text stringlengths 649 4.42k | synonym_substitution stringlengths 759 4.5k | butter_fingers stringlengths 649 4.42k | random_deletion stringlengths 453 2.31k | change_char_case stringlengths 649 4.42k | whitespace_perturbation stringlengths 764 5.02k | underscore_trick stringlengths 649 4.42k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$h_{5[1,2]}\left( x^{i}\right) $ stated by boundary conditions;
b\) or, inversely, to compute $h_{4}$ for a given $h_{5}\left( x^{i},v\right)
,h_{5}^{\ast }\neq 0,$$$\sqrt{|h_{4}|}=h_{[0]}\left( x^{i}\right) (\sqrt{|h_{5}\left( x^{i},v\right) |})^{\ast }, \label{p1}$$with $h_{[0]}\left( x^{i}\right) $ given b... | $ h_{5[1,2]}\left (x^{i}\right) $ stated by boundary conditions;
b\) or, inversely, to compute $ h_{4}$ for a given $ h_{5}\left (x^{i},v\right)
, h_{5}^{\ast } \neq 0,$$$\sqrt{|h_{4}|}=h_{[0]}\left (x^{i}\right) (\sqrt{|h_{5}\left (x^{i},v\right) |})^{\ast }, \label{p1}$$with $ h_{[0]}\left (x^{i}\right) ... | $h_{5[1,2]}\lfft( x^{i}\right) $ stated by buundary conditions;
u\) or, inbersely, go compute $h_{4}$ for a given $h_{5}\leht( x^{u},v\rigyt)
,h_{5}^{\ast }\neq 0,$$$\sqrt{|h_{4}|}=h_{[0]}\lewt( x^{i}\righn) (\sqrt{|h_{5}\ledt( x^{m},v\right) |})^{\ast }, \lausl{p1}$$with $h_{[0]}\left( w^{i}\rigkt) $ given b... | $h_{5[1,2]}\left( x^{i}\right) $ stated by boundary conditions; inversely, compute $h_{4}$ a given $h_{5}\left( (\sqrt{|h_{5}\left( |})^{\ast }, \label{p1}$$with x^{i}\right) $ given boundary conditions. - The exact solutions (\[ep3a\]) for $\beta \neq 0$ are defined from an algebraic equation, $w_{i}\beta +\alpha wher... | $h_{5[1,2]}\left( x^{i}\right) $ stated by boundAry conditiOns;
b\) oR, inVerSeLy, to CompUte $h_{4}$ for a given $h_{5}\LEft( x^{I},v\right)
,h_{5}^{\ast }\neq 0,$$$\sqrt{|h_{4}|}=h_{[0]}\leFt( x^{i}\rIgHT) (\sqrT{|H_{5}\lEft( x^{i},V\right) |})^{\aST }, \lABEl{p1}$$WiTh $H_{[0]}\leFt( X^{I}\rIght) $ gIveN b... | $h_{5[1,2]}\left( x^{i}\r ight) $ st atedbybou nd arycond itions;
b \ ) or , inversely, to comput e $h_ {4 } $ fo r a give n $h_{5 } \l e f t(x^ {i },v \r i gh t)
,h _{5}^{\ ast }\neq0,$ $$ \sqrt{|h_{4} | }= h_{[0]}\le ft( x^{i}\right ) ( \sqrt{ |h _{5 } \left ( x ^{i}, v\righ t ) |})^ {\ast }, \ l abel{p 1 ... | $h_{5[1,2]}\left(_x^{i}\right) $_stated by boundary conditions;
_ __b\) or,_inversely,_to compute $h_{4}$_for a given_$h_{5}\left( x^{i},v\right)
_,h_{5}^{\ast }\neq 0,$$$\sqrt{|h_{4}|}=h_{[0]}\left(_x^{i}\right)_(\sqrt{|h_{5}\left( x^{i},v\right) |})^{\ast }, \label{p1}$$with $h_{[0]}\left( x^{i}\right) $ given b... |
mathsf{C}}}$, $deg(u_i) \geq 2\delta_s+1$. Therefore we can use the simple coding scheme described in Section \[sec:simple\_coding\] on $(m_{{\mathsf{C}}},n_{{\mathsf{C}}},{\mathcal{X}}_{{\mathsf{C}}},\delta_s)$ BNSI problem to save one transmission compared to uncoded transmission. Therefore the length of this code to... | mathsf{C}}}$, $ deg(u_i) \geq 2\delta_s+1$. Therefore we can use the simple coding schema trace in Section \[sec: simple\_coding\ ] on $ (m_{{\mathsf{C}}},n_{{\mathsf{C}}},{\mathcal{X}}_{{\mathsf{C}}},\delta_s)$ BNSI problem to save one transmission compare to uncoded transmission. Therefore the distance of this code... | matjsf{C}}}$, $deg(u_i) \geq 2\delta_s+1$. Thtrefore we can usg rhe sikple ckding scfeme described in Section \[sec:dinple\_ciding\] on $(m_{{\mathsf{C}}},n_{{\mathrf{C}}},{\mathcap{X}}_{{\mathsf{X}}},\delua_s)$ BNSI problem vk save one trzksmisvmon compared to uncoded tsansmission. Thardflre the length of this code to... | mathsf{C}}}$, $deg(u_i) \geq 2\delta_s+1$. Therefore we can simple scheme described Section \[sec:simple\_coding\] on one compared to uncoded Therefore the length this code to transmit all the symbols indexed by ${\mathsf{C}}\subseteq [n]$ over ${\mathds{F}}_q$ is $N_{{\mathsf{C}}}=|{\mathsf{C}}|-1$. For some integer $... | mathsf{C}}}$, $deg(u_i) \geq 2\delta_s+1$. TherEfore we can Use thE siMplE cOdinG schEme described in sEctiOn \[sec:simple\_coding\] on $(m_{{\maThsf{C}}},N_{{\mAThsf{c}}},{\MaThcal{x}}_{{\mathsf{c}}},\DeLTA_s)$ BnSi pRobLeM To Save oNe tRansmisSion comparEd tO uNcoded transmISsIon. TherefoRe tHe length of thIs cOde to... | mathsf{C}}}$, $deg(u_i) \g eq 2\delta _s+1$ . T her ef orewe c an use the sim p le c oding scheme described in S ec t ion\ [s ec:si mple\_c o di n g \]on $ (m_ {{ \ ma thsf{ C}} },n_{{\ mathsf{C}} },{ \m athcal{X}}_{ { \m athsf{C}}} ,\d elta_s)$ BNS I p roblem t o s a ve on e t ransm ission compar ed to unc od e d t... | mathsf{C}}}$, $deg(u_i)_\geq 2\delta_s+1$._Therefore we can use_the simple_coding_scheme described_in_Section \[sec:simple\_coding\] on $(m_{{\mathsf{C}}},n_{{\mathsf{C}}},{\mathcal{X}}_{{\mathsf{C}}},\delta_s)$_BNSI problem to_save one transmission compared_to uncoded transmission._Therefore_the length of this code to... |
, parallelizable, compact Riemannian $n$-manifold can be embedded isometrically as a special Lagrangian submanifold in a manifold with holonomy ${\mathrm{SU}}(n)$.
Notice that the assumption of real analyticity refers not only to the manifold, but to the structure as well.
$\alpha$-Einstein-Sasaki geometry and hypers... | , parallelizable, compact Riemannian $ n$-manifold can be embedded isometrically as a special Lagrangian submanifold in a manifold with holonomy $ { \mathrm{SU}}(n)$.
Notice that the premise of veridical analyticity refers not only to the manifold, but to the structure equally well.
$ \alpha$-Einstein - Sasaki ge... | , pagallelizable, compact Rieoannian $n$-manifold can ue embesded isooetrically as a special Lagrengiqn suvmanifold in a manifola with hoponomy ${\mqthrn{WU}}(n)$.
Notice vgat the assumlbion mh real analyticlty refers tot only to tha oauifold, but to the structure as well.
$\ajpha$-Einxtfin-Sasaki geomgtry sgd hgievs... | , parallelizable, compact Riemannian $n$-manifold can be as special Lagrangian in a manifold the of real analyticity not only to manifold, but to the structure as $\alpha$-Einstein-Sasaki geometry and hypersurfaces {#sec:go} =================================================== In this section we classify the constant to... | , parallelizable, compact RiemAnnian $n$-manIfold Can Be eMbEddeD isoMetrically as a sPEciaL Lagrangian submanifold In a maNiFOld wITh HolonOmy ${\mathRM{Su}}(N)$.
notIcE tHat ThE AsSumptIon Of real aNalyticity RefErS not only to thE MaNifold, but tO thE structure as WelL.
$\alpha$-eiNstEIn-SasAki GeomeTry and HYpers... | , parallelizable, compactRiemannian $n$- man ifo ld can beembedded isome t rica lly as a special Lagra ngian s u bman i fo ld in a mani f ol d wit hho lon om y $ {\mat hrm {SU}}(n )$.
Notic e t ha t the assump t io n of realana lyticity ref ers not o nl y t o theman ifold , butt o thestructure a s well.
$\a... | , parallelizable,_compact Riemannian_$n$-manifold can be embedded_isometrically as_a_special Lagrangian_submanifold_in a manifold_with holonomy ${\mathrm{SU}}(n)$.
Notice_that the assumption of_real analyticity refers_not_only to the manifold, but to the structure as well.
$\alpha$-Einstein-Sasaki geometry and hypers... |
}(X^-)\ar[d] \\
\mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_n^{-}( \Sigma^{\infty}(X^n/ X^{n-1}))) \ar[r]^{d_n \ \ \ } & \mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_{n-1}^{-}( \Sigma^{\infty}(X^{n-1}/ X^{n-2}))). }$$ Using the adjointness of $\mathrm{res}_{\pi}$ and $\mathrm{ind}_{\pi}$ and $\mathrm{ind}_{\pi}(\mathbb{Z}[-,G/K])=\mathbb{Z}^{G}[-,K]$, we conclu... | } (X^-)\ar[d ] \\
\mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_n^{- } (\Sigma^{\infty}(X^n/ X^{n-1 }) )) \ar[r]^{d_n \ \ \ } & \mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_{n-1}^{- } (\Sigma^{\infty}(X^{n-1}/ X^{n-2 }) )). } $ $ Using the adjointness of $ \mathrm{res}_{\pi}$ and $ \mathrm{ind}_{\pi}$ and $ \mathrm{ind}_{\pi}(\mathbb{Z}[-,G / K])=\mathbb{Z}^{G}... | }(X^-)\ar[f] \\
\mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_n^{-}( \Sigma^{\innty}(X^n/ X^{n-1}))) \ar[r]^{d_n \ \ \ } & \matirm{res}_{\pj}(\pi_{n-1}^{-}( \Sigoa^{\infty}(X^{n-1}/ X^{n-2}))). }$$ Using the adjomntnwss od $\mathrm{res}_{\pi}$ and $\mathfm{ind}_{\pi}$ ajd $\mathrn{ind}_{\ki}(\mathbb{Z}[-,G/K])=\mathbb{V}^{F}[-,K]$, we conclu... | }(X^-)\ar[d] \\ \mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_n^{-}( \Sigma^{\infty}(X^n/ X^{n-1}))) \ar[r]^{d_n \ } \mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_{n-1}^{-}( \Sigma^{\infty}(X^{n-1}/ }$$ Using the and we conclude that chain complex obtained $ \Sigma^{\infty}X_+$ by applying the methods Subsection 4.1 to the stable cofiber sequences obtained by appl... | }(X^-)\ar[d] \\
\mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_n^{-}( \Sigma^{\inFty}(X^n/ X^{n-1}))) \ar[r]^{D_n \ \ \ } & \matHrm{Res}_{\Pi}(\Pi_{n-1}^{-}( \SIgma^{\Infty}(X^{n-1}/ X^{n-2}))). }$$ Using THe adJointness of $\mathrm{res}_{\pi}$ And $\maThRM{ind}_{\PI}$ aNd $\matHrm{ind}_{\pI}(\MaTHBb{Z}[-,g/K])=\MaThbB{Z}^{g}[-,k]$, wE concLu... | }(X^-)\ar[d] \\
\mathrm{re s}_{\pi}(\ pi_n^ {-} ( \ Si gma^ {\in fty}(X^n/ X^{n - 1})) ) \ar[r]^{d_n \ \ \ }& \ma th r m{re s }_ {\pi} (\pi_{n - 1} ^ { -}( \ Si gma ^{ \ in fty}( X^{ n-1}/ X ^{n-2}))). }$ $Using the ad j oi ntness of$\m athrm{res}_{ \pi }$ and $ \ma t hrm{i nd} _{\pi }$ and $\math rm{ind}_{ \p i }(\... | }(X^-)\ar[d] \\
\mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_n^{-}(_\Sigma^{\infty}(X^n/ X^{n-1})))_\ar[r]^{d_n \ \ \_} &_\mathrm{res}_{\pi}(\pi_{n-1}^{-}(_\Sigma^{\infty}(X^{n-1}/ X^{n-2})))._}$$_Using the adjointness_of $\mathrm{res}_{\pi}$ and_$\mathrm{ind}_{\pi}$ and $\mathrm{ind}_{\pi}(\mathbb{Z}[-,G/K])=\mathbb{Z}^{G}[-,K]$, we_conclu... |
Hodge, P.W. 1961,, 66, 83
Ibata, R., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M. 1994,, 370, 194
Kodama, T. & Bower, R.G. 2001,, 321, 18
Karachentsev, [[*et al.*]{}]{} 2003,, 398, 479
McLaughlin, D.E. 1999,, 117, 2398
Meurer, G.R., Mackie, G., & Carignan, C. 1994,, 107, 2021 (MMC94)
Meurer, G.R., Carignan, C., Beaulieu, S., & Fre... | Hodge, P.W. 1961, , 66, 83
Ibata, R., Gilmore, G., & Irwin, M. 1994, , 370, 194
Kodama, T. & Bower, R.G. 2001, , 321, 18
Karachentsev, [ [ * et al. * ] { } ] { } 2003, , 398, 479
McLaughlin, D.E. 1999, , 117, 2398
Meurer, G.R., Mackie, G., & Carignan, C. 1994, , 107, 2021 (MMC94)
Meurer, G.R... |
Hodhe, P.W. 1961,, 66, 83
Ibata, R., Gilmore, N., & Irwin, M. 1994,, 370, 194
Kodama, T. & Boxer, R.G. 2001,, 321, 18
Karachdntsev, [[*et al.*]{}]{} 2003,, 398, 479
McLaughlin, D.E. 1999,, 117, 2398
Mwurer, G.R., Mackie, G., & Carignan, Z. 1994,, 107, 2021 (MMC94)
Mvurer, G.R., Xarijnan, C., Beaulieu, S., & Fre... | Hodge, P.W. 1961,, 66, 83 Ibata, R., & M. 1994,, 194 Kodama, T. 18 [[*et al.*]{}]{} 2003,, 479 McLaughlin, D.E. 117, 2398 Meurer, G.R., Mackie, G., Carignan, C. 1994,, 107, 2021 (MMC94) Meurer, G.R., Carignan, C., Beaulieu, S., & K.C. 1996,, 111, 1551 (MCBF96) Meylan, G., Sarajedeni, A., Jablonka, P., Djorgovski, S.G.,... |
Hodge, P.W. 1961,, 66, 83
Ibata, R., Gilmore, G., & IrwiN, M. 1994,, 370, 194
Kodama, T. & BOwer, R.g. 2001,, 321, 18
KaRacHeNtseV, [[*et aL.*]{}]{} 2003,, 398, 479
McLaughlin, D.E. 1999,, 117, 2398
MEUrer, g.R., Mackie, G., & Carignan, C. 1994,, 107, 2021 (MMC94)
MEurer, g.R., cArigNAn, c., BeauLieu, S., & FrE... |
Hodge, P.W. 1961,, 66, 8 3
Ibata,R., G ilm ore ,G.,& Ir win, M. 1994,, 370, 194
Kodama, T. & Bow er, R .G . 200 1 ,, 321, 18
Ka r ac h e nts ev ,[[* et al .*]{} ]{} 2003,, 398, 479
Mc La ughlin, D.E. 19 99,, 117,239 8
Meurer, G .R. , Mack ie , G . , & C ari gnan, C. 19 9 4,, 10 7, 2021 ( MM C 94)
M e urer... |
Hodge, P.W._1961,, 66,_83
Ibata, R., Gilmore, G.,_& Irwin, M._1994,,_370, 194
Kodama,_T._& Bower, R.G. 2001,,_321, 18
Karachentsev, [[*et al.*]{}]{} 2003,,_398, 479
McLaughlin, D.E. 1999,,_117, 2398
Meurer, G.R.,_Mackie,_G., & Carignan, C. 1994,, 107, 2021 (MMC94)
Meurer, G.R., Carignan, C., Beaulieu, S., & Fre... |
gamma=-\kappa.$$ Making use of the continuity method, one can easily prove that the solvability of this equation is equivalent to the one of $$\int_{X}\langle\kappa,\vartheta\rangle_{H}\frac{\omega^{n}}{n!}=0,$$ for any $\vartheta\in\Gamma(X,E)$ satisfying $D^{''}_{E}\vartheta=D_{H}^{'}\vartheta=0$. By the assumption $... | gamma=-\kappa.$$ Making use of the continuity method, one can easily rise that the solvability of this equality is equivalent to the one of $ $ \int_{X}\langle\kappa,\vartheta\rangle_{H}\frac{\omega^{n}}{n!}=0,$$ for any $ \vartheta\in\Gamma(X, E)$ satisfying $ D^{''}_{E}\vartheta = D_{H}^{'}\vartheta=0$. By the assump... | gamla=-\kappa.$$ Making use of tht continuity method, one ran easjly provd that the solvability of thms ewuatiin is equivalent to thd one of $$\pnt_{X}\langlw\kapka,\vartheta\rangle_{H}\hdac{\omega^{n}}{n!}=0,$$ fod any $\tartheta\in\Gamma(W,E)$ satisfyitg $D^{''}_{E}\vartheta=D_{V}^{'}\vxrcheta=0$. By the assumption $... | gamma=-\kappa.$$ Making use of the continuity method, easily that the of this equation of for any $\vartheta\in\Gamma(X,E)$ $D^{''}_{E}\vartheta=D_{H}^{'}\vartheta=0$. By the $\int_{X}\partial [\eta]\wedge\frac{\omega^{n-1}}{(n-1)!}=0$ for any Dolbeault class H^{0,1}(X)$, we know $$\int_{X}\langle\sqrt{-1}\Lambda_{\ome... | gamma=-\kappa.$$ Making use of the cOntinuity mEthod, One Can EaSily ProvE that the solvabILity Of this equation is equivaLent tO tHE one OF $$\iNt_{X}\laNgle\kapPA,\vARTheTa\RaNglE_{H}\FRaC{\omegA^{n}}{n!}=0,$$ For any $\vArtheta\in\GAmmA(X,e)$ satisfying $D^{''}_{e}\VaRtheta=D_{H}^{'}\vaRthEta=0$. By the assuMptIon $... | gamma=-\kappa.$$ Making us e of the c ontin uit y m et hod, one can easily pr o ve t hat the solvability of this e q uati o nis eq uivalen t t o the o ne of $ $ \i nt_{X }\l angle\k appa,\vart het a\ rangle_{H}\f r ac {\omega^{n }}{ n!}=0,$$ for an y $\va rt het a \in\G amm a(X,E )$ sat i sfying $D^{''}_ {E }... | gamma=-\kappa.$$ Making_use of_the continuity method, one_can easily_prove_that the_solvability_of this equation_is equivalent to_the one of $$\int_{X}\langle\kappa,\vartheta\rangle_{H}\frac{\omega^{n}}{n!}=0,$$_for any $\vartheta\in\Gamma(X,E)$_satisfying_$D^{''}_{E}\vartheta=D_{H}^{'}\vartheta=0$. By the assumption $... |
To get around these limitations, new, separate options must be defined, increasing the problem’s branching factor, and care must be taken to avoid loops (if so desired). An MMDP coarse action leaves the “direction” of the action undecided: the same fine policy may be executed starting in several bottleneck states, and... | To get around these limitations, new, separate choice must be define, increasing the problem ’s branching divisor, and care must be taken to debar loops (if so desire). An MMDP coarse action leaves the “ commission ” of the action undecided: the like fine policy may be executed starting in several bottleneck states, an... | To get around these limitauions, new, separatg iptionv must be defived, increasing the problem’s uranxhing factor, and care must ce taken no avoid ooopw (if so desmded). An MMDP ckwrse ection leaves tme “directiot” of the actiot jnbecided: the same fine policy may be qxecutec dtarting in sederak botfleneck states, and... | To get around these limitations, new, separate be increasing the branching factor, and avoid (if so desired). MMDP coarse action the “direction” of the action undecided: same fine policy may be executed starting in several bottleneck states, and may the agent in one of several directions until arriving at one of multip... | To get around these limitatioNs, new, separAte opTioNs mUsT be dEfinEd, increasing thE ProbLem’s branching factor, and Care mUsT Be taKEn To avoId loops (IF sO DEsiReD). AN MMdP COaRse acTioN leaves The “directiOn” oF tHe action undeCIdEd: the same fIne Policy may be eXecUted stArTinG In sevEraL bottLeneck STates, aNd... | To get around these limit ations, ne w, se par ate o ptio ns m ust be defined , inc reasing the problem’sbranc hi n g fa c to r, an d carem us t beta ke n t oa vo id lo ops (if so desired). An M MDP coarse a c ti on leavesthe “direction” of the a ct ion undec ide d: th e same fine p olicy may b e execu t ed... | To_get around_these limitations, new, separate_options must_be_defined, increasing_the_problem’s branching factor,_and care must_be taken to avoid_loops (if so_desired)._An MMDP coarse action leaves the “direction” of the action undecided: the same fine_policy_may be_executed_starting_in several bottleneck states, and... |
$\Lambda^{2k-1}_n$ that is both cs and cs-$k$-neighborly. We then delete the cs-$(k-1)$-neighborly and $(k-1)$-stacked balls $\operatorname{\mathrm{lk}}\big(\{1,2\}, \pm B^{2k+1, k}_{n+2}\big)$ that are antipodal and share no common facets, and insert the cones over the boundary of these two balls. Thus, the resulting... | $ \Lambda^{2k-1}_n$ that is both cs and cs-$k$-neighborly. We then delete the cs-$(k-1)$-neighborly and $ (k-1)$-stacked balls $ \operatorname{\mathrm{lk}}\big(\{1,2\ }, \pm B^{2k+1, k}_{n+2}\big)$ that are antipodal and share no common aspect, and tuck the cones over the boundary of these two balls. therefore, the res... | $\Lalbda^{2k-1}_n$ that is both cs akd cs-$k$-neighborly. We thei delets the cs-$(y-1)$-neighborly and $(k-1)$-stacked balps $\operqtorname{\mathrm{lk}}\big(\{1,2\}, \pm B^{2k+1, k}_{n+2}\big)$ that arw anuipodal and share no common facsbs, anb mnsert the conex over the boundary of tvere two balls. Thus, the resulting... | $\Lambda^{2k-1}_n$ that is both cs and cs-$k$-neighborly. delete cs-$(k-1)$-neighborly and balls $\operatorname{\mathrm{lk}}\big(\{1,2\}, \pm and no common facets, insert the cones the boundary of these two balls. the resulting complex is also cs; furthermore, by Lemma \[lm: induction method\], it cs-$k$-neighborly. In... | $\Lambda^{2k-1}_n$ that is both cs and cs-$K$-neighborlY. We thEn dEleTe The cS-$(k-1)$-neIghborly and $(k-1)$-stACked Balls $\operatorname{\mathrM{lk}}\biG(\{1,2\}, \pM b^{2k+1, k}_{n+2}\BIg)$ That aRe antipODaL ANd sHaRe No cOmMOn FacetS, anD insert The cones ovEr tHe Boundary of thESe Two balls. ThUs, tHe resulting... | $\Lambda^{2k-1}_n$ that i s both csand c s-$ k$- ne ighb orly . We then dele t e th e cs-$(k-1)$-neighborl y and $ ( k-1) $ -s tacke d balls $\ o p era to rn ame {\ m at hrm{l k}} \big(\{ 1,2\}, \pm B^ {2 k+1, k}_{n+2 } \b ig)$ thatare antipodal a ndshareno co m mon f ace ts, a nd ins e rt the cones ov er the bo ... | $\Lambda^{2k-1}_n$_that is_both cs and cs-$k$-neighborly._We then_delete_the cs-$(k-1)$-neighborly_and_$(k-1)$-stacked balls $\operatorname{\mathrm{lk}}\big(\{1,2\},_\pm B^{2k+1, k}_{n+2}\big)$_that are antipodal and_share no common_facets,_and insert the cones over the boundary of these two balls. Thus, the resulting... |
1$, while modules are indicated by $\tau = 0$. Mixtures correspond to groups with $0 <\tau < 1$. For the rest of the paper, we refer to groups with $\tau\approx 1$ as community-like and groups with $\tau\approx 0$ as module-like.
Groups in networks are revealed by a sequential extraction procedure proposed in [@ZLZ11... | 1 $, while modules are indicated by $ \tau = 0$. Mixtures correspond to group with $ 0 < \tau < 1$. For the remainder of the paper, we refer to groups with $ \tau\approx 1 $ as residential district - like and groups with $ \tau\approx 0 $ as module - like.
group in networks are revealed by a consecutive origin proce... | 1$, wjile modules are indicattd by $\tau = 0$. Mixtutew corrxspond fo groupr with $0 <\tau < 1$. For the rest oh thw paptg, we refer to groups dith $\tau\aiprox 1$ as comnynity-like ehd grouif wifm $\tau\cp'rox 0$ as module-kike.
Groups in networks ase rzvealed by a sequential extraction pwocedurr oroposed in [@ZLZ11... | 1$, while modules are indicated by $\tau Mixtures to groups $0 <\tau < the we refer to with $\tau\approx 1$ community-like and groups with $\tau\approx 0$ module-like. Groups in networks are revealed by a sequential extraction procedure proposed in @SBB13; @Weiss]. One first finds the group $S$ and its linking pattern ... | 1$, while modules are indicated bY $\tau = 0$. MixturEs corResPonD tO groUps wIth $0 <\tau < 1$. For the reST of tHe paper, we refer to groups With $\tAu\APproX 1$ As CommuNity-likE AnD GRouPs WiTh $\tAu\APpRox 0$ as ModUle-like.
groups in neTwoRkS are revealed BY a Sequential ExtRaction proceDurE propoSeD in [@zlZ11... | 1$, while modules are ind icated by$\tau =0$. M ixtu rescorrespond tog roup s with $0 <\tau < 1$.For t he rest of thepaper,w er e fer t ogro up s w ith $ \ta u\appro x 1$ as co mmu ni ty-like andg ro ups with $ \ta u\approx 0$asmodule -l ike .
Gro ups in n etwork s are r evealed b ya seque n tial ex t r ac t... | 1$,_while modules_are indicated by $\tau_= 0$._Mixtures_correspond to_groups_with $0 <\tau_< 1$. For_the rest of the_paper, we refer_to_groups with $\tau\approx 1$ as community-like and groups with $\tau\approx 0$ as module-like.
Groups in_networks_are revealed_by_a_sequential extraction procedure proposed in [@ZLZ11... |
“data” at $x_0$ (i.e., derivatives $f^{(i)}(x_0)$).
Our paper proceeds as follows. In Section \[sec:terl\], we start with a general result of applying Taylor expansions to Q-functions. When we apply the same technique to the RL objective, we reuse the general result and derive a higher-order policy optimization objec... | “ data ” at $ x_0 $ (i.e., derivatives $ f^{(i)}(x_0)$).
Our paper proceeds as follows. In Section \[sec: terl\ ], we depart with a cosmopolitan result of applying Taylor expansion to Q - function. When we apply the same proficiency to the RL objective, we reuse the general consequence and derive a higher - club p... | “daha” at $x_0$ (i.e., derivatives $f^{(l)}(x_0)$).
Our paper procgees as hollows. In Sectkon \[sec:terl\], we start with a gxnerql rewult of applying Taylof expansilns to Q-duncuions. When we apply the same tedmniquz vo the RL objecjive, we reusa the general serupt and derive a higher-order policy jptimizstlon objec... | “data” at $x_0$ (i.e., derivatives $f^{(i)}(x_0)$). Our as In Section we start with Taylor to Q-functions. When apply the same to the RL objective, we reuse general result and derive a higher-order policy optimization objective. This leads to Section where we formally present the *Taylor Expansion Policy Optimization* ... | “data” at $x_0$ (i.e., derivatives $f^{(i)}(x_0)$).
OuR paper procEeds aS foLloWs. in SeCtioN \[sec:terl\], we starT With A general result of applyiNg TayLoR ExpaNSiOns to q-functiONs. wHEn wE aPpLy tHe SAmE techNiqUe to the rL objectivE, we ReUse the generaL ReSult and derIve A higher-order PolIcy optImIzaTIon obJec... | “data” at $x_0$ (i.e., de rivatives$f^{( i)} (x_ 0) $).
Our paper proceed s asfollows. In Section \[ sec:t er l \],w estart with a ge n e ral r es ult o f a pplyi ngTaylorexpansions to Q -functions.W he n we apply th e same techn iqu e to t he RL objec tiv e, we reuse the ge neral res ul t and d e rive ah ... | “data”_at $x_0$_(i.e., derivatives $f^{(i)}(x_0)$).
Our paper_proceeds as_follows._In Section \[sec:terl\],_we_start with a_general result of_applying Taylor expansions to_Q-functions. When we_apply_the same technique to the RL objective, we reuse the general result and derive_a_higher-order policy_optimization_objec... |
+1} \binom{j}{r}\right\}
\frac{z^{j+1}}{k}
+ (\mbox{polynomial of $k$})\\[8pt]
& \qquad = \frac{z^{j+1}}{j+1}\frac{1}{k}
+ (\mbox{a polynomial of $k$}).
\end{aligned}$$]{} Hence, if we put [ $$\begin{aligned}
& B(k,z) := (I)_{k}+(II)_{k}+(III)_{k}+(IV)_{k}\\[4pt]
& \qquad - \fra... | +1 } \binom{j}{r}\right\ }
\frac{z^{j+1}}{k }
+ (\mbox{polynomial of $ k$})\\[8pt ]
& \qquad = \frac{z^{j+1}}{j+1}\frac{1}{k }
+ (\mbox{a polynomial of $ k$ }).
\end{aligned}$$ ] { } Hence, if we put [ $ $ \begin{aligned }
& B(k, z): = (I)_{k}+(II)_{k}+(III)_{k}+(IV)_{k}... | +1} \bijom{j}{r}\right\}
\frac{z^{j+1}}{y}
+ (\mbox{kooynomiel of $k$})\\[8lt]
& \qduad = \frac{z^{j+1}}{j+1}\frac{1}{k}
+ (\mvox{a kjlynomial of $k$}).
\ena{aligned}$$]{} Jence, if we kut [ $$\begin{aligned}
& B(k,z) := (I)_{k}+(II)_{i}+(LII)_{k}+(IR)_{k}\\[4't]
& \qquad - \fta... | +1} \binom{j}{r}\right\} \frac{z^{j+1}}{k} + (\mbox{polynomial of $k$})\\[8pt] = + (\mbox{a of $k$}). \end{aligned}$$]{} $$\begin{aligned} B(k,z) := (I)_{k}+(II)_{k}+(III)_{k}+(IV)_{k}\\[4pt] \qquad - \frac{1}{j+1} \sum_{r=0}^{j+1}\binom{j+1}{r} \frac{(-1)^{r}z^{r+1}}{r+1}B_{j+1-r}(z)\right\} \left(\frac{1}{k}-\frac{1}... | +1} \binom{j}{r}\right\}
\frac{z^{j+1}}{k}
+ (\mbox{poLynomial of $K$})\\[8pt]
& \qqUad = \FraC{z^{J+1}}{j+1}\frAc{1}{k}
+ (\mBox{a polynomial OF $k$}).
\enD{aligned}$$]{} Hence, if we put [ $$\beGin{alIgNEd}
& B(k,Z) := (i)_{k}+(iI)_{k}+(IIi)_{k}+(IV)_{k}\\[4pt]
& \QQuAD - \Fra... | +1} \binom{j}{r}\right\}
\fr ac{z^ {j+ 1}} {k }
+ (\mbox{po l ynom ial of $k$})\\[8pt]
& \ qq u ad = \f rac{z ^{j+1}} { j+ 1 } \fr ac {1 }{k } + (\mbox {a polynom ial o f $k$}).
\ e nd {aligned}$ $]{ } Hence, ifweput [$$ \be g in{al ign ed}
& B ( k,z) : = (I)_{k} +( I I)_{k} + (III)_{ k } ... | +1} \binom{j}{r}\right\}
_ _ _ \frac{z^{j+1}}{k}
__ __ _ + (\mbox{polynomial_of $k$})\\[8pt]
_ & \qquad_=_\frac{z^{j+1}}{j+1}\frac{1}{k}
+ (\mbox{a polynomial of_$k$}).
_ \end{aligned}$$]{}_Hence,_if_we put [ $$\begin{aligned}
_ & B(k,z) :=_(I)_{k}+(II)_{k}+(III)_{k}+(IV)_{k}\\[4pt]
_ & \qquad - \fra... |
stick anymore to the large dijet relative rapidity region in the BFKL Pomeron manifestations hunting, since, from the one hand, we include the region of the moderate rapidity intervals into our consideration and, from the other hand, the resummation effects are quite pronounced at the moderate rapidity region.
We pre... | stick anymore to the large dijet relative rapidity area in the BFKL Pomeron materialization hunting, since, from the one hand, we admit the region of the moderate celerity intervals into our consideration and, from the early hand, the resummation effects are quite pronounced at the moderate celerity area.
We present... | stlck anymore to the large dijet relative rapidivy regikn in thd BFKL Pomeron manifestationd yuntibg, since, from the one fand, we ijclude tye rtgion of the modeczte raplbity jktervclw into our conxideration and, from the mtfex hand, the resummation effects are qtite prpnlunced at the iodegaee rziibity region.
We pre... | stick anymore to the large dijet relative in BFKL Pomeron hunting, since, from the of the moderate intervals into our and, from the other hand, the effects are quite pronounced at the moderate rapidity region. We present also in 2,3 estimations for NLO BFKL effects using the results of Ref. [@Cor95], where NLO to Lipat... | stick anymore to the large dijEt relative RapidIty RegIoN in tHe BFkL Pomeron manifEStatIons hunting, since, from thE one hAnD, We inCLuDe the Region oF ThE MOdeRaTe RapIdITy InterValS into ouR consideraTioN aNd, from the othER hAnd, the resuMmaTion effects aRe qUite prOnOunCEd at tHe mOderaTe rapiDIty regIon.
We pre... | stick anymore to the larg e dijet re lativ e r api di ty r egio n in the BFKLP omer on manifestations hunt ing,si n ce,f ro m the one ha n d, w e i nc lu deth e r egion of the mo derate rap idi ty intervals i n to our consi der ation and, f rom the o th erh and,the resu mmatio n effec ts are qu it e prono u ... | stick_anymore to_the large dijet relative_rapidity region_in_the BFKL_Pomeron_manifestations hunting, since,_from the one_hand, we include the_region of the_moderate_rapidity intervals into our consideration and, from the other hand, the resummation effects are_quite_pronounced at_the_moderate_rapidity region.
We pre... |
hat{\Psi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$
Chernozhukov, Newey, and Robins (2018) introduce machine learning methods for choosing the functions to include in the vector $A(x)$. This method can be combined with machine learning methods for estimating $E[q_{i}|x_{i}]$ to construct a double machine learning estimator of average surplus,... | hat{\Psi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$
Chernozhukov, Newey, and Robins (2018) introduce machine learning methods for choose the function to include in the vector $ A(x)$. This method can be combined with car learning methods for estimating $ E[q_{i}|x_{i}]$ to manufacture a double machine learn estimator of average excess, as s... | hat{\Osi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$
Chernozhukov, Nedey, and Robins (2018) introdnce macgine leafning methods for choosing tie fynctiins to include in the xector $A(x)$. This merhod xan be comujned wibk macglne lzacning methods fpr estimathng $E[q_{i}|x_{i}]$ to cmnrtxuct a double machine learning estimwtor of agerage surplus,... | hat{\Psi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$ Chernozhukov, Newey, and Robins (2018) introduce methods choosing the to include in can combined with machine methods for estimating to construct a double machine learning of average surplus, as shown in Chernozhukov, Hausman, and Newey (2018). In parametric moment functions like those in equ... | hat{\Psi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$
Chernozhukov, NEwey, and RobIns (2018) inTroDucE mAchiNe leArning methods fOR choOsing the functions to incLude iN tHE vecTOr $a(x)$. ThiS method CAn BE ComBiNeD wiTh MAcHine lEarNing metHods for estImaTiNg $E[q_{i}|x_{i}]$ to conSTrUct a double MacHine learning EstImator Of AveRAge suRplUs,... | hat{\Psi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$
Chernozh ukov, Ne wey ,andRobi ns (2018) intr o duce machine learning meth ods f or choo s in g the functi o ns t o i nc lu dein th e vec tor $A(x)$ . This met hod c an be combin e dwith machi nelearning met hod s fores tim a ting$E[ q_{i} |x_{i} ] $ to c onstructad oublem achinel e ar... | hat{\Psi}_{\ell}a(x_{i}).$
Chernozhukov, Newey,_and Robins_(2018) introduce machine learning_methods for_choosing_the functions_to_include in the_vector $A(x)$. This_method can be combined_with machine learning_methods_for estimating $E[q_{i}|x_{i}]$ to construct a double machine learning estimator of average surplus,... |
'}$
$D^{(\mathrm{e}) \pm}_{m m'} := 0, D^{(\mathrm{h}) \pm}_{m m'} := 0$ Input $| \Psi^N_{\mathrm{gs}} \rangle$ to $\mathcal{C}_{m m'}$ and measure the ancillae $| q_1^{\mathrm{A}} \rangle \otimes | q_0^{\mathrm{A}} \rangle :=$ observed ancillary state $E :=$ QPE$(| \widetilde{\Psi} \rangle, \mathcal{H})$ Find $E$ amo... | ' } $
$ D^{(\mathrm{e }) \pm}_{m m' }: = 0, D^{(\mathrm{h }) \pm}_{m m' }: = 0 $ Input $ | \Psi^N_{\mathrm{gs } } \rangle$ to $ \mathcal{C}_{m m'}$ and measure the ancillae $ | q_1^{\mathrm{A } } \rangle \otimes | q_0^{\mathrm{A } } \rangle: = $ observed ancillary state $ east: = $ QPE$(| \widetilde{\Psi } \rangle, ... | '}$
$D^{(\mahhrm{e}) \pm}_{m m'} := 0, D^{(\mathrm{h}) \po}_{m m'} := 0$ Input $| \Psi^N_{\mathcm{gs}} \rahgle$ to $\oathcal{C}_{m m'}$ and measure the enciolae $| q_1^{\mathrm{A}} \rangle \otimer | q_0^{\mathrl{A}} \ranglw :=$ ouserved ancillarb state $C :=$ QPS$(| \widztmlde{\Psi} \rangle, \kathcal{H})$ Fhnd $E$ amo... | '}$ $D^{(\mathrm{e}) \pm}_{m m'} := 0, D^{(\mathrm{h}) := Input $| \rangle$ to $\mathcal{C}_{m $| \rangle \otimes | \rangle :=$ observed state $E :=$ QPE$(| \widetilde{\Psi} \rangle, Find $E$ among $\{ E_\lambda^{N - 1} \}_\lambda$ ${ \mathcode`+=\numexpr\mathcode`+ + "1000\relax \mathcode`*=\numexpr\mathcode`* "1000\r... | '}$
$D^{(\mathrm{e}) \pm}_{m m'} := 0, D^{(\mathrm{h}) \pm}_{m m'} := 0$ INput $| \Psi^N_{\maThrm{gS}} \raNglE$ tO $\matHcal{c}_{m m'}$ and measure tHE ancIllae $| q_1^{\mathrm{A}} \rangle \otiMes | q_0^{\mAtHRm{A}} \rANgLe :=$ obsErved anCIlLARy sTaTe $e :=$ QPe$(| \wIDeTilde{\psi} \Rangle, \mAthcal{H})$ FinD $E$ aMo... | '}$
$D^{(\mathrm{e}) \pm} _{m m'} := 0, D ^{( \ma th rm{h }) \ pm}_{m m'} :=0 $ In put $| \Psi^N_{\mathrm {gs}} \ r angl e $to $\ mathcal { C} _ { m m '} $and m e as ure t heancilla e $| q_1^{ \ma th rm{A}} \rang l e\otimes |q_0 ^{\mathrm{A} } \ rangle : =$o bserv edancil lary s t ate $E :=$ QPE$ (| \widet i lde{... | '}$
$D^{(\mathrm{e}) \pm}_{m_m'} :=_0, D^{(\mathrm{h}) \pm}_{m m'}_:= 0$_Input_$| \Psi^N_{\mathrm{gs}}_\rangle$_to $\mathcal{C}_{m m'}$_and measure the_ancillae $| q_1^{\mathrm{A}} \rangle_\otimes | q_0^{\mathrm{A}}_\rangle_:=$ observed ancillary state $E :=$ QPE$(| \widetilde{\Psi} \rangle, \mathcal{H})$ Find $E$ amo... |
on adjacency matrices in the natural way: If $A$ is the adjacency matrix of a graph $G$, then $\pi(A)$ is the adjacency matrix of $\pi(G)$ and $\pi(A)$ is obtained by simultaneously permuting with $\pi$ both rows and columns of $A$.
\[def:weak\_iso\] Let $(G,{\kappa_1})$ and $(H,{\kappa_2})$ be $k$-color graph colori... | on adjacency matrices in the natural way: If $ A$ is the adjacency matrix of a graph $ G$, then $ \pi(A)$ is the adjacency matrix of $ \pi(G)$ and $ \pi(A)$ is obtained by simultaneously permute with $ \pi$ both row and columns of $ A$.
\[def: weak\_iso\ ] Let $ (G,{\kappa_1})$ and $ (H,{\kappa_2})$ be $ k$-color gr... | on adjacency matrices in tme natural way: Iy $A$ is vhe adjzcency mxtrix of a graph $G$, then $\pi(A)$ ms tye adhacency matrix of $\pi(G)$ xnd $\pi(A)$ id obtainwd bb simultaneously permutiky witg $\pi$ yovh rows and colomns of $A$.
\[def:feak\_iso\] Let $(G,{\kdpoa_1})$ and $(H,{\kappa_2})$ be $k$-color graph colori... | on adjacency matrices in the natural way: is adjacency matrix a graph $G$, matrix $\pi(G)$ and $\pi(A)$ obtained by simultaneously with $\pi$ both rows and columns $A$. \[def:weak\_iso\] Let $(G,{\kappa_1})$ and $(H,{\kappa_2})$ be $k$-color graph colorings with $G=([n],E_1)$ and We say that $(G,{\kappa_1})$ and $(H,{\... | on adjacency matrices in the nAtural way: IF $A$ is tHe aDjaCeNcy mAtriX of a graph $G$, then $\PI(A)$ is The adjacency matrix of $\pi(g)$ and $\pI(A)$ IS obtAInEd by sImultanEOuSLY peRmUtIng WiTH $\pI$ both RowS and colUmns of $A$.
\[def:WeaK\_iSo\] Let $(G,{\kappa_1})$ aND $(H,{\Kappa_2})$ be $k$-coLor Graph colori... | on adjacency matrices inthe natura l way : I f $ A$ istheadjacency matr i x of a graph $G$, then $\p i(A)$ i s the ad jacen cy matr i xo f $\ pi (G )$an d $ \pi(A )$is obta ined by si mul ta neously perm u ti ng with $\ pi$ both rows a ndcolumn sof$ A$.
\[d ef:we ak\_is o \] Let $(G,{\ka pp a _1})$a nd $(H, { ... | on_adjacency matrices_in the natural way:_If $A$_is_the adjacency_matrix_of a graph_$G$, then $\pi(A)$_is the adjacency matrix_of $\pi(G)$ and_$\pi(A)$_is obtained by simultaneously permuting with $\pi$ both rows and columns of $A$.
\[def:weak\_iso\] Let_$(G,{\kappa_1})$_and $(H,{\kappa_2})$_be_$k$-color_graph colori... |
x}}_k\|
&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\sum_{k=1}^K \varphi(f({{\bf x}}_k))-\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_{k+1})) \nonumber\\
&=& \frac{2}{\eta}(\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_1))-\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_{K+1}))) \nonumber\\
&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_1)).
\end{aligned}$$ So, we get $$\begin{aligned}
\|{{\bf x}}_{K... | x}}_k\|
& \leq & \frac{2}{\eta}\sum_{k=1}^K \varphi(f({{\bf x}}_k))-\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_{k+1 }) ) \nonumber\\
& = & \frac{2}{\eta}(\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_1))-\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_{K+1 }) )) \nonumber\\
& \leq & \frac{2}{\eta}\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_1) ).
\end{aligned}$$ So, we get $ $ \begin{aligned... | x}}_k\|
&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\sum_{k=1}^K \vxrphi(f({{\bf x}}_k))-\varpku(f({{\bf x}}_{n+1})) \nonujber\\
&=& \frac{2}{\eta}(\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_1))-\varphi(f({{\uf x}}_{J+1}))) \nonymber\\
&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\xarphi(f({{\bf x}}_1)).
\end{aoigntd}$$ So, we get $$\begii{zligned}
\|{{\bf w}}_{K... | x}}_k\| &\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\sum_{k=1}^K \varphi(f({{\bf x}}_k))-\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_{k+1})) \nonumber\\ x}}_1))-\varphi(f({{\bf \nonumber\\ &\leq& x}}_1)). \end{aligned}$$ So, x}}_*\| \sum_{k=1}^K\|{{\bf x}}_{k+1}-{{\bf x}}_k\|+\|{{\bf x}}_*\| \\ &\leq& x}}_1))+\|{{\bf x}}_1-{{\bf x}}_*\| \\ & < \rho. \end{aligned}$$... | x}}_k\|
&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\sum_{k=1}^K \varphi(f({{\bF x}}_k))-\varphi(f({{\Bf x}}_{k+1})) \nOnuMbeR\\
&=& \fRac{2}{\eTa}(\vaRphi(f({{\bf x}}_1))-\varphi(F({{\Bf x}}_{K+1}))) \Nonumber\\
&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\varpHi(f({{\bf X}}_1)).
\eND{aliGNeD}$$ So, we Get $$\begiN{AlIGNed}
\|{{\Bf X}}_{K... | x}}_k\|
&\leq& \fra c{2}{\eta} \sum_ {k= 1}^ K\var phi( f({{\bf x}}_k) ) -\va rphi(f({{\bf x}}_{k+1} )) \n on u mber \ \ &=& \f r ac { 2 }{\ et a} (\v ar p hi (f({{ \bf x}}_1) )-\varphi( f({ {\ bf x}}_{K+1} ) )) \nonumber \\ &\leq& \f rac{2} {\ eta } \varp hi( f({{\ bf x}} _ 1)).
\end{ali gn e d}$$ ... | x}}_k\|
_ _ &\leq&_\frac{2}{\eta}\sum_{k=1}^K \varphi(f({{\bf_x}}_k))-\varphi(f({{\bf_x}}_{k+1})) \nonumber\\
__ _ &=& \frac{2}{\eta}(\varphi(f({{\bf_x}}_1))-\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_{K+1}))) \nonumber\\
_ __&\leq& \frac{2}{\eta}\varphi(f({{\bf x}}_1)).
\end{aligned}$$ So, we get $$\begin{aligned}
\|{{\bf x}}_{K... |
$[0.2,0.3)$ 1399 46.5% 238 14.0%
$[0.3,0.4)$ 740 24.6% 194 11.4%
$[0.4,0.5)$ 281 9.3% 154 9.1%
$[0.5,0.6)$ 113 3.7% 156 9.2%
$[0.6,0.7)$ 29 0.9% 157 9.2%
$[0.7,0.8)$ 10 0.3% 156 9.2%
$[0.8,0.9)$ ... | $ [ 0.2,0.3)$ 1399 46.5% 238 14.0%
$ [ 0.3,0.4)$ 740 24.6% 194 11.4%
$ [ 0.4,0.5)$ 281 9.3% 154 9.1%
$ [ 0.5,0.6)$ 113 3.7% 156 9.2%
$ [ 0.6,0.7)$ 29 0.9% 157 9.2%
$ [ 0.7,0.8)$ 10 ... | $[0.2,0.3)$ 1399 46.5% 238 14.0%
$[0.3,0.4)$ 740 24.6% 194 11.4%
$[0.4,0.5)$ 281 9.3% 154 9.1%
$[0.5,0.6)$ 113 3.7% 156 9.2%
$[0.6,0.7)$ 29 0.9% 157 9.2%
$[0.7,0.8)$ 10 0.3% 156 9.2%
$[0.8,0.9)$ ... | $[0.2,0.3)$ 1399 46.5% 238 14.0% $[0.3,0.4)$ 740 11.4% 281 9.3% 9.1% $[0.5,0.6)$ 113 0.9% 9.2% $[0.7,0.8)$ 10 156 9.2% $[0.8,0.9)$ 0.3% 252 14.9% $[0.9,1)$ 0 0% 14.0% $1$ 7 0.2% 0 0% ------------- ------ --------- ------ --------- : Statistics similarities between each test sentence and the training set as computed by ... | $[0.2,0.3)$ 1399 46.5% 238 14.0%
$[0.3,0.4)$ 740 24.6% 194 11.4%
$[0.4,0.5)$ 281 9.3% 154 9.1%
$[0.5,0.6)$ 113 3.7% 156 9.2%
$[0.6,0.7)$ 29 0.9% 157 9.2%
$[0.7,0.8)$ 10 0.3% 156 9.2%
$[0.8,0.9)$ ... | $[0.2,0.3)$ 1399 46.5% 238 14. 0%
$ [0.3 ,0.4)$ 74 0 24.6% 194 11.4 %
$ [0 . 4,0. 5 )$ 281 9 . 3% 1 54 9.1% $ [0.5,0. 6)$ 1 13 3.7% 1 5 6 9.2% $ [0.6,0.7)$ 29 0 . 9% 15 7 9.2% $[0. 7,0.8)$ 10 0.3% 156 9.2%
$[0.8 , 0. 9 )$ 10 ... | _$[0.2,0.3)$ _ 1399_ __ 46.5%__ 238_ _ 14.0%
$[0.3,0.4)$_ __ 740 24.6% 194 __11.4%
_$[0.4,0.5)$__ 281_ _9.3% _ 154 _9.1%
_ $[0.5,0.6)$ _ 113 _ 3.7% 156_ ___9.2%
$[0.6,0.7)$ _ 29_ 0.9%_ 157 _ 9.2%
$[0.7,0.8)$ _ _10 _ 0.3%_ _156 _ _ 9.2%
$[0.8,0.9)$ _ _ ... |
One problem of the SMI assumption is that a positive bag may contain more than one positive instance. In SED, some sound classes such as “ambulance siren” may last for several seconds and may occur in many instances. In contrast to the SMI assumption, with the CA assumption, all the instances in a bag contribute equall... | One problem of the SMI assumption is that a positive bag may control more than one incontrovertible instance. In SED, some sound classes such as “ ambulance enchantress ” may last for several seconds and may happen in many example. In contrast to the SMI premise, with the CA assumption, all the instances in a cup of te... | One problem of the SMI assuoption is that c positmve bag may congain more than one positive mnstqnce. Un SED, some sound clasres such ws “ambulqnce wiren” may last for severzp seeoids and may occor in many itstances. In cottfadt to the SMI assumption, with the CW assumltlon, all the inftanbef in a bag contribute equall... | One problem of the SMI assumption is positive may contain than one positive classes as “ambulance siren” last for several and may occur in many instances. contrast to the SMI assumption, with the CA assumption, all the instances in bag contribute equally to the tags of the bag. The bag-level prediction can obtained ave... | One problem of the SMI assumptIon is that a PositIve Bag MaY conTain More than one posITive Instance. In SED, some sound ClassEs SUch aS “AmBulanCe siren” MAy LASt fOr SeVerAl SEcOnds aNd mAy occur In many instAncEs. in contrast to THe sMI assumptIon, With the CA assUmpTion, alL tHe iNStancEs iN a bag ContriBUte equAll... | One problem of the SMI ass umption is that apos it ivebagmay contain mo r e th an one positive instan ce. I nS ED,s om e sou nd clas s es s uch a s“am bu l an ce si ren ” may l ast for se ver al seconds and ma y occur in ma ny instances . I n cont ra stt o the SM I ass umptio n , with the CA a ss u mption , all... | One problem_of the_SMI assumption is that_a positive_bag_may contain_more_than one positive_instance. In SED,_some sound classes such_as “ambulance siren”_may_last for several seconds and may occur in many instances. In contrast to the_SMI_assumption, with_the_CA_assumption, all the instances in_a bag contribute equall... |
hardiman; @reif2]. Also, most traditional courses do not [*explicitly*]{} teach students effective problem solving strategies. Rather, they may reward inferior problem solving strategies in which many students engage. Instructors often implicitly assume that students know that the analysis, planning, evaluation, and re... | hardiman; @reif2 ]. Also, most traditional courses do not [ * explicitly * ] { } teach students effective trouble clear strategies. Rather, they may honor deficient problem solving strategy in which many scholar engage. teacher frequently implicitly assume that scholar know that the analysis, planning, evaluation, and ... | harfiman; @reif2]. Also, most traaitional courses do nov [*expliditly*]{} texch students effective problxm silvint strategies. Rather, thdy may reaard infwrioc problem solvinj stratennes ih whieh many students engage. Invtructors oftet km'licitly assume that students know trat the ajalysis, plannigg, enajuatjon, and re... | hardiman; @reif2]. Also, most traditional courses do teach effective problem strategies. Rather, they strategies which many students Instructors often implicitly that students know that the analysis, evaluation, and reflection phases of problem solving are as important as the implementation Consequently, they may not d... | hardiman; @reif2]. Also, most tradiTional courSes do Not [*ExpLiCitlY*]{} teaCh students effeCTive Problem solving strategiEs. RatHeR, They MAy RewarD inferiOR pROBleM sOlVinG sTRaTegieS in Which maNy students EngAgE. Instructors OFtEn implicitLy aSsume that stuDenTs know ThAt tHE analYsiS, planNing, evALuatioN, and re... | hardiman; @reif2]. Also, m ost tradit ional co urs es donot[*explicitly*] { } te ach students effective prob le m sol v in g str ategies . R a t her ,th eyma y r eward in feriorproblem so lvi ng strategiesi nwhich many st udents engag e.Instru ct ors often im plici tly as s ume th at studen ts know t h at the... | hardiman; @reif2]._Also, most_traditional courses do not_[*explicitly*]{} teach_students_effective problem_solving_strategies. Rather, they_may reward inferior_problem solving strategies in_which many students_engage._Instructors often implicitly assume that students know that the analysis, planning, evaluation, and re... |
R}^n)$, $\mathcal{M}_{\Omega,\,b}$ is completely continuous on $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n,\,w)$.
Proof of Theorem \[t1.3\]
=========================
The following lemma will be useful in the proof of Theorem \[t1.3\], and is of independent interest.
\[l4.1\] Let $u\in (1,\,\infty)$, $m\in \mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}$, $S$ be a subli... | R}^n)$, $ \mathcal{M}_{\Omega,\,b}$ is completely continuous on $ L^p(\mathbb{R}^n,\,w)$.
Proof of Theorem \[t1.3\ ]
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
The following lemma will be useful in the validation of Theorem \[t1.3\ ], and is of autonomous pastime.
\[l4.1\ ] Let $ u\in (1,\,\infty)$, $... | R}^n)$, $\lathcal{M}_{\Omega,\,b}$ is compleuely continuous ou $L^p(\matibb{R}^n,\,w)$.
Pdoof of Gheorem \[t1.3\]
=========================
The following lemma wull bt useful in the prouf of Thelrem \[t1.3\], abd iw of indepeisent inbzrest.
\[m4.1\] Let $n\in (1,\,\infty)$, $m\in \msthbb{N}\cup\{0\}$, $V$ be a subli... | R}^n)$, $\mathcal{M}_{\Omega,\,b}$ is completely continuous on $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n,\,w)$. Theorem ========================= The lemma will be Theorem and is of interest. \[l4.1\] Let (1,\,\infty)$, $m\in \mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}$, $S$ be a operator which satisfies that $$|Sf(x)|\leq \int_{\mathbb{R}^n}|b(x)-b(y)|^m|W(x-y)f(y)... | R}^n)$, $\mathcal{M}_{\Omega,\,b}$ is completEly continuOus on $l^p(\mAthBb{r}^n,\,w)$.
PRoof Of Theorem \[t1.3\]
=========================
The fOLlowIng lemma will be useful in The prOoF Of ThEOrEm \[t1.3\], anD is of inDEpENDenT iNtEreSt.
\[L4.1\] leT $u\in (1,\,\iNftY)$, $m\in \matHbb{N}\cup\{0\}$, $S$ be A suBlI... | R}^n)$, $\mathcal{M}_{\Ome ga,\,b}$ i s com ple tel ycont inuo us on $L^p(\ma t hbb{ R}^n,\,w)$.
Proof ofTheor em \[t1 . 3\ ]
=== ======= = == = = === == == ===
T he foll owi ng lemm a will beuse fu l in the pro o fof Theorem \[ t1.3\], andisof ind ep end e nt in ter est.
\[l4. 1 \] Let $u\in (1 ,\ , \infty ) $, $... | R}^n)$, $\mathcal{M}_{\Omega,\,b}$_is completely_continuous on $L^p(\mathbb{R}^n,\,w)$.
Proof of_Theorem \[t1.3\]
=========================
The_following_lemma will_be_useful in the_proof of Theorem_\[t1.3\], and is of_independent interest.
\[l4.1\] Let_$u\in_(1,\,\infty)$, $m\in \mathbb{N}\cup\{0\}$, $S$ be a subli... |
===================
It should be noted beforehand that in the present Appendix no approximation of the potential $\Phi(\eta)$ introduced by expression will be used, only the general properties of the kinetic coefficients $k(v)$ and $g(v)$ are taken into account. It enables us to make use of the results to be obtained... | = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
It should be noted beforehand that in the present Appendix no approximation of the potential $ \Phi(\eta)$ insert by formula will be used, only the general property of the kinetic coefficients $ k(v)$ and $ g(v)$ are taken into score. It enable us to make use of the results t... | ===================
It dhould be noted beforehakd that in the ptewent A'pendix no appruximation of the potential $\Pii(\etq)$ inteoduced by expression dill be uded, only the teneral properties of ths kinztmc coefficients $k(v)$ and $g(v)$ are taken intm xceount. It enables us to make use of tre resuktd to be obtaingd... | =================== It should be noted beforehand that present no approximation the potential $\Phi(\eta)$ used, the general properties the kinetic coefficients and $g(v)$ are taken into account. enables us to make use of the results to be obtained here in generalizations, e.g., to allow for the cutoff effects. Termina... | ===================
It should be noted beforehand That in the pResenT ApPenDiX no aPproXimation of the pOTentIal $\Phi(\eta)$ introduced by eXpresSiON wilL Be Used, oNly the gENeRAL prOpErTieS oF ThE kineTic CoefficIents $k(v)$ and $G(v)$ aRe Taken into accOUnT. It enables Us tO make use of thE reSults tO bE obTAined... | ===================
It sh ould be no ted b efo reh an d th at i n the presentA ppen dix no approximation o f the p o tent i al $\Ph i(\eta) $ i n t rod uc ed by e x pr essio n will be used, onl y t he general pro p er ties of th e k inetic coeff ici ents $ k( v)$ and $ g(v )$ ar e take n intoaccount.It enable ... | ===================
It should_be noted_beforehand that in the_present Appendix_no_approximation of_the_potential $\Phi(\eta)$ introduced_by expression will_be used, only the_general properties of_the_kinetic coefficients $k(v)$ and $g(v)$ are taken into account. It enables us to make_use_of the_results_to_be obtained... |
\in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \times e}({\mathbbm{k}}), B \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \times d}({\mathbbm{k}}) \\
C \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{d \times d}({\mathbbm{k}}) \end{array}
\; \mbox{and} \; {\mathsf{tr}}(A) + {\mathsf{tr}}(C) = 0 \right\}.$$ The goal of this section is to prove the foll... | \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \times e}({\mathbbm{k } }), B \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \times d}({\mathbbm{k } }) \\
C \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{d \times d}({\mathbbm{k } }) \end{array }
\; \mbox{and } \; { \mathsf{tr}}(A) + { \mathsf{tr}}(C) = 0 \right\}.$$ The goal of this section is to ... | \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \uimes e}({\mathbbm{k}}), B \in \opecatornaje{\mathsf{Oat}}_{e \times d}({\mathbbm{k}}) \\
C \in \operatirname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{d \times d}({\mathbbm{n}}) \end{arrqy}
\; \nvox{and} \; {\mefhsf{tr}}(A) + {\mathan{tr}}(C) = 0 \right\}.$$ The goak of this vection is to [ruvz the foll... | \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \times e}({\mathbbm{k}}), B \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \\ \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{d d}({\mathbbm{k}}) \end{array} \; = \right\}.$$ The goal this section is prove the following result. \[T:FrobAlg\] Let = J_{(e, d)}$ be the matrix from (\[E:formcanonique\]). Then the p... | \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \tImes e}({\mathbBm{k}}), B \iN \opEraToRnamE{\matHsf{Mat}}_{e \times d}({\mAThbbM{k}}) \\
C \in \operatorname{\mathsF{Mat}}_{d \TiMEs d}({\mAThBbm{k}}) \eNd{array}
\; \MBoX{ANd} \; {\mAtHsF{tr}}(a) + {\mAThSf{tr}}(C) = 0 \RigHt\}.$$ The goAl of this seCtiOn Is to prove the FOlL... | \in \operatorname{\mathsf {Mat}}_{e\time s e }({ \m athb bm{k }}), B \in \op e rato rname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \tim es d}({ \ ma thbbm {k}}) \ \
C \ in \ ope ra t or name{ \ma thsf{Ma t}}_{d \ti mes d }({\mathbbm{ k }} ) \end{arr ay}
\; \mbox{a nd} \; { \m ath s f{tr} }(A ) + { \maths f {tr}}( C) = 0 \r ig h t\}.$... | \in_\operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e \times_e}({\mathbbm{k}}), B \in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{e_\times d}({\mathbbm{k}})_\\
_ _C_\in \operatorname{\mathsf{Mat}}_{d \times_d}({\mathbbm{k}}) \end{array}
\;_\mbox{and} \; {\mathsf{tr}}(A)_+ {\mathsf{tr}}(C) =_0_\right\}.$$ The goal of this section is to prove the foll... |
*Wavelet Transforms and Localization Operators.* Birkhäuser Verlag, vol. 136, Basel, 2002.
M.-W. Wong *An introduction to pseudo-differential operators.* Series on Analysis, Applications and Computation, 6. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2014.
[^1]: E-mail addresses: paolo.boggiatto@unito... | * Wavelet Transforms and Localization Operators. * Birkhäuser Verlag, vol. 136, Basel, 2002.
M.-W. Wong * An introduction to pseudo - differential operators. * Series on Analysis, Applications and Computation, 6. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2014.
[ ^1 ]: E - mail address: paolo.bogg... | *Wagelet Transforms and Locxlization Operajoes.* Birnhäuser Verlag, xol. 136, Basel, 2002.
M.-W. Wong *An introdnctiin to pseudo-differential opdrators.* Svries on Qnalbsis, Applications and Computatjln, 6. Cocld Scientific Kublishing Cm. Pte. Ltd., Hackanraek, NJ, 2014.
[^1]: E-mail addresses: paolo.boggiattj@unito... | *Wavelet Transforms and Localization Operators.* Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, M.-W. Wong introduction to pseudo-differential and 6. World Scientific Co. Pte. Ltd., NJ, 2014. [^1]: E-mail addresses: paolo.boggiatto@unito.it, alessandro.oliaro@unito.it --- abstract: 'The two-pion correlation function can be defined as a rat... | *Wavelet Transforms and LocalIzation OpeRatorS.* BiRkhÄuSer VErlaG, vol. 136, Basel, 2002.
M.-W. WonG *an inTroduction to pseudo-diffErentIaL OperAToRs.* SerIes on AnALySIS, ApPlIcAtiOnS AnD CompUtaTion, 6. WorLd ScientifIc PUbLishing Co. Pte. lTd., hackensack, nJ, 2014.
[^1]: E-Mail addresseS: paOlo.bogGiAttO@Unito... | *Wavelet Transforms and L ocalizatio n Ope rat ors .* Bir khäu ser Verlag, vo l . 13 6, Basel, 2002.
M.-W. Wong * A n in t ro ducti on to p s eu d o -di ff er ent ia l o perat ors .* Seri es on Anal ysi s, Application s a nd Computa tio n, 6. WorldSci entifi cPub l ishin g C o. Pt e. Ltd . , Hack ensack, N J, 2... | *Wavelet_Transforms and_Localization Operators.* Birkhäuser Verlag,_vol. 136,_Basel,_2002.
M.-W. Wong_*An_introduction to pseudo-differential_operators.* Series on_Analysis, Applications and Computation,_6. World Scientific_Publishing_Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2014.
[^1]: E-mail addresses: paolo.boggiatto@unito... |
_{d}+\sum_{\vert\alpha\vert\geq 2}{\underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}\tau\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}}+\varepsilon_m$$
Where $\underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}=q_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots q_d^{\alpha_d}$, $\varepsilon_m=\underset{\alpha\in\mathbb{N}^d}{\sum}{(\big\langle \varphi^{p^m},\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}\big\rangle-\... | _ { d}+\sum_{\vert\alpha\vert\geq 2}{\underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}\tau\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}}+\varepsilon_m$$
Where $ \underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}=q_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots q_d^{\alpha_d}$, $ \varepsilon_m=\underset{\alpha\in\mathbb{N}^d}{\sum}{(\big\langle \varphi^{p^m},\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}\big\ra... | _{d}+\sul_{\vert\alpha\vert\geq 2}{\underllne{q}^{\alpha p^m}\tau\pcetial_{\uiderlins{g}}^{(\alpha)}}+\vxrepsilon_m$$
Where $\underline{q}^{\al'ha p^m}=q_1^{\alkka_1}\cdots q_d^{\alpha_d}$, $\vardpsilon_m=\ujderset{\aopha\mn\mathbb{N}^d}{\sum}{(\big\langle \varphi^{p^j},\iarticl_{\nnderline{g}}^{(\alpha)}\nig\rangle-\... | _{d}+\sum_{\vert\alpha\vert\geq 2}{\underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}\tau\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}}+\varepsilon_m$$ Where $\underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}=q_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots q_d^{\alpha_d}$, p^m})\tau\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}}\in$ and there $t\in\mathbb{N}$ such that Since it is clear the left hand of this exp... | _{d}+\sum_{\vert\alpha\vert\geq 2}{\underLine{q}^{\alpha P^m}\tau\ParTiaL_{\uNderLine{G}}^{(\alpha)}}+\varepsilON_m$$
WhEre $\underline{q}^{\alpha p^m}=q_1^{\aLpha_1}\cDoTS q_d^{\aLPhA_d}$, $\varEpsilon_M=\UnDERseT{\aLpHa\iN\mAThBb{N}^d}{\sUm}{(\bIg\langlE \varphi^{p^m},\pArtIaL_{\underline{g}}^{(\aLPhA)}\big\rangle-\... | _{d}+\sum_{\vert\alpha\ver t\geq 2}{\ under lin e{q }^ {\al phap^m}\tau\parti a l_{\ underline{g}}^{(\alpha )}}+\ va r epsi l on _m$$
Where$ \u n d erl in e{ q}^ {\ a lp ha p^ m}= q_1^{\a lpha_1}\cd ots q _d^{\alpha_d } $, $\varepsi lon _m=\underset {\a lpha\i n\ mat h bb{N} ^d} {\sum }{(\bi g \langl e \varphi ^{ p ^... | _{d}+\sum_{\vert\alpha\vert\geq 2}{\underline{q}^{\alpha_p^m}\tau\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}}+\varepsilon_m$$
Where $\underline{q}^{\alpha_p^m}=q_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots q_d^{\alpha_d}$, $\varepsilon_m=\underset{\alpha\in\mathbb{N}^d}{\sum}{(\big\langle \varphi^{p^m},\partial_{\underline{g}}^{(\alpha)}\big\rangle-\... |
05].
Global Properties of the EUADP sample
=====================================
\
The emission redshifts of the 250 EUADP sample quasars are initially obtained from the Simbad catalogue and later double checked for the cases where Ly$\alpha$ emission from the quasar is covered by our data. The Ly$\alpha$ emission f... | 05 ].
Global Properties of the EUADP sample
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
\
The emission redshifts of the 250 EUADP sample quasar are initially prevail from the Simbad catalogue and later doubly checked for the case where Ly$\alpha$ emission from the quasar is bree... | 05].
Glohal Properties of the EUXDP sample
=====================================
\
The emission redshjfts of ghe 250 EUADP sample quasars arx inutialoy obtained from the Skmbad catwlogue abd leter double checked for bke caacs whzrx Ly$\alpha$ emisslon from tha quasar is coeefeb by our data. The Ly$\alpha$ emission f... | 05]. Global Properties of the EUADP sample The redshifts of 250 EUADP sample the catalogue and later checked for the where Ly$\alpha$ emission from the quasar covered by our data. The Ly$\alpha$ emission for 5 quasars (i.e., QSOJ0332-4455, QSOB0528-2505, QSOB1114-0822 and QSOJ2346+1247) is not seen because of the prese... | 05].
Global Properties of the EUADp sample
=====================================
\
The EmissIon RedShIfts Of thE 250 EUADP sample quASars Are initially obtained frOm the siMBad cATaLogue And lateR DoUBLe cHeCkEd fOr THe Cases WheRe Ly$\alpHa$ emission FroM tHe quasar is coVErEd by our datA. ThE Ly$\alpha$ emisSioN f... | 05].
Global Properties of the EUADP samp le=== == ==== ==== ============== = ==== =====
\
The emission reds hi f ts o f t he 25 0 EUADP sa m p lequ as ars a r einiti all y obtai ned from t heSi mbad catalog u eand laterdou ble checkedfor the c as esw hereLy$ \alph a$ emi s sion f rom the q ua s ar isc overedb ... | 05].
Global Properties_of the_EUADP sample
=====================================
\
The emission redshifts_of the_250_EUADP sample_quasars_are initially obtained_from the Simbad_catalogue and later double_checked for the_cases_where Ly$\alpha$ emission from the quasar is covered by our data. The Ly$\alpha$ emission_f... |
, EoS = BsK20}.
We have estimated the spin-dependent capture cross section shown in Figure \[fig:DD\] by
1. Scaling the spin-independent capture cross section by a factor of $$\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n} (\langle S_n\rangle + \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_n = 1/2$, $\langle S_n\rangle = 1/2$ ... | , EoS = BsK20 }.
We have estimated the spin - dependent capture cross incision usher in Figure \[fig: DD\ ] by
1. Scaling the spin - independent capture hybrid section by a factor of $ $ \left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n } (\langle S_n\rangle + \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $ J_n = 1/2 $, $ \langl... | , EoD = BsK20}.
We have estimated uhe spin-dependent capturx cross section shown in Figure \[fig:DD\] by
1. Sralibg tht spin-independent cxpture crlss sectuon uy a factor of $$\lxrt[\frac{4}{3}\fvcc{J_n+1}{J_h} (\lanylx S_n\rangle + \lannle S_p\rangla)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_t = 1/2$, $\pangle S_n\rangle = 1/2$ ... | , EoS = BsK20}. We have estimated capture section shown Figure \[fig:DD\] by cross by a factor $$\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n} (\langle S_n\rangle \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_n = 1/2$, S_n\rangle = 1/2$ and $\langle S_p\rangle = 0$ for scattering on neutrons, and\ To calculate pasta scattering w... | , EoS = BsK20}.
We have estimated the sPin-dependeNt capTurE crOsS secTion Shown in Figure \[fIG:DD\] bY
1. Scaling the spin-indepenDent cApTUre cROsS sectIon by a fACtOR Of $$\lEfT[\fRac{4}{3}\FrAC{J_N+1}{J_n} (\laNglE S_n\rangLe + \langle S_p\RanGlE)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_N = 1/2$, $\LaNgle S_n\rangLe = 1/2$ ... | , EoS = BsK20}.
We have e stimated t he sp in- dep en dent cap ture cross sec t ionshown in Figure \[fig: DD\]by
1.Sc aling the sp i n- i n dep en de ntca p tu re cr oss sectio n by a fac tor o f $$\left[\f r ac {4}{3}\fra c{J _n+1}{J_n} ( \la ngle S _n \ra n gle + \l angle S_p\r a ngle)^ 2\right]^ {- 1 }~,$$w ... | , EoS_= BsK20}.
We_have estimated the spin-dependent_capture cross_section_shown in_Figure_\[fig:DD\] by
1. _Scaling the spin-independent_capture cross section by_a factor of_$$\left[\frac{4}{3}\frac{J_n+1}{J_n}_(\langle S_n\rangle + \langle S_p\rangle)^2\right]^{-1}~,$$ where $J_n = 1/2$, $\langle S_n\rangle = 1/2$ ... |
this periodicity in $(z,z')$ is reflected in a similar periodicity of various asymptotic properties of $z$-measures, see Sections 10 and 11 of [@BO4].
### Unitarity
Recall that the $z$-measures are positive if either $z'=\bar z$ or $z,z'\in(n,n+1)$ for some $n$. By analogy with representation theory of $SL(2)$, thes... | this periodicity in $ (z, z')$ is reflected in a similar periodicity of diverse asymptotic place of $ z$-measures, see Sections 10 and 11 of [ @BO4 ].
# # # Unitarity
Recall that the $ z$-measures are positive if either $ z'=\bar z$ or $ z, z'\in(n, n+1)$ for some $ n$. By doctrine of analogy with representation ... | thls periodicity in $(z,z')$ is veflected in a snnilar 'eriodidity of xarious asymptotic propertied if $z$-mtcsures, see Sections 10 and 11 of [@HO4].
### Unitaeity
Cecall that the $v$-jeasures are llsitnvx if either $z'=\bat z$ or $z,z'\in(n,t+1)$ for some $n$. Bf xnclogy with representation theory of $FL(2)$, thes... | this periodicity in $(z,z')$ is reflected in periodicity various asymptotic of $z$-measures, see [@BO4]. Unitarity Recall that $z$-measures are positive either $z'=\bar z$ or $z,z'\in(n,n+1)$ for $n$. By analogy with representation theory of $SL(2)$, these cases were called the and the complementary series. Observe tha... | this periodicity in $(z,z')$ is reflEcted in a siMilar PerIodIcIty oF varIous asymptotic PRopeRties of $z$-measures, see SecTions 10 AnD 11 Of [@BO4].
### uNiTaritY
Recall THaT THe $z$-MeAsUreS aRE pOsitiVe iF either $Z'=\bar z$ or $z,z'\iN(n,n+1)$ FoR some $n$. By analOGy With represEntAtion theory oF $SL(2)$, Thes... | this periodicity in $(z,z ')$ is ref lecte d i n a s imil ar p eriodicity ofv ario us asymptotic properti es of $ z $-me a su res,see Sec t io n s 10 a nd 11 o f [ @BO4] .
### Uni tarity
Re cal lthat the $z$ - me asures are po sitive if ei the r $z'= \b arz $ or$z, z'\in (n,n+1 ) $ forsome $n$. B y analo g ... | this_periodicity in_$(z,z')$ is reflected in_a similar_periodicity_of various_asymptotic_properties of $z$-measures,_see Sections 10_and 11 of [@BO4].
###_Unitarity
Recall that the_$z$-measures_are positive if either $z'=\bar z$ or $z,z'\in(n,n+1)$ for some $n$. By analogy with_representation_theory of_$SL(2)$,_thes... |
, these imply embeddedness. Also, [(\[e:boundary\])]{} shows that there is some $r_0$ such that the boundary of the graph in [(\[e:graphical\])]{} lies outside a circle $B_{r_0}(F_N(t,0))$ for all $N$. And [(\[e:boundaryinfinity\])]{} shows that for all $x \leq 0$ (i.e. in the part of the image $F_N(\Omega_N)$ below th... | , these imply embeddedness. Also, [ (\[e: boundary\ ]) ] { } shows that there is some $ r_0 $ such that the limit of the graph in [ (\[e: graphical\ ]) ] { } dwell outside a circle $ B_{r_0}(F_N(t,0))$ for all $ N$. And [ (\[e: boundaryinfinity\ ]) ] { } shows that for all $ ten \leq 0 $ (i.e. in the function of the im... | , thfse imply embeddedness. Auso, [(\[e:boundary\])]{} skiws thet thers is somd $r_0$ such that the boundary oh thw grakk in [(\[e:graphical\])]{} lies outside w circle $B_{r_0}(F_I(t,0))$ for all $N$. And [(\[e:boundavvinfihlty\])]{} skoxs that for all $x \leq 0$ (i.e. in the part ox ghz image $F_N(\Omega_N)$ below th... | , these imply embeddedness. Also, [(\[e:boundary\])]{} shows is $r_0$ such the boundary of outside circle $B_{r_0}(F_N(t,0))$ for $N$. And [(\[e:boundaryinfinity\])]{} that for all $x \leq 0$ in the part of the image $F_N(\Omega_N)$ below the $\{x_3=0\}$ plane), these boundaries the graph in [(\[e:graphical\])]{} actua... | , these imply embeddedness. AlsO, [(\[e:boundary\])]{} Shows ThaT thErE is sOme $r_0$ Such that the bouNDary Of the graph in [(\[e:graphical\])]{} Lies oUtSIde a CIrCle $B_{r_0}(f_N(t,0))$ for aLL $N$. aND [(\[e:bOuNdAryInFInIty\])]{} shOws That for All $x \leq 0$ (i.e. iN thE pArt of the imagE $f_N(\omega_N)$ beloW th... | , these imply embeddedness . Also, [( \[e:b oun dar y\ ])]{ } sh ows that there is s ome $r_0$ such that th e bou nd a ry o f t he gr aph in[ (\ [ e :gr ap hi cal \] ) ]{ } lie s o utsidea circle $ B_{ r_ 0}(F_N(t,0)) $ f or all $N$ . A nd [(\[e:bou nda ryinfi ni ty\ ] )]{}sho ws th at for all $x \leq 0$(i . e. int ... | , these_imply embeddedness._Also, [(\[e:boundary\])]{} shows that_there is_some_$r_0$ such_that_the boundary of_the graph in_[(\[e:graphical\])]{} lies outside a_circle $B_{r_0}(F_N(t,0))$ for_all_$N$. And [(\[e:boundaryinfinity\])]{} shows that for all $x \leq 0$ (i.e. in the part_of_the image_$F_N(\Omega_N)$_below_th... |
of d = 11 Supergravity on AdS$_4 \times S^7$]{},” [*JHEP*]{} [**1203**]{} (2012) 099, [[1112.6131]{}](http://arXiv.org/abs/1112.6131). F. Benini and N. Bobev, “[Two-dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c-extremization]{},” [[1302.4451]{}](http://arXiv.org/abs/1302.4451). P. Szepietowski, “[Comments on a-maximizat... | of d = 11 Supergravity on AdS$_4 \times S^7 $ ] { }, ” [ * JHEP * ] { } [ * * 1203 * * ] { } (2012) 099, [ [ 1112.6131]{}](http://arXiv.org / abs/1112.6131). F. Benini and N. Bobev, “ [ Two - dimensional SCFTs from wrapped branes and c - extremization ] { }, ” [ [ 1302.4451]{}](http://arXiv.org / abs/1302.4451). P.... | of d = 11 Supergravity on AdS$_4 \times S^7$]{},” [*JHEP*]{} [**1203**]{} (2012) 099, [[1112.6131]{}](http://acXiv.org/zbs/1112.6131). F. Benkni and N. Bobev, “[Two-dimensionap WCFTs from wrapped branes avd c-extrelization]{},” [[1302.4451]{}](httk://arXiv.org/abs/1302.4451). P. Sze'jetowskl, “[Comjcnts mi a-maximizat... | of d = 11 Supergravity on AdS$_4 [*JHEP*]{} (2012) 099, F. Benini and wrapped and c-extremization]{},” [[1302.4451]{}](http://arXiv.org/abs/1302.4451). Szepietowski, “[Comments on from gauged supergravity]{},” [*JHEP*]{} [**1212**]{} (2012) [[1209.3025]{}](http://arXiv.org/abs/1209.3025). P. Karndumri and E. O Colgain,... | of d = 11 Supergravity on AdS$_4 \times s^7$]{},” [*JHEP*]{} [**1203**]{} (2012) 099, [[1112.6131]{}](http://aRXiv.oRg/aBs/1112.6131). F. beNini And N. bobev, “[Two-dimensIOnal sCFTs from wrapped branes And c-eXtREmizATiOn]{},” [[1302.4451]{}](httP://arXiv.oRG/aBS/1302.4451). p. SzEpIeTowSkI, “[coMmentS on A-maximiZat... | of d = 11 Supergravity on AdS$_4 \t imesS^7 $]{ }, ” [* JHEP *]{} [**1203** ] {} ( 2012) 099, [[1112.6131 ]{}]( ht t p:// a rX iv.or g/abs/1 1 12 . 6 131 ). F . B en i ni andN.Bobev,“[Two-dime nsi on al SCFTs fro m w rapped bra nes and c-extre miz ation] {} ,”[ [1302 .44 51]{} ](http : //arXi v.org/abs /1 3 02.44... | of_d =_11 Supergravity on AdS$_4_\times S^7$]{},”_[*JHEP*]{}_[**1203**]{} (2012)_099,_[[1112.6131]{}](http://arXiv.org/abs/1112.6131). F. Benini and_N. Bobev, “[Two-dimensional SCFTs_from wrapped branes and_c-extremization]{},” [[1302.4451]{}](http://arXiv.org/abs/1302.4451). P. Szepietowski,_“[Comments_on a-maximizat... |
M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alpha=-1.33$ IMF from $M=0.15M_\odot$ all the way down to zero mass, we obtain $123.5 M_\odot$ of unseen dwarfs, thus totaling $440.5 M_\odot$ in living stars and brown dwarfs. To account for the remnants we need to adopt an initial mass-final mass relation. We used the semi-empirical r... | M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $ \alpha=-1.33 $ IMF from $ M=0.15M_\odot$ all the way down to zero mass, we obtain $ 123.5 M_\odot$ of unobserved dwarf, thus totaling $ 440.5 M_\odot$ in survive ace and brown dwarfs. To account for the end we want to adopt an initial aggregate - concluding mass relation. We use the sem... | M_\odlt$. By extrapolating the $\xlpha=-1.33$ IMF from $M=0.15M_\odot$ ell the way dowv to zero mass, we obtain $123.5 M_\ovot$ if unween dwarfs, thus totalkng $440.5 M_\odon$ in livibg suars and brown dwedfs. To accounf for vhe remnants we need to agopt an initian oads-final mass relation. We used the sqmi-empitifal r... | M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alpha=-1.33$ IMF from the down to mass, we obtain thus $440.5 M_\odot$ in stars and brown To account for the remnants we to adopt an initial mass-final mass relation. We used the semi-empirical relation proposed Renzini & Ciotti (1993), with white dwarf remnants of mass $M_{\rm WD}=0.48... | M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alPha=-1.33$ IMF from $m=0.15M_\odoT$ alL thE wAy doWn to Zero mass, we obtaIN $123.5 M_\odOt$ of unseen dwarfs, thus toTalinG $440.5 M_\ODot$ iN LiVing sTars and BRoWN DwaRfS. TO acCoUNt For thE reMnants wE need to adoPt aN iNitial mass-fiNAl Mass relatiOn. WE used the semi-EmpIrical R... | M_\odot$. By extrapolating the $\alp ha=-1 .33 $ I MF fro m $M =0.15M_\odot$a ll t he way down to zero ma ss, w eo btai n $ 123.5 M_\odo t $o f un se en dw ar f s, thus to taling$440.5 M_\ odo t$ in living s t ar s and brow n d warfs. To ac cou nt for t her emnan tswe ne ed toa dopt a n initial m a ss-fin a ... | M_\odot$. By_extrapolating the_$\alpha=-1.33$ IMF from $M=0.15M_\odot$_all the_way_down to_zero_mass, we obtain_$123.5 M_\odot$ of_unseen dwarfs, thus totaling_$440.5 M_\odot$ in_living_stars and brown dwarfs. To account for the remnants we need to adopt an_initial_mass-final mass_relation._We_used the semi-empirical r... |
4]). Let $\mathcal{F}_\text{a.e.}(V)$ be the set of congruence classes of constructible functions where $f \sim g$ if $f-g=0$ almost everywhere.
\[lemma\_inclusion\_into\_constr\_functions\] Denote by $Z$ the abelian group generated by all formal integral combination of compact convex polytopes in $V$. Let $W \subset ... | 4 ]). Let $ \mathcal{F}_\text{a.e.}(V)$ be the set of congruence classes of constructible function where $ f \sim g$ if $ farad - g=0 $ almost everywhere.
\[lemma\_inclusion\_into\_constr\_functions\ ] Denote by $ Z$ the abelian group generated by all formal built-in combination of compact convex polytopes in $ V$. ... | 4]). Leh $\mathcal{F}_\text{a.e.}(V)$ be the set of congrueuxe clavses or constrjctible functions where $f \sil t$ if $d-g=0$ almost everywhere.
\[leoma\_incluspon\_into\_cobstr\_hunctions\] Denote by $Z$ thc abemlan gxonp generated by all forman integral comtivacion of compact convex polytopes in $D$. Let $W \skbset ... | 4]). Let $\mathcal{F}_\text{a.e.}(V)$ be the set of of functions where \sim g$ if by the abelian group by all formal combination of compact convex polytopes in Let $W \subset Z$ denote the subgroup generated by lower-dimensional polytopes and elements the form $[P \cup Q]+[P \cap Q]-[P]-[Q]$ where $P \cup Q$ is convex.... | 4]). Let $\mathcal{F}_\text{a.e.}(V)$ be the seT of congrueNce clAssEs oF cOnstRuctIble functions wHEre $f \Sim g$ if $f-g=0$ almost everywheRe.
\[lemMa\_INcluSIoN\_into\_Constr\_fUNcTIOns\] deNoTe bY $Z$ THe AbeliAn gRoup genErated by alL foRmAl integral coMBiNation of coMpaCt convex polyTopEs in $V$. LEt $w \suBSet ... | 4]). Let $\mathcal{F}_\tex t{a.e.}(V) $ bethe se tof c ongr uence classeso f co nstructible functionswhere $ f \si m g $ if$f-g=0$ al m o stev er ywh er e .
\[le mma \_inclu sion\_into \_c on str\_functio n s\ ] Denote b y $ Z$ the abeli angroupge ner a ted b y a ll fo rmal i n tegral combinat io n of co m pact c... | 4]). Let_$\mathcal{F}_\text{a.e.}(V)$ be_the set of congruence_classes of_constructible_functions where_$f_\sim g$ if_$f-g=0$ almost everywhere.
\[lemma\_inclusion\_into\_constr\_functions\]_Denote by $Z$ the_abelian group generated_by_all formal integral combination of compact convex polytopes in $V$. Let $W \subset ... |
^{2}_{K,K^{*}})\mathcal{D}_{K,K^{*}}\right]
\mathcal{R}+F_{c,v}(1-\mathcal{R}),\,\,\,\,\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{R}_{s}\mathcal{R}_{t}$ with $$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:RSRT}
&&\mathcal{R}_{s}=
\frac{1}{2}
\left[1+\tanh\left(\frac{s-s_{\mathrm{Regge}}}{s_{0}} \right)
\right],\nonumber\\
&&\mathcal... | ^{2}_{K, K^{*}})\mathcal{D}_{K, K^{*}}\right ]
\mathcal{R}+F_{c, v}(1-\mathcal{R}),\,\,\,\,\end{aligned}$$ where $ \mathcal{R}=\mathcal{R}_{s}\mathcal{R}_{t}$ with $ $ \begin{aligned }
\label{eq: RSRT }
& & \mathcal{R}_{s}=
\frac{1}{2 }
\left[1+\tanh\left(\frac{s - s_{\mathrm{Regge}}}{s_{0 } } \right)
\... | ^{2}_{K,K^{*}})\mwthcal{D}_{K,K^{*}}\right]
\mathcal{R}+F_{c,y}(1-\mathcal{R}),\,\,\,\,\end{aliguwd}$$ whece $\mathdal{R}=\mathzal{R}_{s}\mathcal{R}_{t}$ with $$\begin{alijned}
\oabel{tz:RSRT}
&&\mathcal{R}_{s}=
\frac{1}{2}
\ueft[1+\tanh\lvft(\frac{s-s_{\nathcm{Regge}}}{s_{0}} \right)
\right],\nonumbed\\
&&\latheao... | ^{2}_{K,K^{*}})\mathcal{D}_{K,K^{*}}\right] \mathcal{R}+F_{c,v}(1-\mathcal{R}),\,\,\,\,\end{aligned}$$ where $\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{R}_{s}\mathcal{R}_{t}$ with $$\begin{aligned} \label{eq:RSRT} \left[1+\tanh\left(\frac{s-s_{\mathrm{Regge}}}{s_{0}} \right],\nonumber\\ &&\mathcal{R}_{t}= \left[1+\tanh\left(\frac{|t|-t_{\m... | ^{2}_{K,K^{*}})\mathcal{D}_{K,K^{*}}\right]
\mathcal{R}+f_{c,v}(1-\mathcal{r}),\,\,\,\,\end{aLigNed}$$ WhEre $\mAthcAl{R}=\mathcal{R}_{s}\maTHcal{r}_{t}$ with $$\begin{aligned}
\labeL{eq:RSrT}
&&\MAthcAL{R}_{S}=
\frac{1}{2}
\Left[1+\tanH\LeFT(\FraC{s-S_{\mAthRm{rEgGe}}}{s_{0}} \riGht)
\Right],\noNumber\\
&&\mathCal... | ^{2}_{K,K^{*}})\mathcal{D} _{K,K^{*}} \righ t]\ma th cal{ R}+F _{c,v}(1-\math c al{R }),\,\,\,\,\end{aligne d}$$wh e re $ \ ma thcal {R}=\ma t hc a l {R} _{ s} \ma th c al {R}_{ t}$ with $ $\begin{al ign ed }
\label{eq: R SR T}
&&\math cal {R}_{s}=
\fr ac{ 1}{2}\l eft [ 1+\ta nh\ left( \frac{ s -s_{\m athrm{Reg ge } }... | ^{2}_{K,K^{*}})\mathcal{D}_{K,K^{*}}\right]
\mathcal{R}+F_{c,v}(1-\mathcal{R}),\,\,\,\,\end{aligned}$$ where_$\mathcal{R}=\mathcal{R}_{s}\mathcal{R}_{t}$ with_$$\begin{aligned}
\label{eq:RSRT}
&&\mathcal{R}_{s}=
\frac{1}{2}
\left[1+\tanh\left(\frac{s-s_{\mathrm{Regge}}}{s_{0}} \right)
_ \right],\nonumber\\
&&\mathcal... |
the beginning to get the $q$-expansions of the newforms from the $q$-expansions of the forms we have just computed.
This method is faster than the classical one for large $B$.
For fixed prime level $\ell$, the number of bit operations required to compute the $q$-expansion of the newforms in $S_2\big(\Gamma_1(\ell)\b... | the beginning to get the $ q$-expansions of the newforms from the $ q$-expansions of the forms we have just computed.
This method acting is fast than the classical one for big $ B$.
For fasten prime level $ \ell$, the issue of morsel operations necessitate to compute the $ q$-expansion of the newforms in $ S_2\bi... | thf beginning to get the $q$-txpansions of the newforks froj the $q$-ebpansions of the forms we hate jyst cimputed.
This method is waster thwn the coassmcal one for larjs $B$.
For nnxed lvime nxvel $\ell$, the nukber of bid operations raqjixed to compute the $q$-expansion of the newforks in $S_2\big(\Gamma_1(\ejl)\b... | the beginning to get the $q$-expansions of from $q$-expansions of forms we have faster the classical one large $B$. For prime level $\ell$, the number of operations required to compute the $q$-expansion of the newforms in $S_2\big(\Gamma_1(\ell)\big)$ to precision with the algorithm described above is quasi-linear in $... | the beginning to get the $q$-expaNsions of thE newfOrmS frOm The $q$-ExpaNsions of the forMS we hAve just computed.
This metHod is FaSTer tHAn The clAssical ONe FOR laRgE $B$.
for FiXEd Prime LevEl $\ell$, thE number of bIt oPeRations requiREd To compute tHe $q$-Expansion of tHe nEwformS iN $S_2\bIG(\GammA_1(\elL)\b... | the beginning to get the$q$-expans ionsofthe n ewfo rmsfrom the $q$-e x pans ions of the forms we h ave j us t com p ut ed.
This me t ho d isfa st erth a nthe c las sical o ne for lar ge$B $.
For fixe d p rime level $\ ell$, the nu mbe r of b it op e ratio nsrequi red to comput e the $q$ -e x pansio n of the n ... | the_beginning to_get the $q$-expansions of_the newforms_from_the $q$-expansions_of_the forms we_have just computed.
This_method is faster than_the classical one_for_large $B$.
For fixed prime level $\ell$, the number of bit operations required to compute_the_$q$-expansion of_the_newforms_in $S_2\big(\Gamma_1(\ell)\b... |
l,n)$).
By Proposition \[prop:Omega\], it suffices to show that any two points in $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ can be connected by a geodesic curve in $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$. By Proposition \[prop:OmegaGrass\], $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ is the image of $\operatorname{Gr}(k,l)$ embedded isometrically in $\operatorname{Gr}... | l, n)$).
By Proposition \[prop: Omega\ ], it suffices to show that any two points in $ \Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ can be connected by a geodetic curvature in $ \Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$. By Proposition \[prop: OmegaGrass\ ], $ \Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ is the image of $ \operatorname{Gr}(k, l)$ embedded isometrically i... | l,n)$).
Bj Proposition \[prop:Omega\], iu suffices to shoc that eny two points kn $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ can be connerted by a geodesic curve in $\Omeea_{-}(\mathbf{B})$. By Propisitmon \[prop:OmegaGrass\], $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ ls thz mmage of $\operatprname{Gr}(k,l)$ embedded isomatfieally in $\operatorname{Gr}... | l,n)$). By Proposition \[prop:Omega\], it suffices to any points in can be connected $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$. Proposition \[prop:OmegaGrass\], $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ the image of embedded isometrically in $\operatorname{Gr}(k,n)$. So by \[lem:infty\], for any $\mathbf{X}_1,\mathbf{X}_2 \in \operatorname{Gr}(k,l)$, $... | l,n)$).
By Proposition \[prop:Omega\], iT suffices tO show ThaT anY tWo poInts In $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ CAn be Connected by a geodesic cuRve in $\omEGa_{-}(\maTHbF{B})$. By PRopositIOn \[PROp:OMeGagraSs\], $\oMeGa_{-}(\matHbf{b})$ is the iMage of $\operAtoRnAme{Gr}(k,l)$ embedDEd IsometricaLly In $\operatornaMe{GR}... | l,n)$).
By Proposition \[ prop:Omega \], i t s uff ic es t o sh ow that any tw o poi nts in $\Omega_{-}(\ma thbf{ B} ) $ ca n b e con nectedb ya geo de si c c ur v ein $\ Ome ga_{-}( \mathbf{B} )$. B y Propositio n \ [prop:Omeg aGr ass\], $\Ome ga_ {-}(\m at hbf { B})$isthe i mage o f $\ope ratorname {G r }(k,l) ... | l,n)$).
By Proposition \[prop:Omega\],_it suffices_to show that any_two points_in_$\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$ can_be_connected by a_geodesic curve in_$\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$. By Proposition \[prop:OmegaGrass\], $\Omega_{-}(\mathbf{B})$_is the image_of_$\operatorname{Gr}(k,l)$ embedded isometrically in $\operatorname{Gr}... |
Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. Technical Report R-393, Computer Science Department, UCLA.
()...
Pearl, J. and E. Bareinboim (2014). External validity: From do-calculus to transportability across populations. *Statistical Science* [29]{}(4),??–??
().. In..,.
Pearl, J. and T. Verma (1991... | Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. Technical Report R-393, Computer Science Department, UCLA.
()...
Pearl, J. and E. Bareinboim (2014). External cogency: From bash - calculus to transportability across populations. * Statistical Science * [ 29]{}(4), ?? –? ?
().. In.. ,.
Pearl, J.... | Eihht myths about causalitn and structural equatimn modsls. Techvical Report R-393, Computer Scieice Eeparuient, UCLA.
()...
Pearl, J. avd E. Bareijboim (2014). Ezterial validity: From do-calcmjus fl trcnwportability agross populdtions. *Statisthcxl Science* [29]{}(4),??–??
().. In..,.
Pearl, J. and T. Verma (1991... | Eight myths about causality and structural equation Report Computer Science UCLA. ()... Pearl, External From do-calculus to across populations. *Statistical [29]{}(4),??–?? ().. In..,. Pearl, J. and Verma (1991). A theory of inferred causation. In J. Allen, R. Fikes, and Sandewall (Eds.), [*Principles of Knowledge Repr... | Eight myths about causality aNd structurAl equAtiOn mOdEls. TEchnIcal Report R-393, ComPUter science Department, UCLA.
()...
PEarl, J. AnD e. BarEInBoim (2014). EXternal VAlIDIty: frOm Do-cAlCUlUs to tRanSportabIlity acrosS poPuLations. *StatiSTiCal Science* [29]{}(4),??–??
().. in..,.
PEarl, J. and T. VerMa (1991... | Eight myths about causali ty and str uctur alequ at ionmode ls. TechnicalR epor t R-393, Computer Scie nce D ep a rtme n t, UCLA .
().. .
P e arl ,J. an dE .Barei nbo im (201 4). Extern alva lidity: From do -calculustotransportabi lit y acro ss po p ulati ons . *St atisti c al Sci ence* [29 ]{ } (4),?? – ??
(). ... | Eight_myths about_causality and structural equation_models. Technical_Report_R-393, Computer_Science_Department, UCLA.
()...
Pearl, J._and E. Bareinboim (2014)._External validity: From do-calculus_to transportability across_populations._*Statistical Science* [29]{}(4),??–??
().. In..,.
Pearl, J. and T. Verma (1991... |
that detailed in Algorithm \[algo\_vi\], where steps 7, 8, 9 and 10 are modified to include the time dependent parameters. It follows that for the user-specific parameters the update equations take the form: $$\begin{gathered}
\lambda_{ir}^{(\alpha)} = a^{(\alpha)}+\sum_{j=1}^{{\vert{V}\vert}}\sum_{t=1}^T \frac{A_{ijt... | that detailed in Algorithm \[algo\_vi\ ], where steps 7, 8, 9 and 10 are modified to include the meter pendent parameters. It follows that for the user - specific parameter the update equations take the shape: $ $ \begin{gathered }
\lambda_{ir}^{(\alpha) } = a^{(\alpha)}+\sum_{j=1}^{{\vert{V}\vert}}\sum_{t=1}^T \fr... | thwt detailed in Algorithm \[xlgo\_vi\], where stgpw 7, 8, 9 aid 10 are modifiea to include the time dependxnt paramtners. It follows that wor the uder-specidic karameters the upvzte equations bake chx form: $$\begin{gatmered}
\lambda_{hr}^{(\alpha)} = a^{(\alphd)}+\sjm_{l=1}^{{\vert{V}\vert}}\sum_{t=1}^T \frac{A_{ijt... | that detailed in Algorithm \[algo\_vi\], where steps 9 10 are to include the that the user-specific parameters update equations take form: $$\begin{gathered} \lambda_{ir}^{(\alpha)} = a^{(\alpha)}+\sum_{j=1}^{{\vert{V}\vert}}\sum_{t=1}^T \frac{A_{ijt}\theta_{ijt}\chi_{ijtr}}{1-e^{-\theta_{ijt}}},\ = \frac{\nu_i^{(\alph... | that detailed in Algorithm \[alGo\_vi\], where sTeps 7, 8, 9 aNd 10 aRe mOdIfieD to iNclude the time dEPendEnt parameters. It follows That fOr THe usER-sPecifIc paramETeRS The UpDaTe eQuATiOns taKe tHe form: $$\bEgin{gatherEd}
\lAmBda_{ir}^{(\alpha)} = a^{(\aLPhA)}+\sum_{j=1}^{{\vert{V}\VerT}}\sum_{t=1}^T \frac{A_{iJt... | that detailed in Algorith m \[algo\_ vi\], wh ere s teps 7,8, 9 and 10 ar e mod ified to include the t ime d ep e nden t p arame ters. I t f o l low sth atfo r t he us er- specifi c paramete rsth e update equ a ti ons take t heform: $$\beg in{ gather ed }
\ l ambda _{i r}^{( \alpha ) } = a^ {(\alpha) }+ \ sum_{... | that_detailed in_Algorithm \[algo\_vi\], where steps 7,_8, 9_and_10 are_modified_to include the_time dependent parameters._It follows that for_the user-specific parameters_the_update equations take the form: $$\begin{gathered}
\lambda_{ir}^{(\alpha)} = a^{(\alpha)}+\sum_{j=1}^{{\vert{V}\vert}}\sum_{t=1}^T \frac{A_{ijt... |
redder HB than would be expected for its metal abundance. This second parameter effect is common among the Galaxy’s dSph companions and it is also particularly prevalent among the globular clusters that lie, like the dSphs, in the outer regions of the galactic halo.
Considerable effort has gone into attempting to und... | redder HB than would be expected for its metal abundance. This second parameter consequence is coarse among the Galaxy ’s dSph companions and it is also particularly prevailing among the globular clusters that lie, like the dSphs, in the forbidden regions of the galactic aura.
Considerable effort has gone into under... | refder HB than would be exkected for its mejao abunvance. Tgis secovd parameter effect is commoi aming tye Galaxy’s dSph compankons and pt is alsi pacticularly prevalent amoky the nlobuner clusters thaj lie, like tve dSphs, in tha uucer regions of the galactic halo.
Consyderablr fffort has gong intp attsmpting to und... | redder HB than would be expected for abundance. second parameter is common among it also particularly prevalent the globular clusters lie, like the dSphs, in the regions of the galactic halo. Considerable effort has gone into attempting to understand origin of the second parameter effect and its dependence on galactoce... | redder HB than would be expectEd for its meTal abUndAncE. THis sEconD parameter effeCT is cOmmon among the Galaxy’s dSPh comPaNIons ANd It is aLso partICuLARly PrEvAleNt AMoNg the GloBular clUsters that Lie, LiKe the dSphs, in THe Outer regioNs oF the galactic HalO.
ConsiDeRabLE effoRt hAs gonE into aTTemptiNg to und... | redder HB than would be e xpected fo r its me tal a bund ance . This secondp aram eter effect is commonamong t h e Ga l ax y’s d Sph com p an i o nsan ditis al so pa rti cularly prevalent am on g the globul a rclusters t hat lie, like t hedSphs, i n t h e out erregio ns oft he gal actic hal o.
Consi d erablee ... | redder_HB than_would be expected for_its metal_abundance._This second_parameter_effect is common_among the Galaxy’s_dSph companions and it_is also particularly_prevalent_among the globular clusters that lie, like the dSphs, in the outer regions of_the_galactic halo.
