Abstract
SpatialBrain improves spatial reasoning by separating scene evidence from reasoning experience, using fused spatial memory, reusable skill procedures, and consolidated process records to guide tool use without altering the vision-language backbone.
Spatial reasoning requires more than access to geometric tools: a reasoner must decide when direct observation is sufficient and when to reconstruct, measure, or change reference frames. We present SpatialBrain, a framework that retains experience about these decisions while keeping its vision-language backbone fixed. The key distinction is between evidence about a scene and experience about how to reason with that evidence. 3DFusionMemory fuses current-scene observations into queryable spatial relations. A Spatial Skill Library provides reusable tool procedures, and Spatial Cognition associates task conditions with experience about when and how to use memory and skills. Completed trajectories are abstracted into process records and consolidated between task blocks, allowing later decisions to draw on earlier execution without transferring scene coordinates or reference answers. Across five spatial-reasoning benchmarks, SpatialBrain improves on direct answers from the same backbone on four and ties on the fifth. Component comparisons, experience-coverage curves, and traced resource decisions characterize how the framework accumulates and uses these resources.
Community
Spatial reasoning requires more than access to geometric tools: a reasoner must decide when direct observation is sufficient and when to reconstruct, measure, or change reference frames. We present SpatialBrain, a framework that retains experience about these decisions while keeping its vision-language backbone fixed. The key distinction is between evidence about a scene and experience about how to reason with that evidence. 3DFusionMemory fuses current-scene observations into queryable spatial relations. A Spatial Skill Library provides reusable tool procedures, and Spatial Cognition associates task conditions with experience about when and how to use memory and skills. Completed trajectories are abstracted into process records and consolidated between task blocks, allowing later decisions to draw on earlier execution without transferring scene coordinates or reference answers. Across five spatial-reasoning benchmarks, SpatialBrain improves on direct answers from the same backbone on four and ties on the fifth. Component comparisons, experience-coverage curves, and traced resource decisions characterize how the framework accumulates and uses these resources.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- From Reasoning Failures to Composable Video Spatial Intelligence (2026)
- VisualCoding: Learning Executable Skills for Reliable Visual Reasoning (2026)
- Reflect After Failure: Brain-Inspired Self-Evolving Agents for Embodied Spatial Intelligence (2026)
- ReTAC: Residual Test-Time Agentic Computation for Video Spatial Reasoning (2026)
- Uruqi: Learning Spatial Cognition from Visual Experience (2026)
- Frame Evidence:A Benchmark for Reference Frames and Visual Evidence in Multi-Image Spatial Reasoning (2026)
- SpatialSkill: Self-Evolving Skills for Cross-View Spatial Reasoning (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.29317 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper