address customer complaints regarding\nVirginia Slims Superslims. Models will be made which will evaluate lower tobacco density,\nuse of outer wraps coated with potassium phosphate and/or short chain dicarboxylic acids\n(malonic and succinic), outer wraps containing mixed chalk (Albacar and Multifex), charcoal\nfilters, increased chalk content in the inner wrap, increased basis weight for the inner wrap, and\nincreased tar delivery (9 mg). A memo has been issued by Jeanette Hickle outlining the\nschedule for making these models. A longer term approach directed at improving subjectives is\nto design an outer wrap using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent but at a porosity\nhigher than has been investigated for full circumference cigarettes. Calculations have indicated\nthat the greater effectiveness of the Multifex calcium carbonate/mono potassium phosphate\nsystem compared to the Multifex calcium carbonate/potassium succinate system can allow\nouter wraps to be designed with Coresta porosities of up to 12 and still obtain greater than 70%\nsidestream reduction for a 17 mm circumference cigarette.\nA Superslims model with 50% of the Multifex chalk replaced by Albacar chalk in the\nouter wrap was tested on the MC Panel versus a control Superslims. No significant differences\nwere seen in any of the attributes. The only analytical difference was the slower burn rate of\nthe 50:50 model. Although both of these models were essentially similar in every respect, they\nwere both out of spec with regard to delivery (7 mg tar). Consequently, these models will be\nremade in Louisville to the correct tar delivery.\nLotus\nThe low sidestream panel evaluated full circumference cigarettes with the Superslims\ndouble wrap system on Marlboro blend. One model used 100% Multifex chalk, while the other\nmodel had a 50:50 Multifex/Albacar mixture as the inorganic filler. Although neither model\nwas judged to be subjectively acceptable, the panel could detect no differences between the\nmodels.\n2022155886\nC90-03066\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which part of Virginia is this letter sent from",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Richmond",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
411
|
What sort of communication/letter is this ?
|
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 593
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What sort of communication/letter is this ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
412
|
What is the date mentioned in the letter?
|
April 27, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 592
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "April 27, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
413
|
Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?
|
A second Danchi Test
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 597
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which test is used to evaluate ART menthol levels that has been shipped?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "A second Danchi Test",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
414
|
What is the subject of the document/letter?
|
Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE
CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To :
Mr. James L. Myracle
Date: April 27, 1990
From :
H. L. Spielberg
Subject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990
C90-03267
PROJECT ART :
Samples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to
ARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in
solution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the
target level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted
for analyses.
These included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level
and 208 increased level of GMC on filler.
The lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-
menthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,
13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a
control product at 13.08 OV.
Production of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market
began C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and
non-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.
Evaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched
trials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After
the Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-
batched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the
control and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.
Similar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are
in progress .
Combinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine
utilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific
levels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at
Bermuda Hundred
Nippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color
variations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol
levels has been shipped.
Small-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super
Lights and "Castor" type flavors.
TAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :
Subjective Studies :
A Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15
mg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.
2022156205
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 352,
"image": "mxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 597
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS. U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE\nCORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo :\nMr. James L. Myracle\nDate: April 27, 1990\nFrom :\nH. L. Spielberg\nSubject: Flavor. Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990\nC90-03267\nPROJECT ART :\nSamples of the GMC, 8842-5 aftercut and POL 0704 models were sent to\nARD for method development and quantification of GMC on filler and in\nsolution. Preliminary analytical data indicate approximately 75% of the\ntarget level of GMC is on the filler. Additional models were also submitted\nfor analyses.\nThese included the 208 and 408 reduced level, control level\nand 208 increased level of GMC on filler.\nThe lowest acceptable OV study has been initiated on the 9 mg non-\nmenthol salesman samples. Models are complete at 10.8, 11.3, 11.9, 12.7,\n13.0 and 13.68 OV. These models will be subjectively evaluated against a\ncontrol product at 13.08 OV.\nProduction of Next KS and 100's for the Tampa, Florida test market\nbegan C Shift April 23, 1990 at the MC. Menthol production is complete and\nnon-menthol production will be complete by the end of the week.\nEvaluations of citric acid stems from single versus double-batched\ntrials have shown promise at the 28 substitution level in Pilot RL. After\nthe Flavor Development panel showed the single to be comparable to double-\nbatched stems, results of the MC panel showed no differences between the\ncontrol and double-batched test RL in Marlboro.\nSimilar comparisons at the 58 substitution level in production RCB are\nin progress .\nCombinations of test RL and RCB will be selected to determine\nutilization levels. Qualification of double-batched stems at specific\nlevels should allow usage of single or half-batched stems being tested at\nBermuda Hundred\nNippon ART concept Danchi test to evaluate tar and tipping color\nvariations has been shipped. A second Danchi test to evaluate ART menthol\nlevels has been shipped.\nSmall-scale samples were made to evaluate PM Super\nLights and \"Castor\" type flavors.\nTAR/NICOTINE INTERACTION :\nSubjective Studies :\nA Tar/Nicotine interaction study to assess 1010 mm models from 3 to 15\nmg tar and from 0.3 to 1.58 filler nicotine is in progress.\n2022156205\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the document/letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Flavor Development Monthly Summary for April, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
416
|
what is the index for Retention of Franchise
|
100
|
Page 9
Consumer Dynamics
CARLTON
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.3%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
9.3%
( 88)
Rate of Quitting Losses
9.4%
(113)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
81.9%
(116)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(100)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.1%
( 6)
. ... .
314002838
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 355,
"image": "rzbj0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 164
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: what is the index for Retention of Franchise",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "100",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
417
|
What is the source
|
USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
|
Page 9
Consumer Dynamics
CARLTON
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.3%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
9.3%
( 88)
Rate of Quitting Losses
9.4%
(113)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
81.9%
(116)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(100)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.1%
( 6)
. ... .
314002838
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 355,
"image": "rzbj0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 173
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the source",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
418
|
The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?
|
314002838
|
Page 9
Consumer Dynamics
CARLTON
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.3%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
9.3%
( 88)
Rate of Quitting Losses
9.4%
(113)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
81.9%
(116)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
1.7%
(100)
Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0.1%
( 6)
. ... .
314002838
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 355,
"image": "rzbj0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 168
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nConsumer Dynamics\nCARLTON\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.3%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n9.3%\n( 88)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n9.4%\n(113)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n81.9%\n(116)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n1.7%\n(100)\nShare of the 21-25 Segment:\n0.1%\n( 6)\n. ... .\n314002838\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: The number mentioned on the right of the leftside margin?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "314002838",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
419
|
Heading of the document
|
Domestic Product Development (cont'd.)
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 445
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Domestic Product Development (cont'd.)",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
420
|
what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel
|
80mm and 83mm
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 453
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: what mm Marlboro Menthol were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "80mm and 83mm",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
421
|
Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?
|
evaluation of lip release
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 453
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for what purpose?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "evaluation of lip release",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
422
|
Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks
|
next 2-3 weeks
|
Page 3
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Project Marlboro
- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.
- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.
- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for
analytical testing.
- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.
Fabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.
Marlboro Menthol
Marlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.
After further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero
ventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.
Bucks
Bucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the
Richmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done
on these prototypes.
Miscellaneous
Additional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being
analyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for
evaluation of lip release.
Competitive Testing
HTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.
POL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production
sample has been submitted for analytical testing.
POL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically
and subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.
3
2022155853
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 298,
"image": "khxj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 459
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nProject Marlboro\n- POL 0330 - 1.6 tar/puff - 80mm has been produced and currently is in C.I. for analytical.\n- POL 0331 - 1.6 tar/puff - 84mm was produced 6/1/90. Samples have been submitted to C.I.\n- Marlboro Double Batch - RL & RCB was produced 6/4/90. Samples have been submitted for\nanalytical testing.\n- POL 3634 - RL Evaporator Upgrade - Scheduling for primary at the M/C has been completed.\nFabrication is scheduled for the week of 6/18/90 in Semiworks.\nMarlboro Menthol\nMarlboro Menthol 80mm and 83mm were subjectively smoked by the Richmond Panel.\nAfter further review of the data and specifications, another model of the 83mm with zero\nventilation will be made at Semiworks within the next 2-3 weeks.\nBucks\nBucks K.S. Lights and Full Flavor with various aftercut modifications were smoked by the\nRichmond Panel. Particular models were selected from the group and POL testing will be done\non these prototypes.\nMiscellaneous\nAdditional tipping papers of Marlboro Lights have been received and currently are being\nanalyzed for lip release coatings. Cigarettes will be produced and submitted to O/C Panel for\nevaluation of lip release.\nCompetitive Testing\nHTI 4845, Cambridge 85's versus Doral 85's - These samples were shipped on 6/4/90.\nPOL 0912, Virginia Slims Lights Menthol versus Salem Slims Lights - A new production\nsample has been submitted for analytical testing.\nPOL 0917, Marlboro 80 versus Camel 80 - These samples were approved both analytically\nand subjectively and are in open/overtip/repack status.\n3\n2022155853\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Another model of the 83mm with zero ventilation will be made at Semiworks within how many weeks",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "next 2-3 weeks",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
424
|
Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date
|
6/7/90
|
Page 2
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Menthol
POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL
0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg
tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)
close out on June 7, 1990.
Best of the Lowest
BOLD
Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing
with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The
test is scheduled in make/pack next week
Ambrosia I
POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned
for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.
Ambrosia II
The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have
been completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270
have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm
menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.
Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs
during the week of June 11.
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed
to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by
buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and
prevent this occurrence.
2
2022155852
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 299,
"image": "khxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 507
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nMenthol\nPOL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL\n0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg\ntar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)\nclose out on June 7, 1990.\nBest of the Lowest\nBOLD\nPrimary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing\nwith a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The\ntest is scheduled in make/pack next week\nAmbrosia I\nPOL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned\nfor around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.\nAmbrosia II\nThe 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have\nbeen completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270\nhave also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm\nmenthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.\nCigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs\nduring the week of June 11.\nDuring the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed\nto have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by\nbuildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and\nprevent this occurrence.\n2\n2022155852\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: Under BOLD, primary production of Blend #24- will be completed by which date",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6/7/90",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
426
|
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper
|
Cigarette paper
|
Page 2
DOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)
Menthol
POL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL
0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg
tar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)
close out on June 7, 1990.
Best of the Lowest
BOLD
Primary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing
with a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The
test is scheduled in make/pack next week
Ambrosia I
POL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned
for around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.
Ambrosia II
The 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have
been completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270
have also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm
menthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.
Cigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs
during the week of June 11.
During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed
to have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by
buildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and
prevent this occurrence.
2
2022155852
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 299,
"image": "khxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "khxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 512
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nDOMESTIC PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT (cont'd.)\nMenthol\nPOL 0618 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff was shipped on June 1, 1990. POL\n0414 (1.4mg tar/puff and 0.02mg menthol/puff) closes out on June 6, 1990; POL 0422 (1.8mg\ntar/puff and 0.09mg menthol/puff) and POL 0417 (0.3mg tar/puff and 0.05mg menthol/puff)\nclose out on June 7, 1990.\nBest of the Lowest\nBOLD\nPrimary production of Blend #240 will be completed 6/7/90. A light Total Blend Casing\nwith a sweet-type aftercut (8951-10) will be the flavor system used for POL 0268. The\ntest is scheduled in make/pack next week\nAmbrosia I\nPOL 7191 (9mg versus 11mg) is being made. A factory trial is tentatively being planned\nfor around 6/18/90. Development continues on flow controllers from R&D and Engineering.\nAmbrosia II\nThe 100mm POLs #0535 (LSS), #0536 (LSS/Low Odor) and #0537 (Low Odor) have\nbeen completed and will be shipped this week. Three 85mm POLs, #0266, #0267, and #0270\nhave also been made and are scheduled to be shipped the week of June 11. Five 85mm\nmenthol models have been produced and have been submitted for analytical evaluation.\nCigarette paper is expected to arrive on June 8 for production of three 85mm menthol POLs\nduring the week of June 11.\nDuring the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed\nto have burn holes in the cigarette paper. These holes are believed to have been caused by\nbuildup on the electrodes of the perforator. Steps are being taken to further investigate and\nprevent this occurrence.\n2\n2022155852\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/khxj0037\n\nQuestion: During the process of prototype production and ringtipping, some cigarettes were observed to have burn holed in which paper",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Cigarette paper",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
434
|
Heading of the document?
|
Memorandum
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 593
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Memorandum",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
435
|
Where was the conference held?
|
B&W headquarters
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 594
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: Where was the conference held?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B&W headquarters",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
437
|
How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?
|
At least two
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 611
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: How many distinct mechanisms appear to play a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional flowfield?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "At least two",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
438
|
One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?
|
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.
|
Page 1
. ' . . -7
In 22. BY
* se , up
MEMORANDUM
TO :
From :
Mr. R. Rugh Honeycutt
Subject:
A. J. Baker
The Aerodynamics of Swirl
Date:
October 1, 1984
SUMMARY
The conference on "smoke swirl," held at BAW Headquarters,
brought together various elements of the BAT organization with the
goal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on
directed velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report
documents impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.
DISCUSSION
1.
The results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups
on directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position
the interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the
oral cavity.
The data on the desirability of one specific
configuration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.
Clearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will
be required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.
2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct
these tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct
definitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics
analyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter
design. Specifically, the use of the word "swirl" to characterize
all flows that are not unidirectional,
oversimplification.
is probably an
At least two distinct mechanisms appear to play
a role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional
flowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type
design appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow
manner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a
function of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),
the data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke
(Southampton )
for a single column system, seemed to confirm existence
of a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results
in breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.
distinctly different from the
This mechanism appears
"Actron" flowfield, although both
indeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.