Considerable_effort_has_gone into attempting to und... |
{P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (these stars have Grundy value 2);
- ${\mathcal C_2^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars $S$ such that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=2$ and $S$ contains one or three paths of length $2$;
- ${\mathcal C_3^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars $S$ such that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=3$ and S contains one or three paths of length $2... | { P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (these stars have Grundy value 2);
- $ { \mathcal C_2^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars $ S$ such that $ { \mathcal{G}}(S)=2 $ and $ S$ control one or three path of length $ 2 $;
- $ { \mathcal C_3^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars $ S$ such that $ { \mathcal{G}}(S)=3 $ and S hold one or three pa... | {P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (hhese stars have Grundy yalue 2);
- ${\mathcal C_2^{\Box}}$: snbdividsd stars $S$ such that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=2$ and $S$ cintaibs one or three paths uf length $2$;
- ${\mathxal R_3^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars $S$ such tgwt ${\mctical{G}}(S)=3$ and S coktains one mr three paths ow pength $2... | {P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (these stars have Grundy value 2); C_2^{\Box}}$: stars $S$ that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=2$ and paths length $2$; - C_3^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars such that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=3$ and S contains or three paths of length $2$; - For $i\in \{0,1,2,3\}$, $\mathcal C_i$: subdivided $S$ with ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=... | {P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (these stars have Grundy valUe 2);
- ${\mathcal C_2^{\box}}$: suBdiVidEd StarS $S$ suCh that ${\mathcal{G}}(s)=2$ And $S$ Contains one or three pathS of leNgTH $2$;
- ${\matHCaL C_3^{\Box}}$: SubdiviDEd STArs $s$ sUcH thAt ${\MAtHcal{G}}(s)=3$ anD S contaIns one or thRee PaThs of length $2... | {P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (t hese stars have Gr und yvalu e 2) ;
- ${\math c al C _2^{\Box}}$: subdivide d sta rs $S$s uc h tha t ${\ma t hc a l {G} }( S) =2$ a n d$S$ c ont ains on e or three pa th s of length$ 2$ ;
- ${\ mat hcal C_3^{\B ox} }$: su bd ivi d ed st ars $S$such t h at ${\ mathcal{G }} ( S)=3$a ... | {P_2$,[$S_{2,2}$]{}$\}$ (these_stars have_Grundy value 2);
- _ ${\mathcal_C_2^{\Box}}$:_subdivided stars_$S$_such that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=2$_and $S$ contains_one or three paths_of length $2$;
-__ ${\mathcal C_3^{\Box}}$: subdivided stars $S$ such that ${\mathcal{G}}(S)=3$ and S contains one or_three_paths of_length_$2... |
than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss]). For closer galaxies, small compact areas inside the galaxies are considered as independent galaxies, so the SDSS photometry and the radius R90 are not representative of the whole galaxy. We therefore excluded from our sample all galaxies with z$<$0.04. (iii) We keep only galaxies... | than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [ @strauss ]). For closer galaxies, small compact area inside the galaxy are considered as independent galaxies, so the SDSS photometry and the spoke R90 are not representative of the whole galaxy. We therefore eject from our sample all galaxies with z$<$0.04. (iii) We keep open only galaxies ... | thwn 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strausr]). For closer galaxies, vmall dompact xreas inside the galaxies arx cobsideeed as independent galxxies, so nhe SDSS photinetry and vge radimf R90 zve noc cepresentative pf the whone galaxy. We tvefeyore excluded from our sample all gajaxies eihh z$<$0.04. (iii) We kegp onkr gamaxies... | than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss]). For small areas inside galaxies are considered SDSS and the radius are not representative the whole galaxy. We therefore excluded our sample all galaxies with z$<$0.04. (iii) We keep only galaxies with a between the fiber and model magnitudes in the r band of less than mag. of mai... | than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss]). For Closer galaXies, sMalL coMpAct aReas Inside the galaxIEs arE considered as independeNt galAxIEs, so THe sDSS pHotometRY aND The RaDiUs R90 ArE NoT reprEseNtative Of the whole GalAxY. We therefore EXcLuded from oUr sAmple all galaXieS with z$<$0.04. (IiI) We KEep onLy gAlaxiEs... | than 0.04 (Strauss et al. [@strauss ]). F orclo se r ga laxi es, small comp a ct a reas inside the galaxi es ar ec onsi d er ed as indepe n de n t ga la xi es, s o t he SD SSphotome try and th e r ad ius R90 aren ot represent ati ve of the wh ole galax y. We there for e exc ludedf rom ou r sampleal l galax i ... | than_0.04 (Strauss_et al. [@strauss]). For_closer galaxies,_small_compact areas_inside_the galaxies are_considered as independent_galaxies, so the SDSS_photometry and the_radius_R90 are not representative of the whole galaxy. We therefore excluded from our sample_all_galaxies with_z$<$0.04._(iii)_We keep only galaxies... |
discussed in the Proposed Approaches section, the two CNNs can be entirely separate, almost identical, or partially joint, leading to different performances in training as well as in application. We carry out extensive simulation studies, and show that the proposed neural model selector and parameter estimator can be ... | discussed in the Proposed Approaches section, the two CNNs can be entirely separate, about identical, or partially joint, go to different performances in education as well as in lotion. We carry out extensive pretense study, and show that the proposed neural model picker and parameter estimator can be properly trained,... | didcussed in the Proposed Xpproaches sectnin, the two CHNs can ce entirely separate, almost mdenrical, or partially joint, lexding to fifferenr pecformances in trejning as well ws iu epplication. We garry out eftensive simuldtkou studies, and show that the proposed neural mldel selector wnd karwmetsg tstimator can be ... | discussed in the Proposed Approaches section, the can entirely separate, identical, or partially in as well as application. We carry extensive simulation studies, and show that proposed neural model selector and parameter estimator can be properly trained, and the CNNs demonstrate excellent performance in test data and... | discussed in the Proposed AppRoaches secTion, tHe tWo CnNS can Be enTirely separate, ALmosT identical, or partially jOint, lEaDIng tO DiFfereNt perfoRMaNCEs iN tRaIniNg AS wEll as In aPplicatIon. We carry Out ExTensive simulATiOn studies, aNd sHow that the prOpoSed neuRaL moDEl selEctOr and ParameTEr estiMator can bE ... | discussed in the Proposed Approache s sec tio n,th e tw o CN Ns can be enti r elyseparate, almost ident ical, o r par t ia lly j oint, l e ad i n g t odi ffe re n tperfo rma nces in trainingaswe ll as in app l ic ation. Wecar ry out exten siv e simu la tio n stud ies , and showt hat th e propose dn euralm odel s... | discussed_in the_Proposed Approaches section, the_two CNNs_can_be entirely_separate,_almost identical, or_partially joint, leading_to different performances in_training as well_as_in application. We carry out extensive simulation studies, and show that the proposed neural_model_selector and_parameter_estimator_can be ... |
bf}R}}^d \times {{{\bf}R}}^d}\!\!\! \,{
f ^{\mathrm{in}}}(x,v)\;{
\mathrm{d}(x,v)}},\;\;t
\in {{{\bf}R}}_+.$$ Notice that the term $- {
\mathrm{div}_v}\{ {
f ^\varepsilon}H \star {
f ^\varepsilon}\}$ balances the momentum $$\int _{{{{\bf}R}}^{2d}}{\!\! v {
\mathrm{div}_v}\{ {
f ^\varepsilon}H \star {
f ^\varepsilon}\}\... | bf}R}}^d \times { { { \bf}R}}^d}\!\!\! \, {
f ^{\mathrm{in}}}(x, v)\; {
\mathrm{d}(x, v)}},\;\;t
\in { { { \bf}R}}_+.$$ Notice that the term $ - {
\mathrm{div}_v}\ { {
f ^\varepsilon}H \star {
f ^\varepsilon}\}$ balances the momentum $ $ \int _ { { { { \bf}R}}^{2d}}{\!\! v {
\mathrm{div}_v}\ { {
f ^\var... | bf}R}}^f \times {{{\bf}R}}^d}\!\!\! \,{
f ^{\mathrm{in}}}(x,y)\;{
\mathrm{d}(x,v)}},\;\;t
\in {{{\bf}T}}_+.$$ Botice that fhe term $- {
\mathrm{div}_v}\{ {
f ^\varepsilon}H \svar {
d ^\vartisilon}\}$ balances the mumentum $$\ijt _{{{{\bf}R}}^{2d}}{\!\! c {
\mauhrm{div}_v}\{ {
f ^\varepsmmon}H \star {
f ^\vzvepsinin}\}\... | bf}R}}^d \times {{{\bf}R}}^d}\!\!\! \,{ f ^{\mathrm{in}}}(x,v)\;{ \mathrm{d}(x,v)}},\;\;t Notice the term { \mathrm{div}_v}\{ { ^\varepsilon}\}$ the momentum $$\int v { \mathrm{div}_v}\{ f ^\varepsilon}H \star { f ^\varepsilon}\}\;{ = \int _{{{{\bf}R}}^{4d}}{\!\! h(x-x^{\prime}) (v ^{\prime}-v) { f ^\varepsilon}(t, x^\... | bf}R}}^d \times {{{\bf}R}}^d}\!\!\! \,{
f ^{\mathrm{in}}}(x,v)\;{
\mAthrm{d}(x,v)}},\;\;t
\iN {{{\bf}R}}_+.$$ NOtiCe tHaT the Term $- {
\Mathrm{div}_v}\{ {
f ^\varEPsilOn}H \star {
f ^\varepsilon}\}$ balaNces tHe MOmenTUm $$\Int _{{{{\bf}r}}^{2d}}{\!\! v {
\mathRM{dIV}_V}\{ {
f ^\vArEpSilOn}h \StAr {
f ^\vaRepSilon}\}\... | bf}R}}^d \times {{{\bf}R}} ^d}\!\!\!\,{
f ^{ \ma th rm{i n}}} (x,v)\;{
\math r m{d} (x,v)}},\;\;t
\in {{{\ bf}R} }_ + .$$N ot ice t hat the te r m $- {
\ mat hr m {d iv}_v }\{ {
f ^\ varepsilon }H\s tar {
f ^\va r ep silon}\}$bal ances the mo men tum $$ \i nt_ {{{{\ bf} R}}^{ 2d}}{\ ! \! v {
\mathrm{ di v }_v}\{ ... | bf}R}}^d \times_{{{\bf}R}}^d}\!\!\! \,{
f_^{\mathrm{in}}}(x,v)\;{
\mathrm{d}(x,v)}},\;\;t
\in {{{\bf}R}}_+.$$ Notice that_the term_$-_{
\mathrm{div}_v}\{ {
f_^\varepsilon}H_\star {
f ^\varepsilon}\}$_balances the momentum_$$\int _{{{{\bf}R}}^{2d}}{\!\! v {
\mathrm{div}_v}\{_{
f ^\varepsilon}H \star_{
f_^\varepsilon}\}\... |
-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ a.s. for $t\in[0,T]$. Hence we have $$\label{tShW}
{\widetilde{S}}(t)=\varphi(0)
\exp\left\{\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)\,d{\widehat{W}}(u)
-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ for $t\in[0,T]$. By examining the definitions of... | -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u - b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ a.s. for $ t\in[0,T]$. Hence we have $ $ \label{tShW }
{ \widetilde{S}}(t)=\varphi(0)
\exp\left\{\int_0^tg\big(S(u - b)\big)\,d{\widehat{W}}(u)
-\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u - b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ for $ t\in[0,T]$. By examining ... | -\fraf{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ a.r. for $t\in[0,T]$. Hencg qe havx $$\label{fShW}
{\wiaetilde{S}}(t)=\varphi(0)
\exp\lxft\{\ibt_0^tg\bug(S(u-b)\big)\,d{\widehat{W}}(u)
-\feac{1}{2}\iit_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\rmfht\}$$ for $t\in[0,T]$. Gn exakmning the definltions of... | -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ a.s. for $t\in[0,T]$. Hence we have \exp\left\{\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)\,d{\widehat{W}}(u) for $t\in[0,T]$. examining the definitions and (6), it is hard to see for $t \geq 0$, ${\mathcal{F}}_t^S={\mathcal{F}}_t^{{\widetilde{S}}}={\mathcal{F}}_t^{{\widehat{W}}}={\mat... | -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ A.s. for $t\in[0,T]$. HEnce wE haVe $$\lAbEl{tSHW}
{\wiDetilde{S}}(t)=\varphI(0)
\Exp\lEft\{\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)\,d{\wideHat{W}}(u)
-\FrAC{1}{2}\int_0^TG\bIg(S(u-b)\Big)^2du\riGHt\}$$ FOR $t\iN[0,T]$. by ExaMiNInG the dEfiNitions Of... | -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big( S(u-b)\big )^2du \ri ght \} $$ a .s.for $t\in[0,T] $ . He nce we have $$\label{t ShW} { \wid e ti lde{S }}(t)=\ v ar p h i(0 ) \ exp\l eft \{\int_ 0^tg\big(S (u- b) \big)\,d{\wi d eh at{W}}(u) -\fr ac {1} { 2}\in t_0 ^tg\b ig(S(u - b)\big )^2du\rig ht \ }$$ fo r $t\in[ 0 ... | -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ a.s._for $t\in[0,T]$._Hence we have $$\label{tShW}
_ {\widetilde{S}}(t)=\varphi(0)
__ __ _ \exp\left\{\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)\,d{\widehat{W}}(u)
_ _ __ -\frac{1}{2}\int_0^tg\big(S(u-b)\big)^2du\right\}$$ for $t\in[0,T]$. By_examining_the definitions_of... |
rm Be}}$ core $R^{\rm (c)}_{\rm rms}$, the rms distances between the core and $\Lambda$ particle $R^{({\rm c}-\Lambda)}_{\rm rms}$, and the rms radii of ${^9_\Lambda{\rm Be}}$ $R_{\rm rms}$ at the minimum positions are shown, together with the corresponding $\beta_\perp$ and $\beta_z$ values. The maximum squared overla... | rm Be}}$ core $ R^{\rm (c)}_{\rm rms}$, the rms distances between the core and $ \Lambda$ particle $ R^{({\rm c}-\Lambda)}_{\rm rms}$, and the rms radius of $ { ^9_\Lambda{\rm Be}}$ $ R_{\rm rms}$ at the minimal positions are shown, in concert with the corresponding $ \beta_\perp$ and $ \beta_z$ value. The maximum squa... | rm He}}$ core $R^{\rm (c)}_{\rm rms}$, the vms distances bejwwen thx core znd $\Lambaa$ particle $R^{({\rm c}-\Lambda)}_{\rm rmd}$, qnd tye rms radii of ${^9_\Lambda{\fm Be}}$ $R_{\rm rms}$ at rhe nunimum posmfions avz shosk, togztier with the cotresponding $\teta_\perp$ and $\batx_z$ values. The maximum squared overla... | rm Be}}$ core $R^{\rm (c)}_{\rm rms}$, the between core and particle $R^{({\rm c}-\Lambda)}_{\rm of Be}}$ $R_{\rm rms}$ the minimum positions shown, together with the corresponding $\beta_\perp$ $\beta_z$ values. The maximum squared overlap values of ${\cal O}_J(\beta_\perp,\beta_z)$ defined by Eq. are also shown, toge... | rm Be}}$ core $R^{\rm (c)}_{\rm rms}$, the rms diStances betWeen tHe cOre AnD $\LamBda$ pArticle $R^{({\rm c}-\LamBDa)}_{\rm Rms}$, and the rms radii of ${^9_\LamBda{\rm be}}$ $r_{\Rm rmS}$ At The miNimum poSItIONs aRe ShOwn, ToGEtHer wiTh tHe correSponding $\beTa_\pErP$ and $\beta_z$ valUEs. the maximum SquAred overla... | rm Be}}$ core $R^{\rm (c)} _{\rm rms} $, th e r msdi stan cesbetween the co r e an d $\Lambda$ particle $ R^{({ \r m c}- \ La mbda) }_{\rmr ms } $ , a nd t herm s r adiiof${^9_\L ambda{\rmBe} }$ $R_{\rm rms } $at the min imu m positionsare shown ,tog e therwit h the corre s pondin g $\beta_ \p e rp$ an d $\beta ... | rm Be}}$_core $R^{\rm_(c)}_{\rm rms}$, the rms_distances between_the_core and_$\Lambda$_particle $R^{({\rm c}-\Lambda)}_{\rm_rms}$, and the_rms radii of ${^9_\Lambda{\rm_Be}}$ $R_{\rm rms}$_at_the minimum positions are shown, together with the corresponding $\beta_\perp$ and $\beta_z$ values. The_maximum_squared overla... |
ivity curves measured at two different Bragg angles of two Si(555) circular analysers with the bending radii of 1 m and 0.5 m. The diameter and thickness of the wafers were 100 mm and 150 $\upmu$m, respectively. Further experimental details are presented in the original sources.
Compared with the previous work which w... | ivity curves measured at two different Bragg angles of two Si(555) round analyzer with the deflect radii of 1 m and 0.5 m. The diameter and thickness of the wafer were 100 mm and 150 $ \upmu$m, respectively. Further experimental details are presented in the original informant.
Compared with the previous empl... | ivihy curves measured at twu different Brayt anglxs of tso Si(555) cifcular analysers with the beidint radui of 1 m and 0.5 m. The diamdter and nhickness of uhe wafers were 100 mm and 150 $\upmu$m, reaiectireoy. Further expgrimental dedails are presangeb in the original sources.
Compared wieh the lrfvious work whych e... | ivity curves measured at two different Bragg two circular analysers the bending radii m. diameter and thickness the wafers were mm and 150 $\upmu$m, respectively. Further details are presented in the original sources. Compared with the previous work which based on the geometrical considerations and did not account for ... | ivity curves measured at two dIfferent BrAgg anGleS of TwO Si(555) cIrcuLar analysers wiTH the Bending radii of 1 m and 0.5 m. The DiameTeR And tHIcKness Of the waFErS WEre 100 Mm AnD 150 $\upMu$M, ReSpectIveLy. FurthEr experimeNtaL dEtails are preSEnTed in the orIgiNal sources.
CoMpaRed witH tHe pREviouS woRk whiCh w... | ivity curves measured at t wo differe nt Br agg an gl es o f tw o Si(555) circ u laranalysers with the ben dingra d ii o f 1 m an d 0.5 m . T h e di am et eran d t hickn ess of the wafers we re10 0 mm and 150 $\ upmu$m, re spe ctively. Fur the r expe ri men t al de tai ls ar e pres e nted i n the ori gi n al so... | ivity curves_measured at_two different Bragg angles_of two_Si(555)_circular analysers_with_the bending radii_of 1 m and_0.5 m. The diameter and_thickness of the_wafers_were 100 mm and 150 $\upmu$m, respectively. Further experimental details are presented in the original sources.
Compared_with_the previous_work_which_w... |
\label{eqn:theta_beta_2}\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\dot{\delta}_{\gamma} = -\frac{4}{3}\theta_{\gamma}-\frac{2}{3}\dot{h} + (1-\lambda) \frac{\rho_{q}}{\rho_{\gamma}}\frac{a}{\tau}(\delta_{\beta}-\delta_{\gamma})\,,
\label{eqn:deltadot_gamma_2}\end{aligned}$$
and $$\begin{aligned}
\dot{\theta}_{\gamma} = k^2 ... | \label{eqn: theta_beta_2}\end{aligned}$$
$ $ \begin{aligned }
\dot{\delta}_{\gamma } = -\frac{4}{3}\theta_{\gamma}-\frac{2}{3}\dot{h } + (1-\lambda) \frac{\rho_{q}}{\rho_{\gamma}}\frac{a}{\tau}(\delta_{\beta}-\delta_{\gamma})\, ,
\label{eqn: deltadot_gamma_2}\end{aligned}$$
and $ $ \begin{aligned }
\dot{\th... |
\labfl{eqn:theta_beta_2}\end{aligned}$$
$$\negin{aligned}
\dot{\dglra}_{\gamme} = -\frac{4}{3}\fheta_{\gamoa}-\frac{2}{3}\dot{h} + (1-\lambda) \frac{\rho_{q}}{\rio_{\ganma}}\frqc{a}{\tau}(\delta_{\beta}-\delta_{\gaoma})\,,
\label{een:deltadit_ganna_2}\end{alignxs}$$
and $$\bennn{alifked}
\doc{\tieta}_{\gamma} = k^2 ... | \label{eqn:theta_beta_2}\end{aligned}$$ $$\begin{aligned} \dot{\delta}_{\gamma} = -\frac{4}{3}\theta_{\gamma}-\frac{2}{3}\dot{h} + (1-\lambda) and \dot{\theta}_{\gamma} = \left( \frac{1}{4}\delta_{\gamma} - \nonumber &+ (1-\lambda) \frac{\rho_{q}}{\rho_{\gamma}}\frac{a}{\tau}\left(\frac{3}{4}\theta_{\beta}-\theta_{\gam... |
\label{eqn:theta_beta_2}\end{alignEd}$$
$$\begin{aliGned}
\dOt{\dEltA}_{\gAmma} = -\Frac{4}{3}\Theta_{\gamma}-\frac{2}{3}\DOt{h} + (1-\lAmbda) \frac{\rho_{q}}{\rho_{\gamma}}\fRac{a}{\tAu}(\DElta_{\BEtA}-\deltA_{\gamma})\,,
\lABeL{EQn:dElTaDot_GaMMa_2}\End{alIgnEd}$$
and $$\beGin{aligned}
\Dot{\ThEta}_{\gamma} = k^2 ... |
\label{eqn:theta_beta_2}\ end{aligne d}$$
$$ \be gi n{al igne d}
\dot{\delta } _{\g amma} = -\frac{4}{3}\t heta_ {\ g amma } -\ frac{ 2}{3}\d o t{ h } +(1 -\ lam bd a )\frac {\r ho_{q}} {\rho_{\ga mma }} \frac{a}{\ta u }( \delta_{\b eta }-\delta_{\g amm a})\,,
\ lab e l{eqn :de ltado t_gamm a _2}\en d{aligned }$ $
... |
\label{eqn:theta_beta_2}\end{aligned}$$
$$\begin{aligned}
\dot{\delta}_{\gamma} =_-\frac{4}{3}\theta_{\gamma}-\frac{2}{3}\dot{h} +_(1-\lambda) \frac{\rho_{q}}{\rho_{\gamma}}\frac{a}{\tau}(\delta_{\beta}-\delta_{\gamma})\,,
\label{eqn:deltadot_gamma_2}\end{aligned}$$
and $$\begin{aligned}
\dot{\theta}_{\gamma} =_k^2 ... |
1}{2} v_p}{\sqrt{\rho_R} -
\frac{1}{2}v_p} ).$$ The maximum values occur between the piston and the DSW: $\rho_{max} =
\rho_L = (v_p/2 + \sqrt{\rho_R})^2$, $u_{max} = u_L = v_p$.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... | 1}{2 } v_p}{\sqrt{\rho_R } -
\frac{1}{2}v_p }) .$$ The maximum values occur between the piston and the DSW: $ \rho_{max } =
\rho_L = (v_p/2 + \sqrt{\rho_R})^2 $, $ u_{max } = u_L = v_p$.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... | 1}{2} v_p}{\dqrt{\rho_R} -
\frac{1}{2}v_p} ).$$ The maximum values occur uetween the pisgon and the DSW: $\rho_{max} =
\rho_L = (v_p/2 + \sqet{\rho_R})^2$, $u_{max} = u_L = v_p$.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... | 1}{2} v_p}{\sqrt{\rho_R} - \frac{1}{2}v_p} ).$$ The maximum between piston and DSW: $\rho_{max} = $u_{max} u_L = v_p$. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... | 1}{2} v_p}{\sqrt{\rho_R} -
\frac{1}{2}v_p} ).$$ The maximuM values occUr betWeeN thE pIstoN and The DSW: $\rho_{max} =
\rhO_l = (v_p/2 + \sQrt{\rho_R})^2$, $u_{max} = u_L = v_p$.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... | 1}{2} v_p}{\sqrt{\rho_R} -
\frac {1}{2 }v_ p}). $$ T he m aximum valueso ccur between the piston an d the D S W: $ \ rh o_{ma x} =
\r h o_ L = ( v_ p/ 2 + \ s qr t{\rh o_R })^2$,$u_{max} = u_ L= v_p$.
- - -- ---------- --- ------------ --- ------ -- --- - ----- --- ----- ------ - ------ --------- -- - -----... | 1}{2} v_p}{\sqrt{\rho_R}_-
_ \frac{1}{2}v_p} ).$$_The maximum_values_occur between_the_piston and the_DSW: $\rho_{max} =
\rho_L_= (v_p/2 + \sqrt{\rho_R})^2$,_$u_{max} = u_L_=_v_p$.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------... |
g{N}\hspace{-1pt}\left( \matr{0}, \left[ \begin{array}{cc}
\matr{C}\com & \K\com(\X_\n,\X\newd)\\
\K\com(\X\newd,\X_\n) & \K\com(\X\newd,\X\newd)\\
\end{array}\hspace{-1pt}\right]\right)\hspace{-2pt}.\end{aligned}$$ The conditional distribution for the predictions ${{\fv\com}\newd}$ given the observations yields the pr... | g{N}\hspace{-1pt}\left (\matr{0 }, \left [ \begin{array}{cc }
\matr{C}\com & \K\com(\X_\n,\X\newd)\\
\K\com(\X\newd,\X_\n) & \K\com(\X\newd,\X\newd)\\
\end{array}\hspace{-1pt}\right]\right)\hspace{-2pt}.\end{aligned}$$ The conditional distribution for the predictions $ { { \fv\com}\newd}$ given the observations y... | g{N}\hdpace{-1pt}\left( \matr{0}, \left[ \benin{array}{cc}
\matr{C}\com & \K\cok(\X_\n,\X\nesd)\\
\K\com(\X\ndwd,\X_\n) & \K\com(\X\newd,\X\newd)\\
\end{arrab}\hspqce{-1pt}\eight]\right)\hspace{-2pt}.\end{auigned}$$ Thv conditiinal eistribution for tmz preslctious ${{\fv\com}\newd}$ givgn the obsereations yields tfe pr... | g{N}\hspace{-1pt}\left( \matr{0}, \left[ \begin{array}{cc} \matr{C}\com & \K\com(\X_\n,\X\newd)\\ \K\com(\X\newd,\X\newd)\\ The conditional for the predictions the distribution $$\begin{aligned} {{\fv\com}\newd}| \sim \calg{N}\left(\vect{\mu}_{{\fv\com}\newd},\matr{\Sigma}_{{\fv\com}\newd}\right),\end{aligned}$$ and ar... | g{N}\hspace{-1pt}\left( \matr{0}, \left[ \begIn{array}{cc}
\mAtr{C}\cOm & \K\Com(\x_\n,\x\newD)\\
\K\coM(\X\newd,\X_\n) & \K\com(\X\nEWd,\X\nEwd)\\
\end{array}\hspace{-1pt}\rigHt]\rigHt)\HSpacE{-2Pt}.\End{alIgned}$$ ThE CoNDItiOnAl DisTrIBuTion fOr tHe prediCtions ${{\fv\coM}\neWd}$ Given the obseRVaTions yieldS thE pr... | g{N}\hspace{-1pt}\left( \m atr{0}, \l eft[\be gin {a rray }{cc }
\matr{C}\com & \K \com(\X_\n,\X\newd)\\\K\co m( \ X\ne w d, \X_\n ) & \K\ c om ( \ X\n ew d, \X\ ne w d) \\
\e nd{ array}\ hspace{-1p t}\ ri ght]\right)\ h sp ace{-2pt}. \en d{aligned}$$ Th e cond it ion a l dis tri butio n fort he pre dictions${ { \fv\c... | g{N}\hspace{-1pt}\left( \matr{0},_\left[ \begin{array}{cc}
\matr{C}\com_& \K\com(\X_\n,\X\newd)\\
\K\com(\X\newd,\X_\n) & \K\com(\X\newd,\X\newd)\\
\end{array}\hspace{-1pt}\right]\right)\hspace{-2pt}.\end{aligned}$$_The conditional_distribution_for the_predictions_${{\fv\com}\newd}$ given the_observations yields the_pr... |
Lieberman [*Regular and Chaotic Dynamics*]{} (Springer Verlag, 1992). C. Tsallis, A.R. Plastino, W.M. Zheng, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals [**8**]{}, 885 (1997); M.L. Lyra, C. Tsallis, Phys. Rev. Lett. [**80**]{}, 53 (1998); V. Latora, M. Baranger, A. Rapisarda, C. Tsallis, Phys. Lett. A, [**273**]{} 97 (2000). A. Pere... | Lieberman [ * Regular and Chaotic Dynamics * ] { } (Springer Verlag, 1992). C. Tsallis, A.R. Plastino, W.M. Zheng, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals [ * * 8 * * ] { }, 885 (1997); M.L. Lyra, C. Tsallis, Phys. Rev. Lett. [ * * 80 * * ] { }, 53 (1998); V. Latora, M. Baranger, A. Rapisarda, C. Tsallis, Phys. Lett. A, [ * * 273... | Lifberman [*Regular and Chaouic Dynamics*]{} (Spriuter Veclag, 1992). C. Tsallis, A.R. Plastino, W.M. Zheng, Chaos, Dooitonw and Fractals [**8**]{}, 885 (1997); M.L. Lhra, C. Tsaplis, Phyw. Ret. Lett. [**80**]{}, 53 (1998); V. Latocz, M. Baranger, Z. Rapnserda, C. Tsallis, Khys. Lett. A, [**273**]{} 97 (2000). A. Pere... | Lieberman [*Regular and Chaotic Dynamics*]{} (Springer Verlag, Tsallis, Plastino, W.M. Chaos, Solitons and Lyra, Tsallis, Phys. Rev. [**80**]{}, 53 (1998); Latora, M. Baranger, A. Rapisarda, C. Phys. Lett. A, [**273**]{} 97 (2000). A. Peres, in [*Quantum Chaos, Quantum Measurement*]{} by H. A. Cerdeira, R. Ramaswamy, M... | Lieberman [*Regular and ChaotiC Dynamics*]{} (SPringEr VErlAg, 1992). c. TsaLlis, a.R. Plastino, W.M. ZhENg, ChAos, Solitons and Fractals [**8**]{}, 885 (1997); m.L. LyrA, C. tSallIS, PHys. ReV. Lett. [**80**]{}, 53 (1998); V. LAToRA, m. BaRaNgEr, A. raPIsArda, C. tsaLlis, PhyS. Lett. A, [**273**]{} 97 (2000). A. PerE... | Lieberman [*Regular and C haotic Dyn amics *]{ } ( Sp ring er V erlag, 1992).C . Ts allis, A.R. Plastino,W.M.Zh e ng,C ha os, S olitons an d Fra ct al s [ ** 8 ** ]{},885 (1997) ; M.L. Lyr a,C. Tsallis, Ph y s. Rev. Lett . [ **80**]{}, 5 3 ( 1998); V . L a tora, M. Bara nger,A . Rapi sarda, C. T s allis, Phys. ... | Lieberman_[*Regular and_Chaotic Dynamics*]{} (Springer Verlag,_1992). C._Tsallis,_A.R. Plastino,_W.M._Zheng, Chaos, Solitons_and Fractals [**8**]{},_885 (1997); M.L. Lyra,_C. Tsallis, Phys._Rev._Lett. [**80**]{}, 53 (1998); V. Latora, M. Baranger, A. Rapisarda, C. Tsallis, Phys. Lett._A,_[**273**]{} 97_(2000)._A._Pere... |
{cases}
f_i^{\varphi_i(b)-\epsilon_i(b)}(b) &
\text{if $\varphi_i(b)>\epsilon_i(b)$} \\
b & \text{if $\varphi_i(b)=\epsilon_i(b)$} \\
e_i^{\epsilon_i(b)-\varphi_i(b)}(b) &
\text{if $\varphi_i(b)<\epsilon_i(b)$}.
\end{cases}$$ It is obvious that $s_i$ is an involution.
Tensor products of crystals
----... | { cases }
f_i^{\varphi_i(b)-\epsilon_i(b)}(b) &
\text{if $ \varphi_i(b)>\epsilon_i(b)$ } \\
b & \text{if $ \varphi_i(b)=\epsilon_i(b)$ } \\
e_i^{\epsilon_i(b)-\varphi_i(b)}(b) &
\text{if $ \varphi_i(b)<\epsilon_i(b)$ }.
\end{cases}$$ It is obvious that $ s_i$ is an involution.
Tensor prod... | {casfs}
f_i^{\varphi_i(b)-\epsilon_i(b)}(b) &
\text{if $\varkhu_i(b)>\epsmlon_i(b)$} \\
b & \texg{if $\varphi_i(b)=\epsilon_i(b)$} \\
e_i^{\epdioon_i(b)-\carphi_i(b)}(b) &
\text{if $\vxrphi_i(b)<\epdilon_i(b)$}.
\eid{cases}$$ It is obtjous that $s_i$ jd an mnvolution.
Tensot products ox crystals
----... | {cases} f_i^{\varphi_i(b)-\epsilon_i(b)}(b) & \text{if $\varphi_i(b)>\epsilon_i(b)$} \\ b $\varphi_i(b)=\epsilon_i(b)$} e_i^{\epsilon_i(b)-\varphi_i(b)}(b) & $\varphi_i(b)<\epsilon_i(b)$}. \end{cases}$$ It an Tensor products of --------------------------- Given two $B$ and $B'$, there is also crystal obtained by taking... | {cases}
f_i^{\varphi_i(b)-\epsilon_i(b)}(b) &
\Text{if $\varpHi_i(b)>\ePsiLon_I(b)$} \\
B & \texT{if $\vArphi_i(b)=\epsilon_I(B)$} \\
e_i^{\ePsilon_i(b)-\varphi_i(b)}(b) &
\text{iF $\varpHi_I(B)<\epsILoN_i(b)$}.
\enD{cases}$$ IT Is OBVioUs ThAt $s_I$ iS An InvolUtiOn.
TensoR products oF crYsTals
----... | {cases}
f_i^{\varphi_i(b )-\epsilon _i(b) }(b ) & \ text {if $\varphi_i ( b)>\ epsilon_i(b)$} \\
b& \te xt { if $ \ va rphi_ i(b)=\e p si l o n_i (b )$ } \ \ e _i^{\ eps ilon_i( b)-\varphi _i( b) }(b) &
\ t ex t{if $\var phi _i(b)<\epsil on_ i(b)$} . \end{ cas es}$$ It is obviou s that $s _i $ is an invo... | {cases}
_f_i^{\varphi_i(b)-\epsilon_i(b)}(b) &_
\text{if_$\varphi_i(b)>\epsilon_i(b)$} \\
__b &_\text{if_$\varphi_i(b)=\epsilon_i(b)$} \\
_e_i^{\epsilon_i(b)-\varphi_i(b)}(b) &
_ \text{if $\varphi_i(b)<\epsilon_i(b)$}.
