Philosopher David Hume argued against the plausibility of miracles: 1) A miracle is a violation of the known laws of nature; 2) We know these laws through repeated and constant experience; 3) The testimony of those who report miracles contradicts the operation of known scientific laws; 4) Consequently no one can rationally believe in miracles.
” 哲学家大卫·休谟反对神迹的合理性： 1）神迹违反了已知的自然规律； 2）我们通过反复的、不断的经验知道这些规律； 3）报告神迹者的证词与已知科学法则的运作相矛盾； 4）所以没有人可以理性地相信神迹。