3.
I would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the
associated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating
data. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the
influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible
that acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert
comCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494
501102013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 303,
"image": "nmcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nmcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 606
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n. ' . . -7\nIn 22. BY\n* se , up\nMEMORANDUM\nTO :\nFrom :\nMr. R. Rugh Honeycutt\nSubject:\nA. J. Baker\nThe Aerodynamics of Swirl\nDate:\nOctober 1, 1984\nSUMMARY\nThe conference on \"smoke swirl,\" held at BAW Headquarters,\nbrought together various elements of the BAT organization with the\ngoal of cummunication of results associated with experimentation on\ndirected velocity systems with filter designs. This brief report\ndocuments impressions gained by the writer on the broad issue.\nDISCUSSION\n1.\nThe results presented by the Southhampton and Hamburg groups\non directed smoke jets verify the ability of filter design to position\nthe interaction of smoke jet columns at various locations within the\noral cavity.\nThe data on the desirability of one specific\nconfiguration in comparison to alternatives was less conclusive.\nClearly, rather comprehensive testing matrices with smoker panels will\nbe required to determine the relative efficiency of specific designs.\n2. Prior to commission of the financial resources to conduct\nthese tests and correlate the data, it appears desirable to conduct\ndefinitive laboratory tests (and perhaps, theoretical fluid dynamics\nanalyses) to isolate exact cause and effect relations of filter\ndesign. Specifically, the use of the word \"swirl\" to characterize\nall flows that are not unidirectional,\noversimplification.\nis probably an\nAt least two distinct mechanisms appear to play\na role in the breakup of a smoke column into a multi-dimensional\nflowfield. Specifically, the multiple jet geometry of an Actron-type\ndesign appears to generate a vortex flowfield that in a steady-flow\nmanner can rapidly disperse the smoke column. Alternatively, as a\nfunction of smoke column preconditioning by a filter (or tobacco rod),\nthe data presented by kelly St. Charles (BW) and Martin Duke\n(Southampton )\nfor a single column system, seemed to confirm existence\nof a time-varying unsteadiness in smake column stability which results\nin breakup and multi-dimensional dispersion.\ndistinctly different from the\nThis mechanism appears\n\"Actron\" flowfield, although both\nindeed result in enhanced dispersion characteristics.\n3.\nI would suggest that BEW consider a refinement of the\nassociated laboratory experiment designs to generate discriminating\ndata. One variable that has implicitly not been controlled is the\ninfluence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry. It is possible\nthat acoustic pressure reflections off the chamber walls might exert\ncomCO . 3601A Chapman Highway . Isnoxville, TN 37920 . Phone: (615) 577-5494\n501102013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nmcj0037\n\nQuestion: One variable that has implicitly not been controlled?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "influence of the test chamber (glass mouth) geometry.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
442
|
What is the full form of PUF?
|
POLYURETHANE FOAM
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 807
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of PUF?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "POLYURETHANE FOAM",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
443
|
Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?
|
nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 809
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which hetero-atoms does polar compounds contain?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "nitrogen, sulfur and oxygen.",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
446
|
What is the full form of POVC?
|
POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 808
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the full form of POVC?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
447
|
Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?
|
D. J. EATOUGH
|
Page 2
with modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular
forces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)
experimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide
varieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and
PAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)
showed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also
demonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.
Foreman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover
pesticides in high yield.
DETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR
The polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and
oxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar
compounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke
components shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic
trap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the
mass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.
The present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.
Unfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls
and alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,
e.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.
J. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in
PVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which
replaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using
a standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,
methyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -
70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual
activity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem
is to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass
spectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.
Atmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by
EPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe
fitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems
showed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms
capability for identification of unknown.
NICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE
D. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality
study in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective
in January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following
objectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors
-2-
2022155945
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 312,
"image": "qhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 811
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nwith modifier was necessary for the polyimide sorbents due to the stronger intermolecular\nforces. M. Krieger (Indiana University) and S. Hawthorne (University of N. Dakota)\nexperimented with polyurethane foam (PUF) with SFE in quantitatively recovering wide\nvarieties of organic compounds. These included semi-volatiles, phenols, aromatics, and\nPAH's. A PUF sampling of air in a smoker's office and followed by SFE-GC (S. Hawthorne)\nshowed the presence of phenols, nicotine and fatty acids. PUF and SFE-GC were also\ndemonstrated in quantitative measurements of phenolics in woodsmoke analysis. W. T.\nForeman (U.S. Geological Survey, CO) extracted the C, , cartridge with SFE to recover\npesticides in high yield.\nDETERMINATION OF POLAR VOLATILE ORGANICS (PVOC) IN AMBIENT AIR\nThe polar compounds are those containing hetero-atoms such as nitrogen, sulfur and\noxygen. The single most difficult problem in developing protocols for analyzing polar\ncompounds at trace level in air is probably moisture. Sampling of sidestream smoke\ncomponents shared similar difficulty. The moisture in the ambient air clogged up the cryogenic\ntrap and prevented sample enrichment. The evaporation of water vapor in the source of the\nmass spectrometer interfered with the high vacuum and the detection of co-eluting compounds.\nThe present EPA TO-14 method requires the use of Naphion dryer to eliminate water.\nUnfortunately, the Naphion tube is also permeable to many polar compounds such carbonyls\nand alcohols. Method TO-14 with canister sampling is only for nonpolar organic compounds,\ne.g. aromatics and hydrocarbons.\nJ. Pleil (U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC) summarized the research activity in\nPVOC. Two developments are worth mentioning here. A SUMMA passivated canister, which\nreplaced sampling bags in air sampling, was evaluated for its stability towards PVOC by using\na standard mixture consisting acetonitrile, methanol, acetone, acrylnitrile, butanal, isopropanol,\nmethyl ethyl ketone, ethyl acrylate and methyl methacrylate. Wide variation of the data (2 -\n70% RSD) in the subsequent analysis over several weeks indicated the presence of residual\nactivity from the canister's metal surface. Another approach to overcome the moisture problem\nis to eliminate the sampling step altogether by using real-time detection. Ion trap mass\nspectrometer (ITMS) is being evaluated as a dynamic detection and identification system.\nAtmospheric pressure inlet and glow discharge ionization (API/GD) is being investigated by\nEPA for air sample introduction into ITMS. Another inlet system using a direct sniffer probe\nfitted with a needle valve was reported by D. Berberich (Monsanto Company). Both systems\nshowed low ppb sensitivity (1 - 60 ppb) and the ITMS provided mass scanning and ms/ms\ncapability for identification of unknown.\nNICOTINE. IN ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE\nD. J. Eatough (Brigham Young University) presented the results on cabin air quality\nstudy in commercial aircraft. Future study was halted when the smoking ban became effective\nin January of this year. This study was conducted in a DC-10 aircraft with the following\nobjectives (1) to quantify concentrations of ETS species; (2) to identify the factors\n-2-\n2022155945\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Who presented the results on cabin air quality study in commercial aircraft?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "D. J. EATOUGH",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
453
|
What is the slope mentioned in the first table?
|
0.1088102E+01
|
Page 9
WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 14 ;259-279
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0 . 0000
150. 164. 174.
162.7
12. 1
25 .0000
157. 181. 186.
174.7
15.5
50 . 0000
181. 191. 191.
187.7
5 .8
75.0000
224. 224. 244.
230.7
11.5
100 . 0000
256. 261. 252.
256.3
4.5
125.0000
297. 316. 299.
304.0 10.4
250.0000
382. 359 . 388.
376.3 15.3
SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01
1088 Rusing the
6 disse
CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 15 ;280-300
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0.0000
145. 152. 149.
148.7
3.5
25.0000
174. 154. 160
162.7
10.3
50.000
187. 196. 202.
195.0
7 .5
75 . 0000
202. 219. 215.
212.0
8.9
100 . 0000
205. 218. 241.
221.3
18.2
125 . 0000
267. 275. 276.
272.7
4.9
250 . 0000
306. 274. 312.
297.3 20.4
SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00
918 Reims for
ledoges
WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 1 ; 301-321
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S.D.
0. 0000
135. 127. 148.
136.7
10. 6
25.0000
155. 155. 170.
160.0
8 . 7
50. 0000
190. 190. 164.
181.3 15.0
75 . 0000
183. 202. 193
192.7
9.5
100 .0000
226. 263. 250.
246.3
18.8
125 .0000
293. 276. 271.
280.0
11.5
250 . 0000
337. 399. 380.
372.0
31.8
SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01
10 94 Revimp for
51003 0975
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 313,
"image": "hgbl0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 741
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the slope mentioned in the first table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0.1088102E+01",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
455
|
What is the date mentioned in the second table?
|
05-12-92
|
Page 9
WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 14 ;259-279
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0 . 0000
150. 164. 174.
162.7
12. 1
25 .0000
157. 181. 186.
174.7
15.5
50 . 0000
181. 191. 191.
187.7
5 .8
75.0000
224. 224. 244.
230.7
11.5
100 . 0000
256. 261. 252.
256.3
4.5
125.0000
297. 316. 299.
304.0 10.4
250.0000
382. 359 . 388.
376.3 15.3
SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01
1088 Rusing the
6 disse
CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 15 ;280-300
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0.0000
145. 152. 149.
148.7
3.5
25.0000
174. 154. 160
162.7
10.3
50.000
187. 196. 202.
195.0
7 .5
75 . 0000
202. 219. 215.
212.0
8.9
100 . 0000
205. 218. 241.
221.3
18.2
125 . 0000
267. 275. 276.
272.7
4.9
250 . 0000
306. 274. 312.
297.3 20.4
SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00
918 Reims for
ledoges
WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 1 ; 301-321
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S.D.
0. 0000
135. 127. 148.
136.7
10. 6
25.0000
155. 155. 170.
160.0
8 . 7
50. 0000
190. 190. 164.
181.3 15.0
75 . 0000
183. 202. 193
192.7
9.5
100 .0000
226. 263. 250.
246.3
18.8
125 .0000
293. 276. 271.
280.0
11.5
250 . 0000
337. 399. 380.
372.0
31.8
SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01
10 94 Revimp for
51003 0975
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 313,
"image": "hgbl0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 738
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the second table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "05-12-92",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
456
|
What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?
|
10.6
|
Page 9
WINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 14 ;259-279
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0 . 0000
150. 164. 174.
162.7
12. 1
25 .0000
157. 181. 186.
174.7
15.5
50 . 0000
181. 191. 191.
187.7
5 .8
75.0000
224. 224. 244.
230.7
11.5
100 . 0000
256. 261. 252.
256.3
4.5
125.0000
297. 316. 299.
304.0 10.4
250.0000
382. 359 . 388.
376.3 15.3
SLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01
1088 Rusing the
6 disse
CONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 15 ;280-300
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S. D.
0.0000
145. 152. 149.
148.7
3.5
25.0000
174. 154. 160
162.7
10.3
50.000
187. 196. 202.
195.0
7 .5
75 . 0000
202. 219. 215.
212.0
8.9
100 . 0000
205. 218. 241.
221.3
18.2
125 . 0000
267. 275. 276.
272.7
4.9
250 . 0000
306. 274. 312.
297.3 20.4
SLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00
918 Reims for
ledoges
WINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92
SET # 1 ; 301-321
DOSE-ug
PLATE COUNTS
MEAN S.D.
0. 0000
135. 127. 148.
136.7
10. 6
25.0000
155. 155. 170.
160.0
8 . 7
50. 0000
190. 190. 164.
181.3 15.0
75 . 0000
183. 202. 193
192.7
9.5
100 .0000
226. 263. 250.
246.3
18.8
125 .0000
293. 276. 271.
280.0
11.5
250 . 0000
337. 399. 380.
372.0
31.8
SLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01
10 94 Revimp for
51003 0975
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 313,
"image": "hgbl0037_9.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "9"
}
| 749
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 9\nWINSTON LT, G725 WITH 18 TURKISH EXTRACT/5$8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 14 ;259-279\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0 . 0000\n150. 164. 174.\n162.7\n12. 1\n25 .0000\n157. 181. 186.\n174.7\n15.5\n50 . 0000\n181. 191. 191.\n187.7\n5 .8\n75.0000\n224. 224. 244.\n230.7\n11.5\n100 . 0000\n256. 261. 252.\n256.3\n4.5\n125.0000\n297. 316. 299.\n304.0 10.4\n250.0000\n382. 359 . 388.\n376.3 15.3\nSLOPE= 0. 1088102E+01\n1088 Rusing the\n6 disse\nCONTROL WINSTON LT, LOW EXI G7 SHEET/5:$-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 15 ;280-300\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S. D.\n0.0000\n145. 152. 149.\n148.7\n3.5\n25.0000\n174. 154. 160\n162.7\n10.3\n50.000\n187. 196. 202.\n195.0\n7 .5\n75 . 0000\n202. 219. 215.\n212.0\n8.9\n100 . 0000\n205. 218. 241.\n221.3\n18.2\n125 . 0000\n267. 275. 276.\n272.7\n4.9\n250 . 0000\n306. 274. 312.\n297.3 20.4\nSLOPE= 0. 9183201E+00\n918 Reims for\nledoges\nWINSTON LT, LOW EXT G7 WITH 0.5% TURKISH EXT/5 8-9/100/05-12-92\nSET # 1 ; 301-321\nDOSE-ug\nPLATE COUNTS\nMEAN S.D.\n0. 0000\n135. 127. 148.\n136.7\n10. 6\n25.0000\n155. 155. 170.\n160.0\n8 . 7\n50. 0000\n190. 190. 164.\n181.3 15.0\n75 . 0000\n183. 202. 193\n192.7\n9.5\n100 .0000\n226. 263. 250.\n246.3\n18.8\n125 .0000\n293. 276. 271.\n280.0\n11.5\n250 . 0000\n337. 399. 380.\n372.0\n31.8\nSLOPE= 0. 1094010E+01\n10 94 Revimp for\n51003 0975\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the S.D. mentioned in the DOSE-ug 0.0000 in the third table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10.6",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
460
|
Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?
|
University of Maine
|
Page 2
The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the
University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical
Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler.