_ _\end{cases}$$_It is obvious that $s_i$ is an involution.
Tensor products of crystals
----... |
1)!}
\sum_{l=0}^{j}\frac{(-1)^{l}j!}{(j-l)!}
\sum_{r=0}^{l}\frac{z^{l-r}}{(l-r)!}\frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8pt]
& \quad = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j}\sideset{_{n-1}}{_j}S}{(n-1)!}
(1-z-u)^{j}\\[8pt]
& \quad = \binom{z+u-1}{n-1}.
\end{aligned}$$]{}
On the other hand, the generating function of the... | 1)! }
\sum_{l=0}^{j}\frac{(-1)^{l}j!}{(j - l)! }
\sum_{r=0}^{l}\frac{z^{l - r}}{(l - r)!}\frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8pt ]
& \quad = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j}\sideset{_{n-1}}{_j}S}{(n-1)! }
(1 - z - u)^{j}\\[8pt ]
& \quad = \binom{z+u-1}{n-1 }.
\end{aligned}$$ ] { }
On the other han... | 1)!}
\sum_{l=0}^{j}\frac{(-1)^{l}j!}{(j-l)!}
\sum_{r=0}^{l}\nrac{z^{l-r}}{(l-r)!}\frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8kt]
& \qnad = \suj_{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j}\rideset{_{n-1}}{_j}S}{(n-1)!}
(1-z-u)^{j}\\[8pt]
& \qyad = \vinom{z+u-1}{n-1}.
\end{aligned}$$]{}
On ghe other hand, thw geierating functioi of the... | 1)!} \sum_{l=0}^{j}\frac{(-1)^{l}j!}{(j-l)!} \sum_{r=0}^{l}\frac{z^{l-r}}{(l-r)!}\frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8pt] & \quad = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j}\sideset{_{n-1}}{_j}S}{(n-1)!} \quad \binom{z+u-1}{n-1}. \end{aligned}$$]{} the other hand, right side is [ & \sum_{j=0}^{n-1} G_{n,j}(z) \frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8pt] & \quad = \su... | 1)!}
\sum_{l=0}^{j}\frac{(-1)^{l}j!}{(j-l)!}
\sum_{r=0}^{l}\frac{z^{l-r}}{(L-r)!}\frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8pT]
& \quad = \Sum_{J=0}^{n-1}\fRaC{(-1)^{j}\siDeseT{_{n-1}}{_j}S}{(n-1)!}
(1-z-u)^{j}\\[8pt]
& \quad = \BInom{Z+u-1}{n-1}.
\end{aligned}$$]{}
On the otheR hand, ThE GeneRAtIng fuNction oF ThE... | 1)!}
\sum_{l=0}^{j}\f rac{(-1)^{ l}j!} {(j -l) !}
\su m_{r=0}^{l}\fr a c{z^ {l-r}}{(l-r)!}\frac{u^ {r}}{ r! } \\[8 p t]
& \quad =\ s um_ {j =0 }^{ n- 1 }\ frac{ (-1 )^{j}\s ideset{_{n -1} }{ _j}S}{(n-1)! }
(1- z-u )^{j}\\[8pt]
& \q ua d = \bino m{z +u-1} {n-1}. \end{ aligned}$ $] { }
Ont he o... | 1)!}
_ _ \sum_{l=0}^{j}\frac{(-1)^{l}j!}{(j-l)!}
_ \sum_{r=0}^{l}\frac{z^{l-r}}{(l-r)!}\frac{u^{r}}{r!}\\[8pt]
__ _&_\quad = \sum_{j=0}^{n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j}\sideset{_{n-1}}{_j}S}{(n-1)!}
_ _ _(1-z-u)^{j}\\[8pt]
__& \quad = \binom{z+u-1}{n-1}.
\end{aligned}$$]{}
On the other hand, the generating function of the... |
been proposed to measure the Majorana fermions [@fu2009a; @tanaka2009a; @fu2009b; @akhmerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; @chung2011]. Here, we base our discussion on a recent proposal studying the CMEM backscattering [@chung2011]. The basic setup is shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisting of a magnetic TI in proximity with... | been proposed to measure the Majorana fermions [ @fu2009a; @tanaka2009a; @fu2009b; @akhmerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; @chung2011 ]. Here, we base our discussion on a late marriage proposal study the CMEM backscattering [ @chung2011 ]. The basic setup is shown in Fig. \[fig1\ ], consist of a magnetic TI in pro... | befn proposed to measure tme Majorana fermnins [@fu2009a; @tanakz2009a; @fu2009b; @ayhmerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; @chung2011]. Hece, ww bast our discussion on a recent proposao stndying the CMEM uzckscatbzring [@dmung2011]. Chx basic setup ix shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisdivg of a magnetic TI in proximity with... | been proposed to measure the Majorana fermions @fu2009b; @law2009; @lutchyn2010; Here, we base proposal the CMEM backscattering The basic setup shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisting of magnetic TI in proximity with a grounded top SC layer in region II two current leads at the corners. When the magnetic domains of magnetic... | been proposed to measure the MAjorana ferMions [@Fu2009a; @TanAkA2009a; @fu2009B; @akhMerov2009; @law2009; @lutchyN2010; @ChunG2011]. Here, we base our discussiOn on a ReCEnt pROpOsal sTudying THe cmeM bAcKsCatTeRInG [@chunG2011]. ThE basic sEtup is showN in fiG. \[fig1\], consistiNG oF a magnetic tI iN proximity wiTh... | been proposed to measurethe Majora na fe rmi ons [ @fu2 009a ; @tanaka2009a ; @fu 2009b; @akhmerov2009;@law2 00 9 ; @l u tc hyn20 10; @ch u ng 2 0 11] .He re, w e b ase o urdiscuss ion on a r ece nt proposal st u dy ing the CM EMbackscatteri ng[@chun g2 011 ] . The ba sic s etup i s shown in Fig.\[ f ig1\], co... | been_proposed to_measure the Majorana fermions [@fu2009a;_@tanaka2009a; @fu2009b;_@akhmerov2009;_@law2009; @lutchyn2010;_@chung2011]._Here, we base_our discussion on_a recent proposal studying_the CMEM backscattering [@chung2011]._The_basic setup is shown in Fig. \[fig1\], consisting of a magnetic TI in proximity with... |
three datasets as illustration. From the figure, we can see that the optimal numbers of topics and latent factors are varied across different datasets. In general, more latent factors usually lead to better performance, while the optimal number of latent topics is dependent on the reviews of different datasets. This a... | three datasets as illustration. From the figure, we can see that the optimal number of subject and latent factors are varied across different datasets. In general, more latent component usually lead to good performance, while the optimal act of latent topics is dependent on the follow-up of different datasets. This als... | thgee datasets as illustrauion. From the figorw, we cen see fhat the optimal numbers of topics aid lqtent factors are varied acfoss diffvrent datqsetw. In general, more latent rwctoxs usually lead jo better pesformance, whila ghz optimal number of latent topics is dependrnh on the reviers og difrvrtnt datasets. This a... | three datasets as illustration. From the figure, see the optimal of topics and different In general, more factors usually lead better performance, while the optimal number latent topics is dependent on the reviews of different datasets. This also reveals setting \#factors and \#topics to be the same may not be optimal.... | three datasets as illustratiOn. From the fIgure, We cAn sEe That The oPtimal numbers oF TopiCs and latent factors are vAried AcROss dIFfErent DatasetS. in GENerAl, MoRe lAtENt FactoRs uSually lEad to betteR peRfOrmance, while THe Optimal numBer Of latent topiCs iS depenDeNt oN The reVieWs of dIffereNT datasEts. This a... | three datasets as illustr ation. Fro m the fi gur e, wecansee that the o p tima l numbers of topics an d lat en t fac t or s are varied ac r o ssdi ff ere nt da taset s.In gene ral, morelat en t factors us u al ly lead to be tter perform anc e, whi le th e opti mal numb er ofl atenttopics is d e penden t on ... | three_datasets as_illustration. From the figure,_we can_see_that the_optimal_numbers of topics_and latent factors_are varied across different_datasets. In general,_more_latent factors usually lead to better performance, while the optimal number of latent topics_is_dependent on_the_reviews_of different datasets. This a... |
N=40$ and (5) $N=80$.
Figure 3. The conduction band vs. the chain number $N$ for a multi-chain system with chain lengths $N_\alpha=5000, \alpha= 1, 2,...,N$. A conduction band is defined as being non-zero at the energy values where the corresponding transmission coefficient is higher than 0.1.
Figure 4. The conductan... | N=40 $ and (5) $ N=80$.
Figure 3. The conduction band vs. the chain number $ N$ for a multi - chain arrangement with range lengths $ N_\alpha=5000, \alpha= 1, 2,... ,N$. A conduction band is define as being non - zero at the department of energy values where the corresponding transmission coefficient is high than 0.... | N=40$ ajd (5) $N=80$.
Figure 3. The conductlon band vs. the eyain nnmber $N$ for a mjlti-chain system with chain pebgths $N_\alpha=5000, \alpha= 1, 2,...,N$. A conauction bwnd is dwfintd as being non-zeck at thc enedny vannes where the cprresponditg transmissiot zozfficient is higher than 0.1.
Figure 4. The conducyaj... | N=40$ and (5) $N=80$. Figure 3. The vs. chain number for a multi-chain \alpha= 2,...,N$. A conduction is defined as non-zero at the energy values where corresponding transmission coefficient is higher than 0.1. Figure 4. The conductance $\sigma(E)$ as function of the number of chains $N$ for a system with equal chains ... | N=40$ and (5) $N=80$.
Figure 3. The conduction bAnd vs. the chAin nuMbeR $N$ fOr A mulTi-chAin system with cHAin lEngths $N_\alpha=5000, \alpha= 1, 2,...,N$. A conDuctiOn BAnd iS DeFined As being NOn-ZERo aT tHe EneRgY VaLues wHerE the corResponding TraNsMission coeffICiEnt is higheR thAn 0.1.
Figure 4. The cOndUctan... | N=40$ and (5) $N=80$.
Fig ure 3. The cond uct ion b andvs.the chain numb e r $N $ for a multi-chain sy stemwi t h ch a in leng ths $N_ \ al p h a=5 00 0, \a lp h a= 1, 2 ,.. .,N$. A conductio n b an d is defined as being non -ze ro at the en erg y valu es wh e re th e c orres pondin g trans mission c oe f fic... | N=40$ and_(5) $N=80$.
Figure_3. The conduction band_vs. the_chain_number $N$_for_a multi-chain system_with chain lengths_$N_\alpha=5000, \alpha= 1, 2,...,N$._A conduction band_is_defined as being non-zero at the energy values where the corresponding transmission coefficient is_higher_than 0.1.
Figure_4._The_conductan... |
2}},\ast)}$]{}]{}. We show that the remaining groups vanish over [$\mathbf{Q}$]{} using the induction hypothesis and the exact sequence $${\tilde{H}}_i({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrightarrow
{\tilde{H}}_i({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrightarrow
{\tilde{H}... | 2}},\ast)}$ ] { } ] { }. We show that the remaining groups vanish over [ $ \mathbf{Q}$ ] { } use the evocation hypothesis and the exact sequence $ $ { \tilde{H}}_i({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrightarrow
{ \tilde{H}}_i({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrigh... | 2}},\ast)}$]{}]{}. We show that the remainlng groups vanisk over [$\kathbf{S}$]{} using tfe induction hypothesis and vhe wxact sequence $${\tilde{H}}_i({{\ensurdmath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\vnsurematy{S^2}},\asu)}}}})\longrightarrow
{\tilde{H}}_i({{\ensmxematg{\cxp_{k}\!{({\eusnremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longtightarrow
{\tinde{H}... | 2}},\ast)}$]{}]{}. We show that the remaining groups [$\mathbf{Q}$]{} the induction and the exact co-efficients Since the outer are zero for 2k-5$ the middle group is too. now prove the results for [[$\exp_{k}\!{{\ensuremath{S^2}}}$]{}]{}, using the results just proved, Lemma \[samehomology.lem\], the long exact sequen... | 2}},\ast)}$]{}]{}. We show that the remaining Groups vaniSh oveR [$\maThbF{Q}$]{} UsinG the Induction hypotHEsis And the exact sequence $${\tilDe{H}}_i({{\eNsURemaTH{\eXp_{k-1}\!{({\enSurematH{s^2}},\aST)}}}})\LonGrIgHtaRrOW
{\tIlde{H}}_I({{\enSurematH{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensurEmaTh{s^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrighTArRow
{\tilde{H}... | 2}},\ast)}$]{}]{}. We show that theremai nin g g ro upsvani sh over [$\mat h bf{Q }$]{} using the induct ion h yp o thes i sand t he exac t s e q uen ce $ ${\ ti l de {H}}_ i({ {\ensur emath{\exp _{k -1 }\!{({\ensur e ma th{S^2}},\ ast )}}}})\longr igh tarrow
{ \ti l de{H} }_i ({{\e nsurem a th{\ex p_{k}\!{( {\ e n... | 2}},\ast)}$]{}]{}. We_show that_the remaining groups vanish_over [$\mathbf{Q}$]{} using_the_induction hypothesis_and_the exact sequence_$${\tilde{H}}_i({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k-1}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrightarrow
{\tilde{H}}_i({{\ensuremath{\exp_{k}\!{({\ensuremath{S^2}},\ast)}}}})\longrightarrow
{\tilde{H}... |
In practice one can live with fewer event pairs for event mixing, by replacing in (\[36\]) the number $N_{\rm ev}$ by a much smaller number $N'_{\rm
ev}$. As long as $N'_{\rm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can still ensure that the contribution of the denominator to the statistical error of the final correla... | In practice one can live with fewer event pair for consequence mixing, by replacing in (\[36\ ]) the numeral $ N_{\rm ev}$ by a a lot smaller number $ N'_{\rm
ev}$. As long as $ N'_{\rm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can however ensure that the contribution of the denominator to the statistical error of the... | In practice one can live wlth fewer event kaurs foc event mixing, cy replacing in (\[36\]) the number $I_{\rm wv}$ by a much smaller number $N'_{\rm
ev}$. Ws long qs $N'_{\cm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\cj ev}$ onc can dtiln ensure that tme contribudion of the detooiuator to the statistical error of thq final clrrela... | In practice one can live with fewer for mixing, by in (\[36\]) the much number $N'_{\rm ev}$. long as $N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can ensure that the contribution of the denominator to the statistical error of the correlation function is negligible [@Comm2]. The correlator $C^{II}$ differs from $C^{I}$ only by ... | In practice one can live with fEwer event pAirs fOr eVenT mIxinG, by rEplacing in (\[36\]) the nUMber $n_{\rm ev}$ by a much smaller numBer $N'_{\rM
eV}$. as loNG aS $N'_{\rm eV}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gG n_{\rM EV}$ onE cAn StiLl ENsUre thAt tHe contrIbution of tHe dEnOminator to thE StAtistical eRroR of the final cOrrEla... | In practice one can livewith fewer even t p air sforeven t mixing, by r e plac ing in (\[36\]) the nu mber$N _ {\rm ev }$ by a much sm a l ler n um ber $ N '_ {\rm e v}$. As long as $ N'_ {\ rm ev}(N'_{\ r mev}-1) \gg N_ {\rm ev}$ on e c an sti ll en s ure t hat thecontri b utionof the de no m inator to thes ... | In_practice one_can live with fewer_event pairs_for_event mixing,_by_replacing in (\[36\])_the number $N_{\rm_ev}$ by a much_smaller number $N'_{\rm
__ev}$. As long as $N'_{\rm ev}(N'_{\rm ev}-1) \gg N_{\rm ev}$ one can still ensure_that_the contribution_of_the_denominator to the statistical error_of the final correla... |
d+1}{d+1} + \dots + \binom{d-s+2}{d-s+2}=s$$ as claimed.
\[delta max not imply I max\] In practice, it usually is the case that $\Delta h_Z$ having maximal growth from degree $d$ to degree $d+1$ does [*not*]{} imply that $h_Z$ itself has maximal growth from degree $d$ to degree $d+1$. If it did, Gotzmann’s results (Th... | d+1}{d+1 } + \dots + \binom{d - s+2}{d - s+2}=s$$ as claimed.
\[delta max not imply I max\ ] In practice, it usually is the subject that $ \Delta h_Z$ have maximal growth from degree $ d$ to degree $ d+1 $ does [ * not * ] { } imply that $ h_Z$ itself have maximal growth from degree $ d$ to degree $ d+1$. If it dres... | d+1}{d+1} + \dots + \binom{d-s+2}{d-s+2}=s$$ as clalmed.
\[delta max noj umply M max\] Ih practize, it usually is the case thet $\Dwlta y_Z$ having maximal growgh from dvgree $d$ ti dejree $d+1$ does [*not*]{} mjply that $h_Z$ jbself ias maximal groeth from dagree $d$ to degsed $b+1$. If it did, Gotzmann’s results (Th... | d+1}{d+1} + \dots + \binom{d-s+2}{d-s+2}=s$$ as claimed. not I max\] practice, it usually h_Z$ maximal growth from $d$ to degree does [*not*]{} imply that $h_Z$ itself maximal growth from degree $d$ to degree $d+1$. If it did, Gotzmann’s results \[gotzmann persistence\] and Remark \[interpret max gr\]) would immediatel... | d+1}{d+1} + \dots + \binom{d-s+2}{d-s+2}=s$$ as claimed.
\[Delta max noT implY I mAx\] IN pRactIce, iT usually is the cASe thAt $\Delta h_Z$ having maximal GrowtH fROm deGReE $d$ to dEgree $d+1$ dOEs [*NOT*]{} imPlY tHat $H_Z$ ITsElf haS maXimal grOwth from deGreE $d$ To degree $d+1$. If iT DiD, Gotzmann’s ResUlts (Th... | d+1}{d+1} + \dots + \binom {d-s+2}{d- s+2}= s$$ as c laim ed.
\[delta max n o t im ply I max\] In practic e, it u s uall y i s the case t h at $ \De lt ah_Z $h av ing m axi mal gro wth from d egr ee $d$ to degr e e$d+1$ does [* not*]{} impl y t hat $h _Z $ i t selfhas maxi mal gr o wth fr om degree $ d $ to d ... | d+1}{d+1} +_\dots +_\binom{d-s+2}{d-s+2}=s$$ as claimed.
\[delta max_not imply_I_max\] In_practice,_it usually is_the case that_$\Delta h_Z$ having maximal_growth from degree_$d$_to degree $d+1$ does [*not*]{} imply that $h_Z$ itself has maximal growth from degree_$d$_to degree_$d+1$._If_it did, Gotzmann’s results (Th... |
inherent problem [@Dubray+12], the required computational cost is prohibitive. The microscopic approach, at the present time, is therefore best suited for studies of specific nuclei, but is not adequate for large-scale, global studies of fission yields and their trends across the chart of nuclides. A recent review cov... | inherent problem [ @Dubray+12 ], the required computational cost is prohibitive. The microscopic overture, at the present meter, is therefore best suited for study of specific nuclei, but is not adequate for large - plate, global studies of fission yields and their tendency across the chart of nuclides. A recent review... | injerent problem [@Dubray+12], tht required computcrional cost js prohicitive. The microscopic approech, qt tht present time, is tferefore hest suired hor studies of s'scific kbclei, nut iv not adequate nor large-scdle, global stugids of fission yields and their trends across tje chart of nuslidts. W redvnu review cov... | inherent problem [@Dubray+12], the required computational cost The approach, at present time, is of nuclei, but is adequate for large-scale, studies of fission yields and their across the chart of nuclides. A recent review covering the progress of this can be found in Ref. [@Schunck+16]. ![\[fig:schema\] A schematic il... | inherent problem [@Dubray+12], the rEquired comPutatIonAl cOsT is pRohiBitive. The microSCopiC approach, at the present tIme, is ThERefoRE bEst suIted for STuDIEs oF sPeCifIc NUcLei, buT is Not adeqUate for larGe-sCaLe, global studIEs Of fission yIelDs and their trEndS acrosS tHe cHArt of NucLides. a recenT Review Cov... | inherent problem [@Dubray +12], therequi red co mp utat iona l cost is proh i biti ve. The microscopic ap proac h, at t h eprese nt time , i s the re fo rebe s tsuite d f or stud ies of spe cif ic nuclei, but is not adequ ate for large-s cal e, glo ba l s t udies of fiss ion yi e lds an d their t re n ds acr o ... | inherent_problem [@Dubray+12],_the required computational cost_is prohibitive._The_microscopic approach,_at_the present time,_is therefore best_suited for studies of_specific nuclei, but_is_not adequate for large-scale, global studies of fission yields and their trends across the_chart_of nuclides._A_recent_review cov... |
00000%"}
In the most violent collisions, quark-gluon plasma is formed and the emerging hadrons are created via coalescence process. For quarkonia it is the regeneration that dominates the production at high energies. Different from the light hadrons which are produced at the hadronization surface determined by $T({\bf... | 00000% " }
In the most violent collisions, quark - gluon plasma is formed and the emerge hadron are created via coalescence process. For quarkonia it is the positive feedback that dominate the production at high energy. unlike from the light hadrons which are produced at the hadronization surface determined by $ T({... | 00000%"}
In hhe most violent collisiuns, quark-gluon klqsma iv formsd and tfe emerging hadrons are creaved cia cialescence process. For quarkoniw it is rhe cegeneration thav dominabzs ths proburtion at high ekergies. Difxerent from tha uiyht hadrons which are produced at thq hadromixation surface dettrmyned by $T({\bf... | 00000%"} In the most violent collisions, quark-gluon formed the emerging are created via is regeneration that dominates production at high Different from the light hadrons which produced at the hadronization surface determined by $T({\bf x},t)=T_c$, the quarkonium regeneration happens in the parton phase. The fraction ... | 00000%"}
In the most violent collisionS, quark-gluoN plasMa iS foRmEd anD the Emerging hadronS Are cReated via coalescence prOcess. foR QuarKOnIa it iS the regENeRATioN tHaT doMiNAtEs the ProDuction At high enerGieS. DIfferent from THe Light hadroNs wHich are produCed At the hAdRonIZatioN suRface DetermINed by $T({\Bf... | 00000%"}
In the most viol ent collis ions, qu ark -g luon pla sma is formeda nd t he emerging hadrons ar e cre at e d vi a c oales cence p r oc e s s.Fo rqua rk o ni a itisthe reg enerationtha tdominates th e p roductionathigh energie s.Differ en t f r om th e l ighthadron s which are prod uc e d at t h e hadro ... | 00000%"}
In the_most violent_collisions, quark-gluon plasma is_formed and_the_emerging hadrons_are_created via coalescence_process. For quarkonia_it is the regeneration_that dominates the_production_at high energies. Different from the light hadrons which are produced at the hadronization_surface_determined by_$T({\bf... |
Acta Arith. **165** (2014), no. 2, 141–179.
[to3em]{}, *Explicit estimates for the number of rational points of singular complete intersections over a finite field*, J. Number Theory **158** (2016), no. 2, 54–72.
M. Merca, *A note on the determinant of a [Toeplitz–Hessenberg]{} matrix*, Spec. Matrices **1** (2013), ... | Acta Arith. * * 165 * * (2014), no. 2, 141–179.
[ to3em ] { }, * Explicit estimates for the number of rational period of remarkable complete intersections over a finite field *, J. Number Theory * * 158 * * (2016), no. 2, 54–72.
M. Merca, * A eminence on the determinant of a [ Toeplitz – Hessenberg ] { } ma... | Acha Arith. **165** (2014), no. 2, 141–179.
[to3em]{}, *Expligit estimates fot rhe nukber or rationxl points of singular compleve ibterstbtions over a finite wield*, J. Nlmber Theiry **158** (2016), no. 2, 54–72.
M. Merca, *A note on the fetexmmnant of a [Toepkitz–Hessenterg]{} matrix*, Spac. Mctrices **1** (2013), ... | Acta Arith. **165** (2014), no. 2, 141–179. estimates the number rational points of finite J. Number Theory (2016), no. 2, M. Merca, *A note on the of a [Toeplitz–Hessenberg]{} matrix*, Spec. Matrices **1** (2013), 10–16. T. Muir, *The theory determinants in the historical order of development*, Dover Publications Inc.... | Acta Arith. **165** (2014), no. 2, 141–179.
[to3em]{}, *Explicit esTimates for The nuMbeR of RaTionAl poInts of singular COmplEte intersections over a fInite FiELd*, J. NUMbEr TheOry **158** (2016), no. 2, 54–72.
M. MERcA, *a NotE oN tHe dEtERmInant Of a [toeplitZ–HessenberG]{} maTrIx*, Spec. MatricES **1** (2013), ... | Acta Arith. **165** (2014 ), no. 2,141–1 79.
[ to 3em] {},*Explicit esti m ates for the number of rat ional p o ints of sing ular co m pl e t e i nt er sec ti o ns over afinitefield*, J. Nu mb er Theory ** 1 58 ** (2016), no . 2, 54–72.
M. Merca ,*An ote o n t he de termin a nt ofa [Toepli tz – Hessen b erg]... | Acta_Arith. **165**_(2014), no. 2, 141–179.
[to3em]{}, *Explicit_estimates for_the_number of_rational_points of singular_complete intersections over_a finite field*, J._Number Theory **158**_(2016),_no. 2, 54–72.
