Following Katz, the vast majority of Fourth Amendment search cases have turned on the right to privacy, but in United States v. Jones (2012), the Court ruled that the Katz standard did not replace earlier case law, but rather, has supplemented it.
卡兹案后，绝大多数有关第四条修正案搜查的案件已经转为隐私权案件，但在2012年的美国诉琼斯案（英语：United States v. Jones (2012)）中，法院指出卡兹案确立的标准并没有取代更早的判例法，而是进行了补充。