The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'
paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will
mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight
papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on
these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase
sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper
will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in
order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek
245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized
for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors
will also be carried out.
A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of
30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic
filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing
titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with
calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to
the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of
titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the
observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium
carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes
made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant
sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.
A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian
magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of
the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in
filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the
sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.
Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.
In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a
study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream
visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a
- 2 -
2022155887
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 315,
"image": "nhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 711
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Where were the two magnesium containing papers made at?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "University of Maine",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
465
|
Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?
|
091
|
Page 2
The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the
University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical
Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler.
The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'
paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will
mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight
papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on
these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase
sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper
will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in
order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek
245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized
for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors
will also be carried out.
A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of
30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic
filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing
titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with
calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to
the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of
titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the
observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium
carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes
made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant
sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.
A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian
magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of
the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in
filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the
sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.
Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.
In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a
study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream
visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a
- 2 -
2022155887
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 315,
"image": "nhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 724
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which base paper will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in order to optimize the system?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "091",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
466
|
which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette
|
low smoke cigarette
|
Page 5
unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made
about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in
less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but
probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to
be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full
circumference cigarette--a product of the future.
When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less
smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed
disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides
sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in
terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference
cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.
VSSS Circumference
These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker
cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,
novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be
appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something
hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing
VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they
would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that
would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.
Smoke Odor
The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the
smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The
number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate
with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an
annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,
forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full
circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception
because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not
noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.
2022156005
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 354,
"image": "fxxj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 561
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: which cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker cigarette",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "low smoke cigarette",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
467
|
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?
|
high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate
|
Page 2
The low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the
University of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical
Research Division personnel with lower levels of filler.
The decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'
paper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will
mean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight
papers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on
these papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase
sidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper
will be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in
order to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek
245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized
for sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors
will also be carried out.
A series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of
30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic
filler, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing
titanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with
calcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to
the standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of
titanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the
observed lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.
Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium
carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes
made from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant
sidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.
A set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian
magnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of
the matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in
filer level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the
sidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.
Sidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.
In order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a
study was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream
visibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a
- 2 -
2022155887
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 315,
"image": "nhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "nhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 733
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nThe low sidestream panel smoked two magnesium containing papers made at the\nUniversity of Maine and found them to very dry. Additional papers will be made by Chemical\nResearch Division personnel with lower levels of filler.\nThe decision to utilize full circumference cigarettes with a single wrap of 45 g/m'\npaper using mono potassium phosphate as the fluxing agent for the Ambrosia II POL's will\nmean that additional paper development work will be required for these lower basis weight\npapers. The study with the highest priority will be to investigate the effect of malonic acid on\nthese papers. Results with 63g/m' papers suggest that it should be possible to increase\nsidestream reduction from the current 55-60% range to the 65-70% range. The 091 base paper\nwill be coated in-house with various levels of mono potassium phosphate and malonic acid in\norder to optimize the system. Also, it will be necessary to investigate the stability of Aromatek\n245 on papers containing malonic acid. Work to improve the subjectives of models optimized\nfor sidestream reduction through the use of charcoal filters and the design of aftercut flavors\nwill also be carried out.\nA series of hand-made cigarettes has been made from hand sheets with a basis weight of\n30 g/m' , various ratios of Albacar calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide as the inorganic\nfiller, and sodium fumarate (0.8% to 1.5%) as the fluxing agent. All models containing\ntitanium dioxide gave increased sidestream visibility as compared to either a model with\ncalcium carbonate as the sole inorganic filler with sodium fumarate as the fluxing agent or to\nthe standard control cigarette (AFK). This experiment clearly indicates that neither the use of\ntitanium dioxide or sodium fumarate in Japanese cigarette wrappers plays any role in the\nobserved lower sidestream visibility for these cigarettes.\nHand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of a high surface area magnesium\ncarbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate. Cigarettes\nmade from these hand sheets using potassium succinate as the fluxing agent gave significant\nsidestream reduction as well as an acceptable ash. More work will be done with this system.\nA set of six hand sheets obtained from Ecusta containing Baymag A (Canadian\nmagnesite) as the inorganic filler was used for hand-made models. These sheets were part of\nthe matrix study. The sheets were made to two basis weights, 55 and 65 g/m' , and varied in\nfiler level (25-35%) and porosity (4.7 to 10.7 Coresta). Based upon inspection of the\nsidestream reductions obtained, it would appear that porosity is the controlling variable.\nSidestream reductions varied inversely with porosity irrespective of the other two variables.\nIn order for us to make valid comparisons of our data with data obtained at Ecusta, a\nstudy was completed wherein a series of five cigarettes which varied significantly in sidestream\nvisibility was evaluated in-house using the eight-port visibility instrument and at Ecusta using a\n- 2 -\n2022155887\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/nhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Hand sheets were made utilizing a 30% level of which component?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "high surface area magnesium carbonate semihydrate made by the pyrolysis of magnesium ammonium carbonate",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
468
|
How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS
|
Over Fifty percent
|
Page 5
unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made
about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in
less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but
probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to
be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full
circumference cigarette--a product of the future.
When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less
smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed
disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides
sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in
terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference
cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.
VSSS Circumference
These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker
cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,
novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be
appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something
hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing
VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they
would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that
would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.
Smoke Odor
The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the
smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The
number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate
with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an
annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,
forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full
circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception
because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not
noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.
2022156005
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 354,
"image": "fxxj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 565
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How much percent had not noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Over Fifty percent",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
469
|
who were bothered by cigarette odors
|
Nonsmokers
|
Page 5
unprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made
about the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in
less criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but
probably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to
be relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full
circumference cigarette--a product of the future.
When asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less
smoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed
disbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides
sounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in
terms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference
cigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.
VSSS Circumference
These smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker
cigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,
novel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be
appealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something
hey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing
VSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they
would be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that
would mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.
Smoke Odor
The majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the
smoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The
number one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate
with cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an
annoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,
forty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full
circumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception
because of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not
noticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.
2022156005
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 354,
"image": "fxxj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 558
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nunprompted comments concerning low smoke. Unprompted comments were made\nabout the circumference. These smokers said a low smoke product might result in\nless criticism of smoking-if the nonsmoker was not a fanatic against smoking--but\nprobably would not result in compliments. Many of these smokers did not seem to\nbe relating low smoke to VSSS but were thinking of a hypothetically full\ncircumference cigarette--a product of the future.\nWhen asked if VSSS lived up to the advertising claim that they give off 70% less\nsmoke than a leading 100's cigarette, only approximately ten percent expressed\ndisbelief. However, a percent reduction (e.g. 70%) really meant little (besides\nsounding impressive) because these smokers had not thought of visible smoke in\nterms of percents nor had they compared VSSS smoke to a regular circumference\ncigarette. They had no reason to doubt what the ad claimed.\nVSSS Circumference\nThese smokers said that a low smoke cigarette would be better if offered on a thicker\ncigarette (e.g., 25mm or 23mm). They said the thinness of VSSS was cute, unique,\nnovel, very feminine but were not sure how long this uniqueness would be\nappealing. Some said the thinness brought attention to their smoking--something\nhey were not interested in doing. These smokers feared dropping or misplacing\nVSSS. They attributed the low smoke to the thinness of VSSS. When asked if they\nwould be more interested in a reduction in smoke of 85% they said no because that\nwould mean that the cigarette would be even thinner.\nSmoke Odor\nThe majority said that smoke odor--specifically lingering-was annoying to the\nsmoker. They also agreed that nonsmokers were bothered by cigarette odors. The\nnumber one annoyance was lingering odors; however, many said all odors associate\nwith cigarettes annoyed nonsmokers. Cigarette odors were viewed as more of an\nannoyance to nonsmokers than visible smoke. When asked about the odor of VSSS,\nforty percent said VSSS had a lighter, better odor (fresh and lingering) than a full\ncircumference 100's. However, they said that this may have just been a perception\nbecause of the thinness and reduction in visible smoke. Over fifty percent had not\nnoticed any difference in the odor of VSSS.\n2022156005\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: who were bothered by cigarette odors",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Nonsmokers",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
478
|
What is the heading of first table?
|
Slim Cigarettes
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 279
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of first table?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Slim Cigarettes",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
479
|
What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?
|
6I/6
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 282
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is RIP-6 value for KOOL KS?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6I/6",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
480
|
What is the heading of second table
|
K. C. Cigarettes
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 281
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the heading of second table",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "K. C. Cigarettes",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
481
|
What is the cigarette code of RIP-6(W/O Filter) 21/4SE
|
P4049-99(5C)
|
Page 4
SLIM CIGARETTES
Cigarette Name
RIP-6
RIP-4
More White Lts 120
61/6
6SE/6
SAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown
61/6
3NI/3SE
Stixs
61/6
21/3NI/1SE
CAPRI
51/3NI
2NI/4SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Box
61/6
INI/5SE
Virginia Slim SS 100 Men Box
51/1SE
6SE/6
GPC
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
KOOL KS
61/6
41/1NI/1SE
K. C. CIGARETTES
Cigarette Code
RIP-6(W/0 Filter)
RIP-6(W/Filter)
P4049 -99 (5C)
21/4SE
6SE
P4049-99A (7C)
11/5SE
6SE
2. 5% AlC13 on GPC
31/3SE
584100576
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 317,
"image": "rncj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 294
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nSLIM CIGARETTES\nCigarette Name\nRIP-6\nRIP-4\nMore White Lts 120\n61/6\n6SE/6\nSAVANNAH Lt 100 Brown\n61/6\n3NI/3SE\nStixs\n61/6\n21/3NI/1SE\nCAPRI\n51/3NI\n2NI/4SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Box\n61/6\nINI/5SE\nVirginia Slim SS 100 Men Box\n51/1SE\n6SE/6\nGPC\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nKOOL KS\n61/6\n41/1NI/1SE\nK. C. CIGARETTES\nCigarette Code\nRIP-6(W/0 Filter)\nRIP-6(W/Filter)\nP4049 -99 (5C)\n21/4SE\n6SE\nP4049-99A (7C)\n11/5SE\n6SE\n2. 5% AlC13 on GPC\n31/3SE\n584100576\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the cigarette code of RIP-6(W/O Filter) 21/4SE",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "P4049-99(5C)",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
482
|
What is the name of the corporation?
|
brown & Williamson tobacco corporation
|
Page 1
2 why today
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
MEETING REPORT
SUBJECT :
Reduced Ignition Propensity/498
PRESENT :
A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles
L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994
ISSUE DATE:
January 25, 1994
CC:
Attendees, T. F. Riehl
The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items
from the January 10th meeting.
. Lee Chao
1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In
progress
2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.
3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6
testing - Done (see attached results).
4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial
results attached) .
5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.
6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.
7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress
(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~
approval needed) .
. Kelley St. Charles
1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta
getting data ready to be sent.
584100570
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 318,
"image": "qncj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 396
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n2 why today\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\nMEETING REPORT\nSUBJECT :\nReduced Ignition Propensity/498\nPRESENT :\nA. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles\nL. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman\nMEETING DATE: January 24, 1994\nISSUE DATE:\nJanuary 25, 1994\nCC:\nAttendees, T. F. Riehl\nThe purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items\nfrom the January 10th meeting.\n. Lee Chao\n1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In\nprogress\n2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.\n3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6\ntesting - Done (see attached results).\n4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial\nresults attached) .\n5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.\n6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.\n7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress\n(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~\napproval needed) .\n. Kelley St. Charles\n1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta\ngetting data ready to be sent.\n584100570\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the corporation?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "brown & Williamson tobacco corporation",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
483
|
What is the subject?
|
reduced ignition propensity/498
|
Page 1
2 why today
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
MEETING REPORT
SUBJECT :
Reduced Ignition Propensity/498
PRESENT :
A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles
L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994
ISSUE DATE:
January 25, 1994
CC:
Attendees, T. F. Riehl
The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items
from the January 10th meeting.
. Lee Chao
1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In
progress
2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.
3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6
testing - Done (see attached results).
4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial
results attached) .
5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.
6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.
7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress
(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~
approval needed) .
. Kelley St. Charles
1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta
getting data ready to be sent.
584100570
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 318,
"image": "qncj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 394
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n2 why today\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\nMEETING REPORT\nSUBJECT :\nReduced Ignition Propensity/498\nPRESENT :\nA. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles\nL. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman\nMEETING DATE: January 24, 1994\nISSUE DATE:\nJanuary 25, 1994\nCC:\nAttendees, T. F. Riehl\nThe purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items\nfrom the January 10th meeting.\n. Lee Chao\n1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In\nprogress\n2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.\n3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6\ntesting - Done (see attached results).\n4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial\nresults attached) .\n5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.\n6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.\n7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress\n(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~\napproval needed) .\n. Kelley St. Charles\n1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta\ngetting data ready to be sent.\n584100570\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "reduced ignition propensity/498",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
484
|
What is the meeting date?
|
January 24, 1994
|
Page 1
2 why today
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION
RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
MEETING REPORT
SUBJECT :
Reduced Ignition Propensity/498
PRESENT :
A. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles
L. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman
MEETING DATE: January 24, 1994
ISSUE DATE:
January 25, 1994
CC:
Attendees, T. F. Riehl
The purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items
from the January 10th meeting.