M. Merca, *A note on the determinant of a [Toeplitz–Hessenberg]{} matrix*, Spec. Matrices **1**_(2013),_... |
s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\log (2\pi ),$$ and for the leading term $${M_1} = \mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s} = \sigma_{1 - 1/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ The fluctuaring term co... | s } = \sigma_1^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta) } (m)\log (2\pi), $ $ and for the leading term $ $ { M_1 } = \mathop { \operatorname{res } } \limits_{s = 1 } \sigma_{1 - s/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)\frac{{\zeta' } } { \zeta } (s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s } = \sigma_{1 - 1/\beta } ^{(\beta) } (m)x.$... | s} = \digma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\log (2\pi ),$$ end for the leaaing term $${M_1} = \mathop {\operatoriame{ees} }\lumits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\ceta )}(m)\frab{{\zeta '}}{\zetq }(s)\fcac{{{x^s}}}{s} = \sigma_{1 - 1/\bxfa }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ Ths fluetnaring term co... | s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = (2\pi and for leading term $${M_1} 1} - s/\beta }^{(\beta '}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s} = - 1/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ The fluctuaring coming from the non-trivial zeros yields $${M_\rho } = \sum_\rho {\mathop {\operatorname{res} }\limits_{s \rho } \sigma_{1 - ... | s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta '}}{\zeta }(0) = \siGma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\loG (2\pi ),$$ anD foR thE lEadiNg teRm $${M_1} = \mathop {\operaTOrnaMe{res} }\limits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1 - s/\beta }^{(\Beta )}(m)\FrAC{{\zetA '}}{\ZeTa }(s)\frAc{{{x^s}}}{s} = \siGMa_{1 - 1/\BETa }^{(\bEtA )}(m)X.$$ ThE fLUcTuariNg tErm co... | s} = \sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m )\frac{{\z eta ' }}{ \ze ta }(0 ) =\sigma_1^{(\be t a )} (m)\log (2\pi ),$$ and forth e lea d in g ter m $${M_ 1 }= \ma th op {\ op e ra torna me{ res} }\ limits_{s= 1 }\sigma_{1 -s /\ beta }^{(\ bet a )}(m)\frac {{\ zeta ' }} {\z e ta }( s)\ frac{ {{x^s} } }{s} = \sigma_{ 1- 1/\be t a ... | s} =_\sigma_1^{(\beta )}(m)\frac{{\zeta_'}}{\zeta }(0) = \sigma_1^{(\beta_)}(m)\log (2\pi_),$$_and for_the_leading term $${M_1}_= \mathop {\operatorname{res}_}\limits_{s = 1} \sigma_{1_- s/\beta }^{(\beta_)}(m)\frac{{\zeta_'}}{\zeta }(s)\frac{{{x^s}}}{s} = \sigma_{1 - 1/\beta }^{(\beta )}(m)x.$$ The fluctuaring term co... |
y\vert \leq 1})\nu(dy)\Big)\bigg),$$ where $b,\sigma\in {\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}$ and $\nu$ is a measure on ${\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}$ satisfying $$\nu(\{0\})=0 \textnormal{ and } \int_{{\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}}(|y|^2\wedge 1)\nu(dy)<\infty.$$ In the sequel we shall refer to $(b,\sigma^2,\nu)$ as the characteris... | y\vert \leq 1})\nu(dy)\Big)\bigg),$$ where $ b,\sigma\in { \ensuremath { \mathbb{R}}}$ and $ \nu$ is a measure on $ { \ensuremath { \mathbb{R}}}$ satisfying $ $ \nu(\{0\})=0 \textnormal { and } \int_{{\ensuremath { \mathbb{R}}}}(|y|^2\wedge 1)\nu(dy)<\infty.$$ In the sequel we shall refer to $ (b,\sigma^2,\nu)$ as the ... | y\vfrt \leq 1})\nu(dy)\Big)\bigg),$$ whert $b,\sigma\in {\ensuremath {\mavhbb{R}}}$ ahd $\nu$ is a measure on ${\ensuremath {\matibb{R}}}$ satiwfying $$\nu(\{0\})=0 \textnormal{ avd } \int_{{\enduremath {\matibb{R}}}}(|y|^2\wedge 1)\nu(dy)<\iirty.$$ In bke sesmel wz whall refer to $(b,\sigma^2,\nu)$ ds the charactarks... | y\vert \leq 1})\nu(dy)\Big)\bigg),$$ where $b,\sigma\in {\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}$ is measure on {\mathbb{R}}}$ satisfying $$\nu(\{0\})=0 1)\nu(dy)<\infty.$$ the sequel we refer to $(b,\sigma^2,\nu)$ the characteristic triplet of the process and $\nu$ will be called the *Lévy measure*. This data characterizes uniquely... | y\vert \leq 1})\nu(dy)\Big)\bigg),$$ where $b,\Sigma\in {\ensUremaTh {\mAthBb{r}}}$ and $\Nu$ is A measure on ${\ensuREmatH {\mathbb{R}}}$ satisfying $$\nu(\{0\})=0 \teXtnorMaL{ And } \iNT_{{\eNsureMath {\matHBb{r}}}}(|Y|^2\WedGe 1)\Nu(Dy)<\iNfTY.$$ IN the sEquEl we shaLl refer to $(b,\SigMa^2,\Nu)$ as the charaCTeRis... | y\vert \leq 1})\nu(dy)\Bi g)\bigg),$ $ whe re$b, \s igma \in{\ensuremath { \ math bb{R}}}$ and $\nu$ isa mea su r e on ${ \ensu remath{ \m a t hbb {R }} }$sa t is fying $$ \nu(\{0 \})=0 \tex tno rm al{ and } \i n t_ {{\ensurem ath {\mathbb{R} }}} (|y|^2 \w edg e 1)\n u(d y)<\i nfty.$ $ In th e sequelwe shallr efer... | y\vert_\leq 1})\nu(dy)\Big)\bigg),$$_where $b,\sigma\in {\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}$_and $\nu$_is_a measure_on_${\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}$ satisfying_$$\nu(\{0\})=0 \textnormal{ and_} \int_{{\ensuremath {\mathbb{R}}}}(|y|^2\wedge 1)\nu(dy)<\infty.$$_In the sequel_we_shall refer to $(b,\sigma^2,\nu)$ as the characteris... |
%"}
Historical use of Strömgren photometry methods indeed has been for the purpose of determining stellar parameters for early-type stars. Recent applications include work by @nieva2013 [@dallemese2012; @onehag2009; @allende1999]. An advantage over more traditional color-magnitude diagram techniques [@nielsen2013; @de... | % " }
Historical use of Strömgren photometry methods indeed has been for the purpose of determine leading parameters for early - type star. late applications include work by @nieva2013 [ @dallemese2012; @onehag2009; @allende1999 ]. An advantage over more traditional semblance - magnitude diagram techniques [ @nielse... | %"}
Hishorical use of Strömgren khotometry methods indeev has bsen for ghe purpose of determining svellqr paeameters for early-type stars. Rebent applucatmons include work by @nieyc2013 [@dalmcmese2012; @inehag2009; @allende1999]. An advantdge over more drxdntional color-magnitude diagram technyques [@noepsen2013; @de... | %"} Historical use of Strömgren photometry methods been the purpose determining stellar parameters include by @nieva2013 [@dallemese2012; @allende1999]. An advantage more traditional color-magnitude diagram techniques [@nielsen2013; is that distance knowledge is not required, so the distance-age degeneracy is removed. ... | %"}
Historical use of Strömgren pHotometry mEthodS inDeeD hAs beEn foR the purpose of dETermIning stellar parameters For eaRlY-Type STaRs. RecEnt applICaTIOns InClUde WoRK bY @nievA2013 [@daLlemese2012; @Onehag2009; @alleNde1999]. an Advantage oveR MoRe traditioNal Color-magnituDe dIagram TeChnIQues [@nIelSen2013; @de... | %"}
Historical use of Str ömgren pho tomet rymet ho ds i ndee d has been for thepurpose of determining stel la r par a me tersfor ear l y- t y pest ar s.Re c en t app lic ationsinclude wo rkby @nieva2013[ @d allemese20 12; @onehag2009 ; @ allend e1 999 ] . Anadv antag e over more t raditiona lc olor-m a gnitude d ... | %"}
Historical use_of Strömgren_photometry methods indeed has_been for_the_purpose of_determining_stellar parameters for_early-type stars. Recent_applications include work by_@nieva2013 [@dallemese2012; @onehag2009;_@allende1999]._An advantage over more traditional color-magnitude diagram techniques [@nielsen2013; @de... |
the analytic estimates for higher temperatures. Here one can also see, that $\eta$ stays more or less the same for both species at lower temperature and starts to diverge the more particles are created in the box in the Hagedorn case. The values explode, if the particle number density increases ad infinitum near $T_H$... | the analytic estimates for higher temperatures. Here one can also visualize, that $ \eta$ quell more or less the same for both species at lower temperature and begin to diverge the more particles are create in the corner in the Hagedorn case. The values explode, if the particle number concentration increases ad infinit... | thf analytic estimates for higher temperajuees. Hece one dan also see, that $\eta$ stays more or pews tht same for both spezies at llwer temperauure and starts to divergc the lore 'articles are cteated in tha box in the Hdgddlrn case. The values explode, if the [articlr jumber density incgewses ad infinitum near $T_H$... | the analytic estimates for higher temperatures. Here also that $\eta$ more or less at temperature and starts diverge the more are created in the box in Hagedorn case. The values explode, if the particle number density increases ad infinitum $T_H$. Nevertheless, it increases less rapidly than the entropy density as show... | the analytic estimates for hiGher temperAtureS. HeRe oNe Can aLso sEe, that $\eta$ stays MOre oR less the same for both speCies aT lOWer tEMpEratuRe and stARtS TO diVeRgE thE mORe PartiCleS are creAted in the bOx iN tHe Hagedorn caSE. THe values exPloDe, if the partiCle Number DeNsiTY incrEasEs ad iNfinitUM near $T_h$... | the analytic estimates fo r higher t emper atu res .Here one can also see, that $\eta$ stays more orlessth e sam e f or bo th spec i es a t l ow er te mp e ra tureand starts to diverg e t he more partic l es are creat edin the box i n t he Hag ed orn case. Th e val ues ex p lode,if the pa rt i cle nu m ber ... | the_analytic estimates_for higher temperatures. Here_one can_also_see, that_$\eta$_stays more or_less the same_for both species at_lower temperature and_starts_to diverge the more particles are created in the box in the Hagedorn case._The_values explode,_if_the_particle number density increases ad_infinitum near $T_H$... |
weak in the radio. The more massive galaxies tend to be FUV faint but are more luminous in the radio. Note here that [$K_s$]{}magnitudes are in the Vega system and FUV are in the AB system.[]{data-label="fig:fuv-k_mk"}](fig3.pdf){width="50.00000%"}
We have examined the 13 FUV bright galaxies for evidence of star form... | weak in the radio. The more massive galaxies tend to be FUV faint but are more luminous in the radio receiver. notice here that [ $ K_s$]{}magnitudes are in the Vega organization and FUV are in the AB system.[]{data - label="fig: fuv - k_mk"}](fig3.pdf){width="50.00000% " }
We have examined the 13 FUV undimmed galax... | wewk in the radio. The more massive galaxigs tend vo be FHV faint but are more luminous in thx raeio. Nite here that [$K_s$]{}magnitjdes are pn the Veta sbstem and FUV arx in the AB syabem.[]{daca-oabel="fig:fuv-k_mk"}](nig3.pdf){width="50.00000%"}
Fe have examinad tke 13 FUV bright galaxies for evidence of stat vorm... | weak in the radio. The more massive to FUV faint are more luminous that are in the system and FUV in the AB system.[]{data-label="fig:fuv-k_mk"}](fig3.pdf){width="50.00000%"} We have the 13 FUV bright galaxies for evidence of star formation. These fall into categories: - Galaxies with on-going star formation: The two b... | weak in the radio. The more massIve galaxieS tend To bE FUv fAint But aRe more luminous IN the Radio. Note here that [$K_s$]{}magNitudEs ARe in THe vega sYstem anD fUv ARe iN tHe aB sYsTEm.[]{Data-lAbeL="fig:fuv-K_mk"}](fig3.pdf){wIdtH="50.00000%"}
WE have examineD ThE 13 FUV bright GalAxies for evidEncE of staR fOrm... | weak in the radio. The mo re massive gala xie s t en d to beFUV faint buta re m ore luminous in the ra dio.No t e he r ethat[$K_s$] { }m a g nit ud es ar ei nthe V ega system and FUV a rein the AB syst e m. []{data-la bel ="fig:fuv-k_ mk" }](fig 3. pdf ) {widt h=" 50.00 000%"}
We ha ve examin ed the 13 FUV bri ... | weak_in the_radio. The more massive_galaxies tend_to_be FUV_faint_but are more_luminous in the_radio. Note here that_[$K_s$]{}magnitudes are in_the_Vega system and FUV are in the AB system.[]{data-label="fig:fuv-k_mk"}](fig3.pdf){width="50.00000%"}
We have examined the 13 FUV_bright_galaxies for_evidence_of_star form... |
-n)\right).$$ In particular, letting $d=3$ and $i=1$ and using definitions of $B^{1,1}_{n-2}$ and $B^{1,0}_{n-2}$, we obtain that $$\label{eq:facets-of-B^{3,1}}
B^{3,1}_n=\Big( (n-2, n-3, \dots, 1, -n+2, -n+3, \dots, -1)* (n-1, n) \Big) \cup \Big( (1, -n+2)*(n, -n+1, -n)\Big).$$ In Section \[sec:Facets\], we will use ... | -n)\right).$$ In particular, letting $ d=3 $ and $ i=1 $ and using definitions of $ B^{1,1}_{n-2}$ and $ B^{1,0}_{n-2}$, we receive that $ $ \label{eq: aspect - of - B^{3,1 } }
B^{3,1}_n=\Big (( n-2, n-3, \dots, 1, -n+2, -n+3, \dots, -1) * (n-1, n) \Big) \cup \Big (( 1, -n+2)*(n, -n+1, -n)\Big).$$ In Section \[sec: F... | -n)\rlght).$$ In particular, lettikg $d=3$ and $i=1$ and using dehinitiohs of $B^{1,1}_{n-2}$ and $B^{1,0}_{n-2}$, we obtain that $$\label{xq:faxets-od-B^{3,1}}
B^{3,1}_n=\Big( (n-2, n-3, \dots, 1, -n+2, -n+3, \aots, -1)* (n-1, n) \Big) \cup \Big( (1, -n+2)*(n, -n+1, -n)\Big).$$ In Sectljn \[ssg:Facecs\], we will use ... | -n)\right).$$ In particular, letting $d=3$ and $i=1$ definitions $B^{1,1}_{n-2}$ and we obtain that 1, -n+3, \dots, -1)* n) \Big) \cup (1, -n+2)*(n, -n+1, -n)\Big).$$ In Section we will use this description of $B^{3,1}_n$ to characterize all facets of $\Delta^3_n$. big portion of [@N-Z Section 3] is devoted to showing ... | -n)\right).$$ In particular, letting $D=3$ and $i=1$ and usIng deFinItiOnS of $B^{1,1}_{N-2}$ and $b^{1,0}_{n-2}$, we obtain that $$\LAbel{Eq:facets-of-B^{3,1}}
B^{3,1}_n=\Big( (n-2, n-3, \dots, 1, -N+2, -n+3, \dotS, -1)* (n-1, N) \big) \cUP \BIg( (1, -n+2)*(n, -n+1, -N)\Big).$$ In SECtION \[seC:FAcEts\], We WIlL use ... | -n)\right).$$ In particul ar, lettin g $d= 3$and $ i=1$ and using definit i onsof $B^{1,1}_{n-2}$ and $B^{ 1, 0 }_{n - 2} $, we obtain th a t $$ \l ab el{ eq : fa cets- of- B^{3,1} }
B^{3,1}_ n=\ Bi g( (n-2, n-3 , \ dots, 1, - n+2 , -n+3, \dot s,-1)* ( n- 1,n ) \Bi g)\cup\Big(( 1, -n+ 2)*(n, -n +1 , -n)\B i g)... | -n)\right).$$_In particular,_letting $d=3$ and $i=1$_and using_definitions_of $B^{1,1}_{n-2}$_and_$B^{1,0}_{n-2}$, we obtain_that $$\label{eq:facets-of-B^{3,1}}
B^{3,1}_n=\Big( (n-2,_n-3, \dots, 1, -n+2,_-n+3, \dots, -1)*_(n-1,_n) \Big) \cup \Big( (1, -n+2)*(n, -n+1, -n)\Big).$$ In Section \[sec:Facets\], we will use_... |
that used in our earlier works [@HN; @AdP]. This adjustment has been made in order to conform with the convention established in [@BHN]. Various formulas below correct some other sign errors in [@HN; @AdP] for which *errata* are in preparation.) Although our model makes sense for all values of the parameters, there ar... | that used in our earlier works [ @HN; @AdP ]. This adjustment has been make in decree to conform with the convention established in [ @BHN ]. respective formulas below correct some early sign errors in [ @HN; @AdP ] for which * errata * are in formulation .) Although our model makes common sense for all values of... | thwt used in our earlier wurks [@HN; @AdP]. This adjustkent hzs been oade in order to conform witi thw concention established in [@CHN]. Variols formulqs btlow correct some other slyn erdlrs nn [@IN; @AdP] for whicm *errata* ara in preparatimn.) Apthough our model makes sense for ajl valurs of the paramejers, uhewe ad... | that used in our earlier works [@HN; adjustment been made order to conform [@BHN]. formulas below correct other sign errors [@HN; @AdP] for which *errata* are preparation.) Although our model makes sense for all values of the parameters, there certain inequalities that identify what can be regarded as the *physical* ra... | that used in our earlier works [@hN; @AdP]. This aDjustMenT haS bEen mAde iN order to conforM With The convention establishEd in [@BhN]. vArioUS fOrmulAs below COrRECt sOmE oTheR sIGn ErrorS in [@hN; @AdP] foR which *erraTa* aRe In preparatioN.) alThough our mOdeL makes sense fOr aLl valuEs Of tHE paraMetErs, thEre ar... | that used in our earlierworks [@HN ; @Ad P]. Th is adj ustm ent has been m a de i n order to conform wit h the c o nven t io n est ablishe d i n [@B HN ]. Va ri o us form ula s below correct s ome o ther sign er r or s in [@HN; @A dP] for whic h * errata *are in pr epa ratio n.) Al t houghour model m a kes s... | that_used in_our earlier works [@HN; @AdP]._This adjustment_has_been made_in_order to conform_with the convention_established in [@BHN]. Various formulas_below correct some_other_sign errors in [@HN; @AdP] for which *errata* are in preparation.) Although our model makes_sense_for all_values_of_the parameters, there ar... |
affect the probability distributions for distant measurements.) The end result of the completed teleportation process is that Bob’s ensemble is ascribed the state ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$; where this merely means that the statistics one will expect for measurements on Bob’s ensemble are now the same as those one would hav... | affect the probability distributions for distant measurements .) The goal resultant role of the completed teleportation process is that Bob ’s ensemble is impute the state $ { |\chi\rangle _ { } } $; where this merely means that the statistics one will ask for measurements on Bob ’s ensemble are nowadays the same as th... | afvect the probability disuributions for distant mxasuremsnts.) The end result of the completed twlepoetation process is thag Bob’s endemble iw asrribed the state ${|\chi\rangle _{}}$; whsve thns merely means jhat the stadistics one winl erpect for measurements on Bob’s ensemfle are nlw the same as thoxq ons would hav... | affect the probability distributions for distant measurements.) result the completed process is that state _{}}$; where this means that the one will expect for measurements on ensemble are now the same as those one would have expected for measurements the initial ensemble presented to Alice. The ensemble viewpoint pres... | affect the probability distrIbutions foR distAnt MeaSuRemeNts.) THe end result of tHE comPleted teleportation proCess iS tHAt BoB’S eNsembLe is ascRIbED The StAtE ${|\chI\rANgLe _{}}$; wheRe tHis mereLy means thaT thE sTatistics one WIlL expect for MeaSurements on BOb’s EnsembLe Are NOw the SamE as thOse one WOuld haV... | affect the probability di stribution s for di sta nt mea sure ments.) The en d res ult of the completed t elepo rt a tion pr ocess is tha t B o b ’sen se mbl ei sascri bed the st ate ${|\ch i\r an gle _{}}$; w h er e this mer ely means thatthe stati st ics one w ill expe ct for measur ements on B o b’s en s ... | affect_the probability_distributions for distant measurements.)_The end_result_of the_completed_teleportation process is_that Bob’s ensemble_is ascribed the state_${|\chi\rangle _{}}$; where_this_merely means that the statistics one will expect for measurements on Bob’s ensemble are_now_the same_as_those_one would hav... |
}{\rm Mpc}$ runs at each targeted redshift. Different line styles and colors refer to the varying mass resolutions, as specified in the plot. The right panels display 1D flux power spectrum ratios for realizations having $N^3=128^3, 256^3, 336^3$, respectively, estimated with respect to the highest-resolution run (i.e.... | } { \rm Mpc}$ runs at each targeted redshift. Different course stylus and colors denote to the deviate mass resolutions, as specify in the plot. The correct panels expose 1D magnetic field power spectrum proportion for realizations having $ N^3=128 ^ 3, 256 ^ 3, 336 ^ 3 $, respectively, calculate with regard to the hig... | }{\rm Lpc}$ runs at each targetea redshift. Diffgrwnt liie stylss and culors refer to the varying mess eesolytions, as specified in the plot. The rigyt penels display 1D hmux powcx spedbrum xavios for realizstions havhng $N^3=128^3, 256^3, 336^3$, respecdixepy, estimated with respect to the hidhest-rexopution run (i.e.... | }{\rm Mpc}$ runs at each targeted redshift. styles colors refer the varying mass plot. right panels display flux power spectrum for realizations having $N^3=128^3, 256^3, 336^3$, estimated with respect to the highest-resolution run (i.e. “L10\_N512", having an equivalent grid of $20h^{-1}{\rm kpc}$), expressed in perce... | }{\rm Mpc}$ runs at each targeted reDshift. DiffErent LinE stYlEs anD colOrs refer to the vARyinG mass resolutions, as specIfied In THe plOT. THe rigHt panelS DiSPLay 1d fLuX poWeR SpEctruM raTios for RealizatioNs hAvIng $N^3=128^3, 256^3, 336^3$, respectiVElY, estimated WitH respect to thE hiGhest-rEsOluTIon ruN (i.e.... | }{\rm Mpc}$ runs at each t argeted re dshif t.Dif fe rent lin e styles and c o lors refer to the varyingmassre s olut i on s, as specif i ed i n t he p lot .T he righ t p anels d isplay 1Dflu xpower spectr u mratios for re alizations h avi ng $N^ 3= 128 ^ 3, 25 6^3 , 336 ^3$, r e specti vely, est im a ted wi t h ... | }{\rm Mpc}$_runs at_each targeted redshift. Different_line styles_and_colors refer_to_the varying mass_resolutions, as specified_in the plot. The_right panels display_1D_flux power spectrum ratios for realizations having $N^3=128^3, 256^3, 336^3$, respectively, estimated with respect_to_the highest-resolution_run_(i.e.... |
1953 6.51
WDM$^{\dagger}$\_UN\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 3.0460 0.8305 25 128 0.1953 6.51
WDM$^{\dagger}$\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 ... | 1953 6.51
WDM$^{\dagger}$\_UN\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 3.0460 0.8305 25 128 0.1953 6.51
WDM$^{\dagger}$\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 ... | 1953 6.51
DDM$^{\dagger}$\_UN\_0.25\_keV c 0.0 0.25 3.0460 0.8305 25 128 0.1953 6.51
WDK$^{\dagger}$\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 ... | 1953 6.51 WDM$^{\dagger}$\_UN\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 3.0460 128 6.51 WDM$^{\dagger}$\_0.25\_keV 0.0 0.25 3.0460 WDM\_UN\_0.25\_keV 0.0 0.25 3.0617 25 128 0.1953 WDM\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 3.0617 0.8150 128 0.1953 6.51 WDM$^{\dagger}$\_1.00\_keV a/b/c 0.0 1.00 3.0460 0.8150 25/100/100 256/512/832 0.0976/0.1953/0.1202 3.25... | 1953 6.51
WDM$^{\dagger}$\_UN\_0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.25 3.0460 0.8305 25 128 0.1953 6.51
WDM$^{\dagger}$\_0.25\_kEV a 0.0 0.25 ... | 1953 6.5 1
WDM$^ {\d agg er }$\_ UN\_ 0.25\_keV a 0.0 0.2 5 3. 0 4 60 0. 8305 25 128 0.1953 6 .51
WDM$^ { \dagge r}$\_0.25 \_ k eV a 0.0 0.25 3 . 04 6 0 ... | 1953 _ _ _ __ __ _ 6.51
_ _ _WDM$^{\dagger}$\_UN\_0.25\_keV_a __ 0.0___ _ _ _ 0.25 __ _ 3.0460_ _ __0.8305_ _ _ 25 _ _ _ 128 _ _ _ _ _ _0.1953 _ _ __ _6.51
__ _ __ _WDM$^{\dagger}$\_0.25\_keV_a __ _ _0.0_ _ _ _ _ _0.25 ... |
to integrate with all detectors for fair comparison of the *detector* matching performances. So we overlook the description performance.
Method
======
This section defines ELF, a detection method valid for any trained CNN. Keypoints are local maxima of a saliency map computed as the feature gradient *w.r.t* the imag... | to integrate with all detectors for fair comparison of the * detector * matching performance. therefore we overlook the description performance.
Method
= = = = = =
This section define ELF, a detection method valid for any educate CNN. Keypoints are local maxima of a saliency function calculate as the feature gr... | to integrate with all detegtors for fair comparismn of fhe *deteztor* matching performances. Sl qe ovtglook the description performajce.
Methoe
======
Thiw section dxrines ELF, a dsbectimi method valid nor any trahned CNN. Keypohngs are local maxima of a saliency map computrd as the featurg gracyent *w.r.t* the imag... | to integrate with all detectors for fair the matching performances. we overlook the section ELF, a detection valid for any CNN. Keypoints are local maxima of saliency map computed as the feature gradient *w.r.t* the image. We use the adaptive Kapur method [@kapur1985new] to automatically threshold the saliency map and ... | to integrate with all detectoRs for fair cOmparIsoN of ThE *detEctoR* matching perfoRMancEs. So we overlook the descrIptioN pERforMAnCe.
MetHod
======
This SEcTIOn dEfInEs ElF, A DeTectiOn mEthod vaLid for any tRaiNeD CNN. KeypointS ArE local maxiMa oF a saliency maP coMputed As The FEaturE grAdienT *w.r.t* thE Imag... | to integrate with all det ectors for fair co mpa ri sonof t he *detector*m atch ing performances. So w e ove rl o ok t h edescr iptionp er f o rma nc e.
M et h od
==== ==
This s ection def ine sELF, a detec t io n method v ali d for any tr ain ed CNN .Key p oints ar e loc al max i ma ofa salienc ym ap com p uted... | to_integrate with_all detectors for fair_comparison of_the_*detector* matching_performances._So we overlook_the description performance.
Method
======
This_section defines ELF, a_detection method valid_for_any trained CNN. Keypoints are local maxima of a saliency map computed as the_feature_gradient *w.r.t*_the_imag... |
operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))$ on $\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \mathcal{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga [@wedd], we can see that $\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))=G$. Suppose $q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. The relations between group elements yield that $\varepsilon_{\mat... | operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H, K))$ on $ \{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H, K)~|~ \mathcal{C } \in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga [ @wedd ], we can see that $ \operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H, K))=G$. Suppose $ q\equiv 1 (\operatorname{mod}5)$. The relations between group chemical element concede that... | opegatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,Y))$ on $\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{R}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \matgcal{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga [@wedd], we cai sew thau $\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\vxrepsilon^{(1)}(J,K))=G$. Suppise $w\wquiv 1 (\opecztornamc{iod}5)$. Fme renetions between nroup elemetts yield that $\vxrzpsilon_{\mat... | operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))$ on $\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \mathcal{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using we see that Suppose $q\equiv 1 elements that $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)^{x_{2}} = Hence $x_2$ does centralize $\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}_\sigma}^{(1)}(H,K)$. Since $G/H_1$ is cyc... | operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsiloN^{(1)}(H,K))$ on $\{\varepSilon_{\MatHcaL{C}}^{(1)}(h,K)~|~ \maThcaL{C} \in R_{1}\}$. Using WeddERga [@wEdd], we can see that $\operatoRname{ceN}_{g}(\varEPsIlon^{(1)}(H,k))=G$. SuppoSE $q\EQUiv 1 (\OpErAtoRnAMe{Mod}5)$. ThE reLations Between groUp eLeMents yield thAT $\vArepsilon_{\mAt... | operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\var epsilon^{( 1)}(H ,K) )$on $\{ \var epsilon_{\math c al{C }}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \math cal{C }\ in R _ {1 }\}$. UsingW ed d e rga [ @w edd ], we cansee that $ \operatorn ame {C en}_{G}(\var e ps ilon^{(1)} (H, K))=G$. Supp ose $q\eq ui v 1 (\ope rat ornam e{mod} 5 )$. Th e relatio ns betwee n ... | operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))$ on_$\{\varepsilon_{\mathcal{C}}^{(1)}(H,K)~|~ \mathcal{C}_\in R_{1}\}$. Using Wedderga_[@wedd], we_can_see that_$\operatorname{Cen}_{G}(\varepsilon^{(1)}(H,K))=G$._Suppose $q\equiv 1_(\operatorname{mod}5)$. The relations_between group elements yield_that $\varepsilon_{\mat... |
.
Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for the radiator and hence (\[crossdiff\]) for the cross sections, is applicable, with power and subleading logarithmic corrections for values of $\tau_a$ away from the end-point region, where the variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becomes of order unity. That is, we require $[\beta_0/(2 \pi)] \as ... | .
Eq. (\[crossintsol\ ]) for the radiator and hence (\[crossdiff\ ]) for the cross sections, is applicable, with power and subleading logarithmic correction for value of $ \tau_a$ away from the end - point area, where the variable $ x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\ ]) becomes of order integrity. That is, we require $ [ \beta_... | .
Eq. (\[cgossintsol\]) for the radiauor and hence (\[crossdiff\]) hor the cross sdctions, is applicable, with plwwr ane subleading logarithmkc correcnions for valnes of $\tau_a$ away from thc end-llint cegion, where thg variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becmmds of order unity. That is, we require $[\feta_0/(2 \pi)] \ad ... | . Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for the radiator and for cross sections, applicable, with power values $\tau_a$ away from end-point region, where variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becomes order unity. That is, we require $[\beta_0/(2 \pi)] \as \ln (1/\tau_a)$ $< 1$, equivalently $\tau_a > \LQCD/Q$. For $\tau_a \sim \LQCD/Q$ non-p... | .
Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for the radiatOr and hence (\[CrossDifF\]) foR tHe crOss sEctions, is appliCAble, With power and subleading LogarItHMic cORrEctioNs for vaLUeS OF $\taU_a$ AwAy fRoM ThE end-pOinT region, Where the vaRiaBlE $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) beCOmEs of order uNitY. That is, we reqUirE $[\beta_0/(2 \pI)] \aS ... | .
Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) f or the rad iator an d h en ce ( \[cr ossdiff\]) for thecross sections, is app licab le , wit h p owerand sub l ea d i nglo ga rit hm i ccorre cti ons for values of $\ ta u_a$ away fr o mthe end-po int region, whe rethe va ri abl e $x$inEq. ( \[xdef \ ]) bec omes of o rd e r unit y . Th... | .
Eq. (\[crossintsol\]) for_the radiator_and hence (\[crossdiff\]) for_the cross_sections,_is applicable,_with_power and subleading_logarithmic corrections for_values of $\tau_a$ away_from the end-point_region,_where the variable $x$ in Eq. (\[xdef\]) becomes of order unity. That is, we require_$[\beta_0/(2_\pi)] \as_... |
A_{i_n}$.
ii\) Given an open cover $\mathcal U$ of $X$ and a point $x \in X$, the order of $\mathcal U$ at $x$, $\operatorname{{\rm Ord}}_x\mathcal U$, is the number of elements of $\mathcal U$ that contain $x$.
We will make use of the following result that appears in [@Dr2]:
\[order\] A family $\mathcal U$ that c... | A_{i_n}$.
ii\) Given an open cover $ \mathcal U$ of $ X$ and a point $ x \in X$, the decree of $ \mathcal U$ at $ x$, $ \operatorname{{\rm Ord}}_x\mathcal U$, is the numeral of elements of $ \mathcal U$ that contain $ x$.
We will make consumption of the following result that appears in [ @Dr2 ]:
\[order\ ] A... |
A_{i_n}$.
li\) Given an open cover $\mxthcal U$ of $X$ aue a pomnt $x \ih X$, the urder of $\mathcal U$ at $x$, $\operetorbame{{\rn Ord}}_x\mathcal U$, is the number ov elemenrs oh $\mathcal U$ that contain $x$.
We wjpl mckx use of the foklowing revult that appedrr nn [@Dr2]:
\[order\] A family $\mathcal U$ that c... | A_{i_n}$. ii\) Given an open cover $\mathcal $X$ a point \in X$, the $x$, Ord}}_x\mathcal U$, is number of elements $\mathcal U$ that contain $x$. We make use of the following result that appears in [@Dr2]: \[order\] A family U$ that consists of $m$ subsets of $X$ is an $(n + 1)$-cover $X$ and if Ord}}_x \mathcal U \ge... |
A_{i_n}$.
ii\) Given an open cover $\mathCal U$ of $X$ and A poinT $x \iN X$, tHe OrdeR of $\mAthcal U$ at $x$, $\operATornAme{{\rm Ord}}_x\mathcal U$, is the NumbeR oF ElemENtS of $\maThcal U$ tHAt CONtaIn $X$.
WE wiLl MAkE use oF thE followIng result tHat ApPears in [@Dr2]:
\[ordER\] A Family $\mathCal u$ that c... |
A_{i_n}$.
ii\) Given anopen cover $\ma thc alU$ of$X$and a point $x \inX$, the order of $\mat hcalU$ at $ x $, $\op eratorn a me { { \rm O rd }}_ x\ m at hcalU$, is the number of el em ents of $\ma t hc al U$ that co ntain $x$.
Wewill m ak e u s e ofthe foll owingr esultthat appe ar s in [ @ Dr2]:
\ [ or d... |
A_{i_n}$.
ii\) Given_an open_cover $\mathcal U$ of_$X$ and_a_point $x_\in_X$, the order_of $\mathcal U$_at $x$, $\operatorname{{\rm Ord}}_x\mathcal_U$, is the_number_of elements of $\mathcal U$ that contain $x$.
We will make use of the following_result_that appears_in_ [@Dr2]:
\[order\]_A family $\mathcal U$ that_c... |
],\, \left[e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt]
&& \left. \left[-e^{135}+e^{236}-e^{146}-e^{245}\right],\, \left[-e^{136}-e^{235}+e^{145}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt]
&& \left. \left[e^{135}+e^{245}+e^{236}-e^{146}\right],\, \left[-e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}+e^{246}\right]\right\rangle \;, \\[5... | ], \, \left[e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt ]
& & \left. \left[-e^{135}+e^{236}-e^{146}-e^{245}\right],\, \left[-e^{136}-e^{235}+e^{145}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt ]
& & \left. \left[e^{135}+e^{245}+e^{236}-e^{146}\right],\, \left[-e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}+e^{246}\right]\right\rangle... | ],\, \levt[e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt]
&& \lent. \left[-e^{135}+e^{236}-e^{146}-e^{245}\right],\, \left[-e^{136}-e^{235}+x^{145}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pg]
&& \left. \left[e^{135}+e^{245}+e^{236}-e^{146}\right],\, \left[-e^{235}+e^{145}+x^{136}+e^{246}\ritht]\ritht\rangle \;, \\[5... | ],\, \left[e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt] && \left. \left[-e^{135}+e^{236}-e^{146}-e^{245}\right],\, \\[5pt] \left. \left[e^{135}+e^{245}+e^{236}-e^{146}\right],\, \;, \\[5pt] H^4_{dR}(M;{\mathbb{R}}) \left[e^{1346}+e^{2345}\right],\, \\[5pt] && \left. \left[e^{1236}+e^{1245}\right],\, \left[... | ],\, \left[e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}-e^{246}\right],\, \right. \\[5pt]
&& \left. \lEft[-e^{135}+e^{236}-e^{146}-e^{245}\rigHt],\, \lefT[-e^{136}-e^{235}+E^{145}-e^{246}\rIgHt],\, \riGht. \\[5pT]
&& \left. \left[e^{135}+e^{245}+e^{236}-e^{146}\rIGht],\, \lEft[-e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}+e^{246}\right]\right\ranglE \;, \\[5... | ],\, \left[e^{235}+e^{145} +e^{136}-e ^{246 }\r igh t] ,\,\rig ht. \\[5pt]
& & \le ft. \left[-e^{135}+e^{ 236}- e^ { 146} - e^ {245} \right] , \, \ lef t[ -e ^{1 36 } -e ^{235 }+e ^{145}- e^{246}\ri ght ], \, \right. \ \ [5 pt]
&& \l eft . \left[e^{1 35} +e^{24 5} +e^ { 236}- e^{ 146}\ right] , \, \le ft[-e^{23 5} +... | ],\, \left[e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}-e^{246}\right],\,_\right. \\[5pt]
_&& \left. \left[-e^{135}+e^{236}-e^{146}-e^{245}\right],\, \left[-e^{136}-e^{235}+e^{145}-e^{246}\right],\,_\right. \\[5pt]
_&&_\left. \left[e^{135}+e^{245}+e^{236}-e^{146}\right],\,_\left[-e^{235}+e^{145}+e^{136}+e^{246}\right]\right\rangle_\;, \\[5... |
, \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu (E)=n+m$. In particular, $\mu(U) \geq \mu (V)\geq {\ell(E)}$.
4. The following are equivalent:
1. $V\subseteq E$ is a reduction and $\mu (V)={\ell(E)}$.
2. If $V=\langle a_1, \ldots,a_n \rangle$ with $n=\mu(V)$, then ${{{\overline}{a}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overline}{a}}_{n}} \in ... | , \ldots, b_m \rangle = E$ and $ \mu (E)=n+m$. In particular, $ \mu(U) \geq \mu (V)\geq { \ell(E)}$.
4. The following are equivalent:
1. $ V\subseteq E$ is a reduction and $ \mu (V)={\ell(E)}$.
2. If $ V=\langle a_1, \ldots, a_n \rangle$ with $ n=\mu(V)$, then $ { { { \overline}{a}}_1,\dotsc,{{\o... | , \ldlts, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu (E)=k+m$. In particular, $\mu(U) \gex \mu (V)\feq {\ell(E)}$.
4. The following are equivaleit:
1. $V\wubseteq E$ is a reductkon and $\ml (V)={\ell(E)}$.
2. Mf $V=\langle a_1, \ldova,a_n \rannje$ wjbh $n=\mb(V)$, then ${{{\overline}{s}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overnine}{a}}_{n}} \in ... | , \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu particular, \geq \mu {\ell(E)}$. 4. The E$ a reduction and (V)={\ell(E)}$. 2. If a_1, \ldots,a_n \rangle$ with $n=\mu(V)$, then \in {{{\mathcal F}}(E)}$ is a homogeneous system of parameters. And if any of two equivalent conditions holds, $V$ is a minimal reduction of $E$. 5. If resid... | , \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$ and $\mu (E)=n+m$. In pArticular, $\mU(U) \geq \Mu (V)\Geq {\ElL(E)}$.
4. ThE folLowing are equivALent:
1. $v\subseteq E$ is a reduction And $\mu (v)={\eLL(E)}$.
2. If $v=\LaNgle a_1, \Ldots,a_n \RAnGLE$ wiTh $N=\mU(V)$, tHeN ${{{\OvErlinE}{a}}_1,\dOtsc,{{\oveRline}{a}}_{n}} \in ... | , \ldots, b_m \rangle =E$and $\mu ( E)=n+ m$. In p arti cula r, $\mu(U) \ge q \mu (V)\geq {\ell(E)}$.
4. T he foll o wi ng ar e equiv a le n t :
1. $ V \s ubset eqE$ is a reduction an d$\mu (V)={\e l l( E)}$.
2. If $V=\lan gle a_1,\l dot s ,a_n\ra ngle$ with$ n=\mu( V)$, then $ { {{\ove r line}{a } } ... | , \ldots,_b_m \rangle_=E$ and $\mu (E)=n+m$._In particular,_$\mu(U)_\geq \mu_(V)\geq_{\ell(E)}$.
4. The_following are equivalent:
_ 1._ $V\subseteq E$_is_a reduction and $\mu (V)={\ell(E)}$.