. Lee Chao
1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In
progress
2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.
3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6
testing - Done (see attached results).
4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial
results attached) .
5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.
6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.
7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress
(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~
approval needed) .
. Kelley St. Charles
1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta
getting data ready to be sent.
584100570
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 318,
"image": "qncj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 396
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\n2 why today\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO CORPORATION\nRESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT\nMEETING REPORT\nSUBJECT :\nReduced Ignition Propensity/498\nPRESENT :\nA. McMurtrie, R. H. Honeycutt, J. Wu, F. K. St. Charles\nL. C. Chao, S. W. Brooks, R. A. Gonterman\nMEETING DATE: January 24, 1994\nISSUE DATE:\nJanuary 25, 1994\nCC:\nAttendees, T. F. Riehl\nThe purpose of this meeting was to review the specific follow-up items\nfrom the January 10th meeting.\n. Lee Chao\n1. Run 17-21mm products and SAVANNAH Browns on RIP-4 - In\nprogress\n2. Send Ecusta cotton duck #4 fabric - Done.\n3. Send 498057-062 cigarettes to Ecusta for RIP-4 and RIP-6\ntesting - Done (see attached results).\n4. Run 498057-062 cigarettes on RIP-4 - In progress (partial\nresults attached) .\n5. Run P4049-99, 99A, 99B, and 100 on RIP-4 - In progress.\n6. Request Art Diesing approval of banded papers - In progress.\n7. Evaluate aluminum chloride as a burn retardant - In progress\n(preliminary results show 2.5% to look promising. Art Diesing ~\napproval needed) .\n. Kelley St. Charles\n1. Check with Ecusta on status of IR camera studies - Ecusta\ngetting data ready to be sent.\n584100570\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the meeting date?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "January 24, 1994",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
486
|
How many one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th?
|
forty
|
Page 2
METHOD
Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,
Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during
April 10th through the April 12th
The participants were screened for the following requirements:
Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55
Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra
low delivery cigarettes
Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack
Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS
PROCEDURE
Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given
any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to
elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except
packaging, that were discussed in the groups.
The major topics covered included:
Initial introduction
Recall of advertising
Continuing to smoke VSSS
Purpose of product
Likes/dislikes
Suggestions for improvement
Low visible smoke
VSSS circumference
Smoke odor
Packaging
2022156002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 319,
"image": "fxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 301
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many one-on-one interviews were completed during April 10th through the April 12th?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "forty",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
487
|
According to the listed requirements , what must be the age group of female smokers?
|
between the ages of 18 and 55
|
Page 2
METHOD
Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,
Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during
April 10th through the April 12th
The participants were screened for the following requirements:
Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55
Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra
low delivery cigarettes
Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack
Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS
PROCEDURE
Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given
any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to
elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except
packaging, that were discussed in the groups.
The major topics covered included:
Initial introduction
Recall of advertising
Continuing to smoke VSSS
Purpose of product
Likes/dislikes
Suggestions for improvement
Low visible smoke
VSSS circumference
Smoke odor
Packaging
2022156002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 319,
"image": "fxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 303
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: According to the listed requirements , what must be the age group of female smokers?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "between the ages of 18 and 55",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
488
|
According to the requirements what is the minimum required consumption of a regular brand?
|
1/2 pack
|
Page 2
METHOD
Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,
Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during
April 10th through the April 12th
The participants were screened for the following requirements:
Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55
Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra
low delivery cigarettes
Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack
Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS
PROCEDURE
Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given
any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to
elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except
packaging, that were discussed in the groups.
The major topics covered included:
Initial introduction
Recall of advertising
Continuing to smoke VSSS
Purpose of product
Likes/dislikes
Suggestions for improvement
Low visible smoke
VSSS circumference
Smoke odor
Packaging
2022156002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 319,
"image": "fxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 297
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: According to the requirements what is the minimum required consumption of a regular brand?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1/2 pack",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
489
|
How many focus groups were held?
|
Two
|
Page 2
METHOD
Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,
Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during
April 10th through the April 12th
The participants were screened for the following requirements:
Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55
Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra
low delivery cigarettes
Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack
Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS
PROCEDURE
Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given
any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to
elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except
packaging, that were discussed in the groups.
The major topics covered included:
Initial introduction
Recall of advertising
Continuing to smoke VSSS
Purpose of product
Likes/dislikes
Suggestions for improvement
Low visible smoke
VSSS circumference
Smoke odor
Packaging
2022156002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 319,
"image": "fxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 286
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: How many focus groups were held?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Two",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
490
|
Which interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in groups?
|
The one-on-one
|
Page 2
METHOD
Two focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,
Massachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during
April 10th through the April 12th
The participants were screened for the following requirements:
Females smokers between the ages of 18 and 55
Current brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra
low delivery cigarettes
Daily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack
Smoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS
PROCEDURE
Two focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given
any product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to
elicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except
packaging, that were discussed in the groups.
The major topics covered included:
Initial introduction
Recall of advertising
Continuing to smoke VSSS
Purpose of product
Likes/dislikes
Suggestions for improvement
Low visible smoke
VSSS circumference
Smoke odor
Packaging
2022156002
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 319,
"image": "fxxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "fxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 298
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nMETHOD\nTwo focus groups were conducted on April 9th at First Market Research in Boston,\nMassachusetts. In addition, approximately forty one-on-one interviews were completed during\nApril 10th through the April 12th\nThe participants were screened for the following requirements:\nFemales smokers between the ages of 18 and 55\nCurrent brand 85mm, 100mm, or 120mm nonmenthol full flavor, low delivery, and ultra\nlow delivery cigarettes\nDaily consumption of regular brand at least 1/2 pack\nSmoked at least 1/2 pack of nonmenthol VSSS\nPROCEDURE\nTwo focus groups were held with ten female smokers per group. The smokers were not given\nany product to smoke but in the groups they were shown the carton and package in order to\nelicit comments on the packaging. The one-on-one interviews covered the same topics, except\npackaging, that were discussed in the groups.\nThe major topics covered included:\nInitial introduction\nRecall of advertising\nContinuing to smoke VSSS\nPurpose of product\nLikes/dislikes\nSuggestions for improvement\nLow visible smoke\nVSSS circumference\nSmoke odor\nPackaging\n2022156002\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/fxxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which interviews covered the same topics, except packaging, that were discussed in groups?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The one-on-one",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
491
|
What is the Best Prototype mentioned?
|
327391
|
Page 5
CUT TOBACCO:
MT -768 D
BST391
BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391
BLEND :
BW-6071
LBS AT 12.5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
STRIPS :
FLUE CURED . . . .
3. 681. 7
3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %
BURLEY .
1 , 996.3
3 , 221.5
( 1, 746.8 )
+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .
2, 159.0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
ORIENTAL . . . . .
1 , 243 . 4
1, 088.0
1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %
RECONSTITUTED . .
2, 321.7
2, 031 .5
2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
TOTAL STRIPS.
9 , 243 . 1
8, 500.0
10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %
GRADE BIN
GRADE
LBS AT 12. 5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
1 C2F
C2F . . .
. . .
913. 1
799.0
940.0 @ 15.0 %
3 L2F
L2F . . . . . .
1, 311. 4
1 , 147.5
1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %
5 .T2F
T2F . . .
. . . .
582.9
510.0
600.0 @ 15.0 %
7 L2FR
L2FR . . .
583.2
510.3
600.3 @ 15.0 %
T2FR . . . .
291. 1
254. 7
299.7
874. 3
765.0
900. 0
65 EBRC
EBR . . . . . . . . . . .
1 , 350.3
1, 181.5
1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
70 CPCLF
CPCL . . .
971 . 4
850. 0
1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %
73 AOB3
CAB . . .
207 .6
181.7
213.8 @ 15.0 %
TAB . . .
414. 1
426 .2
UAB .
207 .6
362.3
181.7
213.8
YAB . .
414.1
362.3
426 . 2
1 , 243 . 4
1 , 088. 0
1 , 280.0
977 BEST
MT-778 . . . . ;
+ CASING (S ) . . . . .
1 , 996 . 4
( 1, 746.8 )
2, 159. 0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
583232685
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 321,
"image": "lycj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 703
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Best Prototype mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "327391",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
492
|
What is the BLEND mentioned?
|
bw-6071
|
Page 5
CUT TOBACCO:
MT -768 D
BST391
BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391
BLEND :
BW-6071
LBS AT 12.5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
STRIPS :
FLUE CURED . . . .
3. 681. 7
3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %
BURLEY .
1 , 996.3
3 , 221.5
( 1, 746.8 )
+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .
2, 159.0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
ORIENTAL . . . . .
1 , 243 . 4
1, 088.0
1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %
RECONSTITUTED . .
2, 321.7
2, 031 .5
2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
TOTAL STRIPS.
9 , 243 . 1
8, 500.0
10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %
GRADE BIN
GRADE
LBS AT 12. 5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
1 C2F
C2F . . .
. . .
913. 1
799.0
940.0 @ 15.0 %
3 L2F
L2F . . . . . .
1, 311. 4
1 , 147.5
1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %
5 .T2F
T2F . . .
. . . .
582.9
510.0
600.0 @ 15.0 %
7 L2FR
L2FR . . .
583.2
510.3
600.3 @ 15.0 %
T2FR . . . .
291. 1
254. 7
299.7
874. 3
765.0
900. 0
65 EBRC
EBR . . . . . . . . . . .
1 , 350.3
1, 181.5
1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
70 CPCLF
CPCL . . .
971 . 4
850. 0
1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %
73 AOB3
CAB . . .
207 .6
181.7
213.8 @ 15.0 %
TAB . . .
414. 1
426 .2
UAB .
207 .6
362.3
181.7
213.8
YAB . .
414.1
362.3
426 . 2
1 , 243 . 4
1 , 088. 0
1 , 280.0
977 BEST
MT-778 . . . . ;
+ CASING (S ) . . . . .
1 , 996 . 4
( 1, 746.8 )
2, 159. 0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
583232685
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 321,
"image": "lycj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 705
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the BLEND mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "bw-6071",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
493
|
What is the LBS AT TARGET of TOTAL STRIPS?
|
10,000.0 @ 15.0 %
|
Page 5
CUT TOBACCO:
MT -768 D
BST391
BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391
BLEND :
BW-6071
LBS AT 12.5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
STRIPS :
FLUE CURED . . . .
3. 681. 7
3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %
BURLEY .
1 , 996.3
3 , 221.5
( 1, 746.8 )
+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .
2, 159.0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
ORIENTAL . . . . .
1 , 243 . 4
1, 088.0
1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %
RECONSTITUTED . .
2, 321.7
2, 031 .5
2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
TOTAL STRIPS.
9 , 243 . 1
8, 500.0
10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %
GRADE BIN
GRADE
LBS AT 12. 5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
1 C2F
C2F . . .
. . .
913. 1
799.0
940.0 @ 15.0 %
3 L2F
L2F . . . . . .
1, 311. 4
1 , 147.5
1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %
5 .T2F
T2F . . .
. . . .
582.9
510.0
600.0 @ 15.0 %
7 L2FR
L2FR . . .
583.2
510.3
600.3 @ 15.0 %
T2FR . . . .
291. 1
254. 7
299.7
874. 3
765.0
900. 0
65 EBRC
EBR . . . . . . . . . . .
1 , 350.3
1, 181.5
1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
70 CPCLF
CPCL . . .
971 . 4
850. 0
1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %
73 AOB3
CAB . . .
207 .6
181.7
213.8 @ 15.0 %
TAB . . .
414. 1
426 .2
UAB .
207 .6
362.3
181.7
213.8
YAB . .
414.1
362.3
426 . 2
1 , 243 . 4
1 , 088. 0
1 , 280.0
977 BEST
MT-778 . . . . ;
+ CASING (S ) . . . . .
1 , 996 . 4
( 1, 746.8 )
2, 159. 0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
583232685
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 321,
"image": "lycj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 717
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the LBS AT TARGET of TOTAL STRIPS?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "10,000.0 @ 15.0 %",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
494
|
What is the SOLID LBS of T2F GRADE?
|
510.0
|
Page 5
CUT TOBACCO:
MT -768 D
BST391
BEST PROTOTYPE. 327391
BLEND :
BW-6071
LBS AT 12.5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
STRIPS :
FLUE CURED . . . .
3. 681. 7
3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %
BURLEY .
1 , 996.3
3 , 221.5
( 1, 746.8 )
+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .
2, 159.0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
ORIENTAL . . . . .
1 , 243 . 4
1, 088.0
1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %
RECONSTITUTED . .
2, 321.7
2, 031 .5
2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
TOTAL STRIPS.
9 , 243 . 1
8, 500.0
10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %
GRADE BIN
GRADE
LBS AT 12. 5 %
SOLID LBS
LBS AT TARGET
1 C2F
C2F . . .
. . .
913. 1
799.0
940.0 @ 15.0 %
3 L2F
L2F . . . . . .
1, 311. 4
1 , 147.5
1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %
5 .T2F
T2F . . .
. . . .
582.9
510.0
600.0 @ 15.0 %
7 L2FR
L2FR . . .
583.2
510.3
600.3 @ 15.0 %
T2FR . . . .
291. 1
254. 7
299.7
874. 3
765.0
900. 0
65 EBRC
EBR . . . . . . . . . . .
1 , 350.3
1, 181.5
1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %
70 CPCLF
CPCL . . .
971 . 4
850. 0
1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %
73 AOB3
CAB . . .
207 .6
181.7
213.8 @ 15.0 %
TAB . . .
414. 1
426 .2
UAB .
207 .6
362.3
181.7
213.8
YAB . .
414.1
362.3
426 . 2
1 , 243 . 4
1 , 088. 0
1 , 280.0
977 BEST
MT-778 . . . . ;
+ CASING (S ) . . . . .
1 , 996 . 4
( 1, 746.8 )
2, 159. 0
2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %
583232685
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 321,
"image": "lycj0037_5.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "lycj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "5"
}
| 711
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 5\nCUT TOBACCO:\nMT -768 D\nBST391\nBEST PROTOTYPE. 327391\nBLEND :\nBW-6071\nLBS AT 12.5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\nSTRIPS :\nFLUE CURED . . . .\n3. 681. 7\n3, 790. 0 @ 15.0 %\nBURLEY .\n1 , 996.3\n3 , 221.5\n( 1, 746.8 )\n+ CASING ( S ) . . . . .\n2, 159.0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\nORIENTAL . . . . .\n1 , 243 . 4\n1, 088.0\n1, 280.0 @ 15.0 %\nRECONSTITUTED . .\n2, 321.7\n2, 031 .5\n2, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\nTOTAL STRIPS.\n9 , 243 . 1\n8, 500.0\n10 , 000. 0 @ 15.0 %\nGRADE BIN\nGRADE\nLBS AT 12. 5 %\nSOLID LBS\nLBS AT TARGET\n1 C2F\nC2F . . .\n. . .\n913. 1\n799.0\n940.0 @ 15.0 %\n3 L2F\nL2F . . . . . .\n1, 311. 4\n1 , 147.5\n1, 350.0 @ 15.0 %\n5 .T2F\nT2F . . .\n. . . .\n582.9\n510.0\n600.0 @ 15.0 %\n7 L2FR\nL2FR . . .\n583.2\n510.3\n600.3 @ 15.0 %\nT2FR . . . .\n291. 1\n254. 7\n299.7\n874. 3\n765.0\n900. 0\n65 EBRC\nEBR . . . . . . . . . . .\n1 , 350.3\n1, 181.5\n1, 390.0 @ 15.0 %\n70 CPCLF\nCPCL . . .\n971 . 4\n850. 0\n1, 000.0 @ 15.0 %\n73 AOB3\nCAB . . .\n207 .6\n181.7\n213.8 @ 15.0 %\nTAB . . .\n414. 1\n426 .2\nUAB .\n207 .6\n362.3\n181.7\n213.8\nYAB . .\n414.1\n362.3\n426 . 2\n1 , 243 . 4\n1 , 088. 0\n1 , 280.0\n977 BEST\nMT-778 . . . . ;\n+ CASING (S ) . . . . .\n1 , 996 . 4\n( 1, 746.8 )\n2, 159. 0\n2, 540.0 @ 15.0 %\n583232685\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/lycj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the SOLID LBS of T2F GRADE?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "510.0",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
496
|
What is the title of the letter?
|
interoffice memorandum
|
Page 1
R9044.90W
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: <Date>
TO: Mr. Roger Jennings
FROM: J. H. Reynolds
SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw
PROPOSAL NO.
R9044
The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider
your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is
approved, subject to the following modifications:
The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the
reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should
not always be at the left and right of the subjects.
In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those
who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should
be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list"
approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she
takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been
diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.
In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.
Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and
informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.
If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number
above in communications regarding this proposal.
John H. Reynolds,
Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC
51545 1013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 322,
"image": "mpcl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 352
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "interoffice memorandum",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
498
|
To whom is this letter addressed?
|
mr. roger jennings
|
Page 1
R9044.90W
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: <Date>
TO: Mr. Roger Jennings
FROM: J. H. Reynolds
SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw
PROPOSAL NO.
R9044
The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider
your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is
approved, subject to the following modifications:
The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the
reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should
not always be at the left and right of the subjects.
In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those
who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should
be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list"
approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she
takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been
diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.
In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.
Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and
informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.
If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number
above in communications regarding this proposal.
John H. Reynolds,
Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC
51545 1013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 322,
"image": "mpcl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 355
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: To whom is this letter addressed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "mr. roger jennings",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
499
|
What is the subject of the letter?
|
effect of chemical stimulation on the perception of draw
|
Page 1
R9044.90W
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: <Date>
TO: Mr. Roger Jennings
FROM: J. H. Reynolds
SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw
PROPOSAL NO.
R9044
The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider
your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is
approved, subject to the following modifications:
The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the
reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should
not always be at the left and right of the subjects.
In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those
who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should
be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list"
approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she
takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been
diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.
In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.
Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and
informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.
If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number
above in communications regarding this proposal.
John H. Reynolds,
Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC
51545 1013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 322,
"image": "mpcl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 358
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the letter?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "effect of chemical stimulation on the perception of draw",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
500
|
What is the PROPOSAL NO.?
|
r9044
|
Page 1
R9044.90W
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: <Date>
TO: Mr. Roger Jennings
FROM: J. H. Reynolds
SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw
PROPOSAL NO.
R9044
The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider
your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is
approved, subject to the following modifications:
The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the
reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should
not always be at the left and right of the subjects.
In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those
who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should
be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list"
approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she
takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been
diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.
In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.
Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and
informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.
If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number
above in communications regarding this proposal.
John H. Reynolds,
Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC
51545 1013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 322,
"image": "mpcl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 352
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: What is the PROPOSAL NO.?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "r9044",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
501
|
When did the Human Research Committee meet to consider the proposal?
|
November 27, 1990
|
Page 1
R9044.90W
Page 1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
DATE: <Date>
TO: Mr. Roger Jennings
FROM: J. H. Reynolds
SUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw
PROPOSAL NO.
R9044
The Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider
your proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is
approved, subject to the following modifications:
The experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the
reference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should
not always be at the left and right of the subjects.
In screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those
who may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should
be no direct questions related to these items. You can use a "laundry list"
approach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she
takes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been
diagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.
In addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.
Please see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and
informed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.
If you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number
above in communications regarding this proposal.
John H. Reynolds,
Chairman, RJRT R&D HRRC
51545 1013
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 322,
"image": "mpcl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "mpcl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 360
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nR9044.90W\nPage 1\nINTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM\nDATE: <Date>\nTO: Mr. Roger Jennings\nFROM: J. H. Reynolds\nSUBJECT: Effect of Chemical Stimulation on the Perception of Draw\nPROPOSAL NO.\nR9044\nThe Human Research Review Committee met on November 27, 1990 to consider\nyour proposal. The consensus of the Committee is that your proposal is\napproved, subject to the following modifications:\nThe experimental design should be modified so that the placement of the\nreference standards is balanced, i.e., the high and low references should\nnot always be at the left and right of the subjects.\nIn screening subjects, while precautions must be taken to eliminate those\nwho may be alcoholics, or taking contra-indicated medication, there should\nbe no direct questions related to these items. You can use a \"laundry list\"\napproach in which the subject is cautioned not to participate if he/she\ntakes prescription medication or is undergoing treatment for, or has been\ndiagnosed as being, alcoholic, sensitive to alcohol, etc.\nIn addition, you must obtain informed consent from the participants.\nPlease see Dr. John Robinson for an example of the type of screeners and\ninformed consent forms he has used. They will be helpful to you.\nIf you have questions or comments, please refer to the Proposal Number\nabove in communications regarding this proposal.\nJohn H. Reynolds,\nChairman, RJRT R&D HRRC\n51545 1013\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/mpc10037\n\nQuestion: When did the Human Research Committee meet to consider the proposal?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "November 27, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
502
|
For what does the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for?
|
Cork-on-white tipping
|
Page 2
loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for
cork-on-white tipping.
A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic
tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.
Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard
inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the
flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.
The 8:
flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial
production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping
printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two
lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8
g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.
To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate
inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from
two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were
made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the
filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the
filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink
tipping had 18 flare-up.
Conclusions and Recommendations
From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can
draw the following conclusions:
(1)
filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring
in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;
(2)
low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up
rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into
the filter;
(3)
burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related
to high ink weight on the tipping.
We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate
inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights
with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be
maintained below 3.5 g/m' .
cc :
S. Cline
J. Griffin
D. Sealey
G. Carter
B. Hendricks
T. Sanders
J. Easley
J. Myracle
E. Weston
P. Gauvin
B. Peace
Central Files
-2-
2022155810
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 323,
"image": "xhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 595
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: For what does the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Cork-on-white tipping",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
506
|
When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, what had 5% flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 1% flare-up?
|
the standard Ink tipping
|
Page 2
loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for
cork-on-white tipping.
A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic
tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.
Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard
inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the
flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.
The 8:
flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial
production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping
printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two
lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8
g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.
To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate
inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from
two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were
made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the
filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the
filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink
tipping had 18 flare-up.
Conclusions and Recommendations
From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can
draw the following conclusions:
(1)
filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring
in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;
(2)
low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up
rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into
the filter;
(3)
burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related
to high ink weight on the tipping.
We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate
inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights
with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be
maintained below 3.5 g/m' .
cc :
S. Cline
J. Griffin
D. Sealey
G. Carter
B. Hendricks
T. Sanders
J. Easley
J. Myracle
E. Weston
P. Gauvin
B. Peace
Central Files
-2-
2022155810
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 323,
"image": "xhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 610
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: When the cigarette was smoked into the filter, what had 5% flare-up while the low silicate ink tipping had 1% flare-up?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "the standard Ink tipping",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
507
|
Which inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates?
|
low silicate inks
|
Page 2
loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for
cork-on-white tipping.
A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic
tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.
Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard
inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the
flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.
The 8:
flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial
production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping
printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two
lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8
g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.
To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate
inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from
two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were
made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the
filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the
filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink
tipping had 18 flare-up.
Conclusions and Recommendations
From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can
draw the following conclusions:
(1)
filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring
in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;
(2)
low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up
rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into
the filter;
(3)
burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related
to high ink weight on the tipping.
We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate
inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights
with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be
maintained below 3.5 g/m' .
cc :
S. Cline
J. Griffin
D. Sealey
G. Carter
B. Hendricks
T. Sanders
J. Easley
J. Myracle
E. Weston
P. Gauvin
B. Peace
Central Files
-2-
2022155810
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 323,
"image": "xhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 592
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: Which inks give significantly lower filter flare-up rates?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "low silicate inks",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
508
|
What is the 10 digits number written bold on the paper?
|
2022155810
|
Page 2
loadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for
cork-on-white tipping.
A similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic
tippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.
Flare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard
inks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the
flare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.
The 8:
flare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial
production run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping
printed in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two
lots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8
g/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.
To compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate
inks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from
two of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were
made to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the
filter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the
filter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink
tipping had 18 flare-up.
Conclusions and Recommendations
From the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can
draw the following conclusions:
(1)
filter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring
in the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;
(2)
low silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up
rates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into
the filter;
(3)
burnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related
to high ink weight on the tipping.
We recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate
inks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights
with Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be
maintained below 3.5 g/m' .
cc :
S. Cline
J. Griffin
D. Sealey
G. Carter
B. Hendricks
T. Sanders
J. Easley
J. Myracle
E. Weston
P. Gauvin
B. Peace
Central Files
-2-
2022155810
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 323,
"image": "xhxj0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "xhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 593
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nloadings of 4.2-4.5 g/m , the Bristol tippings have high ink weights for\ncork-on-white tipping.\nA similar test was conducted on cigarettes made with Merit De-Nic\ntippings. Tipping analyses and flare-up results are given in Table 2.\nFlare-up rates of 48 and 8% were obtained for tippings printed with standard\ninks; 28 flare-up was obtained with the low silicate inks. Again all of the\nflare-ups occurred after the smoulder had advanced into the filter.\nThe 8:\nflare-up occurred with a bobbin of tipping printed last year for the initial\nproduction run of Merit De-Nic, and the 48 flare-up rate was for tipping\nprinted in January of this year. A noteworthy difference between the two\nlots is the ink weight, the tipping with the higher ink weight (4.6 vs. 3.8\ng/m' ) giving the higher flare-up rate.\nTo compare flare-up tendencies of the standard and the low silicate\ninks at the tobacco rod/filter junction, the white skirt was removed from\ntwo of the Merit De-Nic tippings (11-373A and 13-676A) and cigarettes were\nmade to Marlboro LS specifications. No flare-ups were obtained at the\nfilter junction for either tipping. When the cigarette was smoked into the\nfilter, the standard ink tipping had 58 flare-up while the low silicate ink\ntipping had 18 flare-up.\nConclusions and Recommendations\nFrom the results of the Bristol and Merit De-Nic tipping tests, we can\ndraw the following conclusions:\n(1)\nfilter flare-up for these cork-on-white tippings is occurring\nin the filter only, not at the tobacco rod/filter junction;\n(2)\nlow silicate inks give significantly lower filter flare-up\nrates than the standard inks when the cigarette is smoked into\nthe filter;\n(3)\nburnback into the filter and subsequent flare-up may be related\nto high ink weight on the tipping.\nWe recommend the initiation of qualification testing for low silicate\ninks on cork-on-white tippings. We also recommend discussing ink weights\nwith Purchasing and the suppliers to determine if ink weight can be\nmaintained below 3.5 g/m' .\ncc :\nS. Cline\nJ. Griffin\nD. Sealey\nG. Carter\nB. Hendricks\nT. Sanders\nJ. Easley\nJ. Myracle\nE. Weston\nP. Gauvin\nB. Peace\nCentral Files\n-2-\n2022155810\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/xhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 10 digits number written bold on the paper?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "2022155810",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
510
|
What is the name of the tobacco company?
|
RJ Reynolds
|
Page 1
RLB
By Reynolds
Interoffice Memorandum
RJR
Subject: Monthly Highlights -
June
SECRET
Date: June 18, 1992
ADDREGGIE ONLY
To: J. D. Phillips
No. 515 By.