2. If $V=\langle a_1, \ldots,a_n_\rangle$_with $n=\mu(V)$,_then_${{{\overline}{a}}_1,\dotsc,{{\overline}{a}}_{n}}_\in ... |
, we vary $S$-wave parameters to describe 61 energy levels taken from $A_1$ irreps: $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, $[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$. The result, with $\chi^2/N_\mathrm{dof} = 49.1/(61-6) = 0.89$, is:
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------... | , we vary $ S$-wave parameters to describe 61 energy degree accept from $ A_1 $ irreps: $ [ 000](16,20,24)$, $ [ 001](20,24)$, $ [ 011](20,24)$, $ [ 111](20,24)$ and $ [ 002](20,24)$. The result, with $ \chi^2 / N_\mathrm{dof } = 49.1/(61 - 6) = 0.89 $, is:
------------------------------ --------------------------... | , we vary $S$-wave parameters tu describe 61 enetgt levens taksn from $X_1$ irreps: $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, $[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$. The result, wuth $\cyi^2/N_\mathrm{dof} = 49.1/(61-6) = 0.89$, is:
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------... | , we vary $S$-wave parameters to describe levels from $A_1$ $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, with = 49.1/(61-6) = is: ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- $m = $ $(0.2458 \pm 0.0014 0.0004) \cdot a_t^{-1}$ $g_{\pi K} = $ $(0.156 \pm 0.004 \pm 0.001) \cdot $g... | , we vary $S$-wave parameters to deScribe 61 enerGy levEls TakEn From $a_1$ irrEps: $[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$, $[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$. The resulT, With $\Chi^2/N_\mathrm{dof} = 49.1/(61-6) = 0.89$, is:
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------... | , we vary $S$-wave paramet ers to des cribe 61 en er gy l evel s taken from $ A _1$irreps: $[000](16,20,2 4)$,$[ 0 01]( 2 0, 24)$, $[011] ( 20 , 2 4)$ ,$[ 111 ]( 2 0, 24)$and $[002] (20,24)$.The r esult, with$ \c hi^2/N_\ma thr m{dof} = 49. 1/( 61-6)=0.8 9 $, is :
--- ------ - ------ --------- -- - -- --- - ----... | , we_vary $S$-wave_parameters to describe 61_energy levels_taken_from $A_1$_irreps:_$[000](16,20,24)$, $[001](20,24)$, $[011](20,24)$,_$[111](20,24)$ and $[002](20,24)$._The result, with $\chi^2/N_\mathrm{dof}_= 49.1/(61-6) =_0.89$,_is:
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------... |
8pt{F}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @Angulo_99
\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$]{}
[$\rm\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @Angulo_99
\,{}^{21}\kern-0.8pt{Na}\,$]{}
[$\rm\,{}^{21}\kern-... | 8pt{F}\,({p}\,,{\gamma }) @Angulo_99
\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$ ] { }
[ $ \rm\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma }) @Angulo_99
\,{}^{21}\kern-0.8pt{Na}\,$ ] { }
[ ... | 8pt{F}\,({o}\,,{\gamma}) @Angulo_99
\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8't{Ne}\,$]{}
[$\rm\,{}^{20}\keen-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @Antulo_99
\,{}^{21}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$]{}
[$\rk\,{}^{21}\kern-... | 8pt{F}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @Angulo_99 \,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$]{} [$\rm\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @Angulo_99 \,{}^{21}\kern-0.8pt{Na}\,$]{} [$\rm\,{}^{21}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) [$\rm\,{}^{22}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) \,{}^{23}\kern-0.8pt{Na}\,$]{} [$\rm\,{}^{23}\kern-0.8pt{Na}\,({p}\... | 8pt{F}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @Angulo_99
\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$]{}
[$\rm\,{}^{20}\Kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gAmma}) @ANguLo_99
\,{}^{21}\kErN-0.8pt{NA}\,$]{}
[$\rm\,{}^{21}\kErn-... | 8pt{F}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) @An gulo _99
\,{}^{ 2 0}\k ern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$]{}
[ $\ r m\ ,{}^{ 20} \kern-0 .8pt{Ne}\, ({p }\ ,,{\gamma}) @Ang ulo _99
\,{ } ^{21} \ke rn-0. 8pt{Na } \,$]{}
[$\rm\, { }^ { 21}\kern-0.8pt {Ne}... | 8pt{F}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) _ _ _ __ __ _ _ _ @Angulo_99
__ \,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,$]{} __ ___ _ _ _ __
_ [$\rm\,{}^{20}\kern-0.8pt{Ne}\,({p}\,,{\gamma}) _ _ ___ _ @Angulo_99
_\,{}^{21}\kern-0.8pt{Na}\,$]{} _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
[$\rm\,{}^{21}\kern-... |
is square integrable modulo $Z$, the function $$\phi_{ik}(x)=\overline{c_{e_i,v_k}(s(x))}c_{e_i,u_k}(s(x))
= \ip{v_k}{\pi(s(x))e_i}\ip{e_i}{\pi(s(x))^{-1}u_k}$$ is $\alpha$-integrable on $X$ and, using the Hölder inequality and the orthogonality relations (\[ort1\]), \_E |\_[ik]{}(x)|d(x) & & ( \_E |c\_[e\_i,v\_k]{}(s... | is square integrable modulo $ Z$, the function $ $ \phi_{ik}(x)=\overline{c_{e_i, v_k}(s(x))}c_{e_i, u_k}(s(x) )
= \ip{v_k}{\pi(s(x))e_i}\ip{e_i}{\pi(s(x))^{-1}u_k}$$ is $ \alpha$-integrable on $ X$ and, using the Hölder inequality and the orthogonality relations (\[ort1\ ]), \_E |\_[ik]{}(x)|d(x) & & (\_E |c\_[e\_... | is square integrable modulu $Z$, the functiou $$\phi_{ik}(e)=\overlihe{c_{e_i,v_k}(s(b))}c_{e_i,u_k}(s(x))
= \ip{v_k}{\pi(s(x))e_i}\ip{e_i}{\pi(s(x))^{-1}u_n}$$ us $\alkka$-integrable on $X$ ana, using tje Hölder inewyality and the ortmjgonzpity celations (\[ort1\]), \_E |\_[lk]{}(x)|d(x) & & ( \_E |w\_[e\_i,v\_k]{}(s... | is square integrable modulo $Z$, the function \ip{v_k}{\pi(s(x))e_i}\ip{e_i}{\pi(s(x))^{-1}u_k}$$ $\alpha$-integrable on and, using the relations \_E |\_[ik]{}(x)|d(x) & ( \_E |c\_[e\_i,v\_k]{}(s(x))|\^2d(x) & & ( \_E |c\_[e\_i,u\_k]{}(x)|\^2d(x) )\^[12]{}\ \_\_\ & & \^2\_\_\_= 1. Since $\sum_{i,k}\lambda_i w_k = \nor{... | is square integrable modulo $Z$, The functioN $$\phi_{iK}(x)=\oVerLiNe{c_{e_I,v_k}(s(X))}c_{e_i,u_k}(s(x))
= \ip{v_k}{\pi(S(X))e_i}\iP{e_i}{\pi(s(x))^{-1}u_k}$$ is $\alpha$-integrAble oN $X$ ANd, usINg The HöLder ineQUaLITy aNd ThE orThOGoNalitY reLations (\[Ort1\]), \_E |\_[ik]{}(x)|d(x) & & ( \_E |C\_[e\_i,V\_k]{}(S... | is square integrable modu lo $Z$, th e fun cti on$$ \phi _{ik }(x)=\overline { c_{e _i,v_k}(s(x))}c_{e_i,u _k}(s (x ) )
=\ ip {v_k} {\pi(s( x )) e _ i}\ ip {e _i} {\ p i( s(x)) ^{- 1}u_k}$ $ is $\alp ha$ -i ntegrable on $X $ and, usi ngthe Hölder i neq uality a ndt he or tho gonal ity re l ations (\[ort1\ ]) , \_E ... | is_square integrable_modulo $Z$, the function_$$\phi_{ik}(x)=\overline{c_{e_i,v_k}(s(x))}c_{e_i,u_k}(s(x))
= \ip{v_k}{\pi(s(x))e_i}\ip{e_i}{\pi(s(x))^{-1}u_k}$$_is_$\alpha$-integrable on_$X$_and, using the_Hölder inequality and_the orthogonality relations (\[ort1\]), \_E_|\_[ik]{}(x)|d(x) & &_(_\_E |c\_[e\_i,v\_k]{}(s... |
low-mass halos and high redshift universe, gas is acquired primarily through the cold mode accretion, by which cold gas flows can directly feed galaxies through cosmic filaments [@Keres; @2005; @Dekel; @2009a; @Dekel; @2009b; @van; @de; @Voort; @2011]. When a galaxy’s dark matter halo grows massive enough to support a... | low - mass halos and high red shift population, natural gas is acquired chiefly through the cold mode accretion, by which cold natural gas flows can directly run galaxies through cosmic filaments [ @Keres; @2005; @Dekel; @2009a; @Dekel; @2009b; @van; @de; @Voort; @2011 ]. When a galax ’s blue matter halo grow massive e... | loa-mass halos and high redrhift universe, yqs is ecquires primarkly through the cold mode acrretuon, bt which cold gas flows can direbtly feed galexies through cosmic filaments [@Nerev; @2005; @Dekel; @2009a; @Dekek; @2009b; @van; @de; @Voort; @2011]. When a gxlcxy’s dark matter halo grows massive qnough yo support a... | low-mass halos and high redshift universe, gas primarily the cold accretion, by which feed through cosmic filaments @2005; @Dekel; @2009a; @2009b; @van; @de; @Voort; @2011]. When galaxy’s dark matter halo grows massive enough to support a stable shock, the gas is first shock-heated to near the viral temperature ($T\sim... | low-mass halos and high redshiFt universe, Gas is AcqUirEd PrimArilY through the colD Mode Accretion, by which cold gaS flowS cAN dirECtLy feeD galaxiES tHROugH cOsMic FiLAmEnts [@KEreS; @2005; @Dekel; @2009a; @dekel; @2009b; @van; @dE; @VoOrT; @2011]. When a galaxy’S DaRk matter haLo gRows massive eNouGh to suPpOrt A... | low-mass halos and high r edshift un ivers e,gas i s ac quir ed primarily t h roug h the cold mode accret ion,by whic h c old g as flow s c a n di re ct lyfe e dgalax ies throug h cosmic f ila me nts [@Keres; @2 005; @Deke l;@2009a; @Dek el; @2009 b; @v a n; @d e;@Voor t; @20 1 1]. Wh en a gala xy ’ s dark matt... | low-mass_halos and_high redshift universe, gas_is acquired_primarily_through the_cold_mode accretion, by_which cold gas_flows can directly feed_galaxies through cosmic_filaments_[@Keres; @2005; @Dekel; @2009a; @Dekel; @2009b; @van; @de; @Voort; @2011]. When a galaxy’s dark_matter_halo grows_massive_enough_to support a... |
$, $m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha}\geq 1$, and define $Tf(\lambda)=|\lambda|^2\mathcal{F}f(\lambda)$. Since $-m_\alpha-m_{2\alpha}+1\leq 0$, it follows that $(1+|\lambda|)^{-(m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha})+1}\leq 1$ for all $\lambda\in i{\mathfrak{a}}^*$. Moreover, $$\begin{split}
\|Tf\|_2^2 &=\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|Tf(\lambda)|^2|W|^{... | $, $ m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha}\geq 1 $, and define $ Tf(\lambda)=|\lambda|^2\mathcal{F}f(\lambda)$. Since $ -m_\alpha - m_{2\alpha}+1\leq 0 $, it follows that $ (1+|\lambda|)^{-(m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha})+1}\leq 1 $ for all $ \lambda\in i{\mathfrak{a}}^*$. Moreover, $ $ \begin{split }
\|Tf\|_2 ^ 2 & = \int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|... | $, $m_\appha+m_{2\alpha}\geq 1$, and defint $Tf(\lambda)=|\lambda|^2\mcrhcal{F}h(\lambda)$. Since $-m_\xlpha-m_{2\alpha}+1\leq 0$, it follows tiat $(1+|\oambdq|)^{-(m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha})+1}\leq 1$ for xll $\lambdw\in i{\matyfraj{q}}^*$. Moreover, $$\begin{split}
\|Tf\|_2^2 &=\jkt_{i{\machhrak{a}}^*}|Tf(\lambda)|^2|W|^{... | $, $m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha}\geq 1$, and define $Tf(\lambda)=|\lambda|^2\mathcal{F}f(\lambda)$. Since it that $(1+|\lambda|)^{-(m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha})+1}\leq for all $\lambda\in &= &\leq |W|^{-1}\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|\mathcal{F}f(\lambda)|^2|{\mathbf{c}}(\lambda)|^{-2}\,d\lambda = \end{split}$$ so $T$ of strong type $(2,... | $, $m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha}\geq 1$, and define $TF(\lambda)=|\lamBda|^2\maThcAl{F}F(\lAmbdA)$. SinCe $-m_\alpha-m_{2\alpha}+1\LEq 0$, it Follows that $(1+|\lambda|)^{-(m_\alphA+m_{2\alpHa})+1}\LEq 1$ foR AlL $\lambDa\in i{\maTHfRAK{a}}^*$. MOrEoVer, $$\BeGIn{Split}
\|tf\|_2^2 &=\iNt_{i{\mathFrak{a}}^*}|Tf(\lamBda)|^2|w|^{... | $, $m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha}\g eq 1$, and defi ne$Tf (\ lamb da)= |\lambda|^2\ma t hcal {F}f(\lambda)$. Since$-m_\ al p ha-m _ {2 \alph a}+1\le q 0 $ , it f ol low st ha t $(1 +|\ lambda| )^{-(m_\al pha +m _{2\alpha})+ 1 }\ leq 1$ for al l $\lambda\i n i {\math fr ak{ a }}^*$ . M oreov er, $$ \ begin{ split}
\| Tf \ |... | $, $m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha}\geq_1$, and_define $Tf(\lambda)=|\lambda|^2\mathcal{F}f(\lambda)$. Since $-m_\alpha-m_{2\alpha}+1\leq_0$, it_follows_that $(1+|\lambda|)^{-(m_\alpha+m_{2\alpha})+1}\leq_1$_for all $\lambda\in_i{\mathfrak{a}}^*$. Moreover, $$\begin{split}
\|Tf\|_2^2_&=\int_{i{\mathfrak{a}}^*}|Tf(\lambda)|^2|W|^{... |
function by the inclusion-exclusion principle, then using we have $$\label{eq:est_prob_ruin_set}
\P\{Y_1>y_1,\ldots,Y_d>y_d\}\approx \sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{y_j} \bar{\Phi}_{d-1}
\Big\lbrace \Big (\lambda_{k,j} +\frac{\log y_k/y_j }{2\lambda_{k,j}} \Big )_{k \in I_j}; \bar{\Lambda}_j \Big\rbrace,$$ where $\bar{\Phi}_... | function by the inclusion - exclusion principle, then use we take $ $ \label{eq: est_prob_ruin_set }
\P\{Y_1 > y_1,\ldots, Y_d > y_d\}\approx \sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{y_j } \bar{\Phi}_{d-1 }
\Big\lbrace \Big (\lambda_{k, j } + \frac{\log y_k / y_j } { 2\lambda_{k, j } } \Big) _ { k \in I_j }; \bar{\Lambda}_j \Big\... | fujction by the inclusion-ewclusion principle, then using we have $$\label{eq:est_prob_ruin_set}
\P\{Y_1>y_1,\ldovs,Y_d>t_d\}\appeox \sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{y_j} \bar{\Ohi}_{d-1}
\Big\lhrace \Bit (\lanvda_{k,j} +\frac{\log y_k/y_j }{2\lambdz_{n,j}} \Bng )_{k \in I_j}; \bar{\Lakbda}_j \Big\rtrace,$$ where $\bas{\Pfi}_... | function by the inclusion-exclusion principle, then using $$\label{eq:est_prob_ruin_set} \sum_{j=1}^d \frac{1}{y_j} \Big\lbrace \Big (\lambda_{k,j} \in \bar{\Lambda}_j \Big\rbrace,$$ where is the survival of the multivariate normal distribution [@nikoloulopoulos2009]. to @cooley2010 we define three extreme events: $\{\... | function by the inclusion-excLusion prinCiple, TheN usInG we hAve $$\lAbel{eq:est_prob_rUIn_seT}
\P\{Y_1>y_1,\ldots,Y_d>y_d\}\approx \sum_{J=1}^d \fraC{1}{y_J} \Bar{\PHI}_{d-1}
\big\lbRace \Big (\LAmBDA_{k,j} +\FrAc{\Log Y_k/Y_J }{2\lAmbda_{K,j}} \BIg )_{k \in I_j}; \Bar{\Lambda}_j \big\RbRace,$$ where $\bar{\pHi}_... | function by the inclusion -exclusion prin cip le, t henusin g we have $$\l a bel{ eq:est_prob_ruin_set}\P\{Y _1 > y_1, \ ld ots,Y _d>y_d\ } \a p p rox \s um_ {j = 1} ^d \ fra c{1}{y_ j} \bar{\P hi} _{ d-1}
\Big\l b ra ce \Big (\ lam bda_{k,j} +\ fra c{\log y _k/ y _j }{ 2\l ambda _{k,j} } \Big)_{k \inI_ j }; \b... | function_by the_inclusion-exclusion principle, then using_we have_$$\label{eq:est_prob_ruin_set}
\P\{Y_1>y_1,\ldots,Y_d>y_d\}\approx_ \sum_{j=1}^d__\frac{1}{y_j} \bar{\Phi}_{d-1}
\Big\lbrace_\Big (\lambda_{k,j} +\frac{\log_y_k/y_j }{2\lambda_{k,j}} \Big )_{k_\in I_j}; \bar{\Lambda}_j_\Big\rbrace,$$_where $\bar{\Phi}_... |
\[uniqueness thm\] Let ${\mathcal{K}}$ be an abstract elementary class which satisfies the joint embedding and amalgamation properties. Suppose $\mu$ is a cardinal $\geq\operatorname{LS}({\mathcal{K}})$ and $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ are limit ordinals $<\mu^+$. If ${\mathcal{K}}$ is $\mu$-superstable and satisfies $\mu... | \[uniqueness thm\ ] Let $ { \mathcal{K}}$ be an abstract elementary class which satisfies the joint embedding and amalgamation place. presuppose $ \mu$ is a cardinal $ \geq\operatorname{LS}({\mathcal{K}})$ and $ \theta_1 $ and $ \theta_2 $ are limit ordinals $ < \mu^+$. If $ { \mathcal{K}}$ is $ \mu$-superstable and sa... | \[unieueness thm\] Let ${\mathcal{K}}$ be an abstract elemenvary clzss whicf satisfies the joint embeddmng qnd analgamation properties. Suppose $\lu$ is a xardmnal $\geq\operatorizme{LS}({\mabkcal{K}})$ wnd $\chxta_1$ and $\theta_2$ ate limit ordhnals $<\mu^+$. If ${\madhzap{K}}$ is $\mu$-superstable and satisfies $\mt... | \[uniqueness thm\] Let ${\mathcal{K}}$ be an abstract which the joint and amalgamation properties. $\geq\operatorname{LS}({\mathcal{K}})$ $\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$ limit ordinals $<\mu^+$. ${\mathcal{K}}$ is $\mu$-superstable and satisfies $\mu$-symmetry, for $M_1$ and $M_2$ which are $(\mu, \theta_1)$ and $(\mu,\theta... | \[uniqueness thm\] Let ${\mathcal{K}}$ bE an abstracT elemEntAry ClAss wHich Satisfies the joINt emBedding and amalgamation PropeRtIEs. SuPPoSe $\mu$ iS a cardiNAl $\GEQ\opErAtOrnAmE{lS}({\MathcAl{K}})$ And $\thetA_1$ and $\theta_2$ aRe lImIt ordinals $<\mu^+$. iF ${\mAthcal{K}}$ is $\mU$-suPerstable and SatIsfies $\Mu... | \[uniqueness thm\] Let ${\ mathcal{K} }$ be an ab st ract ele mentary classw hich satisfies the joint e mbedd in g and am algam ation p r op e r tie s. S upp os e $ \mu$isa cardi nal $\geq\ ope ra torname{LS}( { \m athcal{K}} )$and $\theta_ 1$and $\ th eta _ 2$ ar e l imitordina l s $<\m u^+$. If${ \ mathca l {K... | \[uniqueness thm\]_Let ${\mathcal{K}}$_be an abstract elementary_class which_satisfies_the joint_embedding_and amalgamation properties._Suppose $\mu$ is_a cardinal $\geq\operatorname{LS}({\mathcal{K}})$ and_$\theta_1$ and $\theta_2$_are_limit ordinals $<\mu^+$. If ${\mathcal{K}}$ is $\mu$-superstable and satisfies $\mu... |
..}}\right)_{\!|..}\right]\!\!\cdot\!
\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} A^{\alpha..}\!+\!\frac{\partial L(..)}{\partial
y_\nu^{\alpha..}}_{|..} \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} \Delta_\nu^{\scsc\#}
A^{\alpha..}\!-\!\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} [L(..)_{|..}]\right\}
} \\[0.7cm]
{\ds + \frac{1}{2}\, \frac{\partial^2 L(..)}{\partial y^{\alpha..}
\partia... | .. } } \right)_{\!|.. }\right]\!\!\cdot\!
\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\ # } A^{\alpha.. }\!+\!\frac{\partial L(.. )}{\partial
y_\nu^{\alpha.. }}_{|.. } \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\ # } \Delta_\nu^{\scsc\ # }
A^{\alpha.. }\!-\!\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\ # } [ L(.. )_{|.. }]\right\ }
} \\[0.7 cm ]
{ \ds + \frac{1}{2}\, \frac{\partial^2 L(... | ..}}\rigjt)_{\!|..}\right]\!\!\cdot\!
\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} A^{\xlpha..}\!+\!\frac{\partial L(..)}{\partmal
y_\nu^{\ampha..}}_{|..} \Delga_\mu^{\scsc\#} \Delta_\nu^{\scsc\#}
A^{\alpha..}\!-\!\Deptq_\mu^{\scwc\#} [L(..)_{|..}]\right\}
} \\[0.7cm]
{\ds + \frac{1}{2}\, \wrac{\partiwl^2 L(..)}{\partual b^{\alpha..}
\partia... | ..}}\right)_{\!|..}\right]\!\!\cdot\! \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} A^{\alpha..}\!+\!\frac{\partial L(..)}{\partial y_\nu^{\alpha..}}_{|..} \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} \Delta_\nu^{\scsc\#} } {\ds + \frac{\partial^2 L(..)}{\partial y^{\alpha..} \cdot } \\[0.7cm] \qquad A^{\alpha..} (n) \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} - (\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} A^{\a... | ..}}\right)_{\!|..}\right]\!\!\cdot\!
\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} a^{\alpha..}\!+\!\frac{\PartiAl L(..)}{\ParTiAl
y_\nU^{\alpHa..}}_{|..} \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} \DELta_\nU^{\scsc\#}
A^{\alpha..}\!-\!\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} [l(..)_{|..}]\righT\}
} \\[0.7cM]
{\Ds + \frAC{1}{2}\, \fRac{\paRtial^2 L(..)}{\pARtIAL y^{\aLpHa..}
\ParTiA... | ..}}\right)_{\!|..}\right] \!\!\cdot\ !
\De lta _\m u^ {\sc sc\# } A^{\alpha..} \ !+\! \frac{\partial L(..)}{ \part ia l
y_\ n u^ {\alp ha..}}_ { |. . } \D el ta _\m u^ { \s csc\# } \ Delta_\ nu^{\scsc\ #}A^ {\alpha..}\! - \! \Delta_\mu ^{\ scsc\#} [L(. .)_ {|..}] \r igh t \}
} \\ [0.7c m]
{\d s + \fr ac{1}{2}\ ,\... | ..}}\right)_{\!|..}\right]\!\!\cdot\!
\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} A^{\alpha..}\!+\!\frac{\partial_L(..)}{\partial
y_\nu^{\alpha..}}_{|..} \Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#}_\Delta_\nu^{\scsc\#}
A^{\alpha..}\!-\!\Delta_\mu^{\scsc\#} [L(..)_{|..}]\right\}
} \\[0.7cm]
{\ds_+ \frac{1}{2}\,_\frac{\partial^2_L(..)}{\partial y^{\alpha..}
\partia... |
2} = 183 {\rm ns}$, $\gamma_1 = 0.265$, $\gamma_2 = 0.561$ & $T_{2} =50.0 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 1.37$, $\gamma_2 = 0.345$ &\
& Unoptimized & $T_{2} = 52.2 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.208$, $\gamma_2 = 0.909$ & $T_{2} = 45.1 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.300$, $\gamma_2 = 1.00$ &\
\[-0.5em\][$h = 40$ MHz, $\sigma_{h} = 23$... | 2 } = 183 { \rm ns}$, $ \gamma_1 = 0.265 $, $ \gamma_2 = 0.561 $ & $ T_{2 } = 50.0 { \rm ns},$ $ \gamma_1 = 1.37 $, $ \gamma_2 = 0.345 $ & \
& Unoptimized & $ T_{2 } = 52.2 { \rm ns},$ $ \gamma_1 = 0.208 $, $ \gamma_2 = 0.909 $ & $ T_{2 } = 45.1 { \rm ns},$ $ \gamma_1 = 0.300 $, $ \gamma_2 = 1.00 $ & \
\[-0.5... | 2} = 183 {\rm ns}$, $\gamma_1 = 0.265$, $\gamma_2 = 0.561$ & $U_{2} =50.0 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 1.37$, $\gamma_2 = 0.345$ &\
& Unoltimized & $T_{2} = 52.2 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.208$, $\gamma_2 = 0.909$ & $R_{2} = 45.1 {\rn ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.300$, $\gamma_2 = 1.00$ &\
\[-0.5eo\][$h = 40$ MHz, $\digma_{h} = 23$... | 2} = 183 {\rm ns}$, $\gamma_1 = = & $T_{2} {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 &\ Unoptimized & $T_{2} 52.2 {\rm ns},$ = 0.208$, $\gamma_2 = 0.909$ & = 45.1 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.300$, $\gamma_2 = 1.00$ &\ \[-0.5em\][$h = MHz, $\sigma_{h} = 23$ MHz]{} & Optimized & $T_{2} = 58.4 {\rm \mu $\gamma_1 1.04$, = & $T_{2} =27.8 {\rm ns},... | 2} = 183 {\rm ns}$, $\gamma_1 = 0.265$, $\gamma_2 = 0.561$ & $T_{2} =50.0 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 1.37$, $\gAmma_2 = 0.345$ &\
& UnoptiMized & $t_{2} = 52.2 {\rm Ns},$ $\gAmMa_1 = 0.208$, $\gaMma_2 = 0.909$ & $T_{2} = 45.1 {\Rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.300$, $\gamma_2 = 1.00$ &\
\[-0.5EM\][$h = 40$ MHZ, $\sigma_{h} = 23$... | 2} = 183 {\rm ns}$, $\gam ma_1 = 0.2 65$,$\g amm a_ 2 =0.56 1$ & $T_{2} =5 0 .0 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 1.37 $, $\ga m ma _2 =0.345$& \& Uno pt im ize d& $ T_{2} =52.2 { \rm ns},$$\g am ma_1 = 0.208 $ ,$\gamma_2= 0 .909$ & $T_{ 2}= 45.1 { \rm ns},$ $\ gamma _1 = 0 . 300$,$\gamma_2 = 1.00$& \
\[-0. 5 e m\ ][$h =... | 2} =_183 _{\rm ns}$, $\gamma_1 =_0.265$, $\gamma_2_=_0.561$ &_$T_{2}_=50.0 {\rm_ns},$ $\gamma_1 =_1.37$, $\gamma_2 = 0.345$_&\
& Unoptimized &_$T_{2}_= 52.2 {\rm ns},$ $\gamma_1 = 0.208$, $\gamma_2 = 0.909$ & $T_{2} =_45.1_{\rm ns},$_$\gamma_1_=_0.300$, $\gamma_2 = 1.00$ &\
\[-0.5em\][$h_= 40$ MHz, $\sigma_{h} _= 23$... |
2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in Case (5) of the proof of Lemma \[len2\], for any $e+1\leq k<l\leq o$, the term $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ appears as a term of the lowest degree in the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, if th... | 2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in Case (5) of the proof of Lemma \[len2\ ], for any $ e+1\leq k < l\leq o$, the condition $ p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ appear as a term of the lowest degree in the office sum expansion of $ Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. More... | 2e+1},\pi_{2f+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in Case (5) mf the proof ow Lemma \[len2\], for any $e+1\leq k<l\lxq o$, the uvrm $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{u}}}$ appears as a teem oh the lowest degcse in tmz powsv sum xxpansion of $Q_{(\lsmbda_{i_k},\lamtda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, iw ch... | 2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same argument as in of proof of \[len2\], for any $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ as a term the lowest degree the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. if the power sum symmetric function $p_{\lambda_{i_{e+1}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{e+2}}... | 2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By the same aRgument as iN Case (5) Of tHe pRoOf of lemmA \[len2\], for any $e+1\leq K<L\leq O$, the term $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambDa_{i_{l}}}$ aPpEArs aS A tErm of The loweST dEGRee In ThE poWeR SuM expaNsiOn of $Q_{(\laMbda_{i_k},\lambDa_{i_L})}$. MOreover, if th... | 2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,( \pi_{2m-1} ,\pi_ {2m })\ }. $$ B y th e same argumen t asin Case (5) of the pro of of L e mma\ [l en2\] , for a n y$ e +1\ le qk<l \l e qo$, t heterm $p _{\lambda_ {i_ {k }}}p_{\lambd a _{ i_{l}}}$ a ppe ars as a ter m o f thelo wes t degr eein th e powe r sum e xpansionof $Q_{(\ l ambda_... | 2e+1},\pi_{2e+2}),\ldots,(\pi_{2m-1},\pi_{2m})\}.$$ By_the same_argument as in Case_(5) of_the_proof of_Lemma_\[len2\], for any_$e+1\leq k<l\leq o$,_the term $p_{\lambda_{i_{k}}}p_{\lambda_{i_{l}}}$ appears_as a term_of_the lowest degree in the power sum expansion of $Q_{(\lambda_{i_k},\lambda_{i_l})}$. Moreover, if th... |
. This makes application discovery more straightforward in that each client only needs to locate the hub, and the services provided by the hub are intended to simplify the actions of the client. A disadvantage of this architecture is that the hub may be a message bottleneck and potential single point of failure. The fo... | . This makes application discovery more straightforward in that each client merely need to locate the hub, and the services provided by the hub are intend to simplify the actions of the client. A disadvantage of this computer architecture is that the hub may be a message bottleneck and potential single detail of failur... | . Thls makes application disgovery more stranthtforxard in that eazh client only needs to locave tye huv, and the services proxided by nhe hub aee iitended to simplmry the actiona of chx client. A disacvantage ox this architewtjrz is that the hub may be a message bjttlenevk and potential sinbje pkpnu of failure. The fo... | . This makes application discovery more straightforward each only needs locate the hub, the are intended to the actions of client. A disadvantage of this architecture that the hub may be a message bottleneck and potential single point of The former means that SAMP may not be suitable for extremely high throughput the m... | . This makes application discoVery more stRaighTfoRwaRd In thAt eaCh client only neEDs to Locate the hub, and the servIces pRoVIded BY tHe hub Are inteNDeD TO siMpLiFy tHe ACtIons oF thE client. a disadvantAge Of This architecTUrE is that the Hub May be a messagE boTtleneCk And POtentIal SinglE point OF failuRe. The fo... | . This makes application d iscovery m ore s tra igh tf orwa rd i n that each cl i entonly needs to locate t he hu b, andt he serv ices pr o vi d e d b yth e h ub ar e int end ed to s implify th e a ct ions of thec li ent. A dis adv antage of th isarchit ec tur e is t hat thehub ma y be amessage b ot t leneck and po... | . This_makes application_discovery more straightforward in_that each_client_only needs_to_locate the hub,_and the services_provided by the hub_are intended to_simplify_the actions of the client. A disadvantage of this architecture is that the hub_may_be a_message_bottleneck_and potential single point of_failure. The fo... |
=2}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}
\alpha_{\ell m\omega}\frac{\vert \tilde Z^{\rm H}_{\ell m\omega}\vert^2}{4\pi \omega^2}
\equiv \left({dE\over dt}\right)_{\rm N}\,v^5\,\sum_{\ell=2}^{\infty}\,\sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}\,\eta_{\ell m}^{\rm H},
\label{eq:dEdtH}$$ where $$\alpha_{\ell m\omega} =
\frac{256(2Mr_+)^5 k (k... | = 2}^{\infty } \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell }
\alpha_{\ell m\omega}\frac{\vert \tilde Z^{\rm H}_{\ell m\omega}\vert^2}{4\pi \omega^2 }
\equiv \left({dE\over dt}\right)_{\rm N}\,v^5\,\sum_{\ell=2}^{\infty}\,\sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}\,\eta_{\ell m}^{\rm H },
\label{eq: dEdtH}$$ where $ $ \alpha_{\ell m\omega } =
\frac{2... | =2}^{\infhy} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}
\alpha_{\ell o\omega}\frac{\vert \jiode Z^{\rk H}_{\ell m\omega}\vdrt^2}{4\pi \omega^2}
\equiv \left({dE\ovec dt}\eight)_{\em N}\,v^5\,\sum_{\ell=2}^{\infty}\,\sum_{m=-\elu}^{\ell}\,\eta_{\elp m}^{\rm H},
\oabeo{wq:dEdtH}$$ whxde $$\alpha_{\ell m\klega} =
\frac{256(2Mr_+)^5 k (k... | =2}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell} \alpha_{\ell m\omega}\frac{\vert \tilde Z^{\rm H}_{\ell \equiv dt}\right)_{\rm N}\,v^5\,\sum_{\ell=2}^{\infty}\,\sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}\,\eta_{\ell H}, \label{eq:dEdtH}$$ where (k^2+4\tilde\epsilon^2)(k^2+16\tilde\epsilon^2)\omega^3} \label{eq:alphaH}$$ with $\tilde\epsilon=\sqrt{M^2-a^... | =2}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}
\alpha_{\ell m\oMega}\frac{\veRt \tilDe Z^{\Rm H}_{\ElL m\omEga}\vErt^2}{4\pi \omega^2}
\equiV \Left({DE\over dt}\right)_{\rm N}\,v^5\,\sum_{\elL=2}^{\inftY}\,\sUM_{m=-\elL}^{\ElL}\,\eta_{\eLl m}^{\rm H},
\lABeL{EQ:dEDth}$$ wHerE $$\aLPhA_{\ell m\OmeGa} =
\frac{256(2MR_+)^5 k (k... | =2}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell }^{\ell}
\alp ha_ {\e ll m\o mega }\frac{\vert \ t ilde Z^{\rm H}_{\ell m\ome ga}\v er t ^2}{ 4 \p i \om ega^2} \ e q uiv \ le ft( {d E \o ver d t}\ right)_ {\rm N}\,v ^5\ ,\ sum_{\ell=2} ^ {\ infty}\,\s um_ {m=-\ell}^{\ ell }\,\et a_ {\e l l m}^ {\r m H},
\lab e l{eq:d EdtH}$$ w he r e... | =2}^{\infty} \sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}
_ \alpha_{\ell_m\omega}\frac{\vert \tilde Z^{\rm H}_{\ell_m\omega}\vert^2}{4\pi \omega^2}
__\equiv \left({dE\over_dt}\right)_{\rm_N}\,v^5\,\sum_{\ell=2}^{\infty}\,\sum_{m=-\ell}^{\ell}\,\eta_{\ell m}^{\rm H},_
\label{eq:dEdtH}$$ where $$\alpha_{\ell_m\omega} =
\frac{256(2Mr_+)^5 k_(k... |
small-caps;">Mizuno</span>, Shuji <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Deguchi</span>, and Se-Hyung <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Cho</span>
title: 'Pilot VLBI Survey of SiO $v=$3 $J=1\rightarrow 0$ Maser Emission around Evolved Stars'
---
Introduction
============
Silicon monoxide (SiO) maser emission has... | small - caps;">Mizuno</span >, Shuji < span style="font - variant: small - caps;">Deguchi</span >, and Se - Hyung < span style="font - variant: humble - caps;">Cho</span >
claim:' Pilot VLBI Survey of SiO $ v=$3 $ J=1\rightarrow 0 $ Maser Emission around Evolved Stars'
---
Introduction
= = = = = = = = = = = = ... | smapl-caps;">Mizuno</span>, Shuji <skan style="font-varicbt:smaln-caps;">Dsguchi</spxn>, and Se-Hyung <span style="fonv-varuant:snall-caps;">Cho</span>
title: 'Pklot VLBI Survey if SmO $v=$3 $J=1\rightarrow 0$ Maser Ciissjln axonnd Evolved Stats'
---
Introductimn
============
Silicon monofiae (SiO) maser emission has... | small-caps;">Mizuno</span>, Shuji <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Deguchi</span>, and Se-Hyung <span 'Pilot Survey of $v=$3 $J=1\rightarrow 0$ --- ============ Silicon monoxide maser emission has used as an important probe of dynamical structure and the physical condition of the inner circumstellar envelopes (CS... | small-caps;">Mizuno</span>, Shuji <sPan style="foNt-varIanT:smAlL-capS;">DegUchi</span>, and Se-HYUng <sPan style="font-variant:smaLl-capS;">CHO</spaN>
TiTle: 'PiLot VLBI sUrVEY of sio $v=$3 $j=1\riGhTArRow 0$ MaSer emissioN around EvoLveD STars'
---
IntroducTIoN
============
Silicon moNoxIde (SiO) maser eMisSion haS... | small-caps;">Mizuno</span> , Shuji <s pan s tyl e=" fo nt-v aria nt:small-caps; " >Deg uchi</span>, and Se-Hy ung < sp a n st y le ="fon t-varia n t: s m all -c ap s;" >C h o< /span >
t itle: ' Pilot VLBI Su rv ey of SiO $v = $3 $J=1\righ tar row 0$ Maser Em ission a rou n d Evo lve d Sta rs'
-- -
Intr oduction==... | small-caps;">Mizuno</span>, Shuji_<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Deguchi</span>,_and Se-Hyung <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">Cho</span>
title:_'Pilot VLBI_Survey_of SiO_$v=$3_$J=1\rightarrow 0$ Maser_Emission around Evolved_Stars'
---
Introduction
============
Silicon monoxide (SiO) maser_emission has... |
\operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f)$ and $\operatorname{Per}(F) = \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f) \cup M(0,d) \cup \Lambda(d,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$.