From:
M. D. Shannon
PROJECT XC:
CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:
Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod
caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol
was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of
propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and
1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at
98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the
level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an
acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-
activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out
to eighteen weeks for further evaluation.
Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):
Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables
that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the
development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.
Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter
characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-
Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three
different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,
quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,
79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent
position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes
were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean
values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables
studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and
dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two
response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop
increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes
has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows
some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location
of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from
51210 9589
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 325,
"image": "qqbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 699
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the tobacco company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "RJ Reynolds",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
511
|
who is this Interoffice Memorandum addressed to?
|
J. D. Phillips
|
Page 1
RLB
By Reynolds
Interoffice Memorandum
RJR
Subject: Monthly Highlights -
June
SECRET
Date: June 18, 1992
ADDREGGIE ONLY
To: J. D. Phillips
No. 515 By.
From:
M. D. Shannon
PROJECT XC:
CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:
Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod
caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol
was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of
propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and
1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at
98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the
level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an
acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-
activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out
to eighteen weeks for further evaluation.
Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):
Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables
that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the
development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.
Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter
characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-
Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three
different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,
quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,
79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent
position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes
were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean
values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables
studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and
dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two
response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop
increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes
has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows
some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location
of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from
51210 9589
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 325,
"image": "qqbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 702
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: who is this Interoffice Memorandum addressed to?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "J. D. Phillips",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
512
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
June 18, 1992
|
Page 1
RLB
By Reynolds
Interoffice Memorandum
RJR
Subject: Monthly Highlights -
June
SECRET
Date: June 18, 1992
ADDREGGIE ONLY
To: J. D. Phillips
No. 515 By.
From:
M. D. Shannon
PROJECT XC:
CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:
Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod
caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol
was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of
propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and
1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at
98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the
level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an
acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-
activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out
to eighteen weeks for further evaluation.
Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):
Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables
that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the
development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.
Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter
characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-
Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three
different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,
quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,
79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent
position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes
were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean
values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables
studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and
dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two
response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop
increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes
has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows
some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location
of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from
51210 9589
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 325,
"image": "qqbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 700
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "June 18, 1992",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
513
|
What is the title of the second paragraph?
|
even puff-by-puff filter development (eppcat)
|
Page 1
RLB
By Reynolds
Interoffice Memorandum
RJR
Subject: Monthly Highlights -
June
SECRET
Date: June 18, 1992
ADDREGGIE ONLY
To: J. D. Phillips
No. 515 By.
From:
M. D. Shannon
PROJECT XC:
CS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:
Significance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod
caused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol
was implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of
propylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and
1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at
98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the
level of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an
acceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-
activation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out
to eighteen weeks for further evaluation.
Even Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):
Significance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables
that influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the
development of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.
Status: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter
characteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-
Behnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three
different levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,
quadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,
79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent
position was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes
were smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean
values for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables
studied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and
dividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two
response variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop
increases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes
has little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows
some increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location
of the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from
51210 9589
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 325,
"image": "qqbl0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qqbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 708
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRLB\nBy Reynolds\nInteroffice Memorandum\nRJR\nSubject: Monthly Highlights -\nJune\nSECRET\nDate: June 18, 1992\nADDREGGIE ONLY\nTo: J. D. Phillips\nNo. 515 By.\nFrom:\nM. D. Shannon\nPROJECT XC:\nCS (Carbon Scrubbing) Filter:\nSignificance: A previous aging study showed that a contaminant from the tobacco rod\ncaused carbonyl yield to increase ~25% after 6 weeks of aging at 98 F. Propylene glycol\nwas implicated as the contaminant. A new study was designed in which the level of\npropylene glycol was varied. Status: Levels of propylene glycol of 0.44%, 0.90%, and\n1.15% (level currently used in Camel Light) were used in this study. After 6 weeks at\n98.F, the carbonyls of the 1.15% sample increased ~25% as previously observed. At the\nlevel of 0.44%, no increase in the carbonyl yield occurred. These results define an\nacceptable upper limit for propylene glycol and suggest that any problems with de-\nactivation of the carbon can be resolved. Next Steps: The experiment will be carried out\nto eighteen weeks for further evaluation.\nEven Puff-by-Puff Filter Development (EPPCAT):\nSignificance: A designed study has been completed to gain an understanding of variables\nthat influence the performance of the EPPCAT filter. This work will lead to the\ndevelopment of a model to permit accurate control over performance characteristics.\nStatus: A designed experiment was conducted to quantify the importance of three filter\ncharacteristics: filter pressure drop, cigarette air dilution, and vent location. A Box-\nBehnken design was selected in order to evaluate each of the three factors at three\ndifferent levels each. This type of design allowed for the estimation of all main effects,\nquadratic effects, and all linear two-way interactions. Filter pressure drop was set at 69,\n79 and 89 mm water. Cigarette air dilution was set at 0, 20 and 40 per cent. Vent\nposition was fixed at 19, 24, and 29 mm from the filter end of the cigarette. Cigarettes\nwere smoked by FTC conditions with puff-by-puff pad WTPM collected. The mean\nvalues for TOTAL PAD WTPM and PUFF RATIO were the initial response variables\nstudied. PUFF RATIO is determined by summing the WTPM for the first two puffs and\ndividing it by the sum of the WTPM for the last two puffs. Observations for these two\nresponse variables showed that 1) TOTAL PAD WTPM decreases as filter pressure drop\nincreases and decreases as cigarette air dilution increases. The location of the vent holes\nhas little effect. 2) PUFF RATIO increases as filter pressure drop increases and shows\nsome increase as dilution increases for higher pressure drop filters. Again, the location\nof the vent holes had little effect. Average TOTAL PAD WTPM values ranged from\n51210 9589\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qqbl0037\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the second paragraph?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "even puff-by-puff filter development (eppcat)",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
516
|
What is the name of the company?
|
B&W
|
Page 4
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
VICEROY
. .
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.2%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
12.8%
(121)
Rate of Quitting Losses
6.0%
( 72)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
69.6%
( 99)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
0.7%
( 86)
. Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0%
( - )
314002833
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 326,
"image": "rzbj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 165
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nVICEROY\n. .\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.2%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n12.8%\n(121)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n6.0%\n( 72)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n69.6%\n( 99)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n0.7%\n( 86)\n. Share of the 21-25 Segment:\n0%\n( - )\n314002833\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the company?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "B&W",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
517
|
What is the share of the 21-25 segment mentioned?
|
0%
|
Page 4
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
VICEROY
. .
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.2%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
12.8%
(121)
Rate of Quitting Losses
6.0%
( 72)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
69.6%
( 99)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
0.7%
( 86)
. Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0%
( - )
314002833
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 326,
"image": "rzbj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 170
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nVICEROY\n. .\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.2%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n12.8%\n(121)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n6.0%\n( 72)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n69.6%\n( 99)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n0.7%\n( 86)\n. Share of the 21-25 Segment:\n0%\n( - )\n314002833\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the share of the 21-25 segment mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "0%",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
518
|
What is the index value for Retention of Franchise ?
|
(100)
|
Page 4
Consumer Dynamics
B&W
VICEROY
. .
index
. Retention of Franchise:
81.2%
(100)
Rate of Switching Losses
12.8%
(121)
Rate of Quitting Losses
6.0%
( 72)
. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:
69.6%
( 99)
. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:
0.7%
( 86)
. Share of the 21-25 Segment:
0%
( - )
314002833
Source: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 326,
"image": "rzbj0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rzbj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 170
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nConsumer Dynamics\nB&W\nVICEROY\n. .\nindex\n. Retention of Franchise:\n81.2%\n(100)\nRate of Switching Losses\n12.8%\n(121)\nRate of Quitting Losses\n6.0%\n( 72)\n. Single Brand Users in the Franchise:\n69.6%\n( 99)\n. Share of Industry Switchers Gained:\n0.7%\n( 86)\n. Share of the 21-25 Segment:\n0%\n( - )\n314002833\nSource: USMM 1/95-6/95, 12-Month Data\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rzbj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the index value for Retention of Franchise ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "(100)",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
520
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
December 20, 1993
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON
FAX CORRESPONDENCE
FAX NO. 502-568-8335
DATE:
DECEMBER 20, 1993
TO
P. S. WESSEL
CC:
T. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.
N. W. KREMER
D. J. DANT
T. F. RIEHL
D. FRANK
M. R. TAYLOR
P. A. HAYDON
W. L. TELLING
J. L. HENDRICKS
J. D. TONGE
FROM:
J. T. WINEBRENNER
SUBJECT:
TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES
Tom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on
packs in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line
with TIOJ measures
By copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the "next
steps" noted in your November 24 memo.
Regards,
J. T. W.
Atc
6709-44526
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 327,
"image": "klcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "klcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 290
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON\nFAX CORRESPONDENCE\nFAX NO. 502-568-8335\nDATE:\nDECEMBER 20, 1993\nTO\nP. S. WESSEL\nCC:\nT. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.\nN. W. KREMER\nD. J. DANT\nT. F. RIEHL\nD. FRANK\nM. R. TAYLOR\nP. A. HAYDON\nW. L. TELLING\nJ. L. HENDRICKS\nJ. D. TONGE\nFROM:\nJ. T. WINEBRENNER\nSUBJECT:\nTAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES\nTom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on\npacks in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line\nwith TIOJ measures\nBy copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the \"next\nsteps\" noted in your November 24 memo.\nRegards,\nJ. T. W.\nAtc\n6709-44526\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "December 20, 1993",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
522
|
What is the subject of the email?
|
TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON
FAX CORRESPONDENCE
FAX NO. 502-568-8335
DATE:
DECEMBER 20, 1993
TO
P. S. WESSEL
CC:
T. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.
N. W. KREMER
D. J. DANT
T. F. RIEHL
D. FRANK
M. R. TAYLOR
P. A. HAYDON
W. L. TELLING
J. L. HENDRICKS
J. D. TONGE
FROM:
J. T. WINEBRENNER
SUBJECT:
TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES
Tom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on
packs in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line
with TIOJ measures
By copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the "next
steps" noted in your November 24 memo.
Regards,
J. T. W.
Atc
6709-44526
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 327,
"image": "klcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "klcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 294
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON\nFAX CORRESPONDENCE\nFAX NO. 502-568-8335\nDATE:\nDECEMBER 20, 1993\nTO\nP. S. WESSEL\nCC:\nT. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.\nN. W. KREMER\nD. J. DANT\nT. F. RIEHL\nD. FRANK\nM. R. TAYLOR\nP. A. HAYDON\nW. L. TELLING\nJ. L. HENDRICKS\nJ. D. TONGE\nFROM:\nJ. T. WINEBRENNER\nSUBJECT:\nTAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES\nTom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on\npacks in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line\nwith TIOJ measures\nBy copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the \"next\nsteps\" noted in your November 24 memo.\nRegards,\nJ. T. W.\nAtc\n6709-44526\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the email?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
523
|
What is the name of the person in the "FROM" field?
|
J. T. WINEBRENNER
|
Page 1
B&W
BROWN & WILLIAMSON
FAX CORRESPONDENCE
FAX NO. 502-568-8335
DATE:
DECEMBER 20, 1993
TO
P. S. WESSEL
CC:
T. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.
N. W. KREMER
D. J. DANT
T. F. RIEHL
D. FRANK
M. R. TAYLOR
P. A. HAYDON
W. L. TELLING
J. L. HENDRICKS
J. D. TONGE
FROM:
J. T. WINEBRENNER
SUBJECT:
TAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES
Tom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on
packs in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line
with TIOJ measures
By copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the "next
steps" noted in your November 24 memo.
Regards,
J. T. W.
Atc
6709-44526
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 327,
"image": "klcj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "klcj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 301
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nB&W\nBROWN & WILLIAMSON\nFAX CORRESPONDENCE\nFAX NO. 502-568-8335\nDATE:\nDECEMBER 20, 1993\nTO\nP. S. WESSEL\nCC:\nT. E. WHITEHAIR, JR.\nN. W. KREMER\nD. J. DANT\nT. F. RIEHL\nD. FRANK\nM. R. TAYLOR\nP. A. HAYDON\nW. L. TELLING\nJ. L. HENDRICKS\nJ. D. TONGE\nFROM:\nJ. T. WINEBRENNER\nSUBJECT:\nTAR/NICOTINE DELIVERIES\nTom Whitehair and I agree with your recommendation to change the printed deliveries on\npacks in Japan in order to be more competitive and to ensure deliveries are more in line\nwith TIOJ measures\nBy copy of this, I'd like Bert Kremer and the IBM Group to follow up with the \"next\nsteps\" noted in your November 24 memo.\nRegards,\nJ. T. W.\nAtc\n6709-44526\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/klcj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the name of the person in the \"FROM\" field?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "J. T. WINEBRENNER",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
525
|
What is the Ecusta of Cig. Code 498062 mentioned in RIP-6?
|
6I/6
|
Page 3
RIP - 6
Cig. Code
B&W
Ecusta
498057
41/6
61/6
498058
61/6
51/6
498059
41/6
61/6
498060
51/6
51/6
498061
51/6
61/6
498062
61/6
61/6
RIP-4
Cig. Code
B&W
Ecusta
498057
11/5SE
31/INI/2SE
498058
11/SSE
11/INI/4SE
498059
6SE
6NI
498060
6SE
2NI/4SE
498061
6SE
INI/5SE
498062
6SE
4NI/2SE
584100575
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 341,
"image": "rncj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 227
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nRIP - 6\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n41/6\n61/6\n498058\n61/6\n51/6\n498059\n41/6\n61/6\n498060\n51/6\n51/6\n498061\n51/6\n61/6\n498062\n61/6\n61/6\nRIP-4\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n11/5SE\n31/INI/2SE\n498058\n11/SSE\n11/INI/4SE\n498059\n6SE\n6NI\n498060\n6SE\n2NI/4SE\n498061\n6SE\nINI/5SE\n498062\n6SE\n4NI/2SE\n584100575\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Ecusta of Cig. Code 498062 mentioned in RIP-6?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "6I/6",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
526
|
What is the 9 digits number mentioned in bold?
|
584100575
|
Page 3
RIP - 6
Cig. Code
B&W
Ecusta
498057
41/6
61/6
498058
61/6
51/6
498059
41/6
61/6
498060
51/6
51/6
498061
51/6
61/6
498062
61/6
61/6
RIP-4
Cig. Code
B&W
Ecusta
498057
11/5SE
31/INI/2SE
498058
11/SSE
11/INI/4SE
498059
6SE
6NI
498060
6SE
2NI/4SE
498061
6SE
INI/5SE
498062
6SE
4NI/2SE
584100575
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 341,
"image": "rncj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 218
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nRIP - 6\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n41/6\n61/6\n498058\n61/6\n51/6\n498059\n41/6\n61/6\n498060\n51/6\n51/6\n498061\n51/6\n61/6\n498062\n61/6\n61/6\nRIP-4\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n11/5SE\n31/INI/2SE\n498058\n11/SSE\n11/INI/4SE\n498059\n6SE\n6NI\n498060\n6SE\n2NI/4SE\n498061\n6SE\nINI/5SE\n498062\n6SE\n4NI/2SE\n584100575\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned in bold?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "584100575",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
527
|
Cig. Code 498062 and B&W 6SE is mentioned in which RIP?
|
RIP-4
|
Page 3
RIP - 6
Cig. Code
B&W
Ecusta
498057
41/6
61/6
498058
61/6
51/6
498059
41/6
61/6
498060
51/6
51/6
498061
51/6
61/6
498062
61/6
61/6
RIP-4
Cig. Code
B&W
Ecusta
498057
11/5SE
31/INI/2SE
498058
11/SSE
11/INI/4SE
498059
6SE
6NI
498060
6SE
2NI/4SE
498061
6SE
INI/5SE
498062
6SE
4NI/2SE
584100575
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 341,
"image": "rncj0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "rncj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 228
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nRIP - 6\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n41/6\n61/6\n498058\n61/6\n51/6\n498059\n41/6\n61/6\n498060\n51/6\n51/6\n498061\n51/6\n61/6\n498062\n61/6\n61/6\nRIP-4\nCig. Code\nB&W\nEcusta\n498057\n11/5SE\n31/INI/2SE\n498058\n11/SSE\n11/INI/4SE\n498059\n6SE\n6NI\n498060\n6SE\n2NI/4SE\n498061\n6SE\nINI/5SE\n498062\n6SE\n4NI/2SE\n584100575\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/rncj0037\n\nQuestion: Cig. Code 498062 and B&W 6SE is mentioned in which RIP?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "RIP-4",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
528
|
What is the title of the document?
|
KOOL ULTRA KS / 100
|
Page 10
B&W
KOOL ULTRA KS / 100
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100
Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among
Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers
Dupont Results
. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers
. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra
Smokers
399000387
Status
. KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On
The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results
DMPS
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 328,
"image": "hyhk0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 222
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the title of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "KOOL ULTRA KS / 100",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
529
|
Which is more superior out of Ultra KS Prototype or Salem Ultra 100 among rep mentol ultra smokers?
|
Ultra KS Prototype
|
Page 10
B&W
KOOL ULTRA KS / 100
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100
Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among
Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers
Dupont Results
. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers
. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra
Smokers
399000387
Status
. KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On
The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results
DMPS
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 328,
"image": "hyhk0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 231
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: Which is more superior out of Ultra KS Prototype or Salem Ultra 100 among rep mentol ultra smokers?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Ultra KS Prototype",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
530
|
KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The?
|
The Kool LTS KS CPT results
|
Page 10
B&W
KOOL ULTRA KS / 100
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100
Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among
Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers
Dupont Results
. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers
. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra
Smokers
399000387
Status
. KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On
The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results
DMPS
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 328,
"image": "hyhk0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 235
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On The Acceptability Of The?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "The Kool LTS KS CPT results",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
531
|
What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?
|
399000387
|
Page 10
B&W
KOOL ULTRA KS / 100
Objective
. Using KOOL "C" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100
Products That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among
Rep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers
Dupont Results
. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL "C", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
Superior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers
. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL "C", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was
At Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra
Smokers
399000387
Status
. KOOL "C" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On
The Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results
DMPS
Source: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 328,
"image": "hyhk0037_10.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "10"
}
| 222
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 10\nB&W\nKOOL ULTRA KS / 100\nObjective\n. Using KOOL \"C\" Technologies, Develop KOOL Ultra KS/100\nProducts That Test At Parity Or Better To Salem Ultra Among\nRep Menthol Ultra LTS Smokers\nDupont Results\n. Ultra KS Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 5.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nSuperior To Salem Ultra KS Among Rep Menthol Ultra Smokers\n. Ultra 100 Prototype (KOOL \"C\", 6.0 Tar, 0.80% Menthol) Was\nAt Parity With Salem Ultra 100 Among Rep Menthol Ultra\nSmokers\n399000387\nStatus\n. KOOL \"C\" With Conventional Filter Will Be Adopted Based On\nThe Acceptability Of The KOOL LTS KS CPT Results\nDMPS\nSource: http's://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "399000387",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
532
|
What is the first line of the address mentioned at the top?
|
Reynolds Building
|
Page 1
RJReynolds
Reynolds Building
4th and Main Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
FACT SHEET
Camel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends
May 4, 2000
Camel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along
with a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos
- an innovation that pioneered the first "truly American" cigarette and what is known
today as the "American blend."
Anything that deserves to be called "a classic" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car,
or clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. "A
classic" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also
appeals to a modern sense of style and taste
Camel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different
decades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a
timeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own.
Camel has been a "Pleasure to Burn Since 1913."
Camel's latest advertising campaign, "Pleasure to Burn," spans decades of the
brand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of
today's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also
keeps up with the times.
The ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of
the old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a "retro" feel, but a
second look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective
wears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady
reminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone.
-more-
52522 2172
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 329,
"image": "tynx0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 436
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRJReynolds\nReynolds Building\n4th and Main Street\nWinston-Salem, NC 27102\nFACT SHEET\nCamel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends\nMay 4, 2000\nCamel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along\nwith a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos\n- an innovation that pioneered the first \"truly American\" cigarette and what is known\ntoday as the \"American blend.\"\nAnything that deserves to be called \"a classic\" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car,\nor clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. \"A\nclassic\" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also\nappeals to a modern sense of style and taste\nCamel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different\ndecades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a\ntimeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own.\nCamel has been a \"Pleasure to Burn Since 1913.\"\nCamel's latest advertising campaign, \"Pleasure to Burn,\" spans decades of the\nbrand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of\ntoday's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also\nkeeps up with the times.\nThe ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of\nthe old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a \"retro\" feel, but a\nsecond look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective\nwears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady\nreminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone.\n-more-\n52522 2172\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: What is the first line of the address mentioned at the top?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Reynolds Building",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
533
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
May 4, 2000
|
Page 1
RJReynolds
Reynolds Building
4th and Main Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
FACT SHEET
Camel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends
May 4, 2000
Camel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along
with a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos
- an innovation that pioneered the first "truly American" cigarette and what is known
today as the "American blend."
Anything that deserves to be called "a classic" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car,
or clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. "A
classic" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also
appeals to a modern sense of style and taste
Camel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different
decades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a
timeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own.
Camel has been a "Pleasure to Burn Since 1913."
Camel's latest advertising campaign, "Pleasure to Burn," spans decades of the
brand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of
today's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also
keeps up with the times.
The ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of
the old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a "retro" feel, but a
second look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective
wears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady
reminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone.
-more-
52522 2172
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 329,
"image": "tynx0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "tynx0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 432
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nRJReynolds\nReynolds Building\n4th and Main Street\nWinston-Salem, NC 27102\nFACT SHEET\nCamel Positioning; CML; Exotic Blends\nMay 4, 2000\nCamel is a classic, American brand. In 1913, Camel cigarettes were introduced along\nwith a new idea in cigarette smoking - the blending of Turkish and domestic tobaccos\n- an innovation that pioneered the first \"truly American\" cigarette and what is known\ntoday as the \"American blend.\"\nAnything that deserves to be called \"a classic\" - whether it's a cigarette brand, a car,\nor clothing - earns that title by having a prestigious history and contemporary flair. \"A\nclassic\" is something that made its mark on different times and cultures, but also\nappeals to a modern sense of style and taste\nCamel is one of the few cigarette brands that can celebrate many different\ndecades of popularity, a history of different times and cultures. Camel has a\ntimeless heritage that few other cigarette brands can own.\nCamel has been a \"Pleasure to Burn Since 1913.\"\nCamel's latest advertising campaign, \"Pleasure to Burn,\" spans decades of the\nbrand's popularity by including elements of past eras along with symbols of\ntoday's lifestyle, thus positioning Camel as a brand with a rich heritage that also\nkeeps up with the times.\nThe ads depict moments of smoking pleasure with interesting juxtapositions of\nthe old and the new. At first glimpse, the ads appear to have a \"retro\" feel, but a\nsecond look reveals utterly modern elements. For example, a male detective\nwears a classic hat and trench coat, but sports an earring; and a lady\nreminiscent of past eras chats on a cell phone.\n-more-\n52522 2172\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/tynx0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "May 4, 2000",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
536
|
To whom is this letter addressed?
|
W.E.Claflin
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To:
W. E. Claflin
Date: June 19, 1990
From::
B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton
C90-03342
Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument
The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has
been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications
made to that instrument relative to the original design.
Modifications to the Hood:
A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and
constructed in the R&DD Shop.
1.
The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced
by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.
2.
The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were
replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables
easier and more frequent window replacement.
3.
The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of
solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.
4..
The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in
this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes
for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood
skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.
5.
The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)
to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:
few runs after the machine has been idle for some time.
Modifications in Flow Measurement:
1.
A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit
line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.
2022156305
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 331,
"image": "sxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 463
|
none
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: To whom is this letter addressed?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "W.E.Claflin",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
537
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
June 19, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To:
W. E. Claflin
Date: June 19, 1990
From::
B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton
C90-03342
Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument
The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has
been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications
made to that instrument relative to the original design.
Modifications to the Hood:
A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and
constructed in the R&DD Shop.
1.
The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced
by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.
2.
The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were
replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables
easier and more frequent window replacement.
3.
The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of
solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.
4..
The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in
this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes
for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood
skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.
5.
The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)
to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:
few runs after the machine has been idle for some time.
Modifications in Flow Measurement:
1.
A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit
line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.
2022156305
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 331,
"image": "sxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 463
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "June 19, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
538
|
What is the subject of the document?
|
Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To:
W. E. Claflin
Date: June 19, 1990
From::
B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton
C90-03342
Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument
The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has
been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications
made to that instrument relative to the original design.
Modifications to the Hood:
A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and
constructed in the R&DD Shop.
1.
The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced
by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.
2.
The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were
replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables
easier and more frequent window replacement.
3.
The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of
solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.
4..
The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in
this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes
for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood
skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.
5.
The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)
to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:
few runs after the machine has been idle for some time.
Modifications in Flow Measurement:
1.
A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit
line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.
2022156305
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 331,
"image": "sxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 468
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the subject of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
539
|
What is the date mentioned in the document ?
|
June 19, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.
INTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
To:
W. E. Claflin
Date: June 19, 1990
From::
B. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton
C90-03342
Subject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument
The second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has
been installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications
made to that instrument relative to the original design.
Modifications to the Hood:
A modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and
constructed in the R&DD Shop.
1.
The discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced
by a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.
2.
The four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were
replaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables
easier and more frequent window replacement.
3.
The front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of
solid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.
4..
The string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in
this application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes
for them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood
skirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.
5.
The application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)
to the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:
few runs after the machine has been idle for some time.
Modifications in Flow Measurement:
1.
A 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit
line from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.