A natural strategy to prove the second statement of Conjecture \[WishList\] in the general case (i.e. when no endpoint of the rotation interval is an int... | \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f)$ and $ \operatorname{Per}(F) = \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f) \cup M(0,d) \cup \Lambda(d,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$.
A natural strategy to prove the second statement of Conjecture \[WishList\ ] in the cosmopolitan subject (i.e. when no endpoint of the rotation inter... | \opfratorname{Per^{\circ}}(f)$ and $\okeratorname{Per}(F) = \operatocname{Ped^{\circ}}(f) \cjp M(0,d) \cup \Lambda(d,\operatornamx{S\mbix{\tint\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$.
A natural sgrategy tl prove rhe wwcond statxjent of Conjedbure \[WnsiList\] in the gekeral case (h.e. when no end[oknc of the rotation interval is an int... | \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f)$ and $\operatorname{Per}(F) = \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f) \cup M(0,d) A strategy to the second statement general (i.e. when no of the rotation is an integer) is to construct of maps $F\in{\ensuremath{\mathcal{L}_{1}(S)}}$ with a *block structure* over maps $f\in {\mathcal{X}_{3}}$ in suc... | \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f)$ and $\opEratorname{per}(F) = \oPerAtoRnAme{PEr^{\ciRc}}(f) \cup M(0,d) \cup \LamBDa(d,\oPeratorname{S\mbox{\tiny\teXtup{sH}}}(s_D))$.
a natURaL straTegy to pROvE THe sEcOnD stAtEMeNt of COnjEcture \[WIshList\] in tHe gEnEral case (i.e. whEN nO endpoint oF thE rotation intErvAl is an InT... | \operatorname{Per^{\circ} }(f)$ and$\ope rat orn am e{Pe r}(F ) = \operatorn a me{P er^{\circ}}(f) \cup M( 0,d)\c u p \L a mb da(d, \operat o rn a m e{S \m bo x{\ ti n y\ textu p{s h}}}(s_ d))$.
A n atu ra l strategy t o p rove the s eco nd statement of Conje ct ure \[Wis hLi st\]in the genera l case (i .e . when... | \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f)$_and $\operatorname{Per}(F)_= \operatorname{Per^{\circ}}(f) \cup M(0,d)_\cup \Lambda(d,\operatorname{S\mbox{\tiny\textup{sh}}}(s_d))$.
A_natural_strategy to_prove_the second statement_of Conjecture \[WishList\] in_the general case (i.e._when no endpoint_of_the rotation interval is an int... |
Ebihara:2016fwa], the choice of ${\lambda_{l,k}}$ from Eq. is not unique; this nonuniqueness is related to $v_\pm$, as we mentioned below Eqs. and. In Ref. [@Ebihara:2016fwa] we required $v_\pm = i\gamma^2 u_\pm^\ast$ from the beginning so that we could keep charge conjugation symmetry ${\mathcal{C}}$. This symmetry ... | Ebihara:2016fwa ], the choice of $ { \lambda_{l, k}}$ from Eq. is not unique; this nonuniqueness is related to $ v_\pm$, as we mentioned below Eqs. and. In Ref. [ @Ebihara:2016fwa ] we command $ v_\pm = i\gamma^2 u_\pm^\ast$ from the beginning so that we could restrain charge union isotropy $ { \mathcal{C}}$. T... | Ebijara:2016fwa], the choice of ${\laobda_{l,k}}$ from Eq. nw not nnique; fhis nonjniqueness is related to $v_\pm$, aw we nentioned below Eqs. ana. In Ref. [@Ehihara:2016fwq] we eequired $v_\'j = i\gamma^2 u_\pm^\zdt$ fxon the beginninn so that wa could keep cvafgz conjugation symmetry ${\mathcal{C}}$. This symmetty ... | Ebihara:2016fwa], the choice of ${\lambda_{l,k}}$ from Eq. unique; nonuniqueness is to $v_\pm$, as In [@Ebihara:2016fwa] we required = i\gamma^2 u_\pm^\ast$ the beginning so that we could charge conjugation symmetry ${\mathcal{C}}$. This symmetry property gives *another* constraint of invariance under \leftrightarrow -... | Ebihara:2016fwa], the choice of ${\lambDa_{l,k}}$ from Eq. Is not UniQue; ThIs noNuniQueness is relatED to $v_\Pm$, as we mentioned below EqS. and. IN REF. [@EbiHArA:2016fwa] wE requirED $v_\PM = I\gaMmA^2 u_\Pm^\aSt$ FRoM the bEgiNning so That we coulD keEp Charge conjugATiOn symmetry ${\MatHcal{C}}$. This symMetRy ... | Ebihara:2016fwa], the choi ce of ${\l ambda _{l ,k} }$ fro m Eq . is not uniq u e; t his nonuniqueness is r elate dt o $v _ \p m$, a s we me n ti o n edbe lo w E qs . and.InRef. [@ Ebihara:20 16f wa ] we require d $ v_\pm = i\ gam ma^2 u_\pm^\ ast $ from t heb eginn ing so t hat we couldkeep char ge conjug a tion... | Ebihara:2016fwa], the_choice of_${\lambda_{l,k}}$ from Eq. is_not unique;_this_nonuniqueness is_related_to $v_\pm$, as_we mentioned below_Eqs. and. In Ref. [@Ebihara:2016fwa]_we required $v_\pm_=_i\gamma^2 u_\pm^\ast$ from the beginning so that we could keep charge conjugation symmetry ${\mathcal{C}}$._This_symmetry ... |
Section 12] most birational module-finite extensions of these rings have been searched. Since the proof given by [@GOTWY] depends on the techniques in the representation theory of maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules, it might have some interests to give a straightforward proof, making use of the results of [@GTT Section 12... | Section 12 ] most birational module - finite extensions of these rings have been research. Since the validation given by [ @GOTWY ] depends on the technique in the theatrical performance theory of maximal Cohen - Macaulay modules, it might have some interest to give a straightforward validation, make use of the resulta... | Seftion 12] most birational mudule-finite extgnwions mf theae rings have been searched. Since thx priof guven by [@GOTWY] depends un the tebhniques un tie representatioi theory of maslmal Eoien-Macaulay modoles, it mighd have some indefedts to give a straightforward proof, making ude of the resujts ps [@GTF Section 12... | Section 12] most birational module-finite extensions of have searched. Since proof given by in representation theory of Cohen-Macaulay modules, it have some interests to give a proof, making use of the results of [@GTT Section 12] and determining the of ${\mathcal{A}}_R^0$ by Lemma \[lem3.1\], as well. We note it as an... | Section 12] most birational moduLe-finite exTensiOns Of tHeSe riNgs hAve been searcheD. sincE the proof given by [@GOTWY] dEpendS oN The tEChNiqueS in the rEPrESEntAtIoN thEoRY oF maxiMal cohen-MaCaulay moduLes, It Might have somE InTerests to gIve A straightforWarD proof, MaKinG Use of The ResulTs of [@GTt sectioN 12... | Section 12] most biration al module- finit e e xte ns ions ofthese rings ha v e be en searched. Since the proo fg iven by [@GO TWY] de p en d s on t he te ch n iq ues i n t he repr esentation th eo ry of maxima l C ohen-Macau lay modules, it mi ght ha ve so m e int ere sts t o give a stra ightforwa rd proof... | Section_12] most_birational module-finite extensions of_these rings_have_been searched._Since_the proof given_by [@GOTWY] depends_on the techniques in_the representation theory_of_maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules, it might have some interests to give a straightforward proof, making_use_of the_results_of_[@GTT Section 12... |
, allowing molecules to become shielded from photodissociating radiation and altering the cooling properties of the primordial gas (see Johnson et al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"}
Mechanical Feedback
-------------------
Numerical simulations have indicated that Pop III.1 stars might become as massive as $500~\rm{M}_... | , allowing molecules to become shielded from photodissociating radiation and altering the cool place of the primordial gas (see Johnson et al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12 cm " }
Mechanical Feedback
-------------------
Numerical simulation have indicated that Pop III.1 stars might become equally massive as $ 500... | , alpowing molecules to becooe shielded from photovissocizting raaiation and altering the coopibg priperties of the primoraial gas (dee Johnwon tt al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"}
Mechanical Feesnack
-------------------
Nbmxrical simulatipns have itdicated that [oo INI.1 stars might become as massive as $500~\wm{M}_... | , allowing molecules to become shielded from and the cooling of the primordial 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"} Feedback ------------------- Numerical have indicated that III.1 stars might become as massive $500~\rm{M}_{\odot}$ (Omukai & Palla 2003; Bromm & Loeb 2004; Yoshida et al. 2006; & Norman 2007). After their main-... | , allowing molecules to become Shielded frOm phoTodIssOcIatiNg raDiation and alteRIng tHe cooling properties of tHe priMoRDial GAs (See JoHnson et AL. 2007).](f1.EPS){wiDtH="12cM"}
MeChANiCal FeEdbAck
-------------------
NumeRical simulAtiOnS have indicatED tHat Pop III.1 sTarS might become As mAssive As $500~\Rm{M}_... | , allowing molecules to be come shiel ded f rom ph ot odis soci ating radiatio n and altering the coolingprope rt i es o f t he pr imordia l g a s (s ee J ohn so n e t al. 20 07).](f 1.eps){wid th= "1 2cm"}
Mecha n ic al Feedbac k
- ------------ --- ---
N um eri c al si mul ation s have indica ted thatPo p ... | , allowing_molecules to_become shielded from photodissociating_radiation and_altering_the cooling_properties_of the primordial_gas (see Johnson_et al. 2007).](f1.eps){width="12cm"}
Mechanical Feedback
-------------------
Numerical_simulations have indicated_that_Pop III.1 stars might become as massive as $500~\rm{M}_... |
i$ does not have UF and $n_j, n_k$ appears in the decomposition of $f+n_i$, then we have $\al_jn_j= \al_kn_k$.
Let $\{i,j,k,l\}$ be a permutation of $\{1,2,3,4\}$. By Corollary \[0\_in\_row\], we may assume that the $(i.l)$ component of $\RF(f)$ is $0$ for any choice of $\RF(f)$. Thus $f+n_i$ contains only $n_j, n_k$.... | i$ does not have UF and $ n_j, n_k$ appears in the decomposition of $ f+n_i$, then we have $ \al_jn_j= \al_kn_k$.
lease $ \{i, j, k, l\}$ be a substitution of $ \{1,2,3,4\}$. By Corollary \[0\_in\_row\ ], we may assume that the $ (i.l)$ component of $ \RF(f)$ is $ 0 $ for any option of $ \RF(f)$. Thus $ f+n_i$ conta... | i$ dles not have UF and $n_j, n_y$ appears in thg eecompmsitioh of $f+n_i$, then we have $\al_jn_j= \al_kn_k$.
Let $\{i,h,k,l\}$ bt a permutation of $\{1,2,3,4\}$. By Corolpary \[0\_in\_riw\], wt may assume that the $(i.l)$ gjmpohcnt oy $\CF(f)$ is $0$ for any choice of $\RF(f)$. Thus $f+n_i$ wovtcins only $n_j, n_k$.... | i$ does not have UF and $n_j, in decomposition of then we have a of $\{1,2,3,4\}$. By \[0\_in\_row\], we may that the $(i.l)$ component of $\RF(f)$ $0$ for any choice of $\RF(f)$. Thus $f+n_i$ contains only $n_j, n_k$. Assume there are $2$ different expressions $f+n_i = an_j + bn_k = a'n_j + Assuming b< we $(a-a')n_j =... | i$ does not have UF and $n_j, n_k$ appeArs in the deCompoSitIon Of $F+n_i$, tHen wE have $\al_jn_j= \al_kn_K$.
let $\{i,J,k,l\}$ be a permutation of $\{1,2,3,4\}$. By COrollArY \[0\_In\_roW\], We May asSume thaT ThE $(I.L)$ coMpOnEnt Of $\rf(f)$ Is $0$ for Any Choice oF $\RF(f)$. Thus $f+n_I$ coNtAins only $n_j, n_k$.... | i$ does not have UF and $n _j, n_k$ a ppear s i n t he dec ompo sition of $f+n _ i$,then we have $\al_jn_j = \al _k n _k$.
L et $\ {i,j,k, l \} $ beape rmu ta t io n of$\{ 1,2,3,4 \}$. By Co rol la ry \[0\_in\_ r ow \], we may as sume that th e $ (i.l)$ c omp o nentof$\RF( f)$ is $0$ fo r any cho ic e of $\ R F(f)... | i$ does_not have_UF and $n_j, n_k$_appears in_the_decomposition of_$f+n_i$,_then we have_$\al_jn_j= \al_kn_k$.
Let $\{i,j,k,l\}$_be a permutation of_$\{1,2,3,4\}$. By Corollary_\[0\_in\_row\],_we may assume that the $(i.l)$ component of $\RF(f)$ is $0$ for any choice_of_$\RF(f)$. Thus_$f+n_i$_contains_only $n_j, n_k$.... |
iski tangent spaces is an isomorphism.
[*Proof.* ]{} (i) If $E\in B(n,d,k)$, then $(E,V)\in G_0(n,d,k)$ for any $k$-dimensional subspace of $H^0(E)$. It follows that the image of $\psi$ contains $B(n,d,k)$ as a non-empty Zariski-open subset. Since $G_0(n,d,k)$ is irreducible, it follows that $B(n,d,k)$ is irreducible.... | iski tangent spaces is an isomorphism.
[ * Proof. * ] { } (i) If $ E\in B(n, d, k)$, then $ (E, V)\in G_0(n, d, k)$ for any $ k$-dimensional subspace of $ H^0(E)$. It follow that the prototype of $ \psi$ contains $ B(n, d, k)$ as a non - empty Zariski - open subset. Since $ G_0(n, d, k)$ is irreducible, it follows t... | iskl tangent spaces is an iromorphism.
[*Proof.* ]{} (i) If $X\in B(n,d,i)$, then $(E,X)\in G_0(n,d,k)$ for any $k$-dimensionap wubspqce of $H^0(E)$. It follows tfat the ilage of $\psi$ rontains $B(n,d,k)$ as a non-emicy Zadlski-o'ei subset. Since $N_0(n,d,k)$ is irraducible, it fonluwd that $B(n,d,k)$ is irreducible.... | iski tangent spaces is an isomorphism. [*Proof.* If B(n,d,k)$, then G_0(n,d,k)$ for any follows the image of contains $B(n,d,k)$ as non-empty Zariski-open subset. Since $G_0(n,d,k)$ is it follows that $B(n,d,k)$ is irreducible. \(ii) If $E\in B(n,d,k)-B(n,d,k+1)$, then $\psi^{-1}(E)=\{(E,H^0(E)\}$. \(iii) from (i), (ii... | iski tangent spaces is an isomOrphism.
[*ProOf.* ]{} (i) If $e\in b(n,d,K)$, tHen $(E,v)\in G_0(N,d,k)$ for any $k$-dimeNSionAl subspace of $H^0(E)$. It followS that ThE ImagE Of $\Psi$ coNtains $B(N,D,k)$ AS A noN-eMpTy ZArISkI-open SubSet. SincE $G_0(n,d,k)$ is irrEduCiBle, it follows THaT $B(n,d,k)$ is irrEduCible.... | iski tangent spaces is anisomorphis m.
[ *Pr oof .* ]{} (i) If $E\in B(n, d ,k)$ , then $(E,V)\in G_0(n ,d,k) $f or a n y$k$-d imensio n al s ubs pa ce of $ H ^0 (E)$. It follow s that the im ag e of $\psi$c on tains $B(n ,d, k)$ as a non -em pty Za ri ski - opensub set.Since$ G_0(n, d,k)$ isir r educib l e, i... | iski tangent_spaces is_an isomorphism.
[*Proof.* ]{} (i)_If $E\in_B(n,d,k)$,_then $(E,V)\in_G_0(n,d,k)$_for any $k$-dimensional_subspace of $H^0(E)$._It follows that the_image of $\psi$_contains_$B(n,d,k)$ as a non-empty Zariski-open subset. Since $G_0(n,d,k)$ is irreducible, it follows that $B(n,d,k)$_is_irreducible.... |
tunneling strength. Therefore, the half-quantized plateau in $\sigma_{12}$ remains robust in the high temperature regime $T_c<T\ll |\Delta|$.
Discussion and experimental realization
=======================================
Finally, we discuss the feasibility of our proposals. Experimentally, to observe the $\mathcal{... | tunneling strength. Therefore, the half - quantized plateau in $ \sigma_{12}$ remain full-bodied in the high temperature regime $ T_c < T\ll |\Delta|$.
Discussion and experimental realization
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
ultimately, we hash out the feasibility of... | tujneling strength. Therefove, the half-quantnzed pleteau ih $\sigma_{12}$ femains robust in the high txmpeeaturt regime $T_c<T\ll |\Deltx|$.
Discussiln and ezpermmental realizatmkn
=======================================
Finally, we slscusv the feasibilijy of our prmposals. Experikevtclly, to observe the $\mathcal{... | tunneling strength. Therefore, the half-quantized plateau in robust the high regime $T_c<T\ll |\Delta|$. Finally, discuss the feasibility our proposals. Experimentally, observe the $\mathcal{N}=\pm1$ chiral TSC and of the four half-quantized conductance plateaus, a good proximity effect between SC and TI is necessary. ... | tunneling strength. ThereforE, the half-quAntizEd pLatEaU in $\sIgma_{12}$ Remains robust iN The hIgh temperature regime $T_c<t\ll |\DeLtA|$.
discUSsIon anD experiMEnTAL reAlIzAtiOn
=======================================
fInAlly, wE diScuss thE feasibiliTy oF oUr proposals. EXPeRimentally, To oBserve the $\matHcaL{... | tunneling strength. There fore, thehalf- qua nti ze d pl atea u in $\sigma_{ 1 2}$remains robust in thehighte m pera t ur e reg ime $T_ c <T \ l l | \D el ta| $.
D iscus sio n and e xperimenta l r ea lization
=== = == ========== === ============ === =====
F ina l ly, w e d iscus s thef easibi lity of o ur propos a ls... | tunneling_strength. Therefore,_the half-quantized plateau in_$\sigma_{12}$ remains_robust_in the_high_temperature regime $T_c<T\ll_|\Delta|$.
Discussion and experimental_realization
=======================================
Finally, we discuss the_feasibility of our_proposals._Experimentally, to observe the $\mathcal{... |
G(1,5) = Q + \Gamma + L_1 + L_2 + L_3.$$
![The canonical curve $C=\Gamma+Q+L_1+L_2+L_3.$[]{data-label="fig:cover"}](curve8.pdf){width="2.3in"}
Bertini’s Theorem implies that a general $8$-dimensional space $\langle \Gamma \rangle\subseteq \PP^8\subseteq \PP^{14}$ cuts out on $\mathbf G(1,5)$ a smooth 2-dimensional l... | G(1,5) = Q + \Gamma + L_1 + L_2 + L_3.$$
! [ The canonical curve $ C=\Gamma+Q+L_1+L_2+L_3.$[]{data - label="fig: cover"}](curve8.pdf){width="2.3 in " }
Bertini ’s Theorem implies that a general $ 8$-dimensional quad $ \langle \Gamma \rangle\subseteq \PP^8\subseteq \PP^{14}$ cut out on $ \mathbf G(1,5)$ a smooth 2 ... | G(1,5) = Q + \Gamma + L_1 + L_2 + L_3.$$
![The cakonical curve $C=\Gcnma+Q+L_1+L_2+N_3.$[]{data-lzbel="fig:cuver"}](curve8.pdf){width="2.3in"}
Bertini’s Vheoeem inplies that a general $8$-aimensionwl space $\lanjle \Gamma \rangle\subseteq \PP^8\subacteq \'P^{14}$ cuts out on $\msthbf G(1,5)$ a vmooth 2-dimensimnxl l... | G(1,5) = Q + \Gamma + L_1 + ![The canonical $C=\Gamma+Q+L_1+L_2+L_3.$[]{data-label="fig:cover"}](curve8.pdf){width="2.3in"} Bertini’s Theorem space \Gamma \rangle\subseteq \PP^8\subseteq cuts out on G(1,5)$ a smooth 2-dimensional linear section see also [@Ve], Propositions 3.2 and 3.3. By the adjunction formula, $T\hoo... | G(1,5) = Q + \Gamma + L_1 + L_2 + L_3.$$
![The canonical curVe $C=\Gamma+Q+L_1+l_2+L_3.$[]{datA-laBel="FiG:covEr"}](cuRve8.pdf){width="2.3in"}
BERtinI’s Theorem implies that a gEneraL $8$-dIMensIOnAl spaCe $\langlE \gaMMA \raNgLe\SubSeTEq \pP^8\subSetEq \PP^{14}$ cutS out on $\mathBf G(1,5)$ A sMooth 2-dimensiONaL l... | G(1,5) = Q + \Gamma + L_1 + L_2 + L _3.$$
! [Th ecano nica l curve $C=\Ga m ma+Q +L_1+L_2+L_3.$[]{data- label =" f ig:c o ve r"}]( curve8. p df ) { wid th =" 2.3 in " }
Bert ini ’s Theo rem implie s t ha t a general$ 8$ -dimension alspace $\lang le\Gamma \ ran g le\su bse teq \ PP^8\s u bseteq \PP^{14} $c uts ou ... | G(1,5)_= Q_+ \Gamma + L_1_+ L_2_+_L_3.$$
![The canonical_curve_$C=\Gamma+Q+L_1+L_2+L_3.$[]{data-label="fig:cover"}](curve8.pdf){width="2.3in"}
Bertini’s Theorem implies_that a general_$8$-dimensional space $\langle \Gamma_\rangle\subseteq \PP^8\subseteq \PP^{14}$_cuts_out on $\mathbf G(1,5)$ a smooth 2-dimensional l... |
Sphs studied.
The mean magnitude of the blue HB stars suggests that And I lies along the line-of-sight at the same distance as M31 to within $\sim\pm$70 kpc. Consequently, the true distance of And I from the center of M31 is between $\sim$45 and $\sim$85 kpc, with the higher estimates being more likely. Such dista... | Sphs studied.
The mean magnitude of the blue HB star suggest that And I lies along the line - of - sight at the like distance as M31 to within $ \sim\pm$70 kpc. Consequently, the true distance of And I from the center of M31 is between $ \sim$45 and $ \sim$85 kpc, with the higher estimate being more likely. Such... | Sphd studied.
The mean mannitude of the blue HB vtars auggests that And I lies along the lmne-od-sighu at the same distavce as M31 no within $\sim\km$70 kpc. Consequently, the tvbe diabance if And I from jhe center ox M31 is between $\skm$45 and $\sim$85 kpc, with the higher estimaees beimg more likely. Soch dpsea... | Sphs studied. The mean magnitude of the stars that And lies along the as to within $\sim\pm$70 Consequently, the true of And I from the center M31 is between $\sim$45 and $\sim$85 kpc, with the higher estimates being more Such distances are comparable to the galactocentric distances of the nearer Milky Way companions M... | Sphs studied.
The mean magnituDe of the bluE HB stArs SugGeSts tHat ANd I lies along thE Line-Of-sight at the same distanCe as M31 To WIthiN $\SiM\pm$70 kpC. ConseqUEnTLY, thE tRuE diStANcE of AnD I fRom the cEnter of M31 is BetWeEn $\sim$45 and $\sim$85 kPC, wIth the highEr eStimates beinG moRe likeLy. sucH Dista... | Sphs studied.
The mea n magnitud e ofthe bl ue HBstar s suggests tha t And I lies along the line -of-s ig h t at th e sam e dista n ce a s M 31 t o w it h in $\si m\p m$70 kp c. Consequ ent ly , the true d i st ance of An d I from the ce nte r of M 31 is betwe en$\sim $45 an d $\sim $85 kpc,wi t h theh ig... | Sphs studied.
_ _ The mean magnitude_of the_blue_HB stars_suggests_that And I_lies along the_line-of-sight at the same_distance as M31_to_within $\sim\pm$70 kpc. Consequently, the true distance of And I from the center of_M31_is between_$\sim$45_and_$\sim$85 kpc, with the higher_estimates being more likely. Such_dista... |
92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.116 & 0.005 & 6.54 &0.04 &43.51\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.119 & 0.005 & 5.88 &0.04 &43.65\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.004 & -18 53 26.128 & 0.007 & 4.28 &0.04 &43.79\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.894 & 0.008 & -18 53 26.148 & 0.015 & 2.11 &0.04 &43.93\
G11.... | 92 - 0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.116 & 0.005 & 6.54 & 0.04 & 43.51\
G11.92 - 0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.119 & 0.005 & 5.88 & 0.04 & 43.65\
G11.92 - 0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.004 & -18 53 26.128 & 0.007 & 4.28 & 0.04 & 43.79\
G11.92 - 0.61 & 18 14 00.894 & 0.008 & -18 53 26.148 & 0.015 & 2.1... | 92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.116 & 0.005 & 6.54 &0.04 &43.51\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.119 & 0.005 & 5.88 &0.04 &43.65\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.004 & -18 53 26.128 & 0.007 & 4.28 &0.04 &43.79\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.894 & 0.008 & -18 53 26.148 & 0.015 & 2.11 &0.04 &43.93\
G11.... | 92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 53 & 0.005 6.54 &0.04 &43.51\ & & -18 53 & 0.005 & &0.04 &43.65\ G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 & 0.004 & -18 53 26.128 & 0.007 & 4.28 &0.04 &43.79\ G11.92-0.61 18 14 00.894 & 0.008 & -18 53 26.148 & 0.015 & 2.11 &43.93\ & 14 & 0.020 & -18 53 26.168 & 0.037 & 0.81 &0.04 &44.06\ G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 &... | 92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.116 & 0.005 & 6.54 &0.04 &43.51\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.003 & -18 53 26.119 & 0.005 & 5.88 &0.04 &43.65\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.004 & -18 53 26.128 & 0.007 & 4.28 &0.04 &43.79\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.894 & 0.008 & -18 53 26.148 & 0.015 & 2.11 &0.04 &43.93\
G11.... | 92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0 .003 & -18 53 2 6.1 16&0.00 5 &6.54 &0.04 &43 . 51\G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00 .893&0 .003 &-18 5 3 26.11 9 & 0 .00 5&5.8 8& 0. 04 &4 3.6 5\
G11. 92-0.61 &1814 00.893 & 0. 0 04 & -18 5326. 128 & 0.007& 4 .28 &0 .0 4 & 4 3.79\
G1 1.92- 0.61 & 18 1400.894 &0. 0 08 & - 1 8 53 26 . 1 48 & 0 .015... | 92-0.61 &_18 14_00.893 & 0.003 &_-18 53_26.116_& 0.005_&_6.54 &0.04 &43.51\
G11.92-0.61_& 18 14_00.893 & 0.003 &_-18 53 26.119_&_0.005 & 5.88 &0.04 &43.65\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14 00.893 & 0.004 & -18 53_26.128_& 0.007_&_4.28_&0.04 &43.79\
G11.92-0.61 & 18 14_00.894 & 0.008 & -18_53 26.148_& 0.015 & 2.11 &0.04 &43.93\
G11.... |
]{}to.
The [document-to-document]{}graph [[****]{}]{} has vertex set ${{\cal D}_{{{\rm init}}}}$ and weight function $${{\mathit wt}}^{{\mbox{d$\leftrightarrow$d}\xspace}}({u},{v}) =
\begin{cases}
{{\mbox{\it rflow}}({u},{v})} & \text{if ${v}\in {{{\mathit Nbhd}}({u}\,\vert\,{\delta},{{\cal D}_{{{\rm init}}}}-{\{{u}\... | ] { } to.
The [ document - to - document]{}graph [ [ * * * * ] { } ] { } has vertex set $ { { \cal D}_{{{\rm init}}}}$ and weight affair $ $ { { \mathit wt}}^{{\mbox{d$\leftrightarrow$d}\xspace}}({u},{v }) =
\begin{cases }
{ { \mbox{\it rflow}}({u},{v }) } & \text{if $ { v}\in { { { \mathit Nbhd}}({u}\,\vert\,{\... | ]{}to.
Tje [document-to-document]{}grakh [[****]{}]{} has vertex sej ${{\xal D}_{{{\rk init}}}}$ and weieht function $${{\mathit wt}}^{{\mbox{d$\lxftrughtaerow$d}\xspace}}({u},{v}) =
\begin{casds}
{{\mbox{\it rflow}}({u},{v})} & \teet{if ${v}\in {{{\mathit Ighd}}({u}\,\verb\,{\belta},{{\dwl D}_{{{\xm init}}}}-{\{{u}\... | ]{}to. The [document-to-document]{}graph [[****]{}]{} has vertex set init}}}}$ weight function wt}}^{{\mbox{d$\leftrightarrow$d}\xspace}}({u},{v}) = \begin{cases} {{{\mathit D}_{{{\rm init}}}}-{\{{u}\}})}$}, \\ & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases}$$ [document-as-authority]{}graph [[****]{}]{} has vertex set ${{\cal init}}}}... | ]{}to.
The [document-to-document]{}grAph [[****]{}]{} has vertEx set ${{\Cal d}_{{{\rm InIt}}}}$ anD weiGht function $${{\matHIt wt}}^{{\Mbox{d$\leftrightarrow$d}\xsPace}}({u},{V}) =
\bEGin{cASeS}
{{\mbox{\It rflow}}({U},{V})} & \tEXT{if ${V}\iN {{{\mAthIt nBhD}}({u}\,\verT\,{\deLta},{{\cal D}_{{{\Rm init}}}}-{\{{u}\... | ]{}to.
The [document-to-d ocument]{} graph [[ *** *] {}]{ } ha s vertex set $ { {\ca l D}_{{{\rm init}}}}$and w ei g ht f u nc tion$${{\ma t hi t wt} }^ {{ \mb ox { d$ \left rig htarrow $d}\xspace }}( {u },{v}) =
\be g in {cases}
{ {\m box{\it rflo w}} ({u},{ v} )}& \tex t{i f ${v }\in { { {\math it Nbhd}} ({ u }\,... | ]{}to.
The [document-to-document]{}graph_[[****]{}]{} has_vertex set ${{\cal D}_{{{\rm_init}}}}$ and_weight_function $${{\mathit_wt}}^{{\mbox{d$\leftrightarrow$d}\xspace}}({u},{v})_=
\begin{cases}
{{\mbox{\it rflow}}({u},{v})}_& \text{if ${v}\in_{{{\mathit Nbhd}}({u}\,\vert\,{\delta},{{\cal D}_{{{\rm init}}}}-{\{{u}\... |
for $%
k^{\prime }>2$. We take $B_0^{+-}=0$. The Eqs. (\[rg1\],\[rg2\]) are solved iteratively. We continue iterating the equations till $%
B_{n+1}^{*}(k^{\prime })\approx B_n^{*}(k^{\prime })$, that is, till the solution converges. For $B_0^{initial}=1.0,$ the $B_n^{\prime }$s for various $n$ ranging from $0 \ldots 3... | for $%
k^{\prime } > 2$. We take $ B_0^{+-}=0$. The Eqs. (\[rg1\],\[rg2\ ]) are solved iteratively. We continue iterating the equation till $%
B_{n+1}^{*}(k^{\prime }) \approx B_n^{*}(k^{\prime }) $, that is, till the solution converges. For $ B_0^{initial}=1.0,$ the $ B_n^{\prime } $ south for various $ n$ ranging... | fog $%
k^{\prime }>2$. We take $B_0^{+-}=0$. The Tqs. (\[rg1\],\[rg2\]) are solvgd iteravively. Se contivue iterating the equations vill $%
B_{n+1}^{*}(k^{\peime })\approx B_n^{*}(k^{\prime })$, ghat is, tpll the silutmon converges. Foc $B_0^{initial}=1.0,$ the $N_n^{\prikx }$s for various $n$ ranging from $0 \ldots 3... | for $% k^{\prime }>2$. We take $B_0^{+-}=0$. (\[rg1\],\[rg2\]) solved iteratively. continue iterating the B_n^{*}(k^{\prime that is, till solution converges. For the $B_n^{\prime }$s for various $n$ from $0 \ldots 3$ is shown in Figure 1. Here the convergence is fast, and after $n=3-4$ iterations $B_n^{*}(k)$ converges... | for $%
k^{\prime }>2$. We take $B_0^{+-}=0$. The Eqs. (\[rg1\],\[rG2\]) are solved IteraTivEly. we ContInue Iterating the eqUAtioNs till $%
B_{n+1}^{*}(k^{\prime })\approx B_n^{*}(K^{\primE })$, tHAt is, TIlL the sOlution COnVERgeS. FOr $b_0^{inItIAl}=1.0,$ The $B_n^{\PriMe }$s for vArious $n$ ranGinG fRom $0 \ldots 3... | for $%
k^{\prime }>2$. We take $B_0 ^{+-} =0$ . T he Eqs . (\ [rg1\],\[rg2\] ) are solved iteratively. W e con ti n ue i t er ating the eq u at i o nsti ll $%
B _ {n +1}^{ *}( k^{\pri me })\appr oxB_ n^{*}(k^{\pr i me })$, that is , till the s olu tion c on ver g es. F or$B_0^ {initi a l}=1.0 ,$ the $B _n ^ {... | for_$%
k^{\prime }>2$._We take $B_0^{+-}=0$. The_Eqs. (\[rg1\],\[rg2\])_are_solved iteratively._We_continue iterating the_equations till $%
B_{n+1}^{*}(k^{\prime_})\approx B_n^{*}(k^{\prime })$, that_is, till the_solution_converges. For $B_0^{initial}=1.0,$ the $B_n^{\prime }$s for various $n$ ranging from $0 \ldots 3... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.