2022156305
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 331,
"image": "sxxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "sxxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 466
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS! U. S. A.\nINTER - OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\nTo:\nW. E. Claflin\nDate: June 19, 1990\nFrom::\nB. C. LaRoy & A. T. Burton\nC90-03342\nSubject: Modifications to Eight-Port Sidestream Instrument\nThe second eight-port apparatus for the measurement of sidestream smoke visibility has\nbeen installed in the Cigarette Technology Division. This memo outlines the modifications\nmade to that instrument relative to the original design.\nModifications to the Hood:\nA modified Lexan@ hood was designed by Jim Washington and Ingrid Messner and\nconstructed in the R&DD Shop.\n1.\nThe discrete smoke exit ports at the top of the original hood design were replaced\nby a slot and baffle design in order to achieve more uniform flow.\n2.\nThe four cemented-in-place laser beam windows of the original design were\nreplaced with microscope cover slips held in place by spring clips. This enables\neasier and more frequent window replacement.\n3.\nThe front panel of the new hood is removable, while the original design was of\nsolid (cemented) construction: The modification facilitates cleaning.\n4..\nThe string cutoff posts supplied on the Filtrona smoking machine are not used in\nthis application. These posts were removed during the modification and the holes\nfor them were eliminated from the new hood design.. This allows the rear hood\nskirt to be hinged for easier replacement of the Cambridge filter pad holders.\n5.\nThe application of a commercial anti-static compound (Merix Chemical #79OL)\nto the hood interior was instituted to reduce drifts in attenuator during the first:\nfew runs after the machine has been idle for some time.\nModifications in Flow Measurement:\n1.\nA 0.65 micron cartridge filter (Pall #MCY10010007) was placed in the air exit\nline from the hood to reduce TPM deposits in the flow control valves.\n2022156305\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/sxxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned in the document ?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "June 19, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
540
|
Heading of the document?
|
Kool Improvement
|
Page 3
B&W
KOOL IMPROVEMENT
Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating
Various Technologies
Project Basis Technologies
. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)
. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)
. Increased Humectants
. Increased Menthol Levels
. New Cigarette Designs
399000380
KOOL "C"
DMP
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 332,
"image": "hyhk0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 112
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Kool Improvement",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
541
|
How many samples were produced?
|
Over 300
|
Page 3
B&W
KOOL IMPROVEMENT
Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating
Various Technologies
Project Basis Technologies
. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)
. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)
. Increased Humectants
. Increased Menthol Levels
. New Cigarette Designs
399000380
KOOL "C"
DMP
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 332,
"image": "hyhk0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 113
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: How many samples were produced?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Over 300",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
542
|
What is the third point mentioned in Project Basis Technologies?
|
Increased Humectants
|
Page 3
B&W
KOOL IMPROVEMENT
Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating
Various Technologies
Project Basis Technologies
. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)
. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)
. Increased Humectants
. Increased Menthol Levels
. New Cigarette Designs
399000380
KOOL "C"
DMP
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 332,
"image": "hyhk0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 119
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the third point mentioned in Project Basis Technologies?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Increased Humectants",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
543
|
What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left border at the bottom?
|
399000380
|
Page 3
B&W
KOOL IMPROVEMENT
Over 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating
Various Technologies
Project Basis Technologies
. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)
. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)
. Increased Humectants
. Increased Menthol Levels
. New Cigarette Designs
399000380
KOOL "C"
DMP
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 332,
"image": "hyhk0037_3.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "3"
}
| 123
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 3\nB&W\nKOOL IMPROVEMENT\nOver 300 Samples Were Produced Evaluating\nVarious Technologies\nProject Basis Technologies\n. New Blend (XLF - 1088G)\n. Ammoniated Recon (EBR)\n. Increased Humectants\n. Increased Menthol Levels\n. New Cigarette Designs\n399000380\nKOOL \"C\"\nDMP\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left border at the bottom?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "399000380",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
544
|
What is the Objective of the document?
|
Develop a Kool KS Product that is superior to Newport among Kool KS Smokers
|
Page 4
B&W
KOOL KS
Objective
. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport
Among KOOL KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And
Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers
. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable,
More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.
Menthol Taste Than Newport
399000381
KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented
In 1993
DMP4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 333,
"image": "hyhk0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 181
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the Objective of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Develop a Kool KS Product that is superior to Newport among Kool KS Smokers",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
545
|
When was the KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Implemented?
|
1993
|
Page 4
B&W
KOOL KS
Objective
. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport
Among KOOL KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And
Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers
. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable,
More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.
Menthol Taste Than Newport
399000381
KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented
In 1993
DMP4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 333,
"image": "hyhk0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 176
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: When was the KOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Implemented?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "1993",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
546
|
Heading of the document?
|
Kool KS
|
Page 4
B&W
KOOL KS
Objective
. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport
Among KOOL KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And
Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers
. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable,
More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.
Menthol Taste Than Newport
399000381
KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented
In 1993
DMP4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 333,
"image": "hyhk0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 164
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: Heading of the document?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Kool KS",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
547
|
What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?
|
399000381
|
Page 4
B&W
KOOL KS
Objective
. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport
Among KOOL KS Smokers
CPT Results
. KOOL "C" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And
Newport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers
. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL "C" To Be More Likable,
More Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.
Menthol Taste Than Newport
399000381
KOOL "C" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented
In 1993
DMP4
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 333,
"image": "hyhk0037_4.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hyhk0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "4"
}
| 172
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 4\nB&W\nKOOL KS\nObjective\n. Develop A KOOL KS Product That Is Superior To Newport\nAmong KOOL KS Smokers\nCPT Results\n. KOOL \"C\" Was Superior To Current KOOL KS And\nNewport KS Among KOOL KS And Newport Smokers\n. KOOL KS Smokers Found KOOL \"C\" To Be More Likable,\nMore Satisfying, Smoother, And To Have More And Better.\nMenthol Taste Than Newport\n399000381\nKOOL \"C\" With 0.51% Menthol Was Implemented\nIn 1993\nDMP4\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hyhk0037\n\nQuestion: What is the 9 digits number mentioned on the left margin?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "399000381",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
548
|
What is the STRAIN TA100,REV/CIG of G7-25 with 1.0% turkish extract?
|
12621
|
Page 2
RESULTS
STRAIN TABB
STRAIN TA100
REV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR
Control: G7-25
1173
13841
1051
12402
G7-25 with 0.5%
1124
13713
994
12127
turkish extract
G7-25 with 0.75%
1235
13709
942
10456
turkish extract
G7-25 with 1.0%
1238
14361
1088
12621
turkish extract
Control: Low extract
1226
13731
918
10282
G7 shee
Low extract G7 with
1482
17191
1094
12690
0.5% turkish extract
Low extract G7 with
1206
14231
932
10998
0.75% turkish extract
Low extract G7 with
1430
17017
946
11257
1.0% turkish extract
Sample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis.
There were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and,
there were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the
turkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory.
Cindy
Cindy Fulp
XC:
Dr. C.K. Lee
Dr. D.J. Doolittle
Dr. D.C. Rees:
51003 0968
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 335,
"image": "hgbl0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 387
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nRESULTS\nSTRAIN TABB\nSTRAIN TA100\nREV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR\nControl: G7-25\n1173\n13841\n1051\n12402\nG7-25 with 0.5%\n1124\n13713\n994\n12127\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 0.75%\n1235\n13709\n942\n10456\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 1.0%\n1238\n14361\n1088\n12621\nturkish extract\nControl: Low extract\n1226\n13731\n918\n10282\nG7 shee\nLow extract G7 with\n1482\n17191\n1094\n12690\n0.5% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1206\n14231\n932\n10998\n0.75% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1430\n17017\n946\n11257\n1.0% turkish extract\nSample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis.\nThere were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and,\nthere were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the\nturkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory.\nCindy\nCindy Fulp\nXC:\nDr. C.K. Lee\nDr. D.J. Doolittle\nDr. D.C. Rees:\n51003 0968\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the STRAIN TA100,REV/CIG of G7-25 with 1.0% turkish extract?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "12621",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
549
|
What is the sample of the STRAIN TA100, REV/MG TAR 1094?
|
Low extract G7 with 0.5% turkish extract
|
Page 2
RESULTS
STRAIN TABB
STRAIN TA100
REV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR
Control: G7-25
1173
13841
1051
12402
G7-25 with 0.5%
1124
13713
994
12127
turkish extract
G7-25 with 0.75%
1235
13709
942
10456
turkish extract
G7-25 with 1.0%
1238
14361
1088
12621
turkish extract
Control: Low extract
1226
13731
918
10282
G7 shee
Low extract G7 with
1482
17191
1094
12690
0.5% turkish extract
Low extract G7 with
1206
14231
932
10998
0.75% turkish extract
Low extract G7 with
1430
17017
946
11257
1.0% turkish extract
Sample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis.
There were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and,
there were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the
turkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory.
Cindy
Cindy Fulp
XC:
Dr. C.K. Lee
Dr. D.J. Doolittle
Dr. D.C. Rees:
51003 0968
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 335,
"image": "hgbl0037_2.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "hgbl0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "2"
}
| 391
|
fuzzy
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 2\nRESULTS\nSTRAIN TABB\nSTRAIN TA100\nREV/MG TAR | REV/CIG | REV/MG TAR\nControl: G7-25\n1173\n13841\n1051\n12402\nG7-25 with 0.5%\n1124\n13713\n994\n12127\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 0.75%\n1235\n13709\n942\n10456\nturkish extract\nG7-25 with 1.0%\n1238\n14361\n1088\n12621\nturkish extract\nControl: Low extract\n1226\n13731\n918\n10282\nG7 shee\nLow extract G7 with\n1482\n17191\n1094\n12690\n0.5% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1206\n14231\n932\n10998\n0.75% turkish extract\nLow extract G7 with\n1430\n17017\n946\n11257\n1.0% turkish extract\nSample groups were statistically compared on both a revertant/mg tar and a revertant/cigarette basis.\nThere were no significant differences detected among products using G7-25 and the turkish extract; and,\nthere were no significant differences detected among products using the low extract G7 sheet and the\nturkish extract. Direct any questions regarding this data to the Ames laboratory.\nCindy\nCindy Fulp\nXC:\nDr. C.K. Lee\nDr. D.J. Doolittle\nDr. D.C. Rees:\n51003 0968\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/hgb10037\n\nQuestion: What is the sample of the STRAIN TA100, REV/MG TAR 1094?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "Low extract G7 with 0.5% turkish extract",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
551
|
What is the date mentioned?
|
May 29, 1990
|
Page 1
PHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.
INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE
Richmond, Virginia
6502
C90-03100
To:
R. Ferguson
Date: May 29, 1990
From:
F. HSU 1 -
Subject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990
During May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic
and Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &
Waste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were
divided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four
concurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held
involving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling
equipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap
prevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary
of presentations grouped by specific subjects.
SUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)
As in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample
preparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical
techniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used
supercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex
Corp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent
removal and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction
time resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of
SFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic
modifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from
different matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of
matrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-
line operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar
modifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application
particularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A
threshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be
defined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke
analysis system is potentially possible.
Some sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer
(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,
pesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very
effective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids
2022155944
Source: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037
| 1
|
{
"doc_id": 336,
"image": "qhxj0037_1.png",
"ucsf_document_id": "qhxj0037",
"ucsf_document_page_no": "1"
}
| 657
|
exact
|
[
{
"content": "Document:\nPage 1\nPHILIP MORRIS U. S. A.\nINTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE\nRichmond, Virginia\n6502\nC90-03100\nTo:\nR. Ferguson\nDate: May 29, 1990\nFrom:\nF. HSU 1 -\nSubject: EPA/AWMA International Symposium, 1990\nDuring May 1 - 4, I attended the International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic\nand Related Air Pollutants sponsored by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Air &\nWaste Management Association (AWMA) at Raleigh, North Carolina. The presentations were\ndivided into 20 sessions and each devoted to a specific topic. There were either three or four\nconcurrent sessions held in the morning and afternoon. An instrument exhibit was also held\ninvolving about 65 vendors ranging from contract services, environmental sampling\nequipments to analytical instrumentation. As in any multi-session meeting, time overlap\nprevented the complete coverage all the presentations of interest. The following is a summary\nof presentations grouped by specific subjects.\nSUPERCRITICAL FLUID EXTRACTIONS (SFE)\nAs in other branches of science, the application of SFE in environmental sample\npreparation has become increasingly popular in replacing or complimenting the classical\ntechniques such as Soxhlet extraction and thermal desorption. Most of the experiments used\nsupercritical carbon dioxide. The advantages in using SFE, as pointed out by J. Levy (Suprex\nCorp.), were increased extraction efficiency, selectivity, shorter extraction time, ease of solvent\nremoval and the mild extraction conditions. The increased efficiency and reduced extraction\ntime resulted from the unique physical property of the supercritical fluids. The selectivity of\nSFE can be controlled by varying the density/temperature of the liquids, adding polar organic\nmodifiers, selecting different SFE liquids and derivatization. Extraction of pollutants from\ndifferent matrices were shown to exemplify the versatility of the technique and the effect of\nmatrix on the extraction efficiency. SFE also offers the options for on-line (SFE-GC) and off-\nline operating modes. However, for extraction of more polar solutes, the addition of polar\nmodifiers in the fluids imposes some limits for the on-line operation. One SFE application\nparticularly interesting to myself is the capability of class (functional group) fractionation. A\nthreshold density at which the solubility of a class of compounds maximizes needs to be\ndefined experimentally. With pressure programming and SFE-GC, an automated smoke\nanalysis system is potentially possible.\nSome sorbent media were tested for SFE of air toxics by several authors. J. Raymer\n(Research Triangle Institute, NC) extracted Tenax and Polyimides loaded with semi-volatiles,\npesticides and PAH's with supercritical CO, . He concluded that supercritical CO, was very\neffective in recovering the target compounds from Tenax. Higher volume of fluids or fluids\n2022155944\nSource: https://www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/docs/qhxj0037\n\nQuestion: What is the date mentioned?",
"role": "user"
},
{
"content": "May 29, 1990",
"role": "assistant"
}
] |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.